*Article* **Changes in Slope Stability over the Growth and Decay of Japanese Cedar Tree Roots**

**Yasuhiko Okada 1,\*, Fei Cai <sup>2</sup> and Ushio Kurokawa <sup>3</sup>**


**Abstract:** In Japan, repeated driftwood landslide disasters have become a major issue; thus, studies are required to better understand forest function to implement appropriate forest management and prevent such disasters. We investigated the effect of Japanese cedar tree roots on shallow landslide initiation. To incorporate the effect of roots on the two side-flanks of the shallow landslide, we propose a new slope-stability analysis method in which the sliding block is simplified as a three-prism model. The root reinforcement was approximated by the sum of the root pullout forces over a unit area, incorporating changes in the root strength with the growth of the trees after planting and the decay of the stumps after cutting. The reinforced root strength after the stump-cutting decreased linearly with time, with no strength remaining at 9 years. In contrast, the reinforced root strength of the new plants increased according to a logistic curve with time; thus, the root strength increased only slightly up to 9 years after planting, and the minimum total reinforced root strength was observed at this time. The safety factor of the slopes in a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture was calculated using the proposed three-prism method at intervals of 5 years on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model. The number of unstable grids peaked at 10 years, and a higher risk of slope instability was observed at 5–15 years. Therefore, implementing forest operations for lowering slope instability during this period should be important to prevent landslide disasters.

**Keywords:** reinforcement of roots; slope stability; growth and decay; Japanese cedar trees; shallow landslides

### **1. Introduction**

In Japan, driftwood landslide disasters are a major concern, owing to the regional development of residences in mountainous areas and an increase in the number of severe rainfall events, probably influenced by climate change [1]. In the last quarter century, debris flows mobilised from shallow landslides or complex earth slides–earth flows [2] have hit some residential areas, extending to alluvial fans in many places [3–5]. Notably, in Hiroshima Prefecture, debris flows have severely damaged areas within a short period, causing 31 and 74 deaths in 1999 and 2014, respectively [6–9].

In July 2018, a large amount of driftwood was observed in landslides induced by heavy rainfall events over the western part of the main island and Shikoku Island [10]. The relationship between forests and landslide disasters has received substantial attention from researchers, engineers, and administrative officers. In particular, the differences in landslide susceptibility between natural and artificial forests and between coniferous and broadleaf forests have been examined [11,12]. After an extended period of afforestation from around the 1950s to the 1970s, the trees have grown large and are ready for harvest [13]; therefore, the strategies for controlling and managing forests must be carefully considered. Trees are

**Citation:** Okada, Y.; Cai, F.; Kurokawa, U. Changes in Slope Stability over the Growth and Decay of Japanese Cedar Tree Roots. *Forests* **2023**, *14*, 256. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/f14020256

Academic Editors: Haijia Wen, Weile Li, Chong Xu and Hiromu Daimaru

Received: 14 December 2022 Revised: 21 January 2023 Accepted: 22 January 2023 Published: 29 January 2023

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

hazardous once they are engulfed and become driftwood, but they reinforce slopes through networking root systems within the subsoil that prevent shallow landslides. In some cases, trees can capture flows of driftwood and debris to decrease downslope damage [14,15]. Regarding the multifunctional role of forests, the public has been aware of their disaster prevention function against landslides and erosion for 40 years and now understands that they help prevent climate change by absorbing greenhouse gases [16]. As of 31 March 2021, the Forestry Agency of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries has designated areas in the national forest as forest reserves (1.3 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> km<sup>2</sup> ) [17]; these forest areas are expected to prevent soil run-off (2.6 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup> ) and landslides (6.0 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>2</sup> km<sup>2</sup> ), thereby acting as countermeasures against forest disasters.

The ability of tree roots to prevent shallow landslides has been investigated intensively. For example, the mechanical behaviour of roots crossing a sliding surface during shearing has been closely examined, and reinforced root strength is known to act as the root cohesion component (*cr*) in the Mohr–Coulomb failure equation [18–22]. In addition, root pullout experiments have revealed that the summation of root pullout strength over a unit area acts as *c<sup>r</sup>* [23,24]. Accordingly, the root bundle model was proposed, in which the root length, maximum tensile force, and average Young's modulus were approximated using a function of the root diameter [25]. The effects of the root distribution, root angles across the sliding surface, and root diameter have also been examined in triaxial compression tests [26]. Large-scale, in situ direct shear experiments have been conducted, in which specimens (about 1 m in both width and length) holding a tree stump were excavated for direct shearing [27–29], with one such experiment conducted on a steep slope of 32◦ [30].

Analyses of slope stability have been conducted considering *c<sup>r</sup>* [31–33]. In this regard, the two-dimensional (2-D) infinite slope model is commonly employed, given its simplicity, i.e., the reinforced strength of roots is given only over the bottom surface of an oblique quadrangular prism; therefore, only the vertical roots penetrating to the bottom of a sliding surface contribute to reinforcing the slope stability. Considering the importance of lateral roots, slope models that enable the evaluation of their effects have been developed. The effects of lateral roots have been considered in the 2-D infinite slope model [34]; however, only one vertical surface of the oblique quadrangular prism at the upslope side in the longitudinal direction was considered, and the effects of lateral roots on the vertical surface at the downslope side and two side-flanks of the prism were not examined. Regarding the transverse direction, Ueno [35] investigated the effect of widths on landslide initiation using an infinite slope model in the longitudinal direction but with a transverse trapezium section; however, the transverse slope of the side-flanks of the trapezium section was assumed to be constant and equal to 45◦ , and *c<sup>r</sup>* was not considered.

To evaluate the effects of lateral roots across the side-flanks, a three-dimensional (3-D) slope model should be used. Indeed, 3-D slope stability has commonly been analysed to calculate the safety factors related to relatively large, deep-seated landslides for which the whole sliding surface of the landslide mass could be approximated before the final failure [36–39]. General and rigorous limit equilibrium methods have been proposed for performing a 3-D slope-stability analysis [40,41], and recent advances in such analyses were reviewed by Kumar [42]. However, for most shallow landslides, the length is much greater than the transverse width, and the side-flanks of the sliding surface cannot be determined before the failure initiation, making it difficult to apply a 3-D analysis method to shallow landslides. Thus, changes in the slope stability associated with shallow landslides in forest basins have been investigated using digital elevation models with the 2-D infinite slope model [21,43–45]. In such studies, the main focus was the changes in triggering conditions, such as rainfall infiltration, determined through saturated and unsaturated seepage flow analysis, which is investigated because rainfall-induced shallow landslides are frequent disasters.

The focus of the present study was the stability changes in forest slopes over the years as an important factor in the induction of shallow landslides. The forest growth over time improves the ability of a forest to prevent shallow landslides, but a forest loses this ability

after a certain level of cutting is conducted. Accordingly, the yearly changes in the ability of a forest to prevent shallow landslides are complex. Because yearly changes affect the induction of shallow landslides, a slope stability evaluation should include the growth and decay of the trees. Japanese cedars are the most planted trees in Japan, occupying about 18% of all Japanese forests, as of 31 March 2018 [46]; hence, Japanese cedars were examined in the present study. We propose a method for assessing slope stability using three prisms to analyse the effects of the lateral roots. The proposed method was applied to a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture, northeast of Tokyo, Japan, for which the topography was represented by a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model. The change in the slope stability of the forest basin was evaluated over a 50-year period after the stump cutting and immediate planting of Japanese cedar trees.

### **2. Materials and Methods**

### *2.1. Root Pullout Experiments*

A series of pullout experiments was conducted to investigate the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar roots, i.e., the root cohesion component (*cr*) in the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. Half-sphere-shaped trenches with a diameter of 0.3–0.5 m centred in the test tree trunk were excavated below the trunks. A pullout experiment was conducted on each root exposed on the trench surface following diameter measurements. In the pullout experiment, the roots were pinched with a pliers-like tool and pulled manually to measure the maximum pullout force, using a force gauge (Digital Force Gauge, ZTS-1000N, IMADA Limited, Aichi, Japan) connected to the pliers-like tool. The diameter of the pulled-out roots was 2–40 mm. Although broken and unbroken roots were observed during the experiment, we did not distinguish the measured maximum forces of the broken roots from those without ruptures. We selected uncut tree trunks to investigate live roots, and those cut 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 years ago to examine changes following decay. At least two trunks were examined for each condition.

### *2.2. Roots on the Sliding Surface*

To calculate *c<sup>r</sup>* , the number and diameter of roots on a potential sliding surface must be obtained. Although tree root distributions are generally not simple, we used the root distribution model for Japanese cedar trees proposed by Abe [22], who excavated a layer of soil below the test trees to a depth of 10 cm and measured the number and diameter of all the exposed roots; this excavation process was repeated at 10 cm intervals until no roots were found. Abe surveyed four locations in Japan, one of which was in Ibaraki Prefecture [22], where the changes in the slope stability in a forest basin were investigated in the present study.

Abe [22] proposed a root volume depth-wise distribution of 10 cm, as follows:

$$V(z) = V\_r \int\_{z\_c - 10}^{z\_c} f(z) dz,\tag{1}$$

$$f(z) = \frac{mz^{m-1}}{\mathfrak{a}\_0} \times \text{EXP} \left[\frac{-z^m}{\mathfrak{a}\_0}\right],\tag{2}$$

$$m = \frac{2.0}{\log Z\_{\text{max}} - \log(0.3522 \times Z\_{\text{max}} - 10.7990)}\tag{3}$$

$$\alpha\_0 = \left(0.3522 \times Z\_{\text{max}} - 10.7990\right)^m,\tag{4}$$

where *V*(*z*) is the root volume in a 10-centimetre-thick layer (cm<sup>3</sup> ), *V<sup>r</sup>* is the total root volume (cm<sup>3</sup> ), *z* is the depth (cm), *Z*max is the maximum root depth (cm), and *z<sup>c</sup>* is the depth parameter varying by 10 cm (*z<sup>c</sup>* = 10, 20, . . . , *zc*max, e.g., in Equation (1), at *z<sup>c</sup>* = 10, the root volume in the soil layer 0–10 cm deep would be calculated, whereas that at *z<sup>c</sup>* = 20 would be calculated in the soil layer 10–20 cm deep, and so on; *zc*max is the upper limit of a 10-centimetre-deep class containing *Z*max, e.g., at *Z*max = 97 cm; *zc*max would be 100 cm); *f*(*z*) is a Weibull probability density function; and *m* and *α*<sup>0</sup> are the Weibull parameters. The total root volume, *V<sup>r</sup>* , was calculated using an equation for the total weight [47]:

$$\begin{aligned} \log W\_r &= -0.3085 + 0.8216 \times \log \left( DBH^2 \times H \right), \\ V\_{r=W\_r/G\_{S\_{r'}}} \end{aligned} \tag{5}$$

where *H* is the height of the tree (cm), *DBH* is the diameter at breast height (cm), *W<sup>r</sup>* is the total weight of the roots (gf), and *G<sup>s</sup>* is the unit weight of the roots, set at 0.973 gf/cm<sup>3</sup> in the present study [48].

The soil was divided into three zones: shallow, middle, and deep. The roots were then classified into 0.5-centimetre-wide classes, and the relative frequencies were calculated for the shallow, middle, and deep zones before they were expressed using the diameter class:

$$\begin{array}{l} Y\_l(D\_i) = 6.43 \times D\_i^{-1.53} \\ Y\_m(D\_i) = 4.73 \times D\_i^{-1.86} \\ Y\_b(D\_i) = 6.04 \times D\_i^{-1.81} \end{array} \tag{6}$$

where *D<sup>i</sup>* is the class mark for the 0.5-centimetre-wide diameter of roots (*D<sup>i</sup>* = 0.25, 0.75, 1.25 cm, and so on), and *Yt*(*D<sup>i</sup>* ), *Ym*(*D<sup>i</sup>* ), and *Y<sup>b</sup>* (*D<sup>i</sup>* ) are the relative frequencies in the topsoil, middle, and bottom zones, respectively. In addition, the average volume of a root in each class [*Va*(*D<sup>i</sup>* )] was measured and expressed using the diameter class:

$$V\_a(D\_i) = 7.81 \times D\_i^{2.14} \tag{7}$$

Based on these equations, we calculated the number of roots in each diameter class (0.5-centimetre-wide) on a potential sliding surface in a certain 10-centimetre-thick soil layer after incorporating *DBH*, *H*, and *Zmax* as the input parameters. The reinforced strength of the roots was estimated by summing the pullout strengths over a unit area, according to the calculated number of roots in each diameter class on a potential sliding surface [23,24,49], a method that has been widely used in other studies [32,50–53]. We calculated the reinforced strength of the roots in a soil layer at depths of >30 cm (i.e., 30–40 cm, 40–50 cm, etc.), which were labelled as 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95 cm deep.

### *2.3. Slope-Stability Analysis*

The reinforced strength of the roots (i.e., *cr*) should be considered when evaluating slope stability. The 2-D infinite slope model is usually employed, where the reinforced strength of the roots is assigned on the bottom surface. However, a 2-D infinite slope model does not consider the reinforcement of the roots on the two transverse sides of the sliding block, which ought to increase the safety factor of shallow landslide blocks, to some extent, especially for sliding blocks with smaller widths. Thus, a 3-D slope model should be used to consider the reinforcement effect of the roots across the flanks on the safety factor of the sliding blocks. Because the length of shallow landslides is usually much larger than the transverse width, we assumed an infinite slope in the longitudinal direction to maintain the simplicity of our slope-stability analysis. Thus, we propose a three-prism model consisting of an oblique quadrangular prism sandwiched between two oblique triangular prisms (Figure 1) to evaluate the reinforcement effect of the roots on the flanks of shallow landslides. In this model, a constant reinforced root strength is assigned to the bottom surfaces of the central prism and the two side triangular prisms. The variable transverse slope, *β*, is determined as the safety factor of the three-prism model, which takes its lowest value under unsaturated conditions without a water table in the soil. The results of the three-prism method were compared with those of Hovland's method [36] and simplified Janbu's method [37] because these have generally been employed in Japan for 3-D examinations. In this fundamental analysis of the grid calculation on a 1-metreresolution digital elevation model, the soil depth, *D*, and longitudinal slope, *α*, were kept constant at 0.7 m and 34.5◦ , respectively. The wet soil unit weight was 11.12 kN/m<sup>3</sup> , the

saturated soil unit weight was 15.09 kN/m<sup>3</sup> , the angle of internal friction was 34.5◦ , and the soil cohesion was 0 kPa. These parameter values were determined according to the results of soil tests performed on soil samples taken from a scarp, underlain by biotite gneiss, in a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture. These soil parameters were later incorporated in the grid calculations on a digital elevation model obtained via airborne laser surveys, in which four laser points per m<sup>2</sup> were measured. Both the *c<sup>r</sup>* and the total width of the three-prism model at the ground surface were changed to investigate their influence on the slope stability. α, were kept constant at 0.7 m and 34.5°, respectively. The wet soil unit weight was 11.12 kN/m3, the saturated soil unit weight was 15.09 kN/m3, the angle of internal friction was 34.5°, and the soil cohesion was 0 kPa. These parameter values were determined according to the results of soil tests performed on soil samples taken from a scarp, underlain by biotite gneiss, in a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture. These soil parameters were later incorporated in the grid calculations on a digital elevation model obtained via airborne laser surveys, in which four laser points per m2 were measured. Both the *cr* and the total width of the three-prism model at the ground surface were changed to investigate their influence

which takes its lowest value under unsaturated conditions without a water table in the soil. The results of the three-prism method were compared with those of Hovland's method [36] and simplified Janbu's method [37] because these have generally been employed in Japan for 3-D examinations. In this fundamental analysis of the grid calculation on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model, the soil depth, *D*, and longitudinal slope,

*Forests* **2022**, *13*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 18

β

variable transverse slope,

on the slope stability.

method (*F*j):

**Figure 1.** Schematic of the three-prism model used for slope-stability analysis. (**a**) Three prisms. (**b**) Reinforcement by roots on a potential sliding surface. **Figure 1.** Schematic of the three-prism model used for slope-stability analysis. (**a**) Three prisms. (**b**) Reinforcement by roots on a potential sliding surface.

For the three-prism model shown in Figure 1, the safety factor can be expressed by Equation (8) for Hovland's method (*F*h) and Equation (9) for the 3-D simplified Janbu's For the three-prism model shown in Figure 1, the safety factor can be expressed by Equation (8) for Hovland's method (*F*h) and Equation (9) for the 3-D simplified Janbu's method (*F*<sup>j</sup> ):

$$F\_{\mathbf{h}} = \frac{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} \left[ (W\_i - \mathcal{U}\_i) / f\_i \cdot \tan \phi' + c\_r \cdot A\_i \right]}{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} W\_i \cdot \sin \alpha} \,\tag{8}$$

, is determined as the safety factor of the three-prism model,

$$F\_{\mathbf{l}} = \frac{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} \left[ \left( W\_i - \mathbf{U}\_i \cdot \cos^2 a \right) \cdot \tan \phi' + c\_l \cdot A\_i / J\_i \right] / (\cos a \cdot m\_{\alpha i})}{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} W\_i \cdot \tan a},\tag{9}$$

$$\begin{aligned} W\_{\text{i}} &= 0.5 \cdot H^{2} \cdot \tan \theta \cdot L \cdot \cos \mathfrak{a} \cdot \gamma\_{\text{sat}} + 0.5 \cdot (D^{2} - H^{2}) \cdot \tan \theta \cdot L \cdot \cos \mathfrak{a} \cdot \gamma\_{\text{t}} + q\_{\text{i}} \text{ (i = 1, 3)},\\ W\_{\text{2}} &= B \cdot H \cdot L \cdot \cos \mathfrak{a} \cdot \gamma\_{\text{sat}} + B \cdot (D - H) \cdot L \cdot \cos \mathfrak{a} \cdot \gamma\_{\text{t}} + q\_{\text{2}} \end{aligned} \tag{10}$$

$$\text{U}l\_i = 0.5 \cdot H^2 \cdot \tan \theta \cdot L \cdot \cos \alpha \cdot \gamma\_W \ (i = 1, \ 3); \ \text{U}l\_2 = B \cdot H \cdot L \cdot \cos \alpha \cdot \gamma\_W \tag{11}$$

$$A\_i = D \cdot L \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 \alpha + 1/\tan^2 \beta} \text{ ( $i = 1, 3$ ); } A\_2 = B \cdot L,\tag{12}$$

$$J\_i = \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \alpha + \tan^2 \beta} \text{ (\$i = 1, 3); } J\_2 = 1/\cos \alpha,\tag{13}$$

$$\left| m\_{\alpha i} = 1/I\_{\text{I}} + \sin \alpha \cdot \tan \phi^{'}/F\_{\text{I}} \left( i = 1, \ 2, \ 3 \right), \tag{14} \right. \tag{14}$$

 = ඥ1 + tanଶ + tanଶ ( = 1, 3); ଶ = 1/cos, (13) = 1/ + sintan ᇱ /୨ ( = 1, 2, 3), (14) where *W*1, *W*3, and *W*2 are the soil weights of the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and the central oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *U*1, *U*3, and *U*2 are the total water pressures on the bottom of the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *q*1, *q*3, and *q*2 are the tree surcharges on the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *A*1, *A*3, and *A*2 are the bottom areas of the two oblique triangular quadrangular where *W*1, *W*3, and *W*<sup>2</sup> are the soil weights of the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and the central oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *U*1, *U*3, and *U*<sup>2</sup> are the total water pressures on the bottom of the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *q*1, *q*3, and *q*<sup>2</sup> are the tree surcharges on the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and oblique quadrangular prism, respectively; *A*1, *A*3, and *A*<sup>2</sup> are the bottom areas of the two oblique triangular quadrangular prisms and oblique quadrangular prism, respectively, on which a constant reinforced root strength is mobilised; *φ'* is the effective angle of internal friction; *c<sup>r</sup>* is the root cohesion component; *γ*t is the unit weight of wet soil (11.12 kN/m<sup>3</sup> ); *γ*sat is the unit weight of saturated soil (15.09 kN/m<sup>3</sup> ); and *γ*<sup>w</sup> is the unit weight of water (9.81 kN/m<sup>3</sup> ). As shown in Figure 1, *α* and *β* are the longitudinal and transverse slopes, respectively, *θ* is the complementary angle of *β* (= 90◦ − *β*), and *E*, *B*, *H*, *L*, and *D* define the sizes of the sliding block.

However, both Hovland's method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's method have some weaknesses when applied to the three-prism model, as described in Section 3.3. To resolve these issues, we proposed a slope-stability analysis method applying the three-prism model as follows: the self-weight component was calculated using the self-weight of the oblique triangular prisms to act as the oblique quadrangular prism with the same volume; hence, the self-weight component was obtained through the one assumed oblique quadrangular prism. Meanwhile, the reinforced root strength acted on the flank-surfaces of the oblique triangular prisms. The safety factor of this proposed three-prism method is given by Equation (15):

$$F\_{\rm 3p} = \frac{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} \left[ (\mathcal{W}\_{i} - \mathcal{U}\_{i}) \cdot \cos \boldsymbol{\alpha} \cdot \tan \boldsymbol{\phi}^{\prime} + c\_{r} \cdot A\_{i} \right]}{\sum\_{i=1}^{3} \mathcal{W}\_{i} \cdot \sin \boldsymbol{\alpha}}. \tag{15}$$

Using the forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture as a case study, the slope stability was examined using the three-prism method (described in detail in Section 3.3), assuming that the whole basin was covered with 50-year-old Japanese cedar trees. The changes in slope stability on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model (Figure 2) were analysed, as 50-year-old trees were clear-cut and new seedlings were immediately planted. The assumed changes in the number, height, and diameter at breast height of Japanese cedar trees over 50 years (the second rank of the site index) were determined using the yield tables of Japanese cedar trees, developed for regions in and around Ibaraki Prefecture [54]. To perform the slope-stability analysis, the soil depth at each grid in the target area must be obtained. Ideally, several simplified cone penetration tests should be conducted to obtain the soil depth at *N*<sup>c</sup> = 10 (*N<sup>c</sup>* indicates the number of attempts required for a 5 kg weight dropped from a height of 0.50 m to drive the cone 0.10 m into the soil; it is generally assumed that slopes are subject to failure under certain triggering conditions involving *N*<sup>c</sup> values of <10) [55]. However, conducting such tests in large areas is difficult, owing to time and cost limitations. In the last decade, some soil depth estimations have been generated using machine learning [56–59]; however, soil depth data will likely be acquired using this method in the near future. In the present study, we instead used a soil depth estimation method in which the slope and transverse angle on each grid were incorporated in the following equations [60]:

$$D = 0.9581 \times EXP[-0.0036 \times D\_{\rm br}] \times D\_{\rm br\prime} \tag{16}$$

$$D\_{\rm br} = -8.30 \times \alpha - 1.29 \times \delta + 681,\tag{17}$$

where *D* is the soil depth (cm), *D*br is the depth above the bedrock surface of *N*<sup>c</sup> = 40 (cm), *α* is the slope (degrees), and *δ* is the transverse angle (degrees). The transverse angle was obtained following the survey guide for investigations on forest disasters [61], as follows:

A circle (with C set at the centre point) was inscribed in a square grid on a contour map.

Two intersection points of the contour line passing through point C and the inscribed circle (S<sup>1</sup> and S2) were obtained.

The transverse angle, S1CS2, was measured on the downslope side (for the upslope direction, the angle is smaller on a valley topography and larger on a ridge).

Notably, some grids had soil depths of <30 cm in the area. For these grids, the reinforced strength of roots (the root cohesion component) calculated on a potential sliding surface at 35 cm was instead applied. For each grid with a slope and soil depth, the threeprism slope model was applied to evaluate the slope stability by calculating the safety factor. The stability analysis was conducted under fully saturated conditions with two different tree weight conditions, i.e., with and without the aboveground weight of trees.

**Figure 2.** Topography maps of the studied forest basin. (**a**) Location of Ibaraki Prefecture. (**b**) Elevation, (**c**) slope (calculated by TNTmips (Version 2019, Redmond, DC, USA)), and (**d**) soil depth. **Figure 2.** Topography maps of the studied forest basin. (**a**) Location of Ibaraki Prefecture. (**b**) Elevation, (**c**) slope (calculated by TNTmips (Version 2019, Redmond, DC, USA)), and (**d**) soil depth.

#### Notably, some grids had soil depths of <30 cm in the area. For these grids, the rein-**3. Results**

#### forced strength of roots (the root cohesion component) calculated on a potential sliding *3.1. Pullout Strength of Roots*

surface at 35 cm was instead applied. For each grid with a slope and soil depth, the threeprism slope model was applied to evaluate the slope stability by calculating the safety factor. The stability analysis was conducted under fully saturated conditions with two different tree weight conditions, i.e., with and without the aboveground weight of trees. **3. Results** *3.1. Pullout Strength of Roots* The obtained maximum pullout strength of the roots is shown in Figure 3 in relation to the diameter at a point where the root was pinched with the pliers-like tool. The maximum pullout strength of the live roots of uncut trunks exhibited the exponent function of The obtained maximum pullout strength of the roots is shown in Figure 3 in relation to the diameter at a point where the root was pinched with the pliers-like tool. The maximum pullout strength of the live roots of uncut trunks exhibited the exponent function of the diameter, as reported in a previous study [24]. Notably, the maximum pullout strength of the roots of cut trunks had similar characteristics, exhibiting the exponent function of the diameter, regardless of the time after cutting. The roots of trunks cut 8 years previously were vulnerable to breakage; thus, we could not conduct pullout experiments on roots with diameters of about <20 mm because they broke when pinched. Given the same diameter, the maximum pullout strength was the highest for the living roots of uncut trunks and decreased as more time elapsed after the trunks were cut.

#### the diameter, as reported in a previous study [24]. Notably, the maximum pullout strength *3.2. Root Strength on the Sliding Surface at Different Depths*

of the roots of cut trunks had similar characteristics, exhibiting the exponent function of the diameter, regardless of the time after cutting. The roots of trunks cut 8 years previously were vulnerable to breakage; thus, we could not conduct pullout experiments on roots with diameters of about <20 mm because they broke when pinched. Given the same diameter, the maximum pullout strength was the highest for the living roots of uncut trunks In shallow landslides, a sliding surface forms within a soil layer above the bedrock. The number of tree roots in each diameter class across the sliding surface at different soil depths was calculated using the root distribution model [22] and is summarized for Japanese cedar stands at different ages (10–50 years) in Table A1 in Appendix A.

and decreased as more time elapsed after the trunks were cut. The reinforced strengths of tree roots, calculated as the summation of the maximum pullout forces of the roots across a unit area sliding surface, are shown in relation to the elapsed time after new planting in Figure 4a. At each depth of the sliding surface, the reinforced strength had increased markedly by about 25 years after planting, after which it remained relatively constant. Although some scatter was observed, the reinforced strength of the tree roots was approximated using a logistic function of the elapsed time after planting. Along the curve, the reinforced strength of the roots gradually increased up to about 5 years, followed by a rapid increase, with the maximum acceleration of strength

different times (labelled on the graph).

to remain at around 9 years.

(**a**)

(**a**)

*Forests* **2023**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 18

at about 7 years. However, from around 13 years, the rate of reinforcement appeared to decelerate. *Forests* **2022**, *13*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 18 *3.2. Root Strength on the Sliding Surface at Different Depths*  In shallow landslides, a sliding surface forms within a soil layer above the bedrock. The number of tree roots in each diameter class across the sliding surface at different soil

**Figure 3.** Maximum pullout strengths of the Japanese cedar roots of live trees and stumps cut at

**Figure 3.** Maximum pullout strengths of the Japanese cedar roots of live trees and stumps cut at different times (labelled on the graph). **Figure 3.** Maximum pullout strengths of the Japanese cedar roots of live trees and stumps cut at different times (labelled on the graph). shown according to the elapsed time after cutting in Figure 4b. The reinforced strength of the roots linearly decreased with the elapsed time after cutting, and no strength appeared

**Figure 4.** Changes in the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar roots over time. (**a**) Increased strength caused by roots growing after new planning. (**b**) Decreased strength caused by roots decaying after stump-cutting. **Figure 4.** Changes in the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar roots over time. (**a**) Increased strength caused by roots growing after new planning. (**b**) Decreased strength caused by roots decaying after stump-cutting.

The changes in the risk of shallow landslides were examined using the proposed three-prism model for slope-stability analysis. Figure 5 shows the relationship between

method [36]. Both the *β* and *Fh* decreased when the *cr* was of <0.8 kPa, with smaller prism widths. This was likely because, in Hovland's method, the inter-prism force is approximated to zero, and the total balance of the force and the moment of force are not satisfied. In this regard, previous studies have revealed that smaller safety factors are obtained us-

ing Hovland's method for 3-D analyses of sandy soils [62–64].

*3.3. Changes in Slope Stability in the Three-Prism Model* 

After clear-cutting, the roots of trees begin to decay, reducing the reinforced strength. Given that the trees were cut at the age of 50 years, the decreased reinforced strength is shown according to the elapsed time after cutting in Figure 4b. The reinforced strength of the roots linearly decreased with the elapsed time after cutting, and no strength appeared to remain at around 9 years. **Figure 4.** Changes in the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar roots over time. (**a**) Increased strength caused by roots growing after new planning. (**b**) Decreased strength caused by roots decaying after stump-cutting.

#### *3.3. Changes in Slope Stability in the Three-Prism Model 3.3. Changes in Slope Stability in the Three-Prism Model*

*Forests* **2023**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 18

(**b**)

(**a**)

(**b**)

The changes in the risk of shallow landslides were examined using the proposed three-prism model for slope-stability analysis. Figure 5 shows the relationship between the transverse slope, *β*, of the side-oblique triangular prisms and the prism width, and that between the safety factor, *F<sup>h</sup>* , and the prism width, both determined using Hovland's method [36]. Both the *β* and *F<sup>h</sup>* decreased when the *c<sup>r</sup>* was of <0.8 kPa, with smaller prism widths. This was likely because, in Hovland's method, the inter-prism force is approximated to zero, and the total balance of the force and the moment of force are not satisfied. In this regard, previous studies have revealed that smaller safety factors are obtained using Hovland's method for 3-D analyses of sandy soils [62–64]. The changes in the risk of shallow landslides were examined using the proposed three-prism model for slope-stability analysis. Figure 5 shows the relationship between the transverse slope, *β*, of the side-oblique triangular prisms and the prism width, and that between the safety factor, *Fh*, and the prism width, both determined using Hovland's method [36]. Both the *β* and *Fh* decreased when the *cr* was of <0.8 kPa, with smaller prism widths. This was likely because, in Hovland's method, the inter-prism force is approximated to zero, and the total balance of the force and the moment of force are not satisfied. In this regard, previous studies have revealed that smaller safety factors are obtained using Hovland's method for 3-D analyses of sandy soils [62–64].

**Figure 5.** Results of slope-stability analysis obtained using Hovland's method. Changes in (**a**) the transverse slope (β) and (**b**) safety factor, according to prism width. **Figure 5.** Results of slope-stability analysis obtained using Hovland's method. Changes in (**a**) the transverse slope (*β*) and (**b**) safety factor, according to prism width.

The safety factor determined using the proposed three-prism method (*F3p*) was compared with those determined using Hovland's method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's The safety factor determined using the proposed three-prism method (*F3p*) was compared with those determined using Hovland's method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's

method (Figure 6). Notably, the 3-D simplified Janbu's method [37–39] obtained the smallest safety factor when the side-oblique triangular prisms disappeared (i.e., when the trans-

vertical sides in the 3-D slope-stability analysis [65]. Thus, in the calculation for the 3-D simplified Janbu's method, we also used the values of the transverse slope obtained using

**Figure 6.** Comparison of safety factors according to prism width evaluated using different analysis

The safety factors obtained using Hovland's method were generally lower than those obtained using the proposed three-prism method or the 3-D simplified Janbu's method when the prism widths were about <10 m. However, the safety factors of the proposed method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's method were generally consistent over the range of prism widths. Notably, the safety factors of the three methods converged when the prism width was about >15 m. For reference, the results of the simplest 2-D infinite slope

the proposed three-prism method.

methods.

method (Figure 6). Notably, the 3-D simplified Janbu's method [37–39] obtained the smallest safety factor when the side-oblique triangular prisms disappeared (i.e., when the transverse angle *β* was 90◦ ), because the method does not consider the shear strength on the vertical sides in the 3-D slope-stability analysis [65]. Thus, in the calculation for the 3-D simplified Janbu's method, we also used the values of the transverse slope obtained using the proposed three-prism method. pared with those determined using Hovland's method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's method (Figure 6). Notably, the 3-D simplified Janbu's method [37–39] obtained the smallest safety factor when the side-oblique triangular prisms disappeared (i.e., when the transverse angle *β* was 90°), because the method does not consider the shear strength on the vertical sides in the 3-D slope-stability analysis [65]. Thus, in the calculation for the 3-D simplified Janbu's method, we also used the values of the transverse slope obtained using the proposed three-prism method.

**Figure 5.** Results of slope-stability analysis obtained using Hovland's method. Changes in (**a**) the

The safety factor determined using the proposed three-prism method (*F3p*) was com-

) and (**b**) safety factor, according to prism width.

*Forests* **2022**, *13*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 18

(b)

transverse slope (

β

**Figure 6.** Comparison of safety factors according to prism width evaluated using different analysis **Figure 6.** Comparison of safety factors according to prism width evaluated using different analysis methods.

methods. The safety factors obtained using Hovland's method were generally lower than those obtained using the proposed three-prism method or the 3-D simplified Janbu's method when the prism widths were about <10 m. However, the safety factors of the proposed method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's method were generally consistent over the range of prism widths. Notably, the safety factors of the three methods converged when the prism width was about >15 m. For reference, the results of the simplest 2-D infinite slope The safety factors obtained using Hovland's method were generally lower than those obtained using the proposed three-prism method or the 3-D simplified Janbu's method when the prism widths were about <10 m. However, the safety factors of the proposed method and the 3-D simplified Janbu's method were generally consistent over the range of prism widths. Notably, the safety factors of the three methods converged when the prism width was about >15 m. For reference, the results of the simplest 2-D infinite slope model method are also shown in Figure 6. In this method, the prism width did not affect the safety factor (expediently plotted at a prism width of 20 m). At a block width of 20 m, a small difference was observed in the safety factors between the proposed three-prism method and the 2-D infinite slope model method, in which the difference was up to about 0.07 when the reinforced root strength was 5 kPa.

The widths of most shallow landslides are about 10–15 m according to Kosugi [66] and 5–20 m according to Okimura [67]. According to these findings and avoiding the overestimation of tree root effects, the shallow landslide risk was demonstratively evaluated on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model over the forest basin using the newly proposed three-prism method with a block width of 20 m. For each grid, the longitudinal slope, *α*, and soil depth, *D*, were the inputs, whereas *β* was estimated. For this estimation, the value of *β* with a minimum 3-D safety factor was calculated for various values of *α* (15.0◦ , 25.0◦ , 30.0◦ , 34.5◦ , 35.0◦ , 40.0◦ , and 45.0◦ ) and *D* (0.3–1.3 m at intervals of 0.1 m). A multiple regression analysis indicated that *β* can be estimated using the following regression equation, where *α* and *D* are the two independent variables:

$$\beta = 3.538 \times 10^{-3} \text{a}^2 - 3.757 \times 10^{-2} \text{a}D + 1.930 \times 10^{-2} \text{a} + 3.397 \times D + 59.70. \tag{18}$$

Because the interpretation of 3-D illustrations can be difficult, changes in *β* versus *α* with a constant *D* and *β* versus *D* with a constant α are shown in Figure 7, in which the curves are plotted using the regression Equation (18).

slope,

(**a**)

(**b**)

depth (*D*).

**4. Discussion** 

α

sion equation, where

model method are also shown in Figure 6. In this method, the prism width did not affect the safety factor (expediently plotted at a prism width of 20 m). At a block width of 20 m, a small difference was observed in the safety factors between the proposed three-prism method and the 2-D infinite slope model method, in which the difference was up to about

The widths of most shallow landslides are about 10–15 m according to Kosugi [66]

, and soil depth, *D*, were the inputs, whereas *β* was estimated. For this estimation,

α

α

and 5–20 m according to Okimura [67]. According to these findings and avoiding the overestimation of tree root effects, the shallow landslide risk was demonstratively evaluated on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model over the forest basin using the newly proposed three-prism method with a block width of 20 m. For each grid, the longitudinal

the value of *β* with a minimum 3-D safety factor was calculated for various values of

(15.0°, 25.0°, 30.0°, 34.5°, 35.0°, 40.0°, and 45.0°) and *D* (0.3–1.3 m at intervals of 0.1 m). A multiple regression analysis indicated that *β* can be estimated using the following regres-

and *D* are the two independent variables:

= 3.538 × 10ିଷଶ − 3.757 × 10ିଶ + 1.930 × 10ିଶ + 3.397 × +

Because the interpretation of 3-D illustrations can be difficult, changes in *β* versus

59.70. (18)

0.07 when the reinforced root strength was 5 kPa.

α

curves are plotted using the regression Equation (18).

**Figure 7.** Changes in the transverse slope (β) according to (**a**) the longitudinal slope (α) and (**b**) soil **Figure 7.** Changes in the transverse slope (*β*) according to (**a**) the longitudinal slope (*α*) and (**b**) soil depth (*D*).

### **4. Discussion**

The reinforced root strength is expected to increase and decrease after new planting and stump cutting, respectively. Given that whole stands of Japanese cedar trees are harvested at the age of 50 years, and that seedlings are newly planted at the same time, the total reinforced root strength should be the sum of that of the decaying roots of the old stumps and the growing roots of the new stumps. Figure 8 shows the change in the total reinforced root strength at different depths according to the elapsed time up to 50 years. In the early stage, the decrease in the reinforced strength of decaying roots plays a more important role than that of the increase in the reinforced strength of growing roots, resulting in a rapid decrease in the total reinforced root strength, with a minimum strength observed at about 9 years. Thus, even with prompt planting just after clear-cutting, a considerable loss of reinforced root strength can occur, reducing the total reinforced root strength to a fraction of its maximum value. However, total root strength increases from 9 years to about 25 years, after which it remains almost constant up to 50 years.

**Figure 8.** Changes in the total reinforced root strength of Japanese cedar according to the time after stump-cutting and new planting. **Figure 8.** Changes in the total reinforced root strength of Japanese cedar according to the time after stump-cutting and new planting.

harvested at the age of 50 years, and that seedlings are newly planted at the same time, the total reinforced root strength should be the sum of that of the decaying roots of the old stumps and the growing roots of the new stumps. Figure 8 shows the change in the total reinforced root strength at different depths according to the elapsed time up to 50 years. In the early stage, the decrease in the reinforced strength of decaying roots plays a more important role than that of the increase in the reinforced strength of growing roots, resulting in a rapid decrease in the total reinforced root strength, with a minimum strength observed at about 9 years. Thus, even with prompt planting just after clear-cutting, a considerable loss of reinforced root strength can occur, reducing the total reinforced root strength to a fraction of its maximum value. However, total root strength increases

Uprooting experiments have revealed changes in the strength of tree stumps [68], which have been discussed in relation to the effects of forests on shallow landslides in Japan [69]. In such experiments, the cut stumps of Japanese cedar trees were towed horizontally using a wire rope attached to a hand winch, and the mobilised maximum pullout forces when the cut stumps were removed from the ground were evaluated in relation to the stem volume. Because the sum of the uprooting strength of the decaying stumps and growing stumps was lowest at about 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting, these previous results were considered to explain why shallow landslides occur mostly during 10–15 years after clear-cutting and new planting [68]. Notably, these previous results are similar to the present findings. However, in these previous studies, the observed decrease in the uprooting strength of the cut stumps was not linear but rather negatively exponential according to the time after cutting. Regarding the decrease of strength under decay, 30% of the initial strength that remained at 10 years after cutting was finally lost at about 38 years. In addition, the rate of acceleration of the total strength after 10 years increased more slowly and gradually, continuing to increase up to 50 years. The minimum total strength at 10 years was about 60% of the initial strength, which was a lower reduction relative to that observed in our study. These results likely arose because the strength from the uprooting experiments was mostly related to the stump itself, rather than the roots in relatively deeper soil layers in which a probable sliding surface could form. Furthermore, Tsukamoto [70] indicated that the results of uprooting experiments explained the resistance strength against the uprooting of stumps but did not clarify how that strength was related to the resistance against sliding as a key factor of shallow landslide prevention. Therefore, a merit of our study is that the reinforced root strength on a sliding surface Uprooting experiments have revealed changes in the strength of tree stumps [68], which have been discussed in relation to the effects of forests on shallow landslides in Japan [69]. In such experiments, the cut stumps of Japanese cedar trees were towed horizontally using a wire rope attached to a hand winch, and the mobilised maximum pullout forces when the cut stumps were removed from the ground were evaluated in relation to the stem volume. Because the sum of the uprooting strength of the decaying stumps and growing stumps was lowest at about 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting, these previous results were considered to explain why shallow landslides occur mostly during 10–15 years after clear-cutting and new planting [68]. Notably, these previous results are similar to the present findings. However, in these previous studies, the observed decrease in the uprooting strength of the cut stumps was not linear but rather negatively exponential according to the time after cutting. Regarding the decrease of strength under decay, 30% of the initial strength that remained at 10 years after cutting was finally lost at about 38 years. In addition, the rate of acceleration of the total strength after 10 years increased more slowly and gradually, continuing to increase up to 50 years. The minimum total strength at 10 years was about 60% of the initial strength, which was a lower reduction relative to that observed in our study. These results likely arose because the strength from the uprooting experiments was mostly related to the stump itself, rather than the roots in relatively deeper soil layers in which a probable sliding surface could form. Furthermore, Tsukamoto [70] indicated that the results of uprooting experiments explained the resistance strength against the uprooting of stumps but did not clarify how that strength was related to the resistance against sliding as a key factor of shallow landslide prevention. Therefore, a merit of our study is that the reinforced root strength on a sliding surface was determined yearly as a factor for preventing shallow landslides.

was determined yearly as a factor for preventing shallow landslides. The newly proposed method for slope-stability analysis using three prisms (with a central quadrangular prism sandwiched between side triangular prisms) was applied to a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model in a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture (Figure 2). Specifically, a three-prism model with a width of 20 m was assumed for each grid on the map to calculate the safety factor, and the effects of Japanese cedar forest dynamics were examined at intervals of 5 years up to 50 years. The results of the slope-stability analysis, considering the aboveground weight of the trees, is shown in Figure 9 for three different times: (a) just after clear-cutting, when the roots of cut trunks are not rotten, (b) 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting, when the reinforced root strength is almost at its lowest value, and (c) 20 years after clear-cutting and new planting, when the reinforced root strength has recovered to a certain degree. As shown in Figure 9, the distribution of

red grids, indicating a safety factor of <1.0, just after clear-cutting (a), is similar to that o20 years after clear-cutting and immediate new planting (c), whereas markedly more red grids appear 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting (b), i.e., when the total reinforced root strength has almost reached its lowest value. forced root strength has recovered to a certain degree. As shown in Figure 9, the distribution of red grids, indicating a safety factor of <1.0, just after clear-cutting (a), is similar to that o20 years after clear-cutting and immediate new planting (c), whereas markedly more red grids appear 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting (b), i.e., when the total reinforced root strength has almost reached its lowest value.

was related to the resistance against sliding as a key factor of shallow landslide prevention. Therefore, a merit of our study is that the reinforced root strength on a sliding surface

The newly proposed method for slope-stability analysis using three prisms (with a central quadrangular prism sandwiched between side triangular prisms) was applied to a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model in a forest basin in Ibaraki Prefecture (Figure 2). Specifically, a three-prism model with a width of 20 m was assumed for each grid on the map to calculate the safety factor, and the effects of Japanese cedar forest dynamics were examined at intervals of 5 years up to 50 years. The results of the slope-stability analysis, considering the aboveground weight of the trees, is shown in Figure 9 for three different times: (a) just after clear-cutting, when the roots of cut trunks are not rotten, (b) 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting, when the reinforced root strength is almost at its lowest value, and (c) 20 years after clear-cutting and new planting, when the rein-

*Forests* **2023**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 18

was determined yearly as a factor for preventing shallow landslides.

**Figure 9.** Changes in unstable grids calculated for the forest basin with 284,204 grids in total under fully saturated conditions with the weight of stems (**a**) just after clear-cutting (number of unstable grids: 163,720), (**b**) 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting (number of unstable grids: 216,606), and (**c**) 20 years after new planting (number of unstable grids: 178,157). **Figure 9.** Changes in unstable grids calculated for the forest basin with 284,204 grids in total under fully saturated conditions with the weight of stems (**a**) just after clear-cutting (number of unstable grids: 163,720), (**b**) 10 years after clear-cutting and new planting (number of unstable grids: 216,606), and (**c**) 20 years after new planting (number of unstable grids: 178,157).

In Figure 10, the number of grids with a safety factor of <1.0 is shown according to the elapsed time after both clear-cutting and new planting. We found little difference between the safety factors with and without the aboveground weight of trees. The aboveground weight of trees is usually obtained by measuring the stem volume directly in situ; however, new methods incorporating high-density point-cloud data obtained with airborne or terrestrial laser scanners have been developed to construct 3-D tree models [71,72]. Nevertheless, as the aboveground weight of trees exerted little effect on the safety factor, we ignored these data in our stability analysis. Notably, in our stability analysis, the effect of the aboveground weight was investigated using the same ground water table conditions, i.e., the rainfall interception effect of trees, which diminishes the rainfall input [73], and the swaying of trees in the wind were not considered. These factors affect water table formation and groundwater infiltration and are driving forces in the initiation of sliding. We found that unstable grids rapidly increased for the first 5 years, peaked at 10 years, and then rapidly decreased from 10 to 20 years. After 30 years, the number of unstable grids remained almost constant. In Figure 10, the number of grids with a safety factor of <1.0 is shown according to the elapsed time after both clear-cutting and new planting. We found little difference between the safety factors with and without the aboveground weight of trees. The aboveground weight of trees is usually obtained by measuring the stem volume directly in situ; however, new methods incorporating high-density point-cloud data obtained with airborne or terrestrial laser scanners have been developed to construct 3-D tree models [71,72]. Nevertheless, as the aboveground weight of trees exerted little effect on the safety factor, we ignored these data in our stability analysis. Notably, in our stability analysis, the effect of the aboveground weight was investigated using the same ground water table conditions, i.e., the rainfall interception effect of trees, which diminishes the rainfall input [73], and the swaying of trees in the wind were not considered. These factors affect water table formation and groundwater infiltration and are driving forces in the initiation of sliding. We found that unstable grids rapidly increased for the first 5 years, peaked at 10 years, and then rapidly decreased from 10 to 20 years. After 30 years, the number of unstable grids remained almost constant. *Forests* **2022**, *13*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 18

**Figure 10.** Changes in the number of unstable grids according to slope-stability analysis over time (after Japanese cedar stump-cutting and new planting up to 50 years). **Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest. **Figure 10.** Changes in the number of unstable grids according to slope-stability analysis over time (after Japanese cedar stump-cutting and new planting up to 50 years).

The results of this study indicate that the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar tree roots decreases considerably between 5 and 15 years after clear-cutting and new planting,

By approximating the sum of the pullout forces of roots over a unit area on a possible sliding surface, the changes in the reinforcement of roots during the growth of trees after planting and decay of stumps after cutting were simulated. Our results indicated that the root reinforcement decreased linearly after clear-cutting, with the minimum resistance strength against shallow landslides observed at around 9 years. Subsequently, by about 25 years, the root reinforcement increased to a relatively constant value. We proposed a three-prism method to examine the effect of lateral roots across the side-flanks of shallow landslides on slope stability. Using this method on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model, a large number of unstable slopes were observed between 5 and 15 years after clear-cutting and new planting, indicating that appropriate forestry operations should be

lowering slope instability during this period should be considered important for prevent-

implemented during this period to prevent landslide disasters in forests.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

ests, and we express our sincere gratitude to ISHIGURI Hideto of the Forestry Agency.

**Author Contributions:** All the authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and data analysis were performed by Y.O., F.C., and U.K. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y.O., and all the authors commented on previous versions of the

**Funding:** This research work was funded by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council (MAFF Commissioned project study, Grant Number JPJ009840) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (c), Grant Number JP21K04601).

**Acknowledgments:** The authors should like to thank ABE Kazutoki of Nihon University for his valuable suggestions and advice. Our sincere appreciation goes to TSUBOYAMA Yoshio and KU-BOTA Tayoko of the Forest Research and Management Organization for providing the DEM data. We are indebted to FURUYA Naoyuki and MURAKAMI Wataru of the Forest Research and Management Organization for the useful discussions. The experiments were conducted in national for-

ing shallow landslides.

**5. Conclusions** 

The results of this study indicate that the reinforced strength of Japanese cedar tree roots decreases considerably between 5 and 15 years after clear-cutting and new planting, resulting in a rapid increase in slope instability. Thus, implementing forestry practices for lowering slope instability during this period should be considered important for preventing shallow landslides.

### **5. Conclusions**

By approximating the sum of the pullout forces of roots over a unit area on a possible sliding surface, the changes in the reinforcement of roots during the growth of trees after planting and decay of stumps after cutting were simulated. Our results indicated that the root reinforcement decreased linearly after clear-cutting, with the minimum resistance strength against shallow landslides observed at around 9 years. Subsequently, by about 25 years, the root reinforcement increased to a relatively constant value. We proposed a three-prism method to examine the effect of lateral roots across the side-flanks of shallow landslides on slope stability. Using this method on a 1-metre-resolution digital elevation model, a large number of unstable slopes were observed between 5 and 15 years after clear-cutting and new planting, indicating that appropriate forestry operations should be implemented during this period to prevent landslide disasters in forests.

**Author Contributions:** All the authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and data analysis were performed by Y.O., F.C. and U.K. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y.O. and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research work was funded by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council (MAFF Commissioned project study, Grant Number JPJ009840) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (c), Grant Number JP21K04601).

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors should like to thank ABE Kazutoki of Nihon University for his valuable suggestions and advice. Our sincere appreciation goes to TSUBOYAMA Yoshio and KUBOTA Tayoko of the Forest Research and Management Organization for providing the DEM data. We are indebted to FURUYA Naoyuki and MURAKAMI Wataru of the Forest Research and Management Organization for the useful discussions. The experiments were conducted in national forests, and we express our sincere gratitude to ISHIGURI Hideto of the Forestry Agency.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

### **Appendix A**


**Table A1.** Number of roots in each root-diameter class on a sliding surface at different depths and stand ages.


**Table A1.** *Cont.*

### **References**


**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
