Next Article in Journal
Dedicated Path Protection with Flexible Switching Selection in Passive Optical 5G Xhaul Access Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Simulation of a High-Responsivity Dielectric Metasurface Si-Based InGaAs Photodetector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Transverse OAM Transmission through Few-Mode Fiber
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Angular Momentum Beam Generation Using Coherent Beam Combination

Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology, ul. gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2024, 11(10), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100907
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 23 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in OAM Beams: Recent Innovations and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: The significant progress observed over the last two decades in coherent beam combining (CBC) technology has mainly focused on its applications in high-energy physics and laser weapons. This work provides insight into the basic principles of CBC and the search for an alternative, namely optical angular momentum (OAM) generation using CBC. (2) Methods: A semi-analytical model based on the paraxial wave equation was explored, generating OAM-CBC beams by manipulating the tilts and phases of the CBC (T&P-CBC) of hexagonal architecture. (3) Results: The specially arranged T&P-CBC shows typical properties of OAM, such as annular profiles for the zero diffraction order and 1st-order replicas in the far field and correlation coefficients of 1% between different OAM-CBC fields. (4) Conclusions: The differences between classical OAM beams and OAM-CBC are substantial due to hexagonal lattice properties. Moreover, applications in free space optical communications are feasible as T&P CBC fulfills the main conditions and requirements for OAM generation.

1. Introduction

Coherent beam combination (CBC) technology, including filled aperture CBC (FA-CBC) and tiled aperture CBC (TA-CBC) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], has been developed in the last two decades, mainly for applications in laser weapons [4,12] and high-energy physics [6,10]. FA-CBC offers high efficiency and robustness, but it is limited by the number of emitters (not higher than 12 beams for a high-average-power system [13]). In contrast, TA-CBC offers direct scalability beyond hundreds of combined beams, but has low practical efficiency [5,10,11] and difficulty scaling to high average powers. Both technologies require effective adaptive optics subsystems for outdoor applications, such as laser weapons and free-space optical communications (FSOC), over long propagation distances in horizontal directions [8,9,14,15] and/or in Earth–satellite FSOC links [16,17,18].
Since the 1990s, optical angular momentum (OAM) beams have been examined theoretically and experimentally, attracting [19,20,21,22,23] growing interest in material processing, optical tweezing and FSOC [16,18,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The benefits of OAM technology include propagation invariance as ‘diffraction-free’ solutions of paraxial wave equations, enhanced resilience to atmospheric turbulence and orthogonality, enabling potential increases in FSOC channel bandwidth thanks to spatial multiplexing. However, its scalability in power and practical realization in laboratory and outdoor applications are problematic for a single-aperture output.
The purpose of this study was to merge both technologies, that is, to search for the possibilities of CBC technology for the generation of OAM beams (OAM-CBC). Preliminary results were presented in [29], where a segmented vortex wavefront was constructed in the near field owing to a special helix-like stepped phase shift in the hexagonal lattice. Here, we develop this approach for a special tilted and phased CBC (T&P-CBC) concept, enabling the effective construction of segmented vortex wavefronts in the near field. Section 2 describes the semi-analytical model of CBC propagation and the OAM-CBC concept. The main results, analysis, and discussion are presented in Section 3, and conclusions are drawn in Section 4.

2. Tilted and Phased CBC for Optical Angular Momentum Generation

Here, we give only a brief description of the analysis method. The full mathematical model is described in detail in [30,31]. To start, we provide the main characteristics of CBC hexagonal architecture (see Figure 1). The center and chief ray directions of each (l, n)-th emitter/beam of the CBC are defined by the geometry of the hexagonal lattice; Ncr is the number of crowns; Nlat = 3Ncr (Ncr + 1) + 1 is the number of emitters; a is the half period of the lattice; ra is the sub-aperture radius; f.f. = ra/a is the filling factor; and f is the focal length. In the classical CBC configuration, each chief ray is directed to the common focal point F, with a spherical segmented wavefront of the CBC lattice of the radius f. The diffraction profiles of CBC in the far field are characterized by the Airy radius rAiry = 0.61λ/NAlat and Fresnel range ZFresnel = λ/NAlat2, where NAlat = (Ncr + 1/2)2a/f. is the numerical aperture of the lattice and λ is the wavelength.
We applied a truncated Gaussian beam as a ‘prototype’ optical field. To simplify calculations, we used the once-determined and calculated approximate solution of a truncated Gaussian beam for the given beam radius w1 at the aperture and truncation level εtr = exp(−2(ra/w1)2) (see [32]), which is valid over a wide range of propagation distances in the vicinity of focal point F. Note that the ratio of the Rayleigh range of an individual beam to the caustics length defined by the Fresnel range is proportional to Ncr2. Typically, for long-distance propagation, the Rayleigh range is comparable to f (‘collimation case’), whereas the Fresnel range is Nlat times shorter. We calculated the coherent sum of all input beams for the specific distribution of phases and tilts for a chosen plane near focal point F.
Evidently, various T&P-CBC realizations exist in the (1 + 3) × Nlat dimensional space of the control parameters. The exploration of this subject is far beyond the scope of this study. Here, we focus on the OAM-CBC case. We define a specific segmented vortex wavefront with a step-like helix phase and tilt vector [θx, θy] in the near field as follows:
The OAM-CBC amplitude B m OAM with the given m OAM —optical angular momentum number can be described as follows:
B m OAM = l , n A l , n exp i k Φ l , n where Φ l , n = r l , n 2 f + m OAM φ l , n k
Here, l and n are the indices of the sub-aperture, Al,n is the amplitude of the (l, n) sub-aperture, rl,n and φl,n are the radius to the lattice center and the azimuth angle of each sub-aperture, f is the focal length, and k is the wavenumber.
Next, we the calculate vortex tilt vector [θx, θy] by the gradient Φ l , n as follows:
Φ l , n = θ x , l , n , θ y , l , n = r l , n cos φ l , n f + m OAM sin φ l , n k r l , n , r l , n sin φ l , n f m OAM cos φ l , n k r l , n
Note that for m OAM ≠ 0, the geometrical-optics caustics of the OAM-CBC vortex segmented wavefront has a coiling non-linear helix shape with an inner hole (lower right part of Figure 1) corresponding to the evolving hexagonal helix of the CBC in the near field (upper left part in Figure 1). The coiling helix for mOAM = 0 transforms into a distinct focal point F for the classical spherical CBC case. This phenomenon is a direct geometrical-optics interpretation of vanishing irradiance at r = 0 and an annular amplitude distribution in caustics for the vortex OAM beam.

3. Results

We tested the proposed OAM-CBC concept for a large hexagonal lattice consisting of Ncr = 6 outer crowns (Nlat = 127 emitters), assuming very dense packing (f.f. = 0.99). To neglect the peculiarities of diffraction, we assumed low truncation losses εtr = 0.05. Thus, an ‘almost’ Gaussian beam was emitted by an individual emitter with a very low power content at higher diffraction orders in the caustics region. The hexagonal architecture of the CBC reflects the six-folded symmetry of the 1st diffraction orders (see Figure 2).
The basic compliance between the geometrical-optics caustics (Figure 1) and wave optics demonstrate a dominant annular profile in the zero-order diffraction area (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). In Figure 2, the irradiance maps for m OAM > 0 (Figure 2b–d) exhibit the expected properties of the conjunction of CBC and OAM beams. The zero-diffraction order has a nearly annular shape and the 1st diffraction orders resemble its replicas.
The typical dependencies of the far field profiles and power-in-bucket (PIB) curves for OAM-CBC are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
With an increase in m OAM , the amplitude profiles worsen with flattening and dissipation of power density out of the low diffraction lobes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Moreover, above m OAM > 5, the 2D maps resemble the aberrated and scattered partly coherent beams with the minimum at the axis. These features are particularly highlighted for m OAM = 6 (Figure 2d), for which the six-fold symmetries of the vortex and hexagonal lattice overlap.
To examine the orthogonality of a set of OAM-CBC amplitude profiles in the far field and their feasibility in FSOC, we calculated the correlation coefficients γm,k defined as follows:
γ m , k = B m B k * B m B m * B k B k *
where B m B k * denotes the discrete 2D summation of B m B k * over a finite area in the far field; (15 × 15 rAiry in our case).
The results of the γm,k calculations for a trail of nine configurations with m OAM ϵ [0, 8] are collected in Table 1.
Nonperfect orthogonality is caused by the characteristics of the OAM-CBC concept (discrete 2D array of hexagonal symmetry), numerical errors, the approximate solution of the truncated Gaussian beam, and discrete summation over a limited area.
The values of γm,k were in the range [0.0048, 0.1]. For a narrow range of m OAM ϵ [0, 5] the average correlation coefficient γm,k = 0.7%, whereas for a m OAM ϵ [0, 8] it increases to 1.5%. We suppose that a correlation coefficient of 1%, corresponding to the cross-channel crosstalk, is acceptable for practical applications in FSOC. Thus, we can conclude that the T&P-CBC sufficiently satisfies the main conditions and requirements of OAM generation.

4. Conclusions

Our numerical experiments demonstrated the feasibility of the merging of OAM and CBC technologies. For a densely packed CBC hexagonal array, the vortex wavefront was emulated with a step-like evolving helix of phase and tilt vectors in the near field.
i/ The irradiance maps for m OAM > 0 exhibit the expected properties of a combination of CBC and OAM beams. The zero-diffraction order has a nearly annular shape and the 1st diffraction orders resemble its replicas. However, the differences between classical OAM beams and OAM-CBC are substantial owing to their hexagonal lattice properties.
ii/ The imperfect orthogonality of the OAM-CBC set is attributed to the specific characteristics of the OAM-CBC concept (discrete 2D array of hexagonal symmetry), numerical errors and discrete summation over a limited area. For the m OAM range of [0, 5], the average correlation coefficient, corresponding to cross-channel crosstalk, is 0.7%, which is acceptable for practical applications in FSOC.
We conclude that the proposed T&P-CBC concept fulfills the primary conditions and requirements for OAM generation. In further research, we intend to examine the rules of OAM-CBC algebra and the impact of lattice architecture parameters and imperfections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J. and W.Z.; methodology, L.G., W.Z. and J.J.; software, P.G. and L.G.; data curation, P.G.; writing—J.J.; writing—review and editing, P.G. and J.J.; visualization, P.G.; supervision, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Janusz Mikołajczyk and Aluś Emo Capodilista for their helpful support and discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brignon, A. Coherent Laser Beam Combining, 2013th ed.; Brignon, A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; ISBN 978-3-527-65280-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fathi, H.; Närhi, M.; Gumenyuk, R. Towards Ultimate High-Power Scaling: Coherent Beam Combining of Fiber Lasers. Photonics 2021, 8, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fan, T.Y. Laser Beam Combining for High-Power, High-Radiance Sources. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2005, 11, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Zandt, N.R.; Cusumano, S.J.; Bartell, R.J.; Basu, S.; McCrae, J.E.; Fiorino, S.T. Comparison of Coherent and Incoherent Laser Beam Combination for Tactical Engagements. Opt. Eng. 2012, 51, 104301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shpakovych, M.; Maulion, G.; Kermene, V.; Boju, A.; Armand, P.; Desfarges-Berthelemot, A.; Barthélemy, A. Experimental Phase Control of a 100 Laser Beam Array with Quasi-Reinforcement Learning of a Neural Network in an Error Reduction Loop. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 12307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mourou, G.; Brocklesby, B.; Tajima, T.; Limpert, J. The Future Is Fibre Accelerators. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leshchenko, V.E. Coherent Combining Efficiency in Tiled and Filled Aperture Approaches. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 15944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jabczyński, J.K.; Gontar, P. Impact of Atmospheric Turbulence on Coherent Beam Combining for Laser Weapon Systems. Def. Technol. 2021, 17, 1160–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weyrauch, T.; Vorontsov, M.; Mangano, J.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Bricker, D.; Polnau, E.; Rostov, A. Deep Turbulence Effects Mitigation with Coherent Combining of 21 Laser Beams over 7 Km. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fsaifes, I.; Daniault, L.; Bellanger, S.; Veinhard, M.; Bourderionnet, J.; Larat, C.; Lallier, E.; Durand, E.; Brignon, A.; Chanteloup, J.-C. Coherent Beam Combining of 61 Femtosecond Fiber Amplifiers. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 20152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, H.; Chang, Q.; Xi, J.; Hou, T.; Su, R.; Ma, P.; Wu, J.; Li, C.; Jiang, M.; Ma, Y.; et al. First Experimental Demonstration of Coherent Beam Combining of More than 100 Beams. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sprangle, P.; Ting, A.; Peñano, J.; Fischer, R.; Hafizi, B. Incoherent Combining and Atmospheric Propagation of High-Power Fiber Lasers for Directed-Energy Applications. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2009, 45, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Müller, M.; Aleshire, C.; Klenke, A.; Haddad, E.; Légaré, F.; Tünnermann, A.; Limpert, J. 10.4 KW Coherently Combined Ultrafast Fiber Laser. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vorontsov, M.; Filimonov, G.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Polnau, E.; Lachinova, S.; Weyrauch, T.; Mangano, J. Comparative Efficiency Analysis of Fiber-Array and Conventional Beam Director Systems in Volume Turbulence. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Weyrauch, T.; Vorontsov, M.A.; Carhart, G.W.; Beresnev, L.A.; Rostov, A.P.; Polnau, E.E.; Liu, J.J. Experimental Demonstration of Coherent Beam Combining over a 7 km Propagation Path. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 4455–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Meric, H. Atmospheric Turbulence Modeling and Aperture Analysis for Optimizing Receiver Design and System Performance on Free Space Optical Communication Links. Master’s Thesis, Bilkent Universitesi, Ankara, Türkiye, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Andrews, L.C.; Phillips, R.L. Laser Beam Propagation through Random Media; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2005; ISBN 0-8194-5948-8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stotts, L.B.; Andrews, L.C. Optical Communications in Turbulence: A Tutorial. Opt. Eng. 2023, 63, 041207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Allen, L.; Barnett, S.M.; Padgett, M.J. Optical Angular Momentum; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 9781482269017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lian, Y.; Qi, X.; Wang, Y.; Bai, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z. OAM Beam Generation in Space and Its Applications: A Review. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2022, 151, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shiri, A.; Gbur, G. Orbital Angular Momentum Spectrum of Model Partially Coherent Beams in Turbulence. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 18175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, Q.; Ma, P.; Su, R.; Wu, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, P. High-Power Vortex Beam Generation Enabled by a Phased Beam Array Fed at the Nonfocal-Plane. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, T.; Xia, H.; Xie, W.; Peng, Y. Orbital Angular Momentum Mode Detection of the Combined Vortex Beam Generated by Coherent Combining Technology. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 35795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vetter, C.; Steinkopf, R.; Bergner, K.; Ornigotti, M.; Nolte, S.; Gross, H.; Szameit, A. Realization of Free-Space Long-Distance Self-Healing Bessel Beams. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019, 13, 1900103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rouzé, B.; Lombard, L.; Jacqmin, H.; Liméry, A.; Durécu, A.; Bourdon, P. Coherent Beam Combination of Seven 1.5 Μm Fiber Amplifiers through up to 1 Km Atmospheric Turbulence: Near- and Far-Field Experimental Analysis. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 8524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Doster, T.; Watnik, A.T. Laguerre–Gauss and Bessel–Gauss Beams Propagation through Turbulence: Analysis of Channel Efficiency. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 10239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fiorino, S.T.; Bartell, R.J.; Krizo, M.J.; Caylor, G.L.; Moore, K.P.; Harris, T.R.; Cusumano, S.J. A First Principles Atmospheric Propagation & Characterization Tool: The Laser Environmental Effects Definition and Reference (LEEDR). In Atmospheric Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves II; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2008; Volume 6878, pp. 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  28. Aksenov, V.P.; Dudorov, V.V.; Filimonov, G.A.; Kolosov, V.V.; Venediktov, V.Y. Vortex Beams with Zero Orbital Angular Momentum and Non-Zero Topological Charge. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 104, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jabczynski, J.K.; Gontar, P.; Gorajek, L.; Zendzian, W. Segmented Vortex Wavefront Coherent Beam Combining. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 045223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jabczynski, J.K.; Gontar, P. Analysis of the Caustics of Partially Coherently Combined Truncated Gaussian Beams. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jabczyński, J.K.; Gontar, P.; Gorajek, Ł.; Żendzian, W. Simplified Sensitivity Analysis of Coherent Beam Combining in a Tiled Aperture Architecture. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 5012–5019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ding, D.; Liu, X. Approximate Description for Bessel, Bessel-Gauss, and Gaussian Beams with Finite Aperture. JOSA A 1999, 16, 1286–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Concept of optical angular momentum–coherent beam combining (OAM-CBC) generation via tilted and phased CBC.
Figure 1. Concept of optical angular momentum–coherent beam combining (OAM-CBC) generation via tilted and phased CBC.
Photonics 11 00907 g001
Figure 2. Two-dimensional maps of OAM-CBC irradiance distributions (in logarithmic scale) in the far field for optical angular momentum number; (a) m OAM = 0; (b) 2; (c) 4; (d) 6; Nlat = 127, f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05.
Figure 2. Two-dimensional maps of OAM-CBC irradiance distributions (in logarithmic scale) in the far field for optical angular momentum number; (a) m OAM = 0; (b) 2; (c) 4; (d) 6; Nlat = 127, f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05.
Photonics 11 00907 g002
Figure 3. Irradiance profiles in the far field for m OAM ϵ [0, 8]; f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
Figure 3. Irradiance profiles in the far field for m OAM ϵ [0, 8]; f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
Photonics 11 00907 g003
Figure 4. Power-in-bucket curves for m OAM ϵ [0, 8]; f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
Figure 4. Power-in-bucket curves for m OAM ϵ [0, 8]; f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
Photonics 11 00907 g004
Table 1. Correlation coefficients for OAM-CBC amplitude profiles in the far field; m OAM ϵ [0, 8], f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
Table 1. Correlation coefficients for OAM-CBC amplitude profiles in the far field; m OAM ϵ [0, 8], f.f. = 0.99, εtr = 0.05, Nlat = 127.
m O A M
012345678
01.000000.008440.008750.009240.009860.010000.101000.012000.01200
10.008441.000000.004840.005070.005410.005700.008480.088000.00701
20.008750.004841.000000.005300.005620.005990.008620.006810.09500
30.009240.005070.005301.000000.005920.006210.009180.007700.00768
40.009860.005410.005620.005921.000000.006690.009580.007610.00843
50.010000.005700.005990.006210.006691.000000.010000.00846 0.00868
60.101000.008480.008620.009180.009580.010001.000000.011000.01200
70.012000.088000.006810.007700.007610.008460.011001.000000.00987
80.012000.007010.095000.007680.008430.008680.012000.009871.00000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gontar, P.; Gorajek, L.; Zendzian, W.; Jabczyński, J. Optical Angular Momentum Beam Generation Using Coherent Beam Combination. Photonics 2024, 11, 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100907

AMA Style

Gontar P, Gorajek L, Zendzian W, Jabczyński J. Optical Angular Momentum Beam Generation Using Coherent Beam Combination. Photonics. 2024; 11(10):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gontar, Przemyslaw, Lukasz Gorajek, Waldemar Zendzian, and Jan Jabczyński. 2024. "Optical Angular Momentum Beam Generation Using Coherent Beam Combination" Photonics 11, no. 10: 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop