*7.2. Micro Rotation Profile*

This region is stanch to the argument and anticipation of the effects of numerous parameters modeled from Equation (2) on *f* (η). The impact of *K*, γ\* and α on micro rotation velocity *S*(η) is discussed, respectively. It is clear from the Figures 12–14, that micro rotation velocity *S*(η) augmented with higher value of *K*, γ\*, and α.

**Figure 12.** The variation of the micro rotation profile *S*(η) for the case of SWCNT and MWCNT versus the similarity variable for the distinct values of the material parameter *K*.

**Figure 13.** The variation of the micro rotation profile *S*(η) for the case of SWCNT and MWCNT versus the similarity variable for the distinct values of the vortex velocity or material parameter γ\*.

**Figure 14.** The variation of the micro rotation profile *S*(η) for the case of SWCNT and MWCNT versus the similarity variable for the distinct values of the temperature difference parameter α.

#### *7.3. Concentration*

This part presented the discussion and anticipation of the effects of numerous parameters modeled from Equation (4) on *g*(η). The impact of *Sc* and *Gr* on concentration profile is discussed, respectively. Figure 15 is illustrated to examine the performance of (*Sc*) on *g*(η). Higher values of (*Sc*) the diffusivity of mass declines and thus concentration is deteriorated. The influence of the chemical response factor *Gr* on the concentration of Maxwell micropolar nanofluid is presented in Figure 16. It is observed that the augmented rate of *Gr* reduces the concentration of Maxwell micropolar nanofluid.

**Figure 15.** The variation of the concentration profile *g*(η) for the case of SWCNT and MWCNT versus the similarity variable for the distinct values of the Schmidt number *Sc*.

**Figure 16.** The variation of the concentration profile g(η) for the case of SWCNT and MWCNT versus the similarity variable for the distinct values of the chemical response factor *Gr*.
