Next Article in Journal
Microsatellite Markers of Willow Species and Characterization of 11 Polymorphic Microsatellites for Salix eriocephala (Salicaceae), a Potential Native Species for Biomass Production in Canada
Next Article in Special Issue
Combinations of Mutations Sufficient to Alter Arabidopsis Leaf Dissection
Previous Article in Journal
Polar Expansion Dynamics in the Plant Kingdom: A Diverse and Multifunctional Journey on the Path to Pollen Tubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary and Lamina Growth

National Institute for Basic Biology, Nishigo-naka 38, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2013, 2(2), 174-202; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants2020174
Submission received: 6 February 2013 / Revised: 4 March 2013 / Accepted: 14 March 2013 / Published: 26 March 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leaf Development)

Abstract

:
In multicellular organisms, boundaries have a role in preventing the intermingling of two different cell populations and in organizing the morphogenesis of organs and the entire organism. Plant leaves have two different cell populations, the adaxial (or upper) and abaxial (or lower) cell populations, and the boundary is considered to be important for lamina growth. At the boundary between the adaxial and abaxial epidermis, corresponding to the margin, margin-specific structures are developed and structurally separate the adaxial and abaxial epidermis from each other. The adaxial and abaxial cells are determined by the adaxial and abaxial regulatory genes (including transcription factors and small RNAs), respectively. Among many lamina-growth regulators identified by recent genetic analyses, it has been revealed that the phytohormone, auxin, and the WOX family transcription factors act at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of the adaxial-abaxial pattern. Furthermore, mutant analyses of the WOX genes shed light on the role of the adaxial-abaxial boundary in preventing the mixing of the adaxial and abaxial features during lamina growth. In this review, we highlight the recent studies on the dual role of the adaxial-abaxial boundary.

1. Introduction

The “boundaries” between two different cell populations play a role as the center of many developmental events. In animal development (e.g., embryonic segmentation, vertebrate somite formation, brain development and Drosophila wing development), boundary formation is triggered by the juxtaposition of two different cell populations expressing different sets of regulatory genes at an early developmental stage, and cells located at the boundary between two different cell populations obtain special characteristics and express specific regulatory genes during boundary formation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These special characteristics and/or specific regulators contribute to both organizing morphogenesis and preventing the intermingling of the different cell populations to maintain a sharp and straight boundary, despite perturbations due to cell proliferation and tissue deformation [3,5,7,9,10,11,12,13]. Finally, the boundary cells are differentiated into specific structures that physically separate two independent structures or two different sides of a single organ.
In plant development, the boundaries and boundary-specific genes between two adjacent organs are well known to be important for organ separation (e.g., the boundaries between cotyledon-cotyledon, leaf-leaf, leaflet-leaflet, leaf-meristem, stem-stem, floral organ-floral organ and root-root, etc.) [14,15,16,17]. Additionally, the boundaries between two different sides of a single organ are considered to be important for the morphogenesis of lateral organs, which include leaves and floral organs [17,18,19,20,21]. In leaf development, the difference in gene expression level between the adaxial and abaxial sides plays an important role in cell differentiation pattern and lamina growth. The adaxial side is close to the shoot apical meristem (SAM), and the abaxial side is far from the SAM, at the early stage of primordia of lateral organs (Figure 1A). The adaxial and abaxial sides correspond to the upper and lower sides of the leaf and to the inner and outer sides of the floral organs, respectively. Lateral organs have two cell populations that have different histological features on the adaxial and abaxial sides. The adaxial and abaxial cell populations in mature organs derive from those expressing the adaxial- and abaxial-specific regulatory genes in lateral organ primordia. Because loss-of-function mutants lacking the adaxial-abaxial polarity make the organs filamentous, the adaxial-abaxial boundary is considered to be an important site for lateral organ morphogenesis, especially the lamina growth of the leaf [18,22,23].
In this review, we focus on the adaxial-abaxial boundary and lamina growth, primarily in the simple leaves of angiosperms. We introduce the following topics: (1) the structural adaxial-abaxial boundary, (2) the developmental processes of lamina growth and (3) the recent advances in understanding the regulation of lamina growth downstream of the adaxial-abaxial pattern generation. Finally, recent studies have revealed the mechanism that maintains the adaxial-abaxial pattern and the boundary during lamina growth; thus, we highlight the roles of lamina-growth regulators, especially the WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX (WOX) family genes, in preventing the mixing of adaxial and abaxial features to maintain a proper boundary.

2. Histological Aspects of the Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary of the Leaf

In mature leaves of land plants, the adaxial and abaxial cells have different features and the difference is generally optimized to their biological function (e.g., optimized photosynthesis and resistance to drought stress). The adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells have different complexities and different cuticular thicknesses. The adaxial palisade mesophyll cells are oblong in shape, densely packed and contact with each other, while the abaxial spongy mesophyll cells are uneven in shape and have air spaces between them. The distribution of trichomes is imbalanced between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces, and the number of stomata on the abaxial surface is generally greater than on the adaxial surface. In vascular bundles, xylem and phloem are differentiated on the adaxial and abaxial sides, respectively.
Figure 1. The schematic illustrations of shoots and photos of leaf tissues. (A) The schematic illustrations of shoots and a transverse section of leaf primordia. The shoot apical meristem is shown in yellow with “SAM” (shoot apical meristem); leaves are shown in green and the adaxial; middle and abaxial domains of leaf primordia are colored in orange, pink and cyan in the right column, respectively. P1, P2, P3 are the youngest, second and third leaf primordia, respectively. (BE) Scanning electron micrograph of marginal cell files of leaves of Ipomoea nil (B), Glycine max (C), Lotus japonicus (D) and Cinnamomum camphora (E). Red lines show the range of the marginal cell files. (FG) Scanning electron micrograph of Arabidopsis thaliana developing leaves. Asterisks show elongating margin cells; and an arrow shows the direction of the margin cell differentiation. (H) Transverse section of a mature leaf of A. thaliana. Palisade cells (p) and spongy cells (s) are observed in the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) sides, respectively. In the region between palisade cells and spongy cells, middle mesophyll cells having the intermediate feature (m) are observed. Vascular cells (V) are also formed at the site between the adaxial and abaxial regions. (I) Transverse section of a vascular bundle of a mature leaf of A. thaliana. Xylem (shown as orange dots) and phloem (colored in cyan) are developed in the adaxial and abaxial regions inside the vascular bundle, respectively. Procambial cells (shown in pink) are formed between xylem cells and phloem cells. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Figure 1. The schematic illustrations of shoots and photos of leaf tissues. (A) The schematic illustrations of shoots and a transverse section of leaf primordia. The shoot apical meristem is shown in yellow with “SAM” (shoot apical meristem); leaves are shown in green and the adaxial; middle and abaxial domains of leaf primordia are colored in orange, pink and cyan in the right column, respectively. P1, P2, P3 are the youngest, second and third leaf primordia, respectively. (BE) Scanning electron micrograph of marginal cell files of leaves of Ipomoea nil (B), Glycine max (C), Lotus japonicus (D) and Cinnamomum camphora (E). Red lines show the range of the marginal cell files. (FG) Scanning electron micrograph of Arabidopsis thaliana developing leaves. Asterisks show elongating margin cells; and an arrow shows the direction of the margin cell differentiation. (H) Transverse section of a mature leaf of A. thaliana. Palisade cells (p) and spongy cells (s) are observed in the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) sides, respectively. In the region between palisade cells and spongy cells, middle mesophyll cells having the intermediate feature (m) are observed. Vascular cells (V) are also formed at the site between the adaxial and abaxial regions. (I) Transverse section of a vascular bundle of a mature leaf of A. thaliana. Xylem (shown as orange dots) and phloem (colored in cyan) are developed in the adaxial and abaxial regions inside the vascular bundle, respectively. Procambial cells (shown in pink) are formed between xylem cells and phloem cells. Scale bars, 100 µm.
Plants 02 00174 g001
Two middle mesophyll layers and the margin of the leaf primordia are located in the region between the adaxial and abaxial sides (which we termed “the middle domain”), which corresponds to the adaxial-abaxial boundary, based on its position (Figure 1A). The leaf margins have several types of specific structures: margin cell files, hydathodes, margin-specific hairs and stipules. Elongated margin cells are aligned along the leaf margin to form several cell files. Elongated margin cell files have been observed in many flowering plants, including Nicotiana tabacum [24], Nicotiana sylvestris [25], Arabidopsis thaliana [26,27], Medicago truncatula [28], Ipomoea nil (Figure 1B), Glycine max (Figure 1C) and Lotus japonicus (Figure 1E). Even in Cinnamomum camphora, one of the basal angiosperms (Magnoliids) [29], although non-elongated oblong cells occupy the region neighboring the margin, the cells lie on many straight lines along the margin (Figure 1E). Elongated margin cells are localized at the adaxial-abaxial boundary of the epidermis. The differentiation precedes adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells (except for trichomes) and proceeds in a basipetal manner (Figure 1F,G) [27,30,31,32]. In addition, hydathodes are scattered at the leaf margin to create gaps of elongated margin cells [27], and stipules are formed at the lateral base of the leaf primordium in Brassicaceae. Taken together, the marginal structures create a structural boundary to separate the adaxial and abaxial cell populations from each other during explosive blade outgrowth.
In the mesophyll layers, the adaxial and abaxial cell populations are not completely separated from each other in terms of the histological aspect. In the internal layers of the middle domain, vascular bundles and mesophyll cells with an intermediate character between palisade and spongy cells are formed (Figure 1H), and the cells located in the domain do not appear to have a role as a structural boundary. In vascular bundles, procambium cells are maintained between the adaxial and abaxial regions, including xylem and phloem, respectively, and block contact between the two regions (Figure 1I). In conclusion, epidermis and vascular bundles create the structural boundaries between the adaxial and abaxial cell populations, but mesophyll does not.

3. The Regulators of the Adaxial-Abaxial Patterning of the Leaf

The difference between the adaxial and abaxial sides begins to appear at the early stage of leaf development as a distinct pattern of gene expressions. The proper adaxial-abaxial pattern is established, refined and maintained in accordance with a complicated regulatory network involving many regulators (Figure 2). The adaxial- or abaxial-specific genes, belonging to five different families of transcription factors, have been identified as the major regulators specifying the adaxial or abaxial regions: in the case of A. thaliana, three homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIPIII) family genes (PHABULOSA (PHB), PHAVOLUTA (PHV) and REVOLUTA (REV)) [33,34,35,36] and the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 (AS2) gene [37,38,39,40] have been identified as adaxial regulators and four YABBY (YAB) family genes (FILAMENTOUS FLOWER (FIL), YAB3, YAB5 and YAB2) [26,41,42], three KANADI (KAN) family genes (KAN1, KAN2 and KAN3) [43,44,45] and two AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR genes (ETTIN (ETT)/ARF3 and ARF4) [46,47] as abaxial regulators. PHANTASTICA (PHAN)/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1), which is a MYB domain transcription factor, binds to AS2 and coordinates adaxial specification together with AS2, although gene expression is detected in the broad region of young leaf primordia [37,40,48]. These regulators, except for PHAN/AS1, are specifically expressed in the adaxial or abaxial regions, and their mutual regulation contributes to the establishment and maintenance of a clear adaxial-abaxial pattern. The HD-ZIPIII genes directly or indirectly downregulate the FIL genes [42] and antagonize the KAN family genes [43,44,49,50]. KAN1 directly represses AS2 expression, and AS2 indirectly represses KAN1 expression [51]. AS2 negatively regulates ETT, KAN2 and YAB5 [37]. FIL directly upregulates KAN1 and ARF4 [52]. Furthermore, KAN1 binds to ETT in a yeast system [53], implying that KAN1 coordinates the abaxial identity together with ETT. In addition, the BTB/POZ domain-containing transcriptional coactivator, BLADE ON PETIOLE (BOP) proteins, which are expressed in the proximal, adaxial region of leaf primordia, are involved in the adaxial-abaxial patterning and directly activate AS2 expression [54]. Overexpression of BOP1 slightly increases PHB expression and slightly decreases FIL and KAN1 expression in the petiole region [55]. These regulations demonstrate that the regulators of the same side work in a coordinated manner, while those of the opposite side are antagonists.
Two types of small RNAs, the 21-nt micro RNA (miRNA), miR165/166, and the 24-nt trans-acting small interfering RNA (ta-siRNA), ta-siR ARF, are also critical for pattern formation of the adaxial and abaxial regulators [19,56]. DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1), HYPONASTIC LEAVES1 (HYL1) and SERRATE (SE) are involved in the generation and maturation of the miRNAs [57,58]. In ta-siR ARF biogenesis, transcripts from the TAS3 loci are cleaved by the function of miR390 and AGO7/ZIPPY; the cleaved TAS3 transcripts are converted to double stranded RNA (dsRNA) by SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING3 (SGS3) and RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE6 (RDR6) and the dsRNA is cleaved to a 24-nt dsRNA in a DICER-LIKE4 (DCL4)-dependent manner [57,58]. Through the function of HUA ENHANCER1 (HEN1) and ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), miR165/166 cleaves transcripts of the target genes, HD-ZIPIIIs, in the abaxial region [59,60], whereas ta-siR ARF degrades transcripts of ETT and ARF4 in the adaxial region [46,61,62,63,64,65] (Figure 2). Two of the AGO proteins contribute to the restricted distribution of the small RNAs. The AGO10/PINHEAD/ZWILLE protein is specifically expressed in the SAM and the adaxial region of lateral organs [66], binds to miR165/166 and prevents their functioning, thereby contributing to the adaxial-specific accumulation of HD-ZIPIII transcripts [67] (Figure 2). AGO10 expression is upregulated by REV, one of the HD-ZIPIII genes [68] (Figure 2). The expression of AGO7 is restricted to the adaxial region to limit the distribution of ta-siR ARF [46] (Figure 2).
In addition to small RNAs, small proteins containing a leucine zipper domain similar to HD-ZIPIII (ZPR) modulate the negative feedback regulation of HD-ZIPIII: the HD-ZIPIII protein REV activates ZPR transcription, and the ZPR proteins bind to the leucine zipper domain of HD-ZIPIII to decrease the activity of HD-ZIPIII [69]. Furthermore, the roles of several housekeeping genes, including ribosomal proteins (RPL4D, PGY3/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 1/2 ENHANCER6 (AE6)/RPL5A, RPL5B, PGY2/RPL9C, PIGGYBACK1 (PGY1)/RPL10aB, RPL24B, RPL27aC, AE5/RPL28A (AE5), RPS6A and RPS21B), histone deacetylases, the proteasome pathway, plastid-related genes and elongator complexes, have also been reported in adaxial-abaxial patterning [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]. The overaccumulation and exogenous application of succinic semialdehyde (SSA), a metabolite in the GABA shunt, disturbs the adaxial-abaxial polarity, suggesting that the balance between the adaxial and abaxial regulators at the early stage of leaf primordia is affected by the amount of the metabolite SSA [79]. The regulatory network for the establishment and maintenance of the adaxial-abaxial pattern is not yet well understood, because the network consists of a number of factors, including transcription factors, small RNAs, the AGO proteins, small proteins, housekeeping genes and SSA, and the interactions among the factors are complicated. Work using a systems biology approach in the sepal primordium has been reported [80], and the entire picture of the network will be elucidated in the near future.
Figure 2. Reported interactions among the adaxial and abaxial regulators. The adaxial-specific regulators are shown in orange characters. The abaxial-specific regulators are shown in blue characters. PHAN/AS1 shown in black character is expressed broadly in leaf primordia. Red arrows show positive regulations, cyan wedges show negative regulations and black bars show direct interaction between two regulatory proteins.
Figure 2. Reported interactions among the adaxial and abaxial regulators. The adaxial-specific regulators are shown in orange characters. The abaxial-specific regulators are shown in blue characters. PHAN/AS1 shown in black character is expressed broadly in leaf primordia. Red arrows show positive regulations, cyan wedges show negative regulations and black bars show direct interaction between two regulatory proteins.
Plants 02 00174 g002

4. Lamina Growth and Its Regulators

Leaf morphogenesis is accomplished through four processes: founder-cell recruitment from the peripheral zone of the SAM (Step 1), distal growth (Step 2), blade initiation at the site neighboring the margin (Step 3) and intercalary growth throughout the blade region (Step 4) [24,81,82,83,84]. Figure 3 shows the schematic perspective view of leaf morphogenesis (Figure 3A) and illustrations of each step (Figure 3B–E).
The initiation of lateral organs, including the leaves, arises at a site in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the SAM (Figure 3A,B) and is triggered by the accumulation of phytohormone auxin [85] and the alteration of cell-wall behavior [86,87,88,89]. In the area neighboring the auxin maxima in the PZ, a group of founder cells obtain a fate as organ primordia. The number of founder cells was calculated to be 20–30 cells in a leaf of A. thaliana [90,91], 100–150 cells in the tobacco leaf (Poethig and Sussex, 1985a; Steeves and Sussex, 1989) and approx. 250 cells in Zea mays leaves [81,82] based on clonal analyses. The eudicot leaf primordium, including A. thaliana and N. tabacum, is initiated as a peg-like outgrowth, whereas the monocot leaf primordium, including Z. mays, is initiated as a ring-shaped outgrowth surrounding the SAM [81]. Primordial initiation of a simple leaf accompanies a cessation of the expression of the meristem-specific genes, i.e., the KNOTTED-LIKE HOMEOBOX (KNOX) family genes [92,93,94,95,96,97,98]. Repression of KNOX expression in leaf primordia is triggered and/or maintained by leaf primordium-specific factors (e.g., auxin, AS1, AS2, FIL/YAB and BOP) [55,94,99,100,101,102,103]. The distribution of auxin is also known to be a crucial factor for determining the range of founder-cell recruitment in both eudicot and monocot species [85,104]. In the case of Z. mays leaves, the functioning of the NARROW SHEATH (NS) genes, which encode plant-specific homeobox transcription factors that belong to the WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX (WOX) family, is also required for normal recruitment of leaf founder cells from the lateral region and for repression of KNOX expression [105,106,107]. In A. thaliana, overexpression of WOX1, one of the WOX family genes related to NS (but not its orthologous gene), is also reported to induce a defect in the SAM [108].
Subsequently, the initiated primordium grows in the distal direction (Figure 3C). In the case of the sepal primordium in A. thaliana, the anisotropic distal growth is an important factor for the transition of the fate from the meristem to the primordium, as well as accelerated cell division, cell enlargement and an increase in cell-size heterogeneity [109]. The fate transition, regulated by the JAGGED (JAG) transcription factor, is not essential for organ initiation, but is important for the primary growth of organs [109]. During leaf development, the JAG gene is expressed [110,111]. and the NUBBIN gene, a gene homologous to JAG, acts redundantly with JAG in leaf development [112]. Hence, the fate transition regulated by JAG may also be important for the beginning of distal growth during leaf development. In eudicot leaves, lamina growth begins a little later than distal growth [81] (Figure 3A,D). In early primordia, a high frequency of cell division is detected at the region neighboring the margin [83,113,114]. and the periclinal division of the third layer from the surface is specifically found in the region neighboring the margin [115], corresponding to the onset of the blade outgrowth. Clonal analyses, showing the fan-shaped sectors in eudicot leaves [81,82,90,91], and the difference between the distal and basal cells in cell shape and alignment in early leaf primordia [116] support a model in which the blade region in mature leaves corresponds to the part neighboring the margin in early leaf primordia (the green area in Figure 3D). The junction between the blade region and the petiole region (the B/P junction) is the site expressing the CYCLIN D4;2 gene, presumably involved in the cell cycle, and can act as a source of both blade and petiole cells [116]. The formation of the B/P junction requires the function of the BOP genes [116], which are specifically expressed in the petiole region and reduce the expression level of the meristem-specific KNOX genes [101] and of the lamina-specific JAG gene [117]. The formation of the B/P junction might be a key step for determining the blade area at the blade-initiation stage. For the blade initiation of eudicot leaves, the WOX family genes, including the A. thaliana PRESSED FLOWER (PRS) gene, which are orthologous to the Z. mays NS genes and the WOX1 genes (N. sylvestris LAMINA1 (LAM1), A. thaliana WOX1, Petunia hybrida MAEWEST (MAW), M. truncatula STENOFOLIA (STF) and Pisum sativum LATHYROIDES genes), are reported to play a key role [25,28,113,115,118,119]. The lam1 mutant of N. sylvestris has leaves that lack the blade region, and the prs wox1 double mutant of A. thaliana, the maw mutant of P. hybrida and the stf mutant of M. truncatula have narrow leaves. In prs wox1, the frequency of cell division at the marginal region of early leaf primordia decreases to the same level as at the central region [113]. The accumulation of PRS and LAM1/WOX1 transcripts can be detected at the margin of early primordia [28,113,119,120]. Thus, it is suggested that PRS and LAM1/WOX1 increase the rate of cell division and stimulate the periclinal division in the region neighboring the margin to contribute to blade initiation.
Figure 3. Schematic views of leaf development. (A) The overview of dicot leaf development. Leaf primordia are illustrated in the top view and the front view, and black lines show the borderlines between the individual sectors sharing a common origin in the incipient primordium. Light pink shows the region of indeterminate margin cells, and magenta shows the region of differentiated margin cells. Dashed lines show the B/P junction. (BE) Schematic views of four steps during leaf development. First, the initiation of leaf primordia (indicated as “Lp”) starts through the recruitment of the founder cells from the peripheral zone of the SAM, (B) and then, the initiated leaf primordium grows predominantly in the distal direction (C). Subsequently, the blade region (indicated as “B”) the petiole region (indicated as “P”) are specified on the basis of the distance from the margin, (D) and finally, the leaf blade expands towards both the distal and lateral directions (E). Red arrows in (BE) show the direction of leaf growth.
Figure 3. Schematic views of leaf development. (A) The overview of dicot leaf development. Leaf primordia are illustrated in the top view and the front view, and black lines show the borderlines between the individual sectors sharing a common origin in the incipient primordium. Light pink shows the region of indeterminate margin cells, and magenta shows the region of differentiated margin cells. Dashed lines show the B/P junction. (BE) Schematic views of four steps during leaf development. First, the initiation of leaf primordia (indicated as “Lp”) starts through the recruitment of the founder cells from the peripheral zone of the SAM, (B) and then, the initiated leaf primordium grows predominantly in the distal direction (C). Subsequently, the blade region (indicated as “B”) the petiole region (indicated as “P”) are specified on the basis of the distance from the margin, (D) and finally, the leaf blade expands towards both the distal and lateral directions (E). Red arrows in (BE) show the direction of leaf growth.
Plants 02 00174 g003
After blade initiation, the expansion by both cell division and cell differentiation occurs in the entire blade region, called “intercalary growth” (Figure 3E). The transition from the cell-division stage to the cell-differentiation stage proceeds in a basipetal manner [82,83,121], and the forefront of the transition is named the “arrest front” [121]. The fan-shaped sectors in clonal analyses [81,82,90,91] indicate that the medial and lateral parts of the leaf primordia correspond to the distal and proximal parts of the leaf blade in mature leaves, respectively (Figure 3A). Namely, the basipetal transition from the cell-division stage to the cell-differentiation stage in the leaf blade of developing leaves can be interpreted as the medial-to-lateral transition in early leaf primordia. The analysis of growth dynamics by time-lapse imaging supports the deformation of the growth axis during blade expansion [122]. Recent studies have identified many regulators affecting the rate or duration of cell division during intercalary growth. The rate of cell division is positively regulated by FUGU2, FUGU5 and ERECTA [123] and negatively regulated by SPATULA and ROTUNDIFOLIA4 [124,125,126]. In contrast, the duration of cell proliferation is prolonged by AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) [127], AUXIN-REGULATED GENE INVOLVED IN ORGAN SIZE (ARGOS) [128] and its related genes (ARGOS-LIKE (ARL) or GAN SIZE RELATED1 (OSR1)) [129], the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR (GRF) family genes [130], the ANGUSTIFOLIA3 (AN3)/GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR (GIF) family genes [130,131,132], the microRNA miR319 [133,134], the KLUH (KLU)/CYP78A5 gene [135] and the STRUWWELPETER/MED14 gene [136], whereas the duration of cell proliferation is shortened by the microRNA miR396, which targets some of the GRF family genes [137], the PEAPOD1 (PPD1) and the PPD2 genes [138], the TCP family genes targeted by microRNA miR319 [121,133], the DA1 gene and its related genes (DAR) [139] and the MED25/PFT1 gene, which encodes the mediator complex subunit 25 [140]. Of these genes, AN3 and KLU can affect cell behavior in a non-cell autonomous manner [135,141,142], and the non-cell autonomous effect may be important for orchestration among the blade cells adjacent to each other during intercalary growth. The WOX1 orthologous genes also act in this step, because these genes are expressed in the middle mesophyll layers between the adaxial and abaxial sides throughout the leaf blade [28,113,119] and upregulate the KLU expression at the leaf margin [113]. In addition, phytohormones are also important for lamina expansion. Auxin is one of the most important regulators of blade expansion out of phytohormones. Auxin accumulation is required for the outgrowth of the tip of the margin serrations [100,143]. The quadruple mutant of YUCCA (YUC) family genes, which are auxin biosynthetic genes [144,145,146], i.e., the yuc1 yuc2 yuc4 yuc6 quadruple mutant, forms very narrow leaves [147]. Furthermore, treatment with exogenous auxin stimulates the expression of ARGOS, which induces ANT expression and may contribute to lamina growth [148], consistent with the model in which blade expansion is positively regulated by auxin. It has also been reported that treatment with exogenous auxin prevents blade expansion [149], most likely through inhibition of cell expansion [150], implying that the proper amount and distribution of auxin are important for promoting blade expansion. In addition to auxin, brassinosteroid, another phytohormone, is reported to be important for both cell proliferation and cell expansion during lamina growth [151,152,153,154,155].
The recruitment of founder cells (Step 1) appears to be crucial for the lamina growth of monocots, although blade initiation (Step 3) and intercalary growth (Step 4) are the most important steps for lamina growth in eudicot species. In the clonal analysis of Z. mays leaves, clonal sectors are more thread-like than fan-like in shape [81]. Additionally, mutations of the NS genes resulted in the failure to recruit founder cells of the lateral region to form narrower blades and sheaths of mature leaves [105,106]. It is also reported that the double mutant of Oryza sativa NARROW LEAF2 (NAL2) and NAL3 orthologous to Z. mays NS genes shows the defects of the leaf lateral region, similar to Z. mays ns mutant [156].

5. The Regulation of Lamina Growth and Margin Formation at the Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary

As we described above, adaxial-abaxial polarity is required for lateral organ morphogenesis, especially lamina growth and margin formation of the leaf. In surgical experiments, an incipient leaf primordium that was physically separated from the shoot apical meristem (SAM) became a filament-like structure lacking adaxial-abaxial polarity, indicating that both the establishment of adaxial-abaxial differentiation and the onset of the blade initiation require connection with the SAM in Solanum tuberosum L. and S. lycopersicum [81,157]. Additionally, Waites and Hudson reported an Antirrhinum majus phan mutant in which the adaxial cell fate was weakened or missing [23]. In the phan mutant, two opposite phenotypes were observed in terms of lamina growth: (1) no or decreased growth of the leaf blade and (2) adventitious outgrowths at the ectopic boundary of the adaxial- and abaxial-like compartments on the adaxial surface [23]. Similar defects were also found in several mutants in Z. mays [22,158,159], A. thaliana [33,39,42,43,44,45,47,79,160], N. sylvestris [161] and I. nil [162], as well as in A. majus [114]. In eudicots, even plants lacking adaxial-abaxial polarity display leaf initiation from the SAM (Step 1) and distal growth of leaf primordia (Step 2). Therefore, it is hypothesized that the juxtaposition of the adaxial and abaxial cell populations is required for proper lamina growth, consisting of lamina initiation (Step 3) and intercalary growth (Step 4), at the adaxial-abaxial boundary [18,21,163]. In addition to lamina growth, it has been suggested that development of margin-specific structures is affected by the malfunction of the adaxial-abaxial polarity. In adaxial- or abaxial-deficient mutants, a filamentous or narrow leaf phenotype is accompanied by the deletion of margin-specific structures, whereas adaxial or abaxial protrusions have margin-like structures, i.e., elongated cells, hydathode-like structures and stipules [32,41,42,43,44,160]. As described above, margin-specific structures are formed at the adaxial-abaxial boundary of the epidermis. In conclusion, it has been suggested that both lamina growth and margin formation are stimulated by the juxtaposition of the adaxial and abaxial cell populations.
Of the adaxial and abaxial factors, the YAB family genes, especially A. thaliana FIL/YAB1 and YAB3 and A. majus GRAMINIFOLIA (GRAM), act in lamina growth and margin formation in addition to adaxial-abaxial patterning [41,42,44,114]. The YAB family genes show specific expression in the abaxial region of lateral organ primordia during lamina growth in eudicots [26,41,42,44,164], whereas the expression of the YAB genes is detected in the broad region at the leaf-initiation stage [164,165]. Furthermore, the expression of YAB family genes is restricted into the middle mesophyll layers and the leaf margin in monocot Z. mays and O. sativa leaves, rather than the abaxial region [166,167]. The expression of the YAB genes is correlated with lamina growth in both A. thaliana and S. tuberosum [44]. The YAB family genes are ectopically expressed at the abaxial protrusions of the kan1 kan2 leaves [44]. The mutation of FIL and/or YAB3 suppresses formation of the abaxial protrusions of kan1 kan2 leaves [44] and of ectopic lamina growth of bop1 bop2 leaf petioles [102]. These findings suggest that the YAB genes play a role in lamina growth. However, overexpression of the YAB genes prevents blade outgrowth, perturbs margin formation and results in the arrest of the SAM [26,42]. In addition, the YAB genes need to downregulate the expression of the meristem-specific genes, including KNOX and WUSCHEL (WUS) [42,168], and upregulate the expression of the TCP family genes to act as a negative regulator of intercalary growth of the leaf lamina [41]. Furthermore, the YAB genes are required not only for abaxial features, but also for adaxial features and adaxial PHB expression [169,170]. Thus, it can be concluded that the YAB family genes not only promote lamina growth, but also cause the foliar characteristics of the leaf primordium.
Of the lamina-growth regulators, recent studies based on A. thaliana reveal the two candidates that mediate lamina growth and margin formation at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of adaxial-abaxial patterning. The first candidate is the phytohormone, auxin. Based on the expression of the auxin-response reporter DR5 markers, auxin is accumulated at the leaf tip, hydathodes and stipules and in the preprocambial cells in leaf primordia [171,172,173]. The DR5 marker pattern and the polar localization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN1 protein indicate that auxin (1) flows along the leaf margin to form several auxin maxima, (2) floods into the inner mesophyll layers from the auxin maxima and (3) reaches the midrib [171,173,174]. In this manner, the trajectory of auxin in leaf primordia is restricted to the middle domain. The number and the position of auxin maxima affects lamina growth, as well as the number and the position of the hydathodes or the margin gaps, and formation of auxin maxima is regulated by the function of the adaxial-specific AS2 gene and its coregulator, PHAN/AS1 [27]. In addition, the auxin biosynthetic YUC family genes (YUC1, YUC2 and YUC4) are expressed in the early leaf primordia, including the region neighboring a hydathode at the margin and/or the middle mesophyll, and expression is dependent on the adaxial-abaxial pattern [32]. The expression of these YUC genes is ectopically detected at the adventitious protrusions on the adaxial or abaxial surface of leaves in the abaxial-deficient kan1 kan2 mutant and the adaxial-deficient as2 rev mutants [32]. Mutations of the YUC genes and inhibition of polar auxin transport by NPA treatment suppress the adventitious protrusions in both kan1 kan2 and as2 rev mutant backgrounds [32]. According to these findings, it is suggested that the amount and distribution of auxin mediate blade outgrowth at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of the adaxial-abaxial pattern. The adaxial-specific REV gene and the abaxial-specific KAN1 gene positively and negatively regulate auxin biosynthetic genes (i.e., TAA1 and YUC5), respectively [175]. These data are evidence of the direct regulation of the auxin level by the adaxial and abaxial regulators.
The second candidate genes are the WOX family genes, including PRS and WOX1. PRS and WOX1 in A. thaliana and the WOX1 orthologous gene, STF, in M. truncatula are required for both lamina growth and marginal cell fate [28,113]. PRS and WOX1 in A. thaliana are specifically expressed in the middle domain [113,119,120,176], and similar expression patterns of the WOX1 orthologous genes in P. hybrida, M. truncatula and P. sativum are observed in developing leaves [28,118,119]. The expression domain of PRS and WOX1 does not overlap with and is located between the expression domains of the adaxial- and abaxial-specific regulators, except for FIL [113]. The expression of PRS and WOX1 is detected in the broad region of the abaxial side in the kan1 kan2 double mutant, which expresses abaxial protrusions [113]. The expressions of PRS and WOX1 are indirectly and directly repressed by KAN1, respectively [113]. WOX1 expression was decreased in the fil yab3 double mutant, which has narrow leaves [113], and in the prs wox1 as2 triple mutant, in which leaves are completely abaxialized [176]. Furthermore, ectopic expression of WOX1 in the abaxial region induces adventitious outgrowth with margin-like structures on the abaxial surface of the leaf similar to kan1 kan2 [113]. These findings strongly suggest that PRS and WOX1 play key roles in lamina growth and margin formation at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of the adaxial and abaxial regulators.
With respect to the relationship between auxin and WOX1, Tadege et al. proposed that WOX1/LAM1/STF affects the amount of auxin [28]. In a transcriptome analysis of an M. truncatula stf mutant, the alteration of the expression level of the auxin-related genes is overrepresented. In an M. truncatula stf mutant and an N. sylvestris lam1 mutant, the amount of auxin is reduced compared to wild-type, whereas the overexpression of STF causes the overaccumulation of auxin. Although how WOX1/LAM1/STF affects the amount of auxin is unknown, mutation alters the accumulation pattern of metabolites in the IAA biosynthetic pathway and the metabolic pathway upstream of Trp, including sugar metabolism. The bladeless phenotype of the N. sylvestris lam1 mutant is partly rescued by application of both auxin and cytokinin, suggesting that auxin and cytokinin are downstream factors of the WOX1/LAM1 gene for lamina growth. Thus, WOX1/LAM1 might facilitate the accumulation and/or the function of both auxin and cytokinin to promote lamina growth. In fact, the homologous genes that are closely related to WOX1/LAM1 are reported to be involved in the accumulation and signaling of cytokinin; the A. thaliana WUS gene positively regulates cytokinin signaling through downregulation of the type-A ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR genes [177], and the O. sativa WOX4 gene increases the amount of cytokinin [178]. In addition to the relationship between auxin and the WOX genes, it has been shown that FIL expression overlaps the WOX genes in the middle domain and that FIL and/or YAB3 are required for the upregulation of the WOX1 expression [113]. Based on these findings, the model shown in Figure 4 can be proposed: (1) the expression of the auxin biosynthetic genes and of the WOX genes is induced at the adaxial-abaxial boundary in accordance with the adaxial-abaxial pattern, (2) the FIL/YAB genes upregulate WOX1 expression and WOX reinforces accumulation of auxin via several metabolic pathways and (3) FIL/YAB, WOX and auxin (and most likely also cytokinin) coordinate lamina growth (i.e., blade initiation and intercalary growth) and margin formation.
Figure 4. The model of the regulation of lamina growth and margin formation. The lamina-growth regulators, including YAB, WOX1 and auxin, act in lamina growth and margin formation at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of the adaxial-abaxial pattern (Ad-ab pattern).
Figure 4. The model of the regulation of lamina growth and margin formation. The lamina-growth regulators, including YAB, WOX1 and auxin, act in lamina growth and margin formation at the adaxial-abaxial boundary downstream of the adaxial-abaxial pattern (Ad-ab pattern).
Plants 02 00174 g004

6. Maintenance of the Adaxial-Abaxial Pattern during Lamina Growth

Studies of the WOX family genes (PRS and WOX1/LAM1/MAW) in N. sylvestris, P. hybrida and A. thaliana shed light on a new role of the adaxial-abaxial boundary during adaxial-abaxial patterning [25,113,119,176]. In N. sylvestris lam1 leaves, the marginal elongated cell files are missing from the marginal region and transform into cells having neither adaxial nor abaxial feature [25]. The margin loss and a polarity defect in the marginal region are also observed in P. hybrida and A. thaliana: the region neighboring the margin exhibits an abaxialized phenotype in a P. hybrida maw mutant [119], and the region consists of both adaxial-like cells and abaxial-like cells (i.e., abaxial-type epidermal cells, trichomes, palisade-like cells and spongy-like cells) in the A. thaliana prs wox1 double mutant [113]. Based on periclinal chimera analysis in N. sylvestris, the chimeric plant having the lam1 defect in both the L1 and L2 layers (the L1-L2 lam1 chimera) exhibits both margin loss and an adaxial-abaxial polarity defect in the region neighboring the margin, despite normal outgrowth of the blade [25]. These findings suggest that the LAM1/WOX1 function in the L1 and L2 layers is important for genes that play a role in adaxial-abaxial patterning, whereas the LAM1/WOX1 function in the L3 layer is sufficient for blade outgrowth. In the L1-only lam1 chimera, the margin cells and adaxial-abaxial polarity are almost normal [25], implying that the L2 layer is sufficient for LAM1/WOX1 function in the adaxial-abaxial patterning and margin formation. Based on genetic analyses, mutations of PRS and WOX1 can enhance both adaxialization and abaxialization in the abaxial-deficient mutants (kan1 kan2 and fil yab3) and adaxial-deficient mutants (as2 and rev), respectively [113,176]. Taken together, it can be concluded that the WOX genes act in suppression of both adaxial- and abaxial-specific features from the L2 layer of the adaxial-abaxial boundary. Based on RNA in situ hybridization analysis, the expression patterns of AS2 and FIL in the prs wox1 primordia are similar to those in the wild-type primordia before blade initiation, whereas at the later stage, both expression domains expand toward the opposite side and overlap each other in the marginal region [113]. The WOX genes function in the downregulation of not only AS2 and FIL, but also ARF4 and miR165A [119,176]. The PRS and WOX1/STF proteins act as transcriptional repressors [179,180], and the WOX protein and other homologous proteins exhibit repressive activity that is interchangeable [180,181]. In conclusion, WOX function in the L2 layer of the adaxial-abaxial boundary represses several adaxial- and abaxial-specific regulators to maintain separation of the adaxial and abaxial features.
In the previous study, it was found that the adaxial- and abaxial-specific regulators, except for FIL, are expressed in one or two outer layer(s) in A. thaliana [37,46,113,182]. In particular, AS2, ta-siR ARF and miR165/166 are generated in the outermost layer of the adaxial or abaxial sides [37,46,182]. The regions where the small RNAs degrade their target genes are broader in leaf primordia [46,79], and the small RNAs also function in roots and/or embryogenesis in a non-cell-autonomous manner [183,184,185,186], suggesting that these small RNAs act as mobile signals. In addition, in prs wox1 leaf primordia, the expansion of the transcriptional region of miR165A in the epidermal layer coincides with restriction of the YFP-positive region of the miYFP-W marker targeted by miR165/166 in both the outer and inner layers neighboring the margin [113,176]. Thus, it is possible that the adaxial-abaxial pattern of the epidermal layer may guide that of the inner layers. Taken together, we propose a hypothesis for the mechanism maintaining the adaxial-abaxial pattern and the adaxial-abaxial boundary during lamina growth. First, an initiated leaf primordium obtains adaxial-abaxial polarity based on the presumptive positional signal(s) from the SAM. Second, based on the adaxial-abaxial polarity, the adaxial and abaxial regions and the adaxial-abaxial boundary are determined. Then, the WOX family genes, PRS and the WOX1 orthologous genes are expressed at the adaxial-abaxial boundary (or the middle domain). Fourth, the WOX genes repress the expression of several adaxial- and abaxial-specific regulators in the outer layers of the adaxial-abaxial boundary, corresponding to the leaf margin and prevent expansion of adaxial and abaxial domains (Figure 5). The WOX genes induce blade initiation and promote lamina expansion in the internal layers of the adaxial-abaxial boundary. Fifth, the adaxial-abaxial pattern of the inner layers is maintained according to the distribution of small RNAs from the outer layer during lamina growth (Figure 5). Finally, the WOX genes induce the differentiation of the margin-specific structures to form a structural boundary. Because the defects of the adaxial-abaxial pattern and of margin formation are also observed in the epidermal layer of N. sylvestris lam1, A. thaliana prs wox1 and M. truncatula stf [25,28,113], the sufficiency of LAM1/WOX1 function in the L2 layer [25] suggests that WOX1 orthologous genes can affect neighbor cells during these two processes. Cell-to-cell movement of the WUS protein, one of the homologues closely related to WOX1, has been reported [187]. Therefore, the WOX1 protein might move between the L1 and L2 layers. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that adaxial epidermal cells are completely separated from abaxial cells by margin-specific cells, and the separation of the adaxial and abaxial mesophyll cells is obscure.
Of the lamina-growth regulators, ANT and AN3 are also responsible for the adaxial-abaxial patterning. Mutations in ANT and AN3 enhance the defects of the adaxial-abaxial pattern in fil yab3 and as2, respectively [169,188]. Genetic analysis suggested that the ANT and YAB genes coordinately act as positive regulators of both genes, specifying adaxial or abaxial fates [169]. Recently, it has been proposed that ANT modulates auxin homeostasis through the regulation of the auxin biosynthetic TAA1 expression with REV in gynoecium development [189]. Thus, ANT might play a role in the reinforcement of the adaxial-abaxial pattern and auxin induction at the adaxial-abaxial boundary in coordination with the adaxial and abaxial regulators. The an3 as2 double mutant (and also the an3 as1 double mutant) exhibit a more severe defect in the leaf adaxial-abaxial pattern, in that these mutants frequently develop trumpet-like leaves and an increased level of ETT and YAB5 [188]. AN3 expression is detected in all layers of the mesophyll and is not dependent on the function of AS1 and AS2 [188]. Furthermore, AN3 is required for the upregulation of the histone deacetylase genes and a ribosomal protein gene, RPS27aA [188]. Thus, the histone deacetylase genes and the ribosomal protein gene may be able to continue to express, because of AN3 function during intercalary growth to maintain the adaxial-abaxial pattern (and likely also the adaxial-abaxial boundary). Clarifying the mechanism in which the adaxial-abaxial pattern and boundary are maintained by the lamina-growth regulators during lamina growth is an intriguing problem that should be addressed in the future.
Figure 5. The model of the maintenance of the adaxial-abaxial pattern during lamina growth. A schematic view of the transverse section of leaf primordia during lamina growth. The adaxial and abaxial regulators, including mobile signaling factors, are expressed in the adaxial and abaxial cells of the outer layer (colored in orange and cyan), respectively and contribute to the maintenance of the identity of the inner layers in a non-cell-autonomous manner (black arrows). The effect of the mobile signaling factors reaches the margin cells, but the middle domain-specific WOX genes inhibit the expression of the adaxial and abaxial regulators, resulting in preventing the mixing of the adaxial and abaxial features and maintaining the adaxial-abaxial pattern (shown in a right balloon).
Figure 5. The model of the maintenance of the adaxial-abaxial pattern during lamina growth. A schematic view of the transverse section of leaf primordia during lamina growth. The adaxial and abaxial regulators, including mobile signaling factors, are expressed in the adaxial and abaxial cells of the outer layer (colored in orange and cyan), respectively and contribute to the maintenance of the identity of the inner layers in a non-cell-autonomous manner (black arrows). The effect of the mobile signaling factors reaches the margin cells, but the middle domain-specific WOX genes inhibit the expression of the adaxial and abaxial regulators, resulting in preventing the mixing of the adaxial and abaxial features and maintaining the adaxial-abaxial pattern (shown in a right balloon).
Plants 02 00174 g005

7. Conclusion and Future Perspectives

In this review, we highlight recent reports that have shown that the leaf adaxial-abaxial boundary is important for both lamina growth and maintenance of the adaxial-abaxial pattern. Among lamina-growth regulators, auxin and the WOX genes act at the adaxial-abaxial boundary and are dependent upon the adaxial-abaxial pattern. The function of the WOX genes at the adaxial-abaxial boundary is required for preventing the mixing of adaxial and abaxial-specific features. Based on previous studies on adaxial-abaxial patterning and the WOX genes, we proposed that the adaxial-abaxial pattern of the outer layer affects that of the inner layers and that the WOX genes at the leaf margin are important for the maintenance of the adaxial-abaxial pattern of the outer layer.
In animal development, boundaries help prevent the intermingling of two different cell populations [3]. The integrity of the boundaries is primarily challenged by cell division and/or tissue deformation during embryogenesis or organ growth and is maintained via two different mechanisms (the lineage-based boundary and non-lineage boundary). In both boundaries, the fates of cells remain during organogenesis. When the boundaries receive pressure to deform, straight and smooth boundaries are maintained by their own features, for example, due to increased cell bond tension and decreased cell division rate, in the case of the lineage-based boundary, and due to switching of cell fates based on the positional signal(s), in the case of the non-lineage boundary [3,10,11,12,13]. In contrast, the leaf adaxial-abaxial boundary plays a role in preventing the intermingling of the adaxial and abaxial “features” or “gene expressions”, rather than cell populations. This fact indicates that gene expression patterns dynamics are a major cause of perturbation of the sharp and smooth boundary. The small RNAs, i.e., miR165/166 and ta-siR ARF, are considered to act as potentially mobile signals in leaf primordia and mediate the antagonistic interactions between the adaxial and abaxial regions [19,56]. A mathematical model from our group demonstrates that the antagonistic interaction between two diffusible signaling molecules induces the dynamic pattern of the boundary [165], supporting our concept that the integrity of the boundary is challenged by gene expression dynamics. In fact, the boundary shift is observed in the inner layers during leaf development [165], whereas the position of the boundary appears relatively-stable at the margin during lamina growth. Hence, repression of both the adaxial- and abaxial-specific gene expression by WOX genes at the margin would establish a buffer region between the adaxial and abaxial regions to prevent mixing of the adaxial- and abaxial-specific gene expression and features (Figure 5).
In nature, a huge variety in the shape of leaves and flowers is observed, and the molecular basis of the diversity is an intriguing problems. In plant development, the shape of organs is determined by the direction and extent of cell proliferation and cell expansion. The adaxial-abaxial boundary organizes the pattern of cell proliferation in leaf and floral organ primordia and is one of the major causes that determine the shape of lateral organs. Therefore, understanding how the adaxial-abaxial pattern is changed and arranged during the evolution of each plant species is required for understanding the diversity of leaf and flower shapes. Recent reports have demonstrated the alteration of the adaxial-abaxial pattern or WOX expression results in the development of lateral organs that are atypical in shape in several species: for example, PRSb/WOX3 expression in the de novo margin of a unifacial leaf of Juncus prismatocarpus [190], expansion of the expression domain of the FIL orthologous gene in a peltate leaf of Tropaeolum majus [191] and the dynamic patterns of ETT1 and PHB3 in anthers of O. sativa [192]. In conclusion, the analyses of the adaxial-abaxial pattern and boundary in both model and non-model plant species is expected to shed light on the molecular basis of the diversity of leaves and flowers.

Acknowledgments

We thank Toshiaki Tameshige (National Institute for Basic Biology [NIBB]) and Kensuke Kawade (RIKEN) for fruitful discussion, Hiro-Yuki Hirano (University of Tokyo) for providing information and Kiyoshi Tatematsu (NIBB) and Gorou Horiguchi (Rikkyo University) for reading the manuscript and helpful comments. We thank Atsushi Hoshino (NIBB), Satoru Okamoto (NIBB), Emiko Yoro (NIBB) and Masahiro Takahara (NIBB) for providing leaves of I. nil, G. max and L. japonicus. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry for Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (No. 19060004) and a Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 19GS0315) to K. Okada and by a JSPS Fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 20-2203) to M. Nakata.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  1. Blair, S.S. Developmental biology: Boundary lines. Nature 2003, 424, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dahmann, C.; Basler, K. Compartment boundaries: At the edge of development. Trends Genet. 1999, 15, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dahmann, C.; Oates, A.C.; Brand, M. Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Irvine, K.D. Fringe, Notch, and making developmental boundaries. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999, 9, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Irvine, K.D.; Rauskolb, C. Boundaries in development: Formation and function. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kicheva, A.; Pantazis, P.; Bollenbach, T.; Kalaidzidis, Y.; Bittig, T.; Julicher, F.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Kinetics of morphogen gradient formation. Science 2007, 315, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Klein, T. Wing disc development in the fly: The early stages. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wartlick, O.; Mumcu, P.; Kicheva, A.; Bittig, T.; Seum, C.; Julicher, F.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Dynamics of Dpp signaling and proliferation control. Science 2011, 331, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kato, K.; Orii, H.; Watanabe, K.; Agata, K. Dorsal and ventral positional cues required for the onset of planarian regeneration may reside in differentiated cells. Dev. Biol. 2001, 233, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Major, R.J.; Irvine, K.D. Localization and requirement for Myosin II at the dorsal-ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 3051–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Landsberg, K.P.; Farhadifar, R.; Ranft, J.; Umetsu, D.; Widmann, T.J.; Bittig, T.; Said, A.; Julicher, F.; Dahmann, C. Increased cell bond tension governs cell sorting at the Drosophila anteroposterior compartment boundary. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1950–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Canela-Xandri, O.; Sagues, F.; Casademunt, J.; Buceta, J. Dynamics and mechanical stability of the developing dorsoventral organizer of the wing imaginal disc. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, e1002153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aliee, M.; Roper, J.C.; Landsberg, K.P.; Pentzold, C.; Widmann, T.J.; Julicher, F.; Dahmann, C. Physical mechanisms shaping the Drosophila dorsoventral compartment boundary. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aida, M.; Tasaka, M. Genetic control of shoot organ boundaries. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blein, T.; Hasson, A.; Laufs, P. Leaf development: What it needs to be complex. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rast, M.I.; Simon, R. The meristem-to-organ boundary: More than an extremity of anything. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Townsley, B.T.; Sinha, N.R. A new development: Evolving concepts in leaf ontogeny. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 535–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bowman, J.L.; Eshed, Y.; Baum, S.F. Establishment of polarity in angiosperm lateral organs. Trends Genet. 2002, 18, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chitwood, D.H.; Guo, M.; Nogueira, F.T.S.; Timmermans, M.C.P. Establishing leaf polarity: The role of small RNAs and positional signals in the shoot apex. Development 2007, 134, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Husbands, A.Y.; Chitwood, D.H.; Plavskin, Y.; Timmermans, M.C. Signals and prepatterns: New insights into organ polarity in plants. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 1986–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yamaguchi, T.; Nukazuka, A.; Tsukaya, H. Leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity specification and lamina outgrowth: Evolution and development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1180–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Timmermans, M.; Schultes, N.; Jankovsky, J.; Nelson, T. Leafbladeless1 is required for dorsoventrality of lateral organs in maize. Development 1998, 125, 2813–2823. [Google Scholar]
  23. Waites, R.; Hudson, A. phantastica: A gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum majus. Development 1995, 121, 2143. [Google Scholar]
  24. Poethig, R.; Sussex, I. The developmental morphology and growth dynamics of the tobacco leaf. Planta 1985, 165, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mchale, N.; Marcotrigiano, M. LAM1 is required for dorsoventrality and lateral growth of the leaf blade in Nicotiana. Development 1998, 125, 4235. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sawa, S.; Watanabe, K.; Goto, K.; Kanaya, E.; Morita, E.; Okada, K. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a meristem and organ identity gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a protein with a zinc finger and HMG-related domains. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zgurski, J.M.; Sharma, R.; Bolokoski, D.A.; Schultz, E.A. Asymmetric auxin response precedes asymmetric growth and differentiation of asymmetric leaf1 and asymmetric leaf2 Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tadege, M.; Lin, H.; Bedair, M.; Berbel, A.; Wen, J.; Rojas, C.M.; Niu, L.; Tang, Y.; Sumner, L.; Ratet, P.; et al. STENOFOLIA regulates blade outgrowth and leaf vascular patterning in Medicago truncatula and Nicotiana sylvestris. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2125–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bremer, B.; Bremer, K.; Chase, M. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Plant J. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kawamura, E.; Horiguchi, G.; Tsukaya, H. Mechanisms of leaf tooth formation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 62, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reinhardt, B.; Nggi, E.H.; Ller, S.M.; Bauch, M.; Wyrzykowska, J.; Kerstetter, R.; Poethig, S.; Fleming, A.J. Restoration of DWF4 expression to the leaf margin of a dwf4 mutant is sufficient to restore leaf shape but not size: The role of the margin in leaf development. Plant J. 2007, 52, 1094–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.; Xu, B.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Huang, H.; Xu, L. YUCCA Genes are Expressed in Response to Leaf Adaxial-abaxial Juxtaposition and are Required for Leaf Margin Development. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1805–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McConnell, J.; Barton, M. Leaf polarity and meristem formation in Arabidopsis. Development 1998, 125, 2935–2942. [Google Scholar]
  34. McConnell, J.R.; Emery, J.; Eshed, Y.; Bao, N.; Bowman, J.; Barton, M.K. Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 2001, 411, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Otsuga, D.; DeGuzman, B.; Prigge, M.J.; Drews, G.N.; Clark, S.E. REVOLUTA regulates meristem initiation at lateral positions. Plant J. 2001, 25, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prigge, M.J.; Otsuga, D.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Drews, G.N.; Clark, S.E. Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family members have overlapping, antagonistic, and distinct roles in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iwakawa, H.; Iwasaki, M.; Kojima, S.; Ueno, Y.; Soma, T.; Tanaka, H.; Semiarti, E.; Machida, Y.; Machida, C. Expression of the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene in the adaxial domain of Arabidopsis leaves represses cell proliferation in this domain and is critical for the development of properly expanded leaves. Plant J. 2007, 51, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Iwakawa, H.; Ueno, Y.; Semiarti, E.; Onouchi, H.; Kojima, S.; Tsukaya, H.; Hasebe, M.; Soma, T.; Ikezaki, M.; Machida, C.; et al. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana, required for formation of a symmetric flat leaf lamina, encodes a member of a novel family of proteins characterized by cysteine repeats and a leucine zipper. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, W.-C.; Shuai, B.; Springer, P.S. The Arabidopsis LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES-domain gene ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 functions in the repression of KNOX gene expression and in adaxial-abaxial patterning. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2241–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, L.; Xu, Y.; Dong, A.; Sun, Y.; Pi, L.; Xu, Y.; Huang, H. Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity. Development 2003, 130, 4097–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sarojam, R.; Sappl, P.G.; Goldshmidt, A.; Efroni, I.; Floyd, S.K.; Eshed, Y.; Bowman, J.L. Differentiating Arabidopsis shoots from leaves by combined YABBY activities. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2113–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Siegfried, K.R.; Eshed, Y.; Baum, S.F.; Otsuga, D.; Drews, G.N.; Bowman, J.L. Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 1999, 126, 4117–4128. [Google Scholar]
  43. Eshed, Y.; Baum, S.F.; Perea, J.V.; Bowman, J.L. Establishment of polarity in lateral organs of plants. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eshed, Y.; Izhaki, A.; Baum, S.; Floyd, S.; Bowman, J. Asymmetric leaf development and blade expansion in Arabidopsis are mediated by KANADI and YABBY activities. Development 2004, 131, 2997–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kerstetter, R.A.; Bollman, K.; Taylor, R.A.; Bomblies, K.; Poethig, R.S. KANADI regulates organ polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature 2001, 411, 706–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chitwood, D.H.; Nogueira, F.T.S.; Howell, M.D.; Montgomery, T.A.; Carrington, J.C.; Timmermans, M.C.P. Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pekker, I.; Alvarez, J.P.; Eshed, Y. Auxin response factors mediate Arabidopsis organ asymmetry via modulation of KANADI activity. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2899–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waites, R.; Selvadurai, H.R.; Oliver, I.R.; Hudson, A. The PHANTASTICA gene encodes a MYB transcription factor involved in growth and dorsoventrality of lateral organs in Antirrhinum. Cell 1998, 93, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Izhaki, A.; Bowman, J.L. KANADI and class III HD-Zip gene families regulate embryo patterning and modulate auxin flow during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Emery, J.F.; Floyd, S.K.; Alvarez, J.; Eshed, Y.; Hawker, N.P.; Izhaki, A.; Baum, S.F.; Bowman, J.L. Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, G.; Lin, W.-C.; Huang, T.; Poethig, R.S.; Springer, P.S.; Kerstetter, R.A. KANADI1 regulates adaxial–abaxial polarity in Arabidopsis by directly repressing the transcription of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16392–16397. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bonaccorso, O.; Lee, J.E.; Puah, L.; Scutt, C.P.; Golz, J.F. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER controls lateral organ development by acting as both an activator and a repressor. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kelley, D.R.; Arreola, A.; Gallagher, T.L.; Gasser, C.S. ETTIN (ARF3) physically interacts with KANADI proteins to form a functional complex essential for integument development and polarity determination in Arabidopsis. Development 2012, 139, 1105–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jun, J.H.; Ha, C.M.; Fletcher, J.C. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 coordinates organ determinacy and axial polarity in arabidopsis by directly activating ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ha, C.M.; Jun, J.H.; Nam, H.G.; Fletcher, J.C. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE 1 and 2 control Arabidopsis lateral organ fate through regulation of LOB domain and adaxial-abaxial polarity genes. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1809–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nogueira, F.T.; Madi, S.; Chitwood, D.H.; Juarez, M.T.; Timmermans, M.C. Two small regulatory RNAs establish opposing fates of a developmental axis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, X. Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 25, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Voinnet, O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 2009, 136, 669–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kidner, C.A.; Martienssen, R.A. Spatially restricted microRNA directs leaf polarity through ARGONAUTE1. Nature 2004, 428, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mallory, A.; Reinhart, B.; Jones-Rhoades, M.; Tang, G. MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development: Importance of pairing to the microRNA 5' region. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 3356–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Adenot, X.; Elmayan, T.; Lauressergues, D.; Boutet, S.; Bouche, N.; Gasciolli, V.; Vaucheret, H. DRB4-dependent TAS3 trans-acting siRNAs control leaf morphology through AGO7. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 927–932. [Google Scholar]
  62. Allen, E.; Xie, Z.; Gustafson, A.M.; Carrington, J.C. microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 2005, 121, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fahlgren, N.; Montgomery, T.A.; Howell, M.D.; Allen, E.; Dvorak, S.K.; Alexander, A.L.; Carrington, J.C. Regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 by TAS3 ta-siRNA affects developmental timing and patterning in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Garcia, D.; Collier, S.A.; Byrne, M.E.; Martienssen, R.A. Specification of leaf polarity in Arabidopsis via the trans-acting siRNA pathway. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hunter, C.; Willmann, M.R.; Wu, G.; Yoshikawa, M.; de la Luz Gutierrez-Nava, M.; Poethig, S.R. Trans-acting siRNA-mediated repression of ETTIN and ARF4 regulates heteroblasty in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 2973–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lynn, K.; Fernandez, A.; Aida, M.; Sedbrook, J.; Tasaka, M.; Masson, P.; Barton, M.K. The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 1999, 126, 469–481. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhu, H.; Hu, F.; Wang, R.; Zhou, X.; Sze, S.H.; Liou, L.W.; Barefoot, A.; Dickman, M.; Zhang, X. Arabidopsis Argonaute10 specifically sequesters miR166/165 to regulate shoot apical meristem development. Cell 2011, 145, 242–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brandt, R.; Xie, Y.; Musielak, T.; Graeff, M.; Stierhof, Y.D.; Huang, H.; Liu, C.M.; Wenkel, S. Control of stem cell homeostasis via interlocking microRNA and microProtein feedback loops. Mech. Dev. 2012, 130, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wenkel, S.; Emery, J.; Hou, B.H.; Evans, M.M.; Barton, M.K. A feedback regulatory module formed by LITTLE ZIPPER and HD-ZIPIII genes. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3379–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ueno, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Terakura, S.; Iwakawa, H.; Okada, K.; Machida, C.; Machida, Y. Histone deacetylases and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 are involved in the establishment of polarity in leaves of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pinon, V.; Etchells, J.P.; Rossignol, P.; Collier, S.A.; Arroyo, J.M.; Martienssen, R.A.; Byrne, M.E. Three PIGGYBACK genes that specifically influence leaf patterning encode ribosomal proteins. Development 2008, 135, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yao, Y.; Ling, Q.; Wang, H.; Huang, H. Ribosomal proteins promote leaf adaxial identity. Development 2008, 135, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yuan, Z.; Luo, D.; Li, G.; Yao, X.; Wang, H.; Zeng, M.; Huang, H.; Cui, X. Characterization of the AE7 gene in Arabidopsis suggests that normal cell proliferation is essential for leaf polarity establishment. Plant J. 2010, 64, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Horiguchi, G.; Molla-Morales, A.; Perez-Perez, J.M.; Kojima, K.; Robles, P.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L.; Tsukaya, H. Differential contributions of ribosomal protein genes to Arabidopsis thaliana leaf development. Plant J. 2011, 65, 724–736. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kojima, S.; Iwasaki, M.; Takahashi, H.; Imai, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Fleury, D.; van Lijsebettens, M.; Machida, Y.; Machida, C. Asymmetric leaves2 and Elongator, a histone acetyltransferase complex, mediate the establishment of polarity in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1259–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Szakonyi, D.; Byrne, M.E. Ribosomal protein L27a is required for growth and patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2011, 65, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Moschopoulos, A.; Derbyshire, P.; Byrne, M.E. The Arabidopsis organelle-localized glycyl-tRNA synthetase encoded by EMBRYO DEFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT1 is required for organ patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5233–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tsukaya, H.; Byrne, M.E.; Horiguchi, G.; Sugiyama, M.; van Lijsebettens, M.; Lenhard, M. How do “housekeeping” genes control organogenesis?—Unexpected new findings on the role of housekeeping genes in cell and organ differentiation. J. Plant Res. 2013, 126, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Toyokura, K.; Watanabe, K.; Oiwaka, A.; Kusano, M.; Tameshige, T.; Tatematsu, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Tsugeki, R.; Saito, K.; Okada, K. Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase is Involved in the Robust Patterning of Arabidopsis Leaves along the Adaxial-Abaxial Axis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1340–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. La Rota, C.; Chopard, J.; Das, P.; Paindavoine, S.; Rozier, F.; Farcot, E.; Godin, C.; Traas, J.; Moneger, F. A data-driven integrative model of sepal primordium polarity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 4318–4333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Steeves, T.A.; Sussex, I.M. Patterns in plant development; Cambridge University Press.: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  82. Poethig, R.; Sussex, I.M. The cellular parameters of leaf development in tobacco: A clonal analysis. Planta 1985, 165, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Donnelly, P.M.; Bonetta, D.; Tsukaya, H.; Dengler, R.E.; Dengler, N.G. Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol. 1999, 215, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dengler, N.G.; Tsukaya, H. Leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledons: Current issues. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2001, 162, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Reinhardt, D.; Mandel, T.; Kuhlemeier, C. Auxin regulates the initiation and radial position of plant lateral organs. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 507–518. [Google Scholar]
  86. Reinhardt, D.; Wittwer, F.; Mandel, T.; Kuhlemeier, C. Localized upregulation of a new expansin gene predicts the site of leaf formation in the tomato meristem. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar]
  87. Peaucelle, A.; Louvet, R.; Johansen, J.N.; Hofte, H.; Laufs, P.; Pelloux, J.; Mouille, G. Arabidopsis phyllotaxis is controlled by the methyl-esterification status of cell-wall pectins. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 1943–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Peaucelle, A.; Braybrook, S.A.; Le Guillou, L.; Bron, E.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Hofte, H. Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kierzkowski, D.; Nakayama, N.; Routier-Kierzkowska, A.L.; Weber, A.; Bayer, E.; Schorderet, M.; Reinhardt, D.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Smith, R.S. Elastic domains regulate growth and organogenesis in the plant shoot apical meristem. Science 2012, 335, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schnittger, A.; Grini, P.E.; Folkers, U.; Hulskamp, M. Epidermal fate map of the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Dev. Biol. 1996, 175, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Irish, V.F.; Sussex, I. A fate map of the Arabidopsis embryonic shoot apical meristem. Development 1992, 115, 745–753. [Google Scholar]
  92. Lincoln, C.; Long, J.; Yamaguchi, J.; Serikawa, K.; Hake, S. A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1859–1876. [Google Scholar]
  93. Nishimura, A.; Tamaoki, M.; Sato, Y.; Matsuoka, M. The expression of tobacco knotted1-type class 1 homeobox genes correspond to regions predicted by the cytohistological zonation model. Plant J. 1999, 18, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ori, N.; Eshed, Y.; Chuck, G.; Bowman, J.L.; Hake, S. Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis shoot. Development 2000, 127, 5523–5532. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sinha, N.; Hake, S. Mutant characters of knotted maize leaves are determined in the innermost tissue layers. Dev. Biol. 1990, 141, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Smith, L.G.; Greene, B.; Veit, B.; Hake, S. A dominant mutation in the maize homeobox gene, Knotted-1, causes its ectopic expression in leaf cells with altered fates. Development 1992, 116, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  97. Timmermans, M.C.; Hudson, A.; Becraft, P.W.; Nelson, T. ROUGH SHEATH2: A Myb protein that represses knox homeobox genes in maize lateral organ primordia. Science 1999, 284, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vollbrecht, E.; Veit, B.; Sinha, N.; Hake, S. The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature 1991, 350, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Semiarti, E.; Ueno, Y.; Tsukaya, H.; Iwakawa, H.; Machida, C.; Machida, Y. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves. Development 2001, 128, 1771–1783. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hay, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Tsiantis, M. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and auxin activities converge to repress BREVIPEDICELLUS expression and promote leaf development in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 3955–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ha, C.M.; Kim, G.T.; Kim, B.C.; Jun, J.H.; Soh, M.S.; Ueno, Y.; Machida, Y.; Tsukaya, H.; Nam, H.G. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE 1 gene controls leaf pattern formation through the modulation of meristematic activity in Arabidopsis. Development 2003, 130, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ha, C.M.; Jun, J.H.; Fletcher, J.C. Control of Arabidopsis leaf morphogenesis through regulation of the YABBY and KNOX families of transcription factors. Genetics 2010, 186, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Byrne, M.E.; Barley, R.; Curtis, M.; Arroyo, J.M.; Dunham, M.; Hudson, A.; Martienssen, R.A. Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 2000, 408, 967–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Scanlon, M.J. The polar auxin transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid disrupts leaf initiation, KNOX protein regulation, and formation of leaf margins in maize. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Scanlon, M.J.; Schneeberger, R.G.; Freeling, M. The maize mutant narrow sheath fails to establish leaf margin identity in a meristematic domain. Development 1996, 122, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar]
  106. Scanlon, M.J. NARROW SHEATH1 functions from two meristematic foci during founder-cell recruitment in maize leaf development. Development 2000, 127, 4573–4585. [Google Scholar]
  107. Nardmann, J.; Ji, J.; Werr, W.; Scanlon, M.J. The maize duplicate genes narrow sheath1 and narrow sheath2 encode a conserved homeobox gene function in a lateral domain of shoot apical meristems. Development 2004, 131, 2827–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhang, Y.; Wu, R.; Qin, G.; Chen, Z.; Gu, H.; Qu, L.J. Over-expression of WOX1 leads to defects in meristem development and polyamine homeostasis in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Schiessl, K.; Kausika, S.; Southam, P.; Bush, M.; Sablowski, R. JAGGED controls growth anisotropyand coordination between cell sizeand cell cycle during plant organogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1739–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ohno, C.K.; Reddy, G.V.; Heisler, M.G.; Meyerowitz, E.M. The Arabidopsis JAGGED gene encodes a zinc finger protein that promotes leaf tissue development. Development 2004, 131, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dinneny, J.; Yadegari, R.; Fischer, R.; Yanofsky, M. The role of JAGGED in shaping lateral organs. Development 2004, 131, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dinneny, J.R.; Weigel, D.; Yanofsky, M.F. NUBBIN and JAGGED define stamen and carpel shape in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 1645–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nakata, M.; Matsumoto, N.; Tsugeki, R.; Rikirsch, E.; Laux, T.; Okada, K. Roles of the middle domain-specific WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX genes in early development of leaves in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Golz, J.; Roccaro, M.; Kuzoff, R.; Hudson, A. GRAMINIFOLIA promotes growth and polarity of Antirrhinum leaves. Development 2004, 131, 3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mchale, N. LAM-1 and FAT genes control development of the leaf blade in Nicotiana sylvestris. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1029. [Google Scholar]
  116. Ichihashi, Y.; Kawade, K.; Usami, T.; Horiguchi, G.; Takahashi, T.; Tsukaya, H. Key proliferative activity in the junction between the leaf blade and leaf petiole of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Norberg, M.; Holmlund, M.; Nilsson, O. The BLADE ON PETIOLE genes act redundantly to control the growth and development of lateral organs. Development 2005, 132, 2203–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhuang, L.L.; Ambrose, M.; Rameau, C.; Weng, L.; Yang, J.; Hu, X.H.; Luo, D.; Li, X. LATHYROIDES, encoding a WUSCHEL-related homeobox1 transcription factor, controls organ lateral growth, and regulates tendril and dorsal petal identities in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar]
  119. Vandenbussche, M.; Horstman, A.; Zethof, J.; Koes, R.; Rijpkema, A.; Gerats, T. Differential recruitment of WOX transcription factors for lateral development and organ fusion in Petunia and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2269–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Matsumoto, N.; Okada, K. A homeobox gene, PRESSED FLOWER, regulates lateral axis-dependent development of Arabidopsis flowers. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3355–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nath, U.; Crawford, B.C.; Carpenter, R.; Coen, E. Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 2003, 299, 1404–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kuchen, E.E.; Fox, S.; de Reuille, P.B.; Kennaway, R.; Bensmihen, S.; Avondo, J.; Calder, G.M.; Southam, P.; Robinson, S.; Bangham, A.; et al. Generation of leaf shape through early patterns of growth and tissue polarity. Science 2012, 335, 1092–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ferjani, A.; Horiguchi, G.; Yano, S.; Tsukaya, H. Analysis of leaf development in fugu mutants of Arabidopsis reveals three compensation modes that modulate cell expansion in determinate organs. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 988–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Narita, N.N.; Moore, S.; Horiguchi, G.; Kubo, M.; Demura, T.; Fukuda, H.; Goodrich, J.; Tsukaya, H. Overexpression of a novel small peptide ROTUNDIFOLIA4 decreases cell proliferation and alters leaf shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004, 38, 699–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ikeuchi, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kazama, T.; Ito, T.; Horiguchi, G.; Tsukaya, H. ROTUNDIFOLIA4 regulates cell proliferation along the body axis in Arabidopsis shoot. Plant Cell Physiol 2011, 52, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ichihashi, Y.; Horiguchi, G.; Gleissberg, S.; Tsukaya, H. The bHLH transcription factor SPATULA controls final leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mizukami, Y.; Fischer, R.L. Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and cell numbers during organogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hu, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chua, N.H. The Arabidopsis auxin-inducible gene ARGOS controls lateral organ size. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Feng, G.; Qin, Z.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y. Arabidopsis ORGAN SIZE RELATED1 regulates organ growth and final organ size in orchestration with ARGOS and ARL. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Horiguchi, G.; Kim, G.T.; Tsukaya, H. The transcription factor AtGRF5 and the transcription coactivator AN3 regulate cell proliferation in leaf primordia of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 43, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, B.H.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.; Pak, J.H.; Kim, J.H. The Arabidopsis GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR gene family performs an overlapping function in determining organ size as well as multiple developmental properties. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kim, J.H.; Kende, H. A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf growth and morphology in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13374–13379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Palatnik, J.F.; Allen, E.; Wu, X.; Schommer, C.; Schwab, R.; Carrington, J.C.; Weigel, D. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425, 257–263. [Google Scholar]
  134. Efroni, I.; Blum, E.; Goldshmidt, A.; Eshed, Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2293–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Anastasiou, E.; Kenz, S.; Gerstung, M.; MacLean, D.; Timmer, J.; Fleck, C.; Lenhard, M. Control of plant organ size by KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent intercellular signaling. Dev. Cell 2007, 13, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Autran, D.; Jonak, C.; Belcram, K.; Beemster, G.T.; Kronenberger, J.; Grandjean, O.; Inze, D.; Traas, J. Cell numbers and leaf development in Arabidopsis: A functional analysis of the STRUWWELPETER gene. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 6036–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rodriguez, R.E.; Mecchia, M.A.; Debernardi, J.M.; Schommer, C.; Weigel, D.; Palatnik, J.F. Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 2010, 137, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. White, D.W. PEAPOD regulates lamina size and curvature in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13238–13243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, Y.; Zheng, L.; Corke, F.; Smith, C.; Bevan, M.W. Control of final seed and organ size by the DA1 gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xu, R.; Li, Y. Control of final organ size by Mediator complex subunit 25 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2011, 138, 4545–4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kazama, T.; Ichihashi, Y.; Murata, S.; Tsukaya, H. The mechanism of cell cycle arrest front progression explained by a KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent mobile growth factor in developing leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kawade, K.; Horiguchi, G.; Tsukaya, H. Non-cell-autonomously coordinated organ size regulation in leaf development. Development 2010, 137, 4221–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bilsborough, G.D.; Runions, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Jenkins, H.W.; Hasson, A.; Galinha, C.; Laufs, P.; Hay, A.; Prusinkiewicz, P.; Tsiantis, M. Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhao, Y.; Christensen, S.K.; Fankhauser, C.; Cashman, J.R.; Cohen, J.D.; Weigel, D.; Chory, J. A role for flavin monooxygenase-like enzymes in auxin biosynthesis. Science 2001, 291, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Won, C.; Shen, X.; Mashiguchi, K.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, X.; Cheng, Y.; Kasahara, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Chory, J.; Zhao, Y. Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASES OF ARABIDOPSIS and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18518–18523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mashiguchi, K.; Tanaka, K.; Sakai, T.; Sugawara, S.; Kawaide, H.; Natsume, M.; Hanada, A.; Yaeno, T.; Shirasu, K.; Yao, H.; et al. The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18512–18517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cheng, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases controls the formation of floral organs and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hu, Y.; Poh, H.M.; Chua, N.H. The Arabidopsis ARGOS-LIKE gene regulates cell expansion during organ growth. Plant J. 2006, 47, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lincoln, C.; Britton, J.H.; Estelle, M. Growth and development of the axr1 mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar]
  150. Keller, C.P.; Stahlberg, R.; Barkawi, L.S.; Cohen, J.D. Long-term inhibition by auxin of leaf blade expansion in bean and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tsuge, T.; Tsukaya, H.; Uchimiya, H. Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development 1996, 122, 1589–1600. [Google Scholar]
  152. Nakaya, M.; Tsukaya, H.; Murakami, N.; Kato, M. Brassinosteroids control the proliferation of leaf cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kim, G.T.; Tsukaya, H.; Uchimiya, H. The ROTUNDIFOLIA3 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a new member of the cytochrome P-450 family that is required for the regulated polar elongation of leaf cells. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 2381–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kim, G.T.; Tsukaya, H.; Saito, Y.; Uchimiya, H. Changes in the shapes of leaves and flowers upon overexpression of cytochrome P450 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 9433–9437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Gonzalez, N.; de Bodt, S.; Sulpice, R.; Jikumaru, Y.; Chae, E.; Dhondt, S.; van Daele, T.; de Milde, L.; Weigel, D.; Kamiya, Y.; et al. Increased leaf size: Different means to an end. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1261–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ishiwata, A.; Ozawa, M.; Nagasaki, H.; Kato, M.; Noda, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nosaka, M.; Shimizu-Sato, S.; Nagasaki, A.; Maekawa, M.; et al. Two WUSCHEL-related homeobox Genes, narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3, Control Leaf Width in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Reinhardt, D.; Frenz, M.; Mandel, T.; Kuhlemeier, C. Microsurgical and laser ablation analysis of leaf positioning and dorsoventral patterning in tomato. Development 2005, 132, 15. [Google Scholar]
  158. Candela, H.; Johnston, R.; Gerhold, A.; Foster, T.; Hake, S. The milkweed pod1 gene encodes a KANADI protein that is required for abaxial/adaxial patterning in maize leaves. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2073–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Juarez, M.T.; Kui, J.S.; Thomas, J.; Heller, B.A.; Timmermans, M.C.P. microRNA-mediated repression of rolled leaf1 specifies maize leaf polarity. Nature 2004, 428, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  160. Fu, Y.; Xu, L.; Xu, B.; Yang, L.; Ling, Q.; Wang, H.; Huang, H. Genetic interactions between leaf polarity-controlling genes and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 in Arabidopsis leaf patterning. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. McHale, N.A.; Koning, R.E. PHANTASTICA regulates development of the adaxial mesophyll in Nicotiana leaves. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Iwasaki, M.; Nitasaka, E. The FEATHERED gene is required for polarity establishment in lateral organs especially flowers of the Japanese morning glory (I pomoea nil ). Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Szakonyi, D.; Moschopoulos, A.; Byrne, M.E. Perspectives on leaf dorsoventral polarity. J. Plant Res. 2010, 123, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kim, M.; Pham, T.; Hamidi, A.; McCormick, S.; Kuzoff, R.K.; Sinha, N. Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX genes in generating compound leaves. Development 2003, 130, 4405–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tameshige, T.; Okada, K. National Institute for Basic Biology: Okazaki, Japan, 2013; Unpublished work.
  166. Tanaka, W.; Toriba, T.; Ohmori, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Kawai, A.; Mayama-Tsuchida, T.; Ichikawa, H.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Hirano, H.Y. The YABBY gene TONGARI-BOUSHI1 is involved in lateral organ development and maintenance of meristem organization in the rice spikelet. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Juarez, M.T.; Twigg, R.W.; Timmermans, M.C. Specification of adaxial cell fate during maize leaf development. Development 2004, 131, 4533–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kumaran, M.K.; Bowman, J.L.; Sundaresan, V. YABBY polarity genes mediate the repression of KNOX homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2761–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Nole-Wilson, S.; Krizek, B.A. AINTEGUMENTA contributes to organ polarity and regulates growth of lateral organs in combination with YABBY genes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Stahle, M.I.; Kuehlich, J.; Staron, L.; von Arnim, A.G.; Golz, J.F. YABBYs and the transcriptional corepressors LEUNIG and LEUNIG_HOMOLOG maintain leaf polarity and meristem activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3105–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Aloni, R.; Schwalm, K.; Langhans, M.; Ullrich, C.I. Gradual shifts in sites of free-auxin production during leaf-primordium development and their role in vascular differentiation and leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Planta 2003, 216, 841–853. [Google Scholar]
  172. Avsian-Kretchmer, O.; Cheng, J.C.; Chen, L.; Moctezuma, E.; Sung, Z.R. Indole acetic acid distribution coincides with vascular differentiation pattern during Arabidopsis leaf ontogeny. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mattsson, J.; Sung, Z.R.; Berleth, T. Responses of plant vascular systems to auxin transport inhibition. Development 1999, 126, 2979–2991. [Google Scholar]
  174. Scarpella, E.; Marcos, D.; Friml, J.; Berleth, T. Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1015–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Brandt, R.; Salla-Martret, M.; Bou-Torrent, J.; Musielak, T.; Stahl, M.; Lanz, C.; Ott, F.; Schmid, M.; Greb, T.; Schwarz, M.; et al. Genome-wide binding-site analysis of REVOLUTA reveals a link between leaf patterning and light-mediated growth responses. Plant J. 2012, 72, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Nakata, M.; Okada, K. The three-domain model: A new model for the early development of leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1423–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Leibfried, A.; To, J.P.; Busch, W.; Stehling, S.; Kehle, A.; Demar, M.; Kieber, J.J.; Lohmann, J.U. WUSCHEL controls meristem function by direct regulation of cytokinin-inducible response regulators. Nature 2005, 438, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar]
  178. Ohmori, Y.; Tanaka, W.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Hirano, H.Y. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 is involved in meristem maintenance and is negatively regulated by the cle gene FCP1 in rice. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ikeda, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Arabidopsis WUSCHEL is a bifunctional transcription factor that acts as a repressor in stem cell regulation and as an activator in floral patterning. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3493–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lin, H.; Niu, L.; McHale, N.A.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Mysore, K.S.; Tadege, M. Evolutionarily conserved repressive activity of WOX proteins mediates leaf blade outgrowth and floral organ development in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shimizu, R.; Ji, J.; Kelsey, E.; Ohtsu, K.; Schnable, P.S.; Scanlon, M.J. Tissue-specificity and evolution of meristematic WOX3 function. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 841–850. [Google Scholar]
  182. Yao, X.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Yuan, Z.; Li, F.; Yang, L.; Huang, H. Two types of cis-acting elements control the abaxial epidermis-specific transcription of the MIR165a and MIR166a genes. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3711–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Carlsbecker, A.; Lee, J.Y.; Roberts, C.J.; Dettmer, J.; Lehesranta, S.; Zhou, J.; Lindgren, O.; Moreno-Risueno, M.A.; Vaten, A.; Thitamadee, S.; et al. Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature 2010, 465, 316–321. [Google Scholar]
  184. Marin, E.; Jouannet, V.; Herz, A.; Lokerse, A.S.; Weijers, D.; Vaucheret, H.; Nussaume, L.; Crespi, M.D.; Maizel, A. MiR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1104–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Miyashima, S.; Honda, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Tatematsu, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Sato-Nara, K.; Okada, K.; Nakajima, K. A comprehensive expression analysis of the Arabidopsis MICRORNA165/6 gene family during embryogenesis reveals a conserved role in meristem specification and a non-cell-autonomous function. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  186. Miyashima, S.; Koi, S.; Hashimoto, T.; Nakajima, K. Non-cell-autonomous microRNA165 acts in a dose-dependent manner to regulate multiple differentiation status in the Arabidopsis root. Development 2011, 138, 2303–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Yadav, R.K.; Perales, M.; Gruel, J.; Girke, T.; Jonsson, H.; Reddy, G.V. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev 2011, 25, 2025–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Horiguchi, G.; Nakayama, H.; Ishikawa, N.; Kubo, M.; Demura, T.; Fukuda, H.; Tsukaya, H. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 plays roles in adaxial/abaxial patterning and growth in leaf morphogenesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Nole-Wilson, S.; Azhakanandam, S.; Franks, R.G. Polar auxin transport together with aintegumenta and revoluta coordinate early Arabidopsis gynoecium development. Dev. Biol. 2010, 346, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Yamaguchi, T.; Yano, S.; Tsukaya, H. Genetic framework for flattened leaf blade formation in unifacial leaves of Juncus prismatocarpus. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2141–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Gleissberg, S.; Groot, E.P.; Schmalz, M.; Eichert, M.; Kolsch, A.; Hutter, S. Developmental events leading to peltate leaf structure in Tropaeolum majus (Tropaeolaceae) are associated with expression domain changes of a YABBY gene. Dev. Genes Evol. 2005, 215, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Toriba, T.; Suzaki, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ohmori, Y.; Tsukaya, H.; Hirano, H.Y. Distinct regulation of adaxial-abaxial polarity in anther patterning in rice. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nakata, M.; Okada, K. The Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary and Lamina Growth. Plants 2013, 2, 174-202. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants2020174

AMA Style

Nakata M, Okada K. The Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary and Lamina Growth. Plants. 2013; 2(2):174-202. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants2020174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nakata, Miyuki, and Kiyotaka Okada. 2013. "The Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary and Lamina Growth" Plants 2, no. 2: 174-202. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants2020174

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop