*Article* **Investigation on Symmetric and Asymmetric Broadband Low-Loss W-Band Pillbox Windows**

**Tongbin Yang <sup>1</sup> , Xiaotong Guan 2,3 , Wenjie Fu 1,3,\* , Dun Lu <sup>1</sup> , Chaoyang Zhang <sup>1</sup> , Jie Xie <sup>1</sup> , Xuesong Yuan 1,3 and Yang Yan 1,3**


Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 3 December 2020

**Abstract:** In order to develop wide-band low-loss windows for W-band vacuum electronic devices and easily fabricate them, symmetric and asymmetric pillbox windows are investigated and reported in this paper. A symmetric pillbox window and an asymmetric pillow-box window were designed, simulation optimized, fabricated, and tested. The initial parameters for the two pillbox windows were designed by equivalent circuit theory. Computer simulation technology (CST) three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic simulation software was used to verify and optimize the design. Because of the uncontrollability of welding during the experiment, this article provides two solutions. One is to measure and reprocess the symmetrical pillbox window with the dielectric sheet welded to reduce the influence of welding on the measurement results; the other is an asymmetrical box window which is designed to avoid the error caused by the welding of the box window. The best experimental results for the symmetric pillbox window were |*S*21| close to 1 dB and reflection parameter |*S*11| close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. The experimental results for the asymmetric pillbox window were |*S*21| < 1 dB nearly in the frequency range of 76–109.5 GHz. The experimental results show that both solutions efficiently complete the design of broadband pillbox windows and would potentially be operated in the gigahertz millimeter-wave region.

**Keywords:** pillbox window; wide-band; W-band; low loss

## **1. Introduction**

Microwave vacuum tubes, such as traveling wave tubes (TWTs), klystrons, magnetrons, and gyrotrons, are important electronic devices. As high-power microwave radiation sources, vacuum tubes are widely used in microwave applications, including wireless communication, high-resolution radar and imaging [1], and industrial heating. In the research of microwave vacuum tubes, the window system is used to isolate the vacuum and atmosphere, which is an indispensable component. Diverse window configurations have been reported, such as the single-disc [2], multi-disc [3], and pillbox [4–7] configurations. Compared with other types of window systems, the pillbox window system has the advantages of being wideband and easy to braze, having large power capacity, and so on. It has been widely used in window design [8–10].

In the research of W-band microwave vacuum windows, great achievements have been made. Table 1 lists the results of microwave windows that have been experimentally tested in recent years. It can be seen from Table 1 that the pillbox window can be applied to various frequency bands of microwaves and millimeter waves. In W-band, the working frequency bands in most of the measured results for pillbox windows were concentrated within 90–100 GHz [6]. Bandwidth is one of the most important indicators of a microwave window and directly affects the performance of vacuum devices. This paper extends the working band of pillbox windows to 76–110 GHz, which is suitable for microwave devices in the full W-band.


**Table 1.** Some achievements in vacuum microwave windows.

The traditional pillbox window system consists of three distinct parts: two symmetrical rectangular waveguides, a straight cylindrical waveguide, and a cylindrical waveguide filled with dielectric. The dielectric window is brazed in a straight circular waveguide. At low working frequency, this type of pillbox window has many advantages and is applied in many products. However, when the operation frequency is up to the sub-millimeter-wave and millimeter-wave region, the yield and reliability of this pillbox window are very low in fabrication and assembly. To improve the success rate of the pillbox window, the traditional window is tested and analyzed in this paper. The reasons for low assembly efficiency are as follows: (1) With increasing operation frequency, the structural parameters of the pillbox window decrease. In the sub-millimeter-wave and millimeter-wave region, it is hard to ensure that the dielectric window is centered and vertical in the straight circular waveguide; thus, it is easy to simulate spurious modes, reducing the bandwidth. (2) Symmetrical pillbox windows cannot be tested before they are brazed. If the test results are not satisfactory, the window is scrapped. To solve these problems, this paper provides two solutions. One is to measure and process the symmetrical pillbox window with the dielectric sheet welded to avoid the influence of welding on the measurement results; the other is an asymmetric pillbox window that was investigated (these results have been published in another paper [14]), the structure of which is shown in Figure 1b. In comparison to the conventional symmetric pillow-box window which is shown in Figure 1a, we see that the diameter of the two sections of the cylindrical waveguide is different in the asymmetric pillow-box window. This system can nicely restrain the variations caused by the brazing process and ensure consistency between the experimental results and design. It can also be roughly tested before brazing to correct the structural parameters.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the selection of the window dielectric material, equivalent circuit theory of the symmetrical pillbox window, simulation results, and structural parameters of the two kinds of pillbox window. Section 3 is devoted to experiments, analysis of experiment results, and improvement of the symmetrical pillbox window and the experimental result of the asymmetrical pillbox window. Section 4 concludes the paper.

*Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 11

*Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 11

**Figure 1.** Structure of the (**a**) symmetrical pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetrical pillbox window. **Figure 1.** Structure of the (**a**) symmetrical pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetrical pillbox window. experimental result of the asymmetrical pillbox window. Section 4 concludes the paper.

#### This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the selection of the window dielectric **2. Model Design and Simulation 2. Model Design and Simulation**

material, equivalent circuit theory of the symmetrical pillbox window, simulation results, and structural parameters of the two kinds of pillbox window. Section 3 is devoted to experiments, analysis of experiment results, and improvement of the symmetrical pillbox window and the experimental result of the asymmetrical pillbox window. Section 4 concludes the paper. **2. Model Design and Simulation**  In the design of the pillbox window, the first step is the determination of the material of the In the design of the pillbox window, the first step is the determination of the material of the window piece. Sapphire was finally selected in this investigation; its reference factors include high strength and small electric loss tangent (<<sup>1</sup> <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> ), and the metalized technology is mature. Strictly speaking, the relative permittivity values in the horizontal and vertical directions of sapphire are different. Under the condition of TE (Transverse electric) mode transmission, the difference in the dielectric constant of sapphire has little effect on the transmission of the pillbox window [13]. The relative permittivity of the transmission is 9.2, according to material reports. In the design of the pillbox window, the first step is the determination of the material of the window piece. Sapphire was finally selected in this investigation; its reference factors include high strength and small electric loss tangent (<1 × 10−4), and the metalized technology is mature. Strictly speaking, the relative permittivity values in the horizontal and vertical directions of sapphire are different. Under the condition of TE (Transverse electric) mode transmission, the difference in the dielectric constant of sapphire has little effect on the transmission of the pillbox window [13]. The relative permittivity of the transmission is 9.2, according to material reports.

window piece. Sapphire was finally selected in this investigation; its reference factors include high strength and small electric loss tangent (<1 × 10−4), and the metalized technology is mature. Strictly speaking, the relative permittivity values in the horizontal and vertical directions of sapphire are different. Under the condition of TE (Transverse electric) mode transmission, the difference in the dielectric constant of sapphire has little effect on the transmission of the pillbox window [13]. The relative permittivity of the transmission is 9.2, according to material reports. There are some calculation methods used in the design of symmetrical traditional box windows, including the impedance matching approach [6], the method of moments [13], and the There are some calculation methods used in the design of symmetrical traditional box windows, including the impedance matching approach [6], the method of moments [13], and the equivalent circuit method [7,13,15,16]. In this paper, the equivalent circuit method was used. The transmission modes in the pillbox window are the TE<sup>10</sup> mode of the rectangular waveguide and the TE<sup>11</sup> mode of the cylindrical waveguide. An equivalent circuit diagram of the pillbox window system is shown in Figure 2. The transfer matrix of the window system is divided into nine parts, under the condition of single-mode transmission [13]. In the following theoretical calculation part, we discuss the calculation process of the symmetric window. There are some calculation methods used in the design of symmetrical traditional box windows, including the impedance matching approach [6], the method of moments [13], and the equivalent circuit method [7,13,15,16]. In this paper, the equivalent circuit method was used. The transmission modes in the pillbox window are the TE10 mode of the rectangular waveguide and the TE11 mode of the cylindrical waveguide. An equivalent circuit diagram of the pillbox window system is shown in Figure 2. The transfer matrix of the window system is divided into nine parts, under the condition of single-mode transmission [13]. In the following theoretical calculation part, we discuss the calculation process of the symmetric window.

equivalent circuit method [7,13,15,16]. In this paper, the equivalent circuit method was used. The

**Figure 2.** Diagram of the equivalent circuit. **Figure 2.** Diagram of the equivalent circuit.

**Figure 2.** Diagram of the equivalent circuit. In Figure 2, *L* is the length of the rectangular waveguide; *Bc* is the equivalent susceptance of the transition from the rectangular waveguide to the circular waveguide; *L*0, *L*1, and *L*1*\** are the length of In Figure 2, *L* is the length of the rectangular waveguide; *Bc* is the equivalent susceptance of the transition from the rectangular waveguide to the circular waveguide; *L*0, *L*1, and *L*1*\** are the length of the cylindrical waveguide; *β* is the propagation constant of the TE10 mode in the rectangular waveguide; *Z* is the characteristic impedance of the rectangular waveguide; *β*1 is the propagation constant of the TE11 mode in the cylindrical waveguide; *Z*1 and *Z*1*\** are the characteristic impedance of the cylindrical waveguide; *β*0 is the propagation constant of the TE11 mode in a dielectric circular In Figure 2, *L* is the length of the rectangular waveguide; *Bc* is the equivalent susceptance of the transition from the rectangular waveguide to the circular waveguide; *L*0, *L*1, and *L*1*\** are the length of the cylindrical waveguide; β is the propagation constant of the TE<sup>10</sup> mode in the rectangular waveguide; *Z* is the characteristic impedance of the rectangular waveguide; β<sup>1</sup> is the propagation constant of the TE<sup>11</sup> mode in the cylindrical waveguide; *Z*<sup>1</sup> and *Z*1*\** are the characteristic impedance of the cylindrical waveguide; β<sup>0</sup> is the propagation constant of the TE<sup>11</sup> mode in a dielectric circular waveguide; *Z*<sup>0</sup> is the characteristic impedance of the dielectric waveguide; and *M* is the matrix of each waveguide and the connection part.

the cylindrical waveguide; *β* is the propagation constant of the TE10 mode in the rectangular waveguide; *Z* is the characteristic impedance of the rectangular waveguide; *β*1 is the propagation The transfer matrix of the window system can be obtained by multiplying the nine parts of the transfer matrix, shown as

constant of the TE11 mode in the cylindrical waveguide; *Z*1 and *Z*1*\** are the characteristic impedance of the cylindrical waveguide; *β*0 is the propagation constant of the TE11 mode in a dielectric circular *Electronics* **2020**, *9*, 2060

$$M = M\_1 \bullet M\_2 \bullet M\_3 \bullet M\_4 \bullet M\_5 \bullet M\_4^\* \bullet M\_3^\* \bullet M\_2^\* \bullet M\_1 \tag{1}$$

Substituting the transfer matrix of each part into Equation (1), the transfer matrix can be written as [16–19]

*M* = cos(β*L*) −*jZ*sin(β*L*) − *j Z* sin(β*L*) cos(β*L*) • 1 0 − *jBc Z* 1 • cos(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) −*jZ*<sup>1</sup> sin(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) − *j Z*1 sin(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) cos(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) • *R*0/*R*<sup>1</sup> 0 0 *R*1/*R*<sup>0</sup> • cos(β0*L*<sup>0</sup> ) −*jZ*<sup>0</sup> sin(β0*L*<sup>0</sup> ) − *j Z*0 sin(β0*L*<sup>0</sup> ) cos(β0*L*<sup>0</sup> ) • *R*2/*R*<sup>0</sup> 0 0 *R*0/*R*<sup>2</sup> • cos(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) −*jZ*<sup>1</sup> sin(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) − *j Z*1 sin(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) cos(β1*L*<sup>1</sup> ) • 1 0 − *jB*∗ *c Z* 1 • cos(β*L*) −*jZ*sin(β*L*) − *j Z* sin(β*L*) cos(β*L*) (2)

where *Bc* can be written as [18,19]

$$\begin{cases} B\_{\mathcal{C}} = \frac{\beta b}{2\pi} \left\{ 2\ln \frac{R\_1^{-2} - b^2}{4R\_1 b} + \left( \frac{b}{R\_1} + \frac{R\_1}{b} \right) + 2\sum\_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin^2 n\varphi}{n^3 \varphi^2} \delta\_{2n} \right\} \\\ \delta\_{2n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{\beta R\_1}{2\pi n}\right)^2}} - 1, \varphi = \frac{\pi b}{R\_1} \end{cases} \tag{3}$$

where *b* is the short side length of a rectangular waveguide, and *Bc* = *Bc*\*.

In the window system, the length of the rectangular waveguides at both sides only influences the phase of the transfer matrix, *L* is set to zero, and *R*<sup>0</sup> = *R*<sup>1</sup> = *R*2. The transfer matrix of the symmetric window system can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} M &= M\_2 \bullet M\_3 \bullet M\_5 \bullet M\_3^\* \bullet M\_2^\* \\ &= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -\frac{j\mathcal{E}\_c}{Z} & 1 \end{bmatrix} \bullet \begin{bmatrix} \cos(\beta\_1 L\_1) & -jZ\_1 \sin(\beta\_1 L\_1) \\ -\frac{j}{Z\_1} \sin(\beta\_1 L\_1) & \cos(\beta\_1 L\_1) \end{bmatrix} \bullet \begin{bmatrix} \cos(\beta\_0 L\_0) & -jZ\_0 \sin(\beta\_0 L\_0) \\ -\frac{j}{Z\_0} \sin(\beta\_0 L\_0) & \cos(\beta\_0 L\_0) \end{bmatrix} \tag{4} \\ \bullet \begin{bmatrix} \cos(\beta\_1 L\_1) & -jZ\_1 \sin(\beta\_1 L\_1) \\ -\frac{j}{Z\_1} \sin(\beta\_1 L\_1) & \cos(\beta\_1 L\_1) \end{bmatrix} \bullet \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -\frac{j\mathcal{E}\_c}{Z} & 1 \end{bmatrix} \end{aligned} \tag{5}$$

According to the relation between the transmission matrix and scattering matrix, the scattering matrix S could be written as

$$\mathbf{S} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{M\_{22} + M\_{12} - M\_{21} - M\_{11}}{M\_{11} + M\_{12} + M\_{21} + M\_{22}} & \frac{2}{M\_{11} + M\_{12} + M\_{21} + M\_{22}}\\ 2 \frac{M\_{11}M\_{22} - M\_{12}M\_{21}}{M\_{11} + M\_{12} + M\_{21} + M\_{22}} & \frac{M\_{11} + M\_{12} - M\_{21} - M\_{22}}{M\_{11} + M\_{12} + M\_{21} + M\_{22}} \end{bmatrix} \tag{5}$$

The S-parameter ideal design goal of the symmetric window is *S*<sup>12</sup> = *S*21, *S*<sup>11</sup> = *S*<sup>22</sup> = 0; thus, the structural parameters satisfy the equations

$$\begin{cases} \tan\beta\_1 L\_1 = A/B \pm \sqrt{\left(A/B\right)^2 - \mathcal{C}/B} \\ \left(A/B\right)^2 - \mathcal{C}/B \ge 0 \\\ A = \left(-\frac{Z}{Z\_1} + \frac{Z\_0}{Z}B\_c^2 + \frac{Z}{Z\_1}\right)\cos\beta\_0 L\_0 + \left(\frac{Z\_0}{Z\_0}B\_c^2 + \frac{Z\_0}{Z\_1}B\_c\right)\sin\beta\_0 L\_0 \\\ B = -2B\_c\cos\beta\_0 L\_0 + \left(\frac{Z\_1^2}{Z\_0^2}B\_c^2 - \frac{ZZ\_0}{Z\_1^2} + \frac{Z\_1^2}{Z\_0^2}\right)\sin\beta\_0 L\_0 \\\ \mathcal{C} = 2B\_c\cos\beta\_0 L\_0 + \left(\frac{Z}{Z\_0} - \frac{Z\_0}{Z}B\_c^2 - \frac{Z\_0}{Z}\right)\sin\beta\_0 L\_0 \end{cases} \tag{6}$$

According to the frequency of the pillbox window, the WR-10 (Waveguide name of EIA standard) standard rectangular window was selected. The three structural parameters of the symmetrical pillbox window, *L*0, *L*1, and *R*0, need to satisfy Equation (6). When the center frequency of the design band is 92.5 GHz, the three parameters have infinitely many solutions that satisfy the equation. To obtain the ideal parameter structure, the values of the three structural parameters need to be limited. Considering the sealing and mechanical strength of the window, the dielectric sheet needs to have a larger thickness,

window.

**3. Experiment Results** 

(CEYAER AV3672C) is shown in Figure 6.

asymmetric pillbox window.

and considering the matching of the window system, the window sheet needs to be thinner. Based on the above reasoning, *L*<sup>0</sup> is between one-half of the waveguide wavelength (0.55 mm) and one-quarter of the waveguide wavelength (0.275 mm) (0.275 mm ≤ *L*<sup>0</sup> ≤ 0.55 mm). The diameter of the circular waveguide is too large, the high-order mode cannot be cut off, and the diameter of the window is too small, which will narrow the matching bandwidth. The diameter of the general box-shaped window is taken from the diagonal of the rectangular waveguide *D* = √ *a* <sup>2</sup> + *b* 2 . Based on the bandwidth requirements of the pillbox window in this paper, the diameter of the window can be slightly larger than *D*, and the scanning range can be set as *L*<sup>0</sup> ≤ *L*<sup>1</sup> ≤ 1 mm. The value ranges of the three parameters were combined to find the solution set that satisfies Equation (6). The transmission and reflections of each set of structural parameter values can be obtained by Equation (5); the parameter group with a larger bandwidth and reflection less than −10 dB was selected as shown in Table 2.


**Table 2.** Structural parameters of the pillbox windows.

The reflection value by the equivalent circuit theory and the transmission characteristics in CST are shown in Figure 3. Except for the frequency deviation of 4 GHz, the two reflection curves have good consistency. This shows that the equivalent circuit theory is reasonable as a preliminary design tool. The equivalent circuit theory is not a very accurate mathematical model, and further optimization should rely on CST three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic simulation software. The structural parameters were simulated and optimized with the goal of wider transmission bandwidth and smaller transmission loss. The structural parameters of the asymmetric pillbox window were optimized based on the parameters of the symmetrical-type window. Considering the machining accuracy and assembly difficulty, the diameter difference of the two circular waveguides was taken as 0.1 mm. The structural parameters are shown in Table *Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2. 6 of 11

**Figure 3.** The optimized (**a**) *S*11 values of pillbox windows and (**b**) *S*21 values of pillbox windows. **Figure 3.** The optimized (**a**) *S*<sup>11</sup> values of pillbox windows and (**b**) *S*<sup>21</sup> values of pillbox windows.

The simulation-optimized structural model is shown in Figure 4. For input mode TE10, the transmission characteristics are shown in Figure 3. In the frequency range of 78–110 GHz, the *S*<sup>21</sup> The simulation-optimized structural model is shown in Figure 4. For input mode TE10, the transmission characteristics are shown in Figure 3. In the frequency range of 78–110 GHz,

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 4.** Simulation model of the (**a**) symmetrical pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetrical pillbox

According to the optimized structural parameters (Table 2), two box-type windows were processed and assembled, as shown in Figure 5. The testing process in the vector network analyzer

**Figure 5.** The pillbox windows after brazing assembly: (**a**) symmetric pillbox window and (**b**)

the *S*<sup>21</sup> values of the two designs were greater than −0.5 dB; the maximum transmission loss of the symmetric pillbox window was −0.23 dB, while that of the asymmetric type was −0.47 dB. transmission characteristics are shown in Figure 3. In the frequency range of 78–110 GHz, the *S*<sup>21</sup> values of the two designs were greater than −0.5 dB; the maximum transmission loss of the symmetric pillbox window was −0.23 dB, while that of the asymmetric type was −0.47 dB.

symmetric pillbox window was −0.23 dB, while that of the asymmetric type was −0.47 dB.

The simulation-optimized structural model is shown in Figure 4. For input mode TE10, the

The simulation-optimized structural model is shown in Figure 4. For input mode TE10, the transmission characteristics are shown in Figure 3. In the frequency range of 78–110 GHz, the *S*<sup>21</sup>

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 3.** The optimized (**a**) *S*11 values of pillbox windows and (**b**) *S*21 values of pillbox windows.

(**a**) (**b**)

**Figure 3.** The optimized (**a**) *S*11 values of pillbox windows and (**b**) *S*21 values of pillbox windows.

*Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 11

*Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 11

**Figure 4.** Simulation model of the (**a**) symmetrical pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetrical pillbox **Figure 4.** Simulation model of the (**a**) symmetrical pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetrical pillbox window. window.

#### window. **3. Experiment Results 3. Experiment Results**

*Electronics* 

**3. Experiment Results**  According to the optimized structural parameters (Table 2), two box-type windows were processed and assembled, as shown in Figure 5. The testing process in the vector network analyzer According to the optimized structural parameters (Table 2), two box-type windows were processed and assembled, as shown in Figure 5. The testing process in the vector network analyzer (CEYAER AV3672C) is shown in Figure 6. According to the optimized structural parameters (Table 2), two box-type windows were processed and assembled, as shown in Figure 5. The testing process in the vector network analyzer (CEYAER AV3672C) is shown in Figure 6.

**Figure 5.** The pillbox windows after brazing assembly: (**a**) symmetric pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetric pillbox window. **Figure 5.** The pillbox windows after brazing assembly: (**a**) symmetric pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetric pillbox window. **Figure 5.** The pillbox windows after brazing assembly: (**a**) symmetric pillbox window and (**b**) asymmetric pillbox window. **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11

**Figure 6.** Experimental testing of the pillbox windows. **Figure 6.** Experimental testing of the pillbox windows.

The experimental results of the symmetrical box window in the early stage were not ideal. The error analysis method in the literature [6] was used to analyze the experimental results. Based on the The experimental results of the symmetrical box window in the early stage were not ideal. The error analysis method in the literature [6] was used to analyze the experimental results. Based on the analysis results, the experimental program was revised. Because the value of *S*<sup>11</sup> was small and its

structural parameter of the window. Some of the analysis results are shown in Figure 7, and the

(**a**) (**b**)

**Figure 7.** Measurement results and simulation analysis of the symmetric window: (**a**) *S*11 values of

the measurement result and the design value, which is mainly caused by the tolerance of *L*1 and *L*2. The main reason is that the position of the dielectric sheet shifted during the welding process. This shift is random due to the purely manual operation of welding fixture assembly and solder filling. The test results of multiple rounds of modification of the welding fixture and assembly scheme showed that this randomness is inevitable. To reduce the influence of welding on the test process, the test plan was modified. After the windows were welded to the circular waveguide, the circular waveguides on both sides were measured and reprocessed to ensure that the values of *L*1 and *L*<sup>2</sup> were within the tolerance range. The test process is shown in Figure 8. This method can effectively reduce the influence of welding on *L*<sup>1</sup> and *L*2. The final test result is shown in Figure 9. By error simulation analysis of the test results, the calculation tolerance of each structural parameter was obtained, shown in Table 3. The transmission parameter |*S*21| was close to 1 dB and the reflection

As shown in Figure 7, the errors of *R*1, *R*2, and *L*0 made lesser contributions to the deviation of

calculated tolerance of the window is shown in Table 3.

the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window.

parameter |*S*11| was close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz.

influence on the change of the structural parameters of the window system was not obvious enough, the more sensitive *S*<sup>21</sup> was selected as the optimization target, and the random error was the structural parameter of the window. Some of the analysis results are shown in Figure 7, and the calculated tolerance of the window is shown in Table 3. influence on the change of the structural parameters of the window system was not obvious enough, the more sensitive *S*21 was selected as the optimization target, and the random error was the structural parameter of the window. Some of the analysis results are shown in Figure 7, and the calculated tolerance of the window is shown in Table 3.

**Figure 6.** Experimental testing of the pillbox windows.

error analysis method in the literature [6] was used to analyze the experimental results. Based on the analysis results, the experimental program was revised. Because the value of *S*11 was small and its

*Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11

**Figure 7.** Measurement results and simulation analysis of the symmetric window: (**a**) *S*11 values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window. **Figure 7.** Measurement results and simulation analysis of the symmetric window: (**a**) *S*<sup>11</sup> values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*<sup>21</sup> values of the pillbox window.


showed that this randomness is inevitable. To reduce the influence of welding on the test process, <sup>1</sup> A negative sign indicates that the experimental size estimated by the simulation was smaller than the design size.

the test plan was modified. After the windows were welded to the circular waveguide, the circular waveguides on both sides were measured and reprocessed to ensure that the values of *L*1 and *L*<sup>2</sup> were within the tolerance range. The test process is shown in Figure 8. This method can effectively reduce the influence of welding on *L*<sup>1</sup> and *L*2. The final test result is shown in Figure 9. By error simulation analysis of the test results, the calculation tolerance of each structural parameter was obtained, shown in Table 3. The transmission parameter |*S*21| was close to 1 dB and the reflection parameter |*S*11| was close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. As shown in Figure 7, the errors of *R*1, *R*2, and *L*<sup>0</sup> made lesser contributions to the deviation of the measurement result and the design value, which is mainly caused by the tolerance of *L*<sup>1</sup> and *L*2. The main reason is that the position of the dielectric sheet shifted during the welding process. This shift is random due to the purely manual operation of welding fixture assembly and solder filling. The test results of multiple rounds of modification of the welding fixture and assembly scheme showed that this randomness is inevitable. To reduce the influence of welding on the test process, the test plan was modified. After the windows were welded to the circular waveguide, the circular waveguides on both sides were measured and reprocessed to ensure that the values of *L*<sup>1</sup> and *L*<sup>2</sup> were within the tolerance range. The test process is shown in Figure 8. This method can effectively reduce the influence of welding on *L*<sup>1</sup> and *L*2. The final test result is shown in Figure 9. By error simulation analysis of the test results, the calculation tolerance of each structural parameter was obtained, shown in Table 3. The transmission parameter |*S*21| was close to 1 dB and the reflection parameter |*S*11| was close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. *Electronics* **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 11

**Figure 8.** The test flow chart for the symmetric pillbox window. **Figure 8.** The test flow chart for the symmetric pillbox window.

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 9.** The measurement results of the symmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*11 values of the pillbox

**Table 3.** The calculation tolerance of the pillbox window. **Variable Name** *L***0** *L***1** *L***2** *R***0** *R***1** *R***<sup>2</sup>** Figure 7 −0.013 mm 1 0.06 mm −0.08 mm 0 mm 0.02 mm 0.02 mm Figure 9 0.02 mm −0.02 mm −0.05 mm −0.04 mm 0.01 mm 0.01 mm 1 A negative sign indicates that the experimental size estimated by the simulation was smaller than

The asymmetric pillbox window can avoid the problems of the symmetric pillbox window in the testing. In asymmetric pillbox window testing, the window can be roughly tested before brazing to reduce the error of structural parameters. The test process of the asymmetric window is shown in Figure 10. A comparison between the two measured results and the simulation is shown in Figure 11. The frequency band of the unwelded pill window with a transmission parameter close to 0.5 dB covers 76–109.5 GHz, except for two frequency points at 87.99 GHz and 103.15 GHz. At the frequency of 87.99 GHz, *S*21 is decreased when *S*11 is increased due to reflection. At the frequency of 103.15 GHz, both *S*11 and *S*21 are decreased, which may be caused by spurious modes. Compared to the test results of the unwelded pill window, the measurement results add a spurious mode point at 107.4 GHz. The two test results have a similar frequency offset—about 2 GHz—compared to the

window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window.

the design size.

calculation results.

**Figure 8.** The test flow chart for the symmetric pillbox window.

**Figure 9.** The measurement results of the symmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*11 values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window. **Figure 9.** The measurement results of the symmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*<sup>11</sup> values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*<sup>21</sup> values of the pillbox window.

**Table 3.** The calculation tolerance of the pillbox window. **Variable Name** *L***0** *L***1** *L***2** *R***0** *R***1** *R***<sup>2</sup>** Figure 7 −0.013 mm 1 0.06 mm −0.08 mm 0 mm 0.02 mm 0.02 mm Figure 9 0.02 mm −0.02 mm −0.05 mm −0.04 mm 0.01 mm 0.01 mm 1 A negative sign indicates that the experimental size estimated by the simulation was smaller than the design size. The asymmetric pillbox window can avoid the problems of the symmetric pillbox window in the testing. In asymmetric pillbox window testing, the window can be roughly tested before brazing to reduce the error of structural parameters. The test process of the asymmetric window is shown in Figure 10. A comparison between the two measured results and the simulation is shown in Figure The asymmetric pillbox window can avoid the problems of the symmetric pillbox window in the testing. In asymmetric pillbox window testing, the window can be roughly tested before brazing to reduce the error of structural parameters. The test process of the asymmetric window is shown in Figure 10. A comparison between the two measured results and the simulation is shown in Figure 11. The frequency band of the unwelded pill window with a transmission parameter close to 0.5 dB covers 76–109.5 GHz, except for two frequency points at 87.99 GHz and 103.15 GHz. At the frequency of 87.99 GHz, *S*<sup>21</sup> is decreased when *S*<sup>11</sup> is increased due to reflection. At the frequency of 103.15 GHz, both *S*<sup>11</sup> and *S*<sup>21</sup> are decreased, which may be caused by spurious modes. Compared to the test results of the unwelded pill window, the measurement results add a spurious mode point at 107.4 GHz. The two *Electronics*  test results have a similar frequency o **2020**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW ffset—about 2 GHz—compared to the calculation results. 9 of 11

**Figure 10** The test flow chart for the asymmetric pillbox window. **Figure 10.** The test flow chart for the asymmetric pillbox window.

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 11.** The measurement results of the asymmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*11 values of the pillbox

In this paper, we report the design, manufacture, and testing of two kinds of wide-band low-loss pillbox windows for W-band vacuum electronic devices. After the experiments, analysis, and improvement, the final results for the symmetrical window were transmission parameter |*S*21| close to 1 dB and reflection parameter |*S*11| close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. Based on the experimental testing of the symmetrical-type window and the analysis of the experimental results, the asymmetrical pillbox window can reduce the errors caused by the welding process and the assembly process by using an asymmetric circular waveguide to fix the sapphire medium. The test results showed that the transmission parameter |*S*21| was <1 dB in the frequency range of 76–109.5 GHz, covering the W-band. Our test data and simulation results show that systematic tuning of the asymmetric window after fabrication can achieve broadband transmission

Both design methods can reduce the errors caused by welding and experimental processing, and both have successfully produced low-loss, wide-band box windows. The experimental methods in these two testing processes can be applied to the production of box-shaped windows in the

window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window.

**4. Summary** 

close to the ideal design.

terahertz band.

**Figure 10** The test flow chart for the asymmetric pillbox window.

**Figure 11.** The measurement results of the asymmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*11 values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*21 values of the pillbox window. **Figure 11.** The measurement results of the asymmetric pillbox window: (**a**) *S*<sup>11</sup> values of the pillbox window; (**b**) *S*<sup>21</sup> values of the pillbox window.

#### **4. Summary 4. Summary**

In this paper, we report the design, manufacture, and testing of two kinds of wide-band low-loss pillbox windows for W-band vacuum electronic devices. After the experiments, analysis, and improvement, the final results for the symmetrical window were transmission parameter |*S*21| close to 1 dB and reflection parameter |*S*11| close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. Based on the experimental testing of the symmetrical-type window and the analysis of the experimental results, the asymmetrical pillbox window can reduce the errors caused by the welding process and the assembly process by using an asymmetric circular waveguide to fix the sapphire medium. The test results showed that the transmission parameter |*S*21| was <1 dB in the frequency range of 76–109.5 GHz, covering the W-band. Our test data and simulation results show that systematic tuning of the asymmetric window after fabrication can achieve broadband transmission In this paper, we report the design, manufacture, and testing of two kinds of wide-band low-loss pillbox windows for W-band vacuum electronic devices. After the experiments, analysis, and improvement, the final results for the symmetrical window were transmission parameter |*S*21| close to 1 dB and reflection parameter |*S*11| close to 10 dB in the frequency range of 77–110 GHz. Based on the experimental testing of the symmetrical-type window and the analysis of the experimental results, the asymmetrical pillbox window can reduce the errors caused by the welding process and the assembly process by using an asymmetric circular waveguide to fix the sapphire medium. The test results showed that the transmission parameter |*S*21| was <1 dB in the frequency range of 76–109.5 GHz, covering the W-band. Our test data and simulation results show that systematic tuning of the asymmetric window after fabrication can achieve broadband transmission close to the ideal design.

close to the ideal design. Both design methods can reduce the errors caused by welding and experimental processing, and both have successfully produced low-loss, wide-band box windows. The experimental methods in these two testing processes can be applied to the production of box-shaped windows in the terahertz band. Both design methods can reduce the errors caused by welding and experimental processing, and both have successfully produced low-loss, wide-band box windows. The experimental methods in these two testing processes can be applied to the production of box-shaped windows in the terahertz band.

 **Author Contributions:** T.Y. and W.F. contributed to the overall study design, analysis, computer simulation, and writing of the manuscript; X.G., D.L., J.X., C.Z., X.Y. and Y.Y. provided technical support and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61971097, in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under 2019YFA0210202, in part by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program under Grant 2018HH0136, and in part by the Terahertz Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Foundation under Grant THZSC201801.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors gratefully acknowledge Yin Huang and Weirong Deng for their kind assistance on engineering design and assembling.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**


**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

*Article*
