Next Article in Journal
Maximizing Student Clinical Communication Skills in Dental Education—A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Moderate to Severe Periodontitis in an 18–19th Century Sample—St. Bride’s Lower Churchyard (London, UK)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Dentistry Journal
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/dj10040055
dentistry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy

by
Mara Gaile
1,*,
Evaggelia Papia
2,
Vita Zalite
3,
Janis Locs
3 and
Una Soboleva
1
1
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
2
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
3
Rudolfs Cimdins Riga Biomaterials Innovations and Development Centre, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Institute of General Chemical Engineering, Riga Technical University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2022, 10(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective was to compare marginal defects and evaluate discoloration for adhesively cemented veneers in vitro when using two cement removal techniques. Twenty premolars were prepared with chamfer and borders in enamel. IPS e.max CAD veneers were cemented using Panavia V5 and divided in two groups (n = 10): cement excess removed with a probe after tack-curing for 3–5 s, or cement excess removed with a brush, then completely polymerized. All teeth were stored in alginate gel until micro-CT examination. Scanning was performed twice: directly after cementation and after thermocycling (5000 cycles, between 5 and 55 °C). To analyze discoloration, teeth were colored using 0.5% basic fuchsine and examined under a stereomicroscope. Depth of dye infiltration was scored 0 (no discoloration) to 5 (discoloration along the entire margin). Statistically significant differences of cement defects before thermocycling were reported, where brushing showed more defects than probing (p = 0.0161). After thermocycling, the defects increased for both groups. Extensive discoloration was the most common (55.56%) when removing excess by probing; by brushing, 90% of the specimens exhibited slight discoloration (p = 0.008). Regression analysis showed no relationship between type of defect and degree of discoloration. Removing cement with a brush causes more marginal defects, however less discoloration after thermocycling.

1. Introduction

Adhesively cemented porcelain veneers are widely used in aesthetic dentistry, and the clinical outcome has been proven to be with good prognosis, especially if the preparation is located completely in enamel and if correct adhesive treatment procedures are carried out [1]. In the literature, it is reported that porcelain veneers show high long-term survival rates, such as 87–94% after 9 years, depending on the used material [2]. Data from a recent systematic literature review with an emphasis on complications reports 95.5% in a 10-year estimated cumulative survival rate (CSR) with veneer fracture, debonding, secondary caries, and need of endodontic treatment being the most common reasons for failure. Fracture and debonding were more commonly happening within the first years after cementation [3]. Another systematic review with meta-analysis cites severe marginal discoloration (2%) as one of the frequent issues, apart from those mentioned previously [2].
The use of adhesive cementation results in significant strengthening of the ceramic restoration, thereby impacting the clinical performance. The strengthening is dependent on the creation of a resin–ceramic hybrid layer sensitive to cementation variables such as ceramic surface treatment and the type of resin-based cement, as well as clinical handling technique [4].
Hydrofluoric acid etching of ceramics provides surface roughening, which significantly increases the bond strength. Etching is considered the most significant factor in creating high bond strengths between ceramics and resin-based cements [5,6,7]. An etched ceramic surface is coated with silane, which acts as a coupling agent and improves adhesion with resin cements [8]. Silanes are bifunctional molecules that bond silicone dioxide with the OH groups on the ceramic surface. They also have a degradable functional group that copolymerizes with the organic matrix of the resin. The application of a silane coupling agent to the etched ceramic surface provides a chemical covalent and hydrogen bond [9].
Different resin cement systems have been suggested for the cementation of porcelain veneers. There are several factors that have to be considered when choosing the most appropriate cement for each clinical situation, such as the properties of the restorative material used, working times, cost, technique sensitivity, as well as the possibility to clean cement residue. Various cement removal and finishing techniques are recommended by different authors; for example, removing unpolymerized residual cement with a brush moistened with a bonding agent [10,11], tack-curing (initial short light curing to achieve a gel-like state for easier excess cement clean-up) [12], or combining multiple techniques (removing unpolymerized cement excess with a brush, followed by tack-curing and removal with a probe) [13], which could influence long term results of cementation [10,12,13]. Since possible color change (discoloration of the margin) is a very common problem for porcelain veneers in the long term, it is important to understand the most optimal procedure to minimize it. Thus far, possible effects of various cement removal techniques on discoloration have not been widely investigated. Therefore, in the current study, two techniques suggested by the manufacturer were compared: tack-curing following removal with a probe, or removal with a brush before complete polymerization. The hypothesis of the study was that the number of defects in the cement layer correlate with discoloration intensity.
The aim of this study was to compare two different resin cement removal techniques by evaluating the number of marginal defects and levels of discoloration in vitro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Inclusion of Samples

This in vitro study included 20 intact premolars extracted at the RSU Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery (April 2020 to October 2020) due to orthodontic or periodontal indications. The study was approved by the local research and ethics committee (permit number 6-3/5/46). Exclusion criteria were as follows: caries, extensive restorations, abrasions, cracks, and hypocalcifications. Teeth were manually cleaned of plaque, calculus, and remaining periodontal tissue using an ultrasonic scaler (PiezoLED, KaVo Dental) and kept in physiologic saline solution in a refrigerator until the beginning of the study. All teeth were tested less than 6 months after extraction. Specimen preparation, cementation, and measurement principles were developed together with a supervisor and all following steps were carried out by a single operator.

2.2. Tooth Preparation

The shape of each tooth preparation was prefabricated from adhesive tape to ensure similar dimensions for all preparations. The preparation outline shape was placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth and marked with a waterproof marker before starting the preparation. Preparations were undertaken using a cylindrical round end diamond bur. Vestibular surfaces of teeth were prepared approximately 0.5 mm deep with rounded corners and a chamfer finish line, keeping enamel around all borders (Figure 1a,b).

2.3. Veneer Fabrication

After preparation, the teeth were fixed in putty silicone bases to ensure better control during further clinical and laboratory steps (Figure 2a). The prepared teeth were scanned using a Ceramill Map 600 scanner (Amann Girrbach AG, Koblach, Austria), and the designing of each veneer was undertaken using Ceramill Mind software (Amann Girrbach AG) (Figure 2b). The cement gap was set to 0.02 mm, the milling device was a Ceramill Motion 2 (Amann Girrbach AG), and IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Zurich, Switzerland) material was used for milling the veneers. All further laboratory steps were performed according to manufacturer instructions for use, using crystallization and firing parameters provided by the manufacturer [14].

2.4. Cementation

All specimens (n = 20) were divided in two groups before cementation, as shown in Figure 3.
The Panavia V5 (Kuraray Noritake, Tokyo, Japan) cement system was used for cementation. Cementation steps were carried out by the same operator according to the instruction provided by the cement manufacturer [15], and two cement removal techniques recommended in the instruction were used: tack-curing and following removal with a probe, or removal of unpolymerized cement excess with a brush. Before cementation, the teeth were fixed in putty silicone blocks to ensure stabilization and the veneers were cemented, adapting them on a tooth surface with an instrument and then using finger pressure. After cementation, restoration margins were thoroughly polished using polishing discs (Sof-Lex, 3M) and rubber polishers. After the cementation procedure, each specimen was placed in a plastic container (40 mm length; 10 mm diameter) in translucent alginate gel and stored in a room temperature of approximately 20 °C before further examination.

2.5. Thermocycling

Thermocycling (Thermocycler 1100/1200, SD Mechatronik, Feldkirchen-Westerham, Germany) was performed for 5000 cycles. A cycle lasted for a total of 60 s: 20 s in two baths containing distilled water, with temperatures of 5 and 55 °C, respectively, and with 10 s transfer time between the baths.

2.6. Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Evaluation

All specimens (n = 20) were examined using micro-CT (µCT 50, Scanco Medical AG, Wangen, Switzerland) to assess the amount and character of marginal defects. Alginate gel-filled containers with the specimens were fixed in sample holders that were rotated to provide adequate X-ray exposure. Parameters used for scanning are shown in Table 1. Scanning was conducted in a segment, starting 2 mm from the tip of the cusp (Figure 4), with the intent to exclude any anatomical differences. For each tooth, 413 micro-CT slices were obtained.
After scanning, both sides of each specimen were examined, and data were collected using MS Excel.
Before and after thermocycling for each specimen, micro-CT images were evaluated:
  • Number of structural defects next to enamel, next to the veneer, and in the cement layer;
  • Sum of overall structural defects;
  • Number of slices with cement layer underfill/irrelevant overfill/wide overfill.
Micro-CT examination was conducted twice. Data collection steps are shown in Figure 5.

2.7. Coloring

After thermocycling, coloring of the specimens was performed according to the method proposed in the previous study by Haralur et al. (2018) [16]. Apical foramina were closed with glass ionomer cement before coloring. All tooth surfaces, except for 1 mm around the veneer margin, were coated with nail varnish and then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After coloring, the specimens were polished thoroughly to remove the dye on the surface and sectioned facio-lingually using a 0.5 mm low speed diamond disk (Figure 6). One veneer debonded during the sectioning process, and thus was excluded from further microscopic examination.
Both hemi-sections were evaluated under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16 A, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) using 20× magnification. All micro-CT measurements and microscopic evaluation of discoloration were undertaken by one calibrated operator.
Intensity of discoloration was evaluated according to the scheme: 0—no discoloration; 1—slight discoloration (not exceeding chamfer preparation margins cervically/edge occlusally); 2—extensive discoloration (color diffused deeper in the cement layer) (Figure 7).
Additionally, the depth of dye penetration was scored 0 to 5 according to the scheme proposed previously by Haralur et al. (2018) [16].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Specimen groups were encrypted for the statistical analysis. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for the type of defect and degree of discoloration (0–5). Statistical significance of differences in mean values between groups before and after thermocycling were assessed using Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Difference in distribution of discoloration between groups was assessed using the Fischer exact test. Multivariate regression analysis (mvreg) was performed to assess a possible relationship between the type of defect and degree of discoloration. The level of significance was set to α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Size and Character of Defects

There were statistically significant differences in mean value of structural cement layer defects between probe group and brush group before thermocycling. Before thermocycling, brushing showed more defects in total than the probe group (p = 0.0161). After thermocycling, total count of defects increased for both groups (Figure 8).
Example of defect progression on micro-CT scans after thermocycling is visible in Figure 9, where small defects and cement layer overfill are visible.
The brush group had a higher mean value of defects in the cement layer prior to thermocycling than the probe group (p = 0.0225), which showed more wide overfills (p = 0.0476). For detailed distribution of defect types and progression in both groups, see Table 2.

3.2. Comparison of Discoloration

3.2.1. Intensity of Discoloration

Only one specimen from each group had no discoloration (score 0). In the probe group, one-third of the specimens exhibited slight discoloration (score 1), and extensive discoloration (score 2) was the most common in this group (55.56%). In the brush group, 90% of the specimens exhibited slight discoloration (score 1). Extensive discoloration was not observed in the brush group at all (p = 0.008) (Figure 10).

3.2.2. Depth of Dye Penetration

Analysis of the dye penetration depth showed a higher mean for the probe group (2.67 SD = 2.00 vs. 1.10 SD = 0.57; p < 0.001).
Multivariate regression analysis showed no relationship between the type of defect and degree of discoloration.

4. Discussion

The results of our study show that the number of defects does not correlate with discoloration intensity, although initially it was expected to have a connection between a higher degree of discoloration and increased number of defects. An incomplete polymerization could be one of the factors influencing discoloration intensity. The effect of different polymerization strategies should be investigated further since the group where tack-curing was undertaken showed more discoloration, despite having less cement layer defects. There is a remaining question about the influence of continuous polymerization in preventing cement layer discoloration since the group where tack-curing was performed showed more discoloration, despite having less cement layer defects.
Clinical success depends on degree of conversion (DC), which influences polymerization shrinkage (PS) of resin cement. Dual-cure resin cements can either be light cured or used in self-cure mode since they contain both photo and chemical initiators. However, light curing of these cements is beneficial to achieve optimal DC and minimize PS [17]. As cements with high shrinkage are more dimensionally unstable, they can lead to marginal leakage and discoloration [18]. Few studies on tack-curing have been undertaken previously. Further, it has been concluded that tack-curing causes slight surface hardness reduction and slightly lower DC in resin cements, but this should not be significant clinically [12,19]. However, aforementioned are in vitro studies with no clinical or long-term evaluation, and additional research on this topic would be useful since our study shows that the tack-cured group had more discoloration after thermocycling, despite having less cement layer defects.
Color stability and resistance to staining are important clinical aspects when choosing appropriate cement for veneer cementation. The literature reports that dual-polymerization and light-polymerizing resin-based cements both show good clinical performance when used for cementation of porcelain veneers [20], and they show similar color stability [21,22]. However, marginal discoloration increases over a 2-year period for both cement systems [22]. Resin cements tend to show varying degrees of discoloration, especially at the exposed cement margins for dual-cure cements [23]. Apart from curing mode, there is also a discussion about the most appropriate pre-treatment protocol and adhesive. Adhesives have evolved tremendously over the years and have been made more simple for use. However, simplicity does not always mean improvement, and it is very important to choose the most appropriate adhesive for each clinical situation and to follow the manufacturer’s instructions precisely [24]. Self-adhesive self-cure cement systems show inferior color stability when compared to that of the total-etch light-cure cement or self-adhesive dual-cure cement [25]. In an article by Haralur et al., where different pre-treatment methods and cement systems were compared, the etch-wash method with a dual-cure cement system showed the lowest interfacial microleakage in cervical and incisal regions when compared to etch-wash light cure, self-etch, and self-adhesive techniques. The highest leakage was recorded with self-adhesive resin luting cements [16]. These findings were confirmed in another study, where the results were explained by an insufficient etching ability of the cement to smear layer-covered enamel. Therefore, phosphoric acid etching is recommended prior to the self-etch adhesive application to adequately etch enamel before cementation of porcelain veneers [26]. Another additional pre-treatment step, especially when bonding to dentine, is surface sandblasting prior to etching, which has shown to increase adhesive strength [27].
Universal adhesives that can be used for direct and indirect restorations have gained popularity due to the simplicity of use and their effectiveness (can bond to methacrylate-based restoratives and cements, tooth, metal, zirconia), thanks to the inclusion of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen-phosphate (10-MDP) [24]. Based on available information from the literature in the current study, the 10-MDP-containing dual-cure resin cement system Panavia V5 was used because it displays low technique sensitivity and provides good adhesion to enamel and to dentin [28]. It has been shown that Panavia V5 can be successfully combined with different CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) ceramic materials in vitro (including IPS e.max CAD used in this study); these combinations are also suggested for clinical application [29]. In addition, Panavia V5 shows the highest shear bond strength—specifically between IPS e.max CAD ceramics and dentin—when compared to self-adhesive, self-etching cements [30], as well as the lowest degree of microleakage in comparison to other dual-cure cements [31].
In the current in vitro study, intact premolar teeth that were extracted due to orthodontic or periodontal indications were used. Premolar location is not the most typical for porcelain veneers, and experiment results for incisor group teeth could be slightly different because of discrepancies in tooth size and anatomy. However, these differences may not be clinically significant since one of the main factors influencing outcome is the presence of enamel around all borders [1]. Another potential limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size confined to our inclusion/exclusion criteria and limited availability of biological material.
There is an ongoing discussion about whether machinable or heat-pressed veneers provide better adaptation. In an in vitro study from 2012, pressable ceramic laminate veneers showed better marginal adaptation, thinner cement film thickness, and improved resistance to microleakage when compared to machinable ceramic veneers [32]. More recently, a clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up reports that the fabrication method, whether CAD/CAM or heat-pressed, has no effect on the marginal and internal adaptation of porcelain laminate veneers, and both techniques perform well clinically [33]. Since CAD/CAM techniques are constantly developing and are used more and more frequently in clinical settings, the decision was made to use the digital manufacturing process in the current study.
In the current study, specimens were fixed in putty silicone blocks to ensure stabilization and veneers were cemented, adapting them on a tooth surface with an instrument and then using finger pressure. Other techniques, such as the use of ultrasound, have been reported in previous in vitro studies as being successful in reducing the gap distance at the tooth/ceramic interface [34]. Moreover, constant seating pressure during the adhesive cementation procedure (1.25 MPa for 3 min) has the potential to improve microtensile bond strength [35]. This variable was not monitored in this study and could have influence on the width of cement gap between the tooth and the veneer. However, this is applicable to clinical conditions where seating pressure is also not monitored routinely.
During the veneer cementation process, it is critical to ensure that all border irregularities are filled with resin cement, which is polished well after polymerization. However, non-polished cement overfill is frequently seen around veneer borders [36]. The present study reports similar results, with different degrees of cement overfills present in both groups. These findings can be easily explained since non-polished cement overfills were visible well under microscope and in micro-CT scans under great magnifications. However, clinically it would not be possible to examine the borders of each veneer under such circumstances. Interestingly, overfills decreased after thermocycling, which could be explained by composite resin matrix dissolution in water following cement contour smoothening. The question remains—How clinically significant are such small amounts of cement overfill, and can they cause any problems in the long term, such as cement layer discoloration?
One of the factors that influences the outcome of an in vitro study conducted on extracted teeth is specimen storage and sterilization. When comparing different types of storage media, it was shown that saline and 5.25% NaClO significantly lowered shear bond strength values (composite to dentin) and are not recommended for such studies. Sterilization with an autoclave of teeth initially stored in saline and formalin also had negative effects in contrast to only formalin storage [37]. Dry specimen storage following rehydration (in distilled water 2 weeks prior to use) is also a possibility for in vitro studies, although it was not usable in this case since it has a negative side effect of crack formation through the dry enamel and occasionally separation of enamel from dentine [38]. In the current study, to avoid the possibility of drying, all teeth were kept in separate containers in alginate gel and only removed during preparations, scanning, and cementation, as well as the thermocycling process, since it is recommended to keep specimens hydrated during the entire experimental process. Additionally, post-extraction time did not exceed 6 months, as recommended for in vitro testing [39]. Alginate gel-filled containers were used to fix specimens in sample holders during micro-CT scanning to avoid artifacts caused by specimen movements. Alginate gel has great potential as a biomaterial for various biomedical applications as it is easy to use, biocompatible, allows the maintenance of a physiologically moist environment, and can be simply modified to prepare alginate derivatives with new properties [40]. It was chosen as the appropriate media for the study also due to the fact that it is radiolucent, and thus not interfering with the scanning process.
Thermocycling was used to simulate aging of dental materials. The aging process influences resin cement, and therefore can affect the color of porcelain veneers [41] and their marginal adaptation, since it is known that the dissolution of composite resin matrix happens in oral liquids [42,43,44]. For in vitro studies to artificially age dental materials, different methods, for example, water storage or thermocycling, are used. Thermocycling between 5 and 55 °C simulates the effect of varying temperatures present in the oral cavity due to hot and cold foods and drinks [45,46]. Although most authors are in agreement about the temperatures, there is a great diversity of opinions regarding the number of cycles. In the current study, thermocycling was performed for 5000 cycles, with temperatures between 5 and 55 °C. In other studies, suggested duration of thermal cycling varies, starting at 100 cycles [47] to 3000 and more [48,49,50], and reaching up to 100,000 cycles [51]. However, beyond 5000 cycles the flexural strength of the composite materials hardly changed [52]. According to the International Association for Standardization (International Standards Organization, 1994. Guidance on Testing of Adhesion to Tooth Structure. ISO/TR 11405, Dental Materials), a protocol of 500 cycles is appropriate in simulating the aging of biomaterials.
There is no consensus about the number of thermal cycles corresponding to usage time in vivo, and suggestions for a specific number of cycles are not based on researched data. Although thermal cycling is one of the most widely used testing methods for dental materials, there is a lack of a standardized protocol, which makes it hard to compare the study results [53]. In the context of material aging, it should be noted that a major limitation of in vitro studies is not taking into account additional factors influencing individual treatment outcomes, such as oral pH value, composition of saliva, and food and oral hygiene regimens, which vary from patient to patient.
The micro-CT method can be successfully applied to investigate mineralized tissues, such as teeth and bone, and different materials, such as ceramics and polymers. It was used as a method of choice in the present study. Although micro-CT has been widely used in dentistry to study various topics in endodontics and orthodontics, there is a limited number of studies regarding prosthodontic questions. Only a few authors have used micro-CT to investigate topics such as biomechanics of different veneer preparation designs [54], cement thickness and stress distribution in ceramic crowns [55], and cement layer around root canal posts [56,57,58]. Interfacial gap has been studied using micro-CT in regard to class II cavities [59] and in a few studies regarding marginal gap and cement layer specifically around veneers [60,61,62]. The micro-CT method is easy to use and gives a good insight into material structure, behavior, and precision, as well as defects. Therefore, it is a good fit for analyzing prosthetic restorations, which often include combinations of multiple material layers. It is debatable though if all the defects visible in a micro-CT scan are relevant clinically since our specimens showed no correlation between the number of defects and intensity of discoloration. Another limitation is possible measurement errors. In the current study, scanning was conducted in an interval, starting 2 mm from the tip of the cusp for all teeth to exclude any anatomical differences. Although all micro-CT scans were undertaken in a similar manner, minor shifts in scanned segments cannot be excluded, which could lead to some degree of measurement errors when comparing scans before and after thermocycling. To minimize the possibility of measurement mistakes, all micro-CT measurements and microscopic evaluation were performed by one calibrated operator. However, it has to be noted that the evaluation of defects and discoloration is subjective.
One of the limitations is not considering possible differences in marginal and cervical regions of the veneer, since all scanned segments were located in the middle portion of a tooth. A small percentage of veneers show immaculate margin adaptation [63]; and, although veneer manufacturing techniques have evolved, in recent studies it is shown that cervical portion can still be more challenging in terms of adaptation [64]. It also has to be noted that polishing instruments work well on flat, easily accessible surfaces. However, it is complicated to ensure the same quality around interproximal areas and gingival margin [1]. The microleakage at the cervical tooth–composite interface is also shown to be higher in comparison to the incisal interface [16].

5. Conclusions

Removing unpolymerized cement with a brush caused more defects in the cement layer when compared to tack-curing and removing excess cement with a probe. Cement removal with a brush before light curing showed less discoloration after thermocycling. The type of defect did not have a correlation with discoloration.
Further research is required to understand the connection between the type of defect and depth of discoloration in order to determine the best cement removal method for improving cementation quality for porcelain laminate veneers

Author Contributions

M.G.: investigation, writing—original draft preparation, data curation, visualization; E.P.: methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision; V.Z.: conceptualization, methodology, resources; J.L.: conceptualization, methodology, resources; U.S.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the European Regional Development Fund within the Activity 1.1.1.2 “Post-doctoral Research Aid” of the Specific Aid Objective 1.1.1 “To increase the research and innovative capacity of scientific institutions of Latvia and the ability to attract external financing, investing in human resources and infrastructure” of the Operational Program “Growth and Employment” (No.1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/459).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the local Research and Ethics committee of Riga Stradins university (permit number: 6-3/5/46, date: 15 May 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, M. Gaile, upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peumans, M.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Lambrechts, P.; Vanherle, G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J. Dent. 2000, 28, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morimoto, S.; Albanesi, R.B.; Sesma, N.; Agra, C.M.; Braga, M.M. Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2016, 29, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alenezi, A.; Alsweed, M.; Alsidrani, S.; Chrcanovic, B.R. Long-Term Survival and Complication Rates of Porcelain Laminate Veneers in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Addison, O.; Marquis, P.M.; Fleming, G.J.P. Adhesive luting of all-ceramic restorations—The impact of cementation variables and short-term water storage on the strength of a feldspathic dental ceramic. J. Adhes. Dent. 2008, 10, 285–293. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stangel, I.; Nathanson, D.; Hsu, C.S. Shear Strength of the Composite Bond to Etched Porcelain. J. Dent. Res. 1987, 66, 1460–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kursoglu, P.; Motro, P.F.K.; Yurdaguven, H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2013, 5, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Valian, A.; Moravej-Salehi, E. Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: Scanning electron microscopy analysis. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2014, 6, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Aida, M.; Hayakawa, T.; Mizukawa, K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1995, 73, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blatz, M.B.; Sadan, A.; Kern, M. Resin-ceramic bonding: A review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003, 89, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tay, W.M.; Lynch, E.; Auger, D. Effects of some finishing techniques on cervical margins of porcelain laminates. Quintessence Int. 1987, 18, 599–602. [Google Scholar]
  11. Calamia, J.R.; Calamia, C.S. Porcelain Laminate Veneers: Reasons for 25 Years of Success. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 51, 399–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stegall, D.; Tantbirojn, D.; Perdigão, J.; Versluis, A. Does Tack Curing Luting Cements Affect the Final Cure? J. Adhes. Dent. 2017, 19, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hamlett, K. The art of veneer cementation. Alpha Omegan 2009, 102, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. IPS e.max CAD Instructions for Use. Available online: https://downloadcenter.ivoclarvivadent.com/#search-info-211=279006%2C1&details=13022 (accessed on 4 December 2021).
  15. Panavia V5 Instructions for Use. Available online: https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/panavia-v5-ifu.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2021).
  16. Haralur, S.B. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented with different bonding techniques. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2018, 10, 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aldhafyan, M.; Silikas, N.; Watts, D.C. Influence of curing modes on conversion and shrinkage of dual-cure resin-cements. Dent. Mater. 2021, 38, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Braga, R.R.; Ferracane, J.L.; Condon, J.R. Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays. J. Dent. 2002, 30, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Suh, B.I.; Gleave, C.; Choi, W.J.; Hyun, J.; Nam, J. Effects of light-, self-, and tack-curing on degree of conversion and physical strength of dual-cure resin cements. Am. J. Dent. 2016, 29, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. De Souza, G.; Braga, R.R.; Cesar, P.F.; Lopes, G.C. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: A literature review. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2015, 23, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Magalhães, A.P.R.; Cardoso, P.d.C.; de Souza, J.B.; Fonseca, R.B.; Pires-de-Souza, F.d.C.P.; Lopez, L.G. Influence of Activation Mode of Resin Cement on the Shade of Porcelain Veneers: Influence of Cement Activation Mode on the Color of Veneers. J. Prosthodont. 2014, 23, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marchionatti, A.M.E.; Wandscher, V.F.; May, M.M.; Bottino, M.A.; May, L.G. Color stability of ceramic laminate veneers cemented with light-polymerizing and dual-polymerizing luting agent: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017, 118, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kilinc, E.; Antonson, S.A.; Hardigan, P.C.; Kesercioglu, A. Resin cement color stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J. Dent. 2011, 39 (Suppl. 1), e30–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hayashi, M. Adhesive Dentistry: Understanding the Science and Achieving Clinical Success. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 64, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tabatabaei, M.H.; Matinfard, F.; Ahmadi, E.; Ranjbar Omrani, L.; Sadeghi Mahounak, F. Color Stability of Ceramic Veneers Cemented with Self-Adhesive Cements after Accelerated Aging. Front. Dent. 2019, 16, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ibarra, G.; Johnson, G.H.; Geurtsen, W.; Vargas, M.A. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sinjari, B.; Santilli, M.; D’Addazio, G.; Rexhepi, I.; Gigante, A.; Caputi, S.; Traini, T. Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study. Materials 2020, 13, 3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rohr, N.; Fischer, J. Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2017, 9, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Straface, A.; Rupp, L.; Gintaute, A.; Fischer, J.; Zitzmann, N.U.; Rohr, N. HF etching of CAD/CAM materials: Influence of HF concentration and etching time on shear bond strength. Head Face Med. 2019, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Małysa, A.; Weżgowiec, J.; Danel, D.; Boening, K.; Walczak, K.; Więckiewicz, M. Bond strength of modern self-adhesive resin cements to human dentin and different CAD/CAM ceramics. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2020, 22, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ghajghouj, O.; Taşar-Faruk, S. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various Resin Cements. Materials 2019, 12, 2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Aboushelib, M.N.; Elmahy, W.A.; Ghazy, M.H. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yuce, M.; Ulusoy, M.; Turk, A.G. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Heat-Pressed and CAD/CAM Porcelain Laminate Veneers and a 2-Year Follow-up. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qahtani, W.M.S.A.L. Assessment of Marginal Opening for Different Cementation Techniques for Heat-Pressed Ceramic Veneers. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2020, 23, 1643–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chieffi, N.; Chersoni, S.; Papacchini, F.; Vano, M.; Goracci, C.; Davidson, C.L.; Tay, F.R.; Ferrari, M. The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent. Mater. 2006, 23, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Harasani, M.H.; Isidor, F.; Kaaber, S. Marginal fit of porcelain and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vitro conditions. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1991, 99, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, J.J.; Nettey-Marbell, A.; Cook, A., Jr.; Pimenta, L.A.; Leonard, R.; Ritter, A.V. Using extracted teeth for research: The effect of storage medium and sterilization on dentin bond strengths. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2007, 138, 1599–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mobarak, E.H.; El-Badrawy, W.; Pashley, D.H.; Jamjoom, H. Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2010, 104, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Armstrong, S.; Breschi, L.; Özcan, M.; Pfefferkorn, F.; Ferrari, M.; Van Meerbeek, B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, K.Y.; Mooney, D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 106–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Turgut, S.; Bagis, B. Colour stability of laminate veneers: An in vitro study. J. Dent. 2011, 39, e57–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. McKinney, J.E.; Wu, W. Chemical Softening and Wear of Dental Composites. J. Dent. Res. 1985, 64, 1326–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roulet, J.-F.; Wälti, C. Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1984, 52, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vrijhoef, M.M.A.; Hendriks, F.H.J.; Letzel, H. Loss of substance of dental composite restorations. Dent. Mater. 1985, 1, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barclay, C.W.; Spence, D.; Laird, W.R.E. Intra-oral temperatures during function. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ernst, C.-P.; Canbek, K.; Euler, T.; Willershausen, B. In vivo validation of the historical in vitro thermocycling temperature range for dental materials testing. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2004, 8, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mathew, M.; Parameswaran Nair, E.K.; Krishnan, V.K. Bonding agent is a decisive factor in determining the marginal leakage of dental composites subjected to thermal cycling: An in vitro study. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001, 28, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hahnel, S.; Henrich, A.; Bürgers, R.; Handel, G.; Rosentritt, M. Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper. Dent. 2010, 35, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Assunção, W.G.; Gomes, E.A.; Barão, V.A.; Barbosa, D.B.; Delben, J.A.; Tabata, L.F. Effect of storage in artificial saliva and thermal cycling on Knoop hardness of resin denture teeth. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2010, 54, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Weir, M.D.; Moreau, J.L.; Levine, E.D.; Strassler, H.E.; Chow, L.C.; Xu, H.H. Nanocomposite containing CaF(2) nanoparticles: Thermal cycling, wear and long-term water-aging. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Moreau, J.L.; Weir, M.D.; Giuseppetti, A.A.; Chow, L.C.; Antonucci, J.M.; Xu, H.H.K. Long-term mechanical durability of dental nanocomposites containing amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2012, 100, 1264–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kawano, F.; Ohguri, T.; Ichikawa, T.; Matsumoto, N. Influence of thermal cycles in water on flexural strength of laboratory-processed composite resin. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001, 28, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Morresi, A.L.; D’Amario, M.; Capogreco, M.; Gatto, R.; Marzo, G.; D’Arcangelo, C.; Monaco, A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 29, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Celebi, A.T.; Icer, E.; Eren, M.M.; Baykasoglu, C.; Mugan, A.; Yildiz, E. Thermal-stress analysis of ceramic laminate veneer restorations with different incisal preparations using micro-computed tomography-based 3D finite element models. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 75, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, B.; Lu, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Arola, D.; Zhang, D. The Effects of Adhesive Type and Thickness on Stress Distribution in Molars Restored with All-Ceramic Crowns. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 20, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chang, Y.-H.; Wang, H.-W.; Lin, P.-H.; Lin, C.-L. Evaluation of early resin luting cement damage induced by voids around a circular fiber post in a root canal treated premolar by integrating micro-CT, finite element analysis and fatigue testing. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 1082–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Uzun, I.; Keleş, A.; Arslan, H.; Güler, B.; Keskin, C.; Gündüz, K. Influence of oval and circular post placement using different resin cements on push-out bond strength and void volume analysed by micro-CT. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chang, Y.-H.; Lee, H.; Lin, C.-L. Early resin luting material damage around a circular fiber post in a root canal treated premolar by using micro-computerized tomographic and finite element sub-modeling analyses. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2015, 51, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Scotti, N.; Baldi, A.; Vergano, E.A.; Tempesta, R.M.; Alovisi, M.; Pasqualini, D.; Carpegna, G.C.; Comba, A. Tridimensional Evaluation of the Interfacial Gap in Deep Cervical Margin Restorations: A Micro-CT Study. Oper. Dent. 2020, 45, E227–E236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hsu, P.; Ramos, V.; Sadr, A. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement shrinkage under zirconia versus lithium disilicate veneers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Măroiu, A.C.; Sinescu, C.; Duma, V.F.; Topală, F.; Jivănescu, A.; Popovici, P.M.; Tudor, A.; Romînu, M. Micro-CT and Microscopy Study of Internal and Marginal Gap to Tooth Surface of Crenelated versus Conventional Dental Indirect Veneers. Medicina 2021, 57, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sampaio, C.S.; Niemann, K.D.; Schweitzer, D.D.; Hirata, R.; Atria, P.J. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2021, 33, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Coyne, B.M.; Wilson, N.H. A clinical evaluation of the marginal adaptation of porcelain laminate veneers. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor Dent 1994, 3, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Pereira, D.D.; Marquezan, M.; Grossi, M.L.; Silva Oshima, H.M. Analysis of Marginal Adaptation of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Produced by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Technology: A Preliminary In Vitro Study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 31, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dentistry 10 00055 g001 550
Figure 1. Teeth preparation steps: (a) preparation outline marked on the tooth surface; (b) tooth after preparation.
Figure 1. Teeth preparation steps: (a) preparation outline marked on the tooth surface; (b) tooth after preparation.
Dentistry 10 00055 g001
Dentistry 10 00055 g002 550
Figure 2. Veneer fabrication: (a) teeth fixed in putty silicone bases to ensure better control during scanning and cementation; (b) design of the veneers with the margin line marked (green line).
Figure 2. Veneer fabrication: (a) teeth fixed in putty silicone bases to ensure better control during scanning and cementation; (b) design of the veneers with the margin line marked (green line).
Dentistry 10 00055 g002
Dentistry 10 00055 g003 550
Figure 3. The study groups with the cementation and two different cement removal techniques.
Figure 3. The study groups with the cementation and two different cement removal techniques.
Dentistry 10 00055 g003
Dentistry 10 00055 g004 550
Figure 4. Process of setting the intervals for scanning: (a) positioning of the specimen and measurements; (b) segments chosen for micro-CT scanning.
Figure 4. Process of setting the intervals for scanning: (a) positioning of the specimen and measurements; (b) segments chosen for micro-CT scanning.
Dentistry 10 00055 g004
Dentistry 10 00055 g005 550
Figure 5. Data collection steps. TC = thermocycling.
Figure 5. Data collection steps. TC = thermocycling.
Dentistry 10 00055 g005
Dentistry 10 00055 g006 550
Figure 6. Specimen preparation and coloring: (a) teeth were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After coloring, teeth were rinsed thoroughly under running water and polished with a polishing brush to remove the dye on the surface; (b) each specimen was sectioned at the center in facio-lingual direction with a 0.5 mm low speed diamond disk.
Figure 6. Specimen preparation and coloring: (a) teeth were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After coloring, teeth were rinsed thoroughly under running water and polished with a polishing brush to remove the dye on the surface; (b) each specimen was sectioned at the center in facio-lingual direction with a 0.5 mm low speed diamond disk.
Dentistry 10 00055 g006
Dentistry 10 00055 g007 550
Figure 7. Stereo microphotography showing different discoloration intensities: (a) slight cement layer discoloration, 20× magnification; (b) extensive cement layer discoloration, 20× magnification.
Figure 7. Stereo microphotography showing different discoloration intensities: (a) slight cement layer discoloration, 20× magnification; (b) extensive cement layer discoloration, 20× magnification.
Dentistry 10 00055 g007
Dentistry 10 00055 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparison of structural cement layer defects between groups before and after thermocycling.
Figure 8. Comparison of structural cement layer defects between groups before and after thermocycling.
Dentistry 10 00055 g008
Dentistry 10 00055 g009 550
Figure 9. Sample number 13 before and after thermocycling: (a) small defects and cement layer overfill before thermocycling; (b) after thermocycling, defects adjacent to enamel and veneer are visible.
Figure 9. Sample number 13 before and after thermocycling: (a) small defects and cement layer overfill before thermocycling; (b) after thermocycling, defects adjacent to enamel and veneer are visible.
Dentistry 10 00055 g009
Dentistry 10 00055 g010 550
Figure 10. Comparison of discoloration presence between two groups.
Figure 10. Comparison of discoloration presence between two groups.
Dentistry 10 00055 g010
Table
Table 1. Parameters used for scanning.
Table 1. Parameters used for scanning.
Energy90 kVp
Intensity66 µA
FilterAl 0.5 mm
ResolutionHigh
Voxel size7.4 µm
Integration time1000 ms
Data Average3
Table
Table 2. Localization and character of defects in two groups before and after thermocycling.
Table 2. Localization and character of defects in two groups before and after thermocycling.
Type of DefectPROBEBRUSH
Before TCAfter TCp ValueBefore TCAfter TCp Value
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Overall count4.71.8311.15.990.01238.54.2210.73.890.0453
In cement layer3.72.216.73.830.01516.93.486.52.370.8768
Next to tooth0.70.822.81.620.01670.70.821.71.570.0165
Next to veneer0.30.951.61.840.08920.91.372.51.510.0327
Underfill112.9174.799986.220.6080210.6159.31150.1175.750.1610
Wide overfill201.9170.55150.7129.290.047455.979.2955.278.990.1579
Irrelevant overfill373.8110.06299.2103.890.0469389.4185.06314.3176.150.0050
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gaile, M.; Papia, E.; Zalite, V.; Locs, J.; Soboleva, U. Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055

AMA Style

Gaile M, Papia E, Zalite V, Locs J, Soboleva U. Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10(4):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gaile, Mara, Evaggelia Papia, Vita Zalite, Janis Locs, and Una Soboleva. 2022. "Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy" Dentistry Journal 10, no. 4: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055

APA Style

Gaile, M., Papia, E., Zalite, V., Locs, J., & Soboleva, U. (2022). Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy. Dentistry Journal, 10(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop