*3.2. Splitting Tensile Strength (STS)*

A comparison of relative STS of the various concrete percentage combinations formed with 100% reference and numerous ratios of recycled aggregate replacing reference aggregates, with and without waste glass are shown in Figure 5. As presented in Figure 5, the results of STS commonly pursue a similar tendency as the compressive strength. As observed from Figure 5, the remarkable improvement in concrete tensile strength is up to 10% with waste glass used as a fractional replacement for cement. Upon altering the amount of waste glass, consequences of tensile strength are influenced similarly to the CS. As shown in Figure 5, tensile strength optimal norms are found at 10% waste glass obligating maximum divided tensile. A comparative evaluation was performed where controller concrete tensile strength was deliberate as reference strength, from which concrete of the changing ratio of waste glass is collated. At 10% substitution of waste glass, STS is only 3% lower than the reference mix. The correlation of CS in competition with STS is provided in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, the regression model among the compressive and STS appeared to be flat. Furthermore, as observed in Figure 6, the regression stroke represents a strong relationship between CS contrasted with STS having an R2 worth of more than 94 percent.

**Figure 5.** Results of STS.

**Figure 6.** STS versus CS.
