*Article* **Influence of Bias Correction Methods on Simulated Köppen***−***Geiger Climate Zones in Europe**

**Beáta Szabó-Takács 1,\*, Aleš Farda 1,2, Petr Skalák 1,2 and Jan Meitner <sup>1</sup>**


Received: 7 December 2018; Accepted: 19 January 2019; Published: 22 January 2019

**Abstract:** Our goal was to investigate the influence of bias correction methods on climate simulations over the European domain. We calculated the Köppen−Geiger climate classification using five individual regional climate models (RCM) of the ENSEMBLES project in the European domain during the period 1961−1990. The simulated precipitation and temperature data were corrected using the European daily high-resolution gridded dataset (E-OBS) observed data by five methods: (i) the empirical quantile mapping of precipitation and temperature, (ii) the quantile mapping of precipitation and temperature based on gamma and Generalized Pareto Distribution of precipitation, (iii) local intensity scaling, (iv) the power transformation of precipitation and (v) the variance scaling of temperature bias corrections. The individual bias correction methods had a significant effect on the climate classification, but the degree of this effect varied among the RCMs. Our results on the performance of bias correction differ from previous results described in the literature where these corrections were implemented over river catchments. We conclude that the effect of bias correction may depend on the region of model domain. These results suggest that distribution free bias correction approaches are the most suitable for large domain sizes such as the pan-European domain.

**Keywords:** Regional Climate Model; climate classification; bias correction methods; precipitation; temperature
