**5. Conclusions**

The goal of this paper is to apply the improved code for the evaluation of the radiative fluxes from the atmosphere to the Earth on the basis of the model of [1]. In these evaluations, we use the range of frequencies up to 2600 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in contrast to the previous calculations [1], where this range was restricted by 1200 cm<sup>−</sup>1. Besides this difference, we use now various versions of the energetic balance of the Earth and its atmosphere (see Table 1), and the difference in radiative parameters due to various versions of the Earth's energetic balance may be considered an error of the results. Nevertheless, the cloud boundary altitude *hcl*, as one of basic parameters of the model under consideration, according to [1], is *hcl* = 4.3 km, whereas from Table 1, the average altitude of the cloud boundary is *hcl* = 4.6 km, i.e., these values coincide within the accuracy of these evaluations.

Because carbon dioxide molecules do not absorb in the additional spectrum range between 1200 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and 2600 cm<sup>−</sup>1, the radiative parameters due to *CO*2 molecules are close in these evaluations and in the previous one. In particular, the variation in radiative fluxes as a result of the change in the carbon dioxide amount in the atmosphere for these calculations are close. In this evaluation as well as previous evaluations, we have a contradiction with the results of climatological models in the analysis of the Earth's greenhouse effect, according to which the increase in the global temperature differs by five times. We show [51,52], so the large difference results from ignoring, in climatological models, the Kirchhoff law [50], according to which radiators are simultaneously the absorbers. In this case, we take the change in the radiative flux created by *CO*2 molecules as the change of the total radiative flux.

Note the restrictions by the frequency range up to 1200 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in the previous calculations [1]; we thus assume that the atmosphere is transparent for larger frequencies, and the emission at larger frequencies is determined by clouds. However, according to the HITRAN data bank, water molecules absorb effectively in the enlarged frequency range. As a result, the derivative (22) is larger than that according to [1]. We proved early (for example, [1]) that atmospheric *CO*2 molecules are not the main radiator of the atmosphere. From these evaluations, it follows that water molecules in the atmosphere may be responsible for the observed heating of the Earth.

**Author Contributions:** Writing—original draft, B.M.S. and D.A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.
