*4.2. Dictator Behavior*

*Result 1: Reflective subjects transfer less in the dictator game than intuitive subjects.*

*Reflective* subjects transfer on average less than those not *reflective* (average transfer of DKK 28.2 and DKK 36.4, respectively). This difference is statistically significant at the 5% significance level (*p* = 0.03, MWU).

The average amount transferred to the *recipient* in the *dictator game* was DKK 30.4. The modal transfer was DKK 50, which 44.5% of the subjects chose, whereas 36% of the subjects chose to keep the entire endowment to themselves.

Transferring 0 DKK to the *receiver* and thus comply with the prediction from standard economic theory is more common for the *reflective* subjects (40.1% chose this versus 25% of the *non-reflective*). This difference is statistically significant at the 5% level (*<sup>p</sup>* <sup>=</sup> 0.032, *<sup>χ</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>−</sup> *test*). However, a part of the difference can be contributed to gender: Males are found significantly more likely to transfer DKK 0 to the *receiver* in the *dictator game* Thus, it appears that acting selfish in the *dictator game* is independent of being *reflective* when controlling for gender. Gender seems to be the significant factor that predicts behavioral differences (see Table 1).
