*3.2. Significant Differences in Household Dietary Diversity (HDDS) among CSVs*

To identify any differences in the dietary diversity of households (HH) in the four CSVs, mean HDDS scores were calculated for each village, where a HDDS of 7 or higher indicates that a HH has an adequately diverse diet (Figure 3). ANOVA results indicated that there was no significant difference between the villages of Htee Pu (*M* = 6.6 ± 0.07) and Ma Sein (*M* = 6.7 ± 0.12). However, TKM (*M* = 6.22 ± 0.13) and Saktha (*M* = 5.4 ± 0.09) were instead both statistically different from each other and the other two villages. Our results indicate that the Htee Pu and Ma Sein have the best mean dietary diversity scores, while Saktha has the worst average HDDS.

**Figure 2.** HFIAS Scores recorded from four Myanmar CSVs. The central line of each column represents the mean HFIAS Score for each CSV ± the standard error, with the outermost lines representing standard deviation. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical differences; villages with different letters are significantly different at a 95% confidence interval.

**Figure 3.** HDDS Scores recorded from four Myanmar CSVs. The central line of each column represents the mean HDDS Score for each CSV ± the standard error, with the outermost lines representing standard deviation. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical differences; villages with different letters are significantly different at a 95% confidence interval.
