*Article* **Key Factors for Implementing Magnetic NDT Method on Thin UHPFRC Bridge Elements**

**Sandra Nunes \* , Mário Pimentel, Aurélio Sine and Paria Mokhberdoran**

CONSTRUCT-LABEST, Faculty of Engineering (FEUP), University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal; mjsp@fe.up.pt (M.P.); aurelio.sine@fe.up.pt (A.S.); pmokhber@fe.up.pt (P.M.)

**\*** Correspondence: snunes@fe.up.pt

**Abstract:** This paper provides an overview of the use of the magnetic NDT method for estimating the fibre content, and fibre orientation and efficiency factors in thin UHPFRC elements/layers, along any two orthogonal directions. These parameters are of utmost importance for predicting the postcracking tensile strength in the directions of interest. After establishing meaningful correlations at the lab-specimen scale, this NDT method can be effectively implemented into quality control protocols at the industrial production scale. The current study critically addresses the influence of key factors associated with using this NDT method in practice and provides recommendations for its efficient implementation.

**Keywords:** ultra-high performance fibre reinforced cementitious composite (UHPFRC); non-destructive method (NDT); magnetic inductance; quality control

## **1. Introduction**

Ultra-high performance fibre reinforced composites (UHPFRC) are used increasingly for a wide range of structural applications, including innovative solutions for new and existing bridges [1–5]. The economic feasibility and interest of UHPFRC have been demonstrated mainly for new (foot)bridges (structures of extended spans and reduced sections) [1] and in the rehabilitation/strengthening of existing reinforced concrete bridge structures [5]. However, using these advanced materials raises new questions, such as how to control/predict the final fibres distribution in a given structural element, which motivated the development of rational tools to optimise casting processes and fibre distribution control [6,7].

UHPFRC elements can be unreinforced in many circumstances, especially in thin UHPFRC elements such as footbridge deck slabs [3,4,8], watertight jackets or layers over existing concrete elements [5,9], among others. In these cases, the tensile strength of UHPFRC is critical and depends primarily on the properties of the matrix and fibres—such as fibre content, geometry, fibre tensile strength and fibre-to-matrix interface bond—but can also vary significantly according to fibre orientation [10,11]. While the former can be tailored during the mix-design stage, the latter depends on the mould geometry, on the casting procedure, the vibration mode (when applied) and the rheological properties of the material in the fresh state, for example, whether the concrete is self-compacting or not [7]. This means that it is very complicated to define an intrinsic tensile response for UHPFRC, and it is necessary to characterise the representative fibre orientation in the actual structure [11,12]. Non-destructive (NDT) evaluation methods are particularly suited for this purpose.

The most comprehensive method for characterising the distribution and orientation of fibres in a specimen is X-ray tomography [13,14]. However, due to its high cost and limitations in terms of the size of the specimen analysed (which depends on the capacity of the tomograph) it is not currently applicable on the industrial scale. Conversely, the methods based on magnetic induction [15–18] and electrical resistivity [19,20] are more

**Citation:** Nunes, S.; Pimentel, M.; Sine, A.; Mokhberdoran, P. Key Factors for Implementing Magnetic NDT Method on Thin UHPFRC Bridge Elements. *Materials* **2021**, *14*, 4353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ma14164353

Academic Editor: Karim Benzarti

Received: 7 July 2021 Accepted: 30 July 2021 Published: 4 August 2021

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Copyright:** © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

effective because of their low cost, ease of use, portability and non-destructive nature. The magnetic method consists of generating a local magnetic field and measuring the influence of the fibres on this magnetic field by measuring the inductance. The electrical resistivity method has similarities in its implementation, although it involves measuring a voltage difference between two electrodes. This method is however very sensitive to environmental conditions, mixture proportions and age of testing [20]; for this reason, the magnetic method is preferred to the detriment of the resistivity method.

The authors recently developed a procedure for estimating the post-cracking tensile strength of a thin UHPFRC layer in the directions of interest, eliminating the need for extracting cores or samples from the structure [21]. This procedure is based on magnetic induction [18] and relies on the ferromagnetic properties of the steel fibres for estimating the parameters of the underlying physical model, namely, the fibre content (V<sup>f</sup> ), the fibre orientation and efficiency factors [21]. The significance of this NDT method for the quality control of thin UHPFRC elements/layers was demonstrated, and this NDT method is now being used by other research groups [12,22,23].

The performance of the magnetic NDT method on field conditions was assessed during the strengthening of the deck slab of the Chillon Viaducts, in Switzerland, with UHPFRC [9,24]. The main objective of the present work is to critically address the influence of key factors associated with the use of this NDT method in practice and find ways of mitigating their effects on inspection performance. In order to accomplish this objective, a new experimental campaign was carried out aiming to understand the impact of the following key factors: element geometry (thickness and area around the probe), surface condition (roughness of the surface), and fibres segregation (in-depth). Recommendations for the proper implementation of the magnetic NDT method in practice are provided.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a systematic study has been undertaken on the influence of these key factors for an efficient implementation of the magnetic method, contributing to the advancement of knowledge and promoting its wider use in field applications.

### **2. Non-Destructive Method**

### *2.1. Principles*

UHPFRC material is constituted by two phases: cementitious matrix and steel fibres. The relative magnetic permeability (Magnetic permeability represents the ease with which a magnetic field is created in an object. The relative magnetic permeability is the ratio between the magnetic permeability of the material and that of the vacuum) of the cementitious matrix equals 1.0 (similar to air) [25], while that of the fibres material (steel) is significantly greater than 1. Therefore, when incorporating short steel fibres in the cementitious matrix, the magnetic permeability of the resulting UHPFRC becomes higher than 1.0.

A magnetic probe was developed for performing inductance measurements [18]. It consists of a U-shaped ferrite core (Siemens ferrite N47) comprising a single copper wire coil around both core legs (see Figure 1). Table 1 summarises the main characteristics of the magnetic probe used in the current study. A high-precision Agilent E4980A LCR Meter (see Figure 1) with a test frequency of 20 Hz and signal level of 2 V (AC) was used to measure both LUHPFRC and Lair using a magnetic probe. As shown in Figure 1, it is possible to attach an acetate sheet to the probe legs, with reference lines drawn in different directions, making it easier to align the probe with the direction of interest.



**Figure 1.** Measurements performed on a UHPFRC large plate using the magnetic probe and an LCR meter. **Figure 1.** Measurements performed on a UHPFRC large plate using the magnetic probe and an LCR meter.

**Table 1.** Characteristics of the magnetic probe. **U-Shape Ferrite Core Copper Wire Coil**  Nunes et al. [18] showed that, for the usual fibre contents, the relative magnetic permeability of UHPFRC (µr) could be readily computed using the following approximation:

$$
\mu\_{\rm r} \approx \frac{\mathcal{L}\_{\rm UHF\%C}}{\mathcal{L}\_{\rm air}} \tag{1}
$$

Nunes et al. [18] showed that, for the usual fibre contents, the relative magnetic permeability of UHPFRC (μr) could be readily computed using the following approximation: where LUHPFRC is the inductance measured through the UHPFRC material and Lair is the inductance measured when the sample is removed (in the air).

<sup>μ</sup><sup>r</sup> <sup>≈</sup> <sup>L</sup>ୌୖେ Lair (1) where LUHPFRC is the inductance measured through the UHPFRC material and Lair is the inductance measured when the sample is removed (in the air). LUHPFRC, and so the relative permeability of UHPFRC, is governed by the properties of the fibre steel, fibre content (Vf) and fibre orientation. *µr* increases with Vf and changes with the measuring direction (θi) when there is a preferential orientation of the fibres in LUHPFRC, and so the relative permeability of UHPFRC, is governed by the properties of the fibre steel, fibre content (V<sup>f</sup> ) and fibre orientation. µ<sup>r</sup> increases with V<sup>f</sup> and changes with the measuring direction (θ<sup>i</sup> ) when there is a preferential orientation of the fibres in the UHPFRC layer [18]. When the axis of the magnetic field (direction of probe legs) and the main direction of the fibres are aligned, the measured inductance (and thus µr, i ) is at its maximum, and vice-versa. As the relative permeability of the cementitious matrix is equal to 1.0, irrespective of its composition and age, µ<sup>r</sup> does not change with cementitious matrix composition or age.

### the UHPFRC layer [18]. When the axis of the magnetic field (direction of probe legs) and *2.2. Determination of Fibre Content and Fibre Orientation*

the main direction of the fibres are aligned, the measured inductance (and thus μ*r, i* ) is at its maximum, and vice-versa. As the relative permeability of the cementitious matrix is equal to 1.0, irrespective of its composition and age, μ<sup>r</sup> does not change with cementi-Nunes et al. [18] proposed the fibre content (µr,mean) and the fibre orientation (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) indicators for UHPFRC, computed from the inductance measurements in any two orthogonal directions (herein designated as X and Y).

tious matrix composition or age. *2.2. Determination of Fibre Content and Fibre Orientation*  Nunes et al. [18] proposed the fibre content (μr,mean) and the fibre orientation (ρଡ଼ − The simplified physical model proposed in [18] was recently generalised, allowing to predict the relative magnetic permeability of a thin UHPFRC layer in any direction and for different types of in-plane fibre distribution functions (herein, we will assume fibres are distributed in XY plane) [26].

### ρଢ଼) indicators for UHPFRC, computed from the inductance measurements in any two orthogonal directions (herein designated as X and Y). 2.2.1. Fibre Content

The simplified physical model proposed in [18] was recently generalised, allowing to predict the relative magnetic permeability of a thin UHPFRC layer in any direction and for different types of in-plane fibre distribution functions (herein, we will assume fibres are distributed in XY plane) [26]. 2.2.1. Fibre Content Based on the generalised simplified model [26], it was confirmed that μr,mean com-Based on the generalised simplified model [26], it was confirmed that µr,mean computed from Equation (2) is practically independent of the fibre orientation (Figure 2a) and increases linearly with the fibre content with a proportionality constant k<sup>V</sup> as depicted in Figure 2b. For V<sup>f</sup> = 0%, µr,mean should equal 1.0 (the relative magnetic permeability of the cementitious matrix); therefore, the regression line should intersect the origin. For a given fibre type (or fibres mixture), after calibrating k<sup>V</sup> by means of representative tests in the laboratory, V<sup>f</sup> can be estimated using Equation (3).

$$
\mu\_{\rm r,mean} = \frac{1}{2} (\mu\_{\rm r,X} + \mu\_{\rm r,Y}) \tag{2}
$$

$$\mathbf{V}\_{\mathbf{f}} = \left(\boldsymbol{\mu}\_{\text{r,mean}} - \mathbf{1}\right) / \mathbf{k}\_{\text{V}} \tag{3}$$

laboratory, Vf can be estimated using Equation (3).

**Figure 2.** (**a**) Variation of μr,i and μr,mean with Vf and the measuring direction θi (preferential fibre orientation coincides with θi = 0°) (**b**) μr,mean linear increase with Vf. **Figure 2.** (**a**) Variation of µr,i and µr,mean with V<sup>f</sup> and the measuring direction θ<sup>i</sup> (preferential fibre orientation coincides with θ<sup>i</sup> = 0◦ ) (**b**) µr,mean linear increase with V<sup>f</sup> .

### 2.2.2. Fibre Orientation 2.2.2. Fibre Orientation

From the same μr,X and μr,Y values, the orientation indicator (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) can be computed from Equation (4), which was shown to be practically independent of the fibre content [18,26]. This indicator allows to identify the direction of preferential orientation of the fibres. Positive or negative (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) values indicate a preferential orientation along the X and Y directions, respectively. Values of (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) close to zero indicate a uniform fibre distribution (The only exception is when all fibres are perfectly aligned along a given direction and X/Y measuring directions form a 45° with the preferential orientation direction of the fibres, but this situation rarely occurs in practice, in real applications. This situation can be easily detected by adding a third measuring direction at each measuring point, for example, along the direction forming 45° with X). (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) value also provides a scalar measure of the fibre anisometry with respect to the *X*- and *Y*- directions, as described in the following paragraphs. From the same µr,X and µr,Y values, the orientation indicator (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) can be computed from Equation (4), which was shown to be practically independent of the fibre content [18,26]. This indicator allows to identify the direction of preferential orientation of the fibres. Positive or negative (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) values indicate a preferential orientation along the X and Y directions, respectively. Values of (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) close to zero indicate a uniform fibre distribution (The only exception is when all fibres are perfectly aligned along a given direction and X/Y measuring directions form a 45◦ with the preferential orientation direction of the fibres, but this situation rarely occurs in practice, in real applications. This situation can be easily detected by adding a third measuring direction at each measuring point, for example, along the direction forming 45◦ with X). (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) value also provides a scalar measure of the fibre anisometry with respect to the X- and Y- directions, as described in the following paragraphs.

fibre type (or fibres mixture), after calibrating k by means of representative tests in the

1 2 <sup>ቀ</sup>μr,X

<sup>+</sup>μr,Y<sup>ቁ</sup> (2)

V f =൫ μ୰,୫ୣୟ୬ − 1൯/k (3)

μr,mean=

$$\rho(\rho\_X - \rho\_Y) = 0.5 \frac{\mu\_{\rm r,X} - \mu\_{\rm r,Y}}{\mu\_{\rm r,mean} - 1} \tag{4}$$

The fibre orientation factor (α0) has been used by several researchers and proved to be an effective tool to characterise the orientation of steel fibres in cracked sections. It was proposed by Krenchel [27] and can be computed as follows: The fibre orientation factor (α0) has been used by several researchers and proved to be an effective tool to characterise the orientation of steel fibres in cracked sections. It was proposed by Krenchel [27] and can be computed as follows:

$$\alpha\_0 = \text{N}\_{\text{f}} \,\frac{\text{A}\_{\text{f}}}{\text{V}\_{\text{f}} \,\text{A}} \tag{5}$$

where N<sup>f</sup> is the number of fibres counted in the cross-section, A the cross-section area analysed, V<sup>f</sup> is the fibre content and A<sup>f</sup> the cross-section area of one fibre. Based on the generalised simplified model [26], for the most common fibre distribution functions in UHPFRC layers, the relation between the fibre orientation indicator (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) and the fibre orientation factor along X- and Y- directions (α0,X and α0,Y) can be linearly approximated as follows (see Figure 3a).

$$\mathfrak{a}\_{\rm 0}\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{k}\_{\rm \alpha} \left(\mathfrak{p}\_{\rm X} - \mathfrak{p}\_{\rm Y}\right) + \mathfrak{a}\_{\rm 0,iso} \\ \mathfrak{a}\_{\rm 0}\mathbf{y} = -\mathbf{k}\_{\rm \alpha} \left(\mathfrak{p}\_{\rm X} - \mathfrak{p}\_{\rm Y}\right) + \mathfrak{a}\_{\rm 0,iso} \tag{6}$$

where k<sup>α</sup> is a constant that needs to be calibrated experimentally for a given fibre type (or fibres mixture), and α0,iso is the fibre orientation factor corresponding to fibre isometry with respect to X- and Y- directions (α0,X= α0,Y) [26]. from Figure 3b as a function of the ratio between the UHPFRC element thickness and the fibre length ratio (hU/lf). When all fibres are lying in the same plane (hU/lf →0), that is, fibres have a perfect 2D distribution *α0,iso* ≈ 0.64. Otherwise, when fibres have a 3D distribution (hU/lf →∞), then α0,iso → 0.5, as shown in Figure 3b.

where kఈ is a constant that needs to be calibrated experimentally for a given fibre type (or fibres mixture), and α0,iso is the fibre orientation factor corresponding to fibre isome-

kఈ can be calibrated based on experimental data obtained, for example, after image analysis of cross-sections normal to X- or Y- directions, using specimens with different fibre contents and a wide range of fibre orientation profiles [21]. α0,iso can be determined

where Nf is the number of fibres counted in the cross-section, A the cross-section area analysed, Vf is the fibre content and Af the cross-section area of one fibre. Based on the generalised simplified model [26], for the most common fibre distribution functions in UHPFRC layers, the relation between the fibre orientation indicator (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) and the fibre orientation factor along X- and Y- directions (α0,X and α0,Y) can be linearly approx-

<sup>α</sup>0,X = k (*ρ*X<sup>−</sup> *<sup>ρ</sup>*Y) + α0,iso ; <sup>α</sup>0,Y=−k (*ρ*X<sup>−</sup> *<sup>ρ</sup>*Y) + α0,iso (6)

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 21

try with respect to X*-* and Y*-* directions (α0,X = α0,Y) [26].

imated as follows (see Figure 3a).

**Figure 3.** (**a**) Linear increase of α0,X with (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼); (**b**) Variation of α0,iso with hU/lf ratio [26]. **Figure 3.** (**a**) Linear increase of α0,X with (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY); (**b**) Variation of α0,iso with hU/l<sup>f</sup> ratio [26].

*2.3. Estimation of the (Post-Cracking) Tensile Strength*  The post-cracking tensile strength of UHPFRC on a given i-direction, fUtu,i, is often estimated as fUtu,i= τ<sup>f</sup> α0,i α1,iVf lf df = τf. λi (7) where τf is the equivalent (rigid-plastic) fibre-to-matrix bond strength and λi is the sok<sup>α</sup> can be calibrated based on experimental data obtained, for example, after image analysis of cross-sections normal to X- or Y- directions, using specimens with different fibre contents and a wide range of fibre orientation profiles [21]. α0,iso can be determined from Figure 3b as a function of the ratio between the UHPFRC element thickness and the fibre length ratio (hU/l<sup>f</sup> ). When all fibres are lying in the same plane (hU/lf→0), that is, fibres have a perfect 2D distribution α0,iso ≈ 0.64. Otherwise, when fibres have a 3D distribution (hU/lf→∞), then α0,iso → 0.5, as shown in Figure 3b.

### called 'fibre structure parameter' [11,21,28], which encompasses fibre parameters related *2.3. Estimation of the (Post-Cracking) Tensile Strength*

to orientation (α0,i), efficiency (α1,i), content (Vf) and geometry (lf/df). λi can be obtained from the analysis of an image of the cross-section under consideration. This requires cut-The post-cracking tensile strength of UHPFRC on a given i-direction, fUtu,i, is often estimated as

$$\mathbf{f}\_{\rm Utu,i} = \tau\_{\rm f} \propto\_{0,\rm i} \alpha\_{1,\rm i} \mathbf{V}\_{\rm f} \frac{\mathbf{l}\_{\rm f}}{\mathbf{d}\_{\rm f}} = \tau\_{\rm f} \lambda\_{\rm i} \tag{7}$$

where τ<sup>f</sup> is the equivalent (rigid-plastic) fibre-to-matrix bond strength and λ<sup>i</sup> is the socalled 'fibre structure parameter' [11,21,28], which encompasses fibre parameters related to orientation (α0,i), efficiency (α1,i), content (V<sup>f</sup> ) and geometry (lf/d<sup>f</sup> ). λ<sup>i</sup> can be obtained from the analysis of an image of the cross-section under consideration. This requires cutting several samples from larger specimens and in different directions, carrying a surface treatment (polishing) and, finally, identifying the fibres, which is a time-consuming process and may not be feasible in actual structures. λ<sup>i</sup> can also be determined by X-ray tomography, which allows the fibres orientation and distribution to be determined very precisely. However, it is a much more expensive process and not currently applicable on an industrial scale. Alternatively, Nunes et al. [21] proposed to estimate λ<sup>i</sup> from the NDT measurements. V<sup>f</sup> and α0,i are estimated using the regression lines presented in Section 2.2, and the fibre efficiency factor (α1,i) can be estimated from α0,i using the relation proposed in [11,21].

Previous work by the authors showed that fUtu,i estimates based on λ<sup>i</sup> results obtained from image analysis or the NDT measurements have equivalent accuracy, thereby

demonstrating the significance of the proposed NDT method for the quality control of thin UHPFRC elements/layers [21,26].

### **3. Experimental Programme**

### *3.1. Materials and Mix-Proportions*

The non-proprietary UHPFRC mixes employed in this study are presented in Table 2. The binder phase consisted of ordinary Portland cement (Type I and class 42.5 R), limestone filler (98% CaCO3) and silica fume (in suspension with 50% solids content, SiO<sup>2</sup> > 90%,) with a specific gravity of 3.16, 2.68 and 1.38, respectively. As aggregate, a fine siliceous sand (maximum size of 1 mm) was used with a specific gravity of 2.63 and 0.3% water absorption. Besides the water included in the silica fume, the water amount indicated in Table 2 and a polycarboxylate-based superplasticiser (specific gravity of 1.08 and 40% solid content) were added to the mixture. Concerning the fibres phase, a hybrid mixture of two types of straight steel fibres was used, both having high tensile strength (2100 MPa) and circular cross-section (d<sup>f</sup> = 0.175 mm), but different slenderness (lf/d<sup>f</sup> = 51 and 69). The performance of this hybrid mixture of fibres was evaluated in a previous experimental campaign that involved performing uniaxial tensile tests on specimens with 1.5% and 3% fibre content, and covering a wide range of orientation distributions [11].


**Table 2.** Mix-proportions of UHPFRC employed in this study (kg/m<sup>3</sup> ).

(\*) percentage of superplasticizer (solid content) by weight of cement.

### *3.2. Mixing, Workability and Specimen Preparation*

The mixing sequence consisted of the following steps: (1) mixing the binder materials, aggregate and 80% of the mixing water for 2.5 min; (2) stopping to scrape material adhering to the mixing bowl; (3) mixing for another 2.5 min; (4) adding the rest of the water with 75% of the superplasticiser, mixing for 2.5 min and repeating step 2); (5) adding the rest of the superplasticiser; mixing for another 1.5 min; (6) adding the fibres and finally mixing during a further 2 min. In the mixtures with higher fibre contents (3% and 4%), fibres were incorporated in two steps, half the amount at a time.

Immediately after mixing, the mortar flow test was carried out (using a mini-cone according to EFNARC recommendations [29]) to assess the mixture's flowability by calculating the flow diameter (Dflow) as the mean of two diameters of the spread area.

In order to understand the effect of specimens geometry (thickness and area around the probe), surface condition (roughness of the surface) and fibres segregation (in-depth) on the inductance measurements, and thus relative magnetic permeability, three test series were developed according to Table 3. The geometry, position of the moulds during casting and number of specimens prepared for each test series is indicated in Table 3. In general, special care was taken during the casting of specimens to promote a random orientation of fibres within the specimens. The discharge point was moved randomly along the mould not to let the material flow, preventing a preferential orientation of the

fibres. In some specimens of test series C, the orientation of fibres was forced by pouring UHPFRC with the mould placed inside an orientation set-up, where an electromagnetic field was produced, promoting preferential orientation of the fibres, as described in [21]. After casting, the specimens were covered with a plastic sheet and demoulded after one day. Then, the samples were maintained in a chamber under controlled environmental conditions (temperature = 20 ± 2 ◦C and relative humidity > 95%).


**Table 3.** NDT testing programme.

(\*) fibres orientation was achieved by means of an external electromagnetic field.

As the relative permeability of the cementitious matrix is equal to 1.0, irrespective of its composition and age, the inductance measurements could be carried out immediately after demolding.

### *3.3. NDT Testing*

### 3.3.1. Test Series A

In order to assess the effect of the specimen's thickness on the relative magnetic permeability evaluated using the NDT method, inductance measurements were performed on cylindrical specimens (150 mm diameter) with decreasing thickness. The probe was placed in the centre of the moulded surface of the cylinder and inductance measurements were taken every 15◦ . The choice of a cylindrical specimen for this series of tests was dictated by the greater ease of handling during the cutting process. The specimens had an original thickness of 100 mm (see Figure 4), from which layers were successively cut (using a diamond blade saw) and removed until the height was reduced to 20 mm. The first five layers to be removed had 10 mm thickness, while the remaining had just about 5 mm (see Figure 5). Inductance measurements, with the probe placed in the centre of the specimen, were repeated at each stage, always using the same surface (moulded face).

### 3.3.2. Test Series B

In order to assess the effect of specimen area, three large plates of 350 <sup>×</sup> <sup>350</sup> <sup>×</sup> 30 mm<sup>3</sup> were produced. Two of these plates were cast horizontally (here referenced as H1 and H2), while the other was cast in the vertical position (here referenced as V1). The plate size was reduced from 300 mm to 100 mm by cutting it with a diamond blade saw, 10–25 mm at a time (Figure 6a). Inductance measurements were repeated at each stage, with the probe

placed in the centre of the plate and always using the same surface (moulded face). Again, inductance measurements were taken every 15◦ (see Figure 6b). *Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 21 *Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 21

**Figure 4.** Specimens used in test series A (with original thickness). **Figure 4.** Specimens used in test series A (with original thickness). **Figure 4.** Specimens used in test series A (with original thickness).

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 21

**Figure 5.** Successive removal of layers of the original cylinder. **Figure 5.** Successive removal of layers of the original cylinder. **Figure 5.** Successive removal of layers of the original cylinder. Again, inductance measurements were taken every 15° (see Figure 6b).

**Figure 6.** (**a**) Successive reduction of plate size; (**b**) Inductance measurements in the centre of the plate (original size). **Figure 6.** (**a**) Successive reduction of plate size; (**b**) Inductance measurements in the centre of the plate (original size).

### 3.3.3. Test Series C

Within test series C, 12 plate specimens of 200 <sup>×</sup> <sup>200</sup> <sup>×</sup> 30 mm<sup>3</sup> were produced. For each fibre content, two specimens were cast horizontally (one with random and the other with preferential fibre orientation), and one specimen was cast vertically, as shown in

probe placed in the centre of the plate and always using the same surface (moulded face).

(**a**) (**b**)

(**a**) (**b**)

Figure 7. Inductance measurements were taken on both surfaces of each specimen: one casting surface and one moulded surface, in the case of horizontal specimens, and two moulded surfaces in vertical specimens. Additionally, a polishing machine was used in the casting surface of horizontal specimens to reduce their roughness (smoothed surface), and measurements were repeated on the casting surfaces after polishing (see Figure 8). The testing conditions and specimen referencing are detailed in Table 4. with preferential fibre orientation), and one specimen was cast vertically, as shown in Figure 7. Inductance measurements were taken on both surfaces of each specimen: one casting surface and one moulded surface, in the case of horizontal specimens, and two moulded surfaces in vertical specimens. Additionally, a polishing machine was used in the casting surface of horizontal specimens to reduce their roughness (smoothed surface), and measurements were repeated on the casting surfaces after polishing (see Figure 8). The testing conditions and specimen referencing are detailed in Table 4. with preferential fibre orientation), and one specimen was cast vertically, as shown in Figure 7. Inductance measurements were taken on both surfaces of each specimen: one casting surface and one moulded surface, in the case of horizontal specimens, and two moulded surfaces in vertical specimens. Additionally, a polishing machine was used in the casting surface of horizontal specimens to reduce their roughness (smoothed surface), and measurements were repeated on the casting surfaces after polishing (see Figure 8). The testing conditions and specimen referencing are detailed in Table 4.

Within test series C, 12 plate specimens of 200 × 200 × 30 mm3 were produced. For each fibre content, two specimens were cast horizontally (one with random and the other

Within test series C, 12 plate specimens of 200 × 200 × 30 mm3 were produced. For each fibre content, two specimens were cast horizontally (one with random and the other

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 21

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 21

**Figure 7.** Casting of UHPFRC plates with moulds in (**a**) horizontal position; (**b**) vertical position. **Figure 7.** Casting of UHPFRC plates with moulds in (**a**) horizontal position; (**b**) vertical position. **Figure 7.** Casting of UHPFRC plates with moulds in (**a**) horizontal position; (**b**) vertical position.

3.3.3. Test Series C

3.3.3. Test Series C

**Figure 8.** (**a**) Process of polishing the casting surface; (**b**) Surface after polishing. **Figure 8.** (**a**) Process of polishing the casting surface; (**b**) Surface after polishing. **Figure 8.** (**a**) Process of polishing the casting surface; (**b**) Surface after polishing.


**Table 4.** Referencing of specimens from test series C.

(\*) In the specimen reference i refers to the fibre content.

For each test condition, the magnetic probe was centred in the plate and rotated by 15◦ to take the inductance measurements in different directions (θ<sup>i</sup> = 0◦ up to 180◦ ), similar to the test series A and B.

## **4. Results and Discussion**

## *4.1. Workability*

Table 5 presents the slump-flow diameter results of different mixes tested at different dates. All tested mixtures are self-compacting, exhibiting good flowability. An increase in fibre content leads to a decrease in spread diameter. However, the decrease is not drastic; for instance, tripling the fibres content from 1% to 3% leads to a decrease in the average spread diameter from 290.0 to 287.8 mm or about −0.8%. A higher loss of workability was observed for the fibre content of 4%. Figure 9a,b show pictures of the spread areas for two mixes with a fibre content of 1.0% and 4.0%, respectively. It can be observed that the mixture with the highest fibre content shows some signs of fibre agglomeration within the spread area, while the other mixture had no such effect. In addition, the shape of the spread area assumes a more irregular shape.


**Table 5.** Slump-flow diameter results (mm).

**Figure 9.** Final spread area of UHPFRC mixes with a fibre content of (**a**) 1% and (**b**) 4%. **Figure 9.** Final spread area of UHPFRC mixes with a fibre content of (**a**) 1% and (**b**) 4%.

It should be stressed that UHPFRC mixes with improved flowability, such as those used in this study, facilitate the casting process but have an increased risk of fibres segregation [30]. This subject will be addressed again in Section 4.4. Based on the authors' own experience, the spread diameter should not exceed 265 mm to minimise the risk of fibres It should be stressed that UHPFRC mixes with improved flowability, such as those used in this study, facilitate the casting process but have an increased risk of fibres segregation [30]. This subject will be addressed again in Section 4.4. Based on the authors' own experience, the spread diameter should not exceed 265 mm to minimise the risk of fibres segregation.

### segregation. *4.2. Effect of Specimen Thickness*

in Figure 10b.

*4.2. Effect of Specimen Thickness*  Figure 10a shows the variation of the relative magnetic permeability when the probe was aligned in different directions (θi), with θi*,* ranging from 0° to 180° by steps of 15°. The graphs in Figure 10a were obtained considering μr,θi = μr,(180°-θi). Figure 10a clearly shows the increase of μr,θi with the fibre content. In most specimens, μ<sup>r</sup> does not change significantly with the measuring direction (data points draw approximately a circle, Fig-Figure 10a shows the variation of the relative magnetic permeability when the probe was aligned in different directions (θ<sup>i</sup> ), with θ<sup>i</sup> , ranging from 0◦ to 180◦ by steps of 15◦ . The graphs in Figure 10a were obtained considering µr,θ<sup>i</sup> = µr,(180◦ -θi). Figure 10a clearly shows the increase of µr,θ<sup>i</sup> with the fibre content. In most specimens, µ<sup>r</sup> does not change significantly with the measuring direction (data points draw approximately a circle, Figure 10a), confirming a random distribution of fibres. The only exception is the specimen with V<sup>f</sup> = 4%, where some preferential fibre orientation is observed along θ<sup>i</sup> = 30◦ direction (data

ure 10a), confirming a random distribution of fibres. The only exception is the specimen with Vf = 4%, where some preferential fibre orientation is observed along θi = 30° direction

tion, Figure 10a). This is also clearly indicated by the variation of the orientation indicator

Figure 11a shows the variation of the mean relative magnetic permeability for all four specimens as a function of the specimen's thickness. μr,mean decreases with the thickness of

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 10.** Variation of (**a**) μ<sup>r</sup> and (**b**) (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) with the measuring direction (specimens with hU = 100 mm). segregation.

*4.2. Effect of Specimen Thickness* 

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 21

(**a**) (**b**)

**Figure 9.** Final spread area of UHPFRC mixes with a fibre content of (**a**) 1% and (**b**) 4%.

points draw approximately an ellipse with its major axis aligned with θ<sup>i</sup> = 30◦ direction, Figure 10a). This is also clearly indicated by the variation of the orientation indicator in Figure 10b. (data points draw approximately an ellipse with its major axis aligned with θi = 30° direction, Figure 10a). This is also clearly indicated by the variation of the orientation indicator in Figure 10b.

It should be stressed that UHPFRC mixes with improved flowability, such as those used in this study, facilitate the casting process but have an increased risk of fibres segregation [30]. This subject will be addressed again in Section 4.4. Based on the authors' own experience, the spread diameter should not exceed 265 mm to minimise the risk of fibres

Figure 10a shows the variation of the relative magnetic permeability when the probe was aligned in different directions (θi), with θi*,* ranging from 0° to 180° by steps of 15°. The graphs in Figure 10a were obtained considering μr,θi = μr,(180°-θi). Figure 10a clearly shows the increase of μr,θi with the fibre content. In most specimens, μ<sup>r</sup> does not change significantly with the measuring direction (data points draw approximately a circle, Figure 10a), confirming a random distribution of fibres. The only exception is the specimen with Vf = 4%, where some preferential fibre orientation is observed along θi = 30° direction

**Figure 10.** Variation of (**a**) μ<sup>r</sup> and (**b**) (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) with the measuring direction (specimens with hU = 100 mm). **Figure 10.** Variation of (**a**) µ<sup>r</sup> and (**b**) (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) with the measuring direction (specimens with h<sup>U</sup> = 100 mm).

Figure 11a shows the variation of the mean relative magnetic permeability for all four specimens as a function of the specimen's thickness. μr,mean decreases with the thickness of Figure 11a shows the variation of the mean relative magnetic permeability for all four specimens as a function of the specimen's thickness. µr,mean decreases with the thickness of the specimen, for h<sup>U</sup> < 70 mm, thus the calibrating constant k<sup>V</sup> in Equation (3) will also change with hU. From Equation (3), for each specimen thickness, k<sup>V</sup> can be estimated from

$$\mathbf{k}\_{\rm V} = \frac{\mathbf{V}\_{\rm f}}{\left(\mu\_{\rm r,mean} - 1\right)}\tag{8}$$

and then, by normalising the results dividing them by the constant obtained for h<sup>U</sup> = 100 mm (kV,100). Figure 11b was obtained. It can be observed that all data points can be fitted by a Chapman-Richards growth function of the type

$$\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{x}) = \mathbf{y}\_{\text{max}} \left[ \mathbf{1} - \mathbf{e}^{-\mathbf{k}\mathbf{x}} \right]^{\text{P}} \tag{9}$$

where ym*a*<sup>x</sup> = 1.0, and k and p are the fitting parameters. Therefore, when the thickness of the element under analysis does not match the thickness of the specimens used to fit the line in Figure 2b, k<sup>V</sup> should be corrected using a function similar to the one shown in Figure 11b.

### *4.3. Effect of the Specimen Area*

Figure 12a shows the variation of the relative magnetic permeability with the measuring direction of specimens obtained from plate H1. These results reveal a preferential orientation of the fibres in the direction corresponding to θ<sup>i</sup> = 15◦ . Figure 12b shows the change in µr,mean with the reduction of the plates' size. A similar effect of the specimen's size was found on the three plates. Figure 11b shows that µr,mean remains unchanged for specimens with sizes up to 200 mm, decreasing significantly for smaller sizes. Comparing µr,mean results obtained in specimens of 200 mm size with those of 150 mm (the size of the

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 21

by a Chapman-Richards growth function of the type

notched DEWST specimens used in previous campaigns [18,21]), the difference in µr,mean is relatively small (0.27% in plate H1). the line in Figure 2b, k should be corrected using a function similar to the one shown in Figure 11b.

the specimen, for hU < 70mm, thus the calibrating constant k in Equation (3) will also change with hU. From Equation (3), for each specimen thickness, k can be estimated from

k <sup>=</sup> V f

and then, by normalising the results dividing them by the constant obtained for hU = 100 mm (k,ଵ). Figure 11b was obtained. It can be observed that all data points can be fitted

y(x) = y୫á୶[1 − eି୩୶]

where y୫á୶ = 1.0, and k and p are the fitting parameters. Therefore, when the thickness of the element under analysis does not match the thickness of the specimens used to fit

൫ μ୰,୫ୣୟ୬ − 1൯ (8)

<sup>୮</sup> (9)

**Figure 11.** (**a**) Variation of μr,mean with hU; (**b**) Variation of k normalised to k,ଵ with hU. **Figure 11.** (**a**) Variation of µr,mean with hU; (**b**) Variation of k<sup>V</sup> normalised to kV,100 with hU.

**Figure 12.** (**a**) Variation of μr with the measuring direction (Vf = 3%) for square specimens with varying size (plate H1)*;* (**b**) Variation of μr,mean with the specimen size l (plates H1, H2 and V1). **Figure 12.** (**a**) Variation of µ<sup>r</sup> with the measuring direction (V<sup>f</sup> = 3%) for square specimens with varying size (plate H1)*;* (**b**) Variation of µr,mean with the specimen size l (plates H1, H2 and V1).

Dog-bone or dumbbell shape specimens are often used in direct tensile tests to characterise the tensile behaviour of UHPFRC [11,12,28]. This type of specimen usually has reduced dimensions in its central part, making it impossible to comply with the recommended minimum distance between the measuring point and the sides of the specimen. Thus, to characterise the fibre content and orientation in the central part of dog-bone or To perform measurements with a probe similar to the one used in this study (Section 2.1), the measuring points over a UHPFRC layer/specimen should be selected so that a minimum area of 200 <sup>×</sup> 200 mm<sup>2</sup> surrounding the measuring point exists (the probe is centred on the measuring point). Consequently, NDT measuring points should be at a minimum distance of 100 mm from the sides of the test specimens/elements.

dumbbell shape specimens employing this NDT method, it is recommended to cast a large slab and perform the inductance measurements in the zones of interest (corresponding to the central part of the specimens), and only then cutting the dog-bone/dumbbell shape specimens from the large slab. This procedure was followed in the work of Shen and Brühwiler [12] for scaling the representative tensile response of UHPFRC. Dog-bone or dumbbell shape specimens are often used in direct tensile tests to characterise the tensile behaviour of UHPFRC [11,12,28]. This type of specimen usually has reduced dimensions in its central part, making it impossible to comply with the recommended minimum distance between the measuring point and the sides of the specimen. Thus, to characterise the fibre content and orientation in the central part of dog-bone or

tation of the fibres in test series C can be confirmed by comparing the polar plots in Figure 13a,b or the evolution and magnitude of the orientation indicator in Figure 14a,b, corresponding to HRM\_i and HOM\_i specimens, respectively. A more pronounced orientation of fibres can be found in specimens HOM\_i along θi = 0° (or X direction). Some of the HRM\_i specimens also exhibit preferential fibre orientation, originated by the casting conditions, but much less pronounced than in HOM\_i specimens. HRM\_4% is a good exam-

*4.4. Effect of Surface Roughness* 

ple of a uniform fibre distribution.

dumbbell shape specimens employing this NDT method, it is recommended to cast a large slab and perform the inductance measurements in the zones of interest (corresponding to the central part of the specimens), and only then cutting the dog-bone/dumbbell shape specimens from the large slab. This procedure was followed in the work of Shen and Brühwiler [12] for scaling the representative tensile response of UHPFRC.

## *4.4. Effect of Surface Roughness*

The effectiveness of the orientation set-up [21] used to promote a preferential orientation of the fibres in test series C can be confirmed by comparing the polar plots in Figure 13a,b or the evolution and magnitude of the orientation indicator in Figure 14a,b, corresponding to HRM\_i and HOM\_i specimens, respectively. A more pronounced orientation of fibres can be found in specimens HOM\_i along θ<sup>i</sup> = 0◦ (or X direction). Some of the HRM\_i specimens also exhibit preferential fibre orientation, originated by the casting conditions, but much less pronounced than in HOM\_i specimens. HRM\_4% is a good example of a uniform fibre distribution. *Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 21

**Figure 13.** Variation of μr with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface). **Figure 13.** Variation of µ<sup>r</sup> with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface). (**a**) (**b**) **Figure 13.** Variation of μr with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface).

**Figure 14.** Variation of (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface). **Figure 14.** Variation of (ρଡ଼ − ρଢ଼) with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface). **Figure 14.** Variation of (ρ<sup>X</sup> − ρY) with the measuring direction for (**a**) HRM\_i and (**b**) HOM\_i specimens (moulded surface).

cient (*R*2) of the fitting lines presented in Figures 15 and 16.

cient (*R*2) of the fitting lines presented in Figures 15 and 16.

Figures 15 and 16 show the variation of μr,mean computed according to Equation (2) as

Figures 15 and 16 show the positioning of the mould during casting and the choice of the surface to measure inductance can influence the value of the calibrating constant k. No difference was found in results obtained in both faces of VR\_i specimens. However, in both HR\_i and HO\_i specimens, lower μr,mean results were obtained in the casting (upper) surface compared to the moulded surface, attributed to the surface roughness and/or

cally. Table 6 summarises the calibrating constant k and the squared correlation coeffi-

Figures 15 and 16 show the positioning of the mould during casting and the choice of the surface to measure inductance can influence the value of the calibrating constant k. No difference was found in results obtained in both faces of VR\_i specimens. However, in both HR\_i and HO\_i specimens, lower μr,mean results were obtained in the casting (upper) surface compared to the moulded surface, attributed to the surface roughness and/or

Figures 15 and 16 show the variation of μr,mean computed according to Equation (2) as a function of Vf. These figures include results obtained on surfaces with different types of

cally. Table 6 summarises the calibrating constant k and the squared correlation coeffi-

fibres segregation (in-depth).

fibres segregation (in-depth).

Figures 15 and 16 show the variation of µr,mean computed according to Equation (2) as a function of V<sup>f</sup> . These figures include results obtained on surfaces with different types of roughness (moulded, casting, smoothed) and specimens cast both horizontally and vertically. Table 6 summarises the calibrating constant k<sup>V</sup> and the squared correlation coefficient (*R* 2 ) of the fitting lines presented in Figures 15 and 16. reducing the measured inductance. When this occurs, a possible solution is to apply mechanical polishing to the surface to smooth the surface before performing the inductance measurements (see Figure 8). Figure 15 shows μr,mean results increased after polishing the casting surfaces, proving that a better contact was achieved between the probe and the material. Similar surface treatment was adopted in the work of Shen and Brühwiler [12]. material, and air gaps are introduced between the probe and the material, significantly reducing the measured inductance. When this occurs, a possible solution is to apply mechanical polishing to the surface to smooth the surface before performing the inductance measurements (see Figure 8). Figure 15 shows μr,mean results increased after polishing the casting surfaces, proving that a better contact was achieved between the probe and the material. Similar surface treatment was adopted in the work of Shen and Brühwiler [12].

A rough surface does not allow for good contact between the probe and the UHPFRC material, and air gaps are introduced between the probe and the material, significantly

A rough surface does not allow for good contact between the probe and the UHPFRC

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 21

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 21

**Figure 15.** Increase of μr,mean as a function of Vf and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) HR\_i and (**b**) HO\_i specimens. **Figure 15.** Increase of µr,mean as a function of V<sup>f</sup> and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) HR\_i and (**b**) HO\_i specimens. **Figure 15.** Increase of μr,mean as a function of Vf and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) HR\_i and (**b**) HO\_i specimens.

**Figure 16.** Increase of μr,mean results as a function of Vf and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) VR\_i specimens (**b**) all moulded surfaces. **Figure 16.** Increase of μr,mean results as a function of Vf and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) VR\_i specimens (**b**) all moulded surfaces. **Figure 16.** Increase of µr,mean results as a function of V<sup>f</sup> and corresponding fitting lines for (**a**) VR\_i specimens (**b**) all moulded surfaces.

Figures 15 and 16 show the positioning of the mould during casting and the choice of the surface to measure inductance can influence the value of the calibrating constant kV. No difference was found in results obtained in both faces of VR\_i specimens. However, in both HR\_i and HO\_i specimens, lower µr,mean results were obtained in the casting (upper) surface compared to the moulded surface, attributed to the surface roughness and/or fibres segregation (in-depth).


**Table 6.** Calibrating constant k<sup>V</sup> and *R* <sup>2</sup> of fitting lines.

A rough surface does not allow for good contact between the probe and the UHPFRC material, and air gaps are introduced between the probe and the material, significantly reducing the measured inductance. When this occurs, a possible solution is to apply mechanical polishing to the surface to smooth the surface before performing the inductance measurements (see Figure 8). Figure 15 shows µr,mean results increased after polishing the casting surfaces, proving that a better contact was achieved between the probe and the material. Similar surface treatment was adopted in the work of Shen and Brühwiler [12].

### *4.5. Effect of Fibres Segregation (In-Depth)*

When comparing the results obtained on all moulded surfaces (see Figure 16b), from both vertical and horizontal moulds, it can be observed that the fitting lines from VRMA/B\_i and HOM\_i specimens are overlapped (similar k<sup>V</sup> results), but are below the fitting line corresponding to HRM\_i specimens. In order to understand this difference, further studies were carried out to investigate the occurrence of fibres segregation (in-depth) in HRM\_i. For this purpose, small cubic specimens of 30 <sup>×</sup> <sup>30</sup> <sup>×</sup> 30 mm<sup>3</sup> were cut from the centre of plate specimens so that the fibres intersecting a chosen cross-section normal to the X- or Y-axis could be counted (N<sup>f</sup> ). The images of each cross-section were subdivided into 3 mm horizontal layers and the number of fibres per layer was manually counted using ImageJ software [31] (see Figures 17b and 18b). *Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 21

**Figure 17.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness for HR\_i specimens (**b**) image of HR\_4% along X-direction. **Figure 17.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness for HR\_i specimens (**b**) image of HR\_4% along X-direction.

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 18.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness (X-direction) for HO\_i specimens; (**b**) image of HO\_4% specimen

along X-direction.

(**a**) (**b**) **Figure 17.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness for HR\_i specimens (**b**) image of HR\_4% along X-direction.

**Figure 18.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness (X-direction) for HO\_i specimens; (**b**) image of HO\_4% specimen along X-direction. **Figure 18.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness (X-direction) for HO\_i specimens; (**b**) image of HO\_4% specimen along X-direction.

Table 7 summarises the total number of fibres counted in each cross-section. As expected, for the same orientation, N<sup>f</sup> increases with the fibre content. On the other hand, keeping the fibre content, N<sup>f</sup> increases when fibres are more aligned with the direction normal to the cross-section.


**Table 7.** Total number of fibres (N<sup>f</sup> ) counted in a square area of 30 mm in size.

The percentage of fibres per layer found is represented in Figures 17a, 18a and 19a, for each type of specimen. In these graphs, y = 0 corresponds to a moulded surface, which is the bottom face for horizontally cast specimens and a lateral face for vertically cast specimens. The fibres distribution in Figure 17 in comparison to Figure 18 confirms the occurrence of fibres segregation in HR\_i specimens. More fibres were found in the bottom part (moulded surface) of HR\_i specimens compared to the upper part (casting surface), and this explains the higher µr,mean results of HRM\_i in Figure 16b. In-depth fibres segregation in HR\_i specimens was promoted by the higher fluidity of the UHPFRC mixes used in this study (see Section 4.1) and, probably, some agitation of the material during casting, which reduces the matrix yield stress causing fibres settlement.

The wall effect is evidenced in the distribution of fibres of VR\_i specimens presented in Figure 19. A more symmetric distribution of the fibres along the thickness is observed, and significantly fewer fibres were found in the layers closer to the mould walls compared to the centre of the plate.

It is interesting to notice that in HO\_i specimens if we analyse a cross-section parallel to the direction of preferential orientation, a much smaller number of fibres is found, and thus the fibres distribution along the plate thickness has a larger scatter, as shown in Figure 20a. This did not occur with other cross-sections normal to the Y-direction, represented in Figures 17a and 18a, because these specimens have a random fibres distribution and thus not differing significantly in X- and Y-directions.

*Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 21

(**c**)

**Figure 19.** Fibre distribution along the plate thickness for VR\_i specimens: (**a**) along X-direction, (**b**) along Y-direction; (**c**) image of VR\_4% along X-direction. **Figure 19.** Fibre distribution along the plate thickness for VR\_i specimens: (**a**) along X-direction, (**b**) along Y-direction; (**c**) image of VR\_4% along X-direction. *Materials* **2021**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 19 of 21

This paper focused on the effect of key factors for successfully implementing the

1. The proportionality constant k that allows to predict Vf from the μr,mean estimated using the magnetic probe changes with the thickness of the UHPFRC layer (hU). A

2. The magnetic probe used in this study is capable of evaluating the fibre content and fibre orientation in the UHPFRC up to a depth of 70 mm measured from the contact surface. In UHPFRC elements where it is possible to take measurements on two op-

3. To perform measurements with a probe similar to the one used in this study, the measuring points (the point at which the probe is centred) are recommended to be at a minimum distance of 100 mm from the sides of the test specimens/elements. 4. The probe measurements should be performed preferably over a moulded and smooth surface since perfect contact between the probe and the UHPFRC material is necessary to obtain representative measurements. Unevenness, for example, in the

5. The magnetic probe is sensitive to the occurrence of in-depth fibres segregation. Even in thin UHPFRC layers, fibres settlement can occur when casting with more fluid mixtures due to gravity action and/or when the material is agitated during casting. This study raised the awareness that the thickness, area and roughness of the UHP-FRC specimen/element under study, as well as the occurrence of in-depth fibres segregation, can have a significant influence on the inductance results. With the recommendations presented in this paper, one expects to contribute to more efficient use of this NDT method for quality assurance of UHPFRC elements at an industrial scale; being able to provide valuable information on the casting quality (fibres distribution and orientation) and the

It is interesting to notice that in HO\_i specimens if we analyse a cross-section parallel

**Figure 20.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness (Y-direction) for HO\_i specimens; (**b**) image of HO\_2% along Ydirection. **Figure 20.** (**a**) Fibre distribution along the plate thickness (Y-direction) for HO\_i specimens; (**b**) image of HO\_2% along Y-direction.

**5. Conclusions** 

casting surfaces, should be removed by grinding.

in-structure tensile strength in any direction.

correction function is proposed for k as a function of hU.

posite sides the assessed material thickness can be doubled.

### **5. Conclusions**

This paper focused on the effect of key factors for successfully implementing the magnetic NDT method previously developed by the authors [18]. The following conclusions can be drawn from the results presented in this paper:


This study raised the awareness that the thickness, area and roughness of the UHPFRC specimen/element under study, as well as the occurrence of in-depth fibres segregation, can have a significant influence on the inductance results. With the recommendations presented in this paper, one expects to contribute to more efficient use of this NDT method for quality assurance of UHPFRC elements at an industrial scale; being able to provide valuable information on the casting quality (fibres distribution and orientation) and the in-structure tensile strength in any direction.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, S.N. and M.P.; methodology, S.N. and M.P.; software, A.S.; validation, A.S., S.N., and M.P.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation, P.M. and A.S.; resources, S.N.; data curation, A.S. and P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.; writing—review and editing, M.P.; visualization, S.N.; supervision, S.N. and M.P.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This work was financially supported by: Base Funding—UIDB/04708/2020 and Programmatic Funding—UIDP/04708/2020 of the CONSTRUCT—Instituto de I&D em Estruturas e Construções—funded by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC); by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031777—"UHPGRADE—Next generation of ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced cement-based composites for rehabilitation and strengthening of the existing infrastructure" funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT/MCTES; by the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian through the PhD grant n◦144945; and by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through the PhD scholarship UID/04708/2020.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** Collaboration and materials supply by Concremat, Secil, Omya Comital, Sika, MC-Bauchemie and KrampeHarex is gratefully acknowledged. Lastly, the third author is grateful for the support of the Laboratório de Engenharia de Moçambique (LEM).

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.
