Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Reuse of Religious and Sacred Heritage: Preserving Material Traces and Spirit of Place
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prehistoric Recycling Explained in a Playful Way: The Pfahlbauten Wimmelbild—An Interactive Digital Mediation Tool Designed by Young People
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Terminological Study for Scientific Hypothetical 3D Reconstruction

by
Federico Fallavollita
1,*,
Riccardo Foschi
1,*,
Fabrizio Ivan Apollonio
1 and
Irene Cazzaro
1,2
1
Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
2
Iuav di Venezia, 30135 Venezia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2024, 7(9), 4755-4767; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090225 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 July 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 29 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary findings from the ongoing Erasmus+ European project CoVHer, which focuses on the hypothetical virtual reconstructions of lost or unbuilt architecture. This contribution provides a critical assessment of the terminology specific to this field. A significant challenge lies in the absence of standardised terminology for many foundational aspects, which can lead to misconceptions and misunderstandings. The research begins with a comprehensive review of the relevant literature in the field, aiming to identify which terms are most widely accepted and appropriate to use and which are ambiguous or should be avoided. For concepts that lack a clear definition, new terminology is proposed. This paper analyses six key terms: reconstruction, uncertainty, raw model, informative model, digital representation methods, and 3D modelling techniques.
Keywords: standardization; uncertainty; raw model; informative model; digital representation methods; 3D modelling techniques; definitions standardization; uncertainty; raw model; informative model; digital representation methods; 3D modelling techniques; definitions

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fallavollita, F.; Foschi, R.; Apollonio, F.I.; Cazzaro, I. Terminological Study for Scientific Hypothetical 3D Reconstruction. Heritage 2024, 7, 4755-4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090225

AMA Style

Fallavollita F, Foschi R, Apollonio FI, Cazzaro I. Terminological Study for Scientific Hypothetical 3D Reconstruction. Heritage. 2024; 7(9):4755-4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fallavollita, Federico, Riccardo Foschi, Fabrizio Ivan Apollonio, and Irene Cazzaro. 2024. "Terminological Study for Scientific Hypothetical 3D Reconstruction" Heritage 7, no. 9: 4755-4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090225

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop