**Table 3.** *Cont*.

Source: own research.

### **Table 4.** Resulting values of the SWOT analysis.


Source: own research.

### *3.3. Assessment of SWOT Analysis*

The first step in the assessment of the SWOT analysis was to perform an evaluation based on multi-criteria decision-making carried out by a specialized group. This was followed by a calculation of the value of the weight criterion using Fuller's triangle, where the expert group compared the significance/priority of the individual elements of the SWOT analysis. A subsequent product of the identified values was then used to determine the strength of each criterion. All the data are provided in Table 3. An overview is provided by the sums for individual components of the SWOT areas, which are compared against each other in Table 4.

The resulting values of the SWOT analysis show that water-related crises for which a type plan has been prepared within crisis managemen<sup>t</sup> based on a risk analysis received a slightly positive score—a value of +0.60. The factors arising from the internal environment are stronger than those arising from the external environment; that being said, the resulting score difference of 0.60 can also be considered very small. It is clear that it remains necessary to support and expand on the strengths, such as the preparation of detailed type plans covering specific water-related crises. Furthermore, the analysis also suggests that it would be helpful to take a closer look at problematic areas, notably the preparedness of all societal tools and solutions used for locations with high concentrations of inhabitants, municipal agglomerations and the need to implement timely and correct reactions in stationary medical and social facilities.

From another perspective, a comparison between the positive (S + O) and negative (W+T) environments was carried out. Here it is clear that the more dominant environment is the positive one, with a value of 7.67 compared to −6.67. The resulting difference is +1.00, indicating that the positive environment is dominant.

The final values also indicate that the system for handling water-related crises in the Czech Republic for which a type plan has been prepared based on risk analysis within crisis managemen<sup>t</sup> is mildly positive. Further improvements are possible by reinforcing the system's strengths and minimizing its weaknesses in a way which makes use of available opportunities.
