**Steven E. Grosby**

Department of Philosophy and Religion, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; sgrosby@clemson.edu Received: 22 July 2019; Accepted: 5 September 2019; Published: 8 September 2019

**Abstract:** An examination of the relation between nationality and religion calls for comparative analysis. There is a variability of the relation over time and from one nation and religion to another. At times, nationality and religion have clearly converged; but there have also been times when they have diverged. Examination of this variability may lead to generalizations that can be achieved through comparison. While the generalizations achieved through a comparative analysis of the relation are heuristically useful, there are complications that qualify those generalizations. Moreover, while further refining the comparative framework of the relation between nationality and religion remains important, it is not the pressing theoretical problem. That problem is ascertaining what is distinctive of religion as a category of human thought and action such that it is distinguishable from nationality and, thus, a variable in the comparative analysis. It may be that determining that distinctiveness results in the need for a di fferent framework to analyze the relation between nationality and religion.

**Keywords:** axial age; kinship; monolatry; monotheism; nation; priest; religion; territory
