*3.1. Significant Differences in Household Food Insecurity (HFIAS) between CSVs*

The ANOVA results showed that significant differences were found between the CSVs Htee Pu (*M* = 1.29 ± 0.11), Ma Sein (*M* = 3.89 ± 0.22), Saktha (*M* = 7.01 ± 0.22) and TKM (*M* = 4.48 ± 0.32) (Figure 2). On average, individuals in Saktha had the highest HFIAS scores, indicating that they tended to be the most food-insecure. Conversely, Htee Pu CSV had the lowest HFIAS scores, indicating that this community is the most food-secure out of the four CSVs. There was no significant difference among the HFIAS scores of the villages of Taung Kamau and Ma Sein. These results indicate that, in Myanmar, food security varies between CSV locations, where, within this study, the Saktha CSV in Chin State is the most food-insecure compared to the other CSVs.
