Multi-Motor Cooperative Control Strategy for Speed Synchronous Control of Construction Platform

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a strategy for speed synchronous control of construction platforms based on Multi-motor. In my opinion, the authors are invited to explore the contribution presented in this paper. as well as it is necessary to show the scientific approach of this contribution, knowing that we have a variety of works that propose a robust algorithm in the control strategy.I see no innovation in this paper. However, the paper can be resubmitted after this remark.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors are reported a construction platform of barrel-type buildings with a multi-motor system. Synchronous control of multiple motors has implemented for fast response through cooperative control. Then, the conventional PID controller is improved by machine learning. The work is quite interesting, but it can be improved further. Some of them are listed below,

1.      The introduction section needs to be needs updated with relevant references ‘https://doi.org/10.1177/0959651820973797’  , ‘https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesit.2014.12.004’    and similar papers.

2.      ANN training data can be provided as tabular format.

3.      Controller performance may be represent through performance index.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

After careful reading the paper, I have some suggestions.

1. Abstract: Keyword are not matching, such as

Barrel-type buildings, Permanent magnet synchronous motor, and RBF neural network not appear in content. Please recheck.

2. The whole paper is based on simulation, if the author could. Please plot the block diagram to clear the whole analysis steps.

3. The paper is focused on enhance the function of control parameters, based the results: Error of motor speed decrease into 35%. Motor regulation time of load disturbance lower into 5%. Synchronization error reduces 20%. and Adjustment time of synchronization error from 0.07s down to 0.02s. It is a good idea and result, but in the abstract, the author mentioned the robustness. Could the author add some descriptions to explain for robustness?

4. In page 6, line 215, Reference[19] does not seem to be relevant to the paper. Please recheck

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All comments have been taken into consideration, I recommend the paper in its current form.

Reviewer 2 Report

No comment