**5. Conclusions**

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results show that the computer aided SNT was less reliable than FT and the use of SNT in the clinic should be suspended until further research is conducted. Specifically, coronal and angular deviations between the computer aided SNT and FT study groups did not show statistically significant differences; however, statistically significant differences were observed between the apical deviation of the SNT and FT study groups.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, E.R.D., N.Z.L.T. and Á.Z.-M., design, D.G.M.; data acquisition, M.B.P.; formal analysis, A.G.C.; performed all statistical analyses, Á.Z.-M. and F.A.S.; review and editing, S.H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Data available on request due to restrictions, e.g., privacy or ethical.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors would like to express their thanks to Carmen Caballero for his advice, guidance and help during this study.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.
