*3.3. Number of CSA Options Adopted by the Households Correlates with HFIAS and HDDS*

To investigate the impact of CSA introductions, the numbers of households that were considered to have diverse diets both before and after CSA introduction were considered. Across all four CSVs, 37% of households with no access to CSA obtained a score of 7 or higher, while, for households with access to at least one CSA intervention, this increased to 47%.

An effect likelihood ratio test (Table 3) confirmed that the location of each CSV had the most significant influence on the HFIAS scores, while the "numbers of CSA" were not significantly different. This suggests that the numbers of CSA interventions, carried out under these circumstances, had no influence on the HFIAS score that a household could achieve over the timescale of the intervention that was measured.

**Table 3.** Effect likelihood ratio test (ELRT) carried out to determine which factors influence the HFIAS scores of households across all four CSVs.


The impact of different variables on HDDS was also determined (Table 4) and the results indicated that both "location" and "number of CSA" options implemented had highly significant differences (*p* = 0.0002).

**Table 4.** Effect likelihood ratio test carried out to determine which factors influence the HDDS of households across all four CSVs.

