*Article* **Effect of Sb and Zn Addition on the Microstructures and Tensile Properties of Sn–Bi-Based Alloys**

**Akira Yamauchi \* and Masashi Kurose**

National Institute of Technology, Gunma College, 580 Toriba-machi, Maebashi 371-8530, Japan; kurose@gunma-ct.ac.jp

**\*** Correspondence: ayana@gunma-ct.ac.jp

**Abstract:** The tensile behavior of Sn–Bi–Cu and Sn–Bi–Ni alloys has been widely investigated. Reportedly, the addition of small amounts of a third element can refine the microstructures of the eutectic Sn-58mass% Bi solder and improve its ductility. However, the superplasticity mechanism of Sn-based alloys has not been clearly established. Therefore, in this study, the effects of Sb and Zn addition on the microstructures and tensile properties of Sn–Bi-based alloys were investigated. The alloys were subjected to tensile tests under various strain rates and temperatures. We found that Znand Sb-added Sn–Bi-based alloys demonstrated superplastic deformation at high temperatures and low strain rates. Sb addition significantly affected the elongation of the Sn–Bi–Sb alloys because the metal dissolves in both the primary Sn phase and the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix. The segregation of Zn and formation of needle-like Zn particles at the eutectic Sn–Bi phase boundary affected the superplastic deformation of the alloys. The deformation of the Sn–40Bi-based alloys at high temperatures and low strain rates led to dynamic recovery, dynamic recrystallization, and/or grain boundary slip because of the accumulation of voids.

**Keywords:** Sn–Bi-based alloy; superplasticity; tensile property; deformation; low-melting-point solder

#### **1. Introduction**

The use of Pb and Pb-containing products has been banned in many countries because of their harmful effects on the human body and environment [1,2]. Therefore, several types of Pb-free solder alloys, including Sn-58mass%Bi (412 K) [3], Sn-9mass%Zn (471 K) [4], Sn-0.7mass%Cu (500 K) [5], Sn-3.5mass%Ag (494 K) [6], Sn-70mass%Au (553 K) [7], Sn-35mass%Bi-1mass%Ag (460 K) [8], Sn-8mass%Zn-3mass%Bi (461 K) [9], and Sn-3mass%– 0.5mass%Cu (490 K) [10] systems, have been developed to replace Sn-37mass%Pb (456 K) systems in the electronic packaging industries. For example, Sn-3.0mass% Ag-0.5mass% Cu (SAC305), a Pb-free solder, was developed as a substitute for Sn–Pb solder because of its high strength and joint reliability. However, SAC305 is unsuitable for some low-heatresistance components because its melting temperature, at approximately 494 K, is higher than that of the Sn–Pb eutectic solder (456 K).

Eutectic Sn-58mass% Bi alloy, which has a low melting temperature of 412 K, presents several advantages over other types of solders in low-temperature soldering applications, because it can protect electronic devices from thermal damage under high reflow temperatures. The Sn–Bi Pb-free solder alloys are characterized by a relatively high tensile strength and good creep resistance [11–13]. However, because Sn–Bi-based solders also show frangibility and poor ductility, their applications in the packaging industry are limited [14,15].

Recently, several research groups have focused on manufacturing new alloys doped with micro-/nanometer-sized particles, e.g., Ni, Fe, Zn, Ag, Al, ZrO2, Al2O3, TiO2, etc., to enhance the mechanical properties and wettability of Pb-free solders for green electronic devices [16–22]. Takao et al. [23], for instance, reported that Sn–Bi and Sn–Bi–Cu alloys exhibit superplasticity. However, the superplasticity mechanism of Sn-based alloys has not

**Citation:** Yamauchi, A.; Kurose, M. Effect of Sb and Zn Addition on the Microstructures and Tensile Properties of Sn–Bi-Based Alloys. *Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ma15030884

Academic Editors: Gábor Harsányi, Yoshikazu Todaka, Hideyuki Kanematsu and Takaya Sato

Received: 2 December 2021 Accepted: 19 January 2022 Published: 24 January 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

been clearly established. In previous studies, the tensile behavior of Sn–Bi–Cu and Sn–Bi– Ni alloys has been investigated, and the corresponding results indicated that these alloys show superplasticity at high temperatures and low strain rates [24,25]. Cu and Ni occupy a small solid-solution region in the Sn phase diagram and easily form an intermetallic compound with the metal. However, the effect of elements occupying large solid-solution regions in the phase diagrams of Sn or Bi on the superplastic deformation of the resultant alloy has not yet been elucidated. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of Sb and Zn addition on the microstructures and tensile behavior of Sn-40mass% Bi alloys. Tensile tests were then performed under various temperatures and strain rates to examine the superplastic behavior of the modified alloys. To confirm the superplastic deformation, the concentration of the added element and evolution of microstructures were also evaluated. Bi–Ni alloys has been investigated, and the corresponding results indicated that these alloys show superplasticity at high temperatures and low strain rates [24,25]. Cu and Ni occupy a small solid-solution region in the Sn phase diagram and easily form an intermetallic compound with the metal. However, the effect of elements occupying large solidsolution regions in the phase diagrams of Sn or Bi on the superplastic deformation of the resultant alloy has not yet been elucidated. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of Sb and Zn addition on the microstructures and tensile behavior of Sn-40mass% Bi alloys. Tensile tests were then performed under various temperatures and strain rates to examine the superplastic behavior of the modified alloys. To confirm the superplastic deformation, the concentration of the added element and evolution of microstructures were also evaluated.

enhance the mechanical properties and wettability of Pb-free solders for green electronic devices [16–22]. Takao et al. [23], for instance, reported that Sn–Bi and Sn–Bi–Cu alloys exhibit superplasticity. However, the superplasticity mechanism of Sn-based alloys has not been clearly established. In previous studies, the tensile behavior of Sn–Bi–Cu and Sn–

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 2 of 11

#### **2. Materials and Methods 2. Materials and Methods**

Sn, Sn-57mass% Bi, Sn-5mass% Sb, and Sn-9mass% Zn (purity, 99.5 mass%) ingot bars were used to synthesize Sn-40mass% Bi-X mass% Sb (X = 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0) and Sn-40mass% Bi-Y mass% Zn (Y = 0.1, 1.0, and 3.0) (the compositional unit "mass%" is omitted hereafter for convenience). Appropriate amounts of the initial ingots were weighed, placed in an Al2O<sup>3</sup> crucible, fused in an electric furnace at 673 K, and then left to solidify for 24 h to achieve a homogeneous composition. The fused ingots were then melted at 653 K, cast in an Al mold, and cooled at a rate of approximately 15 K·min−<sup>1</sup> to form a cylindrical ingot. Finally, dog-bone-type specimens (Figure 1) were machined from the cylindrical Sn-40Bi-based alloy ingots for the tensile tests. Sn, Sn-57mass% Bi, Sn-5mass% Sb, and Sn-9mass% Zn (purity, 99.5 mass%) ingot bars were used to synthesize Sn-40mass% Bi-X mass% Sb (X = 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0) and Sn-40mass% Bi-Y mass% Zn (Y = 0.1, 1.0, and 3.0) (the compositional unit "mass%" is omitted hereafter for convenience). Appropriate amounts of the initial ingots were weighed, placed in an Al2O3 crucible, fused in an electric furnace at 673 K, and then left to solidify for 24 h to achieve a homogeneous composition. The fused ingots were then melted at 653 K, cast in an Al mold, and cooled at a rate of approximately 15 K·min−1 to form a cylindrical ingot. Finally, dog-bone-type specimens (Figure 1) were machined from the cylindrical Sn-40Bi-based alloy ingots for the tensile tests.

**Figure 1.** Schematic of the tensile test specimen (unit: mm), adapted from [25]. **Figure 1.** Schematic of the tensile test specimen (unit: mm), adapted from [25].

The tensile tests were performed on a universal material testing machine at strain rates of 5.25 × 10−2, 5.25 × 10−3, and 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. Each test piece was exposed to various temperatures of 298, 313, 333, and 353 K in a controlled-atmosphere furnace until complete fracture occurred. In this paper, measurements obtained over three trials under each The tensile tests were performed on a universal material testing machine at strain rates of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>2</sup> , 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>3</sup> , and 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 . Each test piece was exposed to various temperatures of 298, 313, 333, and 353 K in a controlled-atmosphere furnace until complete fracture occurred. In this paper, measurements obtained over three trials under each set of conditions were statistically averaged and reported as the tensile test results.

set of conditions were statistically averaged and reported as the tensile test results. Specimens were embedded in resin and cut for microstructural observation before and after the tensile testing. The surfaces of the specimens were polished first with SiC papers of up to 1500 grit and then with a 1 μm diamond abrasive and colloidal silica to achieve a mirror-like finish. The cross-sectional and vertical-sectional microstructures and fracture surfaces of the specimens were observed using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The crystal orientations were determined by electron Specimens were embedded in resin and cut for microstructural observation before and after the tensile testing. The surfaces of the specimens were polished first with SiC papers of up to 1500 grit and then with a 1 µm diamond abrasive and colloidal silica to achieve a mirror-like finish. The cross-sectional and vertical-sectional microstructuresand fracture surfaces of the specimens were observed using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The crystal orientations were determined by electron backscatter diffraction analysis, and the elemental distributions were evaluated by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The solidus and liquidus temperatures of the solder alloys were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

#### **3. Results and Discussion** Figure 4 shows the microstructures of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys. The EPMA results pre-Figure 4 shows the microstructures of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys. The EPMA results pre-

**3. Results and Discussion** 

**3. Results and Discussion**

*3.1. Microstructures* 

*3.1. Microstructures* 

#### *3.1. Microstructures* sented in Figure 5 reveal that the alloys consist of a gray β-Sn phase, a eutectic Sn–Bi sented in Figure 5 reveal that the alloys consist of a gray β-Sn phase, a eutectic Sn–Bi

Figure 2 shows the backscattered electron (BSE) images of the Sn–Bi alloys containing various amounts of Sb. In the images, the dark regions represent the solidified β-Sn matrix, and the bright regions reflect the Bi phase dispersed in the β-Sn matrix. The Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys show a hypoeutectic structure composed of primary Sn dendrites with an average diameter of ~20 µm and eutectic Sn–Bi phases with an average diameter of ~5 µm. The addition of Sb to the Sn-40Bi alloys only slightly affected the grain size of the primary Sn phase and the overall alloy microstructure. EPMA of the alloys (Figure 3) revealed that the Sb atoms preferentially exist in the primary Sn phase. phase, and a needle-like Zn-rich phase. A significant increase in the Zn-rich phases with increasing Zn concentration was observed. The EPMA further confirmed that the Zn atoms preferentially existed in the Bi phase of the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix. This result agrees with those of Mokhtari et al. [26] and Hirata et al. [27]. The grain size of the primary Sn phase of Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, shown in Figure 4b, was larger than that of the primary Sn phase of the other Sn–Bi–Zn alloys. The EPMA of the Zn-rich phase showed that the phases were mainly composed of Zn, and the Zn mass percentage increased to more than 50%, as shown in Figure 5b,c. phase, and a needle-like Zn-rich phase. A significant increase in the Zn-rich phases with increasing Zn concentration was observed. The EPMA further confirmed that the Zn atoms preferentially existed in the Bi phase of the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix. This result agrees with those of Mokhtari et al. [26] and Hirata et al. [27]. The grain size of the primary Sn phase of Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, shown in Figure 4b, was larger than that of the primary Sn phase of the other Sn–Bi–Zn alloys. The EPMA of the Zn-rich phase showed that the phases were mainly composed of Zn, and the Zn mass percentage increased to more than 50%, as shown in Figure 5b,c.

concentration also led to the dissolution of Sb atoms in the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix.

concentration also led to the dissolution of Sb atoms in the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix.

backscatter diffraction analysis, and the elemental distributions were evaluated by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The solidus and liquidus temperatures of the solder

backscatter diffraction analysis, and the elemental distributions were evaluated by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The solidus and liquidus temperatures of the solder

Figure 2 shows the backscattered electron (BSE) images of the Sn–Bi alloys containing various amounts of Sb. In the images, the dark regions represent the solidified β-Sn matrix, and the bright regions reflect the Bi phase dispersed in the β-Sn matrix. The Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys show a hypoeutectic structure composed of primary Sn dendrites with an average diameter of ~20 μm and eutectic Sn–Bi phases with an average diameter of ~5 μm. The addition of Sb to the Sn-40Bi alloys only slightly affected the grain size of the primary Sn phase and the overall alloy microstructure. EPMA of the alloys (Figure 3) revealed that

Figure 2 shows the backscattered electron (BSE) images of the Sn–Bi alloys containing various amounts of Sb. In the images, the dark regions represent the solidified β-Sn matrix, and the bright regions reflect the Bi phase dispersed in the β-Sn matrix. The Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys show a hypoeutectic structure composed of primary Sn dendrites with an average diameter of ~20 μm and eutectic Sn–Bi phases with an average diameter of ~5 μm. The addition of Sb to the Sn-40Bi alloys only slightly affected the grain size of the primary Sn phase and the overall alloy microstructure. EPMA of the alloys (Figure 3) revealed that

The results of the quantitative EPMA are summarized in Table 1. Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb showed a relatively high Sb concentration (2.4 mass%), as well as a preferential segregation of the Sb atoms in the primary Sn phase (Figure 3c). Further, an increase in the Sb

The results of the quantitative EPMA are summarized in Table 1. Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb showed a relatively high Sb concentration (2.4 mass%), as well as a preferential segregation of the Sb atoms in the primary Sn phase (Figure 3c). Further, an increase in the Sb

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 3 of 11

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 3 of 11

the Sb atoms preferentially exist in the primary Sn phase.

the Sb atoms preferentially exist in the primary Sn phase.

alloys were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

alloys were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

**Figure 2.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb. **Figure 2.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb. **Figure 2.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb.

**Figure 3.** EPMA mapping images of Sb in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb. **Figure 3.** EPMA mapping images of Sb in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb. **Figure 3.** EPMA mapping images of Sb in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb.

The results of the quantitative EPMA are summarized in Table 1. Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb showed a relatively high Sb concentration (2.4 mass%), as well as a preferential segregation of the Sb atoms in the primary Sn phase (Figure 3c). Further, an increase in the Sb concentration also led to the dissolution of Sb atoms in the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix.



Figure 4 shows the microstructures of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys. The EPMA results presented in Figure 5 reveal that the alloys consist of a gray β-Sn phase, a eutectic Sn–Bi phase, and a needle-like Zn-rich phase. A significant increase in the Zn-rich phases with increasing Zn concentration was observed. The EPMA further confirmed that the Zn atoms preferentially existed in the Bi phase of the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix. This result agrees with those of Mokhtari et al. [26] and Hirata et al. [27]. The grain size of the primary Sn phase of Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, shown in Figure 4b, was larger than that of the primary Sn phase of the other Sn–Bi–Zn alloys. The EPMA of the Zn-rich phase showed that the phases were mainly composed of Zn, and the Zn mass percentage increased to more than 50%, as shown in Figure 5b,c. **Specimen Sb Concentration (Mass %) Primary Sn Phase Eutectic Sn–Bi Matrix**  Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb 0.09 0 Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb 1.0 0.16 Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb 2.4 0.41 **Specimen Sb Concentration (Mass %) Primary Sn Phase Eutectic Sn–Bi Matrix**  Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb 0.09 0 Sn-40Bi-0.5Sb 1.0 0.16 Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb 2.4 0.41

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 4 of 11

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 4 of 11

**Table 1.** EPMA results of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys.

**Table 1.** EPMA results of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys.

**Figure 4.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn. **Figure 4.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn. **Figure 4.** BSE images of (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn.

**Figure 5.** EPMA mapping images of Zn in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn. **Figure 5.** EPMA mapping images of Zn in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn. **Figure 5.** EPMA mapping images of Zn in (**a**) Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn, (**b**) Sn-40Bi-1.0Zn, and (**c**) Sn-40Bi-3.0Zn.

#### *3.2. Tensile Properties*

*3.2. Tensile Properties*  Figure 6 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb at various strain rates and temperatures (298 and 353 K). At 298 K, the alloy exhibited a nearly steady-state flow as the stress approached its yield strength. The tensile strength of the specimen decreased, whereas its elongation increased with the decreasing strain rate. The tensile behavior of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb did not reflect superplasticity at 298 K. At 353 K, the alloy exhibited a gradual decrease in tensile strength under strain rates of 5.25 × 10−2 and 5.25 × 10−3 s−1. The specimen fractured when the stress reached its yield strength. Under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1, the yield strength of the alloy exhibited an initial sharp decrease, followed by a more gradual decrease until rupture occurred. The greatest elongation of this specimen observed under the conditions of 353 K and 5.25 × 10−4 s−1 was 206%. Superplastic behavior is defined as the ability to withstand a strain of >200% [28,29]. Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb demonstrated *3.2. Tensile Properties*  Figure 6 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb at various strain rates and temperatures (298 and 353 K). At 298 K, the alloy exhibited a nearly steady-state flow as the stress approached its yield strength. The tensile strength of the specimen decreased, whereas its elongation increased with the decreasing strain rate. The tensile behavior of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb did not reflect superplasticity at 298 K. At 353 K, the alloy exhibited a gradual decrease in tensile strength under strain rates of 5.25 × 10−2 and 5.25 × 10−3 s−1. The specimen fractured when the stress reached its yield strength. Under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1, the yield strength of the alloy exhibited an initial sharp decrease, followed by a more gradual decrease until rupture occurred. The greatest elongation of this specimen observed under the conditions of 353 K and 5.25 × 10−4 s−1 was 206%. Superplastic behavior is defined as the ability to withstand a strain of >200% [28,29]. Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb demonstrated Figure 6 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb at various strain rates and temperatures (298 and 353 K). At 298 K, the alloy exhibited a nearly steady-state flow as the stress approached its yield strength. The tensile strength of the specimen decreased, whereas its elongation increased with the decreasing strain rate. The tensile behavior of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb did not reflect superplasticity at 298 K. At 353 K, the alloy exhibited a gradual decrease in tensile strength under strain rates of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>2</sup> and 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>3</sup> s −1 . The specimen fractured when the stress reached its yield strength. Under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 , the yield strength of the alloy exhibited an initial sharp decrease, followed by a more gradual decrease until rupture occurred. The greatest elongation of this specimen observed under the conditions of 353 K and 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was 206%. Superplastic behavior is defined as the ability to withstand a strain of >200% [28,29]. Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb demonstrated superplasticity at a temperature of 353 K and a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 .

superplasticity at a temperature of 353 K and a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. superplasticity at a temperature of 353 K and a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. In general, the stress–strain curves of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys are similar to those of Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu and Sn-40Bi-0.01Ni [24,25]. Figure 7 shows the stress–strain curves of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 . The highest tensile strength (45 MPa) under these conditions is observed in Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb. The tensile strength of the alloys decreases with increasing Sb concentration. Indeed, the tensile strength of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb, at 23 MPa, is only half of that of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 . Conversely, the elongation increases with the increasing Sb concentration. The maximum elongation of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb under the conditions of 353 K and 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 is no less than 900%, as illustrated in Figure 8. The specimens generally exhibited longer elongation, without necking, and chisel-point fractures as their fracture

(**a**)

mode. This result is obtained possibly because Sb is solid-solution not only in the primary Sn phase but also in the Bi phase. Therefore, in contrast to Cu and Ni, which are typically added in low amounts, a larger amount of Sb must be added to the alloy to achieve superplastic deformation with long elongation. The microstructural observations further indicated that the superplastic deformation is likely to occur in the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys, because the structures of the primary Sn phase and eutectic Sn–Bi matrix become finer as the Sb concentration increases. Figure 9 shows the fractograph of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb after the tensile test under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> at 298 and 353 K. At 298 K, the alloy displays a ductile fracture mode, whereas, at 353 K, it displays a chisel-point fracture mode. The area of the Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb alloy at 353 K was reduced by approximately 98%. Thus, the reduction in the area and elongation of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys increases with an increasing concentration of Sb. *Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 5 of 11 **Figure 6.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb under various strain rates at (**a**) 298 and (**b**) 353 K. In general, the stress–strain curves of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys are similar to those of Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu and Sn-40Bi-0.01Ni [24,25]. Figure 7 shows the stress–strain curves of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The highest tensile strength (45 MPa) under these conditions is observed in Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb. The tensile strength of the alloys decreases with increasing Sb concentration. Indeed, the tensile strength of Sn-40Bi-

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 5 of 11

**Figure 6.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb under various strain rates at (**a**) 298 and (**b**) 353 K. **Figure 6.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Sb under various strain rates at (**a**) 298 and (**b**) 353 K. and elongation of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys increases with an increasing concentration of Sb.

in the Bi phase. Therefore, in contrast to Cu and Ni, which are typically added in low **Figure 7.** Stress–strain curves of various Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup> **Figure 7.** Stress–strain curves of various Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 .

1.0Sb alloy at 353 K was reduced by approximately 98%. Thus, the reduction in the area and elongation of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys increases with an increasing concentration of Sb. **Figure 8.** Photographs of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb before and after the tensile testing at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup>4 s−1. **Figure 8.** Photographs of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb before and after the tensile testing at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 .

**Figure 7.** Stress–strain curves of various Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup>

Figure 10 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn at various temperatures under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The ductility of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn exhibited gradual improvements as the temperature increased. The specimen showed superplastic deformation at temperatures above 333 K and elongation of up to 630%. Furthermore, specimens with different Zn concentrations demonstrated large elongations at 333 and 353 K. The Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys show the same temperature and strain-rate dependences as the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 6); thus, the stress–strain curves in various conditions are omitted

**Figure 9.** Fractured surface of the Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb alloy after the tensile test under a strain rate of 5.25

**Figure 10.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1 at various tem-

Figure 11 shows the stress–strain curves of the various Sn-40Bi-Zn specimens at 333 K, under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The elongation of the alloys increased in the order of 1Zn < 3Zn < 0.1Zn, likely because their microstructures were modified by Zn addition

s<sup>−</sup>1.

peratures.

× 10<sup>−</sup>4 s−1 at (**a**) 298 K and (**b**) 353 K.

for this alloy in this paper.

rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup>4 s−1.

rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup>4 s−1.

**Figure 8.** Photographs of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb before and after the tensile testing at 353 K under a strain

**Figure 8.** Photographs of Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb before and after the tensile testing at 353 K under a strain

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 6 of 11

**Figure 9.** Fractured surface of the Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb alloy after the tensile test under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup>4 s−1 at (**a**) 298 K and (**b**) 353 K. **Figure 9.** Fractured surface of the Sn-40Bi-1.0Sb alloy after the tensile test under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> at (**a**) 298 K and (**b**) 353 K. under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The ductility of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn exhibited gradual improvements as the temperature increased. The specimen showed superplastic defor-

Figure 10 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn at various temperatures under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The ductility of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn exhibited gradual improvements as the temperature increased. The specimen showed superplastic deformation at temperatures above 333 K and elongation of up to 630%. Furthermore, specimens with different Zn concentrations demonstrated large elongations at 333 and 353 K. The Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys show the same temperature and strain-rate dependences as the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 6); thus, the stress–strain curves in various conditions are omitted for this alloy in this paper. Figure 10 shows the stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn at various temperatures under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 . The ductility of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn exhibited gradual improvements as the temperature increased. The specimen showed superplastic deformation at temperatures above 333 K and elongation of up to 630%. Furthermore, specimens with different Zn concentrations demonstrated large elongations at 333 and 353 K. The Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys show the same temperature and strain-rate dependences as the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 6); thus, the stress–strain curves in various conditions are omitted for this alloy in this paper. mation at temperatures above 333 K and elongation of up to 630%. Furthermore, specimens with different Zn concentrations demonstrated large elongations at 333 and 353 K. The Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys show the same temperature and strain-rate dependences as the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 6); thus, the stress–strain curves in various conditions are omitted for this alloy in this paper.

Figure 11 shows the stress–strain curves of the various Sn-40Bi-Zn specimens at 333 K, under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The elongation of the alloys increased in the order **Figure 10.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1 at various temperatures. **Figure 10.** Stress–strain curves of Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> at various temperatures.

of 1Zn < 3Zn < 0.1Zn, likely because their microstructures were modified by Zn addition Figure 11 shows the stress–strain curves of the various Sn-40Bi-Zn specimens at 333 K, under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10−4 s−1. The elongation of the alloys increased in the order of 1Zn < 3Zn < 0.1Zn, likely because their microstructures were modified by Zn addition Figure 11 shows the stress–strain curves of the various Sn-40Bi-Zn specimens at 333 K, under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 . The elongation of the alloys increased in the order of 1Zn < 3Zn < 0.1Zn, likely because their microstructures were modified by Zn addition (Figure 4). Interestingly, the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys showed extensive crystallization of the needle-like Zn particles when the metal was added at a rate of 1 mass% or higher. Therefore, the elongations of Sn-40Bi-1Zn and Sn-40Bi-3Zn were lower than that of Sn-40Bi-Zn. The fractured surfaces of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile test are almost the same as those of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 9). Thus, there is no difference between the additional elements on the fractured photographs.

Figure 12 shows the vertical and cross-sectional images of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile tests. In these tests, the tensile stress was applied to the specimens in the vertical direction. All the alloys displayed chisel-point fractures, which indicate superplastic deformation. The area of the Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn alloy at 353 K was reduced by approximately 99.5%, indicating that the reduction in the area and elongation of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at 353 K decreased with the increasing Zn concentration. The number of voids in the specimens clearly increased with the increasing Zn concentration. Whether there is a correlation between the needle-like Zn particles and the number of voids is unknown, but the tendency of the elongation to decrease with the increasing Zn concentration is considered to be related to the number of voids in the specimens. At high temperatures and low strain rates, which are conducive to superplastic behavior, specimens do not show remarkable elongation of the primary Sn phase in the tensile direction; cracks and voids are observed to be segregated at the grain boundaries around the intermetallic compounds [25]. These results indicate that void accumulation begins from the intermetallic compounds or metal particles, and the final structure of the alloy may be different from its initial dendritic structure. Therefore, dynamic recovery as well as dynamic recrystallization occur after the ultimate tensile strength is achieved, and grain boundary slip deformation may be accompanied by diffusion creep due to void accumulation. Thus, the deformation of the primary Sn phase is the dominant deformation mechanism of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at low temperatures and high strain rates. At high temperatures and low strain rates, the deformation of these alloys leads to dynamic recovery, dynamic recrystallization, and/or grain boundary slip. (Figure 4). Interestingly, the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys showed extensive crystallization of the needle-like Zn particles when the metal was added at a rate of 1 mass% or higher. Therefore, the elongations of Sn-40Bi-1Zn and Sn-40Bi-3Zn were lower than that of Sn-40Bi-Zn. The fractured surfaces of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile test are almost the same as those of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys (Figure 9). Thus, there is no difference between the additional elements on the fractured photographs. Figure 12 shows the vertical and cross-sectional images of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile tests. In these tests, the tensile stress was applied to the specimens in the vertical direction. All the alloys displayed chisel-point fractures, which indicate superplastic deformation. The area of the Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn alloy at 353 K was reduced by approximately 99.5%, indicating that the reduction in the area and elongation of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at 353 K decreased with the increasing Zn concentration. The number of voids in the specimens clearly increased with the increasing Zn concentration. Whether there is a correlation between the needle-like Zn particles and the number of voids is unknown, but the tendency of the elongation to decrease with the increasing Zn concentration is considered to be related to the number of voids in the specimens. At high temperatures and low strain rates, which are conducive to superplastic behavior, specimens do not show remarkable elongation of the primary Sn phase in the tensile direction; cracks and voids are

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 7 of 11

Slip deformation may be speculated to be the dominant deformation mechanism of the eutectic Sn–Bi–Zn matrix. Table 2 summarizes the solidus and liquidus temperatures of the Sn-40Bi and Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys obtained from DSC measurements. The melting point temperature of the alloys decreased when the amount of Zn added was equal to or exceeded 1 mass%, and it was 406 K when the added Zn amount was 3 mass%. The liquidus temperature increased from 440 K in the alloy without Zn to 452 K in the alloy with 1 mass% Zn, but it decreased sharply to 427 K in the alloy with 3 mass% Zn, likely because the ternary eutectic composition of the alloy is close to that of Sn-40Bi-3Zn. Because the tensile test temperature (353 K) is only 87% of the solidus temperature of Sn-40Bi-3Zn, the elongation of this alloy may be estimated to be larger than that of Sn-40Bi-1Zn. This is because superplastic deformation occurring at high temperatures and low liquidus temperatures tends to promote plastic flow. observed to be segregated at the grain boundaries around the intermetallic compounds [25]. These results indicate that void accumulation begins from the intermetallic compounds or metal particles, and the final structure of the alloy may be different from its initial dendritic structure. Therefore, dynamic recovery as well as dynamic recrystallization occur after the ultimate tensile strength is achieved, and grain boundary slip deformation may be accompanied by diffusion creep due to void accumulation. Thus, the deformation of the primary Sn phase is the dominant deformation mechanism of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at low temperatures and high strain rates. At high temperatures and low strain rates, the deformation of these alloys leads to dynamic recovery, dynamic recrystallization, and/or grain boundary slip.

**Figure 11.** Stress–strain curves of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at 333 K under a strain rate of 5.25 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup> **Figure 11.** Stress–strain curves of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys at 333 K under a strain rate of 5.25 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup>−<sup>4</sup> s −1 .

s<sup>−</sup>1.

**Figure 12.** Vertical and cross-sectional optical microscopic images of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile tests. **Figure 12.** Vertical and cross-sectional optical microscopic images of various Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys after the tensile tests.


Slip deformation may be speculated to be the dominant deformation mechanism of the eutectic Sn–Bi–Zn matrix. Table 2 summarizes the solidus and liquidus temperatures **Table 2.** Solidus and liquidus temperatures of the Sn-40Bi-Zn alloys.

#### elongation of this alloy may be estimated to be larger than that of Sn-40Bi-1Zn. This is *3.3. Strain Rate Sensitivity Index (m)*

because superplastic deformation occurring at high temperatures and low liquidus temperatures tends to promote plastic flow. Figure 13 shows the strain rate sensitivity index (*m*) of various Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K. In this study, *m* was generally defined by Equation (1):

$$m = \frac{d\ln\sigma}{d\ln\dot{\epsilon}},\tag{1}$$

Sn-40Bi 411 440 Sn-40Bi-0.1Zn 411 445 Sn-40Bi-1Zn 406 452 Sn-40Bi-3Zn 406 427 where *<sup>σ</sup>* is the stress, and . *ε* is the strain rate. The *m* value is an important parameter that describes the high-temperature tensile ductility of an alloy material; it is calculated from the slopes of the lines obtained at various temperatures and increases with increasing temperature. For materials without superplasticity, *m* < 0.2, whereas, for general superplastic materials with fine grains, the *m* value is usually very large, i.e., *m* = 0.3–1.0. A large

*m* value indicates that large superplastic elongation can be obtained [30–32]. The *m* value calculated from the slopes of the lines shown in Figure 13 is lower than the critical value of 0.3, indicating that the alloys are characterized by fine-grained superplasticity. This result is similar to previous findings reported for Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu and Sn-40Bi-0.01Ni [24,25]. Because the microstructures and average grain sizes of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys are similar to those of Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu, the *m* value of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys also increases with the increasing Sb concentration. Evidently, increasing the Sb concentration influences the superplastic-like deformation of the resultant alloys. These results suggest that although the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys show superplastic-like deformation, their deformation mechanism is not based on fine-grained superplasticity. Thus, it can be considered that the deformation mechanism of the Sn-40Bi-X alloy might be caused by the grain boundary slip, diffusion creep, and dislocation creep. calculated from the slopes of the lines shown in Figure 13 is lower than the critical value of 0.3, indicating that the alloys are characterized by fine-grained superplasticity. This result is similar to previous findings reported for Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu and Sn-40Bi-0.01Ni [24,25]. Because the microstructures and average grain sizes of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys are similar to those of Sn-40Bi-0.1Cu, the *m* value of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys also increases with the increasing Sb concentration. Evidently, increasing the Sb concentration influences the superplastic-like deformation of the resultant alloys. These results suggest that although the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys show superplastic-like deformation, their deformation mechanism is not based on fine-grained superplasticity. Thus, it can be considered that the deformation mechanism of the Sn-40Bi-X alloy might be caused by the grain boundary slip, diffusion creep, and dislocation creep.

Figure 13 shows the strain rate sensitivity index (*m*) of various Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at

ௗ ୪୬ ఙ ௗ ୪୬ ఌሶ

, (1)

where is the stress, and ሶ is the strain rate. The *m* value is an important parameter that describes the high-temperature tensile ductility of an alloy material; it is calculated from the slopes of the lines obtained at various temperatures and increases with increasing temperature. For materials without superplasticity, *m* < 0.2, whereas, for general superplastic materials with fine grains, the *m* value is usually very large, i.e., *m* = 0.3–1.0. A large *m* value indicates that large superplastic elongation can be obtained [30–32]. The *m* value

ൌ

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, 884 9 of 11

353 K. In this study, *m* was generally defined by Equation (1):

*3.3. Strain Rate Sensitivity Index (m)* 

**Figure 13.** Strain rate sensitivity index (*m*) of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K (σ, stress; ሶ, strain rate). **Figure 13.** Strain rate sensitivity index (*m*) of the Sn-40Bi-Sb alloys at 353 K (*σ*, stress; . *ε*, strain rate).

#### **4. Conclusions**

**4. Conclusions**  In this study, the microstructures and tensile behaviors of the Sn-40Bi-X% Sb (X = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0) and Sn-40Bi-Y% Zn (Y = 0.1, 1.0, 3.0) alloys at various temperatures and strain In this study, the microstructures and tensile behaviors of the Sn-40Bi-X% Sb (X = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0) and Sn-40Bi-Y% Zn (Y = 0.1, 1.0, 3.0) alloys at various temperatures and strain rates were investigated using SEM and tensile tests. The following results were obtained.

	- (4) The Sb atoms were dissolved in both the primary Sn phase and the eutectic Sn– Bi matrix. In contrast, the Zn atoms were dissolved in the eutectic Sn–Bi matrix, and needle-like Zn crystals were formed when the Zn concentration exceeded 1 mass%. The deformation of the primary Sn phases is the dominant deformation mechanism at low temperatures and high strain rates. Moreover, deformation at high temperatures and low strain rates leads to recovery, dynamic recrystallization, and/or grain boundary slip.

Further research on complex Sn–Bi-based solder alloys will be conducted in the future to obtain more low-temperature solder candidates that could be applied to electronic devices. **Author Contributions:** A.Y.: Conceptualization, project administration, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft and review, and editing. M.K.: Investigation, review, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 18K03859), and the Inter-University Cooperative Research Program (Proposal Nos. 19G0023, 20G0041, and 202112-CRKEQ-0012) of the Cooperative Research and Development Center for Advanced Materials, Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

**Acknowledgments:** This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K03859. This work was partly performed under the Inter-University Cooperative Research Program (Proposal Nos. 19G0023 and 20G0041) of the Cooperative Research and Development Center for Advanced Materials, Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University. We would like to thank our former students, C. Nagata and K. Tsukamoto, for their technical support during the tensile testing of the Sn–Bi-based alloys.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**

