Next Article in Journal
Morphological Analysis of a New Species of Micropterus (Teleostei: Centrarchidae) from Lake Erie, PA, USA
Previous Article in Journal
Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Magnetotactic Bacteria-Based Multi-Drug Delivery Platform for MRI-Visualized Tumor Photothermal Chemodynamic Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Mechanism of the Development and Maintenance of Sexual Dimorphism in the Dioecious Mulberry Plant (Morus alba)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Integrated Review of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies to Understand Molecular Mechanisms of Rice’s Response to Environmental Stresses

State Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency Production, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090659
Submission received: 20 April 2024 / Revised: 13 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 25 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Stress Adaptation)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Rice production is strongly affected by environmental stresses such as drought, heat and salt. Rice plants have developed intricate molecular mechanisms to deal with these challenges. Researchers have identified crucial genes, proteins and metabolic pathways involved in these responses through transcriptomic and proteomic studies. Understanding these molecular mechanisms can help in developing new stress-resistant varieties, thus ensuring stable production under adverse environmental conditions. This review aims to provide a straightforward summary of the progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of rice’s response to various environmental stresses through transcriptomic and proteomic studies.

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is grown nearly worldwide and is a staple food for more than half of the world’s population. With the rise in extreme weather and climate events, there is an urgent need to decode the complex mechanisms of rice’s response to environmental stress and to breed high-yield, high-quality and stress-resistant varieties. Over the past few decades, significant advancements in molecular biology have led to the widespread use of several omics methodologies to study all aspects of plant growth, development and environmental adaptation. Transcriptomics and proteomics have become the most popular techniques used to investigate plants’ stress-responsive mechanisms despite the complexity of the underlying molecular landscapes. This review offers a comprehensive and current summary of how transcriptomics and proteomics together reveal the molecular details of rice’s response to environmental stresses. It also provides a catalog of the current applications of omics in comprehending this imperative crop in relation to stress tolerance improvement and breeding. The evaluation of recent advances in CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing and the application of synthetic biology technologies highlights the possibility of expediting the development of rice cultivars that are resistant to stress and suited to various agroecological environments.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the most important human food crop in the world, feeding more than half of the world’s population [1]. As a global food crop, the yield, quality and adaptability of rice cultivars are of great importance for ensuring food security and promoting agricultural development, making these the most important goals for rice breeding and genetic improvement [2,3]. In recent years, with the increase in extreme weather conditions, it has become more and more challenging to make breeding decisions for rice productivity and quality issues [4]. In fact, due to the impact of global climate change and increasing population and industrialization, environmental stress has become one of the main factors restricting crop yield and quality, even though yield in the cultivation of most cereals, including rice, has plateaued in recent decades [2,3]. Climate change and global warming increase the severity, duration and frequency of environmental stresses during rice growing season, threatening agricultural sustainability and global food security in the coming decades [5]. By 2050, global warming and climate change are projected to reduce irrigated rice production by 7%, while rain-fed rice yields may decrease by 6% and potentially up to 2.5% [6].
To cope with the adverse effects of increasing environmental stresses on crop yield and quality, it is necessary to establish more effective breeding and cultivation strategies for the efficiency and sustainability of crop production. In the past few decades, various strategies have been employed in climate-resilient agriculture to ensure the long-term sustainability of rice production. For instance, the “green revolution” led to a substantial increase in rice yield by the development of the high-yield semi-dwarf rice cultivar that saved the world from a chronic food shortage in the 1960s [7]. However, adverse environmental conditions continue to negatively affect rice production, causing significant yield losses. Biotic and abiotic stresses, either individually or in combination, hinder the realization of the full genetic potential for optimal rice yield and productivity [8].
Plants respond to environmental stress through a series of changes at the physiological, biochemical and molecular levels [9,10]. At the molecular level, plants sense and respond to abiotic stresses through the down- or up-regulation of stress-responsive genes and proteins, and these changes can be identified by genome-wide expression analysis by transcriptomic and proteomic methods, including RNA-seq and mass spectrometry-based proteomic methodologies [11]. These high-throughput technologies have enhanced agriculture by deepening our knowledge of complex molecular response mechanisms, differential gene or protein expressions and regulatory pathways under different environmental conditions [12]. In the past twenty years, the elucidation of the molecular basis for important traits in rice and their genetic improvements is one of the most important scientific areas in rice biology. The significant progress in transcriptomics and proteomics has accelerated the discovery and functional characterization of key genes crucial for improving rice productivity and tolerance to various environmental stresses [12,13].
In molecular biology, the word “ome” refers to the study of spatial, temporal and global changes occurring in an organism. The study of omics is a field of biology that aims to understand the functions of cells, tissues and organs, as well as to extract significant biological data [14]. The completion of the rice genome sequence has provided a necessary condition for several omics studies on rice [15,16]. Since then, significant progress has been made in rice genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc., covering almost all aspects of organelles, cells, tissues and organs [17,18,19,20]. To achieve sustainable rice productivity, it is important to understand the molecular mechanism that underlies rice’s response to environmental stresses and the genetic variation that increases rice resistance to adverse environmental conditions. Transcriptomics tracks genome-wide gene expression patterns, while proteomics reveals precise protein abundance and post-translational modifications in responses to various environmental stress [21]. Advanced proteomic techniques have improved experimental methodologies for investigating gene function and phenotypic changes in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses [22]. By using omics data, we can observe how stress adaptation works on a systemic level, which can help us better understand stress tolerance mechanisms despite the complexity of the underlying molecular landscapes.
This review summarized the research progress and application of transcriptomic and proteomic studies to investigate the molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in rice. As shown in Figure 1, a graphical overview for studying rice stress response and molecular mechanisms using transcriptomic and proteomic strategies is provided (Figure 1). Our goal is to consolidate existing knowledge and provide a comprehensive overview of transcriptomics and proteomics to understand rice’s response to abiotic stress and genetic improvements. The insights in this review are significant for developing stress-tolerant rice varieties, ensuring sustainable agriculture and maintaining global food security within growing environmental challenges.

2. Brief Overview of Environmental Stress Responses and Mechanisms in Plants

In long-term evolutionary history, plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms, including a series of physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to deal with or adapt to adverse environmental conditions [9,10]. To ensure their survival and growth in various abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, heat, cold and heavy metal stresses, plants may activate several mechanisms [23]. Phytohormones, especially abscisic acid (ABA), play a crucial role in the physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of plant to various abiotic stresses [24,25]. Physiologically, a common effect of various environmental stresses on plants is the disruption cellular redox state which leads to the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and results in damage to cellular components [26,27]. On a molecular level, these abiotic stresses may trigger the reprogramming of the gene expression of plants by transcriptional, translational or post-translational regulations to turn on a variety of defense mechanisms in response to the stresses [28]. These responses ultimately manifest as changes in the relative abundance of proteins and enzyme activities. This can be caused by the upregulation or downregulation of stress-responsive genes and proteins, which alters the overall transcriptome or proteome levels [29].
Additionally, because of the ubiquitous effects of post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms (e.g., mRNA stability) and post-translational modifications, the expression patterns at the mRNA and protein levels do not always coincide with each other [30]. Furthermore, the complexity of the stress response can be significantly impacted by the extent and duration of different environmental stresses. Phenotypic plasticity, the ability to produce multiple phenotypes from a single genotype, is considered one of the major means by which plants can cope with environmental factor variability. Theoretically, phenotypic plasticity in plants, which is directly associated with the availability of proteins, especially storage proteins, may play a determinant role in plant response to environmental stress conditions [31].
For a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms that plants use to respond to various abiotic stresses, it is important to study the genes and proteins involved in the transcriptional regulation, biochemical metabolism and signal transduction pathways, especially those related to plant hormone metabolism and signal transduction. In signal transduction cascades, the regulation of stress-responsive genes is mainly attributed to second messenger molecules. It is widely accepted that the transient increase in cytoplasmic calcium (Ca2+), acting as the second messenger, plays a crucial role in plant response and tolerance to several types of environmental stresses [32,33,34]. For example, Ca2+ signaling leads to the activation and transmission of cold signals through the increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations which regulate cold-responsive genes such as OsCDPK-24, CIPK7 and other responsive genes [35,36]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that ROS signaling activating Ca2+ channels also act as a signaling mechanism in stress responses [37]. The activation of stress-responsive genes subsequently elicits a series of physiological and biochemical responses including increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activity to scavenge excess ROS and rebalancing cellular redox status [38,39,40]. Over the past few decades, while significant progress has been made in understanding the signal transduction involved in plant responses to various environmental factors, there are still many unclear aspects of regulatory molecular cascades. With the global climate changing, it will be more and more challenging to determine the mechanisms underlying plant response to environmental stresses from a static perspective. However, transcriptomics and proteomics may provide powerful tools to comprehensively characterize environmental stress responses in rice.

3. Transcriptomic Approaches in Studying Rice’s Responses to Environmental Stresses

Among omics technologies, transcriptomics is the most widely used in studying the molecular mechanism of rice’s response to various abiotic stresses. Transcriptomics studies an organism’s entire RNA transcriptome at a particular physiological state or developmental stage [41]. It is possible to link genotypes to certain phenotypes by comparing transcriptomes from different populations. Through transcriptomic analyses, researchers may yield genome-wide gene expression profiles in addition to identifying mRNA, long non-coding RNAs and short RNAs [42]. One strategy includes hybridization-based techniques, such as microarray and suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH), which were commonly used in the early research of transcriptomics. Another strategy consists of sequencing-based transcriptomic techniques, especially RNA-seq which is widely used in biological and biomedical studies. In terms of resolution and coverage, RNA-seq performs better than hybridization and other sequencing methods [43]. In the past two decades, transcriptomic strategies have identified numerous genes responsive to abiotic stresses. The upregulation or downregulation of these genes can directly influence rice tolerance to environmental stresses.
To explore how drought stress affects morphological and transcriptomic changes in rice floral development, microarray analysis was conducted on rice florets of different sizes. This analysis identified over 1000 drought-responsive genes, many of which were specifically regulated in florets of a certain size, indicating that rice responds to drought in a manner dependent on the developmental stage of the florets [44]. Additionally, the analysis revealed that drought stress reprogrammed the pathway related to gibberellin acid GA signaling and ABA catabolism. This suggests that drought stress affects interactions between reproductive development, phytohormone signaling and carbohydrate metabolism in rice plants [44]. High-throughput transcriptomic analysis showed that thousands of genes display differences in expression between upland rice and lowland rice. These differences contribute to the distinct morphological traits related to drought tolerance and adaptation seen in upland rice during its domestication. This provides valuable insights for breeding rice varieties that are more water-efficient and drought-resistant. [45]. Previously, knowledge about the temporal dynamics of rice transcriptomes under drought was limited. Xia et al. (2020) investigated temporal transcriptomic dynamics in 12 rice genotypes and revealed that drought-tolerant genotypes possess less differentially expressed genes (DEGs) but have higher proportions of upregulated DEGs [46]. Recently, a comparative transcriptomic analysis of different rice cultivars from northeast India showed that significant differences in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulations shape transcriptome profiles, influencing how each variety responds to drought stress [47]. Similarly, an RNA-seq analysis of rice roots also revealed that post-transcriptional regulation plays a role in how the plant responds to high cadmium stress [48].
To uncover the molecular responses to heat stress in rice floral organs, RNA-seq analysis identified five pectinase genes that show a strong response to heat stress. This finding offers a potential molecular strategy to address heat damage in rice [49]. To identify novel genes and mechanisms related to chilling tolerance responses in rice, transcriptomic analysis was conducted on three cold-tolerant genotypes and one cold-sensitive genotype under both normal and cold stress conditions. This analysis identified 2242 commonly regulated differentially expressed genes DEGs during cold stress in all of the genotypes, with 318 DEGs specifically associated with cold tolerance found in the three cold genotypes [50].
Since the tolerance or sensitivity to abiotic stresses involves a complex interplay between molecular, biochemical and physiological mechanisms, some researchers have conducted meta-analyses of comparative transcriptomic data to identify key genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance in rice [51]. More investigations prefer to integrate transcriptomics and physiology to reveal the mechanisms of plant resistance to various stresses [52]. Recently, a study combined GWAS and transcriptomics to identify candidate genes associated with heat tolerance in rice. This provides valuable candidate genes for improving rice heat tolerance through molecular breeding [53]. Additionally, it was also reported that integrating transcriptomics, gene co-expression networks and gene family characterization is helpful in studying the responses to abiotic stresses in rice [54,55,56].
Although plants can activate various mechanisms to survive and grow under abiotic stress, some studies suggest that different types of environmental stress may activate the same signaling pathway. For example, to understand the interplay between signaling pathways in response to Xanthomonas oryzae infection and drought stress, transcriptomic analyses were conducted on H471, a rice introgression line that exhibits broad-spectrum dual resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae and drought tolerance [57]. A total of 178 genes that were differentially expressed in H471 were common in response to both stresses when compared with its recurrent parent HHZ. These genes are involved in signaling perception and transduction, transcription regulation and stress response, indicating the overlap between signaling pathways activated by Xanthomonas oryzae infection and drought stress [57]. A similar study, through a transcriptomic analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae infection and drought stress in different rice genotypes, identified many potential genes, particularly those associated with translation. These genes could be used as molecular markers and targets for genetic manipulation to improve multi-stress tolerance and develop durable resistant rice cultivars [58]. Additionally, comparative transcriptomics of rice plants under cold, iron and salt stresses revealed that 370 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were common to the three stresses, indicating a significant relationship among these abiotic stresses [59].

4. Proteomic Approaches in Studying Responsive Mechanisms to Environmental Stresses

Proteomics deals with functional proteins’ roles, structures, localizations and interactions with other proteins and their implementation in stress or natural conditions. Thus, proteomic studies may identify potential protein markers whose changes in abundance can be associated with quantitative changes in some physiological parameters used to describe the genotype’s level of stress tolerance [60]. To identify key proteins and elucidate their underlying mechanisms of stress response in rice, many investigators have performed comparative proteomic studies on rice varieties with various tolerances or under different stress conditions [22].
Early this century, the strategy of combining two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) with mass spectrometry (MS) was widely used to identify stress-related proteins and pathways. For example, the application of 2DE and MS techniques was used to investigate the difference in cold tolerance between two distinct rice cultivars, which identified 59 proteins related to the resistance of cold stress [61]. To study salt stress-responsive proteins in rice, three-week-old seedlings were treated with NaCl, and total proteins in roots were extracted and then separated by 2DE, which led to the identification of 10 salt stress-responsive proteins through MS analysis and database searching [62]. These proteins are involved in the regulation of carbohydrate, nitrogen and energy metabolism, reactive oxygen species scavenging, mRNA, protein processing, and cytoskeleton stability, which gives new insights into salt stress response in rice roots and highlights the effectiveness of the 2DE-based proteomic approach in plant biology studies [62]. To study the initial response of rice to drought stress, two-week-old rice seedlings were subjected to drought conditions, and the changes in protein expression were analyzed using the 2DE approach, which revealed ten drought stress-responsive proteins with increased abundance and two proteins with decreased levels [63]. These proteins are involved in the defense, energy, metabolism, cell structure, and signal transduction pathways [63].
Some proteomic studies investigate the impact of a specific gene’s function on the proteome changes in rice mutant or overexpressing transgenic plants under stress conditions. For instance, to understand the early salt response of rice roots and identify the SnRK2 signaling pathway, proteome changes were analyzed by 2-DE, and protein spots were identified by LC-MS/MS from wild-type and transgenic rice roots overexpressing a rice SnRK2 kinase [64]. A comparative quantitative analysis of the proteome showed that 43 early salt-responsive proteins were more abundant in transgenic rice roots in unstressed conditions, and these proteins contain potential SnRK2 recognition motives. Furthermore, in vitro kinase assay revealed that one of the identified proteins, calreticulin, is a suitable substrate of the SnRK2 kinase [64]. In addition to the above studies, many investigations also used the 2-DE strategy to study the response of rice to various abiotic stresses and identified hundreds of stress-responsive proteins at different developmental stages in rice [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
In recent years, with significant progress in protein labeling and mass spectrometry technologies, high-throughput proteomic methodologies such as isobaric tags for comparative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ)-based quantitative proteomics have been widely used to analyze the changes in proteomes in plant biology studies [75,76,77,78]. These advanced proteomic technologies exhibit high sensitivity, excellent reproducibility, wide-range, and high-throughput analysis capabilities and other advantages, making them powerful tools to identify and quantify the levels of relevant sets of proteins in various plants [75,76,77].
An iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic study was conducted to investigate the salinity-responsive proteins and related biochemical features of two contrasting rice genotypes, which identified a total of 5340 proteins in both rice genotypes [79]. Functional characterization by KEGG, COG, and GO enrichment results suggest that differentially expressed proteins are mainly involved in the regulation of salt stress responses, oxidation–reduction responses, photosynthesis, and carbohydrate metabolism [79]. To investigate the salt-tolerant mechanism of a rice mutant with a novel allele of heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunit (RGA1), the iTRAQ-based proteomic technique identified 332 differentially responsive proteins in seedlings of the mutant and wild type in response to salt treatment [80]. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these proteins were mainly involved in the regulation of processes such as metabolic pathways, photosynthesis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, which is consistent with the lower ROS accumulation and higher ROS scavenging enzyme activities in the RGA mutant, which contributes to the enhanced salt-tolerance in the mutant [80]. The iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics of rice roots in response to aluminum (Al) stress identified a total of 700 distinct proteins; among them, 106 proteins were differentially expressed in response to Al toxicity in sensitive and tolerant rice cultivars, which may lead to a better understanding of Al tolerance mechanisms in rice and help to improve plant performance in acidic soils [81].
Moreover, iTRAQ-based proteomics analysis of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stressed rice seeds identified 140 upregulated and 265 downregulated proteins, and further analysis showed that the upregulated proteins were mainly involved in protein modification, transport, and degradation, and the downregulated proteins were mainly involved in metabolism and stress/defense responses [82]. To better understand the molecular mechanism underlying silicon (Si) alleviating cadmium (Cd) stress in rice plants, 100 proteins differentially regulated by Si under short- or long-term Cd stress were identified in iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis [83]. Interestingly, 70% of the proteins were downregulated, suggesting that Si may improve protein use efficiency by maintaining cells in the normal physiological state [83]. Besides these studies, many investigations have also combined iTRAQ-based proteomic strategies to study the molecular mechanisms of rice’s response to various environmental stresses, such as salt [84,85,86,87], high temperature [88,89], low temperature [90,91], cadmium (Cd) [92,93,94], zinc (Zn) [92], nitrogen (N) deficiency [95], low light [96], Magnaporthe oryzae infection [97], etc.
In addition to iTRAQ-based proteomic strategies, other high-throughput proteomic methods have also been used to study the molecular mechanisms of rice’s response to different stresses. For instance, a gel-free/label-free proteomic technique was applied to analyze the proteome changes in developing grains of rice cultivar Khao Dawk Mali 105 under heat stress [98]. It revealed that the proteins involved in glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle and redox homeostasis were disrupted by heat stress, suggesting that proteins involved in redox homeostasis and the carbohydrate pathway may play an important role in rice grain’s response to heat stress [98]. A label-free quantitative shotgun proteome analysis was also performed to study the response of different rice genotypes in well-watered and drought conditions. These proteomic investigations identified many key proteins and stress-responsive pathways. Exploring these protein functions will enable a deep understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms and regulatory signaling networks underlying rice’s response to various environmental stresses. In short, these transcriptomic investigations have enabled a deep understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms and signaling regulatory networks underlying rice’s response to various environmental stresses.

5. Integrating Multi-Omics Strategies for Rice’s Responses to Environmental Stresses

With increased difficulty and depth in plant research programs, the limitations and drawbacks of using a single omics to study plant signal transduction and molecular mechanisms have gradually become apparent in recent years. Due to the technological advancements, and decreased costs in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, multi-omics-based research approaches are becoming more and more popular. Integrated multi-omics datasets have been effective tools for exploring the essential genes, proteins signaling pathways and other small molecules associated with abiotic stress responses.
Over the past few decades, many researchers have integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic strategies to study the molecular responses of rice to drought stress [99,100,101,102]. A systematic study of rice floral organ responses to heat and drought stresses was conducted by combining metabolomics with transcriptomic changes, which revealed sugar starvation as a factor in reproductive failure under these stresses [99]. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic studies have identified the key metabolic pathways that support well-maintained photosynthesis under drought conditions and lead to improve drought tolerance in rice [100]. Morphological, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses of the responses of drought-tolerant and -sensitive rice varieties have shown that the expression of the Med37c and RSOsPR10 genes varies among different rice varieties, while chitinases may play a significant role in drought tolerance [103]. A comprehensive metabolomic and proteomic investigation in the biochemical metabolic pathways of rice spikes under drought and submergence stress has revealed that the two stresses mainly promote the energy metabolism pathway, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organism pathway, carbohydrate metabolic process and reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolic process functions [104]. A combined analysis of rice growth and grain yield through proteomics, metabolomics, and physiological methods, under the conditions of heavy nitrogen application before and after drought, suggests that applying heavy nitrogen application before drought can be a key strategy to enhance rice yield and stress resistance. This approach offers a new ecological perspective on nitrogen regulation in rice [105]. Analyzing the effects of space flight on rice progeny through combining proteomics and metabolomics analysis has shown that oxidative stress signals trigger sugar signals to rebuild metabolic networks to adapt to space flight stress. The reconstruction of energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism and flavonoid metabolism plays an important role in the process of adapting to space flight stress [106]. To understand rice’s response and tolerance to low and high temperature, integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approaches have shed light on the molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance [107] and heat tolerance [108] in rice.
Recently, besides multi-omics strategies, some investigations have also combined transcriptomics with other molecular approaches, such as gene family characterization [56], gene co-expression networks [55], genome-wide association (GWAS) [53,109] and ATAC-seq [110], to analyze rice’s response and tolerance to various environmental stresses. For example, to identify new candidate genes, LOC_Os01g04814, which encodes a vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4B, and LOC_Os01g04814, which encodes a glycosyltransferase family 43 protein, are used. These genes are responsible for cold stress and chilling acclimation in rice [109]. To identify new loci and favorable alleles associated with heat tolerance in rice, an integrated analysis of GWAS and transcriptomics identified LOC_Os07g48710 as a promising candidate gene. This gene may provide valuable insights for enhancing rice heat tolerance through molecular breeding [53].
Moreover, the rapid development of mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing technologies has made it possible to detect subtle changes in the transcriptome and proteome in a single cell, just as its name implies, single-cell omics. Recent advances in single-cell proteomics for animal systems have been adapted for plants to increase our understanding of plant development, response to stimuli, and cell-to-cell signaling [111,112]. Single-cell sequencing approaches can reveal the intracellular dynamics of individual cells, and elucidate biological mechanisms with high-dimensional catalogs of millions of cells, including genomic, transcriptomic, chromatin accessibility, epigenomic and proteomic data across species [113,114]. Now, they have entered the stage of combining single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic, spatial transcriptomic, and spatial metabolomic techniques to analyze plant development and environmental responses [115,116,117,118]. This will provide revolutionary new insights for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying rice’s response to environmental stress.

6. Genetic Improvements and Breeding for Rice Tolerance

Sustainable crop production is a major challenge in today’s global climate change scenario. In recent years, significant progress in rice omics has greatly enhanced our understanding of various stress responses in rice. Insights from these omics analyses have enabled the identification of candidate genes that can be used for plant breeding. In such a background, some studies have provided comprehensive overviews of all detected protein changes involved in drought stress, aiming to define new genetic markers for marker-assisted selection breeding [119]. For example, an integrated metabolomic and proteomic study of rice spikes under drought and submergence stress revealed the key metabolic pathway which provides the genetic basis for the breeding of drought- and submergence-resistant varieties [104]. The combination of genomics and transcriptomics identified candidate loci related to cold tolerance in Dongxiang wild rice, which also provided insights into the genetic improvement in cold stress in rice breeding programs [120].
The advent of gene editing technologies such as the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system has opened new opportunities for advancing crop genetic improvements and breeding [121]. These technologies enable the precise editing of target genes, which helps create higher-quality and more disease-resistant varieties. CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome-wide screens make it possible to discover novel traits, expand the range of traits and speed up trait development in target plants, which have revolutionized biological research and its applications in crop improvement [122]. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas genome editing have made it possible to efficiently target, and modify genes in most crops, offering great potential to accelerate crop improvement [123,124]. In crop breeding programs, the CRISPR/Cas system has been considered a versatile tool for editing in all layers of the central dogma with a focus on the development of plants resistant to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses [125,126]. CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering could be used to improve salt stress tolerance in rice by targeting key genes such as NHX and SOS1 transporters [127]. Reports indicate that rice yield and cold tolerance can be effectively enhanced by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to edit genes such as OsPIN5b, GS3 and OsMYB30 [128]. Rice salinity tolerance can be improved through the CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene [129]. The CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of the OsDST gene significantly improved drought and salt tolerance and grain yield in rice cultivar MTU1010 [130].
A recent study generated CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations in the OsDSG1 gene of a local rice cultivar to develop and use salt-tolerant rice varieties. This approach improved salt tolerance at both the germination and seedling stages, offering a promising strategy to enhance salt stress resistance in local rice varieties [131]. Since environmental stresses such as salinity significantly affect rice at both the seedling and reproductive stages, recent advancements in CRISPR technology, including targeted mutagenesis and recent prime editing, can better help in gene discovery and functional analysis as well as in transferring favorable alleles into elite breeding material to speed up the breeding of tolerant rice cultivars [132,133]. Using CRISPR-mediated base editors, it is reported that the base-editing-mediated artificial evolution (BEMG) of OsALS1 in planta can be used to develop novel herbicide-tolerant rice germplasms, indicating the great potential of BEMGE in creating important genetic variants of target genes for crop improvement [134]. Moreover, previous research has shown that the CRISPR/Cas9 editing of SERK2 can regulate salt tolerance. This highlights the significant potential of targeting specific BR components, such as SERK2, for crop improvement through flexible strategies [135].
Recently, it has been demonstrated that the integration of CRISPR gene editing technology and plant synthetic biology will be a cutting-edge technique for the next stage of crop genetic improvement [136,137]. Photosynthetic efficiency is relevant to sustainability and food security because it affects water use efficiency, nutrient use efficiency and land use efficiency. Some studies specifically focus on the potential of synthetic biology approaches for improving photosynthesis to drive a sustainable increase in crop yields [138,139]. These studies will provide us with new perspectives for systematically improving multi-stress resistance in rice. The application of multi-omics and big data analysis has advanced the development of more effective genetic improvements in crops, and some researchers suggest enhancing crop temperature resilience by integrating omics data with systemic and synthetic biology, especially through molecular module programs [140]. As the “chips” of agriculture, seeds are crucial to agricultural sustainability and global food security. The core goals for crop improvements and breeding in future agriculture will be highly dependent on the superior quality of seeds, which may reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides and decrease yield losses caused by global climate change, extreme weather conditions and other environmental stresses. In this regard, breeding technologies should adopt more cutting-edge sciences such as multi-omics, gene editing and synthetic biology approaches, machine learning and advanced statistical models, enabling predictive breeding [141].

7. Future Prospects and Hot Topics

To cope with adverse environmental conditions, plants may activate a series of physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to ensure their survival, and growth. These responses ultimately manifest as changes in the abundance of transcripts, proteins, metabolites, and other molecules. These changes can be caused by an increase or decrease in stress-responsive genes and proteins, changing the transcriptome and proteome levels overall. Towards a deep understanding of the responsive mechanisms of rice dealing with environmental stresses, the large-scale identification of stress-responsive genes and proteins is of great importance for elucidating the molecular mechanisms in rice. In this respect, many omics investigations in rice identified a great number of responsive genes, proteins, and pathways, which will provide not only a systematic understanding of stress-responsive mechanisms but also an omics perspective for the genetic improvement and breeding of rice cultivars with ideal resistance.
In the history of world agriculture, plant breeding over the centuries has gone through three stages [142]. The first stage is selection breeding, which relies on natural populations containing spontaneous variation to cultivate crop varieties with specific environmental adaptability. The second stage is hybridization breeding, based on the crossing of different genotypes followed by trait selection [142]. Hybridization breeding relies mainly on the theories, and applications of statistics, quantitative genetics, heterosis and mutagenesis breeding, which has become a common practice in plant breeding. The third stage is molecular breeding, which is mainly based on modern molecular biology strategies such as DNA recombination and sequencing, molecular markers (i.e., marker-assisted breeding) and transgenic technologies [142].
We are entering a new revolutionary era, which will be intelligent breeding or digital breeding. This approach combines multidimensional omics, gene editing, big data and artificial intelligence (AI) large language models to design and breed desirable cultivars. Intelligent breeding aims to develop predictive breeding methods at a higher level to minimize human intervention by automatically proceeding breeding design and propagating breeding populations and to make selections that account for various environments and climates throughout the breeding process [141].
With the increase in global climate change, agricultural production, and sustainable development are facing increasing challenges. Global climate change, and warming have led to the increased severity, duration, and frequency of environmental stresses on crop production, threatening agricultural sustainability and global food security in the coming decades [5]. In recent years, rice multi-omics studies have identified a large number of stress-responsive genes, proteins and pathways, which will ultimately serve rice tolerance improvement and breeding. However, to achieve the goals of multi-resistance, high yield and high quality in rice, it is not only necessary to integrate functional genes related to yield, quality and resistance with omics big data and AI big prediction models but to also comprehensively utilize gene editing and synthetic biology strategies to achieve genome artificial intelligence precision breeding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A. and W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A. and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, W.L.; visualization, S.B., L.Y. and L.Q.; funding acquisition, W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070197).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yadav, G.S.; Lal, R.; Meena, R.S.; Babu, S.; Das, A.; Bhowmik, S.; Datta, M.; Layak, J.; Saha, P. Conservation tillage and nutrient management effects on productivity and soil carbon sequestration under double cropping of rice in north eastern region of India. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohapatra, P.K.; Sahu, B.B.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Sahu, B.B. Diversity of Panicle Architecture and Traits Influencing Grain Filling. Panicle Archit. Rice Its Relatsh. Grain Fill. 2022, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pickson, R.B.; He, G.; Boateng, E. Impacts of climate change on rice production: Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 24, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dar, M.H.; Bano, D.A.; Waza, S.A.; Zaidi, N.W.; Majid, A.; Shikari, A.B.; Ahangar, M.A.; Hossain, M.; Kumar, A.; Singh, U.S. Abiotic stress tolerance-progress and pathways of sustainable rice production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saud, S.; Wang, D.; Fahad, S.; Alharby, H.F.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Mjrashi, A.; Alabdallah, N.M.; AlZahrani, S.S.; AbdElgawad, H.; Adnan, M.; et al. Comprehensive impacts of climate change on rice production and adaptive strategies in China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 926059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sasaki, A.; Ashikari, M.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Itoh, H.; Nishimura, A.; Swapan, D.; Ishiyama, K.; Saito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Khush, G.S.; et al. Green revolution: A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 2002, 416, 701–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, A.; Rico-Medina, A.; Cano-Delgado, A.I. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science 2020, 368, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, S.; Gong, Z.; Guo, Y.; Gong, J.; Zheng, S.; Lin, Y.; Mao, L.; Qin, F.; Zhang, T.; Chu, C.; et al. Studies on plant responses to environmental change in China: The past and the future. Sci. Sin. 2019, 49, 1457–1478. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho, K.; Shibato, J.; Agrawal, G.K.; Jung, Y.-H.; Kubo, A.; Jwa, N.-S.; Tamogami, S.; Satoh, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Higashi, T.; et al. Integrated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses to survey ozone responses in the leaves of rice seedling. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2980–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kumar, A.; Dash, P.K. Transcriptome analysis for abiotic stresses in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In Transcriptome analysis; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 61–75. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, S.T.; Kim, S.G.; Agrawal, G.K.; Kikuchi, S.; Rakwal, R. Rice proteomics: A model system for crop improvement and food security. Proteomics 2014, 14, 593–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Iqbal, Z.; Iqbal, M.S.; Khan, M.I.R.; Ansari, M.I. Toward integrated multi-omics intervention: Rice trait improvement and stress management. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 741419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Goff, S.A.; Ricke, D.; Lan, T.H.; Presting, G.; Wang, R.L.; Dunn, M.; Glazebrook, J.; Sessions, A.; Oeller, P.; Varma, H.; et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp japonica). Science 2002, 296, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, J.; Hu, S.N.; Wang, J.; Wong, G.K.S.; Li, S.G.; Liu, B.; Deng, Y.J.; Dai, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.Q.; et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica). Science 2002, 296, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Song, S.H.; Tian, D.M.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.N.; Yu, J. Rice Genomics: Over the Past Two Decades and into the Future. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2018, 16, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.J.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, D.P.; Tang, B.; Chen, C.; Zhang, D.L.; Zhang, M.H.; Duan, J.Z.; Xiong, H.Y.; Li, Z.C. Rice Omics and biotechnology in China. Plant Omics 2011, 4, 302–317. [Google Scholar]
  19. Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R. Rice proteomics: A move toward expanded proteome coverage to comparative and functional proteomics uncovers the mysteries of rice and plant biology. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1630–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Komatsu, S.; Konishi, H.; Shen, S.H.; Yang, G.X. Rice proteomics—A step toward functional analysis of the rice genome. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2003, 2, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Diz, A.P.; Martínez-Fernández, M.; Rolán-Alvarez, E. Proteomics in evolutionary ecology: Linking the genotype with the phenotype. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 1060–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.L.; Cai, X.F.; Xu, C.X.; Wang, Q.H.; Dai, S.J. Drought-responsive mechanisms in plant leaves revealed by proteomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raghavendra, A.S.; Gonugunta, V.K.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. ABA perception and signalling. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yoshida, T.; Mogami, J.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baxter, A.; Mittler, R.; Suzuki, N. ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ku, Y.-S.; Wong, J.W.-H.; Mui, Z.; Liu, X.; Hui, J.H.-L.; Chan, T.-F.; Lam, H.-M. Small RNAs in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses: Regulatory Roles and Study Methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 24532–24554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ghosh, D.; Xu, J. Abiotic stress responses in plant roots: A proteomics perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 66977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Howell, K.A.; Narsai, R.; Carroll, A.; Ivanova, A.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B.r.; Millar, A.H.; Whelan, J. Mapping metabolic and transcript temporal switches during germination in rice highlights specific transcription factors and the role of RNA instability in the germination process. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 961–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gratani, L. Plant Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Environmental Factors. Adv. Bot. 2014, 2014, 208747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gilroy, S.; Bialasek, M.; Suzuki, N.; Gorecka, M.; Devireddy, A.R.; Karpinski, S.; Mittler, R. ROS, Calcium, and Electric Signals: Key Mediators of Rapid Systemic Signaling in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mohanta, T.K.; Bashir, T.; Hashem, A.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Khan, A.L.; Al-Harrasi, A.S. Early Events in Plant Abiotic Stress Signaling: Interplay Between Calcium, Reactive Oxygen Species and Phytohormones. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1033–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Knight, H.; Trewavas, A.J.; Knight, M.R. Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involves two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 489–503. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guo, X.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Xu, S.; Batistič, O.; Steinhorst, L.; Li, H.; Weng, Y.; Ren, D.; Kudla, J.; et al. Cold-induced calreticulin OsCRT3 conformational changes promote OsCIPK7 binding and temperature sensing in rice. EMBO J. 2023, 42, e110518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, D.; Guo, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; Yao, X.; Weng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, C.M.; Chong, K. OsCIPK7 point-mutation leads to conformation and kinase-activity change for sensing cold response. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019, 61, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mori, I.C.; Schroeder, J.I. Reactive oxygen species activation of plant Ca2+ channels. A signaling mechanism in polar growth, hormone transduction, stress signaling, and hypothetically mechanotransduction. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Halliwell, B. Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1866–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Blumenberg, M. Transcriptome Analysis; BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Li, R.; Chen, B. Proteomic response of hybrid wild rice to cold stress at the seedling stage. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hrdlickova, R.; Toloue, M.; Tian, B. RNA-Seq methods for transcriptome analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2017, 8, e1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jin, Y.; Yang, H.X.; Wei, Z.; Ma, H.; Ge, X.C. Rice Male Development under Drought Stress: Phenotypic Changes and Stage-Dependent Transcriptomic Reprogramming. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1630–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Luo, Z.; Xiong, J.; Xia, H.; Ma, X.S.; Gao, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, G.L.; Yu, X.Q.; Luo, L.J. Transcriptomic divergence between upland and lowland ecotypes contributes to rice adaptation to a drought-prone agroecosystem. Evol. Appl. 2020, 13, 2484–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xia, H.; Ma, X.S.; Xu, K.; Wang, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Chen, L.; Luo, L.J. Temporal transcriptomic differences between tolerant and susceptible genotypes contribute to rice drought tolerance. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sahoo, S.; Kusunoki, K.; Goswami, K.; Koyama, H.; Sanan-Mishra, N.; Panda, S.K. Differential Transcriptional Regulation of Drought Stress Revealed by Comparative RNA-seq Analysis of Contrasting Rice from North East India. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5780–5795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, F.; Liu, Q.Q.; Zheng, L.; Cui, Y.Q.; Shen, Z.G.; Zheng, L.Q. RNA-Seq Analysis of Rice Roots Reveals the Involvement of Post-Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Cadmium Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, L.Q.; Taohua, Z.; Gui, W.B.; Xu, L.S.; Li, J.; Ding, Y.F. Five pectinase gene expressions highly responding to heat stress in rice floral organs revealed by RNA-seq analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shen, C.X.; Li, D.; He, R.H.; Fang, Z.; Xia, Y.M.; Gao, J.; Shen, H.; Cao, M.L. Comparative transcriptome analysis of RNA-seq data for cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive rice genotypes under cold stress. J. Plant Biol. 2014, 57, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Buti, M.; Baldoni, E.; Formentin, E.; Milc, J.; Frugis, G.; Lo Schiavo, F.; Genga, A.; Francia, E. A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Transcriptomic Data Reveals a Set of Key Genes Involved in the Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, H.; Liu, M.L.; Meng, F.Y.; Zheng, D.F.; Feng, N.J. Transcriptomics and physiology reveal the mechanism of potassium indole-3-butyrate (IBAK) mediating rice resistance to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, P.P.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, G.G.; Miao, S.Y.; Lu, J.B.; Qian, Y.K.; Zhao, X.Q.; Wang, W.S.; Qiu, X.J.; Zhang, F.; et al. Integrating GWAS and transcriptomics to identify candidate genes conferring heat tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1102938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Q.P.; Teng, R.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Sheng, S.; Xiao, Y.H.; Deng, H.B.; Tang, W.B.; Wang, F. Integrative transcriptomic analysis deciphering the role of rice bHLH transcription factor Os04g0301500 in mediating responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1266242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Abdullah-Zawawi, M.R.; Tan, L.W.; Ab Rahman, Z.; Ismail, I.; Zainal, Z. An Integration of Transcriptomic Data and Modular Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Uncovers Drought Stress-Related Hub Genes in Transgenic Rice Overexpressing OsAbp57. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lei, L.; Yang, L.M.; Cui, B.W.; Liu, H.L.; Wang, J.G.; Zheng, H.L.; Xin, W.; Zou, D.T. Combined gene family characterization and RNA-Seq to study the response of β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase to abiotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 95, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, F.; Zhang, F.; Huang, L.Y.; Cruz, C.V.; Ali, J.H.; Xu, J.L.; Zhou, Y.L.; Li, Z.K. Overlap between Signaling Pathways Responsive to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Infection and Drought Stress in Rice Introgression Line Revealed by RNA-Seq. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pal, G.; Bakade, R.; Deshpande, S.; Sureshkumar, V.; Patil, S.S.; Dawane, A.; Agarwal, S.; Niranjan, V.; PrasannaKumar, M.K.; Vemanna, R.S. Transcriptomic responses under combined bacterial blight and drought stress in rice reveal potential genes to improve multi-stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. do Amaral, M.N.; Arge, L.W.P.; Benitez, L.C.; Danielowski, R.; Silveira, S.F.D.; Farias, D.D.; de Oliveira, A.C.; da Maia, L.C.; Braga, E.J.B. Comparative transcriptomics of rice plants under cold, iron, and salt stresses. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2016, 16, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I.T.; Renaut, J. Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress—Contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 1301–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ji, L.; Zhou, P.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, R.; Qiu, Y. Proteomic Analysis of Rice Seedlings Under Cold Stress. Protein J. 2017, 36, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, S.P.; Tang, Z.C.; Su, W.; Sun, W.N. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ali, G.M.; Komatsu, S. Proteomic analysis of rice leaf sheath during drought stress. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nam, M.H.; Huh, S.M.; Kim, K.M.; Park, W.J.; Seo, J.B.; Cho, K.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, B.G.; Yoon, I.S. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress-responsive proteins in roots of SnRK2 transgenic rice. Proteome Sci. 2012, 10, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, X.J.; Yang, M.F.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Shen, S.H. Proteomic Analysis of Salt Stress Responses in Rice Shoot. J. Plant Biol. 2011, 54, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jagadish, S.V.K.; Muthurajan, R.; Rang, Z.W.; Malo, R.; Heuer, S.; Bennett, J.; Craufurd, P.Q. Spikelet Proteomic Response to Combined Water Deficit and Heat Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa cv. N22). Rice 2011, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xiong, J.H.; Fu, B.Y.; Xu, H.X.; Li, Y.S. Proteomic analysis of PEG-simulated drought stress-responsive proteins of rice leaves using a pyramiding rice line at the seedling stage. Bot. Stud. 2010, 51, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yan, S.P.; Su, W.A.; Tang, Z.C.; Sun, W.N. A proteomic study of salt stress response in rice. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2004, 3, S209. [Google Scholar]
  69. Salekdeh, G.H.; Siopongco, J.; Wade, L.J.; Ghareyazie, B.; Bennett, J. Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1131–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Damaris, R.N.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.L.; Chen, X.; Murage, H.; Yang, P.F. A proteomic analysis of salt stress response in seedlings of two African rice cultivars. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Proteins Proteom. 2016, 1864, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hosseini, S.A.; Gharechahi, J.; Heidari, M.; Koobaz, P.; Abdollahi, S.; Mirzaei, M.; Nakhoda, B.; Salekdeh, G.H. Comparative proteomic and physiological characterisation of two closely related rice genotypes with contrasting responses to salt stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015, 42, 527–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maksup, S.; Roytrakul, S.; Supaibulwatana, K. Physiological and comparative proteomic analyses of Thai jasmine rice and two check cultivars in response to drought stress. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, C.W.; Chang, T.S.; Hsu, Y.K.; Wang, A.Z.; Yen, H.C.; Wu, Y.P.; Wang, C.S.; Lai, C.C. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress responsive proteins in roots and leaves of rice. Proteomics 2014, 14, 1759–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sarhadi, E.; Bazargani, M.M.; Sajise, A.G.; Abdolahi, S.; Vispo, N.A.; Arceta, M.; Nejad, G.M.; Singh, R.K.; Salekdeh, G.H. Proteomic analysis of rice anthers under salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 58, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Casado-Vela, J.; Martínez-Esteso, M.J.; Rodriguez, E.; Borrás, E.; Elortza, F.; Bru-Martínez, R. iTRAQ-based quantitative analysis of protein mixtures with large fold change and dynamic range. Proteomics 2010, 10, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Oeljeklaus, S.; Meyer, H.E.; Warscheid, B. Advancements in plant proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jorrín-Novo, J.V.; Maldonado, A.M.; Echevarría-Zomeño, S.; Valledor, L.; Castillejo, M.A.; Curto, M.; Valero, J.; Sghaier, B.; Donoso, G.; Redondo, I. Plant proteomics update (2007–2008): Second-generation proteomic techniques, an appropriate experimental design, and data analysis to fulfill MIAPE standards, increase plant proteome coverage and expand biological knowledge. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 285–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pierce, A.; Unwin, R.D.; Evans, C.A.; Griffiths, S.; Carney, L.; Zhang, L.; Jaworska, E.; Lee, C.F.; Blinco, D.; Okoniewski, M.J.; et al. Eight-channel iTRAQ enables comparison of the activity of six leukemogenic tyrosine kinases. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2008, 7, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hussain, S.; Zhu, C.Q.; Bai, Z.G.; Huang, J.; Zhu, L.F.; Cao, X.C.; Nanda, S.; Hussain, S.; Riaz, A.; Liang, Q.D.; et al. iTRAQ-Based Protein Profiling and Biochemical Analysis of Two Contrasting Rice Genotypes Revealed Their Differential Responses to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Peng, P.; Gao, Y.D.; Li, Z.; Yu, Y.W.; Qin, H.; Guo, Y.; Huang, R.F.; Wang, J. Proteomic Analysis of a Rice Mutant Possessing a Novel Allele of Heterotrimeric G Protein Alpha Subunit (RGA1) in Salt Stress with a Focus on ROS Scavenging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Z.Q.; Xu, X.Y.; Gong, Q.Q.; Xie, C.; Fan, W.; Yang, J.L.; Lin, Q.S.; Zheng, S.J. Root proteome of rice studied by iTRAQ provides integrated insight into aluminum stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. J. Proteom. 2014, 98, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Qian, D.; Tian, L.; Qu, L. Proteomic analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress responses in rice seeds. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ma, J.; Sheng, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis reveals the mechanisms of silicon-mediated cadmium tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa) cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 104, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Xiong, E.; Zhang, C.; Ye, C.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Dong, G.; Zeng, D.; Yu, Y.; Wu, L. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of rice formyl tetrahydrofolate deformylase in salt response. Planta 2021, 254, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Moin, M.; Saha, A.; Bakshi, A.; Madhav, M.S.; Kirti, P.B. Constitutive expression of Ribosomal Protein L6 modulates salt tolerance in rice transgenic plants. Gene 2021, 789, 145670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lakra, N.; Kaur, C.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Mapping the ‘early salinity response’ triggered proteome adaptation in contrasting rice genotypes using iTRAQ approach. Rice 2019, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xu, J.; Lan, H.; Fang, H.; Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Huang, J. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) salt response. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, H.Y.; Lei, G.; Zhou, H.W.; He, C.; Liao, J.L.; Huang, Y.J. Quantitative iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of rice grains to assess high night temperature stress. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, H.; Liu, K.; Matsui, T.; Tian, X.; Yang, P. iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Proteomics Analysis on Rice Anther Responding to High Temperature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qing, D.; Deng, G.; Pan, Y.; Gao, L.; Liang, H.; Zhou, W.; Chen, W.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Gao, J.; et al. ITRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of japonica rice seedling during cold stress. Breed. Sci. 2022, 72, 150–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gazquez, A.; Abdelgawad, H.; Baggerman, G.; Van Raemdonck, G.; Asard, H.; Maiale, S.J.; Rodriguez, A.A.; Beemster, G.T.S. Redox homeostasis in the growth zone of the rice leaf plays a key role in cold tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1053–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, H.; Zhang, W.; Huang, S.; Xu, P.; Cao, Z.; Chen, M.; Lin, X. The potential role of plasma membrane proteins in response to Zn stress in rice roots based on iTRAQ and PRM under low Cd condition. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 429, 128324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sagonda, T.; Adil, M.F.; Sehar, S.; Rasheed, A.; Joan, H.I.; Ouyang, Y.; Shamsi, I.H. Physio-ultrastructural footprints and iTRAQ-based proteomic approach unravel the role of Piriformospora indica-colonization in counteracting cadmium toxicity in rice. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf. 2021, 220, 112390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhong, M.; Li, S.; Huang, F.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, J.; Sheng, Z.; Tang, S.; Wei, X.; Hu, P. The Phosphoproteomic Response of Rice Seedlings to Cadmium Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Xiong, Q.; Zhong, L.; Shen, T.; Cao, C.; He, H.; Chen, X. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic and physiological analysis of the response to N deficiency and the compensation effect in rice. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, Y.; Pan, T.; Tang, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, P.; Li, H.; Huang, W.; Tu, S.; Ren, G.; et al. Proteomic Analysis of Rice Subjected to Low Light Stress and Overexpression of OsGAPB Increases the Stress Tolerance. Rice 2020, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lin, S.; Nie, P.; Ding, S.; Zheng, L.; Chen, C.; Feng, R.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Fang, Z.; et al. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Provides Insights into Rice Defense Mechanisms against Magnaporthe oryzae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Timabud, T.; Yin, X.J.; Pongdontri, P.; Komatsu, S. Gel-free/label-free proteomic analysis of developing rice grains under heat stress. J. Proteom. 2016, 133, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Li, X.; Lawas, L.M.F.; Malo, R.; Glaubitz, U.; Erban, A.; Mauleon, R.; Heuer, S.; Zuther, E.; Kopka, J.; Hincha, D.K.; et al. Metabolic and transcriptomic signatures of rice floral organs reveal sugar starvation as a factor in reproductive failure under heat and drought stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 2171–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ma, X.S.; Xia, H.; Liu, Y.H.; Wei, H.B.; Zheng, X.G.; Song, C.Z.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Luo, L.J. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Studies Disclose Key Metabolism Pathways Contributing to Well-maintained Photosynthesis under the Drought and the Consequent Drought-Tolerance in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lu, S.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, S.R.; Han, B.Y.; Zhao, C.L.; Xue, P.H.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, H.; Wang, B.H.; Cao, Y.Y. Combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals key components of overexpression improves drought tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1043757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lu, S.; Jia, Z.C.; Meng, X.F.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, S.R.; Fu, C.Z.; Yang, L.; Zhou, R.; Wang, B.H.; Cao, Y.Y. Combined Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Allantoin Enhances Drought Tolerance in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Anupama, A.; Bhugra, S.; Lall, B.; Chaudhury, S.; Chugh, A. Morphological, transcriptomic and proteomic responses of contrasting rice genotypes towards drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 166, 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xiong, Q.Q.; Cao, C.H.; Shen, T.H.; Zhong, L.; He, H.H.; Chen, X.R. Comprehensive metabolomic and proteomic analysis in biochemical metabolic pathways of rice spikes under drought and submergence stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2019, 1867, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Du, J.; Shen, T.; Xiong, Q.; Zhu, C.; Peng, X.; He, X.; Fu, J.; Ouyang, L.; Bian, J.; Hu, L.; et al. Combined proteomics, metabolomics and physiological analyses of rice growth and grain yield with heavy nitrogen application before and after drought. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zeng, D.; Cui, J.; Yin, Y.; Dai, C.; Zhao, H.; Song, C.; Guan, S.; Cheng, D.; Sun, Y.; Lu, W. Combining Proteomics and Metabolomics to Analyze the Effects of Spaceflight on Rice Progeny. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 900143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jia, Y.; Liu, H.; Qu, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhang, D.; Zou, D.; Zhao, H. Transcriptome Sequencing and iTRAQ of Different Rice Cultivars Provide Insight into Molecular Mechanisms of Cold-Tolerance Response in Japonica Rice. Rice 2020, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Huang, M.; Gao, P.; Chen, H.; Liu, M.X.; Chen, Q.; Yang, Z.R.; Sun, Q. Transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of II YOU 838 (Oryza sativa) provide insights into heat stress tolerance in hybrid rice. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Khatab, A.A.; Li, J.G.; Hu, L.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Fan, C.C.; Wang, L.Q.; Xie, G.S. Global identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes for cold stress and chilling acclimation in rice through GWAS and RNA-seq. Planta 2022, 256, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Qiu, F.X.; Zheng, Y.J.; Lin, Y.; Woldegiorgis, S.T.; Xu, S.C.; Feng, C.Q.; Huang, G.P.; Shen, H.L.; Xu, Y.Y.; Kabore, M.A.F.; et al. Integrated ATAC-Seq and RNA-Seq Data Analysis to Reveal Function in Rice in Response to Heat Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Clark, N.M.; Elmore, J.M.; Walley, J.W. To the proteome and beyond: Advances in single-cell omics profiling for plant systems. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 726–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Thibivilliers, S.; Libault, M. Enhancing Our Understanding of Plant Cell-to-Cell Interactions Using Single-Cell Omics. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 696811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mo, Y.; Jiao, Y. Advances and applications of single-cell omics technologies in plant research. Plant J. 2022, 110, 1551–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chau, T.; Timilsena, P.; Li, S. Gene Regulatory Network Modeling Using Single-Cell Multi-Omics in Plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2023, 2698, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Zhang, J.; Ahmad, M.; Gao, H. Application of single-cell multi-omics approaches in horticulture research. Mol. Hortic. 2023, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yu, X.; Liu, Z.; Sun, X. Single-cell and spatial multi-omics in the plant sciences: Technical advances, applications, and perspectives. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Li, C.; Wood, J.C.; Vu, A.H.; Hamilton, J.P.; Rodriguez Lopez, C.E.; Payne, R.M.E.; Serna Guerrero, D.A.; Gase, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Vaillancourt, B.; et al. Single-cell multi-omics in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2023, 19, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Depuydt, T.; De Rybel, B.; Vandepoele, K. Charting plant gene functions in the multi-omics and single-cell era. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ghatak, A.; Chaturvedi, P.; Weckwerth, W. Cereal Crop Proteomics: Systemic Analysis of Crop Drought Stress Responses Towards Marker-Assisted Selection Breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, D.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, C.; Chen, P.; Chen, D.; Deng, W.; Wang, J. Combination of Genomics, Transcriptomics Identifies Candidate Loci Related to Cold Tolerance in Dongxiang Wild Rice. Plants 2022, 11, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Das, A.; Ghana, P.; Rudrappa, B.; Gandhi, R.; Tavva, V.S.; Mohanty, A. Genome Editing of Rice by CRISPR-Cas: End-to-End Pipeline for Crop Improvement. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2238, 115–134. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sedeek, K.E.M.; Mahas, A.; Mahfouz, M. Plant Genome Engineering for Targeted Improvement of Crop Traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Gao, C. CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 667–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rana, S.; Aggarwal, P.R.; Shukla, V.; Giri, U.; Verma, S.; Muthamilarasan, M. Genome Editing and Designer Crops for the Future. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2408, 37–69. [Google Scholar]
  125. Nascimento, F.D.S.; Rocha, A.J.; Soares, J.; Mascarenhas, M.S.; Ferreira, M.D.S.; Morais Lino, L.S.; Ramos, A.P.S.; Diniz, L.E.C.; Mendes, T.A.O.; Ferreira, C.F.; et al. Gene Editing for Plant Resistance to Abiotic Factors: A Systematic Review. Plants 2023, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Andolfo, G.; Iovieno, P.; Frusciante, L.; Ercolano, M.R. Genome-Editing Technologies for Enhancing Plant Disease Resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Farhat, S.; Jain, N.; Singh, N.; Sreevathsa, R.; Dash, P.K.; Rai, R.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, P.; Sarkar, A.K.; Jain, A.; et al. CRISPR-Cas9 directed genome engineering for enhancing salt stress tolerance in rice. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 96, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zeng, Y.; Wen, J.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Q.; Huang, W. Rational Improvement of Rice Yield and Cold Tolerance by Editing the Three Genes OsPIN5b, GS3, and OsMYB30 With the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, A.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, T.; Chen, Z.; Kong, D.; Bi, J.; Zhang, F.; Luo, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Enhanced rice salinity tolerance via CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Santosh Kumar, V.V.; Verma, R.K.; Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Watts, A.; Rao, M.V.; Chinnusamy, V. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ly, L.K.; Ho, T.M.; Bui, T.P.; Nguyen, L.T.; Phan, Q.; Le, N.T.; Khuat, L.T.M.; Le, L.H.; Chu, H.H.; Pham, N.B.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9 targeted mutations of OsDSG1 gene enhanced salt tolerance in rice. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2024, 24, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ganie, S.A.; Wani, S.H.; Henry, R.; Hensel, G. Improving rice salt tolerance by precision breeding in a new era. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 60, 101996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vu, T.V.; Nguyen, N.T.; Kim, J.; Hong, J.C.; Kim, J.Y. Prime editing: Mechanism insight and recent applications in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kuang, Y.; Li, S.; Ren, B.; Yan, F.; Spetz, C.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, H. Base-Editing-Mediated Artificial Evolution of OsALS1 In Planta to Develop Novel Herbicide-Tolerant Rice Germplasms. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dong, N.; Yin, W.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Z.; Huang, W.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Meng, W.; Niu, M.; et al. Regulation of Brassinosteroid Signaling and Salt Resistance by SERK2 and Potential Utilization for Crop Improvement in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 621859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kumlehn, J.; Pietralla, J.; Hensel, G.; Pacher, M.; Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas revolution continues: From efficient gene editing for crop breeding to plant synthetic biology. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 1127–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ronspies, M.; Dorn, A.; Schindele, P.; Puchta, H. CRISPR-Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kubis, A.; Bar-Even, A. Synthetic biology approaches for improving photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1425–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Smith, E.N.; van Aalst, M.; Tosens, T.; Niinemets, U.; Stich, B.; Morosinotto, T.; Alboresi, A.; Erb, T.J.; Gomez-Coronado, P.A.; Tolleter, D.; et al. Improving photosynthetic efficiency toward food security: Strategies, advances, and perspectives. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 1547–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, J.; Li, X.M.; Lin, H.X.; Chong, K. Crop Improvement Through Temperature Resilience. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 753–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Jeon, D.; Kang, Y.; Lee, S.; Choi, S.; Sung, Y.; Lee, T.-H.; Kim, C. Digitalizing breeding in plants: A new trend of next-generation breeding based on genomic prediction. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1092584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, G. Target chromosome-segment substitution: A way to breeding by design in rice. Crop J. 2021, 9, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A graphical route for transcriptomic and proteomic strategies to investigate rice’s responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Figure 1. A graphical route for transcriptomic and proteomic strategies to investigate rice’s responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Biology 13 00659 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aslam, N.; Li, Q.; Bashir, S.; Yuan, L.; Qiao, L.; Li, W. Integrated Review of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies to Understand Molecular Mechanisms of Rice’s Response to Environmental Stresses. Biology 2024, 13, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090659

AMA Style

Aslam N, Li Q, Bashir S, Yuan L, Qiao L, Li W. Integrated Review of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies to Understand Molecular Mechanisms of Rice’s Response to Environmental Stresses. Biology. 2024; 13(9):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aslam, Naveed, Qinying Li, Sehrish Bashir, Liuzhen Yuan, Lei Qiao, and Wenqiang Li. 2024. "Integrated Review of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies to Understand Molecular Mechanisms of Rice’s Response to Environmental Stresses" Biology 13, no. 9: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop