Novel Summation-Type Triggering Condition on Event-Based Memory Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The paper is well written, a lot of references have been included and the topic is very interesting for the control community.

The event-triggered memory output feedback control (EMOFC) for discrete-time NCS with the network-induced delay presented is very interesting control scheme. It has been described in detail in the paper and in my opinion, the theoretical analysis is excelent. Also the presented numerical examples show clearly the capabilities of this control algorithm.

Finally, in my opinion the work would improve if you described in what kind of applications this new control scheme has advantages over classic methods.

Best Regards.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has a great potential but in the reviewer's opinion, it should be better exposed that the proposed method is capable of the reduction of average signal transmission frequency and reliability while covering standard condition as mentioned in the abstract and summary.

The term signal transmission frequency appears only in these two places.

Fig. 4, 5, 6 and 7 are difficult to compare, the differences are not visible to the reader.

The examples are the result of simulation and there should be more of them. The waveform in Fig. 9 is difficult to interpret, can a maximum ATR be expected?

The theoretical background literature should be clearly separated from the own contribution of the authors, especially for the thesis of the article. On line 94 there is probably an error for the condition, see attached file.

Figures should be self-commenting. In the reviewer's opinion, Figure 1 should contain descriptions of variables used in the equations, as well as memory parameters.

On line 86, Remark 1: provides more flexibility of the design and thus relaxes sufficient conditions. It should be clarified. By the way, there is a typo in the word: flexibility.

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf