Next Article in Journal
Expression Pattern and Functional Analysis of MebHLH149 Gene in Response to Cassava Bacterial Blight
Previous Article in Journal
Nutrient Allocation and Growth Responses of Senegalia polyphylla under Varied Fertilizer Regimes for Effective Forest Recovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endophyte Inoculation and Elevated Potassium Supply on Productivity, Growth and Physiological Parameters of Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes over Contrasting Seasons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unraveling the Hidden Potential of Barley (Hordeum vulgare): An Important Review

by
Avneet Kaur
1,
Sukhvinder Singh Purewal
2,
Yuthana Phimolsiripol
3 and
Sneh Punia Bangar
4,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University Institute of Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
2
University Centre for Research & Development (UCRD), Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
3
Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand
4
Department of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(17), 2421; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172421
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Barley: A Versatile Crop for Sustainable Food Production)

Abstract

:
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is a winter crop well known for its small-seeded grains and self-pollinating characteristics. The flour derived from barley grains plays a crucial role in numerous processed food items, contributing to their taste and nutritional value. Barley consists of complex carbohydrates (80%), proteins (11.5–14.2%), lipids (4.7–6.8%), β-glucans (3.7–7.7%), and ash (1.8–2.4%). Beyond its other nutrients, barley boasts a good reservoir of phenolic compounds (1.2–2.9 mg/g GAE). This abundance of beneficial compounds positions barley as an attractive industrial substrate. In this review, the nutritional composition and bioactive profile of barley are discussed in a systemic manner, emphasizing its potential in the development of innovative barley-based products that promote health and well-being. By incorporating barley into various food formulations, industries can not only boost nutritional content but also offer consumers a wide range of health benefits. In conclusion, barley’s diverse applications in food and health highlight its essential role in promoting healthier living.

1. Introduction

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) stands as an important grain crop among cereal grains for its remarkable nutritional profile. Barley grains are characterized by a unique blend of macronutrients, micronutrients, and bioactive compounds [1]. Macronutrients such as carbohydrates, the primary energy source that fuels bodily functions, are inherent elements of barley grains. A unique blend of macro- and micronutrients makes barley an important industrial substrate for commercial usage [2,3,4]. Barley consists of complex carbohydrates (80%), proteins (11.5–14.2%), lipids (4.7–6.8%), β-glucan (3.7–7.7%), and ash (1.8–2.4%). Starch is the most prevalent nutrient in barley, accounting for 70% of the kernel’s total dry weight [5,6,7]. Soluble fibers, particularly β-glucan, offer a symphony of cardiovascular benefits, while insoluble fibers uphold the fortifications of digestive health. The growing interest in natural antioxidants is driven by the remarkable radical scavenging potential exhibited by phytochemicals, particularly phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and tannins, abundant in barley [8,9,10,11]. Recent scientific research underscores the necessity of a synergistic blend of phytochemicals sourced from cereal grains to counteract the detrimental effects of free radicals, implicated in various diseases [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Barley flour, whether processed or unprocessed, finds promising applications as a substitute for wheat flour in select functional foods, bakery products, and household recipes. This review paper helps to elucidate the nutritional composition along with bioactive phytochemicals and health-benefiting potential of barley.

2. Barley Production Status

The data regarding the area under cultivation, production, and yield of barley in India and across the globe from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 2024, as outlined in Table 1 and Table 2 [19]. Leading the global production figures are countries such as the Russian Federation, Australia, France, Germany, and Canada (Figure 1). The maximum global barley production was reached in 2019, totaling 158,827,743 tons, while the lowest was observed in 2012, with a production of 132,412,417 tons. The fluctuation in global barley production indicates the influence of various factors, including climatic conditions, market demand, and technological advancements in agriculture. In India, barley production peaked in 2014 at 1,830,000 tons but declined to its lowest point of 1,371,360 tons by 2022. This decrease can be attributed to changes in agricultural practices, shifts in farmers’ crop preferences, and climatic challenges. While global barley production experienced a notable peak in 2019, India’s production followed a declining trend. This divergence suggests that local factors in India, such as policy changes, market dynamics, and regional climatic conditions, significantly impact barley production independently of global trends. India has the potential to increase its barley production, but achieving this requires addressing specific local challenges and learning from global best practices. By enhancing agricultural support, adopting advanced technologies, and developing climate-resilient strategies, India can potentially reverse the declining trend in barley production and contribute more significantly to the global market.
Barley production in specific countries is shaped by multiple factors, including climatic suitability, advanced agricultural methodologies, economic incentives, and market demand [20,21,22]. Barley thrives in cooler climates, making it an ideal crop for temperate regions like Canada, Russia, and parts of Europe, where climatic conditions are optimal for its cultivation. Countries with advanced agricultural systems, employing modern machinery, efficient irrigation, and innovative crop management strategies, often achieve superior barley yields. This is particularly evident in nations like Germany, France, and Canada. Additionally, barley’s role in crop rotation systems enhances soil fertility and helps manage weeds and pests, further boosting production in areas with sustainable agricultural practices. Government interventions, such as subsidies and supportive policies, make barley cultivation more appealing to farmers, especially in parts of the European Union and Canada. Proximity to major markets and robust export infrastructure also significantly contribute to higher barley production. European nations, in particular, benefit from their strategic location near high-demand markets, facilitating increased production and distribution. Moreover, countries with strong agricultural research capabilities, such as Australia and Canada, invest in developing high-yield, disease-resistant barley varieties. Well-established export markets for barley and its derivative products stimulate continuous production growth to satisfy international demand, solidifying these countries’ positions as leading barley producers [20]. Continuous cultivation without proper soil management leads to degradation, reduced fertility, and lower yields. To counteract this, implementing sustainable practices like crop rotation, cover cropping, and the use of organic amendments is essential for restoring soil health [23,24,25]. Economic factors such as fluctuating market prices and input costs can affect farmers’ willingness to invest in barley production. Establishing cooperatives and farmer networks can improve market access, while government policies and subsidies should support sustainable practices and mitigate price volatility. In water-scarce regions, promoting drought-tolerant barley varieties, efficient irrigation, and rainwater harvesting can help maintain production. Additionally, investing in transportation and storage infrastructure, along with improving market access through policy support and trade agreements, is vital for stabilizing and increasing barley production.

3. Nutritional Profile

Barley has an impressive nutritional profile, making it a valuable addition to a balanced diet. A unique blend of macro- and micronutrients makes it a preferable substrate for food processing industries. The nutritional profile of barley is explained in Table 3.

3.1. Barley Starch

Barley starch primarily comprises two polysaccharides: amylose and amylopectin. Amylose consists of linear glucose units linked by α-1,4-glycosidic bonds, whereas amylopectin is a branched polymer featuring α-1,4 and α-1,6-glycosidic linkages. The ratio of amylose to amylopectin in barley starch varies across cultivars, impacting its physicochemical characteristics [29,30,31]. Barley starch granules demonstrate a characteristic bimodal distribution, comprising A-type and B-type granules, each possessing distinct morphological and crystalline properties. A-type granules are larger and exhibit irregular shapes, while B-type granules are smaller and more spherical. Earlier published scientific studies demonstrated that, for normal starch, the yield ranges from 86.67% to 98.79%, with amylose content between 21.80% and 26.57%, and amylopectin from 64.86% to 77.88% [32,33,34,35,36,37]. The starch granules exhibit a variety of shapes, including oval, cuboidal, and irregular, and their sizes range from 6.96 µm to 30 µm. The X-ray pattern is predominantly A-type, with relative crystallinity between 22.30% and 43.21%. For waxy starch, the yield is between 58.1% and 68.5%, with an extremely high amylose content of 99.81% to 99.39%. The amylopectin content ranges from 0% to 4.5%. The starch granules typically have large pores, and the X-ray pattern remains predominantly A-type [38,39]. High-amylose starch is also mentioned, with yield percentages between 59.7% and 61.9%, amylose content from 38.4% to 44.1%, and amylopectin from 27.74% to 31.04%. The granules often exhibit small pores, with A- and B-type X-ray patterns [40,41]. The unique structural features of barley starch influence its functional properties and applications. Barley starch exhibits unique physicochemical properties, including granule size, morphology, gelatinization, retrogradation, viscosity, pasting behavior, and digestibility. Granule size distribution and morphology affect starch functionality in food and industrial applications [42,43,44,45]. The viscosity and pasting behavior of barley starch influence its suitability for various food formulations and processing methods. Starch modification techniques include physical treatments (e.g., heat–moisture treatment and annealing), chemical modifications (e.g., cross-linking, esterification, and oxidation), and enzymatic modifications (e.g., hydrolysis, transglycosylation, and solid-state fermentation) [46,47,48]. Barley starch finds diverse applications in food and non-food industries due to its unique properties and functionalities. In the food industry, barley starch is used as a thickening agent, gelling agent, stabilizer, and texturizer in various products such as bread, noodles, soups, sauces, desserts, and beverages. It provides texture, mouthfeel, and shelf stability to food formulations and contributes to product quality and sensory attributes. In the non-food sector, barley starch is utilized in pharmaceuticals for tablet binding and coating, in papermaking for paper sizing and coating, and in bioethanol production as a renewable feedstock for fermentation. The versatility and sustainability of barley starch make it an attractive ingredient for a wide range of applications, contributing to the economic value and environmental benefits of barley cultivation [49,50].

3.2. Protein

Barley protein is composed of different fractions, including albumins, globulins, prolamins (gluten), and glutelins, each with unique properties and functionalities. Albumins and globulins are soluble proteins found in barley grains, while prolamins and glutelins are insoluble proteins that form the gluten matrix. The functional properties of barley protein, including solubility, gelation, emulsification, foaming, and water-holding capacity, are influenced by its structural characteristics, such as molecular weight distribution, secondary structure, and surface hydrophobicity. These functional properties make barley protein suitable for a wide range of food and non-food applications [51,52]. Protein content in barley ranges from 8% to 13%, synthesized during grain development in the endosperm and aleurone layer. Hordein, the main storage protein, constitutes 40–50% of barley’s protein and is rich in glutamine and proline. Glutelin, the second most abundant protein, comprises 35–45% of the total storage protein [53,54,55]. Protein Z, a significant barley albumin and member of the serpin protein group, accounts for about 5% of the albumin content. The protein content in barley is critical for assessing malting and brewing quality. Higher protein levels result in lower carbohydrate content, reducing extract yield and enzyme activity. Conversely, lower protein levels can negatively affect yeast nutrition, enzymatic activity, and fermentable sugar production, also leading to poor extract yield. Variability in barley protein content is influenced by factors such as cultivar, environmental conditions, and fertilizer use. Barley, used in both raw and malted forms, is often blended with rice and corn [56]. Barley contains prolamin storage proteins called hordeins, which vary by molecular weight and location. A-hordeins have a molecular weight of 12–26 kDa, B-hordeins range from 36 to 45 kDa, C-hordeins range from 59 to 72 kDa, and D-hordeins have a molecular weight of approximately 100 kDa [57,58,59,60]. Barley protein has diverse applications in various industries, including food, animal feed, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and bioplastics. In the food industry, barley protein is used as a functional ingredient in products such as bread, pasta, cereal bars, beverages, and meat analogs. It provides texture, structure, and nutritional value to food formulations and contributes to product quality and sensory attributes. In the animal feed industry, barley protein is utilized as a protein source in feed formulations for livestock, poultry, and aquaculture. It serves as a sustainable alternative to traditional protein sources such as soybean meal and fishmeal. In the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, barley protein is used in the formulation of pharmaceuticals, skincare products, and haircare products due to its moisturizing, emollient, and film-forming properties [54,61]. Barley protein is being explored as a renewable and biodegradable material for the production of bioplastics, packaging materials, and biomaterials. Research and innovation in processing technologies, product development, and market expansion are essential to maximize the utilization of barley protein and enhance its value as a sustainable protein source in a rapidly growing global market. Understanding the structure, composition, functionality, and applications of barley protein is crucial for optimizing its utilization and meeting the increasing demand for nutritious and sustainable protein sources [62].

3.3. Fibers

Barley fibers consist of both insoluble fibers (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) and soluble fibers (β-glucans). Insoluble fibers contribute to fecal bulking and promote regular bowel movements, while soluble fibers form viscous gels in the gastrointestinal tract, slowing down digestion and absorption of nutrients [63,64,65]. Barley β-glucans, a type of soluble fiber, have garnered significant attention due to their cholesterol-lowering and immunomodulatory effects. Barley fibers possess unique physicochemical properties, including water-holding capacity, swelling capacity, viscosity, and fermentability [66,67]. Barley fibers are resistant to enzymatic digestion in the small intestine and are fermented by beneficial gut microbiota in the colon, producing short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites with health-promoting effects. The consumption of barley fibers has been associated with numerous health benefits, including improved digestion, weight management, glycemic control, and cardiovascular health. Barley fibers promote satiety and reduce energy intake, thereby aiding in weight management and obesity prevention. They also modulate blood glucose levels and insulin sensitivity, making them beneficial for individuals with diabetes or at risk of developing diabetes [2,68,69,70]. In the dietary supplement industry, barley fibers are utilized in the formulation of fiber supplements, prebiotics, and digestive health products. Barley fibers are valuable and versatile ingredients with significant health benefits and diverse applications in food and non-food industries. Their unique physicochemical properties and physiological effects make them ideal for promoting human health and sustainability. Further research and innovation in processing technologies, product development, and market expansion are essential to maximize the utilization of barley fibers and enhance their value as functional and sustainable ingredients in a rapidly evolving global market [71,72]. Barley β-glucan is a soluble dietary fiber that has gained widespread attention for its health-promoting properties. It is a polysaccharide composed of glucose units linked together by beta-glycosidic bonds. It has a linear backbone with occasional branching, resulting in a complex three-dimensional structure. The molecular weight, degree of branching, and solubility of barley β-glucan can vary depending on factors such as barley variety, processing methods, and extraction techniques. Barley β-glucan exhibits a range of physiological effects in the human body, primarily due to its unique structural properties. As a soluble fiber, barley β-glucan forms viscous gels in the gastrointestinal tract, which can delay gastric emptying, slow glucose absorption, and reduce cholesterol reabsorption. Additionally, barley β-glucan acts as a prebiotic, promoting the growth of beneficial gut bacteria and improving gut health [65,73,74]. It acts as a prebiotic, providing fermentable substrates for beneficial gut bacteria, which produce short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites with health-promoting effects [75,76,77,78].

3.4. Vitamins and Minerals

Barley is a good source of essential vitamins, including B-vitamins (thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, pantothenic acid, pyridoxine, biotin, folate, and cobalamin), vitamin E, and vitamin K. Vitamin E is a potent antioxidant that protects cells from oxidative damage, while vitamin K plays a crucial role in blood clotting and bone metabolism [3]. Barley is an important cereal grain that possesses different tocols, especially α-tocotrienols and α-tocopherols. Vitamin E content in barley ranges from 8.5 to 31.5 µg/g dry weight and is influenced by both storage conditions and genotype. Lower Vitamin E levels are often found in genotypes with pigmentation or hulls [79,80]. The highest concentrations of tocols are located in the endosperm, hull, and germ of barley, with levels of 95%, 63%, and 10%, respectively [81]. Barley is also rich in essential minerals, including potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, calcium, iron, zinc, copper, manganese, and selenium. These minerals are involved in numerous physiological processes, such as muscle contraction, nerve transmission, bone formation, blood clotting, oxygen transport, enzyme activation, and immune function [82]. The consumption of barley grass, rich in vitamins and minerals, may help prevent nutrient deficiencies and reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cancer [83].

3.5. Bioactive Phytochemicals

The term “bioactive phytochemicals” refers to a combination of active components found naturally, each with solubility specific to the solvent used [84,85]. Beyond its role as a dietary staple, barley is recognized for its rich content of bioactive compounds, which contribute to its nutritional value and health-promoting antioxidant properties. These include hydroxybenzoic acids (e.g., gallic acid), hydroxycinnamic acids (e.g., ferulic acid), flavonoids (e.g., quercetin and kaempferol), and lignans. Barley contains a diverse range of flavonoids, including flavonols, flavones, flavanones, and anthocyanins. These compounds exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties. Table 4 represents TPC values in barley extracts, and Table 5 demonstrates the pharmaceutical potential of barley phytochemicals. Barley grains, along with their bran and husk components, contain a variety of bioactive phytochemicals, including total phenolic compounds (TPC), condensed tannin content (CTC), flavonoids, tocopherols, and alkylresorcinols [1,86,87,88]. The reported TPC levels in barley cultivars range from 1.95 to 2.20 mg GAE/g dwb [89], 2.09 to 2.94 mg GAE/dwb [1], and 3.07 to 4.43 mg FAE/g [90]. Madhujith and Shahidi [91] found TPC values ranging from 2.63 to 4.51 mg FAE/g. The composition of TPC in barley may vary due to factors such as temperature, pH, soil type, moisture content, fertilizer use, and harvest stage. Additionally, barley grains contain flavanols such as myricetin, catechin, and procyanidin B3 [92]. Sharma and Gujral [86] reported total flavonoid content (TFC) in barley ranging from 1.38 to 2.24 mg CE/g dwb. CTC in barley cultivars ranges from 0.40 to 0.99 mg CE/g dwb [1], while Collins [93] reported 0.74 mg/g tannins in barley. Specific bioactive phytochemicals in barley have been identified using techniques such as HPLC and HPTLC, revealing the presence of gallic acid, ferulic acid, o-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, cinnamic acid, and caffeic acid [16,94,95,96,97,98,99].

4. Barley-Based Food Products

Barley-based bread is a popular food product made from barley flour or barley-based blends (Figure 2). It offers a nutritious alternative to traditional wheat bread, with higher fiber content, lower glycemic index, and enhanced flavor profile. Barley-based pasta is another popular food product that offers a nutritious alternative to traditional wheat pasta. It is typically made from a blend of barley flour and durum wheat semolina, providing a unique texture and flavor profile. Barley-based pasta is rich in dietary fiber, protein, vitamins, and minerals, making it a nutritious choice for pasta lovers seeking healthier options [121,122]. This product category includes a variety of shapes and forms, such as spaghetti, penne, fusilli, and lasagna, catering to diverse culinary preferences and dietary needs. Barley-based cereal bars and snacks are convenient and portable food products that offer a nutritious and satisfying snack option for on-the-go consumption [62]. Barley-based beverages encompass a wide range of products, including barley water, barley tea, barley coffee substitutes, and barley-based milk alternatives [123]. Barley-based dairy alternatives, such as barley milk and barley yogurt, are emerging as plant-based alternatives to traditional dairy products. These products are made from barley grains, barley malt extract, or barley flour, combined with water, emulsifiers, stabilizers, and flavorings [62]. Fermentation enhances the flavor, aroma, and nutritional value of barley-based foods while also promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and enzymes. These fermented products offer unique culinary experiences and potential health benefits associated with probiotics and bioactive compounds. Barley can be processed into a variety of snack foods, including roasted barley snacks, popped barley chips, and barley crackers. These snacks offer a crunchy texture, savory flavor, and nutritional benefits, making them a popular choice for guilt-free snacking [124,125]. Barley-based snack foods are often marketed as gluten-free, whole grain options, appealing to health-conscious consumers looking for convenient and satisfying snacks. Barley is also used as an ingredient in pet foods, including dog and cat kibble, treats, and supplements. It provides carbohydrates, fiber, protein, vitamins, and minerals to support the nutritional needs of pets [126]. Barley-based pet foods may be formulated for specific life stages, dietary preferences, or health conditions, catering to the diverse needs of companion animals. Fermented barley could also be used in the preparation of antioxidant-rich food supplements [127]. The future scope and novel uses of barley are presented in Table 6.

5. Health Benefits of Barley

Several studies have demonstrated that the regular consumption of barley or barley-derived products can lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and stroke. Barley arabinoxylan has been investigated for its potential to regulate lipid and glucose metabolism and promote digestive health [128,129,130]. Recent research focused on its hypoglycemic effects in mice, showing that a single dose of arabinoxylan extract followed by a glucose solution resulted in suppressed blood glucose elevation over 12 weeks [129]. Arabinoxylan, alongside β-glucan, was found to enhance GLP-1 secretion mediated by SCFAs upon barley consumption, suggesting its role in managing type 2 diabetes [130]. Soluble fibers derived from barley, when fed to rats with type 2 diabetes, effectively lowered postprandial blood glucose, improved insulin sensitivity, and reduced body weight [63]. The presence of propionic acid, linked to improved glucose regulation and insulin response, was attributed to the promotion of Akkermansia growth by soluble arabinoxylan [131]. Additionally, arabinoxylan and β-glucan were found to promote the growth of butyrate-producing bacteria, contributing to enhanced gut microbiota diversity compared to purer fiber extracts [132]. These fibers also exhibited beneficial effects on liver function, increasing HDL cholesterol, and decreasing serum malondialdehyde levels, indicating potential antioxidant and cardioprotective properties, similar to those observed with β-glucan intake [130]. Arabinoxylan extracted from brewer’s spent grain demonstrated notable prebiotic effects by increasing levels of beneficial gut bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria [131]. Regarding its food applications, barley arabinoxylan shows promise as a versatile ingredient across various food products. In bread and bakery items, it can act as a viscosity modulator, enhance structure, and reduce the glycemic index, catering to individuals with diabetes [129]. It can also facilitate the production of low-calorie, high-fiber bread and pasta products and aid in fat and sugar reduction due to its bulk effect and binding capacity [133,134]. Moreover, barley arabinoxylan enhances the texture and satisfaction of cereal-based snacks, reduces fat content, and can be incorporated into functional foods like snack bars for increased fiber content and enhanced satiety [135,136]. In sports drinks and supplements, it can be formulated into concentrated fiber shots or blended with other ingredients to meet specific dietary needs for athletes. Additionally, it finds applications in ready-to-eat meals, dairy products, and processed meats, where it improves texture, stability, and moisture retention while promoting gut health [137].
Animal experiments and clinical trials have provided additional support for the potential anti-obesity effects of barley (HB) and its extracts. For instance, a study by Gong et al. [138] demonstrated that feeding germ-free obese mice a diet containing 46% whole barley for 9 weeks led to symptom alleviation, primarily by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and enriching gut microbiota. Similarly, Deng et al. [139] found that administering whole barley grain orally improved obesity symptoms in the db/db mice model, with mechanisms involving the regulation of the AMPK/SREBP-1c/FAS pathway and fermentation by cecal microbiota. Certain cecal bacteria, such as Prevotella and Anaerovibrio, were found to produce more short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), with their enrichment observed in obese mice consuming whole grain Qingke diet [140]. Studies have also shown that barley β-glucans have beneficial effects on fatty liver and insulin sensitivity in high-fat diet-fed mice [141]. Upon comparing a high-fat–sucrose diet made with refined wheat flour to one substituted with whole grain barley, significant reductions in fat deposits were observed in rats and mice models [138,142]. Additionally, a randomized double-blind human study by Aoe et al. [75] found that barley rich in β-glucan significantly reduced visceral fat area, BMI, and waist circumference in obese Japanese subjects over 12 weeks. Liu et al. [143] observed that barley intake reduced postprandial changes in glucose and insulin levels, potentially preventing early diabetes development. This trial indicated that barley could modulate metabolic dysregulation, possibly through the activation of the gut hormone GLP-1. Barley contains various bioactive compounds, including antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals, that have been shown to possess anticancer properties. These compounds help neutralize free radicals, inhibit the growth of cancer cells, and reduce inflammation. Studies suggest that the regular consumption of barley may lower the risk of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Elevated blood cholesterol levels significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is widely recognized that soluble dietary fiber, particularly β-glucan found in barley and oats, plays a crucial role in preventing heart disease [3,144]. Unlike other cereals like rice, maize, and wheat, barley is considered a good source of β-glucan. Research suggests that barley is comparable to oats in effectively lowering cholesterol levels. Delaney et al. [145] observed decreased aortic cholesterol and increased fecal neutral cholesterol in hamsters fed with 8 g/100 g β-glucan sourced from barley or oats. Soluble β-glucan, a key component found in oat or barley seeds, is believed to contribute to cholesterol reduction. It functions by increasing intestinal viscosity, thereby slowing the absorption of dietary oils. Moreover, β-glucan binds to bile acids, promoting their discharge, which stimulates the body to replace cholesterol. Tocopherol and tocotrienol have also been shown to reduce cholesterol levels, offering further benefits in preventing and treating cardiovascular disease and cancer when incorporated into healthy diets. Dietary fiber, recognized for its role in mitigating CVD risks, enhancing satiety, and improving gastrointestinal immunity, has garnered attention for its potential anticancer effects. Research on the anticancer properties of barley (HB) has mainly focused on colon and liver cancer prevention. Studies suggest that HB polysaccharides inhibit proliferation and induce the apoptosis of cancer cells, potentially through the regulation of reactive oxygen species and transcription factors. Additionally, β-glucan exhibits potent antitumor effects by interacting with receptors in macrophages and modulating immune responses. Both high- and low-molecular-weight β-glucan from barley show promise in cancer immunotherapy, with low-molecular-weight β-glucan promoting dendritic cell maturation, a crucial component of the immune system’s response to tumors [146]. Phenolic extracts from barley demonstrate antiproliferative effects on liver cancer cells, with free forms showing better activity compared to bound forms. Bioactive compounds such as GABA and tocotrienols exhibit potential anticancer properties [147,148,149,150].

6. Conclusions

Barley-based food products offer a diverse range of nutritious and flavorful options for consumers seeking healthier and more sustainable dietary choices. These products are rich in fiber, protein, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, which contribute to their nutritional value and health-promoting properties. Market trends indicate a growing demand for barley-based food products, driven by increasing consumer awareness of the health benefits of whole grains and plant-based foods, as well as growing concerns about sustainability. To fully capitalize on this potential, research must focus on optimizing barley’s nutritional profile through selective breeding and advanced processing technologies, ensuring the retention of health-promoting compounds. Effective consumer education and product characterization will further promote barley’s integration into health benefiting diverse diets.

Author Contributions

A.K.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. S.S.P.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. Y.P.: Writing—review and editing, project administration. S.P.B.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India, for providing a peaceful working environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Salar, R.K.; Purewal, S.S.; Sandhu, K.S. Relationships between DNA damage protection activity, total phenolic content, condensed tannin content and antioxidant potential among Indian barley cultivars. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 11, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boukid, F. Comprehensive review of barley dietary fibers with Emphasis on arabinoxylans. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2024, 31, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raj, R.; Shams, R.; Pandey, V.K.; Dash, K.K.; Singh, P.; Bashir, O. Barley phytochemicals and health promoting benefits: A comprehensive review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lazaridou, A.; Kotsiou, K.; Biliaderis, C.G. Nutritional and technological aspects of barley β-glucan enriched biscuits containing isomaltulose as sucrose replacer. Food Hydrocoll. Health 2022, 2, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Asare, E.K.; Jaiswal, S.; Maley, J.; Båga, M.; Sammynaiken, R.; Rossnagel, B.G.; Chibbar, R.N. Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in-vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 4743–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baik, B.K.; Ullrich, S.E. Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. Cereal. Sci. 2008, 48, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.H.; Vasanthan, T.; Rossnagel, B.; Hoover, R. Starch from hull-less barley: II. Thermal, rheological and acid hydrolysis characteristics. Food Chem. 2001, 74, 407–415. [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh, A.; Izydorczyk, M.; Koksel, F. Pilot scale air classification of flours from hulled and hull-less barley for the production of protein enriched ingredients. J. Cereal. Sci. 2024, 117, 103880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Razzaq, H.A.A.; Pezzuto, M.; Santagata, G.; Silvestre, C.; Cimmino, S.; Larsen, N.; Duraccio, D. Barley β-glucan-protein based bioplastic film with enhanced physicochemical properties for packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shewry, P.R. Chapter 7—Minor Components of the Barley Grain: Minerals, Lipids, Terpenoids, Phenolics, and Vitamins. In Barley, 2nd ed.; Chemistry and Technology American Associate of Cereal Chemists International: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2014; pp. 169–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shahidi, F.; Nackz, M. Food Phenolics: Sources, Chemistry, Effects and Applications; Technomic Publishing Company Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 1995; pp. 281–319. [Google Scholar]
  12. Matsumura, Y.; Kitabatake, M.; Kayano, S.; Ito, T. Dietary Phenolic Compounds: Their Health Benefits and Association with the Gut Microbiota. Antiox 2023, 12, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic Potential of Phenolic Compounds in Medicinal Plants—Natural Health Products for Human Health. Molecule 2023, 28, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baba, W.N.; Rashid, I.; Shah, A.; Ahmad, M.; Gani, A.; Masodi, F.A.; Wani, I.A.; Wani, S.M. Effect of microwave roasting on antioxidant and anticancerous activities of barley flour. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2016, 15, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gani, A.; Wani, S.M.; Masoodi, F.A.; Hameed, G. Whole-Grain Cereal Bioactive Compounds and Their Health Benefits: A Review. J. Food Process. Technol. 2012, 3, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dvorakova, M.; Douanier, M.; Jurkova, M.; Kellner, V.; Dostalek, P. Comparison of antioxidant activity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and malt extracts with the content of free phenolic compounds measured by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with CoulArray detector. J. Ins. Brew. 2008, 114, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manzoor, M.; Ahmad, M.; Zafar, M.; Gillani, S.W.; Shaheen, H.; Pieroni, A.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Elshikh, M.S.; Saqib, S.; Makhkamov, T.; et al. The local medicinal plant knowledge in Kashmir Western Himalaya: A way to foster ecological transition via community-centred health seeking strategies. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2023, 19, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Asghar, M.; Younas, M.; Arshad, B.; Zaman, W.; Asma, A.; Rasheed, S.; Shah, A.H.; Ullah, F.; Saqib, S. Bioactive potential of cultivated Mentha arvensis L. for preservation and production of health-oriented food. J. Animal Plant Sci. 2022, 32, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations). 2024. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/beta/en/#data/QC (accessed on 1 April 2024).
  20. Tricase, C.; Amicarelli, V.; Lamonaca, E.; Rana, R.L. Chapter-2 Economic analysis of the barley market and related uses. Grasses Food Feed. 2018, 10, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bindereif, S.G.; Rüll, F.; Kolb, P.; Köberle, L.; Willms, H.; Steidele, S.; Schwarzinger, S.; Gebauer, G. Impact of global climate change on the european barley market requires novel multi-method approaches to preserve crop quality and authenticity. Foods 2021, 10, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mitrofanov, D.V.; Zorov, A.A.; Skorokhodov, V.Y.; Kaftan, Y.V.; Zenkova, N.A. The influence of main factors on productivity of barley in the steppe zone of the Southern Urals. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1045, 012105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Shammary, A.A.G.; Al-Shihmani, L.S.S.; Fernandez-Galvez, J.; Caballero-Calvo, A. Optimizing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review of agronomic practices and their impacts on soil attributes. J. Environ. Res. 2024, 364, 121487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tahat, M.M.; Alananbeh, K.M.; Othman, Y.A.; Leskovar, D.I. Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodriguez, B.C.; Duran-Zuazo, V.H.; Rodriguez, M.S.; Garcia-Tejero, I.F.; Ruiz, B.G.; Tavira, S.C. Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hussain, A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Hussain, Z.; Manzoor, M.F.; Hussain, A.; Ali, A.; Mahmood, T.; Abbasi, K.S.; Karrar, E.; et al. Tajudin Compositional profile of barley landlines grown in different regions of Gilgit-Baltistan. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 2605–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rani, M.; Singh, G.; Siddiqi, R.A.; Gill, B.S.; Sogi, D.S.; Bhat, M.A. Comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical, technological, and protein profiling of wheat, rye, and barley cereals. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 694679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ge, X.; Jing, L.; Zhao, K.; Su, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Yu, X.; Li, W. The phenolic compounds profile, quantitative analysis and antioxidant activity of four naked barley grains with different color. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gielens, D.R.S.; Schepper, C.F.D.; Langenaeken, N.A.; Galant, A.; Courtin, C.M. A global set of barley varieties shows a high diversity in starch structural properties and related gelatinisation characteristics. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gebre, B.A.; Xu, Z.; Ma, M.; Lakew, B.; Sui, Z.; Corke, H. Starch molecular structure, physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of Ethiopian malt barley varieties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, W.; Ding, L.; Guo, K.; Liu, Y.; Wen, X.; Kirkensgaard, J.J.K.; Khakimov, B.; Enemark-Rasmussen, K.; Hebelstrup, K.H.; Herburger, K.; et al. The relationship between starch structure and digestibility by time-course digestion of amylopectin-only and amylose-only barley starches. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 139, 108491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, X.; Zhu, J.; Dong, W.; Sun, Y.; Lv, C.; Guo, B.; Xu, R. Comparison of pasting properties measured from the whole grain flour and extracted starch in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mehfooz, T.; Ali, T.M.; Hasnain, A. Effect of cross-linking on characteristics of succinylated andoxidized barley starch. J. Food Measure Charac. 2019, 13, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, K.; Zhang, B.; Chen, L.; Li, X.; Zheng, B. Hierarchical structure and physicochemical properties of highland barley starch following heat moisture treatment. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kaur, H.; Gill, B.S.; Karwasra, B.L. In vitro digestibility, pasting, and structural properties of starches from different cereals. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yangcheng, H.; Gong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jane, J.L. Pysicochemical properties of Tibetan hull-less barley starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. El-Halal, S.L.M.; Colussi, R.; Pinto, V.Z.; Bartz, J.; Radunz, M.; Carreño, N.L.V.; da-Rosa Zavareze, E. Structure, morphology and functionality of acetylated and oxidized barley starches. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gao, J.; Vasanthan, T.; Hoover, R. Isolation and characterization of high-purity starch isolates from regular, waxy, and high-amylose hulless barley grains. Cereal Chem. 2009, 86, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Waduge, R.N.; Hoover, R.; Vasanthan, T.; Gao, J.; Li, J. Effect of annealing on the structure and physicochemical properties of barley starches of varying amylose content. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Morrison, W.R.; Milligan, T.P.; Azudin, M.N. A relationship between the amylose and lipid contents of starches from diploid cereals. J. Cereal Sci. 1984, 2, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, J.; Chung, H.J.; Park, H.Y.; Park, H.J.; Oh, S.K. Comparative analysis of malt quality and starch characteristics of three South Korean barley cultivars. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 33, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gidlof, Z.; Pedersen, B.L.; Nilsson, L.; Teleman, A.; Wahlgren, M.; Millgvist-Fureby, A. Utilising phase diagram to understand barley starch microsphere preparation in an aqueous two-phase system. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 658, 130652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, S.; Li, X.; Hu, G.; Liang, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, Q. Rheological behaviors, structural properties and freeze–thaw stability of normal and waxy genotypes of barley starch: A comparative study with mung bean, potato, and corn starches. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Punia, S. Barley starch: Structure, properties and in vitro digestibility—A review. Int. J Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 868–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kallman, A.; Bertoft, E.; Koch, K.; Sun, C.; Aman, P.; Andersson, R. Starch structure in developing barley endosperm. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Purewal, S.S.; Siroha, A.K.; Salar, R.K.; Kaur, A.; Singh, R.S.; Kennedy, J.F.; Bangar, S.P. Influence of solid-state fermentation on the functional characteristics of pearl millet starch: An innovative and cost-efficient approach to modify starch. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 7, 100449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bangar, S.P.; Purewal, S.S.; Trif, M.; Maqsood, S.; Kumar, M.; Manjunatha, V.; Rusu, A.V. Functionality and Applicability of Starch-Based Films: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Foods 2021, 10, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sandhu, K.S.; Siroha, A.K.; Punia, S.; Sangwan, L.; Nehra, M.; Purewal, S.S. Effect of degree of cross linking on physicochemical, rheological and morphological properties of sorghum starch. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vasanthan, T.; Hoover, R. Chapter 16—Barley Starch: Production, Properties, Modification and Uses. In Starch, 3rd ed.; Chemistry and Technology Food Science and Technology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 601–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Devi, R.; Singh, A.; Dutta, D.; Sit, N. Physicochemical properties of barley starch and effect of substitution of wheat flour with barley starch on texture and sensory properties of bread. eFood 2024, 5, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lyu, Y.; Ma, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, X. A systematic review of highland barley: Ingredients, health functions and applications. Grain Oil Sci. Technol. 2022, 5, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dutta, M.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Nandy, P.; Paul, A. A review on products from barley. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 1718–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Senarathna, S.; Mel, R.; Malalgoda, M. Utilization of cereal-based protein ingredients in food applications. J. Cereal Sci. 2024, 116, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jaeger, A.; Zannini, E.; Sahin, A.W.; Arendt, E.K. Barley protein properties, extraction and applications, with a focus on brewers’ spent grain protein. Foods 2021, 10, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sullivan, P.; Arendt, E.; Gallagher, E. The increasing use of barley and barley by-products in the production of healthier baked goods. Trend Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, G.; Li, C. Genetics and Improvement of Barley Malt Quality; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  57. Faulks, A.J.; Shewry, P.R.; Miflin, B.J. The polymorphism and structural homology of storage polypeptides (hordein) coded by the Hot 2 locus in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Biochem. Genet. 1981, 19, 841–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shewry, P.R.; Finch, R.A.; Parmar, S.; Franklin, J.; Miflin, B.J. Chromosomal location of HOR 3, A new locus governing storage proteins in barley. Heredity 1983, 50, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shewry, P.R.; Kreis, M.; Parmar, S.; Lew, E.J.L.; Kasarda, D.D. Identification of g-type hordeins in barley. FEBS Lett. 1985, 190, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qi, J.C.; Zhang, G.P.; Zhou, M.X. Protein and hordein content in barley seeds as affected by nitrogen level and their relationship to beta-amylase activity. J. Cereal Sci. 2006, 43, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lukinac, J.; Jukic, M. Barley in the Production of Cereal-Based Products. Plants 2022, 11, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guo, T.; Horvath, C.; Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Zheng, B. Understanding the nutrient composition and nutritional functions of highland barley (Qingke): A review. Trend Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, L.; Pan, M.; Pan, S.; Li, W.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, J.; Nie, S.P. Effects of insoluble and soluble fibers isolated from barley on blood glucose, serum lipids, liver function and caecal short-chain fatty acids in type 2 diabetic and normal rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 135, 110937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khoury, D.E.; Cuda, C.; Luhovyy, B.L.; Anderson, G.H. Beta glucan: Health benefits in obesity and metabolic syndrome. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 851362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lattimer, J.M.; Haub, M.D. Effects of dietary fiber and its components on metabolic health. Nutrients 2010, 2, 1266–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Singla, A.; Gupta, O.P.; Sagwal, V.; Kumar, A.; Patwa, N.; Mohan, N.; Ankush; Kumar, D.; Vir, O.; Singh, J.; et al. Beta-glucan as a soluble dietary fiber source: Origins, biosynthesis, extraction, purification, structural characteristics, bioavailability, biofunctional attributes, industrial utilization, and global trade. Nutrients 2024, 16, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ahmad, A.; Anjum, F.M.; Zahoor, T.; Nawaz, H.; Din, A. Physicochemical and functional properties of barley β-glucan as affected by different extraction procedures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jurkaninova, L.; Dvoracek, V.; Gregusova, V.; Havrlentova, M. Cereal β-D-glucans in food processing applications and nanotechnology research. Food 2024, 13, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lante, A.; Canazza, E.; Tessari, P. Beta-glucans of cereals: Functional and technological properties. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kaur, A.; Purewal, S.S. Modulation of Cereal Biochemistry via Solid-State Fermentation: A Fruitful Way for Nutritional Improvement. Fermentation 2023, 9, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bangar, S.P.; Sandhu, K.S.; Purewal, S.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, P.; Siroha, A.K.; Kumari, K.; Singh, M.; Kumar, M. Fermented barley bran: An improvement in phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties. J. Food Process. Preser. 2022, 46, e15543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jha, R.; Mishra, P. Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kaur, R.; Sharma, M.; Ji, D.; Xu, M.; Agyei, D. Structural features, modification, and functionalities of beta-glucan. Fibers 2019, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tudorica, C.M.; Jones, T.E.R.; Kuri, V.; Brennan, C.S. The effects of refined barley beta-glucan on the physico-structural properties of low-fat dairy products: Curd yield, microstructure, texture and rheology. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aoe, S.; Mio, K.; Yamanaka, C.; Kuge, T. Low Molecular Weight Barley β-Glucan Affects Glucose and Lipid Metabolism by Prebiotic Effects. Nutrients 2021, 13, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Murphy, E.J.; Rezoagli, E.; Major, I.; Rowan, N.J.; Laffey, J.G. β-Glucan metabolic and immunomodulatory properties and potential for clinical application. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thandapilly, S.J.; Ndou, S.P.; Wang, Y.; Nyachoti, C.M.; Ames, N.P. Barley β-glucan increases fecal bile acid excretion and short chain fatty acid levels in mildly hypercholesterolemic individuals. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 3092–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y.; Harding, S.V.; Thandapilly, S.J.; Tosh, S.M.; Hones, P.J.H. Barley β-glucan reduces blood cholesterol levels via interrupting bile acid metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 2017, 118, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rico, D.; Penas, E.; Garcia, M.C.; Martinez-Villaluenga, C.; Rai, D.K.; Birsan, R.I.; Frias, J.; Martin-Diana, A.B. Sprouted barley flour as a nutritious and functional ingredient. Foods 2020, 9, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bangar, S.P.; Sandhu, K.S.; Trif, M.; Rusu, A.; Pop, I.D.; Kumar, M. Enrichment in different health components of barley flour using Twin-Screw extrusion technology to support nutritionally balanced diets. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 823148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zielinski, H. Tocotrienols: Distribution and sources cereals–role in human health. In Tocotrienols: Vitamin E Beyond Tocopherols, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tilahun, Z.; Chandravanshi, B.S.; Redi-Abshiro, M. Mineral contents of barley grains and its processed foods (kolo, porridge, bread and injera) consumed in Ethiopia. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2021, 35, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zeng, Y.; Pu, X.; Yang, J.; Du, J.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, T. Preventive and therapeutic role of functional ingredients of barley grass for chronic diseases in human beings. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2018, 2018, 3232080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kaur, P.; Dhull, S.B.; Sandhu, K.S.; Salar, R.K.; Purewal, S.S. Tulsi (Ocimum tenuiflorum) seeds: In vitro DNA damage protection, bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Meas. 2018, 12, 1530–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dhull, S.B.; Kaur, P.; Purewal, S.S. Phytochemical analysis, phenolic compounds, condensed tannin content and antioxidant potential in Marwa (Origanum majorana) seed extracts. Resour. Effic. Technol. 2016, 2, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sharma, P.; Gujral, H.S. Effect of sand roasting and microwave cooking on antioxidant activity of barley. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tamagawa, K.; Iizuka, A.; Ikeda, A.; Koike, H.; Naganuma, K.; Komiyama, Y. Antioxidative activity of proanthocyanidins isolated from barley bran. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 46, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Panfili, G.; Fratianni, A.; Irano, M. Normal phase high-performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in cereals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3940–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lahouar, L.; Arem, A.E.; Ghrairi, F.; Chahdoura, H.; Salem, H.B.; Felah, M.E.; Achour, L. Phytochemical content and antioxidant properties of diverse varieties of whole barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown in Tunisia. Food Chem. 2014, 145, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sharma, P.; Gujral, H.S. Antioxidant and polyphenol oxidase activity of germinated barley and its milling fractions. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Madhujith, T.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant potential of barley as affected by alkaline hydrolysis and release of insoluble-bound phenolics. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Holtekjolen, A.K.; Kinitz, C.; Knutsen, S.H. Flavanol and bound phenolic acid contents in different barley varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2253–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Collins, F. Oat phenolics: Avenanthramides, novel substituted N-cinnamoylanthranilate alkaloids from oat groats and hulls. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1989, 37, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lin, S.; Guo, H.; Gong, J.D.; Lu, M.; Lu, M.Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, W.; Wu, D.T. Phenolic profiles, β-glucan contents, and antioxidant capacities of colored Qingke (Tibetan hulless barley) cultivars. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 81, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, H.; Dong, J.; Lu, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Shan, L.; Lin, Y.; Fan, W.; Gu, G. Effects of extraction solvent mixtures on antioxidant activity evaluation and their extraction capacity and selectivity for free phenolic compounds in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7277–7286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Quinde-Axtell, Z.; Baik, B.K. Phenolic compounds of barley grain and their implication in food product discoloration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9978–9984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hernanz, D.; Nunez, V.; Sancho, A.I.; Faulds, C.B.; Williamson, G.; Bartolome, B.; Gomez-Cordove, S.C. Hydrocinnamic acids and ferulic acid dehydrodimers in barley and processed barley. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4884–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Weidner, S.; Amarowicz, R.; Karamac, M.; Dabrowski, G. Phenolic acids in caryopses of two cultivars of wheat, rye and triticale that display different resistance to pre-harvest sprouting. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1999, 210, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zupfer, J.M.; Churchill, K.E.; Rasmusson, D.C.; Fulcher, R.G. Variation of ferulic acid concentration among diverse barley cultivars measured by HPLC and microspectrophotometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1350–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Drawbridge, P.C.; Apea-Bah, F.; Hornung, P.S.; Beta, T. Bioaccessibility of phenolic acids in Canadian hulless barley varieties. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Deng, J.; Xiang, Z.; Lin, C.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, T.; Xia, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Identification and quantification of free, esterified, and insoluble-bound phenolics in grains of hulless barley varieties and their antioxidant activities. LWT 2021, 151, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, B.; Nie, C.; Li, T.; Zhao, J.; Fan, M.; Li, Y.; Qian, H.; Wang, L. Effect of boiling and roasting on phenolic components and their bioaccessibilities of highland barley. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162 Pt B, 112137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Suriano, S.; Iannucci, A.; Codianni, P.; Fares, C.; Russo, M.; Pecchioni, N.; Marciello, U.; Savino, M. Phenolic acids profile, nutritional and phytochemical compounds, antioxidant properties in colored barley grown in southern Italy. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Madhujith, T.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidative and antiproliferative properties of selected barley (Hordeum vulgarae L.) cultivars and their potential for inhibition of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol oxidation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 5018–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Punia, S.; Sandhu, K.S. Functional and antioxidant properties of different milling fractions of Indian barley cultivars. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  106. Huerta, R.R.; Saldana, D.A. Pressurized fluid treatment of barley and canola straws to obtain carbohydrates and phenolics. J. Supercrit. Fluid 2018, 141, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mansouri, F.E.L.; Lovillo, M.P.; Farissi, H.E.; Oufdou, H.; Brigui, J. Extraction, analysis of polyphenols and antioxidant properties of morrocan barley seed extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.). Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 43, 1896–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rao, S.; Santhakumar, A.B.; Chinkwo, K.A.; Blanchard, C.L. Q-TOF LC/MS identification and UHPLC-Online ABTS antioxidant activity guided mapping of barley polyphenols. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Xia, C.; Yang, K.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, T.; Chen, J.; Deng, J.; Zhu, B.; Shi, Z.; Xiang, Z. Distribution of free and bound phenolic compounds, β-glucan, and araboxylan in fractions of milled hulless barley. LWT 2022, 169, 113935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Simic, G.; Horvat, D.; Dvojkovic, K.; Abicic, I.; Vuletic, M.V.; Tucak, M.; Lalic, A. Evaluation of Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Malting and Hulless Barley Grain and Malt Extracts. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Niroula, A.; Khatri, S.; Khadka, D.; Timilsina, R. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity profile of selectedcereal sprouts and grasses. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhou, B.; Jin, Z.; Schwarz, P.B.; Li, Y. Efect of grinding and extraction conditions on the determination of antioxidant activity and phenolic acids in barley. Food Meas. 2021, 15, 3823–3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zdunska, K.; Dana, A.; Kolodziejczak, A.; Rotsztejn, H. Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its possible application. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 31, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rashid, N.A.; Abd-Halim, S.A.S.; Teoh, S.L.; Budin, S.B.; Hassan, F.; Adib-Ridzuan, N.R.; Abdul-Jalil, N.A. The role of natural antioxidants in cisplatin-induced hepatotoxicity. Biomed. Pharmacothear. 2021, 144, 112328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tehami, W.; Nani, A.; Khan, N.A.; Hichami, A. New Insights Into the Anticancer Effects of p-Coumaric Acid: Focus on colorectal cancer. Dose Response 2023, 21, 15593258221150704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. 116. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Iahtisham-Ul-Haq; Patel, S.; Pan, X.; Naz, S.; Silva, A.S.; Saeed, F. Proanthocyanidins: A comprehensive review. Biomed. Pharmacothear. 2019, 116, 108999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, X.Q.; Hu, T.; Han, Y.; Huang, W.; Yuan, H.B.; Zhang, Y.T.; Du, Y.; Jiang, Y.W. Preventive effects of catechins on cardiovascular disease. Molecule 2016, 21, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Buscemi, S.; Corleo, D.; Di Pace, F.; Petroni, M.L.; Satriano, A.; Marchesini, G. The effect of lutein on eye and extra-eye health. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Suriano, S.; Iannucci, A.; Codianni, P.; Fares, C.; Menga, V.; Russo, M.; Marciello, U.; Troccoli, A. Carotenoids and tocols content in genotypes of colored barley. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 96, 103110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bouyahya, A.; Omari, N.E.; Hakkur, M.; Hachlafi, N.E.; Charfi, S.; Balahbib, A.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; Rebezov, M.; Maksimiuk, N.; Shariati, M.A.; et al. Sources, health benefits, and biological properties of zeaxanthin. Trend Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 519–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Singh, G.; Singh, B.; Singh, A.; Sharma, S. Functionality of Barley pasta supplemented with Mungbean flour: Cooking behavior, quality characteristics and morphological interactions. Food Meas. 2023, 17, 5806–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Marconi, E.; Graziano, M.; Cubadda, R. Composition and Utilization of Barley Pearling By-Products for Making Functional Pastas Rich in Dietary Fiber and β-Glucans. Cereal Chem. 2000, 77, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Strieder, M.M.; Silva, E.K.; Mekala, S.; Meireles, M.A.A.; Saldana, M.D.A. Barley-Based Non-dairy Alternative Milk: Stabilization Mechanism, Protein Solubility, Physicochemical Properties, and Kinetic Stability. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 2231–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wazed, M.A.; Islam, M.R. Influence of barley, corn and rice flour on physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of gluten-free bread. Malays. Halal Res. J. 2021, 4, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Landschoot, A.V. Gluten-free barley malt beers. Cerevisia 2011, 36, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Badea, A.; Wijekoon, C. Benefits of Barley Grain in Animal and Human Diets. In Cereal Grains; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Purewal, S.S.; Kaur, A.; Salar, R.K. Modulation of phenolic content and antioxidant properties of barley using solid state fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 58, 103225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Mio, K.; Ogawa, R.; Tadenuma, N.; Aoe, S. Arabinoxylan as well as β-glucan in barley promotes GLP-1 secretion by increasing short-chain fatty acids production. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2022, 32, 101343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mio, K.; Togo-Ohno, M.; Tadenuma, N.; Ogawa, R.; Yamanaka, C.; Aoe, S. A single administration of barley β-glucan and arabinoxylan extracts reduces blood glucose levels at the second meal via intestinal fermentation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2022, 87, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Nie, C.; Yan, X.; Xie, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, N.; Luo, Y.; Sa, Z.; et al. Structure of β-glucan from Tibetan hull-less barley and its in vitro fermentation by human gut microbiota. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lynch, K.M.; Strain, C.R.; Johnson, C.; Patangia, D.; Stanton, C.; Koc, F.; Gil-Martinez, J.; Riordan, P.O.; Sahin, A.W.; Ross, R.P.; et al. Extraction and characterisation of arabinoxylan from brewers spent grain and investigation of microbiome modulation potential. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 4393–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Teixiera, C.; Prykhodko, O.; Alminger, M.; Hallenius, F.F.; Nyman, M. Barley Products of Different Fiber Composition Selectively Change Microbiota Composition in Rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1701023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Gasparre, N.; Pasqualone, A.; Mefleh, M.; Boukid, F. Nutritional quality of gluten-free bakery products labeled ketogenic and/or low-carb sold in the global market. Foods 2022, 11, 4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gasparre, N.; Rosell, C.M.; Boukid, F. The growing popularity of low-carb cereal-based products: The lay of the land. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2024, 250, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Boukid Klerks, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Fogliano, V.; Sanchez-Siles, L.; Roman, S.; Vittadini, E. Current and emerging trends in cereal snack bars: Implications for new product development. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 73, 610–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fanari, F.; Comaposada, J.; Boukid, F.; Climent, E.; Claret Coma, A.; Guerrero, L.; Castellari, M. Enhancing energy bars with microalgae: A study on nutritional, physicochemical and sensory properties. J. Funct. Food 2023, 109, 105768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Herrera-Balandrano, D.D.; Báez-González, J.G.; Carvajal-Millán, E.; Méndez-Zamora, G.; Urías-Orona, V.; Amaya-Guerra, C.A.; Niño-Medina, G. Feruloylated arabinoxylans from nixtamalized maize bran byproduct: A functional ingredient in frankfurter sausages. Molecule 2019, 24, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gong, L.; Wang, T.; Sun, C.; Wang, J.; Sun, B. Whole barley prevents obesity and dyslipidemia without the involvement of the gut microbiota in germ free C57BL/6J obese mice. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 7498–7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Deng, N.; He, Z.; Guo, R.; Zheng, B.; Li, T.; Liu, R.H. Highland barley whole grain (Hordeum vulgare L.) ameliorates hyperlipidemia by modulating cecal microbiota, miRNAs, and AMPK pathways in leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 11735–11746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xia, X.; Li, G.; Ding, Y.; Ren, T.; Zheng, J.; Kan, J. Effect of whole grain qingke (Tibetan Hordeum vulgare L. Zangqing 320) on the serum lipid levels and intestinal microbiota of rats under high-fat diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2686–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Choi, J.S.; Kim, H.; Jung, M.H.; Hong, S.; Song, J. Consumption of barley beta- glucan ameliorates fatty liver and insulin resistance in mice fed a high-fat diet. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Xia, X.; Li, G.; Xing, Y.; Ding, Y.; Ren, T.; Kan, J. Antioxidant activity of whole grain highland hull-less barley and its effect on liver protein expression profiles in rats fed with high-fat diets. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 2201–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, C. Postprandial differences in the amino acid and biogenic amines profiles of impaired fasting glucose individuals after intake of highland barley. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5556–5571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Tosh, S.M.; Bordenave, N. Emerging science on benefits of whole grain oat and barley and their soluble dietary fibers for heart health, glycemic response, and gut microbiota. Nutr. Rev. 2021, 78, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Delaney, B.; Nicolosi, R.J.; Wilson, T.A.; Carlson, T.; Frazer, S.; Zheng, G.H.; Hess, R.; Ostergren, K.; Haworth, J.; Knutson, N. Beta-glucan fractions from barley and oats are similarly antiatherogenic in hypercholesterolemic Syrian golden hamsters. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tanioka, A.; An, W.W.; Kuge, T.; Tsubaki, K.; Nakaya, K. Barley low molecular weight β-glucan potently induces maturation of mouse dendritic cells. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 1647–1651. [Google Scholar]
  147. Shen, Y.; Hu, C.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, H. Characteristics of three typical Chinese highland barley varieties: Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Nesaretnam, K.; Guthrie, N.; Chambers, A.F.; Carroll, K.K. Effect of tocotrienols on the growth of a human breast cancer cell line in culture. Lipids 1995, 30, 1139–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Nesaretnam, K.; Stephen, R.; Dils, R.; Darbre, P. Tocotrienols inhibit the growth of human breast cancer cells irrespective of estrogen receptor status. Lipids 1998, 33, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Oh, C.H.; Oh, S.H. Effects of germinated Brown rice extracts with enhanced levels of GABA on cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. J. Med. Food. 2004, 7, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Worldwide top barley producers during 2022 [19].
Figure 1. Worldwide top barley producers during 2022 [19].
Plants 13 02421 g001
Figure 2. Different barley-based food products.
Figure 2. Different barley-based food products.
Plants 13 02421 g002
Table 1. Area, yield, and production of barley during the last ten years (2012–2022) in India [19].
Table 1. Area, yield, and production of barley during the last ten years (2012–2022) in India [19].
Year20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Area (ha)643,000695,000673,500707,000590,000656,250660,800575,600589,570592,470453,320
Yield (100 g/ha)25,19425,18027,17122,81524,40726,62826,94928,37229,20527,95730,251
Production (tons)1,620,0001,750,0001,830,0001,613,0001,440,0001,747,4501,780,8101,633,0701,721,8301,656,3401,371,360
Table 2. Worldwide area, yield, and production of barley during the last ten years (2012–2022) [19].
Table 2. Worldwide area, yield, and production of barley during the last ten years (2012–2022) [19].
Year20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Area (ha)50,049,96250,012,05049,931,70749,049,42548,207,08847,876,90948,057,49651,318,47751,959,89148,781,49747,147,005
Yield
(100 g/ha)
26,45628,73029,09930,24930,30731,01429,34330,94930,18429,75232,850
Production (tons)132,412,417143,683,812145,294,109148,370,300146,101,933148,486,476141,013,838158,827,743156,836,485145,133,126154,877,139
Table 3. Different nutrient components in barley.
Table 3. Different nutrient components in barley.
NutrientConcentrationReferences
Starch50.8–56.3%[26,27]
Crude fat1.6–2.63%
Crude protein11.5–16.2%
Crude fiber11.7–16.5%
Lipids2–3%
Sodium122–146 mg/kg
Calcium312–368 mg/kg
Magnesium527–616 mg/kg
Iron43–66 mg/kg
Zinc22.5–26.6 mg/kg
Histidine2.6–3.2 (g/100 g protein)
Threonine3.2–3.7 (g/100 g protein)
Phenylalanine6.7–9.2 (g/100 g protein)
Methionine1–1.4 (g/100 g protein)
Valine3.4–4.1 (g/100 g protein)
Isoleucine3.5–3.8 (g/100 g protein)
Leucine6.7–7.2 (g/100 g protein)
Lysine2.3–2.8 (g/100 g protein)
Total essential amino acid31.6–32.9 (g/100 g protein)
Biological value85.5–92.7 (g/100 g protein)
Total phenolic content1.2–2.94 mg/g[1]
Chlorogenic acid2.15–16.89 µg/g[26,28]
Gallic acid0.021–0.11 µg/g
Ferulic acid0.047–5.4 µg/g
Protocatechuic acid0.029–0.135 µg/g
Caffeic acid0.05–0.61 µg/g
Hydroxybenzoic acid0.011–1.46 µg/g
p-Coumaric acid0.035–2.41 µg/g
Total flavonoid content0.41–0.55 mg/g
Quercitrin4.78–184 µg/g
Isovitexin1.95–8.88 µg/g
Afzelin1.94–8.58 µg/g
Isoquercitrin1.8–5.08 µg/g
Epicatechin1.5–5.03 µg/g
Vitexin218.8–935.7 µg/g
Hesperidin1.83–4 µg/g
Phloretin0.04–0.165 µg/g
Daidzein0.03–0.06 µg/g
Psoralen0.008–0.014 µg/g
Naringenin0.005–0.227 µg/g
(+)-catechin0.001–3.13 µg/g
Quercetin dihydrate0.004–0.068 µg/g
Rutin0.17–11.9 µg/g
Phlorizin0.06–0.29 µg/g
Glycitein0.002–0.11 µg/g
Table 4. Extraction medium used to recover TPC from barley.
Table 4. Extraction medium used to recover TPC from barley.
SubstrateExtraction Medium
(Solvent Type and Concentration)
TPCReference
Hulless barleyMethanol 80%853.71–2331.93 µg FAE/g [100]
Hulless barleyMethanol 80%152.8–622 µg GAE/g[101]
Hulless barleyMethanol 80%1.12–1.33 mg GAE/g [102]
Colored barleyAcidified methanol2046–2402 µg GAE/g [103]
BarleyEthanol 50%2.09–2.94 mg GAE/g[1]
BarleyAcidified methanol3.07–4.48 mg FAE/g[90]
BarleyMethanol 80%1.36–2.29 mg FAE/g[104]
BarleyMethanol 80%1.95–2.20 mg GAE/g[89]
Barley-3.08–4.25 mg GAE/g[105]
Barley strawEtOH (20–100%)32.6–57.7 mg GAE/g[106]
BarleyAcetone 70%0.30–1.99 mg/g[107]
BarleyEthanol 70%0.30–1.52 mg/g[107]
BarleyMethanol 70%0.27–1.45 mg/g[107]
BarleyAcetone–water–acetic acid (70:29.5:0.5 v/v/v)0.80–1.30 mg/g[108]
Hulless barleyMethanol 80%0.42–5.4 mg GAE/g[109]
BarleyAcidified methanol (1:100 v/v)1.2–1.6 mg GAE/g[110]
BarleyMethanol 95%1.27 mg/g[111]
BarleyAcetone 80%1.44–1.76 mg GAE/g[112]
Table 5. Primary uses and pharmaceutical potential of barley phytochemicals.
Table 5. Primary uses and pharmaceutical potential of barley phytochemicals.
CategorySpecific Phytochemical/NutraceuticalSourcesPrimary UsesPharmaceutical PotentialReferences
Phenolic Acids Ferulic AcidBran and hull of barley grainsStrong antioxidant, protecting against cellular damage caused by free radicals.
- Shields the skin from harmful UV radiation.
- Anti-inflammatory responses.
- Contributes to the structural integrity of plant cell walls, enhancing barley’s resistance to pathogens.
May reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as heart disease and certain types of cancer by combating inflammation and oxidative stress.
- Could be used in skincare formulations to prevent UV-induced skin aging and damage.
- Potential neuroprotective effects may help in the management of neurodegenerative disorders.
- Offers the potential to improve gut health by contributing to the fiber content, which influences gut microbiota.
[113]
p-Coumaric AcidWhole grain, especially in the outer layers.Antioxidant
- Anti-inflammatory properties
- Enhances liver health by supporting the body’s natural detoxification processes.
Potential to protect against liver disorders by promoting detoxification.
- May help lower the risk of cardiovascular diseases by mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation.
- Shows promise as a chemopreventive agent, particularly in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal cancers.
- Could be incorporated into dietary supplements aimed at enhancing liver function and overall detoxification.
[114,115]
TanninsProanthocyanidins (Condensed Tannins)Hull and seed coat.Possesses strong antioxidant activity, which helps protect cells from oxidative stress.
- Exhibits astringent properties, aiding in wound healing and reducing bleeding.
- Demonstrates antimicrobial effects, which can inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria and support gut health.
- Contributes to the bitterness and astringency of barley, influencing its use in brewing and food products.
Potential applications in wound care products due to their astringent and antimicrobial properties.
- Could be developed into natural food preservatives or antimicrobial agents in food processing.
- May play a role in cancer prevention by reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.
- Useful in dietary supplements for promoting gut health and preventing infections.
[116]
FlavonoidsCatechinsAleurone layerActs as a potent antioxidant, protecting against cellular damage from free radicals.
- Supports cardiovascular health by improving blood circulation and reducing blood pressure.
- Exhibits anticancer properties by inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells and inducing apoptosis (programmed cell death).
- May improve metabolic health by enhancing insulin sensitivity and regulating blood sugar levels.
Could reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases by improving endothelial function and reducing oxidative stress.
- Potential for use in cancer prevention and treatment strategies due to their ability to inhibit tumor growth and promote cancer cell death.
- May be incorporated into dietary supplements aimed at improving metabolic health, particularly in managing diabetes and obesity.
- Could be used in functional foods to enhance overall health and prevent chronic diseases.
[117]
CarotenoidsLuteinPresent in the endosperm and aleurone layers of barley grainsPromotes eye health by filtering harmful blue light and protecting against age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
- Acts as an antioxidant, protecting cells from oxidative damage.
- Supports skin health by protecting against UV-induced damage and improving overall skin appearance.
- May contribute to cognitive health by reducing oxidative stress in the brain.
- Plays a role in the photosynthetic processes of barley, helping the plant to capture light energy efficiently.
Potential as eye health supplements aimed at preventing AMD, cataracts, and other vision-related conditions.
- Could be included in skincare products designed to protect against UV damage and promote skin health.
- May support cognitive health and reduce the risk of neurodegenerative diseases by protecting brain cells from oxidative stress.
- Potential for use in functional foods and dietary supplements targeting overall health and well-being.
[118]
ZeaxanthinOuter layersEssential for eye health, particularly in preventing AMD and cataracts.
- Acts as an antioxidant, protecting cells from oxidative damage and reducing the risk of chronic diseases.
- Supports skin health by offering protection against UV radiation and maintaining skin integrity.
- May improve overall eye function and visual performance, especially under conditions of high light exposure.
- Contributes to the pigmentation and color of barley, influencing its appearance and nutritional quality.
Useful as eye health supplements aimed at preventing and managing conditions like AMD and cataracts.
- Potential applications in skincare products for UV protection and antiaging benefits.
- May help protect cognitive health by reducing oxidative stress and maintaining healthy brain function.
- Could be incorporated into functional foods and supplements to promote overall health and protect against age-related decline.
[119,120]
Table 6. Future scope and novel uses of barley grains at a commercial scale.
Table 6. Future scope and novel uses of barley grains at a commercial scale.
Parts That Can Be UtilizedSector/Product Type
Barley husks and other agricultural byproductsBioplastics and sustainable packaging as a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based plastics
Barley cellulose and hemicelluloseBiodegradable materials preparation
Barley-based agricultural byproductsBiofuel preparation
Barley β-glucans, polyphenols, and flavonoidsHealth-benefiting pharmaceuticals and functional ingredients
Barley extractCosmetics and skincare products
Whole barley or milling fractionBarley-based enzymes, prebiotics, and beverages
Barley grainsEnergy boosting drinks
Barley strawTextile industries
Barley grainsFortified food products and feed ingredients
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaur, A.; Purewal, S.S.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Punia Bangar, S. Unraveling the Hidden Potential of Barley (Hordeum vulgare): An Important Review. Plants 2024, 13, 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172421

AMA Style

Kaur A, Purewal SS, Phimolsiripol Y, Punia Bangar S. Unraveling the Hidden Potential of Barley (Hordeum vulgare): An Important Review. Plants. 2024; 13(17):2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaur, Avneet, Sukhvinder Singh Purewal, Yuthana Phimolsiripol, and Sneh Punia Bangar. 2024. "Unraveling the Hidden Potential of Barley (Hordeum vulgare): An Important Review" Plants 13, no. 17: 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop