**5. Conclusions**

In conclusion, the spatial variation enabled by the dual-stream task and the use of two types of lures provided rich opportunity for observing a variety of lure e ffects which require more solid theoretical interpretation than could here be achieved post hoc.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/9/12/365/s1, Table S1: Percentages of trials with correctly identified targets.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, R.V. and L.M.; software, L.M.; formal analysis, R.V.; investigation, K.S. ´ and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, R.V.; writing—review and editing, K.S., M.N., L.M.; visualization, ´ R.V.; funding acquisition, R.V. and M.N.

**Funding:** This work was supported by grants Ve110/15-2 and Ni513/8-2 awarded from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to R.V. and M.N. as parts of the network PAK270 "Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of conscious and unconscious visual perception".

**Acknowledgments:** Critical comments provided by three reviewers (Dirk Kerzel and two anonymous ones) on an earlier version of this manuscript considerably helped in improving the paper.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
