*2.2. Chemical Structure of the Hydrogels*

hydrogel.

The spectra of SA and OSA are shown in Figure 2a. The peak located at 1736 cm−<sup>1</sup> in OSA spectra is the characteristic peak of -CHO [29,36], which is caused by the symmetric stretching vibration of C=O, indicating that the oxidation reaction was successful. Meanwhile, the peak of SA at 3430 cm−<sup>1</sup> is wider than that in OSA, which also indicates that the content of -OH decreased in OSA.

**Figure 2.** The FTIR spectrum of (**a**) SA and OSA; (**b**) GEL, PVA, and OSA; (**c**) PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels. (**d**) The XRD patterns of PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels. **Figure 2.** The FTIR spectrum of (**a**) SA and OSA; (**b**) GEL, PVA, and OSA; (**c**) PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels. (**d**) The XRD patterns of PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels.

*2.3. Mechanical Properties of Hydrogels*  The mechanical strength of the hydrogels was further quantified with compressive tests. The compressive stress–strain curves of the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels are shown in Figure 3a. It can be seen that the mechanical properties of the PGO-GS hydrogel are better than those of the PGO hydrogel. This is because the sheet-like shape of the GO Figure 2b shows the spectra of PVA and GEL. The peak at 3422 cm−<sup>1</sup> in the PVA spectrum was generated by hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups. The C-O stretching vibration in the crystalline region and amorphous region of PVA produced peaks at 1096 cm−<sup>1</sup> and 1045 cm−<sup>1</sup> , respectively. In GEL's spectrum, the stretching vibration and deformation vibration of -NH<sup>2</sup> are at the 3443 cm−<sup>1</sup> and 1677 cm−<sup>1</sup> peaks, respectively.

molecule, tubular shape of the SWNT molecule, and three kinds of macromolecular chains are intertwined to form a tighter, more stable network structure thanks to hydrogen bonding. During the compression process, part of the compression stress was transferred to the GO and SWNTs dispersed in the hydrogel, ultimately increasing in the compression strength of the PGO-GS hydrogel. However, the compressive strength of PGO-GS5 shows a decrease compared to PGO-GS3 (Figure 3b). This is mainly due to the agglomeration of GO and SWNT caused by the electrostatic force and van der Waals forces between the nanoparticles, resulting in a decrease in the mechanical properties of the hydrogel [40,41]. Notably, the addition of GO and SWNTs resulted in a compressive modulus of 42.2 kPa for the PGO-GS3 hydrogel, which is as much as eight times higher than that of PGO. Figure 2c shows the spectrum of the PGO hydrogel with different GO and SWNTs fractions. The enhancement peak at 3424 cm−<sup>1</sup> was caused by the overlap of hydrogen bonds. The peak of PGO-GS5 at 3424 cm−<sup>1</sup> is significantly weaker than the other samples. This may be attributable to the high content of GO and SWNTs, which leads to a certain degree of agglomeration of the two materials, thus affecting the formation of hydrogen bonds in the hydrogel. The peaks at 1636 cm−<sup>1</sup> and 1547 cm−<sup>1</sup> belong to C=N vibration, which occurred due to the formation of imine bonds. The peak at 1094 cm cm−<sup>1</sup> is stronger than that at 1037 cm−<sup>1</sup> , indicating that PVA has higher crystallinity and forms hydrogen bonds with the other two macromolecules. The peak at 1094 cm−<sup>1</sup> of the PGO-GS5 spectrum is weak, which further indicates that high GO and SWNTs fractions will hinder the formation of hydrogen bonds between three macromolecules. In general, the addition of GO and SWNT does not significantly change the composition of the organic functional groups in the PGO hydrogel.

The formation of the PGO-GS hydrogel was also analyzed by XRD. Figure 2d shows the XRD patterns of the hydrogels with different GO and SWNTs fractions. PGO-GS formed a low-intensity diffraction peak at 2θ = 15.4◦ , which is the characteristic peak of GO. The curve shows distinct peaks at 2θ = 15◦ , 22◦ , and 34◦ , which are typical XRD patterns for OSA [29]. The XRD pattern of the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogel shows a wide, amorphous diffraction peak centered at 2θ = 22.7◦ . It is well known that GEL and PVA express their ordered structure at around 2θ = 20◦ [28,37,38], and that amorphous PVA phase produces a weak band at 2θ = 42◦ [39]. The PGO-GS composite hydrogel has a weaker diffraction peak at 2θ = 14.75◦ than the PGO hydrogel, indicating that the addition of GO and SWNTs attenuates the crystallization of PVA. In addition, there is no significant difference between the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels. All the samples have similar curves, which shows that the incorporation of GO sheets and SWNTs has no obvious effect on the crystallinity of PVA and GEL. It has been confirmed that there is no significant phase separation appearing in this system, indicating that GO and SWNTs are well dispersed in the PGO-GS hydrogel.

#### *2.3. Mechanical Properties of Hydrogels*

The mechanical strength of the hydrogels was further quantified with compressive tests. The compressive stress–strain curves of the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels are shown in Figure 3a. It can be seen that the mechanical properties of the PGO-GS hydrogel are better than those of the PGO hydrogel. This is because the sheet-like shape of the GO molecule, tubular shape of the SWNT molecule, and three kinds of macromolecular chains are intertwined to form a tighter, more stable network structure thanks to hydrogen bonding. During the compression process, part of the compression stress was transferred to the GO and SWNTs dispersed in the hydrogel, ultimately increasing in the compression strength of the PGO-GS hydrogel. However, the compressive strength of PGO-GS5 shows a decrease compared to PGO-GS3 (Figure 3b). This is mainly due to the agglomeration of GO and SWNT caused by the electrostatic force and van der Waals forces between the nanoparticles, resulting in a decrease in the mechanical properties of the hydrogel [40,41]. Notably, the addition of GO and SWNTs resulted in a compressive modulus of 42.2 kPa for the PGO-GS3 hydrogel, which is as much as eight times higher than that of PGO. *Gels* **2023**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 16

### *2.4. Conductive Properties of Hydrogels*

*2.4. Conductive Properties of Hydrogels*  Figure 4a shows the brightness of an LED when the hydrogel was connected to the displayed circuit. It can be seen that the conductivity of the PGO hydrogel improves with the increasing content of GO and SWNTs. Figure 4b shows the resistance curves for 500 measurements of the different hydrogels. It can be seen that the resistance of the hydrogel measured when it was first connected to the circuit has a large deviation. Therefore, the resistance values of the first 100 measurements were discarded, and only the last 400 measurements were kept to calculate the mean value and determine the standard deviation in this paper (the subsequent resistance measurements are treated in the same way). The conductivity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel reached 29.6 mS/m, which is 1.5 times that of the PGO hydrogel. This is mainly attributed to the conductive network formed by the GO sheets and SWNTs inside the hydrogel. The increasing content of GO and SWNTs can Figure 4a shows the brightness of an LED when the hydrogel was connected to the displayed circuit. It can be seen that the conductivity of the PGO hydrogel improves with the increasing content of GO and SWNTs. Figure 4b shows the resistance curves for 500 measurements of the different hydrogels. It can be seen that the resistance of the hydrogel measured when it was first connected to the circuit has a large deviation. Therefore, the resistance values of the first 100 measurements were discarded, and only the last 400 measurements were kept to calculate the mean value and determine the standard deviation in this paper (the subsequent resistance measurements are treated in the same way). The conductivity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel reached 29.6 mS/m, which is 1.5 times that of the PGO hydrogel. This is mainly attributed to the conductive network formed by the GO sheets and SWNTs inside the hydrogel. The increasing content of GO and SWNTs can significantly promote the density of the conductive network, resulting in higher

significantly promote the density of the conductive network, resulting in higher conductivity. However, when the sum of the two fillers divided by the mass of GEL is more than 4.5%, the growth rate of the conductivity is significantly reduced. This phenomenon may

Interestingly, we found that when the wires were placed on either side of the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels, the brightness of the LED would gradually darken with the folding of the hydrogel (Figure 4c). Therefore, the electrical conductivity of the hydrogel was also tested at different degrees of bending (Table S1). When the distance between the two electrodes decreased from 5 cm to 1 cm, the conductivity of the PGO hydrogel decreased from 19.11 to 18.73 mS/m, and the conductivity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel decreased from 29.13 to 26.60 mS/m. The variation range of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel is about 8.6%, which demonstrates the PGO-GS3 hydrogel's potential as a flexible, electronic sensing skin.

conductivity. However, when the sum of the two fillers divided by the mass of GEL is more than 4.5%, the growth rate of the conductivity is significantly reduced. This phenomenon may be caused by the uneven dispersion of GO and SWNTs.

Interestingly, we found that when the wires were placed on either side of the PGO and PGO-GS hydrogels, the brightness of the LED would gradually darken with the folding of the hydrogel (Figure 4c). Therefore, the electrical conductivity of the hydrogel was also tested at different degrees of bending (Table S1). When the distance between the two electrodes decreased from 5 cm to 1 cm, the conductivity of the PGO hydrogel decreased from 19.11 to 18.73 mS/m, and the conductivity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel decreased from 29.13 to 26.60 mS/m. The variation range of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel is about 8.6%, which demonstrates the PGO-GS3 hydrogel's potential as a flexible, electronic sensing skin. *Gels* **2023**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 16

**Figure 4.** (**a**) The brightness of LED when hydrogel was connected to the circuit. (**b**) The conductivity and resistance of hydrogels. (**c**) The brightness of the LED when bending the hydrogel. (The applied voltage of all displayed circuits is 10 V.) **Figure 4.** (**a**) The brightness of LED when hydrogel was connected to the circuit. (**b**) The conductivity and resistance of hydrogels. (**c**) The brightness of the LED when bending the hydrogel. (The applied voltage of all displayed circuits is 10 V.)

Therefore, the PGO-GS3 hydrogel was selected to evaluate the self-healing performance

It can be seen that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel has superior comprehensive properties by

Figure 5a shows that both the PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogels have good self-healing properties. After 24 h of self-healing, both hydrogels were able to bear their own weights. After 48 h, although the cut marks were still visible, the hydrogels had completely healed

The typical stress–strain data of the original PGO-GS3 hydrogel and the self-healing hydrogel are shown in Figure 5b. After 48 h of healing, the fracture strength and

and other subsequent performances and applications.

and could withstand various tensile forces.

*2.5. Self-Healing Property of Hydrogels* 

#### *2.5. Self-Healing Property of Hydrogels* face.

*Gels* **2023**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 16

It can be seen that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel has superior comprehensive properties by analyzing the swelling, mechanical, and conductive properties of the different hydrogels. Therefore, the PGO-GS3 hydrogel was selected to evaluate the self-healing performance and other subsequent performances and applications. The conductivity-related self-healing performance of the hydrogels was also verified, as shown in Figure 5c. Although the brightness of the LED decreased slightly after 48 h of self-healing, its conductivity recovered to more than 95% of the initial value. This also suggests that the imine bonds and hydrogen bonds help the hydrogel reconstruct the net-

elongation at break reached 0.13 MPa and 40.9%, respectively, which were 68% and 57% of the initial hydrogel (0.19 MPa and 71.2%). This is the result of hydrogen bonds and imine bonds formed between the molecular chains of PVA and GEL on the fracture's sur-

Figure 5a shows that both the PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogels have good self-healing properties. After 24 h of self-healing, both hydrogels were able to bear their own weights. After 48 h, although the cut marks were still visible, the hydrogels had completely healed and could withstand various tensile forces. work structure during the self-healing process. For further investigation, the PGO hydrogel was selected to observe the self-healing process under an optical microscope (Figure 5d). It can be seen that most of the gaps between the cut areas of the PGO hydrogel disappeared after 48 h of self-healing.

**Figure 5.** (**a**) Photos of the self-healing process of hydrogels. (**b**) The tensile curves of the initial hydrogel and the 48 h self-healing hydrogel (PGO-GS3). (**c**) Conductivity of initial hydrogel and the 48 h self-healing process of the hydrogel (PGO-GS3). (**d**) The self-healing process of the PGO hydrogel under optical microscope. **Figure 5.** (**a**) Photos of the self-healing process of hydrogels. (**b**) The tensile curves of the initial hydrogel and the 48 h self-healing hydrogel (PGO-GS3). (**c**) Conductivity of initial hydrogel and the 48 h self-healing process of the hydrogel (PGO-GS3). (**d**) The self-healing process of the PGO hydrogel under optical microscope.

The typical stress–strain data of the original PGO-GS3 hydrogel and the self-healing hydrogel are shown in Figure 5b. After 48 h of healing, the fracture strength and elongation at break reached 0.13 MPa and 40.9%, respectively, which were 68% and 57% of the initial hydrogel (0.19 MPa and 71.2%). This is the result of hydrogen bonds and imine bonds formed between the molecular chains of PVA and GEL on the fracture's surface.

The conductivity-related self-healing performance of the hydrogels was also verified, as shown in Figure 5c. Although the brightness of the LED decreased slightly after 48 h of self-healing, its conductivity recovered to more than 95% of the initial value. This also suggests that the imine bonds and hydrogen bonds help the hydrogel reconstruct the network structure during the self-healing process. *Gels* **2023**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 16

> For further investigation, the PGO hydrogel was selected to observe the self-healing process under an optical microscope (Figure 5d). It can be seen that most of the gaps between the cut areas of the PGO hydrogel disappeared after 48 h of self-healing. *2.6. Electronic Skin*

#### *2.6. Electronic Skin* To explore the ability of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel to monitor human movement and

To explore the ability of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel to monitor human movement and recognize speech, the PGO-GS3 hydrogel was attached to the fingers and throat of a subject to detect the signals generated by finger bending and speaking. Figure 6a shows the realtime resistance change of the hydrogel during finger bending. Obviously, the bending of fingers can sufficiently stimulate the hydrogel so as to generate regular electrical signals. In addition, the throat vibrations caused by human speech can also be accurately captured (Figure 6b–d). It can be seen from the comparison that the feedback signal of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel is different for different words, which proves that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel has the potential to be used in speech recognition. recognize speech, the PGO-GS3 hydrogel was attached to the fingers and throat of a subject to detect the signals generated by finger bending and speaking. Figure 6a shows the real-time resistance change of the hydrogel during finger bending. Obviously, the bending of fingers can sufficiently stimulate the hydrogel so as to generate regular electrical signals. In addition, the throat vibrations caused by human speech can also be accurately captured (Figure 6b–d). It can be seen from the comparison that the feedback signal of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel is different for different words, which proves that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel has the potential to be used in speech recognition.

**Figure 6.** Sensing signals of encapsulated hydrogel corresponding to (**a**) finger bending, (**b**) the vocalization of the word "Nice", (**c**) the vocalization of the word "LOVE," and (**d**) the vocalization of the word "China". **Figure 6.** Sensing signals of encapsulated hydrogel corresponding to (**a**) finger bending, (**b**) the vocalization of the word "Nice", (**c**) the vocalization of the word "LOVE," and (**d**) the vocalization of the word "China".

A CCK8 assay was performed to determine the L929 cells' viability after being cultured in 10% hydrogel leach liquor solution. The experimental results are shown in Table

Although the survival rate of the cells cultured in 10% leach liquor solution is lower than that of the control group, the cell survival rates in both groups are much higher than 50% after 48 h of incubation. This indicates that both the PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogels

As a comparison, the cell survival rate of PGO-GS3 group (95.3%) was significantly higher than that of PGO experimental group (75.8%). This indicates that the addition of GO and SWNTs has a potential effect on cell proliferation. In this study, the activity levels may be related to the good mechanical properties and porosity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel. Overall, the above biological evaluations prove that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel possess good potential for use as a biomaterial for flexible bionic electronic skin that does not

*2.7. Cytocompatibility* 

have good cell capability.

cause cellular inflammation.

2.

### *2.7. Cytocompatibility*

A CCK8 assay was performed to determine the L929 cells' viability after being cultured in 10% hydrogel leach liquor solution. The experimental results are shown in Table 2.

**Table 2.** The viability of cells incubated with hydrogel leach liquor for 48 h.


Although the survival rate of the cells cultured in 10% leach liquor solution is lower than that of the control group, the cell survival rates in both groups are much higher than 50% after 48 h of incubation. This indicates that both the PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogels have good cell capability.

As a comparison, the cell survival rate of PGO-GS3 group (95.3%) was significantly higher than that of PGO experimental group (75.8%). This indicates that the addition of GO and SWNTs has a potential effect on cell proliferation. In this study, the activity levels may be related to the good mechanical properties and porosity of the PGO-GS3 hydrogel.

Overall, the above biological evaluations prove that the PGO-GS3 hydrogel possess good potential for use as a biomaterial for flexible bionic electronic skin that does not cause cellular inflammation.

#### **3. Conclusions**

In this study, a series of conductive composite hydrogels were successfully constructed by introducing GO and SWNTs into a PVA/GEL/OSA ternary hydrogel system. The SA was successfully oxidized and formed dynamic imine bonds with the GEL, which gave the hydrogel good self-healing properties. The obtained self-healing properties restored 68% of the hydrogels' original breaking strength and over 95% of their electrical conductivity. The addition of PVA effectively improves the toughness of the hydrogels, and the introductions of GO and SWNTs effectively enhance the electrical and mechanical properties of the hydrogels. The compressive modulus and electrical conductivity of the PGO-GS hydrogel are 42.2 kPa and 29.6 mS/m, respectively, i.e., 8.2 and 1.5 times higher than those of pure PGO. In addition, the cytocompatibility tests not only demonstrated the good biocompatibility of the PGO-GS hydrogels but also showed that GO and SWNTs have a potentially positive effect on cell proliferation. Notably, PGO-GS conductive hydrogels can quickly capture external stimulations, including human movement and speech, and give correspondingly accurate and timely electrical signal feedback. Compared to similar studies [29,30,37], PGO-GS hydrogels have better self-healing properties (conductivity and tensile properties), higher electrical conductivity, and better biocompatibility. These properties indicate that PGO-GS hydrogels have promising applications in the field of electronic skin, such as voice recognition, human movement, and health monitoring.

#### **4. Materials and Methods**

#### *4.1. Materials*

GO and SWNTs were purchased from Jiacai Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Sodium alginate (SA) (1.05~1.15 Pa·S) was purchased from Fuchen Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). GEL (BR, jelly strength ≥ 220) was purchased from Qiansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hefei, China). Sodium chloride (NaCl) (AR) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). PVA (polymerization degree 1799, 98% alcoholysis), Ethanol (C2H6O) (99.7%), Sodium periodate (NaIO4, AR, 99.5%), and Ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) (GC, >99%) were obtained from McLean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Potassium bromide (KBr) was purchased from Tianguang

Optical Instrument Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Deionized (DI) water was obtained using the pure water machine in our laboratory.

#### *4.2. Preparation of OSA*

The oxidation of SA was carried out according to a previously reported method, as shown in Figure 7a [42,43]. In brief, SA (10 g) was dispersed in ethanol (50 mL) in a water bath at 40 ◦C. Then, 50 mL NaIO<sup>4</sup> solution (5 g) was added into the SA solution to react for 4 h, which was put on a magnetic stirrer in the dark at 25 ◦C. Then, 7.5 mL of C2H6O<sup>2</sup> and 5 g of NaCl were added and quenched for 0.5 h under stirring. The sediment was filtered out through a vacuum filtration device. The final product was washed with C2H6O three times and then vacuum-dried at 35 ◦C for 24 h to obtain OSA. *Gels* **2023**, *9*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 16

**Figure 7.** (**a**) Preparation process of OSA. (**b**) Mass fraction of each component solution of composite hydrogel. (**c**) Preparatory process for PGO-GS hydrogel. *4.3. Preparation of Hydrogel* **Figure 7.** (**a**) Preparation process of OSA. (**b**) Mass fraction of each component solution of composite hydrogel. (**c**) Preparatory process for PGO-GS hydrogel.

#### *4.3. Preparation of Hydrogel*

In order to prepare PVA–GEL–OSA–GO–SWNT hydrogels with different compositions (Figure 7b,c), GEL (15 wt %) was dissolved in DI water at 55 ◦C and stirred for 0.5 h. The prepared OSA (12 wt %) was dissolved in DI water at 45 ◦C and stirred for 0.5 h. PVA (10 wt %) was dispersed in DI water in a 98 ◦C water bath with stirring for 2 h to form a solution. After defoaming at 20 ◦C for 5 h, 10 mL PVA solution was added to 10 mL GEL solution; then, the mixed solution was magnetically stirred at 40 ◦C for 0.5 h. Subsequently, the same volumes of GO (1 wt %) and SWNT (0.5 wt %) dispersions were added to PVA– GEL mixed solution in corresponding proportions and stirred for 1 h. Finally, 10 mL of OSA solution was added to the above mixed solution and stirred at 40 ◦C for 0.5 h. The final solution was poured into a mold and left at 20 ◦C for 1.5 h. Then, the mold was frozen at −20 ◦C for 12 h and thawed at 20 ◦C for 2 h, which is known as a freeze–thaw cycle. The freeze–thaw cycle was repeated 3 times to obtain PVA–GEL–OSA–GO–SWNT hydrogel. The hydrogel is named PGO-GSx, where x represents the mass fraction of GO relative to gelatin. Pure PVA–GEL–OSA hydrogel was prepared by the same method (it was named PGO hydrogel).

### *4.4. Characterization*

#### 4.4.1. Constituent Analysis

FT-IR spectroscopic measurements were performed using an infrared spectrometer (ALPHA II, BRUKER, Salbruken, GER). The hydrogel sample was placed in an oven (DGG-9140A; LINPIN, Shanghai, CHN) at 35 ◦C for 36 h to dehydrate it completely. Then, the sample was placed into an agate mortar and ground into powder by adding liquid nitrogen. Finally, the FT-IR spectrum of the sample was analyzed using the KBr method [44].

The diffraction patterns of PGO-GS hydrogels were detected by an X-ray diffractometer (D8 DISCOVER A25, BRUKER, Salbruken, GER) using Co K radiation. The range of 2θ was 5~90◦ . The scanning rate was 0.1◦/s, and the scanning step was 0.02◦ .

#### 4.4.2. Structural Analysis

The surface morphologies of hydrogels were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (TM4000PLUS, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). The hydrogel samples were freeze-dried for 24 h with a freeze dryer (TF-FD-27, Tianfeng, Shanghai, China), and then the surfaces of the samples were sprayed with gold for observation.

The density of hydrogels was calculated by dividing the mass of the freeze-dried hydrogel by its volume. Cylindrical hydrogels were obtained by molding and freezedrying for 24 h. The diameter and height of each hydrogel were measured, using a vernier caliper to calculate the volume. Each sample was measured 5 times and the mean value was reported.

The porosity of hydrogels was measured according to the alcohol displacement method [45]. Briefly, the freeze-dried hydrogels were weighed (*W<sup>d</sup>* ) and immersed in anhydrous ethanol at 25 ◦C for 12 h. The wet hydrogels (*Ww*) were then weighed again. The porosity was determined by the following equation:

$$\text{Porosity} = \frac{W\_w - W\_d}{\rho V}$$

where *ρ* is the absolute ethyl alcohol density (0.789 g/cm<sup>3</sup> ), and *V* is the volume of freezedried hydrogel.

The swelling behavior of PGO-GS hydrogel was studied in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at 25 ◦C. The freeze-dried hydrogels were immersed in the PBS (pH = 7.4) for 24 h. After the sample was taken out, the water on the swollen hydrogel's surface was wiped off with absorbent paper, and then the hydrogel was weighed with an electronic balance (PKM124ZH; OHAUS, Pine Brook, NJ, USA). The swelling ratio was calculated by the following equation:

Swelling ratio = (*W<sup>s</sup>* − *Wd*)/*W<sup>d</sup>*

where *W<sup>d</sup>* and *W<sup>s</sup>* are the weights of dried and swollen samples, respectively.

#### 4.4.3. Mechanical Performance

The mechanical tests were carried out using a universal testing machine (CTM2500; Liangong, Dezhou, Shandong Province, China). The compressive mechanical properties of PGO-GS hydrogels were measured with cylindrical samples (H = 50 mm and d = 10 mm). The compressive speed was set as 1 mm/min and the compressive modulus was calculated from the approximate linear fitting values of the stress–strain curves within the strain range of 30~40%. The tensile test used to evaluate the self-healing property of PGO-GS3 was carried out with a rectangular sample (L = 50 mm, W = 12 mm, and H = 5 mm) at a speed of 5 mm/min.

In the previous specifications, L is the length of the hydrogel, W is the width of the hydrogel, H is the height of the hydrogel, and d is the diameter of the hydrogel. The meanings of the three letters provided below are the same.

#### 4.4.4. Conductive Property Measurement

The conductivity of the hydrogel was determined through observing the brightness of an LED bulb in the entire circuit when the hydrogels with different deformations were connected. The circuit was powered by DC stabilized constant current power supply (SPD3303C, Dingyang Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, CHN).

The electric resistance of the hydrogel (L = 50 mm, W = 8 mm, and H = 4 mm) was tested with a digital source meter (Keithley 6500, Beaverton, OR, USA). The conductivity (*σ*) of the sample was calculated using the following formula:

$$
\sigma = \frac{I}{Rs}
$$

where *l* and *s* are the length and cross-sectional area of the hydrogel sample, respectively. *R* is the measured resistance.

#### 4.4.5. Self-Healing Behaviors

In order to study the self-healing behavior of PGO-GS hydrogels at room temperature, the hydrogel samples were cut into two halves using a knife. Then, the two hydrogels were placed together without any external stimulation. After 48 h, the tensile stress–strain curves of the self-healing PGO-GS3 hydrogels (L = 20 mm, W = 12 mm, and H = 5 mm) were measured again with a universal testing machine. The self-healing process of the PGO hydrogel at different time points was observed using an orthostatic metallographic microscope (9XB-PC, Shangguang, Shanghai, CHN). The PGO-GS3 hydrogel is black and thus could not be observed under an optical microscope.

#### 4.4.6. Cytocompatibility Test

Mouse epithelioid fibroblast cells (L929) were used to evaluate the biocompatibility of the hydrogels. All cell culture-related reagents were purchased from Bojin Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China).

Both PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogel pieces (L = 5 mm, W = 5 mm, and H = 5 mm) were placed in a glass petri dish and sterilized under ultraviolet radiation for 4 h. Then, one part of PGO and PGO-GS3 hydrogels was immersed in 10 mL PBS for 48 h to extract the leach solution.

To test CCK8, 4 testing groups were created and each group included 10 wells of a 96-well plate. No cells were seeded in the first group for blank well absorption value measurements. The cells were seeded at a density of 7 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>4</sup> cells/mL per well in the second, third, and fourth groups. For all groups, 90 µL cell media (first group) or cell suspension (other groups, ~6 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>3</sup> cells per well) were added in each well. For each well in all groups, each surrounding well was filled with 100 µL of PBS if it was empty. This ensured that all the wells in all groups were surrounded by wells filled with the same amount of solution. The cells were incubated at 5% CO<sup>2</sup> and 37 ◦C for 12 h for cell attachment. Then, the 10 µL PBS leach liquors of PGO and PGO-GS3 were added into each well in the third and fourth groups (PGO and PGO-GS3 experimental groups), respectively. A total of 10 µL of PBS was added into each well in the first (blank group) and the second group (control group).

After incubation for 48 h, the cell viability was evaluated through CCK-8 (EnoGene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China) assay. Briefly, 10 µL CCK-8 solution and 90 µL cell culture medium were added into each well and incubated at 37 ◦C for 3 h. The light absorbance at the wavelength of 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Multiskan Go, Thermal fisher, Massachusetts, USA) for each well to calculate the cell viability. The cell survival rate was calculated using the equation below:

$$\text{Sur\%} = \frac{(\text{A}\_{\text{s}} - \text{A}\_{\text{b}})}{(\text{A}\_{\text{c}} - \text{A}\_{\text{b}})} \times 100\%$$

where Sur % is the cell survival rate, A<sup>s</sup> is the absorbance of the experimental group, A<sup>b</sup> is the absorbance of the blank group, and A<sup>c</sup> is the absorbance of the control group.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/gels9020155/s1, Figure S1: The swelling ratios of hydrogels; Table S1: The conductivity of hydrogels at different degrees of bending.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, X.C., M.L. and J.Z.; Validation, X.C., H.Z., J.C., C.W. and Z.L.; Formal analysis, X.C.; Data curation, X.C.; Writing—original draft, X.C.; Writing—review & editing, Y.W. and Q.W.; Funding acquisition, Y.W. and Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded by the National key R&D plan (2022YFB3304000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52275292); the Shaanxi Province Key Research and Development Projects (2021LLRH08); the Science and technology planning project of Xian (20KYPT0002-1); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (D5000220299).

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

**Acknowledgments:** Figure 7 was modified from Servier Medical Art (http://smart.servier.com/), licensed under a Creative Common Attribution 3.0 Generic License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/).

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**


**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
