**1. Introduction**

In recent years, the problems associated with waste management have become very relevant in the frame of a more sustainable model of development and consumption of new resources and energy [1–7]. The construction industry is one of the activities with the greatest consumption of raw materials together with large production of waste [8–14]. Specifically, the broad use of plastics in building/construction applications, especially expanded polystyrene (EPS), requires new and low environmental impact approaches for the optimization of the production processes and the reduction of by-products [15–18]. For this reason, recycling operations can be considered important tasks to increase the sustainability of a material which is converted into a new resource, the so-called secondary raw material. For the purpose, expanded polystyrene is a completely recyclable material, widely used because of cost-effectiveness, versatility and performance characteristics [18–21]. It is manufactured

from styrene monomer using a process during which pentane gas is added to the polymer in order to induce expansion with the following production of spherical beads. EPS is a thermoplastic polymer widely used in many applications (buildings, packaging) due to the relevant features as thermal insulation, durability, lightness, strength, shock absorption, and processability which allow high performance and economic products to be obtained [22–27]. EPS is a closed cell material with low water absorption and high resistance to moisture, thus preserving shape, size, and structure after water saturation. EPS resins are widespread polymers in the building/construction field and in civil engineering, usually available in sheet form, shapes or large blocks and used for floor insulation, closed cavity walls, roofs, etc., but also employed in road foundations, pavement construction, impact sound insulation, drainage, modular construction elements, lightweight conglomerates (concretes, mortars), etc. [28–34].

In this work, lightweight cement mortars containing recycled expanded polystyrene (EPS) from the grinding of industrial scraps were prepared with partial or complete replacement of the standard sand aggregate in the mixture, with no addition of additives. A study on the rheological, thermo-mechanical, microstructural, and wetting properties of the samples was conducted. The effect of the aggregate size and size distribution was evaluated and a comparison with specimens based on conventional and/or normalized sand was carried-out.

The aim was to realize an environmental, sustainable material with low specific mass and thermal insulating properties and characterized by high technical performances in term of hydrophobicity, low water absorption [35–39], and with a low impact manufacturing process. On the contrary to that observed in conventional cement composites, characterized by porosity and hydrophilicity, hydrophobic composites usually show longer durability together with self-cleaning properties [40,41]. Cement structure protection follows standard protocols based on impregnation/coating of external layers by silane or siloxane moieties thus leaving a hydrophilic consolidated concrete composite [41,42]. The addition of polymers to the fresh mixture together with the application of hydrophobic coatings on the hardened artifacts has been shown to lead to a reduction of water penetration thus converting the reference building material to have a hydrophobic or over-hydrophobic nature [43,44]. In the present research, the conglomerate did not show any coating on the surface and the whole mass was modified, for this reason the side and the fracture surfaces were investigated.

These lightweight thermo-insulating composites can be considered environmentally sustainable materials for indoor non-structural artifacts because they are prepared with non-pre-treated secondary raw materials and with a cheap route since complex techniques of production are not required. These treatments and processes would, however, be more effective in the case of production on a larger scale.

#### **2. Materials and Methods**

#### *2.1. Preparation of the Mortars*

Cement mortars were prepared with CEM II A-LL 42.5 R (Buzzi Unicem (Casale Monferrato, Italy)) [45]. Normalized sand (~1700 g/dm3, 0.08–2 mm) was purchased by Societè Nouvelle du Littoral (Leucate, France), whereas sieved sand was used as aggregate in three specific size fractions (1–2 mm, 2–4 mm and 4–6 mm) [46,47]. Recycled expanded polystyrene (EPS), resulting from grinding of industrial scraps, was employed in three specific size fractions (1–2 mm, 2–4 mm, and 4– 6 mm). The specimens were prepared with a 0.5 W/C ratio and 40 mm × 40 mm ×160 mm prisms were obtained for the flexural/compressive tests, while cylinders (diameter = 100 mm; height = 50 mm) were prepared for the thermal tests. In the case of the mechanical tests the samples were cured in water for 7, 28, 45, and 60 days, while in the case of the thermal tests the samples were cured in water for 28 days.

The reference was prepared with normalized sand [46] and named Normal. EPS was added into the conglomerate with a partial or complete replacement of the standard sand aggregate which was made on volume basis rather than on weight basis [48–50] due to the low specific mass of polystyrene. The samples (excluding the Normal) were prepared with a volume of aggregate of 500 cm3. Tables 1 and 2 show the composition of the aggregate and of the relative mortars.

Total sand replacement was carried out with EPS grains in the 1–2 mm (30 g/dm3), 2–4 mm (15 g/dm3) and 4–6 mm (10 g/dm3) bead size range and EPS2, EPS3, and EPS4 samples were obtained as reported in Tables 1 and 2. Another reference, named Sand, prepared with sand size in the range of 1–2 mm (50%), 2–4 mm (25%), and 4–6 mm (25%), was compared to the EPS specimens. A Sand-EPS sample was prepared after replacement of the 50% sand volume with 4–6 mm EPS grains (Sand/EPS).


**Table 1.** Composition of the aggregates in the composites.

