1. Introduction
Digital twins are the digital replicas of physical systems, either living or not. Digital twins’ adoption is becoming more popular in many fields. Industries such as manufacturing [
1], automotive [
2], and energy [
3] sectors are using digital twins for their ability to address multidisciplinary problems. Some include interweaving solutions of complex systems analysis, decision support, and technology integration. Digital twins have gained popularity with the help of Internet of Things technologies, as they allow for high spatial resolution monitoring of the physical twins, practically in real-time, by using microdevices and remote sensing to provide ongoing data transmission. Digital twins enable continuous information transmission through the system’s lifecycle [
4]. Digital twins can simulate system development and validation [
5], and prevent system failures and undesired system states [
6] due to their ability to successfully converge physical and virtual spaces [
7].
The concept of digital twins as a way to merge virtual and physical assets in product lifecycle management was conceived first by M. Grieves [
8]. Since the introduction of the concept by Grieves, many fields have adopted digital twins. As there is no widely accepted definition, each sector has its own definition of digital twins. Our study will use the Clark et al. definition: “A dynamic virtual representation of a physical object or system, usually across multiple stages of its lifecycle, that uses real-world data, simulation, or machine learning models combined with data analysis to enable understanding, learning, and reasoning. Digital twins can be used to answer what-if questions and should be able to present insights in an intuitive way” [
9].
Multiple sectors, companies, and organizations have adopted digital twins, some of which include Siemens [
10], General Electric, NASA, the United States Air Force [
11], Oracle, ANSYS, SAP, and Altair [
12]. In addition to the adoption of digital twins by these leading companies, the increased availability of commercial software tools with which to develop digital twins, such as Predix1 and Simcenter 3d2 [
10], is compelling evidence of industries’ increased interest in digital twin applications. Industries that adopt digital twin applications will see numerous benefits, such as reduced production times and cost, hidden complexity of integrating heterogeneous technologies, safer working environments, and more environmentally sustainable operations.
Questions arise regarding the benefits of digital twins for dental institutions’ remote learning, the characteristics that differentiate them from currently remote education practices, and their design and implementation. Presently, artificial intelligence technology [
13], big data [
14], and the Internet of Things [
15] are starting to converge in digital twin applications, and the benefits of this convergence are evident in disciplines that have adopted digital twin applications. Examples are visible in the agricultural production systems [
16], which leverage information and communication technologies to design and implement the next generation of data, models, and decision support tools. Although there are numerous benefits of digital twin adoption which can be seen in the industries and disciplines currently using them, digital twin usage by dental institutions for remote learning is limited. The added value of digital twins in remote dental education needs more discussion.
This paper investigates the potential added value of digital twins’ adoption by dental institutions for remote learning. To obtain this information, we first research how widely adopted digital twins are by the dental industry and the dental institutions, then investigate their reported benefits. Next, we will examine similarities between digital twin adoption in dentistry and other fields to identify opportunities of potential added value for dentistry. Our research questions are listed below.
We utilized a mixed-method approach to answer our questions. As initial investigative research suggested, digital twin usage in dentistry for remote learning is limited. Thus, a literature review alone would not be adequate due to the limited number of reported cases in the literature. Our approach consisted of a literature review of existing digital twins in dentistry, and a survey of case studies in other disciplines, to compare digital twin adoption levels in dentistry and explore potential future uses. We reviewed digital twin use cases in dentistry, and use cases in other disciplines, to determine how each case implements digital twins. Our aim was not to identify specific digital twin applications. Instead, we focused on generalizing them into abstract, representative use cases. With the chosen use cases, we investigated the levels of maturity, service types, and benefits offered. Our methodology is reported below; the results and challenges are presented in the following (
Section 4). We also discuss our results related to the present state of digital twins’ adoption in dentistry and other industries (
Section 5) and the added value of digital twins, present a portable teaching–learning platform for remote education called DenTeach (
Section 6) that uses digital twins technology, and present potential areas for future research (
Section 7). The final section (
Section 8) concludes our work with our proposed roadmap for digital twins’ adoption in remote dental education.
The need for remote education has increased since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic. To reduce transmissions, social distancing and preventative measures saw global implementation. Workplaces were mandated to limit the number of employees in the office and to have employees work remotely. The same policies also applied to schools and universities. These implementations resulted in the shutdown of in-person classes, and educational institutes scrambled to adhere to the new government policies and still provide education for students. In the initial months of the shutdown, it was evident that the education system did not fully prepare for a remote teaching and learning system. García-Morale et al. noted the transition to virtual classes will have significant implications for the entire learning process. To transition from in-person to remote learning, educational institutes need to modify methods for assessing learning outcomes and reassessing the skills and competencies required of students [
17]. In the case of dental education institutes, it was evident that not all classroom material would be immediately transferable to remote teaching, as many of the courses require students to get hands-on. This change was challenging for instructors and students who were required to self-isolate at home without access to dental equipment [
18]. Surgical procedures and equipment handling are necessary components that allow students to develop the hands-on experience and skills required for patient safety and comfort [
19]. Dental institutes need a solution for students to continue learning and practicing hands-on skills if in-class lectures and laboratories are not feasible.
We note that during the start of our research, the pandemic restrictions were still fully implemented. While in the final stages of publishing this paper, the pandemic restrictions have lessened, and in-class lectures have returned. Institutions continue to use remote learning as part of their curriculum, since remote education has many benefits, such as increased class size, lower costs, and increased accessibility. Institutions should have the option of continuing a remote educational curriculum. For these potential benefits, we continued our research on digital twin adoption in the field of dentistry for remote learning. We hope this paper can inspire interest and further research on digital twin adoption in dentistry, since there is limited research in this area. With the increased visibility of the benefits of digital twins, there will be more interest in developing and improving dental digital twins for remote learning. Our paper is the first study to present a roadmap for digital twins’ adoption in remote dental education. The proposed roadmap can also be modified to apply to other areas of dentistry. We also present a solution to remote dental education in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, and although the pandemic has mostly ended, COVID-19 will not be the last pandemic. We are now more adept at pandemic life, and our paper will provide a solution for remote dental education in the face of a new pandemic.
2. Methodology
To answer the second research question—“What is a potential application-based roadmap for digital twins’ adoption in remote dental education?”—we first searched for peer-reviewed review papers on digital twin applications. Then we reviewed the use cases, the reported benefits they offered, the industries, and the levels of adoption. We list the results of the digital twin application in each case and its benefits. Next, we proposed potential application areas in dentistry and identified potential benefits based on the use cases in other disciplines. Below we summarize our different research stages.
Research Stages
The research was separated into three sections: (i) literature search; (ii) paper selection; (iii) content analysis.
In the beginning, we started with a literature search to find information on our research topic. We used online journal databases and Google Scholar to search for peer-reviewed articles that included the terms “digital twins”, “digital twins remote education”, “digital twins application”, ”digital twins health care”, “dental digital twins” and “dental digital twins remote education”. We reviewed all papers that included these terms and selected ones that defined the concept of digital twins, and discussed the use and application of digital twins in areas of health care, remote education, dental education, dentistry, urban planning, and agriculture. We chose a diverse range of industries to compare findings. Finally, after reviewing the selected papers, we gathered the findings, and using the findings we present a roadmap for digital twin application in remote education. Below we summarize the process of each research stage.
- (i)
Literature Search
Using Google Scholar to search for the terms: “digital twins”, “digital twins remote education”, “digital twins application”, “digital twins health care”, “dental digital twins” and “dental digital twins remote education”.
- (ii)
Papers Selection
Selecting papers that defined the concept and reviewing papers that included these terms.
Selecting papers that discuss the use and application of digital twins in these areas: health care, remote education, dental education, dentistry, and other industries, such as urban planning and agriculture, for comparison.
- (iii)
Content Analysis
Reviewing the selected papers and reporting the findings, i.e., benefits, level of adoption, and challenges.
Using the findings to present a roadmap of digital twins’ applications in remote education.
Figure 1 is a visualization of the steps to answer our second research question on a potential roadmap for digital twins’ adoption in remote dental education.
We propose the roadmap below for the application of digital twins in dental education.
Target area to increase the awareness of digital twins. i.e., remote education.
Demonstrate benefits of digital twin application in remote dental education.
Increase interest and further research into digital twin applications.
Research begins for digital twin application in dentistry.
Develop digital twins for dental education and begin implementation of usage.
These steps are presented again in the Conclusions section.
3. Digital Twins: History
Digital twins are used mainly in advanced manufacturing and product lifecycle management [
20]. Fuller et al. noted in their research that the number of papers on manufacturing is vastly higher than research on digital twins for smart cities and healthcare, highlighting gaps in these research areas [
21].
The manufacturing industries use digital twins to improve uptime, worker safety, and high-efficiency activities [
22]. The product lifecycle uses digital twins for product design, production line design, and production process optimization. Many businesses use digital twins to increase product performance because they allow companies to control their production processes, detect failures, and thus produce more efficient products [
22].
Although digital twins’ usage is mainly in manufacturing, we expect to see more digital twins for healthcare and smart cities. In the future, we can expect to see digital twins being used with 3D printing to create body parts to treat soldiers on the battlefield [
22]. The United States’ military also has plans to develop virtual copies of their soldiers [
22]. The demand for digital twins in many industries, such as healthcare, has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic.
What is the future of digital twins, and what challenges will arise? This paper will discuss how digital twins can be a solution to remote learning in dentistry. We will call attention to a specific platform called DenTeach that uses digital twin technology and how it can facilitate remote learning. We will also review the different applications of digital twin technology in health and non-health fields.
6. DenTeach: A Viable Example of Implementation of Digital Twins in Dentistry
As illustrated in
Figure 2, there are two types of DenTeach workstations available [
43]: the instructor workstation (left) and the student workstation (right). The instructor workstation consists of a DT-Rightway dental articulator [
43], a sensory system, four 360-degree view cameras, a microphone for live communication, and software that displays students’ information and performance. The student workstation consists of a DT-Rightway dental articulator, a sensory system, two sets of RealFeel dental handpieces, and software that stores students’ performance and provides KPIs. The workstation monitor displays a 3D model superimposed on the student RealFeel drill.
A list of KPIs is shown in
Figure 3. The KPIs are calculated to assess the tool handling angulation, the smoothness and steadiness of the student’s hand motion, and the amount of the haptic sensation generated during the performance of each dental task.
Results from studies on virtual educational systems and dental simulators in remote educational settings are positive [
18]. Students report using the virtual practice systems and dental simulators as positive experiences and had visible improvements in their practical skills. However, many of these simulators are not widely used due to costs and portability issues. We believe DenTeach could be a more suitable option for remote learning than other existing methods.
6.1. DenTeach Physical Setup
DenTeach complements the traditional instructor and student working area by integrating itself into the existing working setup (which consists of a tabletop, dental unit, and dental instruments).
6.1.1. Instructor Workstation
The instructor work area shown in
Figure 1-left is the DenTeach platform integrated with a standard instructor work area and dental unit. This workstation consists of the DT-Performer, DT-Rightway Articulator, DT-RealFeel Sensors, and four mini cameras. The DT-Performer features a full classroom view, a selectable student profile, and a performance index. The sensors are wirelessly attached to the standard dental drills, which can measure and collect quantitative performance data. Each sensor is state-of-the-art technology that records and streams the instructor’s hand motion data to the cloud (recorded data are then imported live to each student’s workstation). DT-Performer interprets data in real-time and provides advanced statistical data analysis to rate the student’s performance as a quantitative value. During each test, there is measurement of the orientation data and dynamic information. The information that is analyzed includes roll (axial), pitch (back-to-front), and yaw (side-to-side) angles, linear accelerations (3 DOFs), angular accelerations (3 DOFs), angular velocity (3 DOFs), jerk components (3 DOFs), and several KPIs.
In summary, the main components of the instructor workstation are listed below.
DT-Instructor: the platform contains all components and 4 HD cameras to provide different views (see
Figure 4) of the instructor station.
DT-Performer: software that provides a classroom view, selectable student profiles, interprets data in real-time, and displays students’ performances.
DT-Rightway Articulator: a custom-designed system that supports upper and lower typodonts.
DT-RealFeel Sensors: measure quantitative performance data.
6.1.2. Student Workstation
Figure 2-right shows the student’s work area. This workstation consists of the DT-Student, a fully integrated system with two typodonts affixed to the DT-Rightway Articulator, a student’s DT-RealFeel Handpiece to synchronize the instructor’s movements while in teaching mode, and DT-Student software to allow recording and playing of lesson videos. Lesson videos are demonstrated with psychomotor performance metrics to measure effort, speed, accuracy, and learning curve. In addition, the system also has four selectable instructor videos. In each video, the student’s drill model is superimposed over the instructor’s drill to enable effective imitation. The custom-designed DT-RealFeel Handpiece has a handle grip with a built-in actuation system to generate a vibrotactile feeling, a set of sensory systems, and a data communication system. Excess force triggers the built-in vibrator to send an abrupt jolt to the hand. The workstation processing unit calculates several performance indices, and each index uses one or more operating characteristics detected by the sensory system within the DT-RealFeel Handpiece. The instructor’s DT-Performer also uses its data to measure similar performance indices.
In summary, the main components of the student workstation are listed below.
DT-Student: the central platform contains all elements of the student station.
DT-RealFeel Handpiece: a drill with sensors in the handle, which can generate a vibrotactile feeling and act as an alarm to notify students.
DT-Student software: allows for the viewing and recording of instructor videos and displays students’ performance metrics, allowing students to view their learning progress.
An augmented reality feature superimposes on the instructor’s video shown in
Figure 5 (digital twins concept).
Four mini cameras on the instructor’s workstation show the top view, two side views, and inside view of the DT-Rightway Articulator, and the instructor’s hand position during teaching procedures. They can also record and simultaneously transmit onto the students’ workstations. In addition, the instructor can select, record, and play over 30 psychomotor performance metrics using the DT-Performer software, so the instructor can objectively measure effort, speed, accuracy, and learning curve.
6.1.3. PrepScanner Unit
PrepScanner is an automated measurement system for providing the measurements of a tooth for use by a dental instructor or a dental student to assess dental performance (
Figure 6). The PrepScanner is used at a student or instructor’s workstation as a standalone platform or in combination with a DenTeach’s DT-Student or DT-Instructor workstation [
44]. PrepScanner has an application that shows measurements and dimensions and statistical and graphical information on the dental performance of the student during a dental procedure. The PrepScanner provides high-accuracy preparation measurement by giving students access to a high-quality preparation grader which employs robotics and laser technology. Access is available regardless of time or location. In addition, students can use this virtual tutor for self-assessment of dental preparations and receive quantitative feedback and a comprehensive report immediately on measurements of a dental preparation (
Figure 7), with accuracy as high as 20 microns.
6.1.4. DenTeach: Digital Twin Technology
DenTeach uses the digital twin concept to teach students the correct hand position during teaching procedures. The platform includes the DenTeach Digital Twins API designed for DenTeach Library (see
Figure 8), dashboards for both student and instructor workstations, data analysis/analytics implemented in DenTeach Library, and the simulation environment in the shadowing model of the student software.
Figure 5 shows the augmented reality concept of the digital twins used in DenTeach. IMU sensors on the handpiece record and transfer information from the student’s hand movement and display it on the screen as a superimposed 3D model, i.e., augmented reality. The students can understand the concept of the course by combining both physical and virtual presentations of the tooth and dental instruments. The physical twin is the student’s hand drill, and the virtual twin is the 3D-imposed hand drill model displayed in the instructor’s video. The student’s hand drill and the 3D-imposed model are connected by sensors, allowing for real-time data transmission and display. The student’s hand drill’s movement is viewable directly on the instructor’s video as an augmented model. Using this digital twin concept, students can accurately position their hand drills during teaching procedures and will visibly see when their hand drill positions stray from the instructor’s. Students can instantly know when they are doing anything incorrect or different from the instructor. In a real-class setting, teachers would be present to watch a student’s hand position and point out errors, but with digital twin technology, DenTeach lets students watch for their own mistakes (see
Figure 9). In addition, a virtual twin of each student stores the performance metrics, and their physical actions are measured as KPIs and updated in real-time onto the student’s profile. DT-Performer software stores any changes or new data transmitted to the virtual twin. The instructor can review the student’s profile (virtual twin) and analyze their progress regardless of physical proximity to the student (physical twin); i.e., the instructor can view all changes to the virtual twin remotely. In addition, all data updates are in real-time, so the students’ information displayed is accurate to their current abilities.
6.2. Flexible Applications
There are two different combinations for using DenTeach:
6.3. Case Studies
We reviewed the two existing articles on DenTeach: Cheng et al. first [
45] and the one by Maddahi et al. second [
18].
6.3.1. Proof of Concept
Cheng et al. conducted a case study on DenTeach to measure the KPIs and the system’s ability to help the instructors teach and help the students learn more effectively compared to existing traditional techniques. In the case study, the instructor completed three dental tasks while the student followed along at the student workstation. The three tasks performed were Class I, II, and V composite preparations, which Cheng et al. described as involving different lesion sizes and caries, for active practicing on a plastic tooth characterized by rheostat engagement and drill operation [
45]. The tasks were: Task 1: Class I composite preparation on tooth 46. Task 2: Class II composite preparation on tooth 45. Task 3: Class V composite preparation on tooth 46.
The student followed the instructor’s motion reasonably well using DT-RealFee Handpiece. The student’s motion deviations were within a range expected by the instructor and were within the acceptable interval set by the instructor. There were three recorded times with higher deviation than the interval set. For Task 2, there were two deviations, and for Task 3, there were four. Note that the student adjusted their hand positioning to be within the allowable range once the RealFeel Handpiece notified the student of excessive deviation. After completing Tasks 1, 2, and 3, the instructor and the student received the KPIs. Cheng et al. stated that the combination of KPIs, video views, and graphical reports in teaching and shadowing mode helps students understand the areas they need to improve [
45]. In all KPIs reported, the student’s standard deviation was higher than the instructor’s, indicating the need for the student to improve in all areas.
In shadowing mode, the student used the RealFeel Handpiece to review the tasks taught by the instructor. In this mode, students can acquire more quantitative feedback to help them become confident and prepare for practice mode by providing hands-on practice with the actual dental handpiece. Shadowing mode saves material and time with minimal supervision [
45]. Students are not restricted to in-person laboratories, as DenTeach can be used anywhere with an Internet connection to practice dental operations. In the reported study, the student performed five trials of Task 1 in shadowing mode. They performed assessments using the three Euler angles, the student’s deviations from the instructor’s, and the amount of pressure exerted on the tooth. KPIs reported from trial 1 to trial 5 show that the ranges of motion in trial 5—axial, side-to-side, and back-to-front rotations—decreased by 52.4%, 25.9%, and 74.9% compared to trial 1. Additionally, the standard deviations in both angulation and speed components were reduced from trial 1 to trial 5. The KPIs presented from the DenTeach sensors showed that the student’s ability to handle the tool in a more limited workspace and a smoother manner improved from trial 1 to trial 5.
In practice mode, the student uses the real dental handpiece to practice the three tasks. For this mode, a wireless sensory system identical to the instructor’s sensors is used to measure the signals and calculate the KPIs. The sensory system and camera record and communicate the audiovisual vibrotactile information to the database. The system then compares the recorded audiovisual vibrotactile data from the student with the instructor. At the end of each trial, the student can submit the results and the audiovisual signals to the instructor.
For this part of the study, the student had ten trials to complete. Cheng et al. reported that the student achieved improved scores in most of the KPIs, including the haptic jerk index, used to assess the steadiness of tool handling. The maximum alues of longitudinal, lateral, and vertical jerk indices decreased by 1.3%, 64.8%, and 25.8%, respectively. The results indicate that the student’s hand steadiness improved from trial 1 to trial 10. After the ten trials, the student could complete the task 25.5% faster than in the first trial. In addition, the interruption index improved by 43.7%, indicating the student was more confident in handling the handpiece in the last trial than in the first trial.
6.3.2. Ethical Aspects in DenTeach
The second existing article on DenTeach relates to roboethics. Roboethics is necessary because it helps set up guidelines for dealing with moral dilemmas arising in robotics [
18]. Maddahi et al. rated DenTeach on principles of data, common good, and safety in a case study and listed potential ethical considerations for DenTeach’s implementation.
Privacy, Security, Longevity: To protect students’ privacy, students should only have access to their performance information, whereas the instructor can see all student data [
18]. Additionally, as the recorded information is in servers and cloud-based storage, it is necessary to have cybersecurity in place to protect from hackers. The integrity of the instructor’s assessment is void if the stored data are tampered with; i.e., measures need to be in place to avoid compromised data.
In terms of longevity, DenTeach allows for remote software upgrades. In addition, Tactile Robotics provides a 4-year guarantee and 24/7 tech support for DenTeach [
18]. For software updates, access to instructor’s data, and contact tech support, users of DenTeach will need a stable Internet connection. Maddahi et al. recognize that while most of North America has access to the Internet, some areas may still not have a stable Internet connection. Dental schools should take into consideration the accessibility of Internet services when accepting international students situated abroad.
Benefits of DenTeach: DenTeach is for remote learning during a pandemic, but this is not its sole beneficial use. DenTeach allows for unbiased quantitative feedback to students, which is vital, as dental schools require program standardization and objective evaluation [
18]. In addition to an impartial evaluation system, all students receive learning material the same way, as the content exists on a server.
Students can use DenTeach for self-study and self-analysis due to the available education modes (shadowing and practice mode) and the built-in software that tracks and displays the student’s progress in the form of KPIs. Maddahi et al. noted that self-study and self-analysis are vital steps in mastering dental techniques.
As DenTeach is portable, dental schools can admit students from areas without dental schools, which benefits the students and their communities. Providing global teaching and learning is relevant, as it supports the principle of equitable access to technology. Maddahi et al. noted this as one of the ten ethical principles for developing artificial intelligence (AI).
Another quality of DenTeach that allows for inclusive learning is the ambidextrous setup. The setup allows for both left-hand and right-hand users [
18]. Students can practice in a way that is natural and comfortable for them.
Safety: Although the setup includes a dental drill and is a few pounds in weight, physical harm or death from DenTeach is unlikely. Maddahi et al. believe that safety is not a significant concern for DenTeach, as it would require a person to have malicious intent or an accident to result in physical injury. As such, safety would not be a significant issue.
6.3.3. Pandemic Impact
Both Cheng et al. and Maddahi et al. reported on how DenTeach is valuable for education systems, and how can help students and teachers with remote training challenges. DenTeach is portable and affordable, making it a good way for dental institutes to continue their education during the pandemic. Much like the other digital twins for student learning listed in the previous sections, DenTeach can increase teaching efficiency by accelerating skill acquisition by students and removing limitations based on classroom size [
18,
45]. DenTeach provides extensive quantitative feedback (KPIs) and performance data, allowing students to learn and practice individually. Using the sensors, actuators, and augmented reality environment, students can learn the proper handling of dental tools [
18]. DenTeach provides real-time video, audio, feel, and posture information while synchronizing the operations of the instructor and the student. Instructors can analyze the different needs of students from the KPIs generated from the software and evaluate their skill levels [
45]. The case study by Cheng et al. [
45] on DenTeach for remote education showed that a combination of KPIs, video recordings, and graphical reports in different learning modes effectively help the student evaluate their skill levels and help them to improve.
6.3.4. Traditional Learning vs. DenTeach
The existing review of how DenTeach compares to traditional teaching is positive. The results of the DenTeach case study demonstrated that the KPIs, video views, and graphical reports from teaching and shadowing modes help students understand which areas of their work need further improvement [
45].
Table 2 is a summary of the main differences between traditional learning and DenTeach. The most obvious difference between traditional learning and DenTeach is the physical setting of the student’s learning environment. As DenTeach can be used remotely, there is unrestricted classroom size, and lessons can be accessed regardless of time and distance from the instructor’s location.
6.3.5. Adoption and Implementation: Requirements
Hartmann and Van der Auweraer noted that digital twins should enforce requirements for successful employment in standard industrial practice [
46]. Requirements:
Interactivity—The value of digital twins depends on speed and accuracy. High accuracy can result in time-consuming processes. Increasing the speed while retaining accuracy is vital for extending the use of digital twins.
Reliability—Users of digital twins should not have to be experts, except during their use in design and engineering. Any prediction by the digital twin must be accurate or display a percentage of error, so users of all skill levels can interpret the results. In addition, digital twins must be self-aware and notify users if they are outside their area of usage.
Usability—Simulation tools presently are designed for experts, but expert resources are limited, so the use is limited by the availability of experts. Digital twins’ development needs a usability perspective to allow users to include non-experts.
Security—Business models based on the digital twin may require an exchange of digital twins between parties. Measures must be in place to prevent reverse engineering and protect privacy and intellectual property.
Deployability—Digital twin usage is different depending on the users and their goals. Distribution should be simple to reduce barriers and efforts.
Synchronicity—Digital twins connect the virtual and physical worlds. The virtual twin must adapt to synchronize with its physical twin, including adapting based on physical breakdowns, reconfiguration, and service replacements.
7. Future of Digital Twins
The widespread use of digital twins in the future is foreseeable. With the improvements in augmented reality (AR) technology and significant cost savings from using digital twins, it is not surprising that more and more companies are integrating digital twins into their daily usage.
In a recent report by the NGen’s Digital Twins Advisory Board [
47], 83% answered that lack of funding for digital twins was the main reason digital twins’ adoption in Canada is not more widespread. More funding for digital twin research and development in Canadian organizations is needed to prevent Canada from trailing behind other countries studying digital twins.
With companies like Meta (previously Facebook) heavily invested in AR and the Metaverse, digital twins could be the next step to advancing virtual economies. Imagine a future where people can use wearable technologies such as smart glasses to interact with their real-life surroundings to see a digital overlay and relevant information viewable only through their glasses.
Allam and Jones predicted some ambitious uses of digital twins in the future: People might experience and explore virtual environments through digital twins of physical and biological worlds. People of all occupations might use digital twins to create virtual twins of their work subjects and objects to observe, monitor, and alter the physical objects remotely in real-time. People might operate large business enterprises remotely without being physically on-site through digital twins [
40,
42].
Saddik et al. explored the future of digital twins and listed some possible uses in preventative medicine, social interactions and dating, raising children, and sports [
48].
For preventative medicine, they suggested that patients use digital twins to look at their virtual selves, monitor their health and illnesses, and visualize any other happenings inside their bodies. Patients can access and view their medical records, health information, eating behavior, sleep data, and workout data, thereby allowing them (or healthcare professionals) to visualize their health state at any time.
In social interactions and dating, digital twins can help match single people together more successfully. Digital twins can allow for more accurate dating profiles. They can let people simulate situations with potential partners. Digital twins can help reduce fake profiles and better predict the compatibility of two people.
Saddik et al. suggested using digital twins to help parents with raising children. Parents can interact with the digital twins of their children to relay messages and provide instructions indirectly. With the increasing use of technology among children, and as more households have both parents working concurrently, digital twins may be a viable solution to help parents remotely interact with and teach their children.
In sports, digital twins can store an athlete’s data for each game they play to help them understand how to practice and perform better. The athlete can access the stored information after each game to assess their play style and determine where they need improvement. The data can be from wearable trackers on the athlete or even sensors built into the ball and equipment.
In dentistry, we believe more digital twin technology will be developed further. Hopefully, many more studies will demonstrate the unlimited potential of digital twins in dentistry and remote dental education. We also note that as digital twin technology is still emerging, the term “digital twins” may also keep changing and updating to include more tools. Much like how the earliest computers were used for calculations and now include much greater functions, we may eventually see digital twins become more complex in their functionalities.
We summarize our proposed roadmap in
Figure 10 for digital twins’ adoption in dental education based on the findings from our case review.
Finally, for future research papers, we suggest a proposal for a reference to digital twin architecture in the dental field.
9. Patents
The DenTeach, DT-Rightway Dental Articulator, and DT-PrepScanner have been disclosed by Maddahi A., Bagheri S., Mardan M., Kalvandi M. and Maddahi Y.—inventors; Tactile Robotics Ltd., assignee. Vibrotactile method, apparatus, and system for training and practicing dental procedures. United States patent application US 17/271,470. 2021—Maddahi Y., Kalvandi M., Maddahi A. and Asadi A.A., inventors; Tactile Robotics Ltd., assignee. Automated dental articulator and method for training and practicing dental procedures. United States patent application US 17/115,166. 2021 and Maddahi Y., Kalvandi M., Maddahi A., and Dhannapuneni P., inventors; Tactile Robotics Ltd., Automated apparatus and method for quantifying dimensions of dental preparations. United States patent application US63/164,759. 2022.