4.2.2. Bristol

In the Bristol case, the total losses range from 400,000€ to around 1,000,000 € maximum.

The patterns followed are virtually identical to the previous study case. The results produced for Bristol city with the application of FC2 and FC3 are quite similar while the FC1 generates slightly greater losses (Figure 15).

**Figure 15.** Summary chart of the monetization results for the Barcelona study case. It is differentiated between the return period studied (T), different fragility curves applied (FC) and scenarios applied.

In the map represented in Figure 16, it is possible to see where the costs from 1,000€ to 50,000€ are located and which type of flooding (i.e., tidal/fluvial (CAFRA) or pluvial (SWMP)) is causing the loss and the scenario in which is caused. The most severe cases are located around the city center and caused by tidal fluvial problems, with some cases that can provoke losses up to 40,000€ in the current scenario, or up to 50,000€ in the BAU scenario.

**Figure 16.** Bristol map representing the locations that are prone to produce the major losses provoked by electrical shortages in the return periods T100.

The losses caused by pluvial events are in other points of the Bristol area, more specifically in the Henbury ward with losses up to 40,000€ and in the Hengrove ward with losses up to 30,000€.
