Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Flexible Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Using Ethanol-Exfoliated g-C3N4/PVDF Composites via 3D Printing for Self-Powered Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Quantum Mechanical MP2 Study of the Electronic Effect of Nonplanarity on the Carbon Pyramidalization of Fullerene C60
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Highly Porous Lignin-Sulfonate Sulfur-Doped Carbon for Efficient Adsorption of Sodium Diclofenac and Synthetic Effluents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/nano14191577
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Photocatalytic Paracetamol Degradation by NiCu-Modified TiO2 Nanotubes: Mechanistic Insights and Performance Evaluation

by
Marco Pinna
1,2,
Martina Zava
1,
Tommaso Grande
1,
Veronica Prina
1,
Damiano Monticelli
1,
Gianluca Roncoroni
1,
Laura Rampazzi
3,
Helga Hildebrand
4,
Marco Altomare
5,
Patrik Schmuki
4,6,
Davide Spanu
1,* and
Sandro Recchia
1
1
Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Human Sciences and Innovation for the Territory, University of Insubria, via Sant’Abbondio 12, 22100 Como, Italy
4
Department of Materials Science WW4-LKO, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Martensstrasse 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
5
Department of Chemical Engineering, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
6
Regional Center of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Šlechtitelů 27, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(19), 1577; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191577 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 25 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 29 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Degradation of Pollutants by Nanostructured Photocatalysts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anodic TiO2 nanotube arrays decorated with Ni, Cu, and NiCu alloy thin films were investigated for the first time for the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol in water solution under UV irradiation. Metallic co-catalysts were deposited on TiO2 nanotubes using magnetron sputtering. The influence of the metal layer composition and thickness on the photocatalytic activity was systematically studied. Photocatalytic experiments showed that only Cu-rich co-catalysts provide enhanced paracetamol degradation rates, whereas Ni-modified photocatalysts exhibit no improvement compared with unmodified TiO2. The best-performing material was obtained by sputtering a 20 nm thick film of 1:1 atomic ratio NiCu alloy: this material exhibits a reaction rate more than doubled compared with pristine TiO2, enabling the complete degradation of 10 mg L−1 of paracetamol in 8 h. The superior performance of NiCu-modified systems over pure Cu-based ones is ascribed to a Ni and Cu synergistic effect. Kinetic tests using selective holes and radical scavengers unveiled, unlike prior findings in the literature, that paracetamol undergoes direct oxidation at the photocatalyst surface via valence band holes. Finally, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) tests and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HR-MS) analysis were conducted to assess the degree of mineralization and identify intermediates. In contrast with the existing literature, we demonstrated that the mechanistic pathway involves direct oxidation by valence band holes.

1. Introduction

The improvements in the quality of life that humanity has experienced since the Industrial Revolution have been accompanied by a significant increase in global water pollution [1]. Over the past few decades, particular focus has been directed toward the study of the so-called emerging pollutants [2]. This category includes a wide range of molecules, such as pharmaceuticals [3], personal care products [4], pesticides [5], and plasticizers [6], which exert adverse effects on both human health and the environment [7]. These substances have been globally found in concentrations ranging from ng L−1 to μg L−1 in surface waters [8] due to anthropogenic sources such as sewage sludges, agricultural runoff, and industrial activities [6]. Nonetheless, most of these substances currently lack international regulations specifying maximum concentration levels in natural waters. The persistence of these molecules in treated waters underlines the inability of traditional wastewater treatments (e.g., sedimentation, flocculation, coagulation) to completely remove these pollutants [9]. Among them, paracetamol, the world’s most-used over-the-counter medication, has raised significant concern as an emerging pollutant [10,11]. In fact, due to the incomplete metabolization of the human body, large quantities of paracetamol enter the aquatic ecosystem, mostly through human excretions and hospital wastewater [12].
In this scenario, green and cost-effective removal strategies to be coupled with conventional techniques are highly looked-for. It should be underlined that such strategies are expected to work effectively for the abatement of low concentrations of paracetamol (below 10 mg L−1, normally observed in polluted waters), i.e., where conventional abatement methods fail.
Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) based on heterogeneous photocatalysis, which allow the conversion of light energy to chemical energy, are promising for this purpose [13,14,15,16,17]. Photo-induced AOPs allow for the decontamination of waters by reaction of the target pollutant with in situ generated Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) [18] or directly with photogenerated holes at the catalyst surface [19,20]. The main advantage of heterogeneous photocatalytic AOP over other AOP strategies (e.g., Electro-Fenton processes [21], ozonation [22], persulfate activated processes [23]) lies in milder process conditions and in the avoidance of additional chemicals and formation of sludges [20].
In the context of environmental photocatalysis, titanium dioxide (TiO2) continues to be the most studied material to date, thanks to its non-toxicity, stability against (photo)corrosion, low cost, and availability [24]. However, this material suffers from well-known drawbacks like high charge carrier recombination, which strongly limits its catalytic efficiency. One-dimensional nanostructures such as nanotubes have been widely employed to tackle this issue as they enable improved charge carrier separation and largely increased surface area [25]. To further improve the charge separation, the formation of heterojunctions with metals [26], metal oxides [27], and carbonaceous materials is widely employed [28]. Among these co-catalysts, noble metals have been successfully employed to promote the degradation of organic pollutants [29,30]. However, their high cost and low availability present critical constraints when considering the scalability of photocatalytic processes. For this reason, researchers have focused their attention on the use of earth-abundant non-noble metals (e.g., Ni, Cu, Fe), proving their relatively high efficiency for a fraction of the price of noble metals [31,32]. Recently, bimetallic co-catalysts, formed by combining these metals, have been under investigation as they enable the tuning of optical and electronic properties through composition control, leading to a significant enhancement of photocatalytic efficiency [33,34]. Among these materials, NiCu alloys have shown a remarkable synergistic effect toward photocatalytic water splitting and hydrogen evolution [35,36]. Such alloy co-catalysts enable a more efficient charge transfer compared with pure metal counterparts. This effect has been mostly related to an optimal work function shift and the presence of both Ni-rich and Cu-rich active sites synergistically responsible for different processes at the surface of the photocatalyst [37,38,39]. Despite the benefits associated with utilizing non-noble metals, only a few studies have explored pure Ni-modified [31] or Cu-modified [40] TiO2 catalysts (in powder form) for photocatalytic AOPs, while the absence of studies on photocatalysts modified with NiCu alloys for this purpose is noteworthy.
Thus, in this work, anodic TiO2 nanotubes decorated with layers of Ni, Cu or NiCu were employed in this study for the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol in water. A systematic investigation was conducted to explore the influence of co-catalyst composition and loading. The aim was to identify the optimal photocatalyst and gain insights into the role of Ni and Cu in enhancing photocatalytic activity. Information on the reaction mechanism was gained through photocatalytic tests conducted in the presence of scavengers for hydroxyl radicals and holes, supplemented by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry measurements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. TiO2 Nanotube Array Fabrication

Ti foils (99.7%, 0.127 mm thickness, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as the starting materials for the fabrication of anodic TiO2 nanotube layers. Foils were cut to obtain slices with a 1.5 × 1 cm2 active area. After cutting, they were cleaned by sonication in acetone (Carlo Erba, Milano, Italy), isopropanol (Sigma Aldrich), ethanol (Sigma Aldrich), and ultrapure water in an ultrasonic bath (Sonorex, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany). Each sonication step was conducted for 15 min. Then, the cleaned Ti slices were dried under a nitrogen stream. Anodization was carried out in an ethylene glycol solution (99.5%, Carlo Erba) containing 0.09 M NH4F (96%, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 2% v/v ultrapure H2O. To perform the anodization, a two-electrode configuration was employed (Ti foil as anode and working electrode and a Ti mesh coated with a Pt layer as counter-electrode) with an applied potential of 40 V using a DC Power Supply (NPS1230W, Wanptek, Shenzhen, China). The as-formed TiO2 nanotube layers supported on Ti foils were rinsed and then soaked in ethanol overnight. Lastly, the amorphous nanotubes were annealed and crystalized in air at 450 °C for 1 h with a 5 °C min−1 ramp.

2.2. Sputter Deposition of Ni, Cu and NiCu Thin Films

To deposit thin films of metals onto the TiO2 substrate surface, a magnetron sputter-coater (Cressington 108auto, Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd., Watford, UK) employing the following targets was used: 100Cu (99.60 at.% pure, Nanovision s.r.l., Brugherio, Italy), 100Ni (99.98 at.% pure, Nanovision s.r.l.), 25Ni75Cu (25 at.% Ni, 75 at.% Cu), 50Ni50Cu (50 at.% Ni, 50 at.% Cu), and 75Ni25Cu (75 at.% Ni, 25 at.% Cu). The NiCu alloy sputter targets were provided by Hauner Metallische Werkstoffe (Röttenbach, Germany). Samples are herein labeled by the nominal thickness, and the chemical composition of the co-catalyst layer, e.g., (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 is a sample decorated with a 20 nm-thick layer of the 50Ni50Cu alloy. All details about tested photocatalytic materials are summarized in Table S1. Due to the different sputter yields of Ni, Cu, and their alloys, different currents were applied to achieve comparable thin film deposition times. Specifically, the current used during sputtering was set at 20 mA for Cu, 30 mA for all the NiCu alloys, and 40 mA for pure Ni. Independently of the target being used, all depositions were carried out under Ar with a chamber pressure always set at 10−1 mbar. To calibrate the sputter deposition process, the nominal thickness of the metal films obtained at fixed times and currents was determined using sputter coating square-shaped glass substrates (1.8 × 1.8 cm) and then selectively dissolving the Ni, Cu, or NiCu metal film with 2 mL of ultrapure nitric acid (obtained by a sub-boiling distillation system (Duopur, Milestone [41]), under sonication for 30 min at 30 °C, followed by 1 h of agitation using an orbital shaker (SSL1, Stuart). After proper dilution, analysis by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) (iCAP-Q, ThermoScientific) of the obtained solutions was conducted to determine the amount of sputtered metal. A summary of the employed sputtering conditions and calibration is reported in Table S2. The overall photocatalyst’s fabrication, including the growth of TiO2 nanotube arrays and sputter deposition of Ni, Cu, and NiCu thin films, is schematically depicted in Figure S1.

2.3. Characterization of Materials

The crystallographic features of the different materials were investigated using X-ray Diffraction (XRD) with a Siemens D500 (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany) employing Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mV and equipped with 1 mm slits. The measurements were conducted employing Bragg-Brentano geometry, a step size of 0.03° (2θ), and a scanning speed of 0.06° s−1. The samples were attached to an aluminum sample holder using carbon tape.
The morphology of both pristine and NiCu-decorated TiO2 nanotubes was examined with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) using a Philips XL30 (Philips A.V.) at 30 kV under high vacuum conditions. The samples were attached to an SEM stub using conductive carbon tape.
Information regarding the oxidation state of Ni and Cu for fresh photocatalysts was obtained through X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) using a PHI instrument from Physical Electronics Inc. Peak positions were calibrated with respect to the C1s peak at 284.8 eV. Fitting was carried out using CasaXPS 2.2.25 (Casa Software Ltd., Teignmouth, UK).
Diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectroscopy (DR-UV) measurements on solid samples were performed using a Shimadzu UV-2600i spectrometer.

2.4. Photocatalytic Tests and Mechanistic Studies

The photocatalytic experiments were carried out by immersing the photocatalyst layers in a stirred solution containing 10 mg L−1 paracetamol (98%, Thermo Scientific) in ultrapure water. To ensure transparency to UV radiation, a quartz test tube (volume capacity ~15 mL) was employed. In the experimental setup, 12 mL of solution was exposed to irradiation. To achieve equilibration, the system was kept in dark condition for 30 min prior to illumination. Then, UV irradiation was provided using a UV LED source (λ = 365 nm, UVWave) with a power density of 85 mW cm−2. To simulate solar radiation, a Sun 2000 Solar Simulator (Abet Technologies, Milford, CT, USA, calibrated at 85 mW cm−2) equipped with an AM 1.5 G filter was used as the vertical light source: to carry out the experiments in a side-illumination configuration, a totally reflecting Al mirror was used to deflect the light beam. To quantitatively assess the photocatalytic efficiency, the solution was analyzed by sampling 200 μL every 30 min. Paracetamol determination was performed using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography system equipped with a Diode Array Detector (HPLC-DAD) (SPD-M40, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in isocratic mode with a 1:1 acetonitrile-acidified water (0.1% v/v Trifluoroacetic Acid) mobile phase (flow rate = 0.8 mL min−1). A C18 column (column size 150 × 4 mm, particle size 25 µm, column temperature 40 °C, Interchrom, Montluçon, France) was employed for separation. To avoid interferences from the eluent itself, quantifications were carried out at 269 nm. All photocatalytic experiments were conducted in triplicate, and error bars represent one standard deviation.
The degree of mineralization was assessed by determining the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) with a spectroscopic kit from Merck and a Nova 60a spectrometer. This analytical method offers a quantification of the level of mineralization achieved, through the determination of the equivalent amount of oxygen (expressed as mg L−1 of O2) necessary to achieve the complete mineralization of organic compounds in water solution.
The degree of mineralization was calculated according to Equation (1):
Mineralization (%) = [(COD0 − CODT)/COD0] × 100,
in which COD0 is the value obtained for a fresh 10 mg L−1 solution (i.e., not exposed to UV radiation in the presence of a photocatalyst), and CODT is obtained after different durations of the photocatalytic treatment.
Reaction intermediates were qualitatively identified by analyzing paracetamol solutions at specific time intervals during the photocatalytic treatment using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry in Direct Infusion ElectroSpray Ionization (ESI) mode (Orbitrap Exploris 120, Thermo Scientific) in the 40–300 m z−1 range, employing both positive and negative ionization modes. Aliquots of the reaction solutions were sampled employing a 10 µL min−1 flow and ionized, applying respective potentials of +3.3 kV and −3.2 kV. Brute formulas were automatically detected using the software Freestyle (ThermoScientific), which employs a proprietary algorithm based on the main peak and isotope ratios.
Mechanistic studies were complemented by photocatalytic tests in the presence of scavengers. Specifically, experiments were carried out by employing a 10 mg L−1 paracetamol solution containing 1 g L−1 of either tert-Butyl alcohol (99%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or formic acid (99%, Carlo Erba) to selectively react with hydroxyl radicals or surface holes, respectively [42,43].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Photocatalysts Characterization

Anodic high aspect-ratio TiO2 nanotubes, shown in Figure 1, were utilized in this work. The obtained nanotubes exhibit an average length of 5.5 μm (Figure 1a) and an average inner diameter of 80 nm (Figure 1b). The anodization conditions were selected to specifically fabricate nanotubes with an optimized morphology in terms of efficient light absorption and charge carrier separation [44].
Following anodization, the amorphous nanotubes underwent annealing in air at 450 °C for 1 h to induce TiO2 crystallization. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis confirms the occurrence of this process (Figure S2). Peaks observed at 25.4°, 40.4°, 48.1°, 54.0°, and 55.1° were assigned, respectively, to the 101, 004, 200, 105, and 211 anatase crystal planes [45]. Peaks at 37.9°, 38.4°, 40.3°, and 50.3° were attributed to the 100, 002, 101, and 102 hexagonal titanium crystal planes (Ti metallic support) [46]. Finally, the peak at 44.6 ° was attributed to the 200 crystal plane reflection for metallic Al (sample holder) [47].
Figure 2 shows top-view SEM micrographs of annealed TiO2 nanotubes sputtered with 10 nm of 100Cu, 100Ni, and NiCu alloys (three different compositions: 25Ni75Cu, 50Ni50Cu, and 75Ni25Cu). Pure metal Ni and Cu thin films (Figure 2a,e) are composed of small nanoparticles (size < 10 nm), while the alloyed co-catalyst (Figure 2b–d) presents a more conformal film morphology, apparently without significant differences for different NiCu composition.
Similarly, morphological changes induced by different loadings of the 50Ni50Cu alloy loadings were analyzed by SEM. As shown in Figure S3, increasing the amount of alloyed co-catalyst on the surface of the semiconductor from a nominal thickness of 1 nm (Figure S3a) to 10 nm (Figure S3b) does not lead to any clearly visible difference. However, when depositing a thicker film (20 nm, Figure S3c), the surface is covered with a layer of small nanoparticles. Finally, when sputtering a nominal thickness of 25 nm (Figure S3d), the sputtered nanoparticles tend to agglomerate into larger particles, especially in the proximity of the triple points of the ordered nanotubular arrays.
Samples decorated with an increasing amount of sputtered 50Ni50Cu alloy were also subjected to XRD analysis (Figure S2). Specifically, nominal thicknesses of 5, 10, and 20 nm were selected. As expected, due to the very low amount of sputtered material (most likely below the instrumental limit of detection), no signals for Ni, Cu, or their alloy were detected: the absence of such signals could also be related to the amorphous nature of the sputtered thin film [36,48].
The oxidation state of Cu and Ni in pure Cu, pure Ni and 50Ni50Cu co-catalysts was examined using High-Resolution XPS analysis in the Cu2p and Ni2p regions. Fittings for all recorded spectra are reported in Figure 3. All Cu-containing materials (Figure 3a,b) exhibit a variable composition in terms of Cu speciation as testified by the presence of peaks corresponding to Cu (932.6 eV), CuO (933.8 eV), and Cu(OH)2 (934.7 eV) [49]. In both pure metals- and alloy-decorated materials, copper is predominantly present in the Cu(II) oxidation state. The main distinction is a higher fraction of oxidized Cu in the alloyed material (Figure 3e). This discrepancy can be reasonably attributed to the different sputtering yields and rates of the two materials. Specifically, due to the magnetic nature and the higher susceptibility to oxidation of Ni, a longer sputtering time is necessary for the NiCu-decorated material preparation compared with Cu-decorated ones [50]. Consequently, due to the relatively high background pressure (10−1 mbar) in the sputtering chamber, more oxygen can be incorporated into the sputtered thin film during the deposition process [51,52,53]. In contrast, no difference is observable for Ni speciation (Figure 3c,d): in both materials, Ni appears predominantly as NiO (855.7 eV) [54] due to its tendency to oxidize compared with Cu when exposed to air [55].
The oxidized nature of the thin NiCu film was confirmed by the HR-XPS analysis in the O1s region. The two main components of the spectrum appear to be lattice oxygen atoms, identified by the peak at 529.7 eV and surface hydroxyl groups (531.3 eV). A third component, a wider and smaller peak at 533 eV, was attributed to the presence of adsorbed H2O on the surface of the sample, reasonably due to exposition to ambient conditions. The observed peaks are coherent with the reported literature on metal oxides [56].
Based on the XPS findings, we opted to explore the potential sensitization to visible-range light facilitated by surface Cu or NiCu oxides. This phenomenon is well-documented for CuO and is attributed to its narrow band gap (1.3–1.7 eV) [57], whereas no clear evidence is provided for mixed oxides. To assess the light absorption properties of different samples, DR-UV measurements were conducted. As observed in Figure S5, no significant difference is evident between pristine and decorated TiO2 in the 200–800 nm range. Tauc’s plots (obtained by processing the data using the Kubelka–Munk function) were used to estimate the band gap energies (Figure S5 inset) [58,59,60]: both pristine and decorated materials exhibit an Eg of approximately 3.2 eV, a value commonly reported for anatase [25], highlighting the absence of sensitization toward the visible range. For this reason, we decided to employ UV irradiation at 365 nm for all photocatalytic experiments.

3.2. Photocatalytic Experiments: The Effect of the Co-Catalyst

Before conducting photocatalytic tests, the photostability of paracetamol under illumination conditions was evaluated (i.e., λ = 365 nm, irradiance = 85 mW cm−2). A 10 mg L−1 paracetamol solution was irradiated for 3 h in the absence of photocatalysts. Only negligible photodegradation of paracetamol was observed (<5%). The adsorption of paracetamol onto pristine TiO2, as well as onto decorated materials, was ruled out since, after three hours of experiments under dark conditions, no decrease in paracetamol concentrations was observed. Therefore, it can be concluded that any decrease in paracetamol concentration is attributable to the activity of the photocatalyst under UV light.
Benchmarking of the photocatalytic degradation was therefore performed. The investigation focused on the co-catalyst thin-film composition and thickness. In accordance with the literature [61,62], a first-order kinetic linearization (Figure 4a,b) was applied, and the resulting kinetic constants are reported in Figure 4c for all the tested materials.
An initial observation regarding the impact of the sputtered thin film composition is evident: Cu-rich materials (Cu content ≥ 50%) exhibit significantly higher performance than Ni-rich ones (showing no apparent improvements compared with pristine TiO2), underscoring Cu as the primary contributor in enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency. A closer examination reveals an optimal thickness for each type of co-catalyst: a bell-shaped profile in terms of photocatalytic performance is observed depending on the thickness of the sputtered co-catalyst film. This trend is often observed and can be interpreted considering that the deposition of larger amounts of co-catalyst leads to a decrease in photocatalytic efficiency, likely due to a reduction in available TiO2 surface, while small amounts of co-catalyst do not maximize the charge transfer.
Interestingly, the three best-performing materials ((20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2, (13.5 nm) 25Ni75Cu-TiO2, and (10 nm) 100Cu-TiO2) are characterized by the same Cu loading (nominal thickness of Cu = 10 nm). Nevertheless, NiCu alloys show superior photocatalytic performances over pure Cu, with (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 being the best-performing material (~80% paracetamol abatement over a 3 h irradiation step, see Figure 4a), showing a 2.2-times higher kinetic constant in comparison to pristine TiO2. This evidence suggests a synergistic effect of Ni and Cu in enhancing the photocatalytic activity, likely attributed to improved charge carrier dynamics in mixed Ni-Cu systems. Specifically, as reported in the literature, the decoration of TiO2 with Ni and Cu can lead to the formation of heterojunctions: in these systems, photogenerated charge carriers are spatially separated, leading to improved charge transfer to reactants and an overall lower recombination rate [63,64,65,66]. Moreover, enhancement of transfer to reactants has been observed when employing mixed Cu and Ni phases in comparison to pure metals [67,68]. This feature is clear when plotting the effect of the nominal Cu loading (expressed in terms of thickness) on the photocatalytic activity of Cu-, 25Ni75Cu-, and 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (Figure 4d): the efficiency toward paracetamol degradation at the same Cu content is always higher when Ni is present, confirming the synergistic effect in the bimetallic system.
After identifying the best-performing material, additional tests were conducted to evaluate (i) the required time for complete paracetamol degradation and (ii) the reusability of the photocatalyst. Complete paracetamol degradation was investigated by carrying out a long irradiation test lasting up to 24 h. As depicted in Figure 5a, complete paracetamol degradation was achieved in approximately 8 h. Regarding reusability, five consecutive abatement tests were conducted using the same material without any specific regeneration treatment between each experiment: the photocatalyst was simply rinsed with ultrapure water, dried under a nitrogen stream, and then reused. As shown in Figure 5b, no significant efficiency loss can occur for up to five cycles, highlighting the stability of the material.
Finally, to confirm the absence of sensitization toward visible light, photocatalytic degradation tests under simulated solar radiation were performed using pristine TiO2 and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (Figure S6). In both cases, the kinetic constants are lower compared with those obtained under UV irradiation due to the lower UV photon flux absorbed. More specifically, a constant of 3.77∙10−5 s−1 was observed for pristine TiO2, while a constant of 7.87∙10−5 s−1 was obtained for (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2. The overall enhancement for the NiCu-modified photocatalyst is approximately two times compared with pristine TiO2, i.e., close to the improvement calculated when employing UV radiation. This further confirms that the use of a 50Ni50Cu alloy does not induce sensitization to visible light: varying the incident light spectrum does not lead to any additional enhancement when comparing NiCu-modified TiO2 with pristine TiO2 photocatalysts.

3.3. Mechanistic Insights

To gain insights into the photocatalytic degradation mechanism of paracetamol, it is necessary to determine the active species responsible for the reaction.
For TiO2 based photocatalysts, hydroxyl radicals (OH∙), generated by reaction of water molecules with VB holes according to Equation (2), are generally reported in the literature as the main responsible for paracetamol oxidation [10,62].
h+VB + H2O(l) →H+ (aq.) + OH∙(aq.)
However, the direct oxidation of paracetamol at the photocatalyst surface by VB holes is also reported in the literature [69].
As NiCu-modified TiO2 is applied for the first time for this application, kinetic tests were conducted to unambiguously determine whether VB holes or hydroxyl radicals primarily drive the photocatalytic process. We carried out photocatalytic experiments in the presence of scavengers, i.e., tert-butyl alcohol or formic acid, which are known to selectively react with hydroxyl radicals or valence band holes, respectively [42,43]. As reported in Figure 6, no significant loss in photocatalytic activity can be observed when employing 1 g L−1 of tert-butyl alcohol for both pristine (Figure 6a) and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu decorated TiO2 (Figure 6b) suggesting that, contrarily to the reported literature, OH∙ radicals do not play a significative role in the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol with TiO2 or NiCu-TiO2. On the contrary, when the reaction is carried out in the presence of 1 g L−1 of formic acid (hole scavenger), the degradation rate is significantly reduced and, especially in the case of NiCu-TiO2, no paracetamol degradation is observed after 3 h. Thus, based on this evidence, we can conclude that the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol is mediated by surface valence band holes, which stands in contrast to the mechanisms generally reported and hypothesized in the literature for TiO2-based materials, where radical species, such as hydroxyl radicals, are typically considered the primary drivers of degradation [70,71].
By taking into consideration the oxidized nature of the thin metal film (discussed in detail in Section 3.2), as well as the evidence achieved by scavenger experiments, we propose that direct oxidation by surface valence band holes is the mechanism leading to paracetamol photocatalytic degradation. Specifically, we propose that photogenerated VB holes migrate from TiO2 toward the co-catalyst, thanks to the band alignment between TiO2 and Ni and Cu oxides [64,65]. Of course, as pristine TiO2 also possesses a remarkable activity toward paracetamol degradation, it is reasonable to suggest that paracetamol partially reacts directly with TiO2, even in NiCu-TiO2 systems. However, considering the large surface coverage of TiO2 active sites caused by the presence of the NiCu layer (see Figure 2), the direct decomposition on TiO2 sites is expected to be minimal when NiCu-TiO2 systems are employed. The reaction between holes and water, leading to hydroxyl radicals, cannot be excluded based on our data, but as previously reported, these reactive species do not seem to play a role in paracetamol degradation.
Finally, we investigated the degradation products. We specifically studied whether the degradation of paracetamol resulted in complete mineralization (i.e., oxidation to CO2) or the formation of intermediates (not detected by HPLC-DAD). Preliminary Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) tests were conducted on a fresh paracetamol solution, as well as after 3 and 24 h of UV irradiation in the presence of the best performing material, i.e., (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2.
As reported in Table 1, the observed degree of mineralization is consistently lower than the percentage of paracetamol degraded.
After 24 h of illumination (resulting in complete degradation of paracetamol), only 80% of full mineralization is achieved. Therefore, it can be concluded that some intermediates that are formed during the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol are not completely oxidized to CO2 (at least within 24 h of irradiation).
To obtain information about the nature of such intermediates, High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry analysis was conducted. Samples were collected after 3, 8, and 24 h of UV illumination and analyzed in both positive and negative ElectroSpray Ionization (ESI+ and ESI). The detected species are summarized in Table S2 in the Supporting Information.
Considering the species identified using HR-MS and the data reported in the literature [19,69], we proposed the photocatalytic degradation mechanism depicted in Figure 7. Oxidation by valence band holes on the surface of the photocatalyst can lead to the diacylation of paracetamol (intermediate a), resulting in the formation of 4-aminophenol (intermediate b). Subsequently, due to the high oxidant environment, intermediate b is oxidized to 1–4 nitrophenol (intermediate c). The loss of NO2−∙ radical then leads to the formation of hydroquinone (intermediate d). Another possible route is obtained by the loss of acetamide, leading to the direct formation of hydroquinone. Due to the unselective nature of radicals, both these processes can occur simultaneously, as evidenced by the presence of both 4-aminophenol and acetamide (intermediate e). Eventually, hydroquinone is oxidized to CO2. In any case, we cannot exclude the presence of undetected intermediate products between these two species. These molecules might not be detectable due to either presenting a nominal mass lower than 60 m z−1 (i.e., the cutoff value of the employed analytical method) or having a concentration below the instrumental LOD.

4. Conclusions

This study addressed the pressing issue of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical products, particularly focusing on paracetamol, a widely used medication with adverse environmental effects. Utilizing heterogeneous photocatalysis, our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a noble metal-free TiO2-based photocatalyst for the degradation of paracetamol. Anodic TiO2 nanotubes modified with conformal layers of Ni, Cu, or NiCu alloys were systematically investigated for the first time in view of their photocatalytic activity toward paracetamol oxidation. We found that Cu-rich materials exhibited superior performance over pristine and Ni-decorated TiO2 photocatalysts, with optimal thicknesses of the co-catalyst layer being critical for maximizing photocatalytic efficiency. Notably, the synergy between Ni and Cu in bimetallic NiCu layers significantly improved the photocatalytic activity with respect to pure Cu and Ni counterparts: this enhancement is attributed to improved charge transfer to reactants compared with the use of pure metals thanks to the formation of a heterojunction. We found that 20 nm-thick NiCu layers sputtered on ∼5.5 μm-thick TiO2 nanotube layers provide the highest efficiency for paracetamol degradation, showing a kinetic constant 2.2 times higher than that of pristine TiO2 nanotubes and leading to the complete degradation of 10 mg/L of paracetamol in around 8 h under UV light (12 mL of water volume treated). We also clearly demonstrated that direct oxidation by valence band holes is the main driving force behind paracetamol photocatalytic degradation, contrasting with the existing literature, where the degradation is typically attributed to radical species, such as hydroxyl radicals. Finally, the presence of residual intermediates was confirmed by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
Future work will focus on applying the newly developed photocatalysts to other AOPs, such as the simultaneous degradation of active pharmaceuticals ingredients (APIs), as well as their optimization for use under real-life conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14191577/s1, Figure S1: Scheme of the photocatalyst’s fabrication; Figure S2: XRD patterns; Figure S3: SEM top-view images of NiCu-TiO2 with NiCu layers of varying thickness; Figure S4: HR-XPS spectrum and fitting in the O1s region for the (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 sample; Figure S5: DR-UV-vis absorption spectra; Figure S6: Kinetics test performed under simulated solar radiation; Table S1: Photocatalytic materials information; Table S2: Calibration information for sputtering deposition; Table S3: HR-MS results at different UV irradiation times.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S. and S.R.; methodology, M.P., D.S. and S.R.; formal analysis, M.P., M.Z. and T.G.; investigation, M.P., M.Z., T.G., V.P., G.R., H.H. and D.S.; resources, D.S. and S.R.; data curation, M.P., D.S. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P., D.S. and S.R.; writing—review and editing, D.M., L.R., M.A. and P.S.; visualization, M.P.; supervision, D.S. and S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Marco Altomare acknowledges the financial support by the Dutch Research Council (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, NWO) under the framework of the ElectroChemical Conversion and Materials program (ECCM), project number ECCM.TT.ECCM.005, the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the framework of the project (DFG-grant AL2479/1-1), and the Emerging Talents Initiative ETI (ETI2018/2_Tech_11) provided by the FAU Friedrich-Alexander University FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg. Davide Spanu acknowledges the financial support for the project “PHOTONS” provided by the University of Insubria through funding for fixed-term researchers.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liyanage, C.; Yamada, K. Impact of Population Growth on the Water Quality of Natural Water Bodies. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morin-Crini, N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Fourmentin, M.; Ribeiro, A.R.L.; Noutsopoulos, C.; Mapelli, F.; Fenyvesi, É.; Vieira, M.G.A.; Picos-Corrales, L.A.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C.; et al. Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater Using Advanced Treatments. A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1333–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, M.; Sridharan, S.; Sawarkar, A.D.; Shakeel, A.; Anerao, P.; Mannina, G.; Sharma, P.; Pandey, A. Current Research Trends on Emerging Contaminants Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs): A Comprehensive Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859, 160031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cizmas, L.; Sharma, V.K.; Gray, C.M.; McDonald, T.J. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Waters: Occurrence, Toxicity, and Risk. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2015, 13, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Canna-Michaelidou, S.; Nicolaou, A.-S. Evaluation of the Genotoxicity Potential (by MutatoxTM Test) of Ten Pesticides Found as Water Pollutants in Cyprus. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 193, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bayabil, H.K.; Teshome, F.T.; Li, Y.C. Emerging Contaminants in Soil and Water. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 873499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mishra, R.K.; Mentha, S.S.; Misra, Y.; Dwivedi, N. Emerging Pollutants of Severe Environmental Concern in Water and Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review on Current Developments and Future Research. Water-Energy Nexus 2023, 6, 74–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krishnakumar, S.; Singh, D.S.H.; Godson, P.S.; Thanga, S.G. Emerging Pollutants: Impact on Environment, Management, and Challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 72309–72311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rodriguez-Narvaez, O.M.; Peralta-Hernandez, J.M.; Goonetilleke, A.; Bandala, E.R. Treatment Technologies for Emerging Contaminants in Water: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 323, 361–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lozano-Morales, S.A.; Morales, G.; López Zavala, M.Á.; Arce-Sarria, A.; Machuca-Martínez, F. Photocatalytic Treatment of Paracetamol Using TiO2 Nanotubes: Effect of PH. Processes 2019, 7, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vaiano, V.; Sacco, O.; Matarangolo, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Paracetamol under UV Irradiation Using TiO2-Graphite Composites. Catal. Today 2018, 315, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vieira, Y.; Spode, J.E.; Dotto, G.L.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; dos Reis, G.S.; Lima, E.C. Paracetamol Environmental Remediation and Ecotoxicology: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 2343–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, D.-E.; Kim, M.-K.; Danish, M.; Jo, W.-K. State-of-the-Art Review on Photocatalysis for Efficient Wastewater Treatment: Attractive Approach in Photocatalyst Design and Parameters Affecting the Photocatalytic Degradation. Catal. Commun. 2023, 183, 106764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmad, K.; Ghatak, H.R.; Ahuja, S.M. A Review on Photocatalytic Remediation of Environmental Pollutants and H2 Production through Water Splitting: A Sustainable Approach. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 19, 100893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garrido, I.; Flores, P.; Hellín, P.; Vela, N.; Navarro, S.; Fenoll, J. Solar Reclamation of Agro-Wastewater Polluted with Eight Pesticides by Heterogeneous Photocatalysis Using a Modular Facility. A Case Study. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. AlSalhi, M.S.; Devanesan, S.; Asemi, N.N.; Aldawsari, M. Construction of SnO2/CuO/RGO Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Antibacterial Applications. Environ. Res. 2023, 222, 115370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verma, M.; Haritash, A.K. Photocatalytic Degradation of Amoxicillin in Pharmaceutical Wastewater: A Potential Tool to Manage Residual Antibiotics. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paździor, K.; Bilińska, L.; Ledakowicz, S. A Review of the Existing and Emerging Technologies in the Combination of AOPs and Biological Processes in Industrial Textile Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 376, 120597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moctezuma, E.; Leyva, E.; Aguilar, C.A.; Luna, R.A.; Montalvo, C. Photocatalytic Degradation of Paracetamol: Intermediates and Total Reaction Mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, G. Photocatalytic Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment: Recent Advances and Perspective. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 3239–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nidheesh, P.V.; Trellu, C.; Vargas, H.O.; Mousset, E.; Ganiyu, S.O.; Oturan, M.A. Electro-Fenton Process in Combination with Other Advanced Oxidation Processes: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2023, 37, 101171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yacouba, Z.A.; Mendret, J.; Lesage, G.; Zaviska, F.; Brosillon, S. Removal of Organic Micropollutants from Domestic Wastewater: The Effect of Ozone-Based Advanced Oxidation Process on Nanofiltration. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 39, 101869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, B.; Wang, Y. A Comprehensive Review on Persulfate Activation Treatment of Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 831, 154906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guo, Q.; Zhou, C.; Ma, Z.; Yang, X. Fundamentals of TiO2 Photocatalysis: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Challenges. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1901997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotubes: Synthesis and Applications. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2904–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ji, L.; Spanu, D.; Denisov, N.; Recchia, S.; Schmuki, P.; Altomare, M. A Dewetted-Dealloyed Nanoporous Pt Co-Catalyst Formed on TiO 2 Nanotube Arrays Leads to Strongly Enhanced Photocatalytic H 2 Production. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Spanu, D.; Recchia, S.; Mohajernia, S.; Schmuki, P.; Altomare, M. Site-Selective Pt Dewetting on WO3-Coated TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: An Electron Transfer Cascade-Based H2 Evolution Photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 237, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pinna, M.; Binda, G.; Altomare, M.; Marelli, M.; Dossi, C.; Monticelli, D.; Spanu, D.; Recchia, S. Biochar Nanoparticles over Tio2 Nanotube Arrays: A Green Co-Catalyst to Boost the Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Upadhyaya, A.; Rincón, G. Visible-Light-Active Noble-Metal Photocatalysts for Water Disinfection: A Review. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2019, 11, 1207–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Loddo, V.; Bellardita, M.; Camera-Roda, G.; Parrino, F.; Palmisano, L. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. In Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  31. Park, J.; Lam, S.S.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, B.J.; An, K.H.; Jung, S.C. Fabrication of Ni/TiO2 Visible Light Responsive Photocatalyst for Decomposition of Oxytetracycline. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Altomare, M.; Qin, S.; Saveleva, V.A.; Badura, Z.; Tomanec, O.; Mazare, A.; Zoppellaro, G.; Vertova, A.; Taglietti, A.; Minguzzi, A.; et al. Metastable Ni(I)-TiO2−x Photocatalysts: Self-Amplifying H 2 Evolution from Plain Water without Noble Metal Co-Catalyst and Sacrificial Agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26122–26132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Gao, L.; Mao, L.; Fan, Z.; Shangguan, W.; Jiang, Z. Non-Noble Metal Cu as a Cocatalyst on TiO2 Nanorod for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 445, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khazaee, Z.; Mahjoub, A.R.; Cheshme Khavar, A.H. One-Pot Synthesis of CuBi Bimetallic Alloy Nanosheets-Supported Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes as Efficient Photocatalyst for Oxidation of Fluoroquinolones. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 297, 120480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Spanu, D.; Minguzzi, A.; Recchia, S.; Shahvardanfard, F.; Tomanec, O.; Zboril, R.; Schmuki, P.; Ghigna, P.; Altomare, M. An Operando X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of a NiCu-TiO2 Photocatalyst for H2 Evolution. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 8293–8302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pinna, M.; Wei, A.W.W.; Spanu, D.; Will, J.; Yokosawa, T.; Spiecker, E.; Recchia, S.; Schmuki, P.; Altomare, M. Amorphous NiCu Thin Films Sputtered on TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: A Noble-Metal Free Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. ChemCatChem 2022, 14, e202201052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cadenhead, D.A.; Wagner, N.J. Low-Temperature Hydrogen Adsorption on Copper-Nickel Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 2775–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ishii, R.; Matsumura, K.; Sakai, A.; Sakata, T. Work Function of Binary Alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 169–170, 658–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eastman, D.E. Photoelectric Work Functions of Transition, Rare-Earth, and Noble Metals. Phys. Rev. B 1970, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Djebbari, C.; Zouaoui, E.; Ammouchi, N.; Nakib, C.; Zouied, D.; Dob, K. Degradation of Malachite Green Using Heterogeneous Nanophotocatalysts (NiO/TiO2, CuO/TiO2) under Solar and Microwave Irradiation. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monticelli, D.; Castelletti, A.; Civati, D.; Recchia, S.; Dossi, C. How to Efficiently Produce Ultrapure Acids. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 2019, 5180610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ye, Y.; Feng, Y.; Bruning, H.; Yntema, D.; Rijnaarts, H.H.M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Metoprolol by TiO2 Nanotube Arrays and UV-LED: Effects of Catalyst Properties, Operational Parameters, Commonly Present Water Constituents, and Photo-Induced Reactive Species. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 220, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Trenczek-Zajac, A.; Synowiec, M.; Zakrzewska, K.; Zazakowny, K.; Kowalski, K.; Dziedzic, A.; Radecka, M. Scavenger-Supported Photocatalytic Evidence of an Extended Type I Electronic Structure of the TiO2@Fe2O3 Interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 38255–38269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cha, G.; Schmuki, P.; Altomare, M. Anodic TiO2 Nanotube Membranes: Site-Selective Pt-Activation and Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 258, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nagaraj, G.; Brundha, D.; Chandraleka, C.; Arulpriya, M.; Kowsalya, V.; Sangavi, S.; Jayalakshmi, R.; Tamilarasu, S.; Murugan, R. Facile Synthesis of Improved Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Solar-Light Driven Photocatalyst. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Boonchuduang, T.; Bootchanont, A.; Klysubun, W.; Amonpattaratkit, P.; Khamkongkaeo, A.; Puncreobutr, C.; Yimnirun, R.; Lohwongwatana, B. Formation of Alpha-Case Layer During Investment Casting of Pure Ti and Ti-6Al-4V Using Comparative XRD and EXAFS Investigation. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 586–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rodríguez-Salinas, J.; Hernández, M.B.; Cruz, L.G.; Martínez-Romero, O.; Ulloa-Castillo, N.A.; Elías-Zúñiga, A. Enhancing Electrical and Thermal Properties of Al6061 Parts by Electrophoresis Deposition of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Coatings 2020, 10, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ali, A.; Chiang, Y.W.; Santos, R.M. X-Ray Diffraction Techniques for Mineral Characterization: A Review for Engineers of the Fundamentals, Applications, and Research Directions. Minerals 2022, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Biesinger, M.C.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V, Cu and Zn. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Loch, D.A.L.; Gonzalvo, Y.A.; Ehiasarian, A.P. Plasma Analysis of Inductively Coupled Impulse Sputtering of Cu, Ti and Ni. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2017, 26, 065012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shimatsu, T.; Mollema, R.H.; Monsma, D.; Keim, E.G.; Lodder, J.C. Metal Bonding during Sputter Film Deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 1998, 16, 2125–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Su, J.; Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Tang, B.; Lang, X.; Jiang, M.; He, Z. Selective Bias Deposition of CuO Thin Film on Unpolished Si Wafer. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 026402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Su, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, L. Parameter-Dependent Oxidation of Physically Sputtered Cu and the Related Fabrication of Cu-Based Semiconductor Films with Metallic Resistivity. Sci. China Mater. 2016, 59, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Etzkorn, F.A. Standard Reduction Potentials by Value. In Green Chemistry: Principles and Case Studies; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2019; pp. 418–420. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, Z.; Lin, R.; Huo, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, L. Formation, Detection, and Function of Oxygen Vacancy in Metal Oxides for Solar Energy Conversion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2109503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pan, C.; Shen, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Xu, P.; Chen, W.; Tian, Y.; Deng, H.; et al. CuO/TiO2 Nanobelt with Oxygen Vacancies for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Bacterial Inactivation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 10980–10990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jubu, P.R.; Yam, F.K.; Igba, V.M.; Beh, K.P. Tauc-Plot Scale and Extrapolation Effect on Bandgap Estimation from UV–Vis–NIR Data – A Case Study of β-Ga2O3. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 290, 121576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Escobedo-Morales, A.; Ruiz-López, I.I.; Ruiz-Peralta, M.d.; Tepech-Carrillo, L.; Sánchez-Cantú, M.; Moreno-Orea, J.E. Automated Method for the Determination of the Band Gap Energy of Pure and Mixed Powder Samples Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dai, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tahini, H.A.; Lin, Q.; Chen, Y.; Guan, D.; Zhou, C.; Hu, Z.; Lin, H.-J.; Chan, T.-S.; et al. Single-Phase Perovskite Oxide with Super-Exchange Induced Atomic-Scale Synergistic Active Centers Enables Ultrafast Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aguilar, C.A.; de la Cruz, A.; Montalvo, C.; Ruiz-Marín, A.; Oros-Ruiz, S.; Figueroa-Ramírez, S.J.; Abatal, M.; Anguebes, F.; Córdova-Quiroz, V. Effect of Kinetics on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Acetaminophen and the Distribution of Major Intermediate with Anatase-Ag Synthesized by Sol Gel under Visible Irradiation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 943776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akşit, D.; Soylu, S.P.G. Photocatalytic Degradation of Paracetamol by Semiconductor Oxides under UV and Sunlight Illumination. Turk. J. Chem. 2022, 46, 1866–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Eskandarloo, H.; Badiei, A.; Haug, C. Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of an Azo Textile Dye by Using TiO2/NiO Coupled Nanoparticles: Optimization of Synthesis and Operational Key Factors. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 2014, 27, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mannaa, M.A.; Qasim, K.F.; Alshorifi, F.T.; El-Bahy, S.M.; Salama, R.S. Role of NiO Nanoparticles in Enhancing Structure Properties of TiO2and Its Applications in Photodegradation and Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 30386–30400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Singha, B.; Ray, K. Density Functional Theory Insights on Photocatalytic Ability of CuO/TiO2 and CuO/ZnO. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 72, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pansri, S.; Supruangnet, R.; Nakajima, H.; Rattanasuporn, S.; Noothongkaew, S. Band Offset Determination of P-NiO/n-TiO2 Heterojunctions for Applications in High-Performance UV Photodetectors. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 4332–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Santos, H.L.S.; Corradini, P.G.; Andrade, M.A.S.; Mascaro, L.H. CuO/NiOx Thin Film–Based Photocathodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Solid. State Electrochem. 2020, 24, 1899–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Weldekirstos, H.D.; Habtewold, B.; Kabtamu, D.M. Surfactant-Assisted Synthesis of NiO-ZnO and NiO-CuO Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Under UV Light Irradiation. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 832439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, L.; Yu, L.E.; Ray, M.B. Degradation of Paracetamol in Aqueous Solutions by TiO2 Photocatalysis. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3480–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, L.; Yu, L.E.; Ray, M.B. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Paracetamol: Dominant Reactants, Intermediates, and Reaction Mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jallouli, N.; Elghniji, K.; Trabelsi, H.; Ksibi, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Paracetamol on TiO2 Nanoparticles and TiO2/Cellulosic Fiber under UV and Sunlight Irradiation. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3640–S3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g001
Figure 1. (a) SEM cross-sectional and (b) top-view images of pristine TiO2 nanotube arrays.
Figure 1. (a) SEM cross-sectional and (b) top-view images of pristine TiO2 nanotube arrays.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g001
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g002
Figure 2. Top-view SEM micrographs of (a) 100Cu-TiO2, (b) 25Ni75Cu-TiO2, (c) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2, (d) 25Ni75Cu-TiO2, and (e) 100Ni-TiO2. All samples were obtained by sputtering a nominal thickness of 10 nm.
Figure 2. Top-view SEM micrographs of (a) 100Cu-TiO2, (b) 25Ni75Cu-TiO2, (c) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2, (d) 25Ni75Cu-TiO2, and (e) 100Ni-TiO2. All samples were obtained by sputtering a nominal thickness of 10 nm.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g002
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g003
Figure 3. (a) HR-XPS fitting at the Cu2p edge for (10 nm) 100Cu-TiO2 and (b) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2. In (c), HR-XPS fitting at the Ni2p edge for (10 nm) 100Ni-TiO2 and (d) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2. In (e), copper relative composition of the 100Cu-TiO2 (blue) and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple), while in (f), nickel relative composition of the 100Cu-TiO2 (red) and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple).
Figure 3. (a) HR-XPS fitting at the Cu2p edge for (10 nm) 100Cu-TiO2 and (b) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2. In (c), HR-XPS fitting at the Ni2p edge for (10 nm) 100Ni-TiO2 and (d) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2. In (e), copper relative composition of the 100Cu-TiO2 (blue) and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple), while in (f), nickel relative composition of the 100Cu-TiO2 (red) and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple).
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g003
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g004
Figure 4. In (a), the kinetic tests for paracetamol photocatalytic degradation for TiO2 (green), (20 nm) 100Ni-TiO2 (red), (20 nm) 100Cu-TiO2 (blue), and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple); in (b), first-order kinetic linearization of the reported kinetic tests. In (c), kinetic constants obtained by first-order linearization for the differently tested photocatalysts, while in (d), kinetic constants obtained for Cu-rich (Cu atomic fraction > 50%) categorized by nominal loading of Cu.
Figure 4. In (a), the kinetic tests for paracetamol photocatalytic degradation for TiO2 (green), (20 nm) 100Ni-TiO2 (red), (20 nm) 100Cu-TiO2 (blue), and (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 (purple); in (b), first-order kinetic linearization of the reported kinetic tests. In (c), kinetic constants obtained by first-order linearization for the differently tested photocatalysts, while in (d), kinetic constants obtained for Cu-rich (Cu atomic fraction > 50%) categorized by nominal loading of Cu.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g004
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g005
Figure 5. (a) Kinetic profile obtained using (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 photocatalyst in a 24 h-long photocatalytic experiment. (b) Photocatalytic efficiency for up to five consecutive catalytic cycles obtained with the same material.
Figure 5. (a) Kinetic profile obtained using (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2 photocatalyst in a 24 h-long photocatalytic experiment. (b) Photocatalytic efficiency for up to five consecutive catalytic cycles obtained with the same material.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g005
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g006
Figure 6. Photocatalytic test conducted without any scavenger (black) and in the presence of tert-butyl alcohol (red) or formic acid (blue) for (a) TiO2 and (b) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2.
Figure 6. Photocatalytic test conducted without any scavenger (black) and in the presence of tert-butyl alcohol (red) or formic acid (blue) for (a) TiO2 and (b) (20 nm) 50Ni50Cu-TiO2.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g006
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g007
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol.
Nanomaterials 14 01577 g007
Table 1. COD analysis results from paracetamol at different irradiation times in the presence of 20 nm 50Ni50Cu-TiO2, with relative mineralization degree.
Table 1. COD analysis results from paracetamol at different irradiation times in the presence of 20 nm 50Ni50Cu-TiO2, with relative mineralization degree.
Irradiation Time (hours)COD (O2 mg L−1)Degraded ParacetamolMineralization Degree
022.4 mg L−10%0%
314.4 mg L−178%36%
244.7 mg L−198.8%80%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinna, M.; Zava, M.; Grande, T.; Prina, V.; Monticelli, D.; Roncoroni, G.; Rampazzi, L.; Hildebrand, H.; Altomare, M.; Schmuki, P.; et al. Enhanced Photocatalytic Paracetamol Degradation by NiCu-Modified TiO2 Nanotubes: Mechanistic Insights and Performance Evaluation. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191577

AMA Style

Pinna M, Zava M, Grande T, Prina V, Monticelli D, Roncoroni G, Rampazzi L, Hildebrand H, Altomare M, Schmuki P, et al. Enhanced Photocatalytic Paracetamol Degradation by NiCu-Modified TiO2 Nanotubes: Mechanistic Insights and Performance Evaluation. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(19):1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinna, Marco, Martina Zava, Tommaso Grande, Veronica Prina, Damiano Monticelli, Gianluca Roncoroni, Laura Rampazzi, Helga Hildebrand, Marco Altomare, Patrik Schmuki, and et al. 2024. "Enhanced Photocatalytic Paracetamol Degradation by NiCu-Modified TiO2 Nanotubes: Mechanistic Insights and Performance Evaluation" Nanomaterials 14, no. 19: 1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop