*3.2. Quality Assessment*

Results from the quality assessment are depicted in Table 2. With an average score of 30.1/40, the studies were generally of high quality (one study was categorized as having moderate quality, six studies were categorized as having high quality, and two studies were categorized as having very high methodological quality). On average, the lowest scores (with also the biggest spread) were recorded in the sampling category, which relates to reporting of the sampling method, sample size, and recruitment protocols.


**Table 2.** Results of the CCAT quality assessment.

Note. Categorization of methodological quality of papers is noted in superscript ranging from moderate (M) to high (H) and very high (VH).
