**5. Conclusions**

It thus appears that such a complete, sensitive and rigorous task [38] implemented at the diagnostic level can provide a clear and specific window into brain functions and connectivity, allowing the identification of multiple and complex alterations in attention following mTBI. This highlights the necessity of measuring various aspects of information processing before drawing an early conclusion of complete recovery on the basis of a single variable or of postconcussion symptomatology alone.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, J.B.-T., P.J. and M.M.; Data curation, J.B.-T.; Formal analysis, J.B.-T., P.J. and M.M.; Funding acquisition, J.B.-T., P.J. and M.M.; Investigation, J.B.-T. and P.J.; Methodology, J.B.-T., P.J. and M.M.; Project administration, J.B.-T. and M.M.; Resources, P.J. and M.M.; Software, P.J. and M.M.; Supervision, P.J. and M.M.; Validation, P.J.; Visualization, J.B.-T. and P.J.; Writing—original draft, J.B.-T.; Writing—review and editing, P.J. and M.M.

**Funding:** This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (scholarship to J.B.-T.), by research funds (awarded to M.M.) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (N.S.E.R.C.) of Canada and the Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network, and funding from the N.S.E.R.C., the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Canada Research Chairs program awarded to P.J., and finally by infrastructure support to the Centre for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognition, and the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation from the *Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé (F.R.Q.S.)*.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors wish to thank Elaine de Guise, Nicolas Robitaille, Christine Lefebvre, and Stéphane Denis for their help and support at various levels of this project.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.
