Next Article in Journal
Mixtures of Sodium Iso-Butyl Xanthate and Sodium Di-Ethyl Dithiophosphate on the Flotation of a Cu-Ni-PGM Ore in Ca(NO3)2 and NaNO3 
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Hydroponic Systems for Medicinal Herb Cultivation: Practices and Prospects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Proceedings
Volume 104
Issue 1
10.3390/proceedings2024104041
proceedings-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review

by
Giovanna Marrazza
1,* and
Sara Tombelli
2
1
Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
2
Institute of Applied Physics “Nello Carrara”, CNR-IFAC, 50019 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proceedings 2024, 104(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104041
Published: 10 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference abstracts to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: Sciforum
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 162
  • Number of submissions accepted: 116
  • Number of submissions published: 40
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 71.6%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 41
  • Any additional information on the review process is provided below.
  • Peer-review process and regulations: The review process was conducted in a single-blind manner, with the entire procedure administered through the MDPI Conference platform, Sciforum. Evaluations were performed by reviewers from various universities and countries. Based on their feedback, revisions were made to each article, encompassing thorough examinations of the structure, content and writing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marrazza, G.; Tombelli, S. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2024, 104, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104041

AMA Style

Marrazza G, Tombelli S. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2024; 104(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marrazza, Giovanna, and Sara Tombelli. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 104, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104041

APA Style

Marrazza, G., & Tombelli, S. (2024). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 104(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop