*Review* **Nanostructured Iridium Oxide: State of the Art**

**Francesca Scarpelli <sup>1</sup> , Nicolas Godbert 1,2,\* , Alessandra Crispini 1,2 and Iolinda Aiello 1,2,3**


**Abstract:** Iridium Oxide (IrO<sup>2</sup> ) is a metal oxide with a rutile crystalline structure, analogous to the TiO<sup>2</sup> rutile polymorph. Unlike other oxides of transition metals, IrO<sup>2</sup> shows a metallic type conductivity and displays a low surface work function. IrO<sup>2</sup> is also characterized by a high chemical stability. These highly desirable properties make IrO<sup>2</sup> a rightful candidate for specific applications. Furthermore, IrO<sup>2</sup> can be synthesized in the form of a wide variety of nanostructures ranging from nanopowder, nanosheets, nanotubes, nanorods, nanowires, and nanoporous thin films. IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructuration, which allows its attractive intrinsic properties to be enhanced, can therefore be exploited according to the pursued application. Indeed, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures have shown utility in fields that span from electrocatalysis, electrochromic devices, sensors, fuel cell and supercapacitors. After a brief description of the IrO<sup>2</sup> structure and properties, the present review will describe the main employed synthetic methodologies that are followed to prepare selectively the various types of nanostructures, highlighting in each case the advantages brought by the nanostructuration illustrating their performances and applications.

**Keywords:** iridium oxide; nanostructuration; IrO<sup>2</sup> applications; IrO<sup>2</sup> synthesis; OER

## **1. Introduction**

Iridium Oxide (IrO2) is a noble metal oxide with a rutile crystalline structure [1], with a *P*42/*mnm* space group. The rutile structure is characterized by a tetragonal unit cell in which every Iridium ion is coordinated to six Oxygen ions, adopting an octahedral geometry (Figure 1). *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 24

**Figure 1.** Unit cell, cell parameters and X-ray diffraction pattern with relative (hkl) indexation of IrO2, information extracted from deposited crystal structure (yellow: Ir atoms, red: O atoms) [2]. **Figure 1.** Unit cell, cell parameters and X-ray diffraction pattern with relative (hkl) indexation of IrO<sup>2</sup> , information extracted from deposited crystal structure (yellow: Ir atoms, red: O atoms) [2].

**Conductivity** 

cm−1) [7]

cm−1) [9]

cm−1) [11]

cm−1) [14]

cm−1)[12]

Unlike other transition metal oxides, IrO2 shows a metallic-type conductivity (~104

cm−1) [3]. The reason for this behaviour was first investigated by Gillson et al. [1]: IrO2,

presence of a partially filled electron band in IrO2, having a *d* character, just at the Fermi level, which could be responsible of the high conductivity of the metal oxide. Besides its high electrical conductivity, IrO2 is also characterized by high chemical stability, low surface work function (4.23 eV) [5] and good stability under the influence of a high electric fields. Note that the work function (energy required for moving an electron from the Fermi level to the local vacuum level) is a surface sensitive property and typically depends on the electron chemical potential and the polarisation of the surface. Consequently, the work function can be modulated by several factors in particular the surface roughness and the orientation of the crystal lattice (i.e., which crystal face is mostly exposed). However, the more significant parameter to tune the work function of metal oxides would probably be the superficial oxygen vacancies [6]. Consequently, nanostructuration of metal oxides will have a great influence on the overall work function of the produced material. Table 1 reports the average work function of the most frequently studied metal oxides in comparison to IrO2, considering thin films of polycrystalline metal oxide (i.e.,

**Citation:** Scarpelli, F.; Godbert, N.; Crispini, A.; Aiello, I. Nanostructured Iridium Oxide: State of the Art. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, 115. https:// doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10080115

Academic Editor: Roberto Nisticò

Received: 8 July 2022 Accepted: 1 August 2022 Published: 5 August 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

S.

**Metal Oxide** 

without any preferred surface direction growth).

**Work Function (eV) \*** 

**Table 1.** Work functions and conductive characteristics of some metal-oxides.

IrO2 4.23 [5] Metallic (ca. 104 S.

TiO 4.7 [8] Metallic (5882 S.

ReO3 6.75 [10] Metallic (ca.105 S.

MoO2 5.9 [8] Metallic (3355S.

RuO2 5.2 [13] Metallic (ca. 1,3.104 S.

NiO 6.3 [8] *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 4 eV [15] CuO 5.9 [8] *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 1.5 eV [16] Cu2O 4.9 [8] *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 2.40 eV [17]

Unlike other transition metal oxides, IrO<sup>2</sup> shows a metallic-type conductivity (~10<sup>4</sup> <sup>S</sup>·cm−<sup>1</sup> ) [3]. The reason for this behaviour was first investigated by Gillson et al. [1]: IrO2, like other dioxides with a rutile-related structure, have incompletely filled *d* shells [IrO<sup>2</sup> (5d<sup>5</sup> )]. Later, Verbist et al. [4], used X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, to confirm the presence of a partially filled electron band in IrO2, having a *d* character, just at the Fermi level, which could be responsible of the high conductivity of the metal oxide. Besides its high electrical conductivity, IrO<sup>2</sup> is also characterized by high chemical stability, low surface work function (4.23 eV) [5] and good stability under the influence of a high electric fields. Note that the work function (energy required for moving an electron from the Fermi level to the local vacuum level) is a surface sensitive property and typically depends on the electron chemical potential and the polarisation of the surface. Consequently, the work function can be modulated by several factors in particular the surface roughness and the orientation of the crystal lattice (i.e., which crystal face is mostly exposed). However, the more significant parameter to tune the work function of metal oxides would probably be the superficial oxygen vacancies [6]. Consequently, nanostructuration of metal oxides will have a great influence on the overall work function of the produced material. Table 1 reports the average work function of the most frequently studied metal oxides in comparison to IrO2, considering thin films of polycrystalline metal oxide (i.e., without any preferred surface direction growth).


**Table 1.** Work functions and conductive characteristics of some metal-oxides.

\* reported on polycrystalline thin film. \*\* not reported (to the best of our knowledge).

The appealing properties displayed by IrO<sup>2</sup> enable its use in many applications despite its relatively high cost. The main application fields of IrO<sup>2</sup> are summarized in Table 2 together with their challenging issues that are still nowadays to overcome.

In particular, IrO<sup>2</sup> plays a pivotal role in water electrolysis, the process in which water is split into hydrogen and oxygen gases, by means of the passing of an electric current. This process, if driven by renewable energy (solar or wind), can produce highquality and clean hydrogen, as an energy source alternative to fossil fuels. Specifically, IrO<sup>2</sup> is considered one of the most active electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER), the anodic reaction of water electrolysis, in which water is oxidized to molecular oxygen. OER represents the limiting process in water electrolysis, which determines the cell

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 24

ZrO2 3.1 [29] insulator

Co3O4 6.3 [8] *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 2.07eV [18] CoO 4.6 [8] *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 2.6eV [19]

Rh2O3 *<sup>n</sup>*.r. \*\* *p*-type semiconductor, band gap 1.4eV for Rh2O3(I) and 1.2 for

TiO2 5.4 [8] *n*-type semiconductor, band gap anatase 3.2eV, rutile 3.0 eV [20]

The appealing properties displayed by IrO2 enable its use in many applications despite its relatively high cost. The main application fields of IrO2 are summarized in Table 2 together with their challenging issues that are still nowadays to overcome.

In particular, IrO2 plays a pivotal role in water electrolysis, the process in which water is split into hydrogen and oxygen gases, by means of the passing of an electric current. This process, if driven by renewable energy (solar or wind), can produce high-quality and clean hydrogen, as an energy source alternative to fossil fuels. Specifically, IrO2 is

OER represents the limiting process in water electrolysis, which determines the cell

MoO3 6.82 [8] *n*-type semiconductor, α-MoO3band gap 3.2 eV [21] WO3 6.8 [8] *n*-type semiconductor, band gap 2.75 eV [22] SnO2 4.75 [23] *n*-type semiconductor, band gap 3.6 eV[24] In2O3 5.0 [25] *n*-type semiconductor, band gap 3.75 eV [26] ZnO 4.71 [27] *n*-type semiconductor, 3.3 eV [28]

V2O5 7.0 [30] insulator-metal transition (275 °C)[6] V2O3 4.9 [8] insulator-metal transition (−111 °C) [31] \* reported on polycrystalline thin film. \*\* not reported (to the best of our knowledge).

Rh2O3(III)[14]

voltage and therefore the energy consumption of the process [32]. IrO<sup>2</sup> have been shown to possess very high electrocatalytic activity for OER, improving the process efficiency [33,34]. Several computational studies, electrochemical studies and characterization techniques, including, X-ray absorption near-edge structure, near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure, X-ray absorption, X-ray photoelectron, and Raman spectroscopies, have been devoted to understanding the OER mechanism over IrO<sup>2</sup> [35–37]. According to Nilsson et al. [37], IrO<sup>2</sup> surface in contact with water undergoes to a partial hydroxylation, showing hydroxide sites which coexist with the oxide sites. During OER, the hydroxide sites are converted into oxide sites, passing through an -OOH as intermediate. The simultaneous formation of some Ir(V) centres was ascertained, which could be responsible for the catalytic activity of IrO<sup>2</sup> toward OER, since its subsequent two-electrons reduction to Ir(III) can be sufficient to oxidize water in an oxygen molecule. However, several possible OER catalytic cycles over IrO2, recently reviewed by Naito et al., have been proposed [35]. Specifically, the catalytic cycle can proceed via the oxidation-reduction reactions of either the Iridium centre or the absorbed O species or the Ir=O states. A catalytic cycle driven by the releasing and filling of an oxygen vacancy at the IrO<sup>2</sup> surface has also been suggested. Full understanding of the OER mechanism over Iridium is thus a contemporary and challenging issue that still requires attention for the design of future efficient IrO<sup>2</sup> based catalysts. voltage and therefore the energy consumption of the process [32]. IrO2 have been shown to possess very high electrocatalytic activity for OER, improving the process efficiency [33,34]. Several computational studies, electrochemical studies and characterization techniques, including, X-ray absorption near-edge structure, near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure, X-ray absorption, X-ray photoelectron, and Raman spectroscopies, have been devoted to understanding the OER mechanism over IrO2 [35–37]. According to Nilsson et al. [37], IrO2 surface in contact with water undergoes to a partial hydroxylation, showing hydroxide sites which coexist with the oxide sites. During OER, the hydroxide sites are converted into oxide sites, passing through an -OOH as intermediate. The simultaneous formation of some Ir(V) centres was ascertained, which could be responsible for the catalytic activity of IrO2 toward OER, since its subsequent two-electrons reduction to Ir(III) can be sufficient to oxidize water in an oxygen molecule. However, several possible OER catalytic cycles over IrO2, recently reviewed by Naito et al., have been proposed [35]. Specifically, the catalytic cycle can proceed via the oxidation-reduction reactions of either the Iridium centre or the absorbed O species or the Ir=O states. A catalytic cycle driven by the releasing and filling of an oxygen vacancy at the IrO2 surface has also been suggested. Full understanding of the OER mechanism over Iridium is thus a contemporary and challenging issue that still requires attention for the design of future

Moreover, IrO<sup>2</sup> is an electrochromic (EC) material that displays a reversible and persistent colour change under an external electric field, thus finding application in electrochromic devices. The change in its optical properties may be ascribed to the following reaction [38], as shown in Scheme 1: efficient IrO2 based catalysts. Moreover, IrO2 is an electrochromic (EC) material that displays a reversible and persistent colour change under an external electric field, thus finding application in electrochromic devices. The change in its optical properties may be ascribed to the following reaction [38], as shown in scheme 1:

**Scheme 1.** Redox reaction at the basis of IrO2 EC properties. **Scheme 1.** Redox reaction at the basis of IrO2 EC properties.

> During colouring, electrons and protons are removed from the material by application of an anodic potential, whereas during bleaching electrons and protons are injected into the substrate [39]. In its lower oxidation states [Ir(III)], Iridium (hydr)oxide is transparent, while in its higher oxidation state [Ir(IV)], IrO<sup>2</sup> turns to a blue-black colour due to a strong absorption in the visible spectral region [40]. IrO<sup>2</sup> presents several ideal features for an EC material, such as fast colour change, good open-circuit memory, and long last durability (more than 10<sup>7</sup> cycle lives) [40,41], which promote its application in EC devices [41–44].

> Notably, the transition between two oxidation states [Ir(III) and Ir(IV)] is also exploited for the fabrication of IrO<sup>2</sup> based pH sensors [45–48]. Owing to proton–electron double injection, IrO<sup>2</sup> is reduced to Ir(OH)<sup>3</sup> during pH detection [47]. IrO<sup>2</sup> provides a fast-potentiometric response to pH change, thanks to its high conductivity. IrO2-based electrodes have useful properties, such as high stability in a wide range of temperature (from −20 ◦C to 250 ◦C) [49–51], linear response in a broad pH range (from pH = 0 to pH = 12) [50,52,53], great chemical stability, and low impedance [54]. Moreover, IrO2-based electrodes could be used in many application fields, since their pH response is not affected by most anions present in environmental systems, such as Na<sup>+</sup> , K<sup>+</sup> , Li<sup>+</sup> , Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl−, Br−, NO<sup>3</sup> −, nor by the main complexing agents present in biological systems, such as citrate, lactate and phosphate [53]. For these reasons, IrO<sup>2</sup> has been widely employed for the sensing of glucose, hydrogen peroxide, glutamate, metal ions, organophosphates, and pesticides [55]. Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration approved IrO<sup>2</sup> as a high biocompatible material, facilitating its application in biosensors [56,57], probe for fluorescence imaging [58], photodynamic/photothermal therapy [59], and stimulating and recording electrodes [60,61]. To this end, due to its high charge capacity, for a given applied voltage pulse, IrO<sup>2</sup> is able to inject a very high charge density [62].

> By virtue of its conductive nature, high chemical stability, low surface work function (4.23 eV) and stability under influence of high electric fields, IrO<sup>2</sup> has been used as field emitter cathode in vacuum microelectronics [63–65]. Indeed, IrO<sup>2</sup> doesn't suffer from

the eventual presence of residual Oxygen in these devices, contrary to other metals, as Molybdenum, that reacts quickly with O<sup>2</sup> forming an insulating layer of oxide [66].

Further applications of IrO<sup>2</sup> include electrode material for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) [67], for supercapacitors [68], and for neural stimulation [69]. Specifically, the anodic reaction in a DMFC, in which methanol is oxidized to carbon dioxide, can be efficiently catalysed by IrO<sup>2</sup> [67]. Moreover, IrO2, thanks to its ability to store electricity, can be an excellent negative electrode for electrochemical capacitors [68].


**Table 2.** Main applications of IrO<sup>2</sup> -based materials.

Noticeably, the above-described applications of IrO<sup>2</sup> can benefit from the use of nanostructures instead of bulk IrO2. Indeed, all the intrinsic properties of IrO2, as well as for other transition metal oxides, can be improved through its nanostructuration. Thus, the synthesis of IrO<sup>2</sup> in its nanostructured form (structures presenting at least one dimension on the nanoscale) has become an increasing field of interest in research. In particular, nanostructured materials that exhibit chemical, optical, mechanical and electrical properties modified with respect to the corresponding bulk material, due to size and quantum effects [81–86]. Several types of nanostructures, with different dimensionality, are known, including zero-dimensional (0D, quantum dots and nanopowder), one-dimensional (1D, nanotubes, nanowires and nanorods), and two-dimensional (2D, nanostructured films) nanomaterials [86]. Whatever the dimensionality of the nanomaterials, it is preferable that the nanostructures are well separated from each other, as an over-aggregation could determine the loss of the nanostructuration with the appearance of properties that are more reminiscent of those of a bulk material.

To this regard, IrO<sup>2</sup> can be synthesized in the form of various types of nanostructures, as nanoparticles with undefined shape, i.e., nanopowders, [87] and nanoparticles with a precise shape, including nanosheets [88], nanorods [5,89], nanotubes [76], nanowires [48,90], and nanoporous films [91,92]. Herein, we provide an overview on the nanostructuration of IrO2, with special emphasis on the strategies pursued for the synthesis of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures. Indeed, up to now many preparation procedures of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures have been described in the literature, including soft- and hard-template routes, hydrothermal synthesis, colloidal methods, and many others. It is worth noting that, within the same preparation method, by finely tuning the experimental parameters, nanostructures with different shapes can also be synthetized. On this basis, we focused our attention on the shapes and morphologies that can be obtained through the different preparation methodologies, since the shape/morphology determine the physical and chemical properties of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures. Furthermore, when available, the performances of these IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures in specific applications will be described.

#### **2. IrO<sup>2</sup> Spherical Nanoparticles and Nanopowder**

The synthesis methods, characterization and description of specific applications of IrO<sup>2</sup> spherical nanoparticles have been brilliantly reported recently by J. Quinson [93]. Interested readers are directed towards his report for a deeper overview, especially for what concerns the analysis about the difficulty to fully distinguish between Ir and IrO<sup>x</sup> nanoparticles during their preparation [93]. Thus, in the following part of this review, we will only focus on the main synthesis pathways used to prepare IrO<sup>2</sup> as nanopowder. Several methods to synthesize IrO<sup>2</sup> nanopowder, meaning nanoparticles with undefined shape, have been experimented. In 2005, Marshall introduced a modification to the well-known polyol method, usually used for the preparation of metallic nanoparticles [94,95]. This procedure consists in dissolving or dispersing the metallic precursor, usually hexachloroiridic acid (H2IrCl6·*n*H2O), in a polyol, such as ethylene glycol, which acts both as solvent and as reducing agent. Upon refluxing the reaction mixture, a metallic precipitate, composed of Ir nanoparticles with an average size of about 3 nm, is formed, which is then filtered and dried. The colloid is finally calcinated to ensure the full oxidation of the obtained product. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 24 which is then filtered and dried. The colloid is finally calcinated to ensure the full oxidation of the obtained product.

Another approach is represented by the Adams fusion method [96], in which the metallic precursor H2IrCl<sup>6</sup> is melted together with NaNO3. The possible reactions that may occur during the process are shown in Scheme 2. Basically, when H2IrCl<sup>6</sup> is melted together with NaNO3, Ir(NO3)<sup>4</sup> is formed. This latter, at high temperature (ca. 460 ◦C) decomposes, thus generating IrO2. Another approach is represented by the Adams fusion method [96], in which the metallic precursor H2IrCl6 is melted together with NaNO3. The possible reactions that may occur during the process are shown in Scheme 2. Basically, when H2IrCl6 is melted together with NaNO3, Ir(NO3)4 is formed. This latter, at high temperature (ca. 460 °C) decomposes, thus generating IrO2.

$$\text{Ir(NO}\_3\text{)}\_4 \quad \xrightarrow{\text{---}} \text{IrO}\_2 + 4\text{NO}\_2 + \text{O}\_2$$

**Scheme 2** The hypothesized reactions taking place in the Adams fusion method [94]. **Scheme 2.** The hypothesized reactions taking place in the Adams fusion method [94].

After cooling, the mixture is thoroughly washed with water to remove salt residues, nitrites, and nitrates. Despite the simplicity of this method, a long purification step is required, and sodium traces may remain in the metal oxide powder. After cooling, the mixture is thoroughly washed with water to remove salt residues, nitrites, and nitrates. Despite the simplicity of this method, a long purification step is required, and sodium traces may remain in the metal oxide powder.

Nanosized IrO2 powder can also be synthesized through the colloidal method [97,98]. This process involves the addition of NaOH to a water solution of the Iridium precursor, H2IrCl6**.** *n*H2O, to induce the formation of an Ir-hydroxide. The resulting colloidal solution is heated at 80–100 °C, then washed, dried, and calcinated at 400 °C to obtain colloidal IrO2, composed of IrO2 nanoparticles with an average size of diameter ca. 7 nm. However, Nanosized IrO<sup>2</sup> powder can also be synthesized through the colloidal method [97,98]. This process involves the addition of NaOH to a water solution of the Iridium precursor, H2IrCl6·*n*H2O, to induce the formation of an Ir-hydroxide. The resulting colloidal solution is heated at 80–100 ◦C, then washed, dried, and calcinated at 400 ◦C to obtain colloidal IrO2, composed of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoparticles with an average size of diameter ca. 7 nm. However,

although the simplicity of the method and the fact that no specific experimental set up is required, the final product remains of a colloid state, thus the nanoparticles are all

(TEM) micrograph (Figure 2). Nevertheless, the as-synthesized nanopowder was tested as electrocatalyst for OER in a solid polymer electrolyte electrolyzer, demonstrating high stability and higher activity with respect to commercial IrO2 powder, which does not

**Figure 2.** TEM micrograph of colloidal IrO2 obtained through the colloidal method

The colloidal method, which involves an initial alkaline hydrolysis of the Iridium precursor (K2IrCl6) in water solution at high temperature, can also be carried out without the calcinations step, thus further simplifying the method, as reported by Khalil et al. [77]. By applying this procedure, IrO2 nanoparticles with an average size of 1–2 nm have been obtained (Figure 3). However, also in this case, the particles are aggregated with each

feature any nanostructuration [97].

(Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [97]).

although the simplicity of the method and the fact that no specific experimental set up is required, the final product remains of a colloid state, thus the nanoparticles are all aggregated to each other as shown in the reported Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) micrograph (Figure 2). Nevertheless, the as-synthesized nanopowder was tested as electrocatalyst for OER in a solid polymer electrolyte electrolyzer, demonstrating high stability and higher activity with respect to commercial IrO<sup>2</sup> powder, which does not feature any nanostructuration [97]. IrO2, composed of IrO2 nanoparticles with an average size of diameter ca. 7 nm. However, although the simplicity of the method and the fact that no specific experimental set up is required, the final product remains of a colloid state, thus the nanoparticles are all aggregated to each other as shown in the reported Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) micrograph (Figure 2). Nevertheless, the as-synthesized nanopowder was tested as electrocatalyst for OER in a solid polymer electrolyte electrolyzer, demonstrating high stability and higher activity with respect to commercial IrO2 powder, which does not feature any nanostructuration [97].

is heated at 80–100 °C, then washed, dried, and calcinated at 400 °C to obtain colloidal

**Scheme 2** The hypothesized reactions taking place in the Adams fusion method [94].

required, and sodium traces may remain in the metal oxide powder.

which is then filtered and dried. The colloid is finally calcinated to ensure the full

Another approach is represented by the Adams fusion method [96], in which the metallic precursor H2IrCl6 is melted together with NaNO3. The possible reactions that may occur during the process are shown in Scheme 2. Basically, when H2IrCl6 is melted together with NaNO3, Ir(NO3)4 is formed. This latter, at high temperature (ca. 460 °C)

After cooling, the mixture is thoroughly washed with water to remove salt residues, nitrites, and nitrates. Despite the simplicity of this method, a long purification step is

Nanosized IrO2 powder can also be synthesized through the colloidal method [97,98]. This process involves the addition of NaOH to a water solution of the Iridium precursor,

*n*H2O, to induce the formation of an Ir-hydroxide. The resulting colloidal solution

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 24

oxidation of the obtained product.

decomposes, thus generating IrO2.

H2IrCl6**.**

**Figure 2.** TEM micrograph of colloidal IrO2 obtained through the colloidal method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [97]). **Figure 2.** TEM micrograph of colloidal IrO<sup>2</sup> obtained through the colloidal method (Reprinted/ adapted with permission from Ref. [97]).

The colloidal method, which involves an initial alkaline hydrolysis of the Iridium precursor (K2IrCl6) in water solution at high temperature, can also be carried out without the calcinations step, thus further simplifying the method, as reported by Khalil et al. [77]. By applying this procedure, IrO2 nanoparticles with an average size of 1–2 nm have been obtained (Figure 3). However, also in this case, the particles are aggregated with each The colloidal method, which involves an initial alkaline hydrolysis of the Iridium precursor (K2IrCl6) in water solution at high temperature, can also be carried out without the calcinations step, thus further simplifying the method, as reported by Khalil et al. [77]. By applying this procedure, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoparticles with an average size of 1–2 nm have been obtained (Figure 3). However, also in this case, the particles are aggregated with each other, due to the absence of a capping agent. The same authors described the preparation of a pH electrode through the electrodeposition of the as-prepared IrO<sup>2</sup> nanopowder on an Au substrate and the evaluation of its potentiometric responses in pH buffer solutions between pH 1.68 to 12.36. The electrode demonstrated excellent pH sensitivity (−73.7 mV/pH unit), with a super-Nernstian response [77]. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 24 other, due to the absence of a capping agent. The same authors described the preparation of a pH electrode through the electrodeposition of the as-prepared IrO2 nanopowder on an Au substrate and the evaluation of its potentiometric responses in pH buffer solutions between pH 1.68 to 12.36. The electrode demonstrated excellent pH sensitivity (−73.7 mV/pH unit), with a super-Nernstian response [77].

**Figure 3.** TEM image of colloidal iridium nanoparticles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [77]). **Figure 3.** TEM image of colloidal iridium nanoparticles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [77]).

Recently, the synthesis of colloidal IrO2 has been also performed through a microwave-assisted route which combines the colloidal and polyol methods, and avoids the calcinations step [87]. Ethylene glycol was used as solvent, whereas NaOH was used

indicating the formation of IrO2 colloidal suspensions. Specifically, the metal oxide was formed when the solution reached its boiling point, without requiring a high temperature treatment in a muffle furnace. The obtained colloidal suspension was stable against flocculation and exhibited a low polydispersity. Moreover, the same method can be carried out in milder reaction conditions, by using alcohols with a low boiling point, such

Finally, nanosized IrO2 powder can be effectively synthesized through the softtemplate route, by using an organic polymer as templating agent [99,100]. Specifically, Zhang et al. described a process in which nanostructuration of Iridium Oxide is achieved by the in-situ polymerization of pyrrole in a water solution containing the Iridium precursor (NH4)2IrCl6, followed by thermal annealing of the nanocomposite (Figure 4) [99]. At a temperature value of 450 °C, the organic part of the composite is totally degraded, and Iridium Oxide nanoparticles, can be recovered. The high surface area displayed by these materials corresponds to a great number of accessible electrochemical sites. Indeed, the as-prepared nanosized Iridium Oxide exhibits a greater electrocatalytic efficiency towards OER, when compared to commercial IrO2 [99]. In particular, the nanostructured iridium oxide exhibits low overpotential (291.3 ± 6 mV) to reach 10 mA/cm2 current density towards OER and higher stability with respect to commercial

as methanol or ethanol, instead of ethylene glycol.

as source of OH-

IrO2.

Recently, the synthesis of colloidal IrO<sup>2</sup> has been also performed through a microwaveassisted route which combines the colloidal and polyol methods, and avoids the calcinations step [87]. Ethylene glycol was used as solvent, whereas NaOH was used as source of OH− anions, to generate the Ir-hydroxide intermediate. The reaction was carried out under microwave irradiation, until the colour solution turned to dark brown, indicating the formation of IrO<sup>2</sup> colloidal suspensions. Specifically, the metal oxide was formed when the solution reached its boiling point, without requiring a high temperature treatment in a muffle furnace. The obtained colloidal suspension was stable against flocculation and exhibited a low polydispersity. Moreover, the same method can be carried out in milder reaction conditions, by using alcohols with a low boiling point, such as methanol or ethanol, instead of ethylene glycol.

Finally, nanosized IrO<sup>2</sup> powder can be effectively synthesized through the softtemplate route, by using an organic polymer as templating agent [99,100]. Specifically, Zhang et al. described a process in which nanostructuration of Iridium Oxide is achieved by the in-situ polymerization of pyrrole in a water solution containing the Iridium precursor (NH4)2IrCl6, followed by thermal annealing of the nanocomposite (Figure 4) [99]. At a temperature value of 450 ◦C, the organic part of the composite is totally degraded, and Iridium Oxide nanoparticles, can be recovered. The high surface area displayed by these materials corresponds to a great number of accessible electrochemical sites. Indeed, the as-prepared nanosized Iridium Oxide exhibits a greater electrocatalytic efficiency towards OER, when compared to commercial IrO<sup>2</sup> [99]. In particular, the nanostructured iridium oxide exhibits low overpotential (291.3 <sup>±</sup> 6 mV) to reach 10 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> current density towards OER and higher stability with respect to commercial IrO2. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 24

**Figure 4.** A schematic representation of the soft-template route for the synthesis of Iridium Oxide nanoparticles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [99]). **Figure 4.** A schematic representation of the soft-template route for the synthesis of Iridium Oxide nanoparticles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [99]).

#### **3. IrO2 1D-Nanostructures 3. IrO<sup>2</sup> 1D-Nanostructures**

1D nanostructures present only one dimension greater than 100 nm, while the others are a few nanometers long. These nanostructures include nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires, and they usually display greater resistance to agglomeration with respect to nanopowder. These elongated structures, as well as nanopowder, exhibit superior properties with respect to bulk materials [86]. Moreover, theoretical studies recently have highlighted the superior electrocatalytic performances of IrO2 1D-nanostructures, specifically IrO2 nanowires, with respect to IrO2 nanospheres, thanks to their regular and periodic structure, without the tendency to agglomeration [71]. In the following part of the review, the IrO2 1D-nanostructures and the main methodologies for their synthesis will be described according to their specific shape. 1D nanostructures present only one dimension greater than 100 nm, while the others are a few nanometers long. These nanostructures include nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires, and they usually display greater resistance to agglomeration with respect to nanopowder. These elongated structures, as well as nanopowder, exhibit superior properties with respect to bulk materials [86]. Moreover, theoretical studies recently have highlighted the superior electrocatalytic performances of IrO<sup>2</sup> 1D-nanostructures, specifically IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires, with respect to IrO<sup>2</sup> nanospheres, thanks to their regular and periodic structure, without the tendency to agglomeration [71]. In the following part of the review, the IrO<sup>2</sup> 1D-nanostructures and the main methodologies for their synthesis will be described according to their specific shape.

#### *3.1. IrO2 Nanotubes 3.1. IrO<sup>2</sup> Nanotubes*

solution [76].

IrO2 nanotubes have been built using a hard-templating route coupled with electrodeposition (Figure 5). Concretely, an anodic aluminium oxide (AAO) layer with large pores was first fabricated through the sputtering of an aluminium layer on a silicon substrate, followed by an anodization process. IrO2 was electrodeposited on this template IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes have been built using a hard-templating route coupled with electrodeposition (Figure 5). Concretely, an anodic aluminium oxide (AAO) layer with large pores was first fabricated through the sputtering of an aluminium layer on a silicon substrate, followed by an anodization process. IrO<sup>2</sup> was electrodeposited on this template layer,

layer, generating nanotubes which grew along the walls of the AAO nanopores. At the end of the process, the AAO template was removed by dissolution in concentrated KOH

**Figure 5.** A schematic representation of the hard-template route for the synthesis of IrO2 nanotubes.

As reported by Chiao et al., the shape and the length of the nanotubes prepared through this method depend on the morphology of the nanoporous AAO template, whereas the wall thickness of the nanotubes is finely controlled by the electrodeposition

generating nanotubes which grew along the walls of the AAO nanopores. At the end of the process, the AAO template was removed by dissolution in concentrated KOH solution [76]. *3.1. IrO2 Nanotubes* 

**Figure 4.** A schematic representation of the soft-template route for the synthesis of Iridium Oxide

1D nanostructures present only one dimension greater than 100 nm, while the others are a few nanometers long. These nanostructures include nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires, and they usually display greater resistance to agglomeration with respect to nanopowder. These elongated structures, as well as nanopowder, exhibit superior properties with respect to bulk materials [86]. Moreover, theoretical studies recently have highlighted the superior electrocatalytic performances of IrO2 1D-nanostructures, specifically IrO2 nanowires, with respect to IrO2 nanospheres, thanks to their regular and periodic structure, without the tendency to agglomeration [71]. In the following part of the review, the IrO2 1D-nanostructures and the main methodologies for their synthesis

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 24

nanoparticles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [99]).

will be described according to their specific shape.

**3. IrO2 1D-Nanostructures** 

As reported by Chiao et al., the shape and the length of the nanotubes prepared through this method depend on the morphology of the nanoporous AAO template, whereas the wall thickness of the nanotubes is finely controlled by the electrodeposition time [76]. The nanotubes obtained by Chiao et al., analysed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), show a diameter of 50 nm and length of around 750 nm. However, the not uncommon presence of defective nanopores in the AAO template, results in the formation of incomplete and collapsed nanotubes together with hollow nanotubes. IrO2 nanotubes have been built using a hard-templating route coupled with electrodeposition (Figure 5). Concretely, an anodic aluminium oxide (AAO) layer with large pores was first fabricated through the sputtering of an aluminium layer on a silicon substrate, followed by an anodization process. IrO2 was electrodeposited on this template layer, generating nanotubes which grew along the walls of the AAO nanopores. At the end of the process, the AAO template was removed by dissolution in concentrated KOH solution [76].

**Figure 5.** A schematic representation of the hard-template route for the synthesis of IrO2 nanotubes. **Figure 5.** A schematic representation of the hard-template route for the synthesis of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes. not uncommon presence of defective nanopores in the AAO template, results in the

As reported by Chiao et al., the shape and the length of the nanotubes prepared through this method depend on the morphology of the nanoporous AAO template, whereas the wall thickness of the nanotubes is finely controlled by the electrodeposition A more uniformly distributed IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes array has been obtained by using the hard template route coupled to an acidic chemical bath, instead of electrodeposition, allowing to produce IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes [101]. Specifically, the AAO template has been soaked in a solution containing the Iridium precursor, Na3IrCl6, in addition to NaClO, HNO<sup>3</sup> and H2O2, generating, in 24 h and after acidic removal of the AAO template, a uniform film, with a thickness of 60 nm and a length of 400 nm, composed of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes (Figure 6). The as-prepared nanotubes array exhibited a large charge storage capacity, measured through electrochemical analysis, proving its potential application as neural-electronic interface electrode [101]. formation of incomplete and collapsed nanotubes together with hollow nanotubes. A more uniformly distributed IrO2 nanotubes array has been obtained by using the hard template route coupled to an acidic chemical bath, instead of electrodeposition, allowing to produce IrO2 nanotubes [101]. Specifically, the AAO template has been soaked in a solution containing the Iridium precursor, Na3IrCl6, in addition to NaClO, HNO3 and H2O2, generating, in 24 h and after acidic removal of the AAO template, a uniform film, with a thickness of 60 nm and a length of 400 nm, composed of IrO2 nanotubes (Figure 6). The as-prepared nanotubes array exhibited a large charge storage capacity, measured through electrochemical analysis, proving its potential application as neural-electronic interface electrode [101].

**Figure 6.** SEM image of IrO2 nanotubes array (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [101]). **Figure 6.** SEM image of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes array (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [101]).

Recently, IrO2 nanotubes have been synthesized without a hard template, by electrospinning and calcination techniques [102]. Specifically, a solution containing the Recently, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes have been synthesized without a hard template, by electrospinning and calcination techniques [102]. Specifically, a solution containing the Iridium

Iridium precursor IrCl3 was electrospun on an aluminium plate, then calcinated at 500 °C,

contains poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), which, as stated by the authors, acts as a "framework", and is removed through the thermal annealing. The as-synthetized IrO2 nanotubes were tested as electrode material for amperometric CO sensing, but they resulted in poorly electroactive towards electrochemical CO oxidation, in contrast to the metallic counterparts, i.e., Ir nanotubes that were produced by the reduction, under H2

Finally, IrO2 nanotubes can be efficiently prepared through Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) [103]. This method, however, requires a specifically designed reactor in which ultra-pure gases are injected to transport and react with the organometallic precursor. By applying this methodology, IrO2 nanotubes have been successfully grown on a LiTaO3 substrate using a low-melting Iridium source, (Methylcyclopentadienyl) (1,5-cyclooctadiene) Iridium(I), [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] (chemical structure reported in Figure 7), a high oxygen pressure (20–50 Torr), and a temperature of ca. 350 °C [103]. The as-obtained nanostructures, presenting an unusual square crosssection, present a tilt angle of 35° ca. with respect to the normal to the substrate surface

and Ar flow, of the as-prepared IrO2 nanotubes.

and are perfectly aligned with each other (Figure 7a).

precursor IrCl<sup>3</sup> was electrospun on an aluminium plate, then calcinated at 500 ◦C, under O<sup>2</sup> and He flow, recovering IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes after cooling. However, although the authors claim to prepare IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes without any template, the initial solution also contains poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), which, as stated by the authors, acts as a "framework", and is removed through the thermal annealing. The as-synthetized IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes were tested as electrode material for amperometric CO sensing, but they resulted in poorly electroactive towards electrochemical CO oxidation, in contrast to the metallic counterparts, i.e., Ir nanotubes that were produced by the reduction, under H<sup>2</sup> and Ar flow, of the as-prepared IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes.

Finally, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes can be efficiently prepared through Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) [103]. This method, however, requires a specifically designed reactor in which ultra-pure gases are injected to transport and react with the organometallic precursor. By applying this methodology, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes have been successfully grown on a LiTaO<sup>3</sup> substrate using a low-melting Iridium source, (Methylcyclopentadienyl) (1,5 cyclooctadiene) Iridium(I), [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] (chemical structure reported in Figure 7), a high oxygen pressure (20–50 Torr), and a temperature of ca. 350 ◦C [103]. The as-obtained nanostructures, presenting an unusual square cross-section, present a tilt angle of 35◦ ca. with respect to the normal to the substrate surface and are perfectly aligned with each other (Figure 7a). *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 24

**Figure 7.** Chemical structure of [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] and SEM micrographs at different magnifications of IrO2 nanotubes synthetized through MOCVD, a) top view of IrO2 nanotubes, b) a wedge-shaped rod (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [103]). **Figure 7.** Chemical structure of [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] and SEM micrographs at different magnifications of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes synthetized through MOCVD, (**a**) top view of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes, (**b**) a wedge-shaped rod (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [103]).

Notably, by opportunely modifying the experimental parameters used during the MOCVD, the same authors were able to finely tune the shape of the obtained nanotubes, thus obtaining forms ranging from nearly-triangular nanorods, wedge-like nanorods (Fig. 7b) and scrolled nanotubes of IrO2. Indeed, the growth of these peculiar structures, and in particular their shape, is highly dependent on the substrate temperature and the degree of supersaturation, this latter being controlled by the temperature of the precursor reservoir [104]. Interestingly, these square hollowed IrO2 nanotubes grown onto sapphire (100) substrate were successfully reduced to mixed Ir-IrO2 nanotubes by high vacuum thermal annealing. Moreover, a Pt electrodeposition was carried-out on these nanotubes to generate a new nanostructured catalyst for methanol oxidation, with activity comparable to that of a commercial PtRu catalyst [105]. Notably, by opportunely modifying the experimental parameters used during the MOCVD, the same authors were able to finely tune the shape of the obtained nanotubes, thus obtaining forms ranging from nearly-triangular nanorods, wedge-like nanorods (Figure 7b) and scrolled nanotubes of IrO2. Indeed, the growth of these peculiar structures, and in particular their shape, is highly dependent on the substrate temperature and the degree of supersaturation, this latter being controlled by the temperature of the precursor reservoir [104]. Interestingly, these square hollowed IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes grown onto sapphire (100) substrate were successfully reduced to mixed Ir-IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes by high vacuum thermal annealing. Moreover, a Pt electrodeposition was carried-out on these nanotubes to generate a new nanostructured catalyst for methanol oxidation, with activity comparable to that of a commercial PtRu catalyst [105].

#### *3.2. IrO2 Nanorods 3.2. IrO<sup>2</sup> Nanorods*

IrCl4 + OH-

AAO membranes [89].

IrO2 nanorods can be produced through several techniques, including the hard-template route [89], the "molten salt" method [106], and MOCVD [5]. In particular, similarly to IrO2 nanotubes [76,101], arrays of IrO2 nanorods have been synthetized using AAO membranes as hard template [89]. In these cases, the porous AAO membrane has been soaked in an alkaline chemical bath, containing IrCl4, as Iridium precursor, and K2CO3 as source of OH- anions. The temperature was increased to 95 °C, allowing the reactions reported in Scheme 3 to take place. Basically, the OH- anions which derived from the reac-IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods can be produced through several techniques, including the hardtemplate route [89], the "molten salt" method [106], and MOCVD [5]. In particular, similarly to IrO<sup>2</sup> nanotubes [76,101], arrays of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods have been synthetized using AAO membranes as hard template [89]. In these cases, the porous AAO membrane has been soaked in an alkaline chemical bath, containing IrCl4, as Iridium precursor, and K2CO<sup>3</sup> as source of OH− anions. The temperature was increased to 95 ◦C, allowing the reactions reported in Scheme 3 to take place. Basically, the OH− anions which derived from the

tion of K2CO3 with water, react with the Iridium precursor generating the Ir-hydroxyde

+ 2OH- + CO2

**Scheme 3.** The reactions taking place in the chemical bath method to synthetize IrO2 nanorods on

The IrO2 nanoparticles are grown and packed inside the pores of the AAO membrane, forming well-aligned elongated nanostructures, i.e., nanorods, which have been characterized through electronic microscopy after the removal of the template with KOH (Figure 8). Specifically, the IrO2 nanorods grew perpendicular to the substrate and present a diameter ranging from 80 to 100 nm, approximately corresponding to the AAO pores dimensions [107]. This IrO2 nanorods array has been tested as neurotransmitter sensor, displaying a good response to dopamine, chosen as a neurotransmitter model [89].

intermediate which evolves towards the formation of IrO2.

IrO2 + H2O + Cl-

reaction of K2CO<sup>3</sup> with water, react with the Iridium precursor generating the Ir-hydroxyde intermediate which evolves towards the formation of IrO2. tion of K2CO3 with water, react with the Iridium precursor generating the Ir-hydroxyde intermediate which evolves towards the formation of IrO2.

**Figure 7.** Chemical structure of [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] and SEM micrographs at different magnifications of IrO2 nanotubes synthetized through MOCVD, a) top view of IrO2 nanotubes, b) a wedge-shaped

Notably, by opportunely modifying the experimental parameters used during the MOCVD, the same authors were able to finely tune the shape of the obtained nanotubes, thus obtaining forms ranging from nearly-triangular nanorods, wedge-like nanorods (Fig. 7b) and scrolled nanotubes of IrO2. Indeed, the growth of these peculiar structures, and in particular their shape, is highly dependent on the substrate temperature and the degree of supersaturation, this latter being controlled by the temperature of the precursor reservoir [104]. Interestingly, these square hollowed IrO2 nanotubes grown onto sapphire (100) substrate were successfully reduced to mixed Ir-IrO2 nanotubes by high vacuum thermal annealing. Moreover, a Pt electrodeposition was carried-out on these nanotubes to generate a new nanostructured catalyst for methanol oxidation, with activity comparable to that

IrO2 nanorods can be produced through several techniques, including the hard-template route [89], the "molten salt" method [106], and MOCVD [5]. In particular, similarly to IrO2 nanotubes [76,101], arrays of IrO2 nanorods have been synthetized using AAO membranes as hard template [89]. In these cases, the porous AAO membrane has been soaked in an alkaline chemical bath, containing IrCl4, as Iridium precursor, and K2CO3 as source of OH- anions. The temperature was increased to 95 °C, allowing the reactions reported in Scheme 3 to take place. Basically, the OH- anions which derived from the reac-

K2CO3 + H2O 2K<sup>+</sup> + 2OH- + CO2 IrCl4 + OH- IrO2 + H2O + Cl-

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 24

rod (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [103]).

of a commercial PtRu catalyst [105].

*3.2. IrO2 Nanorods* 

**Scheme 3.** The reactions taking place in the chemical bath method to synthetize IrO2 nanorods on AAO membranes [89]. **Scheme 3.** The reactions taking place in the chemical bath method to synthetize IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods on AAO membranes [89].

The IrO2 nanoparticles are grown and packed inside the pores of the AAO membrane, forming well-aligned elongated nanostructures, i.e., nanorods, which have been characterized through electronic microscopy after the removal of the template with KOH (Figure 8). Specifically, the IrO2 nanorods grew perpendicular to the substrate and present a diameter ranging from 80 to 100 nm, approximately corresponding to the AAO pores dimensions [107]. This IrO2 nanorods array has been tested as neurotransmitter sensor, displaying a good response to dopamine, chosen as a neurotransmitter model [89]. The IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoparticles are grown and packed inside the pores of the AAO membrane, forming well-aligned elongated nanostructures, i.e., nanorods, which have been characterized through electronic microscopy after the removal of the template with KOH (Figure 8). Specifically, the IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods grew perpendicular to the substrate and present a diameter ranging from 80 to 100 nm, approximately corresponding to the AAO pores dimensions [107]. This IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods array has been tested as neurotransmitter sensor, displaying a good response to dopamine, chosen as a neurotransmitter model [89]. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 24

**Figure 8.** SEM micrographs of IrO2 nanorods synthetized through the chemical bath route: (**a**) top view; (**b**) tilted view (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [107]). **Figure 8.** SEM micrographs of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods synthetized through the chemical bath route: (**a**) top view; (**b**) tilted view (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [107]).

IrO2 nanorods can also be synthesized through the "molten salt" method, a synthetic route similar to the Adams fusions, consisting of the grinding of the Iridium precursor (IrCl4) with NaCl and KCl, followed by the calcinations of the solid mixture at high temperature (600 °C) for 12 h [106]. Through this procedure, Mao et al. obtained nanostructures with an average diameter of 15 nm and length of ca. 200 nm (Figure 9) [106]. However, this method, similarly to the above-described Adams fusion synthesis of IrO2 nanopowder, required long purification and drying processes. The same authors reported a high electrocatalytic activity of the produced IrO2 nanorods towards OER, probably attributed to high specific area of the material. Indeed, IrO2 NRs generate higher OER current density (70 mA/cm2) than the commercial IrO2 (58 mA/cm2) at 0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl electrode in deaerated 0.5 M KOH electrolyte. IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods can also be synthesized through the "molten salt" method, a synthetic route similar to the Adams fusions, consisting of the grinding of the Iridium precursor (IrCl4) with NaCl and KCl, followed by the calcinations of the solid mixture at high temperature (600 ◦C) for 12 h [106]. Through this procedure, Mao et al. obtained nanostructures with an average diameter of 15 nm and length of ca. 200 nm (Figure 9) [106]. However, this method, similarly to the above-described Adams fusion synthesis of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanopowder, required long purification and drying processes. The same authors reported a high electrocatalytic activity of the produced IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods towards OER, probably attributed to high specific area of the material. Indeed, IrO<sup>2</sup> NRs generate higher OER current density (70 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> ) than the commercial IrO<sup>2</sup> (58 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> ) at 0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl electrode in deaerated 0.5 M KOH electrolyte.

Interestingly, within the molten salt method, by carefully varying the IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio, it is possible to tune the morphology of the IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures [108]. In particular,

**Figure 9.** TEM image of IrO2 nanorods obtained through the molten salt method (Re-

Interestingly, within the molten salt method, by carefully varying the IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio, it is possible to tune the morphology of the IrO2 nanostructures [108]. In particular, it has been reported that, using a IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio of 1: 10: 10, nanocubes are obtained (Figure 10a); while changing the IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio to 1: 30: 30, a mixture of IrO2 nanocubes and nanorods is formed (Figure 10b); and ultimately, using a high salts percentage, specifically using a 1: 60: 60 ratio, a sample consisting predominantly of nanorods is obtained (Figure 10c). This experimental observation was explained by Mao et

printed/adapted with permission from Ref. [106]).

it has been reported that, using a IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio of 1: 10: 10, nanocubes are obtained (Figure 10a); while changing the IrCl4: NaCl: KCl ratio to 1: 30: 30, a mixture of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanocubes and nanorods is formed (Figure 10b); and ultimately, using a high salts percentage, specifically using a 1: 60: 60 ratio, a sample consisting predominantly of nanorods is obtained (Figure 10c). This experimental observation was explained by Mao et al. considering that the molten salts act both as solvent and as protective layers against aggregation of the formed nanoparticles [108]. Therefore, when the content of salts is low, the growth of nanostructures is allowed in all directions, thus nanocubes can be generated; conversely, when a higher salts percentage is used, the excess of salts block the growth of the nanostructures in all directions, except one, thus nanorods are preferentially formed. Also in this case, the obtained IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods proved to be excellent electrocatalysts towards OER, displaying high current density, low overpotential, high stability and numerous accessible active sites [108]. The electrocatalytic performance of IrO<sup>2</sup> was again better than commercially available IrO2. **Figure 8.** SEM micrographs of IrO2 nanorods synthetized through the chemical bath route: (**a**) top view; (**b**) tilted view (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [107]). IrO2 nanorods can also be synthesized through the "molten salt" method, a synthetic route similar to the Adams fusions, consisting of the grinding of the Iridium precursor (IrCl4) with NaCl and KCl, followed by the calcinations of the solid mixture at high temperature (600 °C) for 12 h [106]. Through this procedure, Mao et al. obtained nanostructures with an average diameter of 15 nm and length of ca. 200 nm (Figure 9) [106]. However, this method, similarly to the above-described Adams fusion synthesis of IrO2 nanopowder, required long purification and drying processes. The same authors reported a high electrocatalytic activity of the produced IrO2 nanorods towards OER, probably attributed to high specific area of the material. Indeed, IrO2 NRs generate higher OER current density (70 mA/cm2) than the commercial IrO2 (58 mA/cm2) at 0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl electrode in deaerated 0.5 M KOH electrolyte.

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 24

**Figure 9.** TEM image of IrO2 nanorods obtained through the molten salt method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [106]). **Figure 9.** TEM image of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods obtained through the molten salt method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [106]). lysts towards OER, displaying high current density, low overpotential, high stability and numerous accessible active sites [108]. The electrocatalytic performance of IrO2 was again better than commercially available IrO2.

**Figure 10.** SEM image of the different IrO2 nanostructures obtained through the molten salt method: (**a**) nanocubes, (**b**) mixture of nanocubes and nanorods, (**c**) nanorods (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [108]). **Figure 10.** SEM image of the different IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures obtained through the molten salt method: (**a**) nanocubes, (**b**) mixture of nanocubes and nanorods, (**c**) nanorods (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [108]).

IrO2 nanorods have been also produced through MOCVD technique. In this case, IrO2 nanorods were grown on Si substrates using a low-melting Iridium source, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)], a high oxygen pressure (10–60 Torr) and a temperature of ca. 350 °C [5,109]. These as-produced IrO2 nanorods present diameters between 75 and 150 nm, a wedge-shaped morphology and naturally formed sharp tips (Figure 11). However, these nanorods show a polycrystalline nature, characterized by many defects and dislocations. IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods have been also produced through MOCVD technique. In this case, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods were grown on Si substrates using a low-melting Iridium source, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)], a high oxygen pressure (10–60 Torr) and a temperature of ca. 350 ◦C [5,109]. These asproduced IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods present diameters between 75 and 150 nm, a wedge-shaped morphology and naturally formed sharp tips (Figure 11). However, these nanorods show a polycrystalline nature, characterized by many defects and dislocations.

with this method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [5]).

**Figure 11.** Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy images of the IrO2 nanorods fabricated

The MOCVD technique can also be exploited to obtain another type of 1D structures, i.e., IrO2 nanowires, when the experimental parameters are adequately tuned [104,110]. For this purpose, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] as iridium source, oxygen as both carrier and reactant gas, high temperature (350–400 °C) and high pressure (33 Torr) were needed. By applying these conditions, Zhang et al. synthetized single crystal IrO2 nanowires, having rutile structure, on plasma treated SiO2 substrates covered with a thin metallic layer (Ti, Au, Ni, Co) [110]. The as-obtained nanowires have dimension ranging from 10 to 50 nm in diam-

*3.3. IrO2 Nanowires/Nanofibres* 

eter and 1–2 mm in length (Figure 12).

better than commercially available IrO2.

mission from Ref. [108]).

**Figure 11.** Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy images of the IrO2 nanorods fabricated with this method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [5]). **Figure 11.** Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy images of the IrO<sup>2</sup> nanorods fabricated with this method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [5]).

al. considering that the molten salts act both as solvent and as protective layers against aggregation of the formed nanoparticles [108]. Therefore, when the content of salts is low, the growth of nanostructures is allowed in all directions, thus nanocubes can be generated; conversely, when a higher salts percentage is used, the excess of salts block the growth of the nanostructures in all directions, except one, thus nanorods are preferentially formed. Also in this case, the obtained IrO2 nanorods proved to be excellent electrocatalysts towards OER, displaying high current density, low overpotential, high stability and numerous accessible active sites [108]. The electrocatalytic performance of IrO2 was again

**Figure 10.** SEM image of the different IrO2 nanostructures obtained through the molten salt method: (**a**) nanocubes, (**b**) mixture of nanocubes and nanorods, (**c**) nanorods (Reprinted/adapted with per-

IrO2 nanorods have been also produced through MOCVD technique. In this case, IrO2 nanorods were grown on Si substrates using a low-melting Iridium source, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)], a high oxygen pressure (10–60 Torr) and a temperature of ca. 350 °C [5,109]. These as-produced IrO2 nanorods present diameters between 75 and 150 nm, a wedge-shaped morphology and naturally formed sharp tips (Figure 11). However, these nanorods show a polycrystalline nature, characterized by many defects and dislocations.

#### *3.3. IrO2 Nanowires/Nanofibres 3.3. IrO<sup>2</sup> Nanowires/Nanofibres*

The MOCVD technique can also be exploited to obtain another type of 1D structures, i.e., IrO2 nanowires, when the experimental parameters are adequately tuned [104,110]. For this purpose, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] as iridium source, oxygen as both carrier and reactant gas, high temperature (350–400 °C) and high pressure (33 Torr) were needed. By applying these conditions, Zhang et al. synthetized single crystal IrO2 nanowires, having rutile structure, on plasma treated SiO2 substrates covered with a thin metallic layer (Ti, Au, Ni, Co) [110]. The as-obtained nanowires have dimension ranging from 10 to 50 nm in diameter and 1–2 mm in length (Figure 12). The MOCVD technique can also be exploited to obtain another type of 1D structures, i.e., IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires, when the experimental parameters are adequately tuned [104,110]. For this purpose, [(MeCp)Ir(COD)] as iridium source, oxygen as both carrier and reactant gas, high temperature (350–400 ◦C) and high pressure (33 Torr) were needed. By applying these conditions, Zhang et al. synthetized single crystal IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires, having rutile structure, on plasma treated SiO<sup>2</sup> substrates covered with a thin metallic layer (Ti, Au, Ni, Co) [110]. The as-obtained nanowires have dimension ranging from 10 to 50 nm in diameter and 1–2 mm in length (Figure 12). *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 24

**Figure 12.** SEM image of IrO2 nanowires obtained through MOCVD (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [110]). **Figure 12.** SEM image of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires obtained through MOCVD (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [110]).

IrO2 nanowires were also grown on Au microwire and Si/SiO2 substrates via Vapor Phase Transport [48]. IrO2 powder was used as source material and placed in a quartz tube furnace under He and O2 flow. Working at very high temperature (ca. 1000 °C) allows the precursor to sublimate and to be transported by the gas flow to the substrates, where recrystallization occurs in the form of nanowires. Kim et al. reported the preparation of single crystal IrO2 nanowires, displaying lateral dimensions ranging from 20 to 100 nm IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires were also grown on Au microwire and Si/SiO<sup>2</sup> substrates via Vapor Phase Transport [48]. IrO<sup>2</sup> powder was used as source material and placed in a quartz tube furnace under He and O<sup>2</sup> flow. Working at very high temperature (ca. 1000 ◦C) allows the precursor to sublimate and to be transported by the gas flow to the substrates, where recrystallization occurs in the form of nanowires. Kim et al. reported the preparation of single crystal IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires, displaying lateral dimensions ranging from 20 to 100 nm near

near the nanowire tip, with the length extending up to tens of micrometers [48]. Through this method, the formation of nanowires is strongly affected by the O2 flow. Indeed, with-

been obtained by using an O2 flow rate within the range from 10 to 15 sccm. The electrochemical performance of the IrO2 nanowires grown on the Au microwire was also tested as microelectrode, showing a linear pH response with a super-Nernstian behaviour [48]. IrO2 nanofibres can be successfully formed through the electrospinning technique [111]. Iridium chloride can be dissolved in ethanol-water together with PVP. The electrospinning of the resulting solution allows the formation of nanofibres of diameter ranging between 50 and 150 nm of diameter (Figure 13a). These as-deposited nanofibres were directly employed for the electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid [112]. More, recently, based on the same synthetic protocol but carrying out a thermal annealing after deposition to ensure the complete removal of the polymer content, amorphous hollow nanofibres of IrO2 were produced that were of an average diameter of ca. 60 nm (Figure 13b) and were successfully employed for the fabrication of a flexible solid-state gel symmetric superca-

pacitor [78].

the nanowire tip, with the length extending up to tens of micrometers [48]. Through this method, the formation of nanowires is strongly affected by the O<sup>2</sup> flow. Indeed, without O<sup>2</sup> flow, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires are not formed, whereas with a high O<sup>2</sup> flow (50 sccm) polyhedral IrO<sup>2</sup> crystals are generated. IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires, presenting random orientations have been obtained by using an O<sup>2</sup> flow rate within the range from 10 to 15 sccm. The electrochemical performance of the IrO<sup>2</sup> nanowires grown on the Au microwire was also tested as microelectrode, showing a linear pH response with a super-Nernstian behaviour [48].

IrO<sup>2</sup> nanofibres can be successfully formed through the electrospinning technique [111]. Iridium chloride can be dissolved in ethanol-water together with PVP. The electrospinning of the resulting solution allows the formation of nanofibres of diameter ranging between 50 and 150 nm of diameter (Figure 13a). These as-deposited nanofibres were directly employed for the electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid [112]. More, recently, based on the same synthetic protocol but carrying out a thermal annealing after deposition to ensure the complete removal of the polymer content, amorphous hollow nanofibres of IrO<sup>2</sup> were produced that were of an average diameter of ca. 60 nm (Figure 13b) and were successfully employed for the fabrication of a flexible solid-state gel symmetric supercapacitor [78]. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 24

**Figure 13.** (**a**) nanofibres IrO2/PVP synthesised through electrospinning (adapted from ref. [111]; (**b**) Hollow nanofibres of IrO2 after thermal annealing at 300 °C (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [78]). **Figure 13.** (**a**) nanofibres IrO2/PVP synthesised through electrospinning (adapted from ref. [111]; (**b**) Hollow nanofibres of IrO<sup>2</sup> after thermal annealing at 300 ◦C (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [78]).

#### **4. IrO2 Nanostructures with Unusual Shapes 4. IrO<sup>2</sup> Nanostructures with Unusual Shapes**

The preparation and characterization of IrO2 nanostructures with unusual shapes have been recently reported. In particular, urchin-like IrO2 nanostructures have been synthetized through a hydrothermal method, involving the pre-treatment of an aqueous solution of IrCl3 with NaOH and H2O2 at 100 °C, followed by heat treatment of the solution at 160–200 °C in autoclave [113]. The urchin-like nanostructures are composed by more levels of structures, specifically short needles, and small cores (Figure 14). By monitoring the hydrothermal synthesis over time, Deng et al. demonstrated that first nanosized IrO2 spheres with a rough surface are formed upon which thin needles grow in a fractal manner [113]. The urchin-like IrO2 nanostructures thus obtained have been tested as a catalyst for OER in acidic medium, demonstrating excellent activity and stability in acidic medium, attributable to their hierarchical structure. Indeed, the authors demonstrated that these nanostructures possess improved electrochemical surface-active area with respect to plain spherical IrO2 structures of a similar size. The preparation and characterization of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures with unusual shapes have been recently reported. In particular, urchin-like IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures have been synthetized through a hydrothermal method, involving the pre-treatment of an aqueous solution of IrCl<sup>3</sup> with NaOH and H2O<sup>2</sup> at 100 ◦C, followed by heat treatment of the solution at 160–200 ◦C in autoclave [113]. The urchin-like nanostructures are composed by more levels of structures, specifically short needles, and small cores (Figure 14). By monitoring the hydrothermal synthesis over time, Deng et al. demonstrated that first nanosized IrO<sup>2</sup> spheres with a rough surface are formed upon which thin needles grow in a fractal manner [113]. The urchin-like IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructures thus obtained have been tested as a catalyst for OER in acidic medium, demonstrating excellent activity and stability in acidic medium, attributable to their hierarchical structure. Indeed, the authors demonstrated that these nanostructures possess improved electrochemical surface-active area with respect to plain spherical IrO<sup>2</sup> structures of a similar size.

Moreover, IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoneedles with an average diameter of 2 nm (Figure 15), have been produced through a modified Adams fusion route, implying the use of 2-mercaptoethylamine (chemical structure reported in Figure 15) in addition to NaNO<sup>3</sup> [75]. In this case, the presence of 2-mercaptoethylamine specifically determines the formation of nanoneedles rather than nanopowder. Indeed, without 2-mercaptoethylamine, unshaped and aggregate nanoparticles, like those obtained with the classical Adams fusion method, were obtained. Furthermore, by enhancing the amount of 2-mercaptoethylamine, an increase of the nanoneedles aspect ratio occurs. Also, for IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoneedles, the OER activity has been evaluated, verifying a

**Figure 14.** SEM image of urchin-like IrO2 nanostructures (Reprinted/adapted with permission

Moreover, IrO2 nanoneedles with an average diameter of 2 nm (Figure 15), have been produced through a modified Adams fusion route, implying the use of 2-mercaptoethylamine (chemical structure reported in Figure 15) in addition to NaNO3 [75]. In this case, the presence of 2-mercaptoethylamine specifically determines the formation of nanoneedles rather than nanopowder. Indeed, without 2-mercaptoethylamine, unshaped and aggregate nanoparticles, like those obtained with the classical Adams fusion method, were obtained. Furthermore, by enhancing the amount of 2-mercaptoethylamine, an increase of the nanoneedles aspect ratio occurs. Also, for IrO2 nanoneedles, the OER activity has been evaluated, verifying a better performance with respect to unshaped nanoparticles. However, the exact role of 2-mercaptoethylamine to direct the preferential growth

into nanoneedles has not been reported.

from Ref. [113]).

better performance with respect to unshaped nanoparticles. However, the exact role of 2 mercaptoethylamine to direct the preferential growth into nanoneedles has not been reported. dium, attributable to their hierarchical structure. Indeed, the authors demonstrated that these nanostructures possess improved electrochemical surface-active area with respect to plain spherical IrO2 structures of a similar size.

**Figure 13.** (**a**) nanofibres IrO2/PVP synthesised through electrospinning (adapted from ref. [111]; (**b**) Hollow nanofibres of IrO2 after thermal annealing at 300 °C (Reprinted/adapted with permission

The preparation and characterization of IrO2 nanostructures with unusual shapes have been recently reported. In particular, urchin-like IrO2 nanostructures have been synthetized through a hydrothermal method, involving the pre-treatment of an aqueous solution of IrCl3 with NaOH and H2O2 at 100 °C, followed by heat treatment of the solution at 160–200 °C in autoclave [113]. The urchin-like nanostructures are composed by more levels of structures, specifically short needles, and small cores (Figure 14). By monitoring the hydrothermal synthesis over time, Deng et al. demonstrated that first nanosized IrO2 spheres with a rough surface are formed upon which thin needles grow in a fractal manner [113]. The urchin-like IrO2 nanostructures thus obtained have been tested as a catalyst for OER in acidic medium, demonstrating excellent activity and stability in acidic me-

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 24

**4. IrO2 Nanostructures with Unusual Shapes** 

from Ref. [78]).

*Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 24

Moreover, IrO2 nanoneedles with an average diameter of 2 nm (Figure 15), have been

**Figure 15.** Chemical structure of 2-mercaptoethylamine and TEM image of the IrO2 nanoneedles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [75]). **Figure 15.** Chemical structure of 2-mercaptoethylamine and TEM image of the IrO<sup>2</sup> nanoneedles (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [75]). (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [75]). **5. IrO2 Nanostructured Films** 

#### **5. IrO2 Nanostructured Films 5. IrO<sup>2</sup> Nanostructured Films** IrO2 thin films can be prepared through several techniques, ranging from the hard

16).

IrO2 thin films can be prepared through several techniques, ranging from the hard template route [114], to spray pyrolysis [70], to reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering [43]. However, the easiest way to introduce a nanostructuration in a metal oxide film, also in an IrO2 film, is the Evaporation Induced Self-Assembly method (EISA) (Figure IrO<sup>2</sup> thin films can be prepared through several techniques, ranging from the hard template route [114], to spray pyrolysis [70], to reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering [43]. However, the easiest way to introduce a nanostructuration in a metal oxide film, also in an IrO<sup>2</sup> film, is the Evaporation Induced Self-Assembly method (EISA) (Figure 16). template route [114], to spray pyrolysis [70], to reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering [43]. However, the easiest way to introduce a nanostructuration in a metal oxide film, also in an IrO2 film, is the Evaporation Induced Self-Assembly method (EISA) (Figure 16).

**Figure 16.** Schematic representation of EISA (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [115]). **Figure 16.** Schematic representation of EISA (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [115]). oxide)-poly(butadiene)-poly(ethylene oxide, chemical structure reported in Figure 17), as **Figure 16.** Schematic representation of EISA (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [115]).

The EISA route involves the use of a soft template, usually an ionic organic surfactant

structures. These latter can be formed of spherical micelles, hexagonal rods, lamellar liquid crystals or other assemblies in solution that self-organise through non-covalent weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic effect. Furthermore, these interactions are also driven by evaporation of the solvent that occurs in situ to the deposition. Hence, these assemblies are the structural directing agents for the formation of inorganic mesostructures. Indeed, the sol–gel precursor hydrolyzes and condenses around the mesostructured self-assembled phase. Subsequent thermal treatment induces the removal of the surfactant, the stiffening of the inorganic network and its crystallization. By varying the type of surfactant, its concentration in the starting solution, and the deposition conditions, it is possible to tune the pore structure and size of the porous materials. EISA is generally coupled with dip-coating or spincoating deposition techniques, which allow the formation of a thin layer of precursor on different substrates. Through this procedure, Ortel et al. successfully synthesized IrO2 thin films on different substrates by dip-coating, employing PEOy-PBx-PEOy, (poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(butadiene)-poly(ethylene oxide, chemical structure reported in Figure 17), as

uid crystals or other assemblies in solution that self-organise through non-covalent weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic effect. Furthermore, these interactions are also driven by evaporation of the solvent that occurs in situ to the deposition. Hence, these assemblies are the structural directing agents for the formation of inorganic mesostructures. Indeed, the sol–gel precursor hydrolyzes and condenses around the mesostructured self-assembled phase. Subsequent thermal treatment induces the removal of the surfactant, the stiffening of the inorganic network and its crystallization. By varying the type of surfactant, its concentration in the starting solution, and the deposition conditions, it is possible to tune the pore structure and size of the porous materials. EISA is generally coupled with dip-coating or spincoating deposition techniques, which allow the formation of a thin layer of precursor on different substrates. Through this procedure, Ortel et al. successfully synthesized IrO2 thin films on different substrates by dip-coating, employing PEOy-PBx-PEOy, (poly(ethylene

The EISA route involves the use of a soft template, usually an ionic organic surfactant or non-ionic polymeric surfactant which self-assembles into a diversity of supramolecular structures. These latter can be formed of spherical micelles, hexagonal rods, lamellar liquid crystals or other assemblies in solution that self-organise through non-covalent weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic effect. Furthermore, these interactions are also driven by evaporation of the solvent that occurs in situ to the deposition. Hence, these assemblies are the structural directing agents for the formation of inorganic mesostructures. Indeed, the sol–gel precursor hydrolyzes and condenses around the mesostructured self-assembled phase. Subsequent thermal treatment induces the removal of the surfactant, the stiffening of the inorganic network and its crystallization. By varying the type of surfactant, its concentration in the starting solution, and the deposition conditions, it is possible to tune the pore structure and size of the porous materials. EISA is generally coupled with dip-coating or spincoating deposition techniques, which allow the formation of a thin layer of precursor on different substrates. Through this procedure, Ortel et al. successfully synthesized IrO<sup>2</sup> thin films on different substrates by dip-coating, employing PEOy-PBx-PEOy, (poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(butadiene)-poly(ethylene oxide, chemical structure reported in Figure 17), as templating agent [91,116]. These films presented nanocrystalline mesopores walls and some areas with locally ordered pores (Figure 17). Moreover, their electrocatalytic performance toward OER was tested and compared to untemplated IrO<sup>2</sup> films obtained with the same experimental procedure. The current response on templated IrO<sup>2</sup> films is about 2.1 times higher with respect to the untemplated IrO<sup>2</sup> films, demonstrating the nanostructuration advantages. *Inorganics* **2022**, *10*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 16 of 24 templating agent [91,116]. These films presented nanocrystalline mesopores walls and some areas with locally ordered pores (Figure 17). Moreover, their electrocatalytic performance toward OER was tested and compared to untemplated IrO2 films obtained with the same experimental procedure. The current response on templated IrO2 films is about 2.1 times higher with respect to the untemplated IrO2 films, demonstrating the nanostructuration advantages.

**Figure 17.** SEM images of IrO2 mesoporous thin film template with PEOy-PBx-PEOy and calcinated at 500 °C (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]). **Figure 17.** SEM images of IrO<sup>2</sup> mesoporous thin film template with PEOy-PBx-PEO<sup>y</sup> and calcinated at 500 ◦C (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]).

Similarly, Chandra et al. developed mesoporous IrO2 thin films choosing the triblock copolymer "Pluronic F127" (PEO106PPO70PEO106, chemical structure reported in Figure 18), as structural directing agent and spin-coating as deposition technique [74,117]. They reported that samples calcinated at 400 °C present 2D hexagonal mesostructure (*p*6*mm* symmetry, Figure 18), but an increase in treatment temperature entails the transformation into a disordered mesostructure. The enhancement of the electrocatalytic performance toward OER with respect to the untemplated IrO2 electrode was ca. 2 times higher for mesoporous structure and was ascribed to the larger accessible surface-to-volume ratio. Similarly, Chandra et al. developed mesoporous IrO<sup>2</sup> thin films choosing the triblock copolymer "Pluronic F127" (PEO106PPO70PEO106, chemical structure reported in Figure 18), as structural directing agent and spin-coating as deposition technique [74,117]. They reported that samples calcinated at 400 ◦C present 2D hexagonal mesostructure (*p*6*mm* symmetry, Figure 18), but an increase in treatment temperature entails the transformation into a disordered mesostructure. The enhancement of the electrocatalytic performance toward OER with respect to the untemplated IrO<sup>2</sup> electrode was ca. 2 times higher for mesoporous structure and was ascribed to the larger accessible surface-to-volume ratio.

**Figure 18.** TEM images of mesoporous IrO2 films template with PEO106PPO70PEO106 recorded along the (**a**) [100] and (**b**) [110] axes of the 2D hexagonal structure (Reprinted/adapted with permission

Although EISA appears as a versatile route to induce a nanostructuration into an inorganic material, allowing the modulation of size and shape of the nanostructures and not requiring sophisticated instrumental equipment [118], an important drawback of this technique is its high dependence on experimental parameters. Indeed, temperature,

from Ref. [74]).

**Figure 17.** SEM images of IrO2 mesoporous thin film template with PEOy-PBx-PEOy and calcinated

Similarly, Chandra et al. developed mesoporous IrO2 thin films choosing the triblock copolymer "Pluronic F127" (PEO106PPO70PEO106, chemical structure reported in Figure 18), as structural directing agent and spin-coating as deposition technique [74,117]. They reported that samples calcinated at 400 °C present 2D hexagonal mesostructure (*p*6*mm* symmetry, Figure 18), but an increase in treatment temperature entails the transformation into a disordered mesostructure. The enhancement of the electrocatalytic performance toward OER with respect to the untemplated IrO2 electrode was ca. 2 times higher for mesoporous structure and was ascribed to the larger accessible surface-to-volume ratio.

at 500 °C (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]).

templating agent [91,116]. These films presented nanocrystalline mesopores walls and some areas with locally ordered pores (Figure 17). Moreover, their electrocatalytic performance toward OER was tested and compared to untemplated IrO2 films obtained with the same experimental procedure. The current response on templated IrO2 films is about 2.1 times higher with respect to the untemplated IrO2 films, demonstrating the nanostruc-

turation advantages.

**Figure 18.** TEM images of mesoporous IrO2 films template with PEO106PPO70PEO106 recorded along the (**a**) [100] and (**b**) [110] axes of the 2D hexagonal structure (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [74]). **Figure 18.** TEM images of mesoporous IrO<sup>2</sup> films template with PEO106PPO70PEO<sup>106</sup> recorded along the (**a**) [100] and (**b**) [110] axes of the 2D hexagonal structure (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [74]).

Although EISA appears as a versatile route to induce a nanostructuration into an inorganic material, allowing the modulation of size and shape of the nanostructures and not requiring sophisticated instrumental equipment [118], an important drawback of this technique is its high dependence on experimental parameters. Indeed, temperature, Although EISA appears as a versatile route to induce a nanostructuration into an inorganic material, allowing the modulation of size and shape of the nanostructures and not requiring sophisticated instrumental equipment [118], an important drawback of this technique is its high dependence on experimental parameters. Indeed, temperature, humidity, extraction time and velocity (for dip-coating), concentration of the precursor solution and speed (for spin-coating) would be required as given experimental data for the sake of reproducibility and understanding of the mechanism of nanostructuration. A small amount of variation of these conditions may drastically affect the final nanostructures [119].

The hard-templating route has been also adapted to the preparation of IrO<sup>2</sup> nanostructured films. In this case, colloidal SiO<sup>2</sup> microspheres were immersed in an ethanolic solution of (H2IrCl6·*n*H2O) to allow the impregnation of the Iridium precursor within the template, then the suspension was dried and calcinated, and the template was removed by using a concentrated HF solution [98]. Chen et al. demonstrated that using SiO<sup>2</sup> microspheres with a mean diameter of 330 nm and very low polydispersity (ca. 0.5%), macroporous IrO2, displaying an ordered honeycomb array of macropore, can be obtained (Figure 19) [98]. The macropores are typically 300 nm in diameter, which is slightly smaller than the size of SiO<sup>2</sup> microspheres, probably as a consequence of the contraction of the template during the heat treatment process. Although nicely achieved, the main drawback of this synthetical method is the drastic and highly toxic acidic condition (concentrated HF solution) required to remove the templating SiO<sup>2</sup> agent.

Nanostructured IrO<sup>2</sup> films have also been prepared employing an ordered supramolecular gel phase generated by an organometallic Ir(III) complex, used both as templating agent and metal source. Indeed, several Ir(III) complexes can self-assemble in highly organized supramolecular phases in water, including physical gels and lyotropic liquid-crystalline gels [120–122]. Moreover, many metal oxide (SiO2, TiO2, ZrO2, ZnO and WO3) nanostructures, such as nanotubes, nanoparticles, and nanowires, have been efficiently prepared taking advantage of a supramolecular gel as structural directing agent (SDA) [123]. In this context, the supramolecular gel phase of the Ir(III) compound [(ppy)2Ir(bpy)]EtOCH2CO<sup>2</sup> (chemical structure reported in Figure 20), where ppy is 2-phenylpiridine and bpy is 2,20 bipyridine, which supramolecular architecture in water is built on a double 2D columnar system, was used as template and metal precursor for the preparation of IrO<sup>2</sup> films [122]. The highly ordered metallogel was deposited onto quartz substrates through spin-coating and was left to dry, obtaining the corresponding xerogel, that was calcinated at 600 ◦C for 4 h, obtaining a uniform IrO<sup>2</sup> thin film. As shown in Figure 19, the film prepared starting from the 5% *w*/*w* gel phase is composed of ordered vertical IrO<sup>2</sup> arrays that outline its nanostructure, whereas in the case of the 6% *w*/*w* gel phase, a self-assembled well-ordered multilayer thin film can be observed.

tures [119].

nolic solution of (H2IrCl6**.**

HF solution) required to remove the templating SiO2 agent.

humidity, extraction time and velocity (for dip-coating), concentration of the precursor solution and speed (for spin-coating) would be required as given experimental data for the sake of reproducibility and understanding of the mechanism of nanostructuration. A small amount of variation of these conditions may drastically affect the final nanostruc-

The hard-templating route has been also adapted to the preparation of IrO2 nanostructured films. In this case, colloidal SiO2 microspheres were immersed in an etha-

the template, then the suspension was dried and calcinated, and the template was removed by using a concentrated HF solution [98]. Chen et al. demonstrated that using SiO2 microspheres with a mean diameter of 330 nm and very low polydispersity (ca. 0.5%), macroporous IrO2, displaying an ordered honeycomb array of macropore, can be obtained (Figure 19) [98].The macropores are typically 300 nm in diameter, which is slightly smaller than the size of SiO2 microspheres, probably as a consequence of the contraction of the template during the heat treatment process. Although nicely achieved, the main drawback of this synthetical method is the drastic and highly toxic acidic condition (concentrated

*n*H2O) to allow the impregnation of the Iridium precursor within

**Figure 19.** (**a**) Low and (**b**) high magnification SEM images of macroporous IrO2 prepared by the **Figure 19.** hard-template method (Reprinted/adapted (**a**) Low and (**b**) high magnification SEM images of macroporous IrO with permission from Ref. [98]). <sup>2</sup> prepared by the hard-template method (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [98]). 19, the film prepared starting from the 5% *w*/*w* gel phase is composed of ordered vertical IrO2 arrays that outline its nanostructure, whereas in the case of the 6% *w*/*w* gel phase, a self-assembled well-ordered multilayer thin film can be observed.

**Figure 20.** Chemical structure of [(ppy)2Ir(bpy)]EtOCH2CO2 and SEM images of the IrO2 film prepared starting from its 5% *w*/*w* (**a**) and 6% *w*/*w* (**b**) gel phase (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [122]). **Figure 20.** Chemical structure of [(ppy)<sup>2</sup> Ir(bpy)]EtOCH2CO<sup>2</sup> and SEM images of the IrO<sup>2</sup> film prepared starting from its 5% *w*/*w* (**a**) and 6% *w*/*w* (**b**) gel phase (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [122]).

Although this study was at its early stage, it clearly shows the possibility of using self-ordered lyotropic Ir(III) complexes for the production of ordered nanostructured thin

Despite its intrinsic higher cost with respect to other semiconductive metal oxides,

acidic condition, which is a prerequisite for successful integration with photoanodes to reach optimal photoelectrochemical cells efficiency. As reviewed herein, IrO2 can be obtained in various types of nanostructured forms allowing the boosting of its performances

films of IrO2, opening a novel alternative route for their preparation.

**6. Conclusions** 

Although this study was at its early stage, it clearly shows the possibility of using self-ordered lyotropic Ir(III) complexes for the production of ordered nanostructured thin films of IrO2, opening a novel alternative route for their preparation.

#### **6. Conclusions**

Despite its intrinsic higher cost with respect to other semiconductive metal oxides, IrO<sup>2</sup> does present appealing characteristics that make it the ideal candidate for specific applications. IrO<sup>2</sup> is indeed the only active OER catalyst that is relatively stable in the acidic condition, which is a prerequisite for successful integration with photoanodes to reach optimal photoelectrochemical cells efficiency. As reviewed herein, IrO<sup>2</sup> can be obtained in various types of nanostructured forms allowing the boosting of its performances through mainly the increase of the active surface area owing to the nanoscale architecture. However, to reach such an increment in properties, severe experimental conditions are often required, specific templates or definite substrates must be employed, and a dedicated experimental set-up may also need to be designed. All these factors, of course, will further increase the effective cost of the active nanostructured metal-oxide. Efforts therefore must still be addressed in order to find more sustainable and environmentally friendly access to nanostructured IrO2-based materials.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, F.S. and N.G.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S.; reprint permission requests, I.A.; writ-ing—review and editing N.G., A.C. and I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was supported by the project PON "Ricerca e Innovazione" 2014–2020–STAR 2–PIR01\_00008 funded by MIUR (Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca). FS is grateful to the project PON "Ricerca e Innovazione" 2014–2020, Asse IV "Istruzione e ricerca per il recupero," and Azione IV.6 "Contratti di ricerca su tematiche Green".

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**

