*3.1. Related Reviews*

lished papers.

*3.1. Related Reviews*  To justify the importance of consumers' attitudes regarding the development of SFCSs, the relevant reviews were analyzed in depth. The searching method was similar to the one explained above, but this time, the authors looked for reviews only. The number of publications did not provide an opportunity for proper classification, so only SFSCrelated works were involved. Since the databases of JSTORE and Proquest could not be To justify the importance of consumers' attitudes regarding the development of SFCSs, the relevant reviews were analyzed in depth. The searching method was similar to the one explained above, but this time, the authors looked for reviews only. The number of publications did not provide an opportunity for proper classification, so only SFSC-related works were involved. Since the databases of JSTORE and Proquest could not be limited to "review articles", only the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct were used for this purpose. Table 1 shows the different issues of the already published papers.

limited to "review articles", only the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct were used for this purpose. Table 1 shows the different issues of the already pub-The listed works highlight that the main directions within this topic are related to sustainability, locality, community and development. These reviews foreshadow the stressed role of consumers' personalities and attitudes, which this research studies.


**Table 1.** Studies reviewing the academic literature on SFSC-related topics.

Source: own elaboration.
