*Study Limitations*

One of the weaknesses of the present study is the individual recollection of HA data, but the strict bases of building up HA maps point at the recommendation of releasing it throughout participatory processes. Nor should be forgotten the importance of devolution of the results from mapping actions to the population in order to provoke reflection and raise awareness about their health potential. This aspect was not developed in this study due to the exploratory design. Another limitation is related to the cross-sectional study design, which hampers the ability to make causal inferences. Although these types of measures help enrich the perception of reality, they may, however, induce bias; while considering that a bias exists regarding the homogeneity of the sample in favor of female participants. On this, it is also convenient to highlight that one of the strengths of the present study is the use of mixed-methods combining the qualitative HA identification with another quantitative phase focused on exploring the relations between all HA categories reported with Antonovsky's sense of coherence. This groundbreaking approach could allow obtaining new information of great interest in the fulfillment of the objectives of global salutogenic strategies.
