**5. Conclusions**

In conclusion, these pieces of evidence seem to support the models of selective attention focused on objects as a whole. In our study, the recognition of the shape of a target object that lacked detail modulated several ERP components associated with motor inhibition (N2), attentive selection (SN), and item categorization (P300) processes at di fferent time latencies and scalp distribution. A fronto-temporo-limbic network seems to underlie such object-based attentive processes. The scalp distribution of the SN component and related neural sources (i.e., left MTG/STG and IFJ) were consistent with the hypothesis of a left-hemispheric advantage for non-spatial visual attention. The present results integrate the previous literature on brain asymmetries relative to attentional control for local and global levels of stimulus processing. They seem to sugges<sup>t</sup> a specific role of the left hemisphere in attentive selection and, thus, recognition of objects and relative features.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization and Methodology, A.O. and A.M.P.; Investigation, A.O.; Formal Analysis, A.O.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, A.O.; Writing – Review & Editing, A.M.P.; Supervision, A.M.P.

**Funding:** The authors received no specific funding for this study.

**Conflicts of Interest:** Authors declare no conflict of interest.
