*5.1. Practical Implications*

According to the study outcomes, salient factors were noticed in determining users' acceptance of the e-learning system and technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived organizational support, and controlled motivation were significant. Hence, upon implementing a new e-learning system, faculty members must be informed about the system's features and its technical issues, as well as its usefulness, so that they feel self-assured and can gain insight into the system. To increase faculty use of the e-learning system, faculty members are of the view that universities should deliver workshops, extensive training, and awareness programs on the system's features, benefits, and usage [100]. In addition, a national survey was conducted, in which 57% of faculty members said that they could become more productive [100] if the use of e-learning technology was communicated thoroughly to them in their courses. Faculty members in this study also reported that, if they were aware of the positive impact of such technology on student learning, they would be inspired to learn and use the e-learning system. Hence, extended online help and periodic training programs for the e-learning system should be offered by the universities to ensure increased use of the system and to increase the faculty's self-efficacy. As a result, this overall phenomenon would help faculty members to obtain practical exposure, acquire better skills and become more proficient in using the e-learning system; as a result of this, their use of the system would be enhanced. In accordance with our findings, there was a weak influence on faculty attitudes toward the e-learning system because of facilitating conditions. Consequently, to ensure the smooth running of the e-learning system, attention must be given by universities to ensuring technical support and reliable network access. Moreover, online and face-to-face support and guidance should be provided by the universities for faculty members to ensure that members have positive attitudes toward the e-learning system and, consequently, that they become capable of extended use of the system [65,101].

#### *5.2. Limitations and Further Research*

This study has the following limitations. Only one university in the United Arab Emirates was considered for studying the impact of factors on the adoption of e-learning systems; this is the key limitation. The applicability and pertinence of this study would have been enhanced if more institutes and universities in the United Arab Emirates had been taken into consideration. With further analysis and insight into the e-learning system, the researchers could have better understood the factors that influence such a system. In addition, the participation of a limited number of students (372) is another limitation. According to [45], a survey questionnaire method was used for data collection. For appropriate and improved outcomes, an enhanced instrument is being sought and more institutes will be taken into account from other regions, such as the Arab Gulf, including Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain. Furthermore, invitations to join the study will be sent to more students, and researchers will conduct focus groups and interviews for suitable results. Moreover, we are seeking to implement the e-learning system in specific Arab universities that have contributed to the research.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S.; methodology, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S.; software, S.S.; validation, S.S.; formal analysis, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S.; investigation, R.S.A and K.A.; resources, K.A.; data curation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S.A.-M.; writing—review and editing, K.A. and S.S.; visualization, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S.; supervision, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S.; project administration, R.S.A.-M., K.A. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**

