**G.8—Acceptance and Perception of Conditions**

**G.8.1** Impact of tall structure(s) on existing view corridors (expert assessment, score); **G.8.2** Panoramic and scenic routes or viewpoints (expert assessment, score); **G.8.3** Perceived safety of public areas for pedestrians (expert assessment, score); **G.8.4** Impact of commercial signage on the visual environment (expert assessment, score); **G.8.5** Impact of overhead electric distribution system on the visual environment (expert assessment, score); **G.8.6** Perceptual quality of area development (expert assessment, score); **G.8.7** Aesthetic quality of new facility exteriors (expert assessment, score)

\* Key Performance Indicator (KPI).

### **Appendix B**

**Table A3.** Overview of national pilots 1, KPI values and neighbourhood scale sustainability issue scores, and scenario results (where available).

**Italy (A) Neighbourhood pre1950 with mixed uses**: 1.1 km2, 613 buildings, social housing (101,109 m2), other (93,099 m2); 12,607 inhabitants; recently has undergone a major urban transformation (e.g., underground railway to reunite parts of divided urban areas, new low circulation roads). **KPIs** \*: 0.5/8.2/235/78.2/403/0/1.23/86/63.5/0.8/17.2/118/100/12.1/100/0

**Sustainability scores \*\***: 0.4/0.1/1/−1/0.9/−1/2.6; Total: 0.62

**Neighbourhood for social housing**: 1 km2, 333 buildings, residential (226,983 m2) and commercial (3960 m2) buildings; 4455 inhabitants. **KPIs \***: 7.2/9.7/76.3/17.4/252/3/3/34/48.7/0.9/61/22/90.1/84.9/97.3/4

**Sustainability scores \*\***: 4.6/0.9/−1/0.3/1.2/2.3/2.3; Total: 1.42

**Italy (B) Scenario**: Renovate two building; Redevelop area used as barracks (construct some new buildings and recover some existing structures); Develop new sports areas, green spaces, access roads; Introduce new services for residents; Motivate local food production for personal use; Enable participative involvement of residents

**KPIs \***: 7.2/9.7/74.3/17.4/181.1/3/3.1/33.9/48.7/0.9/60.8/22/90.1/84.9/97.3/5

**Sustainability scores \*\***: 4.6/0.9/−1/1.1/1.2/2.4/3.4; Total: 1.75




EnvirobatBDM, in Greece by National Observatory of Athens, in Italy by iiSBE Italia, City of Torino, and City of Udine, in Malta by University of Malta and in Spain by Government of Catalonia and City of Sant Cugat del Vallès. \* **Neighbourhood KPIs**; for descriptive names see Table A1: A.1.7 (%)/B.3.3 (€/m2/y)/C.1.1 (kWh/m2/y)/C.1.4 (kWh/m2/y)/C.1.7 (kWh/m2/y)/C.2.1 (%)/C.2.7 (%)/D.1.2 (kgCO2eq/m2/y)/E.1.6 (m3/occupant/y)/E.1.7 (m3/m2)/F.1.3 (%)/F.2.3 (days/y)/G.2.1 (%)/G.2.4 (m/100 inhabitants)/G.4.2 (%)/G.6.3 level(score); \*\* **Neighbourhood sustainability issue scores**: A-Urban systems/B-Economy/C-Energy/D-Emissions/E-Natural resources/F-Environment/G-Social aspects; Scores: −1 (below minimum), 0 (minimum acceptable performance), 1 (improved performance over minimum), 2 (significantly higher over minimum), 3 (best practice), 4 (improved over best practice), 5 (ideal performance).

### **References**


©2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel Switzerland Tel. +41 61 683 77 34 Fax +41 61 302 89 18 www.mdpi.com

*Energies* Editorial Office E-mail: energies@mdpi.com www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel Switzerland

Tel: +41 61 683 77 34 Fax: +41 61 302 89 18