**Structural and Biological Properties of Heteroligand Copper Complexes with Diethylnicotinamide and Various Fenamates: Preparation, Structure, Spectral Properties and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis**

**Milan Piroš <sup>1</sup> , Martin Schoeller <sup>1</sup> , Katarína Ko ˇnariková 2 , Jindra Valentová 3 , L'ubomír Švorc <sup>4</sup> , Ján Moncol' <sup>1</sup> , Marian Valko <sup>5</sup> and Jozef Švorec 1,\***


**Abstract:** Herein, we discuss the synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization, and biological activity of five heteroligand copper(II) complexes with diethylnicotinamide and various fenamates, as follows: flufenamate (fluf), niflumate (nifl), tolfenamate (tolf), clonixinate (clon), mefenamate (mef) and *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide (dena). The complexes of composition: [Cu(fluf)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**1**), [Cu(nifl)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> ] (**2**), [Cu(tolf)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**3**), [Cu(clon)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> ] (**4**) and [Cu(mef)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**5**), were synthesized, structurally (single-crystal X-ray diffraction) and spectroscopically characterized (IR, EA, UV-Vis and EPR). The studied complexes are monomeric, forming a distorted tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the central copper ion. The crystal structures of all five complexes were determined and refined with an aspheric model using the Hirshfeld atom refinement method. Hirshfeld surface analysis and fingerprint plots were used to investigate the intermolecular interactions in the crystalline state. The redox properties of the complexes were studied and evaluated via cyclic voltammetry. The complexes exhibited good superoxide scavenging activity as determined by an NBT assay along with a copper-based redox-cycling mechanism, resulting in the formation of ROS, which, in turn, predisposed the studied complexes for their anticancer activity. The ability of complexes **1–4** to interact with calf thymus DNA was investigated using absorption titrations, viscosity measurements and an ethidium-bromide-displacement-fluorescence-based method, suggesting mainly the intercalative binding of the complexes to DNA. The affinity of complexes **1–4** for bovine serum albumin was determined via fluorescence emission spectroscopy and was quantitatively characterized with the corresponding binding constants. The cytotoxic properties of complexes **1–4** were studied using the cancer cell lines A549, MCF-7 and U-118MG, as well as healthy MRC-5 cells. Complex **4** exhibited moderate anticancer activity on the MCF-7 cancer cells with *IC*<sup>50</sup> = 57 µM.

**Keywords:** copper(II) complexes; fenamates; Hirshfeld atom refinement; interactions with DNA; SOD mimetic activity

### **1. Introduction**

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a very broad class of drugs that are widely used to treat conditions associated with acute or chronic inflammation,

**Citation:** Piroš, M.; Schoeller, M.; Ko ˇnariková, K.; Valentová, J.; Švorc, L'.; Moncol', J.; Valko, M.; Švorec, J. Structural and Biological Properties of Heteroligand Copper Complexes with Diethylnicotinamide and Various Fenamates: Preparation, Structure, Spectral Properties and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, 108. https:// doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11030108

Academic Editor: Wolfgang Linert

Received: 14 February 2023 Revised: 27 February 2023 Accepted: 28 February 2023 Published: 6 March 2023

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

such as pain or rheumatoid arthritis, and are also often used extensively for fever due to their analgesic or antipyretic effects [1–3]. A mode of their pharmacologic action is mostly based on the suppression of prostanoid production (important inflammatory mediators) by the inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes that catalyze prostanoid biosynthesis from arachidonic acid [3,4]. In addition, an alternative mechanism independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition was proposed [4]. This mechanism involves a direct effect of NSAIDs on mitochondria, leading to cellular oxidative stress and apoptosis [4]. From a chemical point of view, NSAIDs are predominantly weak acids that contain an acidic moiety together with an aromatic functional group. According to their chemical characteristics, NSAIDs can be roughly classified as derivates of carboxylic acids (salicylic, acetic and anthranilic), oxicams, sulfonamides or furanones [5].

Fenamates form a subgroup within NSAIDs and are derived from 2-anilinobenzoic (fenamic) acid. They are known to have anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activities in animals or humans mainly through the inhibition of cyclooxygenases [6]. Typical examples of fenamates are mefenamic acid, used to treat mild or moderate pain; flufenamic acid, used to treat rheumatic disorders; and tolfenamic acid, known as the drug Clotam, used to treat migraine headaches or as a veterinary drug [7,8] (Scheme 1). The derivates of 2-phenylaminonicotinic acid, such as niflumic acid or clonixin (Scheme 1), are also formally included as fenamates. Like other fenamates, they are mostly used as analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or for pain relief [7]. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 31

**Scheme 1.** Chemical formulae of used ligands. **Scheme 1.** Chemical formulae of used ligands.

**2. Results and Discussion**  *2.1. Synthesis*  The complexes under study were obtained in moderate yields (57–75%) using a complexation reaction between corresponding fenamic acid and NaOH with copper acetate dihydrate and *N, N-*diethylnicotinamide (in a molar ratio of 2:2:1:2) in Nicotinic acid derivatives, such as *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide, as well as nicotinamide or isonicotinamide, form an important class of heterocyclic pyridinecarboxamide compounds that are often used as a neutral N-donor ligand for the construction of hydrogenbonded coordination networks and polymers [9]. Nicotinamide derivates alone exhibit interesting biological activities, including anticancer or anti-angiogenic properties, [10] and can exhibit herbicidal and antifungal activities [11].

ethanol/methanol, according to Scheme 2. All five complexes are stable in the air, and their compositions were characterized with elemental analysis and IR spectroscopy, as well as with X-ray diffraction. The elemental analysis of the complexes is in agreement with the calculated values for the corresponding formulae: [Cu(fluf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**1**), [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**)**,** [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**), [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) and [Cu(mef)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**5**). The exact crystal structures and compositions of the complexes were fully confirmed via single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Copper(II) complexes with NSAID ligands are now attractive objects for inorganic, pharmaceutical and medicinal chemists due to their potential to be effective anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal or antiviral agents [12–17]. Such metal complexes often display lower toxicity and, at the same time, higher pharmaceutical efficiency than the parent NSAID drug. Ternary copper NSAID complexes containing other biologically active ancillary ligands (e.g. substituted pyridines or 1.10-phenantroline) offer a possibility how to successfully modify a coordination sphere of studied complexes toward desired activities [12,18–20]. Numerous copper complexes with NSAID, and especially with fenamates and *N*-donor ligands, such as pyridine and its derivates (2,2'-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline), were studied by Psomas and coworkers [21–26]. These complexes show significant antioxidant activity, as well as an excellent ability to scavenge hydroxyl

and superoxide radicals [5]. Furthermore, copper complexes with meclofenamate show potential to be a successful anti-dementia agents [25].

In order to combine the proinflammatory ROS-mediating properties of copper(II) fenamate ligands and the ability to intercalate with the DNA of phenanthroline ligands, Simunkova and coworkers [27] prepared and studied three copper fenamates (tolfenamate, mefenamate and flufenamate) with 1,10-phenanthroline as potential anticancer copper compounds, giving the best results for a complex of the composition [Cu(fluf)2phen]. Furthermore, Jozefíková and coworkers synthesized and investigated copper complexes with nicotinamide [28], isonicotinamide [29] and fenamates, showing that this type of complex exhibits promising biological activity, especially in the case of niflumate and clonixinate complexes.

In this context, we decided to prepare and characterize copper(II) complexes with dena ligands and various fenamates with the general formula of either [CuL2(dena)2] or [CuL'2(dena)2(H2O)2], where L = flufenamate (**1**), tolfenamate (**3**), mefenamate (**5**) and L'= niflumate (**2**) or clonixinate (**4**) in connection with their biological activity. Although the [CuL2(dena)2(H2O)2] (L = fluf [30], tolf [31] and mef [32]) and [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] [33] complexes were already previously prepared and crystallograhically characterized, the solution of their crystal structure showed some flaws. As an example, the crystal structures of [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] and [Cu(mef)2(dena)2(H2O)2] were solved without the inclusion of apparently resolved disorders, and in the latter case, the coordinates of the crystal structures were missing in the CCD database [31,32]. Moreover, the crystal structure of [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] contains some incorrectly assigned atoms [33]. Taking these facts into account, we prepared all four complexes again. In addition, novel copper(II) complex with clonixinate anion and dena ligand with a composition of [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] was synthesized. Subsequently, single-crystal data of all five complexes were obtained at a low temperature (100 K) and high redundancy. In turn, the crystal structures of **1–5** were refined by means of an aspheric model using the Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR) method, thus providing more precise structural parameters. The study of intermolecular interactions in the crystal structures of all complexes was augmented by the Hirshfeld surface analyses. Moreover, the structural and spectroscopic data of the complexes are discussed in connection with biological activity to find structure–activity relationship correlations. Our choice of fenamate ligands in this study was influenced by the observation that a pyridin ring containing analogs of copper fenamates shows better biological activity than their benzene analogs (niflumic vs. flufenamic and clonixin vs. tolfenamic acid) [29]. The presence of coplanarity of the aromatic rings in copper niflumates and clonixinate, in comparison with their copper flufenamate and tolfenamate analogs, may have had a substantial positive effect on the biological activity of the complexes, e.g., they could improve the intercalation ability of the complexes into DNA. In particular, the same substituents on the benzene ring in flufenamate and niflumate (trifluoromethyl susbtituent) or tolfenamate and clonixinate (chloro and methyl susbtituent) ligands provide the additional possibility for correlating the observed biological activities of the prepared complexes (Scheme 1).

In this regard complexes **1–5** were studied via various spectroscopic methods both in a solid state and in a DMSO solution, including IR, UV-Vis and EPR spectroscopy, as well as X-ray analysis. The redox properties of the complexes were studied via cyclic voltammetry. The SOD mimetic activity of all five complexes was determined with an indirect NBT assay. In order to compare the structure and biological activity of the complexes containing 2-anilinobenzoate and 2-phenylaminonicotinate ligands, the interaction of complexes **1–4** with calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) was studied using absorption titrations, viscosity measurements and the ethidium bromide displacement fluorescence method. The interaction of these complexes with bovine serum albumin was investigated as well. Finally, the anticancer activity of complexes **1–4** was tested against several different cancer cell lines.

### **2. Results and Discussion**

### *2.1. Synthesis*

The complexes under study were obtained in moderate yields (57–75%) using a complexation reaction between corresponding fenamic acid and NaOH with copper acetate dihydrate and *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide (in a molar ratio of 2:2:1:2) in ethanol/methanol, according to Scheme 2. All five complexes are stable in the air, and their compositions were characterized with elemental analysis and IR spectroscopy, as well as with X-ray diffraction. The elemental analysis of the complexes is in agreement with the calculated values for the corresponding formulae: [Cu(fluf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**1**), [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**)**,** [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**), [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) and [Cu(mef)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**5**). The exact crystal structures and compositions of the complexes were fully confirmed via singlecrystal X-ray crystallography. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 31

**Scheme 2.** Schematic representation of the syntheses of **1–5**. **Scheme 2.** Schematic representation of the syntheses of **1–5**.

*2.2. IR and UV-Vis Spectroscopy* 

The infrared spectra of complexes **1–5** were recorded in the region of 4000–400 cm−<sup>1</sup> in a solid state with the ATR technique, and a tentative description of some important bands was performed (Table 1) on the basis of literature data [34]. The spectra of all five

and **2, 4**). The IR spectra of **1**, **3** and **5** showed broad absorption bands of medium intensity (3507, 3458 and 3473 cm−1 and 3324, 3217 and 3206, respectively) corresponding to the OH stretching vibrations (antisymmetric and symmetric, respectively) of coordinated water molecules, which were missing in the IR spectra of **2** and **4** (Supplementary Figure S1b), in accordance with the complex compositions. In addition, the IR spectra of all complexes in the region of 3200–3100 cm−1 exhibited a series of weak absorptions assigned to N-H vibrations, as well as a series of weak absorption peaks corresponding to CH stretches (between 3100 and 2800 cm−1). Each IR spectra also contained a strong amidic band ῦ(C=O)

1592 cm−1

1592 cm−1

1592 cm−1

ῦs(COO–

cm−1

ῦs(COO–

cm−1

ῦs(COO–

cm−1

3324w

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

5

3458m,br

3473m,br

2 -

4 -

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

3

5

1606s <sup>c</sup>

5

1595s <sup>c</sup> 1582s <sup>c</sup>

1602s <sup>c</sup> 1585vs <sup>c</sup>

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

1387s 1368s

1380s 1358vs

3206m,br 1613vs <sup>c</sup> 1377vs <sup>236</sup> 1613s <sup>c</sup>

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup>

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

227/208

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

1

3

5

244/222

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

214/195 1629s 1595s <sup>c</sup>

2 -

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

4 -

with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

### *2.2. IR and UV-Vis Spectroscopy*

The infrared spectra of complexes **1–5** were recorded in the region of 4000–400 cm−<sup>1</sup> in a solid state with the ATR technique, and a tentative description of some important bands was performed (Table 1) on the basis of literature data [34]. The spectra of all five complexes are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. According to the composition and spectral features, we can divide the studied complexes into two distinctive groups (**1**, **3**, **5** and **2, 4**). The IR spectra of **1**, **3** and **5** showed broad absorption bands of medium intensity (3507, 3458 and 3473 cm−<sup>1</sup> and 3324, 3217 and 3206, respectively) corresponding to the OH stretching vibrations (antisymmetric and symmetric, respectively) of coordinated water molecules, which were missing in the IR spectra of **2** and **4** (Supplementary Figure S1b), in accordance with the complex compositions. In addition, the IR spectra of all complexes in the region of 3200–3100 cm−<sup>1</sup> exhibited a series of weak absorptions assigned to N-H vibrations, as well as a series of weak absorption peaks corresponding to CH stretches (between 3100 and 2800 cm−<sup>1</sup> ). Each IR spectra also contained a strong amidic band *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Complex** *ῦ*(**O‒H**) *ῦ***as**(**COO–** ) *ῦ***s**(**COO–** ) *Δ ῦ*(**C=O**) *ῦ*(**C=N**) **λ**(**d-d**) (C=O) at 1629 cm−<sup>1</sup> for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−<sup>1</sup> for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ) ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. as(COO−) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−<sup>1</sup> ; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−<sup>1</sup> . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581–1557 cm−<sup>1</sup> in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602–1582 cm−<sup>1</sup> for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ ( *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 as(COO−)- *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **<sup>3</sup>** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )- )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate <sup>s</sup>(COO−)) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (∆ = 190 cm−<sup>1</sup> ), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ ( *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of as(COO−)- *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of <sup>s</sup>(COO−)) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−<sup>1</sup> , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−<sup>1</sup> , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )- )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )- )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **<sup>2</sup>** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ) ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 , which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. **<sup>s</sup>(COO**−**) <sup>∆</sup>***Inorganics* **2023**, *<sup>11</sup>*, x FOR PEER REVIEW <sup>6</sup> of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2**and **4,**parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31 at 1629 cm−1 for **2** and **4** and at 1619, 1613 and 1612 cm−1 for **1**, **3** and **5**. In the latter case, this band can be considered as a combined mixed band, caused by the vibration of the amidic C=O group and asymmetric ῦas(COO– ) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena ligands, the band attributed to amidic C=O stretches could be found at 1630 cm−1; thus, the coordination of the ligands resulted in the lowering of the band wavenumber only in the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**. C=N ring stretching vibrations in dena ligands appeared at 1592 cm−1 . After complex formations, this vibration moved to a lower wavenumber, with double sharp bands at 1581‒1557 cm−1 in the cases of **1**, **3** and **5** and at 1602‒1582 cm−1 for **2** and **4**. Symmetric and antisymmetric carboxylate stretching vibrations could serve as an indication of a type of coordination mode for the carboxylate group in the prepared complexes. According to the literature [34], if the values of parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– ῦs(COO– )) are higher than those in ionic complexes, such as in sodium mefenamate (Δ = 190 cm−1), the coordination mode of the carboxylate group is monodentate. In the cases of complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group were split, which could be attributed to the observed different *r*(Cu-O) bond length in the asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group (Table 1). Moreover, bands belonging to the asymmetric stretching vibration were again found in the spectrum in the form of combined mixed bands caused by the coupled vibration of C=N and the carboxylate group based on their strong intensity.

3057m

1619s <sup>c</sup> 1606s <sup>c</sup>

)-ῦs(COO–

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

1582s <sup>c</sup>

<sup>228</sup> 1619s <sup>c</sup>

1378vs <sup>241</sup>

1602s <sup>c</sup> 1585vs <sup>c</sup>

227/208

244/222

with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

214/195 1629s 1595s <sup>c</sup>

227/205 1629s 1602s <sup>c</sup>

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

) based on its strong intensity. In parent dena

)) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1

)-

,

)) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1

)-ῦs(COO–

1378vs <sup>241</sup>

<sup>228</sup> 1619s <sup>c</sup>

,

)-

1561s 600br 801br

)) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1

214/195 1629s 1595s <sup>c</sup>

1568s 646br 795br

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

539br 615sh

227/205 1629s 1602s <sup>c</sup>

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

1561s 600br 801br

612sh 794br

529br

1557s 628br 789br

shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

791br

227/208

1581s

1568s 646br 795br

539br 615sh

1557s 628br 789br

529br

1561s 600br 801br

244/222

1582s <sup>c</sup>

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

1579s

612sh 794br

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

1585s <sup>c</sup>

1575s

1368s

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

1380s 1358vs

214/195 1629s 1595s <sup>c</sup>

3206m,br 1613vs <sup>c</sup> 1377vs <sup>236</sup> 1613s <sup>c</sup>

1581s

<sup>228</sup> 1619s <sup>c</sup>

1582s <sup>c</sup>

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are

1579s

1585s <sup>c</sup>

1575s

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup>

227/205 1629s 1602s <sup>c</sup>

1581s

,

)) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1

)-

1582s <sup>c</sup>

1579s

791br

1585s <sup>c</sup>

1575s

)-

,

**<sup>a</sup> λ**(**d-d**)

)-

)-

,

,

1568s 646br 795br

539br 615sh

1561s 600br 801br

1557s 628br 789br

529br

1561s 600br 801br

612sh 794br

791br

**b**

1 3324w **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. cm−1 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the carboxylate group. Both bands belonging to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching group. In the case of complexes **2** and **4,** parameter ∆ showed values between 244 and 195 , in agreement with the observed asymmetric bidentate chelating binding mode of the complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– )-ῦs(COO– )) fell in the range of 241–228 cm−1 which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate complexes **1**, **3** and **5**, parameter ∆ (ῦas(COO– which is in a full accordance with the monodentate coordination mode of the carboxylate **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−<sup>1</sup> ) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**. **Table 1.** Infrared (in cm−1) and electronic (in nm) data of complexes **1–5**.


as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are <sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution; <sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;. 2 - 1595s <sup>c</sup> 1387s <sup>228</sup> 1619s <sup>c</sup> 1568s 646br 795br 539br **Complex** *ῦ*(**O‒H**) *ῦ***as**(**COO–** ) *ῦ***s**(**COO–** ) *Δ ῦ*(**C=O**) *ῦ*(**C=N**) **λ**(**d-d**) 1619s <sup>c</sup> **Complex** *ῦ*(**O‒H**) *ῦ***as**(**COO–** ) *ῦ***s**(**COO–** ) *Δ ῦ*(**C=O**) *ῦ*(**C=N**) **λ**(**d-d**) 3057m 3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s<sup>c</sup> 1561s 600br 801br 3217m,br 1612vs<sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup> 1561s 600br 801br 5 3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup> 1561s 600br 801br 5 3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup> <sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution; 5 3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup> <sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution; <sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad.

615sh

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

1606s <sup>c</sup>

3324w

1595s <sup>c</sup> 1582s <sup>c</sup>

1602s <sup>c</sup> 1585vs <sup>c</sup>

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

1557s 628br 789br

529br

3458m,br

1561s 600br 801br

3473m,br

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are

3

791br

1619s <sup>c</sup> 1606s <sup>c</sup>

1387s 1368s

1595s <sup>c</sup> 1582s <sup>c</sup>

5

3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup>

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

1380s 1358vs

1602s <sup>c</sup> 1585vs <sup>c</sup>

4 -

1378vs <sup>241</sup>

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

3458m,br

227/208

1387s 1368s

3473m,br

3206m,br 1613vs <sup>c</sup> 1377vs <sup>236</sup> 1613s <sup>c</sup>

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

244/222

3217m,br 1612vs <sup>c</sup> 1376vs <sup>236</sup> 1612s <sup>c</sup>

1380s 1358vs

with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

612sh 794br

1575s

with the maximum in the range of 587‒648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in

1582s <sup>c</sup>

<sup>c</sup> mixed bands; vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad;.

3057m 3324w

1

3473m,br

5

1579s

2 -

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are

4 -

<sup>a</sup> nujol; <sup>b</sup> DMSO solution;

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

The electronic spectra of **1–5** were obtained in the solid state as nujol mulls, as well as in DMSO solutions. Representative examples of such spectra for complexes **4** and **5** are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The solid-state spectra of the studied complexes showed very broad formally forbidden low-intensity d-d transitions in the visible region, with the maximum in the range of 587–648 nm, corresponding to the tetragonal bipyramidal stereochemistry around the metal center. In **2** and **4**, a shoulder at approximately 612–615 nm was observed (Table 1). In addition, the spectra also contained bands at approximately 200–400 nm, which could be considered as an intraligand transition, as well as a ligand-to-metal-charge transfer between the π electron cloud of the fenamate moiety and a central copper atom [18]. Upon dissolution in the DMSO solvent, the absorption maximum of broad *d*-*d* transitions shifted to higher wavelengths at a relatively constant range of 789–801 nm, which is expected for mononuclear copper complexes with distorted square planar geometry (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 1) [35]. This shift likely indicates the potential coordination of DMSO solvent molecules in the primary coordination sphere of the complexes.

### *2.3. Molecular and Crystal Structures*

The crystal structures of all five complexes were refined with a more accurate aspherical HAR method using data measured with high redundancy at 100 K. The crystal structures of four of the complexes, **1–3** and **5**, have been previously determined at room temperature using the standard IAM model, but the published crystal structures do not contain disordered groups and/or atomic coordinates in the CSD database [30–33]. On the other hand, complex **4** is newly synthesized, so its crystal structure is completely new. Complex **1** and the isostructural complexes **3** and **5** crystallize in a monoclinic system with the *P*21/c (**1**) or *P*21/n (**3**,**5**) space group, whereas complex **2** and the newly prepared complex **4** crystallize in the triclinic system with a *P*-1 space group. The molecular structures of all five complexes are shown in Figure 1, whereby the copper atoms in each case lie in a special position at the center of the symmetry. The selected bond distances of all complexes are listed in Table 2. The coordination polyhedron around the copper atom in complex **1**, as well as in isostructural complexes **3** and **5**, is in the shape of a tetragonal bipyramid. The equatorial plane is formed by a pair of oxygen atoms of monodentately bound carboxyl groups of flufenamate (**1**), tolfenamate (**3**) or mefenamate (**5**) anions (Cu1–O1 distances are in the range of 1.946–1.973 Å), and by two pyridine nitrogen atoms of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide ligands (Cu1–N1 distances are in the range of 2.015–2.036 Å) in the *trans* positions. The two axial positions of the tetragonal bipyramid are complemented by two coordinated water molecules (Cu1–O1W distances are in the range of 2.435–2.488 Å). The molecular structures of complexes **1**, **3** and **5** are stabilized by intramolecular O–H···O hydrogen bonds between coordinated water molecules (O1W) and uncoordinated oxygen atoms of carboxyl groups (O2) (O1W–H1WA···O2; distances O1W···O2 are in the range of 2.728–2.738 Å; Supplementary Table S1). Fenamate (flufenamate, tolfenamate or mefenamate) anions also form intramolecular N–H···O bonds between amine nitrogen atoms (N3) and uncoordinated oxygen atoms of carboxyl groups (O2) (N3–H3···O2; distances N3···O2 are in the range of 2.631–2.658 Å). The complex molecules of **1**, **3** and **5** are connected into 1D supramolecular chains by means of intermolecular O–H···O hydrogen bonds between coordinated water molecules (O1W) and amide oxygen atoms of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide ligands of neighboring complex molecules (O1W–H1WB···O3; distances O1W···O3 are in the range of 2.799–2.853 Å; Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S8).

The crystal structures of complexes **2** and **4** are very similar and can be considered isostructural based on their similar cell parameters, same space group and similar molecular and intermolecular interactions. The coordination polyhedron around the copper atom in complexes **2** and **4** has the shape of a tetragonal bipyramid and is formed by two pairs of asymmetrically bonded oxygen atoms (O1,O2) of carboxyl groups of niflumate (**2**) or clonixinate (**4**) anions and by a pair of pyridine nitrogen atoms (N1) of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide

ligands in the *trans* configuration. In both cases, the equatorial plane is equally formed by a pair of oxygen atoms (O1) (Cu1–O1; distances are 1.9502(6) and 1.9296(9) Å, respectively) and a pair of nitrogen atoms (N1) (Cu1–N1; distances are 2.0086(7) and 2.0170(12) Å, respectively). However, a significant difference can be observed in the distances between the two axially bonded oxygen atoms (O2). The Cu1–O2 distances are equal to 2.6467(11) Å in the case of complex **2**, but in the case of complex **4**, they are significantly extended to a value of 2.9554(10) Å. A similar trend was reported for several copper(II) carboxylate complexes with this type of coordination, where Cu–Oax varied in the range of 2.45–2.98 Å [36]. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 31

(**1**)

**Figure 1.** Molecular structures of [Cu(fluf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**1**), [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**), **Figure 1.** Molecular structures of [Cu(fluf)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**1**), [Cu(nifl)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> ] (**2**), [Cu(tolf)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**3**), [Cu(clon)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> ] (**4**) and [Cu(mef)<sup>2</sup> (dena)<sup>2</sup> (H2O)<sup>2</sup> ] (**5**).

The aromatic pyridine (C12–C13–N4–C15–C16–C17) and benzene (C18–C19–C20– C21–C22–C23) rings of the niflumate (**2**) or clonixinate (**4**) anions are coplanar, which is

the benzene ring (C23) and the nitrogen atoms of the pyridine ring (N4) (C23–H23∙∙∙N4;

[Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**), [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) and [Cu(mef)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**5**).


**Table 2.** Selected bond lengths (Å) for compounds (**1–5**).

Symmetry codes for a symmetrical part of a complex molecule: (i) 1–*x*, 1–*y*, 2–*z*; (ii) 1–*x*, 1–*y*, 1–*z*; (iii) 2–*x*, 1–*y*, 1–*z*; (iv)–*x*, 1–*y*, 1–*z*.

The aromatic pyridine (C12–C13–N4–C15–C16–C17) and benzene (C18–C19–C20– C21–C22–C23) rings of the niflumate (**2**) or clonixinate (**4**) anions are coplanar, which is also supported by intramolecular C–H···N hydrogen bonds between the carbon atoms of the benzene ring (C23) and the nitrogen atoms of the pyridine ring (N4) (C23–H23···N4; distances of C23···N4 are 2.913(1) and 2.899(2) Å, respectively; Supplementary Table S1). In addition, stabilization of the molecular structure can also be observed due to the intramolecular N–H···O bonds between amine nitrogen atoms (N3) and carboxylate oxygen atoms (O2) (N3–H3···O2; distances of N3···O2 are 2.669(1) and 2.673(2) Å, respectively). Coplanar pyridine and benzene rings of niflumate (**2**) or clonixinate (**4**) ligands are stacked with the neighboring complex molecules, resulting in the formation of π–π stacking interactions (Supplementary Figure S9) [37]. The angle between the plane of the pyridine ring and the plane of the benzene ring is 8.60◦ and 2.42◦ , respectively. The centroid– centroid distances are 3.72 and 3.60 Å, respectively, and the shift distances are 1.12 and 1.28 Å, respectively. Additionally, stacked complex molecules are also linked by means of C–H···O hydrogen bonds between the aromatic carbon atom (C21) and the carboxamide oxygen atom (O3) of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide ligands of neighboring complex molecules (C21–H21···O3; distances of C21···O3 for both cases are identically equal to 3.4356(18) Å) in the 1D supramolecular chains. In the crystal structures of both complexes, other C–H···O hydrogen bonds can also be observed between the carbon atoms (C3, C4) of pyridine rings of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide ligands and the oxygen atoms (O3) of *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide ligands of neighboring complex molecules (C3–H3A···O3 and C4–H4···O3; distances of C···O are in the range of 3.200–3.479 Å).

### *2.4. Hirshfeld Surface Analyses*

Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to further study the intermolecular interactions of the crystal structures of all five compounds. For the illustrations, Figures 2 and 3 show the 3D Hirshfeld surfaces of **1** and **4**. The 3D Hirshfeld surfaces of other complexes are illustrated in the Supplementary Materials (Supplementary Figures S10–S12). The 3D Hirshfeld surfaces were mapped over the *d*norm shape index (Figures 2 and 3, Supplementary Figures S10–S12). The surfaces are shown as transparent to allow for the visualization of the molecular moiety around which they were calculated. As shown in Supplementary Figures S10–S12, the deep red spots on the *d*norm Hirshfeld surfaces indicate close-contact interactions, which were mainly responsible for the significant intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. The 3D Hirshfeld surface illustration of **1** (Figure 2), as well as of **3** (Supplementary Figure S10) and **5** (Supplementary Figure S11), shows deep red spots representing O–H···O hydrogen bonds. The 3D Hirshfeld surface illustration of **4** (Figure 3), as well as of **2** (Supplementary Figure S12), shows only the deep red spots that represent weak C–H···O hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surfaces plotted over the shape index of **4** and **2** visualize the π–π stacking interactions by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure S12). The Hirshfeld 2D fingerprint of all complexes are illustrated in the Supplementary Materials (Supplementary Figures S13–S19). In the cases of **3** and **5**, which were strongly disordered, the structures are

shown separately for the main and minor part of the disorders. Hirshfeld 2D fingerprint plots allow for the quick and easy identification of significant intermolecular interactions mapped on the molecular surface [38,39]. As shown in Supplementary Figures S13–S19, strong and medium H···O/O···H hydrogen bonding interactions covered 10.3–12.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces with two distinct spikes in the 2D fingerprint plots, indicating the fact that hydrogen bonding interactions were the most significant interactions in the crystal structures. In the middle of the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots, H···H interactions covered 35.0–64.0% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces; however, H···H interactions were not very strong in the crystal structures. In particular, H···C/C···H interactions covered 16.5–23.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces in the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots. In the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots of **1–2**, H···F/F···H interactions covered 9.8–19.6% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces, and H···Cl/Cl···H interactions covered 9.4–21.1% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces for **3–4**. Furthermore, in the 2D fingerplots of **2** and **4**, significant C···C interactions are visible, covering 4.2–4.9% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces as a result of the presence of significant π–π stacking interactions in the crystal structures. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 31 Supplementary Figures S13–S19, strong and medium H∙∙∙O/O∙∙∙H hydrogen bonding interactions covered 10.3–12.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces with two distinct spikes in the 2D fingerprint plots, indicating the fact that hydrogen bonding interactions were the most significant interactions in the crystal structures. In the middle of the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots, H∙∙∙H interactions covered 35.0–64.0% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces; however, H∙∙∙H interactions were not very strong in the crystal structures. In particular, H∙∙∙C/C∙∙∙H interactions covered 16.5–23.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces in the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots. In the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots of **1–2**, H∙∙∙F/F∙∙∙H interactions covered 9.8–19.6% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces, and H∙∙∙Cl/Cl∙∙∙H interactions covered 9.4–21.1% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces for **3–4**. Furthermore, in the 2D fingerplots of **2** and **4**, significant C∙∙∙C interactions are visible, covering 4.2–4.9% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces as a result of the presence of significant π‒π stacking interactions in the crystal structures. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 31 Supplementary Figures S13–S19, strong and medium H∙∙∙O/O∙∙∙H hydrogen bonding interactions covered 10.3–12.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces with two distinct spikes in the 2D fingerprint plots, indicating the fact that hydrogen bonding interactions were the most significant interactions in the crystal structures. In the middle of the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots, H∙∙∙H interactions covered 35.0–64.0% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces; however, H∙∙∙H interactions were not very strong in the crystal structures. In particular, H∙∙∙C/C∙∙∙H interactions covered 16.5–23.7% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces in the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots. In the scattered points in the 2D fingerplots of **1–2**, H∙∙∙F/F∙∙∙H interactions covered 9.8–19.6% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces, and H∙∙∙Cl/Cl∙∙∙H interactions covered 9.4–21.1% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces for **3–4**. Furthermore, in the 2D fingerplots of **2** and **4**, significant C∙∙∙C interactions are visible, covering 4.2–4.9% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces as a result of the presence of significant π‒π stacking interactions in the crystal structures.

**Figure 2.** View of 3D Hirshfeld surface of **1** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.5608 to 1.3607 a.u. **Figure 2.** View of 3D Hirshfeld surface of **1** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.5608 to 1.3607 a.u. **Figure 2.** View of 3D Hirshfeld surface of **1** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.5608 to 1.3607 a.u.

a.u. (top) and shape index (bottom). **Figure 3.** View of the 3D Hirshfeld surface of **4** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.2000 to 1.4950 a.u. (top) and shape index (bottom). **Figure 3.** View of the 3D Hirshfeld surface of **4** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.2000 to 1.4950 a.u. (top) and shape index (bottom).

**Figure 3.** View of the 3D Hirshfeld surface of **4** plotted over *d*norm in the range of −0.2000 to 1.4950

*2.5. EPR Spectroscopy* 

*2.5. EPR Spectroscopy* 

### *2.5. EPR Spectroscopy*

The complexes under study were investigated either as polycrystalline solids at room temperature or as frozen DMSO solutions at a low temperature (100 K). Experimental spectra were simulated using computer software in order to obtain parameters with a higher precision. The X-band EPR solid spectra of the selected complexes, **1**, **3** and **4**, are shown in Figure 4. The obtained spin Hamiltonian parameters are collected in Table 3. The EPR spectra of solid samples showed features characteristic for copper(II) monomeric complexes with S = <sup>1</sup> 2 . The EPR signal was of an axial symmetry with either resolved (**3** and **4** only weakly visible) or unresolved hyperfine structures (**1**, **2** and **5**) in a parallel part of the signal as a result of the interaction of the unpaired electron with copper nuclear spin (I = 3/2) (Figure 4). The relative ordering of the axial g factors followed the usual trend (*g*<sup>k</sup> <sup>&</sup>gt; *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> <sup>~</sup> *<sup>g</sup>*e), indicating a *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>x</sup> 2 -y <sup>2</sup> ground state, which is characteristic for copper(II) atoms in tetragonally elongated octahedral arrangements around the central ion when the Jahn– Teller effect is operating. Similarly, values of the obtained *g* factors (*g*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.055–2.082 and *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.29–2.36) showed only minor differences among the complexes and are in agreement with the information extracted from the crystal structures as well as from the literature for structurally similar complexes [18,27,29]. The complexes under study were investigated either as polycrystalline solids at room temperature or as frozen DMSO solutions at a low temperature (100 K). Experimental spectra were simulated using computer software in order to obtain parameters with a higher precision. The X-band EPR solid spectra of the selected complexes, **1**, **3** and **4**, are shown in Figure 4. The obtained spin Hamiltonian parameters are collected in Table 3. The EPR spectra of solid samples showed features characteristic for copper(II) monomeric complexes with S = ½. The EPR signal was of an axial symmetry with either resolved (**3** and **4** only weakly visible) or unresolved hyperfine structures (**1**, **2** and **5**) in a parallel part of the signal as a result of the interaction of the unpaired electron with copper nuclear spin (I = 3/2) (Figure 4). The relative ordering of the axial g factors followed the usual trend (*g*‖ > *g*⊥ ~ *g*e), indicating a *d*x2-y2 ground state, which is characteristic for copper(II) atoms in tetragonally elongated octahedral arrangements around the central ion when the Jahn– Teller effect is operating. Similarly, values of the obtained *g* factors (*g*⊥ = 2.055–2.082 and *g*‖ = 2.29–2.36) showed only minor differences among the complexes and are in agreement with the information extracted from the crystal structures as well as from the literature for structurally similar complexes [18,27,29].

*Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 31

**Figure 4.** Room temperature solid-state spectra of **1**, **3** and **4**. Simulated spin Hamiltonian parameters are *g*⊥ = 2.082, *g*‖ = 2.290 and ∆*B* = (1.2, 8.5) mT (**1**); *g*⊥ = 2.063, *g*|| = 2.305, *A*‖ = 16.2 mT and ∆*B* = 4 mT (**3**); and *g*⊥ = 2.055, *g*‖ = 2.308, *A*‖ = 16 mT and ∆*B* = (1.3, 8) mT (**4**). **Figure 4.** Room temperature solid-state spectra of **1**, **3** and **4**. Simulated spin Hamiltonian parameters are *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.082, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.290 and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = (1.2, 8.5) mT (**1**); *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.063, *<sup>g</sup>*|| = 2.305, *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 16.2 mT and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = 4 mT (**3**); and *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.055, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.308, *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 16 mT and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = (1.3, 8) mT (**4**).



parameters are *g*⊥ = 2.078, *g*‖ = 2.312, *A*|| = 14.5 mT and ∆*B* = 3.5 mT; *g*⊥ = 2.073, *g*‖ = 2.315, *A*‖ = 15.5 Defined as *<sup>g</sup>*av = (2*g*<sup>⊥</sup> <sup>+</sup> *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> )/3, *<sup>G</sup>* = (*g*<sup>k</sup> − 2)/(*g*<sup>⊥</sup> − 2) and *<sup>f</sup>* <sup>=</sup> *<sup>g</sup>*k/*A*<sup>k</sup> .

For all five complexes, the EPR spectra of frozen DMSO solutions showed axial symmetry with resolved parallel hyperfine splitting showing a tree of four peaks. The spin Hamiltonian parameters obtained from the EPR simulations are collected in Table 3. The obtained EPR data show a close resemblance (*g*⊥ = 2.072–2.078, *g*‖ = 2.300–2.315, *A*‖ = 14.5– 17.5 mT) as a result of the similar structures of complexes in DMSO solutions. This fact can be clearly seen when looking at the alike values of the derived EPR parameters, such The EPR spectra of frozen solutions are usually more informative than their analogs in a solid state due to the dilution and separation of paramagnetic ions between the neighboring molecules as a result of solvation. Because the biological measurements on the complexes were performed in the liquid phase, it was reasonable to have the solution EPR spectra to obtain more appropriate structural information for correlating the experimental results. The EPR spectra of DMSO solutions measured at 100 K are depicted in Figure 5 (for selected complexes **1**, **4** and **5**).

mT and ∆*B* = (2.8, 3.5) mT; and *g*⊥ = 2.075, *g*‖ = 2.300, *A*‖ = 16.5 mT and ∆*B* = 3 mT.

in Figure 5 (for selected complexes **1**, **4** and **5**).

**200 250 300 350 400** B / mT

and ∆*B* = 4 mT (**3**); and *g*⊥ = 2.055, *g*‖ = 2.308, *A*‖ = 16 mT and ∆*B* = (1.3, 8) mT (**4**).

 exp sim

**Figure 4.** Room temperature solid-state spectra of **1**, **3** and **4**. Simulated spin Hamiltonian parameters are *g*⊥ = 2.082, *g*‖ = 2.290 and ∆*B* = (1.2, 8.5) mT (**1**); *g*⊥ = 2.063, *g*|| = 2.305, *A*‖ = 16.2 mT

The EPR spectra of frozen solutions are usually more informative than their analogs in a solid state due to the dilution and separation of paramagnetic ions between the neighboring molecules as a result of solvation. Because the biological measurements on the complexes were performed in the liquid phase, it was reasonable to have the solution EPR spectra to obtain more appropriate structural information for correlating the experimental results. The EPR spectra of DMSO solutions measured at 100 K are depicted

**240 270 300 330 360 390 420** B / mT

 exp sim

structurally similar complexes [18,27,29].

 exp sim

The complexes under study were investigated either as polycrystalline solids at room temperature or as frozen DMSO solutions at a low temperature (100 K). Experimental spectra were simulated using computer software in order to obtain parameters with a higher precision. The X-band EPR solid spectra of the selected complexes, **1**, **3** and **4**, are shown in Figure 4. The obtained spin Hamiltonian parameters are collected in Table 3. The EPR spectra of solid samples showed features characteristic for copper(II) monomeric complexes with S = ½. The EPR signal was of an axial symmetry with either resolved (**3** and **4** only weakly visible) or unresolved hyperfine structures (**1**, **2** and **5**) in a parallel part of the signal as a result of the interaction of the unpaired electron with copper nuclear spin (I = 3/2) (Figure 4). The relative ordering of the axial g factors followed the usual trend (*g*‖ > *g*⊥ ~ *g*e), indicating a *d*x2-y2 ground state, which is characteristic for copper(II) atoms in tetragonally elongated octahedral arrangements around the central ion when the Jahn– Teller effect is operating. Similarly, values of the obtained *g* factors (*g*⊥ = 2.055–2.082 and *g*‖ = 2.29–2.36) showed only minor differences among the complexes and are in agreement with the information extracted from the crystal structures as well as from the literature for

**Figure 5.** EPR spectra of **1**, **4** and **5** measured in DMSO solutions at 77K. Simulated spin Hamiltonian parameters are *g*⊥ = 2.078, *g*‖ = 2.312, *A*|| = 14.5 mT and ∆*B* = 3.5 mT; *g*⊥ = 2.073, *g*‖ = 2.315, *A*‖ = 15.5 mT and ∆*B* = (2.8, 3.5) mT; and *g*⊥ = 2.075, *g*‖ = 2.300, *A*‖ = 16.5 mT and ∆*B* = 3 mT. **Figure 5.** EPR spectra of **1**, **4** and **5** measured in DMSO solutions at 77K. Simulated spin Hamiltonian parameters are *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.078, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.312, *<sup>A</sup>*|| = 14.5 mT and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = 3.5 mT; *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.073, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.315, *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 15.5 mT and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = (2.8, 3.5) mT; and *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.075, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.300, *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 16.5 mT and <sup>∆</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* = 3 mT. studied complexes. Such values indicate that only minor tetrahedral distortion around the central copper ion existed in the primary coordination sphere, in accordance with the crystallographic information [40]. We can conclude that the observed similarity among the solid and solution EPR data suggest a close similarity in the geometries of the studied

For all five complexes, the EPR spectra of frozen DMSO solutions showed axial symmetry with resolved parallel hyperfine splitting showing a tree of four peaks. The spin Hamiltonian parameters obtained from the EPR simulations are collected in Table 3. The obtained EPR data show a close resemblance (*g*⊥ = 2.072–2.078, *g*‖ = 2.300–2.315, *A*‖ = 14.5– 17.5 mT) as a result of the similar structures of complexes in DMSO solutions. This fact can be clearly seen when looking at the alike values of the derived EPR parameters, such For all five complexes, the EPR spectra of frozen DMSO solutions showed axial symmetry with resolved parallel hyperfine splitting showing a tree of four peaks. The spin Hamiltonian parameters obtained from the EPR simulations are collected in Table 3. The obtained EPR data show a close resemblance (*g*<sup>⊥</sup> = 2.072–2.078, *<sup>g</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 2.300–2.315, *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>k</sup> = 14.5–17.5 mT) as a result of the similar structures of complexes in DMSO solutions. This fact can be clearly seen when looking at the alike values of the derived EPR parameters, such as *<sup>g</sup>*ave, *<sup>G</sup>* or *<sup>g</sup>*k/*A*<sup>k</sup> , are also summarized in Table 3. The values of the geometric parameters *G* were very close to 4.00, indicating that the complexes exhibit minimal exchange interactions between copper(II) centers [35]. Similarly, values of the parameter of the tetrahedral distortion *<sup>f</sup>* <sup>=</sup> *<sup>g</sup>*k/*A*<sup>k</sup> ranged from 123 cm for **2** to 147 cm for **1** between the studied complexes. Such values indicate that only minor tetrahedral distortion around the central copper ion existed in the primary coordination sphere, in accordance with the crystallographic information [40]. We can conclude that the observed similarity among the solid and solution EPR data suggest a close similarity in the geometries of the studied complexes. **Table 3.** EPR spectral parameters of powders measured at RT and frozen DMSO solutions measured at 100 K. **Complex Temperature** *g*<sup>⊥</sup> *g***‖** *g***ave** *A***Cu‖ /mT** *G f***/cm**  <sup>1</sup>Solid RT 2.082 2.290 2.151 - 3.54 Sol. 100K 2.078 2.312 2.156 14.5 4.00 147 <sup>2</sup>Solid RT 2.061 2.360 2.161 - 5.90 Sol. 100 K 2.077 2.303 2.152 17.5 3.94 123 <sup>3</sup>Solid RT 2.063 2.305 2.144 16.2 4.84 132 Sol. 100 K 2.072 2.307 2.150 16.7 4.26 128 <sup>4</sup>Solid RT 2.057 2.308 2.140 16 5.40 134 Sol. 100 K 2.073 2.315 2.154 15.5 4.32 138 <sup>5</sup>Solid RT 2.055 2.320 2.143 - 5.81 Sol. 100 K 2.075 2.300 2.150 16.5 4.00 130 Defined as *g*av = (2*g*⊥ + *g*‖)/3, *G* = (*g*‖ − 2)/(*g*<sup>⊥</sup> − 2) and *f* = *g*‖/*A*‖.

### *2.6. SOD Mimetic Activity*

**200 250 300 350 400**

**B / mT**

complexes.

The SOD mimetic activity of the studied complexes was characterized via an NBT assay. The superoxide radical was generated with xanthine and a xanthine oxidase biochemical system, and the ability of the complexes to scavenge the superoxide was tested indirectly via the reduction of NBT dye. Colour changes in NBT were detected at 560 nm. When the potential scavenging complex was added to the system, a competing reaction between the complex and superoxide would occur, which led to the inhibition of the reaction between NBT and the superoxide. The scavenging activity of the studied complexes was evaluated and characterized with the *IC*<sup>50</sup> value (Figure 6). *2.6. SOD Mimetic Activity*  The SOD mimetic activity of the studied complexes was characterized via an NBT assay. The superoxide radical was generated with xanthine and a xanthine oxidase biochemical system, and the ability of the complexes to scavenge the superoxide was tested indirectly via the reduction of NBT dye. Colour changes in NBT were detected at 560 nm. When the potential scavenging complex was added to the system, a competing reaction between the complex and superoxide would occur, which led to the inhibition of the reaction between NBT and the superoxide. The scavenging activity of the studied complexes was evaluated and characterized with the *IC*50 value (Figure 6).

**Figure 6.** SOD mimetic activity of **2**, **3** and **4**. **Figure 6.** SOD mimetic activity of **2**, **3** and **4**.

The inhibition concentration *IC*50 corresponds to the concentration of the complex that caused 50% inhibition of the NBT reduction. The results are collected in Table 4. The complexes showed significant SOD-like activity, comparable to the SOD mimetic activity of other copper fenamates [3,27,41,42]. Complexes **2** and **4** exhibited the greatest radical The inhibition concentration *IC*<sup>50</sup> corresponds to the concentration of the complex that caused 50% inhibition of the NBT reduction. The results are collected in Table 4. The complexes showed significant SOD-like activity, comparable to the SOD mimetic activity of other copper fenamates [3,27,41,42]. Complexes **2** and **4** exhibited the greatest radical scavenging effect with micromolar concentrations. On the basis of these results, the complexes could be considered as the good SOD mimetics [3].


**Table 4.** SOD mimetic activity of selected copper NSAIDs.

### *2.7. Interactions of Complexes with KO<sup>2</sup> in the Presence of Neocuproine*

The first step in the mechanism of action of native CuZn-SOD enzymes is the binding of the superoxide radical anion to the copper center, where Cu(II) is subsequently reduced to Cu(I) and the oxygen molecule is released [43]. Therefore, the ability of the prepared complexes to undergo reduction with the superoxide radical anion is an important step in the investigation of their potential SOD activity. To verify this assumption, we used a specific Cu(I) chelator, neocuproine, which forms a stable Cu(I)-neocuproine complex that absorbs at 458 nm [44]. The addition of potassium superoxide (KO2) to the solutions of complexes **1–4** in the presence of neocuproine resulted in a dramatic increase in absorbance at 458 nm for complexes **1–4** and a visible reduction in the d-d band intensity of the studied complexes, as can be clearly seen in Figure 7. Thus, from these results we can assume that the prepared complexes **1–4** undergo reduction to Cu(I) under the influence of KO<sup>2</sup> and thus fulfill an important prerequisite to be good SOD mimetics. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 31

**Figure 7.** Time-dependent UV-Vis spectra of the interaction of studied complexes and KO2 in DMSO in the presence of neocuproine: (**a**) **1**; (**b**) **2**; (**c**) **3**; (**d**) **4. Figure 7.** Time-dependent UV-Vis spectra of the interaction of studied complexes and KO<sup>2</sup> in DMSO in the presence of neocuproine: (**a**) **1**; (**b**) **2**; (**c**) **3**; (**d**) **4**.

The redox behavior of the studied complexes (prepared in DMSO) was investigated by means of cyclic voltammetry using a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Figure 8 displays the cyclic

doped diamond (BDD) electrode. A summary of the basic redox parameters for the studied complexes are listed in the Table 5. In the cyclic voltammetric records, two potential regions were differentiated. In the first potential region between −0.136 V and – 0.085 V, Cu(II)/Cu(I)-based redox transitions were observed, which showed better resolved peak currents in the anodic scan, with *E*p,ox ranging from −0.136 V (**4**) to −0.124 V (**3**). In the cathodic scan, the corresponding reduction waves could be identified at a peak potential ranging from −0.097 V (**3**) to −0.083 V (**1**). The observation of both potentials for all studied complexes indicated the quasi-reversible redox process undertaken at the BDD electrode. The same conclusion could be read from values of the *I*p,ox/*I*p,red ratio, and the value of this ratio ranged from the lowest value of 1.3 for **3** to the highest of 2.1 for **4**. In the second potential region, quite distinctive voltammetric curves with oxidation peak potentials ranging from 0.633 V (**5**) to 0.941 V (**2**) could be noticed, which may be attributed to the redox activity within the bis(fenamate) ligand. Finally, to be good SOD mimetics, the redox potential (*E*° vs. Ag/AgCl) should fall between −0.363 V and +0.687 V, as in the case of a native SOD enzyme [27]. This criterion was succesfully fulfilled for all

studied complexes according their *E*1/2 values (Table 5).

*2.8. Cyclic Voltammetry* 

### *2.8. Cyclic Voltammetry*

The redox behavior of the studied complexes (prepared in DMSO) was investigated by means of cyclic voltammetry using a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Figure 8 displays the cyclic voltammograms of corresponding complexes **1–5** at a concentration level of 10−<sup>4</sup> M, which were registered in the presence of 0.1 M NaCl as a supporting electrolyte at the boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode. A summary of the basic redox parameters for the studied complexes are listed in the Table 5. In the cyclic voltammetric records, two potential regions were differentiated. In the first potential region between −0.136 V and –0.085 V, Cu(II)/Cu(I)-based redox transitions were observed, which showed better resolved peak currents in the anodic scan, with *E*p,ox ranging from −0.136 V (**4**) to −0.124 V (**3**). In the cathodic scan, the corresponding reduction waves could be identified at a peak potential ranging from −0.097 V (**3**) to −0.083 V (**1**). The observation of both potentials for all studied complexes indicated the quasi-reversible redox process undertaken at the BDD electrode. The same conclusion could be read from values of the *I*p,ox/*I*p,red ratio, and the value of this ratio ranged from the lowest value of 1.3 for **3** to the highest of 2.1 for **4**. In the second potential region, quite distinctive voltammetric curves with oxidation peak potentials ranging from 0.633 V (**5**) to 0.941 V (**2**) could be noticed, which may be attributed to the redox activity within the bis(fenamate) ligand. Finally, to be good SOD mimetics, the redox potential (*E* ◦ vs. Ag/AgCl) should fall between −0.363 V and +0.687 V, as in the case of a native SOD enzyme [27]. This criterion was succesfully fulfilled for all studied complexes according their *E*1/2 values (Table 5). *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 31

**Figure 8.** Cyclic voltammograms of **1**–**5** (c(complex) = 10<sup>−</sup>4 M) in 0.1 M NaCl measured at BDD electrode using scan rate of 100 mV/s. **Figure 8.** Cyclic voltammograms of **1**–**5** (c(complex) = 10−<sup>4</sup> M) in 0.1 M NaCl measured at BDD electrode using scan rate of 100 mV/s.

Transition metal complexes, such as copper complexes, can bind to DNA and thus induce DNA cleavage, which can be exploited in the preparation of DNA structural probes, cleavage or anticacer agents [45]. Moreover, if complexes contain ligands with suitable functional groups that can be involved in hydrogen bonding or in electrostatic,

to support the binding abilities of complexes toward the DNA [46]. Copper complexes can interact with DNA either covalently through the formation of covalent adducts (e.g., cisplatin) or non-covalently [47]. The non-covalent mode of binding between complexes and DNA includes intercalation (using mostly *π–π* stacking interactions), groove binding (van der Waals interactions or hydrogen bonding) and external binding (electrostatic interactions) [48]. Interactions of the prepared complexes **1–4** with calf thymus DNA were evaluated using UV-Vis absorption titrations and viscosity measurements, as well as with

The absorption spectra of the DMSO/buffer solutions of the studied complexes **1–4** exhibited a very similar pattern of absorption bands in the UV region from 250 nm to 400 nm (Figure 9). Two types of signals existed in the UV spectrum, which has different behavior upon the addition of DNA. First, for tree absorption bands with maxima located at 255, 262 and 269 nm, a sudden decrease in absorption was observed after the addition of the first amount of DNA. Then, the further addition of DNA led to band hyperchromism. Because the positions of the bands did not move after the addition of DNA, we assumed that the increase in absorbance was due to the further addition of DNA

**Table 5.** Redox parameters of **1**–**5** extracted from experimental CV data. **Table 5.** Redox parameters of **1**–**5** extracted from experimental CV data.


*2.9. ct-DNA Interaction Studies* 

2.9.1. Absorption Titrations

fluorescence emission with an ethidium bromide (EB) displacement method.

### *2.9. ct-DNA Interaction Studies*

Transition metal complexes, such as copper complexes, can bind to DNA and thus induce DNA cleavage, which can be exploited in the preparation of DNA structural probes, cleavage or anticacer agents [45]. Moreover, if complexes contain ligands with suitable functional groups that can be involved in hydrogen bonding or in electrostatic, hydrophilic/hydrophobic or *π–π* stacking interactions, then they can be rationally utilized to support the binding abilities of complexes toward the DNA [46]. Copper complexes can interact with DNA either covalently through the formation of covalent adducts (e.g., cis-platin) or non-covalently [47]. The non-covalent mode of binding between complexes and DNA includes intercalation (using mostly *π–π* stacking interactions), groove binding (van der Waals interactions or hydrogen bonding) and external binding (electrostatic interactions) [48]. Interactions of the prepared complexes **1–4** with calf thymus DNA were evaluated using UV-Vis absorption titrations and viscosity measurements, as well as with fluorescence emission with an ethidium bromide (EB) displacement method.

### 2.9.1. Absorption Titrations

The absorption spectra of the DMSO/buffer solutions of the studied complexes **1–4** exhibited a very similar pattern of absorption bands in the UV region from 250 nm to 400 nm (Figure 9). Two types of signals existed in the UV spectrum, which has different behavior upon the addition of DNA. First, for tree absorption bands with maxima located at 255, 262 and 269 nm, a sudden decrease in absorption was observed after the addition of the first amount of DNA. Then, the further addition of DNA led to band hyperchromism. Because the positions of the bands did not move after the addition of DNA, we assumed that the increase in absorbance was due to the further addition of DNA with an absorption band in this part of spectra (at 260 nm). Two other absorption peaks, coming from intraligand π to π\* transitions of aromatic NSAID moieties at around 280 nm (high-intensity discrete peak) and 320 nm (lower-intensity shoulder), showed a considerable decrease in the absorption of complexes (11.8% for **2** to 21.4% for **1**) together with a slight blue shift (1–5 nm) (Table 6). A hypochromic shift is usually associated with the stabilization of DNA secondary structures via electrostatic interactions or the intercalation of metal complexes [46,48]. The observed hypochromism and blue shift thus suggest an electrostatic or intercalative binding mode of complex–DNA interactions or their combination. However, as reported, absorption titrations give only preliminary information about complex–DNA interactions, and therefore, further measurements are necessary to clarify the binding mode [26]. The internal DNA binding *K*<sup>b</sup> constants of **1–4** were determined using the most intensive and best resolved band at 288 nm with the Wolfe–Shimmer equation (inset in Figure 9).

The values of the *K*<sup>b</sup> binding constants are collected in the Table 6. The obtained values of the *<sup>K</sup>*<sup>b</sup> constants ranged from 1.04 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> (**2**) to 5.46 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> (**4**) and are in good agreement with other Cu–fenamate complexes [23,27–30]. Such values indicate relatively strong binding of the studied complexes to DNA, likely due to their ability to form hydrogen bonds with DNA in combination with partial intercalation. Based on their binding strength with DNA, the complexes can be arranged as follows: **4** > **1** > **3** > **2**. The highest values of the binding constant were obtained for complexes with clonixinate and flufenamate ligands (5.46 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> and 4.83 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> , respectively). Based on these values, there seemed to be no apparent structural trend between structurally similar complexes **2**, **4** vs. **1**, **3** with respect to the planarity of complexes **2** and **4**. Instead, the combined effect of electrostatic interactions, which is stronger for **1**, and intercalation through coplanar pyridine and benzene rings, which prefer complex **4**, could be operative. However, as was noticed, the exact mode of binding of the complexes into DNA cannot be determined using only absorption titration studies, so further measurements are necessary to confirm the obtained results [24–27].

Wolfe–Shimmer equation (inset in Figure 9).

with an absorption band in this part of spectra (at 260 nm). Two other absorption peaks, coming from intraligand π to π\* transitions of aromatic NSAID moieties at around 280 nm (high-intensity discrete peak) and 320 nm (lower-intensity shoulder), showed a considerable decrease in the absorption of complexes (11.8% for **2** to 21.4% for **1**) together with a slight blue shift (1–5 nm) (Table 6). A hypochromic shift is usually associated with the stabilization of DNA secondary structures via electrostatic interactions or the intercalation of metal complexes [46,48]. The observed hypochromism and blue shift thus suggest an electrostatic or intercalative binding mode of complex–DNA interactions or their combination. However, as reported, absorption titrations give only preliminary information about complex–DNA interactions, and therefore, further measurements are necessary to clarify the binding mode [26]. The internal DNA binding *K*b constants of **1–4** were determined using the most intensive and best resolved band at 288 nm with the

**Figure 9.** UV-Vis spectra of DMSO/buffer solution of **1**–**4** in the absence and presence of increasing amounts of DNA (*r* = [DNA]/[complex] = 0–2.1). Arrows show changes in intensity upon the addition of increasing amounts of DNA. Inset: Plot of [DNA]/(εA-ε<sup>f</sup> ) versus [DNA] for complex. **Figure 9.** UV-Vis spectra of DMSO/buffer solution of **1**–**4** in the absence and presence of increasing amounts of DNA (*r* = [DNA]/[complex] = 0–2.1). Arrows show changes in intensity upon the addition of increasing amounts of DNA. Inset: Plot of [DNA]/(εA-ε<sup>f</sup> ) versus [DNA] for complex.

The values of the *K*b binding constants are collected in the Table 6. The obtained

values of the *K*b constants ranged from 1.04 × 105 (**2**) to 5.46 × 105 M−1 (**4**) and are in good **Table 6.** DNA binding constant and UV spectral features of **1–4** in the presence of DNA.


\* denotes blue shift.

### 2.9.2. Viscosity Measurements

Because DNA viscosity manifests sensitivity to DNA length changes in the presence of a DNA binder, it was desirable to carry out the DNA viscosity measurements in the presence of complexes with potential binding activity [48]. The DNA viscosity measurements were performed on DNA solutions in the presence of increasing concentrations of complexes **1–4**. In addition, the planar molecule of ethidium bromide (EB), which is known as a perfect nonspecific DNA intercalating agent, was used as an indicator of intercalation. As is clearly seen in Figure 10, in the presence of growing concentrations of complexes, a continual increase in the relative DNA viscosity for all four complexes was observed. This behavior supports the hypothesis about the intercalative interaction between the complex molecules and DNA. The results reveal that the best intercalating ability in this series had a complex with the flufenamate ligand (**1**). On the other hand, the relative DNA viscosity of the complex with clonixinate (**4**) gave, in this case, the lowest increase in the studied series (**1** > **2** ≈ **3** > **4**). A comparison with an EB molecule suggests that the studied complexes were weaker intercalating agents than EB, but it can be noted that all four complexes could bind to DNA via partial intercalation. Finally, no apparent trend between structurally similar complexes **2**, **4** vs. **1**, **3** was visible.

the obtained results [24–27].

2.9.2. Viscosity Measurements

\* denotes blue shift.

**Figure 10.** Relative viscosity of DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of studied complexes (**1– 4**) under the condition of increasing the concentration ratio [complex]/DNA. **Figure 10.** Relative viscosity of DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of studied complexes (**1–4**) under the condition of increasing the concentration ratio [complex]/DNA. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 31

flufenamate ligands (5.46 x105 M−1 and 4.83 × 105 M−1, respectively). Based on these values, there seemed to be no apparent structural trend between structurally similar complexes **2**, **4** vs. **1**, **3** with respect to the planarity of complexes **2** and **4**. Instead, the combined effect of electrostatic interactions, which is stronger for **1**, and intercalation through coplanar pyridine and benzene rings, which prefer complex **4**, could be operative. However, as was noticed, the exact mode of binding of the complexes into DNA cannot be determined using only absorption titration studies, so further measurements are necessary to confirm

**Table 6.** DNA binding constant and UV spectral features of **1–4** in the presence of DNA.

[Cu(fluf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**1**) 4.83 (±0.84) ∙ 105 0.9897 287(21.4, −1) [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**) 1.04 (±0.75) ∙ 105 0.8699 287(11.8, −2) [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**) 2.52 (±0.87) ∙ 105 0.9551 288(15.7, −3) [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) 5.46 (±0.87) ∙ 105 0.9906 281(12,3,−5)

**Complex** *Kb* **[M−1]** *R2 λ*(**nm**)(**ΔA/A0** (**%**)**, Δλ \*** (**nm**)

Because DNA viscosity manifests sensitivity to DNA length changes in the presence of a DNA binder, it was desirable to carry out the DNA viscosity measurements in the presence of complexes with potential binding activity [48]. The DNA viscosity measurements were performed on DNA solutions in the presence of increasing concentrations of complexes **1–4**. In addition, the planar molecule of ethidium bromide (EB), which is known as a perfect nonspecific DNA intercalating agent, was used as an indicator of intercalation. As is clearly seen in Figure 10, in the presence of growing concentrations of complexes, a continual increase in the relative DNA viscosity for all four complexes was observed. This behavior supports the hypothesis about the intercalative interaction between the complex molecules and DNA. The results reveal that the best intercalating ability in this series had a complex with the flufenamate ligand (**1**). On the other hand, the relative DNA viscosity of the complex with clonixinate (**4**) gave, in this case, the lowest increase in the studied series (**1** > **2** ≈ **3** > **4**). A comparison with an EB molecule suggests that the studied complexes were weaker intercalating agents than EB, but it can be noted that all four complexes could bind to DNA via partial intercalation. Finally, no apparent trend between structurally similar complexes **2**, **4** vs. **1**, **3** was visible.

### 2.9.3. Competitive Studies with EB-DNA 2.9.3. Competitive Studies with EB-DNA

Another method that was used to investigate the intercalating ability of complexes to DNA was a competitive study of the DNA interactions of the complexes with the ethidium bromide (EB) displacement method. EB represents a typical DNA intercalator that intercalates into DNA, and at the same time, it is a very effective fluorophore in the presence of DNA. When EB interacts with DNA, it creates an EB-DNA adduct that emits an intense fluorescence emission band at 615 nm when excited at 540 nm. The addition of a complex with an affinity to DNA lowers the emission intensity of the EB adduct due to competition with EB at the same binding sites in DNA. The representative fluorescence emission spectra of **4** are shown in Figure 11. The addition of increased concentrations of complexes led to a decrease in the intensity of the emission band of the EB-DNA adduct at 615 nm. The final quenching of the fluorescence reached 30–35% of the initial EB-DNA fluorescence intensity (Figure 11). Very similar results of quenching with copper fenamates were also observed by other authors [21]. The observed moderate decrease in EB-DNA fluorescence emission in the presence of complexes indicates their competitive binding ability when compared with EB. The quenching of EB bound to DNA is in good accordance with the linear Stern–Volmer equation, thus providing further proof of the observed DNA-binding ability of the studied complexes. The calculated values of the *<sup>K</sup>*sv constant (3.30–3.79 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>3</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> ) confirmed the moderate intercalative ability of the complexes towards DNA (Table 7) when comparing these values with other copper fenamates, which show values of *K*sv 105–10<sup>6</sup> [22,26,29]. In addition, the calculated values of the EB-DNA quenching rate constant *k*<sup>q</sup> of order 10<sup>11</sup> M−<sup>1</sup> s −1 (Table 7) suggest the presence of a static quenching mechanism (*k*<sup>q</sup> > 10<sup>11</sup> M−<sup>1</sup> s −1 ) [5]. Another method that was used to investigate the intercalating ability of complexes to DNA was a competitive study of the DNA interactions of the complexes with the ethidium bromide (EB) displacement method. EB represents a typical DNA intercalator that intercalates into DNA, and at the same time, it is a very effective fluorophore in the presence of DNA. When EB interacts with DNA, it creates an EB-DNA adduct that emits an intense fluorescence emission band at 615 nm when excited at 540 nm. The addition of a complex with an affinity to DNA lowers the emission intensity of the EB adduct due to competition with EB at the same binding sites in DNA. The representative fluorescence emission spectra of **4** are shown in Figure 11b. The addition of increased concentrations of complexes led to a decrease in the intensity of the emission band of the EB-DNA adduct at 615 nm. The final quenching of the fluorescence reached 30–35% of the initial EB-DNA fluorescence intensity (Figure 11). Very similar results of quenching with copper fenamates were also observed by other authors [21]. The observed moderate decrease in EB-DNA fluorescence emission in the presence of complexes indicates their competitive binding ability when compared with EB. The quenching of EB bound to DNA is in good accordance with the linear Stern–Volmer equation, thus providing further proof of the observed DNA-binding ability of the studied complexes. The calculated values of the *K*sv constant (3.30–3.79 × 103 M−1) confirmed the moderate intercalative ability of the complexes towards DNA (Table 7) when comparing these values with other copper fenamates, which show values of *K*sv 105–106 [22,26,29]. In addition, the calculated values of the EB-DNA quenching rate constant *k*q of order 1011 M−1 s−1 (Table 7) suggest the presence of a static quenching mechanism (*k*q > 1011 M−1 s−1) [5].

**Figure 11.** Graphical dependence of relative EB-DNA fluorescence emission intensity (I/I0) at 615 nm vs. concentration ratio [complex]/DNA for **1**–**4**. Fluorescence emission spectra for EB-DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of increasing amounts of **4**. **Figure 11.** Graphical dependence of relative EB-DNA fluorescence emission intensity (I/I<sup>0</sup> ) at 615 nm vs. concentration ratio [complex]/DNA for **1**–**4**. Fluorescence emission spectra for EB-DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of increasing amounts of **4**.

**Table 7.** EB-DNA fluorescence (%), calculated Stern–Volmer constant *K*SV and the quenching rate

[Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**) 36.7 3.79 (±0.13) 1.65 (±0.06) [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**) 31.2 3.40(±0.09) 1.48 (±0.04) [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) 33.6 3.30(±0.08) 1.44 (±0.04) DMSO 30.9 3.03(±0.07) 1.32 (±0.03)

**Complex ∆***I***/***I0* (**%**) *Ksv* (**M−1**)**/103** *kq* (**M−1s−1**)**/1011**

The fluorescence emission spectra of bovine serum albumin showed intense fluorescence emission at 336 nm due to the existence of two tryptophan moieties at positions 134 and 212. The interaction of complexes **1**‒**4** with bovine serum albumin was studied by monitoring spectral changes in tryptophan fluorescence emission after the addition of complexes [49]. The graphical dependence of the relative BSA fluorescence

constant *k*q of DMSO and complexes **1–4**.

*2.10. Interaction of Studied Complexes with BSA* 


**Table 7.** EB-DNA fluorescence (%), calculated Stern–Volmer constant *K*SV and the quenching rate constant *k*q of DMSO and complexes **1–4**.

### *2.10. Interaction of Studied Complexes with BSA*

The fluorescence emission spectra of bovine serum albumin showed intense fluorescence emission at 336 nm due to the existence of two tryptophan moieties at positions 134 and 212. The interaction of complexes **1**–**4** with bovine serum albumin was studied by monitoring spectral changes in tryptophan fluorescence emission after the addition of complexes [49]. The graphical dependence of the relative BSA fluorescence intensity on increasing amounts of complexes **1**–**4** showed significant quenching of the fluorescence up to 89–91% for all studied complexes (Figure 12). *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 19 of 31 intensity on increasing amounts of complexes **1**‒**4** showed significant quenching of the fluorescence up to 89–91% for all studied complexes (Figure 12).

**Figure 12.** (**a**) Graphical dependence of relative BSA fluorescence intensity in % at *λ* = 336 nm vs. concentration ratio [complex]/BSA. (**b**) Fluorescence emission spectra for EB-DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of increasing amounts of **4**. **Figure 12.** (**a**) Graphical dependence of relative BSA fluorescence intensity in % at *λ* = 336 nm vs. concentration ratio [complex]/BSA. (**b**) Fluorescence emission spectra for EB-DNA in the buffer solution in the presence of increasing amounts of **4**.

These results confirm the fact that the complexes were able to bind to serum albumin in significant amounts, likely through tryptophan residue. In addition, the interaction of complexes with serum albumin was characterized with the Stern–Volmer constant *K*sv and the quenching constant *k*q, which was calculated using the Stern–Volmer equation. Furthermore, the association binding constant *K*BSA and the number of binding sites per albumin *n*, were determined using the Scatchard equation as well (Supplementary Figure S20). The obtained values are summarized in Table 8. The values of the *K*sv constants of order 4–5 × 105 M−1 indicate an intermediate binding strength between the complexes and albumin. The presented values of the quenching constant *k*q of order 1013 are much larger than 1010 M−1s−1, which represents a typical value for a quencher used in biopolymer quenchers. High values also indicate that quenching is performed through the static quenching mechanism [21,28]. The highest quenching ability was observed for complexes **1** and **4** according to their *k*q values. As reported, the optimal range assumed for a serum albumin drug delivery system (capable of providing adequate transport and distribution in the bloodstream and reversible release of the drug to the target) should have *K*sv values in the range of 102–108 M−1 and *K*BSA values in the range of 104−106 M−1 [49]. The calculated values of *K*sv and *K*BSA for the studied complexes **1**–**4** are within the optimal range. These results confirm the fact that the complexes were able to bind to serum albumin in significant amounts, likely through tryptophan residue. In addition, the interaction of complexes with serum albumin was characterized with the Stern–Volmer constant *K*sv and the quenching constant *k*q, which was calculated using the Stern–Volmer equation. Furthermore, the association binding constant *K*BSA and the number of binding sites per albumin *n*, were determined using the Scatchard equation as well (Supplementary Figure S20). The obtained values are summarized in Table 8. The values of the *K*sv constants of order 4–5 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>5</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> indicate an intermediate binding strength between the complexes and albumin. The presented values of the quenching constant *k*<sup>q</sup> of order 10<sup>13</sup> are much larger than 10<sup>10</sup> M−<sup>1</sup> s −1 , which represents a typical value for a quencher used in biopolymer quenchers. High values also indicate that quenching is performed through the static quenching mechanism [21,28]. The highest quenching ability was observed for complexes **1** and **4** according to their *k*<sup>q</sup> values. As reported, the optimal range assumed for a serum albumin drug delivery system (capable of providing adequate transport and distribution in the bloodstream and reversible release of the drug to the target) should have *K*sv values in the range of 102–10<sup>8</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> and *<sup>K</sup>*BSA values in the range of 104−10<sup>6</sup> <sup>M</sup>−<sup>1</sup> [49]. The calculated values of *K*sv and *K*BSA for the studied complexes **1**–**4** are within the optimal range.

**Table 8.** Values of the Stern–Volmer quenching constant (*K*sv), quenching constant (*k*q), association binding constant (*K*BSA) and *n* (number of binding sites for albumin) obtained for the interaction of

[Cu(fluf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**1**) 5.777 2.51 (±0.061) 3.39 (±0.413) 1.11 [Cu(nifl)2(dena)2] (**2**) 4.411 1.92 (±0.073) 2.18 (±0.164) 1.16 [Cu(tolf)2(dena)2(H2O)2] (**3**) 4.740 2.06 (±0.092) 3.36 (±0.417) 1.10 [Cu(clon)2(dena)2] (**4**) 5.558 2.42 (±0.054) 3.32 (±0.147) 1.08

**Complex** *Ksv* (**M−1**)**/105** *kq* (**M−1s−1**)**/1013** *KBSA*(**M−1**)**/105** *n* 

Copper complexes **1–4** were tested for their in vitro cytotoxicity against three cancer cell lines, including human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), human glioblastoma cells (U-118MG) and a healthy human lung fibroblast cell line (MRC-5), respectively. The cells (8 × 103 cells/200 μL well) were treated with several

**1**‒**4** with bovine serum albumin.

*2.11. Anticancer Activity* 


**Table 8.** Values of the Stern–Volmer quenching constant (*K*sv), quenching constant (*k*q), association binding constant (*K*BSA) and *n* (number of binding sites for albumin) obtained for the interaction of **1**–**4** with bovine serum albumin.

### *2.11. Anticancer Activity*

Copper complexes **1–4** were tested for their in vitro cytotoxicity against three cancer cell lines, including human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), human glioblastoma cells (U-118MG) and a healthy human lung fibroblast cell line (MRC-5), respectively. The cells (8 <sup>×</sup> <sup>10</sup><sup>3</sup> cells/200 µL well) were treated with several concentrations (20–100 µmol/L) of **1–4** for 24, 48 and 72 h, and the cytotoxicity was evaluated using an MTT assay. The measurement was repeated twice using three parallels for each concentration. The inhibitory concentration values (*IC*50) of the studied complexes for the A549 and U-118MG cancer cell lines were higher than the highest concentration used of 100 µM at each incubation time (data not shown). In the case of the MCF-7 tumor cell line, the same results were obtained for complexes **1–3** (*IC*<sup>50</sup> > 100 µM). On the other hand, complex **4** showed cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells after 72 h of exposure with an *IC*<sup>50</sup> value of 57 ± 3 µM. As can be seen from the graph (Figure 13a), the viability of the MCF-7 tumor cells decreased with increasing concentrations of **4** for 72 h of exposure. In addition, no cytotoxic effect was observed on healthy MRC-5 cells for 72 h of incubation under the same conditions (Figure 13b). *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 20 of 31 concentrations (20–100 μmol/L) of **1–4** for 24, 48 and 72 h, and the cytotoxicity was evaluated using an MTT assay. The measurement was repeated twice using three parallels for each concentration. The inhibitory concentration values (*IC*50) of the studied complexes for the A549 and U-118MG cancer cell lines were higher than the highest concentration used of 100 μM at each incubation time (data not shown). In the case of the MCF-7 tumor cell line, the same results were obtained for complexes **1–3** (*IC*50 > 100 μM). On the other hand, complex **4** showed cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells after 72 h of exposure with an *IC*50 value of 57 ± 3 μM. As can be seen from the graph (Figure 13a), the viability of the MCF-7 tumor cells decreased with increasing concentrations of **4** for 72 h of exposure. In addition, no cytotoxic effect was observed on healthy MRC-5 cells for 72 h of incubation under the same conditions (Figure 13b).

**Figure 13.** Cell proliferation of (**a**) MCF-7 cancer cells and (**b**) MRC-5 healthy cells in response to **4** after 72 h of exposure. Cell lines were treated (20–100 μmol/L) with complex **4**, and viable cells were evaluated using a colorimetric assay. **Figure 13.** Cell proliferation of (**a**) MCF-7 cancer cells and (**b**) MRC-5 healthy cells in response to **4** after 72 h of exposure. Cell lines were treated (20–100 µmol/L) with complex **4**, and viable cells were evaluated using a colorimetric assay.

Complex **4** contains the ligand clonixin in its structure, which has antipyretic, antianalgesic and antirheumatic effects, and especially anti-inflammatory effects [50]. The antitumor effects of clonixin alone or of copper complexes with clonixin have not been described so far. However, some authors have focused on the effect of clonixin with platinum, as the anti-inflammatory strategy is key in the treatment of aggressive cancer diseases [51]. They investigated a platinum (IV) prodrug complex with NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) as ligands designed to effectively enter tumor cells due to their high lipophilicity, where they can release a cytotoxic metabolite [51]. This mechanism reduces side effects and increases the therapeutic efficacy of the drug used in chemotherapy. Copper(II) complexes containing coordinated clonixin seem to be a potential metallo-drug for closer follow-up of its biological effects, as we did not observe Complex **4** contains the ligand clonixin in its structure, which has antipyretic, antianalgesic and antirheumatic effects, and especially anti-inflammatory effects [50]. The antitumor effects of clonixin alone or of copper complexes with clonixin have not been described so far. However, some authors have focused on the effect of clonixin with platinum, as the anti-inflammatory strategy is key in the treatment of aggressive cancer diseases [51]. They investigated a platinum (IV) prodrug complex with NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) as ligands designed to effectively enter tumor cells due to their high lipophilicity, where they can release a cytotoxic metabolite [51]. This mechanism reduces side effects and increases the therapeutic efficacy of the drug used in chemotherapy. Copper(II) complexes containing coordinated clonixin seem to be a potential metallo-drug for closer follow-up of its biological effects, as we did not observe a

> a cytotoxic effect on healthy MRC-5 cells for 72 h of incubation under the same conditions (Figure 13b). In addition, copper complexes with tolfenamic, mefenamic and flufenamic

> effect of these substances according to their ability to generate intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an enzyme that is overexpressed in breast tumors. They detected DNA damage, JNK and p38 pathway

> In the second step of our biological research, we were interested in the genotoxic effect of the selected copper complexes. Considering that complexes **1–3** did not show any cytotoxic activity for 72 h of incubation with A549, U-118MG and MCF-7 tumor cells in the concentration range (20–100 μmol/L), we chose complex **4** with an *IC*50 of 57 × μM. We affected MCF-7 cells with the *IC*50 value and monitored DNA damage after 72 h of incubation. Unfortunately, we did not observe any significant DNA damage compared to

activation and an apoptosis pathway [27].

cytotoxic effect on healthy MRC-5 cells for 72 h of incubation under the same conditions (Figure 13b). In addition, copper complexes with tolfenamic, mefenamic and flufenamic acids and phenanthroline can have anti-tumor effects [27]. The authors confirmed the effect of these substances according to their ability to generate intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an enzyme that is overexpressed in breast tumors. They detected DNA damage, JNK and p38 pathway activation and an apoptosis pathway [27].

In the second step of our biological research, we were interested in the genotoxic effect of the selected copper complexes. Considering that complexes **1–3** did not show any cytotoxic activity for 72 h of incubation with A549, U-118MG and MCF-7 tumor cells in the concentration range (20–100 µmol/L), we chose complex **4** with an *IC*<sup>50</sup> of 57 × µM. We affected MCF-7 cells with the *IC*<sup>50</sup> value and monitored DNA damage after 72 h of incubation. Unfortunately, we did not observe any significant DNA damage compared to control cells, which were not affected by **4** (Figure 14). The DNA damage did not exceed a threshold of 10%, which is considered relevant DNA damage. *Inorganics* **2023**, *11*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 21 of 31 control cells, which were not affected by **4** (Figure 14). The DNA damage did not exceed a threshold of 10%, which is considered relevant DNA damage.

### **3. Materials and Methods 3. Materials and Methods**

**General procedures.** All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received unless noted otherwise. **General procedures.** All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received unless noted otherwise.

#### *3.1. Synthesis 3.1. Synthesis*

### **[Cu**(**fluf**)**2**(**dena**)**2**(**H2O**)**2]** (**1**) **[Cu**(**fluf**)**2**(**dena**)**2**(**H2O**)**2]** (**1**)

**[Cu**(**nifl**)**2**(**dena**)**2]** (**2**)

**[Cu**(**tolf**)**2**(**dena**)**2**(**H2O**)**2]** (**3**)

Complex **1** was prepared with the following procedure. Copper acetate dihydrate (1 mmol, 0.170 g) was dissolved in 30 mL of ethanol. Then, sodium flufenamate, formed in situ by mixing an equimolar amount of flufenamic acid (2 mmol, 0.564 g) with sodium hydroxide (2 mmol, 0.080 g), was slowly poured into the solution. The solution immediately changed color from blue-green to green. After 10 min, *N,N*diethylnicotinamide (2 mmol, 0.356 g, 0.4 mL) was added dropwise to form a clear dark green solution. After a while, a dark green precipitate was formed. Afterward, the mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, before the crude product was filtered through smooth filtration paper and dried in the air. The pale green needle-like crystals of **1** Complex **1** was prepared with the following procedure. Copper acetate dihydrate (1 mmol, 0.170 g) was dissolved in 30 mL of ethanol. Then, sodium flufenamate, formed in situ by mixing an equimolar amount of flufenamic acid (2 mmol, 0.564 g) with sodium hydroxide (2 mmol, 0.080 g), was slowly poured into the solution. The solution immediately changed color from blue-green to green. After 10 min, *N*, *N*-diethylnicotinamide (2 mmol, 0.356 g, 0.4 mL) was added dropwise to form a clear dark green solution. After a while, a dark green precipitate was formed. Afterward, the mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, before the crude product was filtered through smooth filtration paper and dried in the air. The pale green needle-like crystals of **1** suitable for crystallographic analyses were isolated from the mother liquor after a week.

suitable for crystallographic analyses were isolated from the mother liquor after a week. Yield: 0.71 g (70%). Anal. calc. for C48H50CuF6N6O8 (*M*r = 1016.504): C 57.29, H 4.93, N 8.70 %. Found: C 56.72, H 4.96, N 8.27 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3507 (m), 3324 (w), 3218 (w), 3091 (m), 2979 (m), 2934 (w), 1619 (s), 1606 (s), 1581 (s), 1568 (s), 1499 (s), 1456 (s), 1421 (ms), 1378 (vs), 1331 (vs), 1284 (s), 1183 (ms), 1159 (ms), 1109 (vs), 1069 (s), 1046 (ms), 997 (m), 930 (m), 872 (m), 826 (m), 753 (s), 697 (s), 650 (m). UV-Vis: λ / nm (ε/M−1cm−1) as nujol mulls (nm): 210, 234 (sh), 287 (sh), 322 (sh), 412 (sh), 646; in DMSO / H2O: 255 (35440), 262 (40030), 269 (44900), 287 (62300), 320 (28300, sh), 795 (65). Yield: 0.71 g (70%). Anal. calc. for C48H50CuF6N6O<sup>8</sup> (*M*<sup>r</sup> = 1016.504): C 57.29, H 4.93, N 8.70 %. Found: C 56.72, H 4.96, N 8.27 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3507 (m), 3324 (w), 3218 (w), 3091 (m), 2979 (m), 2934 (w), 1619 (s), 1606 (s), 1581 (s), 1568 (s), 1499 (s), 1456 (s), 1421 (ms), 1378 (vs), 1331 (vs), 1284 (s), 1183 (ms), 1159 (ms), 1109 (vs), 1069 (s), 1046 (ms), 997 (m), 930 (m), 872 (m), 826 (m), 753 (s), 697 (s), 650 (m). UV-Vis: λ / nm (ε/M−<sup>1</sup> cm−<sup>1</sup> ) as nujol mulls (nm): 210, 234 (sh), 287 (sh), 322 (sh), 412 (sh), 646; in DMSO / H2O: 255 (35440), 262 (40030), 269 (44900), 287 (62300), 320 (28300, sh), 795 (65). **[Cu**(**nifl**)**2**(**dena**)**2]** (**2**)

Complex **2** was prepared with the same procedure used for complex **1**. Violet

Yield: 0.56 g (57%). Anal. calc. for C48H44CuF6N8O6 (*M*r = 982.448): C 57.05, H 4.70, N

2979 (m), 2936 (w), 2874 (w), 1629 (s), 1595 (vs), 1582 (vs), 1518 (s), 1494 (s), 1456 (s), 1420 (ms), 1387 (s), 1368 (s), 1324 (vs), 1293 (sh), 1160 (s), 1115 (s), 1096 (s), 1067 (s), 997 (w), 943 (m), 869 (m), 826 (m), 783 (s), 699 (s), 670 (m),471 (m), 413 (m). UV-Vis: λ/nm (ε/M−1cm−1) as nujol mulls (nm): 203 (sh), 286, 343 (sh), 412 (sh), 539 (br); in DMSO/H2O: 262 (36270),

Dark green crystals of **3** suitable for X-ray analysis were isolated after two weeks. Yield: 0.69 g (75%). Anal. calc. for C48H54Cl2CuN6O8 (*M*r = 977.450): C 59.70, H 5.86, N 9.82 %. Found: C 58.98, H 5.57, N 8.60 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3458 (m), 3206 (m, br), 3094 (m),

11.83 %. Found: C 56.24, H 4.51, N 11.41 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3269 (w), 3163 (w), 3117 (w), 23

269 (46000), 287 (68950), 320 (14830, sh), 791 (95).

prismatic crystals suitable for X-ray analysis formed after a week.

Complex **2** was prepared with the same procedure used for complex **1**. Violet prismatic crystals suitable for X-ray analysis formed after a week.

Yield: 0.56 g (57%). Anal. calc. for C48H44CuF6N8O<sup>6</sup> (*M*<sup>r</sup> = 982.448): C 57.05, H 4.70, N 11.83 %. Found: C 56.24, H 4.51, N 11.41 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3269 (w), 3163 (w), 3117 (w), 2979 (m), 2936 (w), 2874 (w), 1629 (s), 1595 (vs), 1582 (vs), 1518 (s), 1494 (s), 1456 (s), 1420 (ms), 1387 (s), 1368 (s), 1324 (vs), 1293 (sh), 1160 (s), 1115 (s), 1096 (s), 1067 (s), 997 (w), 943 (m), 869 (m), 826 (m), 783 (s), 699 (s), 670 (m),471 (m), 413 (m). UV-Vis: λ/nm (ε/M−<sup>1</sup> cm−<sup>1</sup> ) as nujol mulls (nm): 203 (sh), 286, 343 (sh), 412 (sh), 539 (br); in DMSO/H2O: 262 (36270), 269 (46000), 287 (68950), 320 (14830, sh), 791 (95).

### **[Cu**(**tolf**)**2**(**dena**)**2**(**H2O**)**2]** (**3**)

Dark green crystals of **3** suitable for X-ray analysis were isolated after two weeks. Yield: 0.69 g (75%). Anal. calc. for C48H54Cl2CuN6O<sup>8</sup> (*M*<sup>r</sup> = 977.450): C 59.70, H 5.86, N 9.82 %. Found: C 58.98, H 5.57, N 8.60 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3458 (m), 3206 (m, br), 3094 (m), 2992 (m), 2938 (w), 1613 (s), 1579 (s), 1557 (s), 1493 (s), 1442 (s), 1377 (vs), 1281 (s), 1186 (m), 1107 (m), 1008 (m), 947 (m), 879 (m), 831 (m), 758 (s), 736 (s), 699 (s), 636 (m), 528 (m), 416 (m). UV-Vis: λ/nm (ε/M−<sup>1</sup> cm−<sup>1</sup> ) as nujol mulls (nm): 221 (sh), 246 (sh), 294 (sh), 338 (sh), 412 (sh), 628 (br); in DMSO/H2O: 255 (20820), 261 (21550), 269 (22550), 288 (26660), 325 (12520, sh), 789 (230).

### **[Cu**(**clon**)**2**(**dena**)**2]** (**4**)

Complex **4** was prepared with the same procedure used for complex **1,** with the exception of the used solvent, which was, in this case, methanol. Brown prismatic crystals suitable for X-ray analysis formed after a week.

Yield: 0.68 g (72%). Anal. calc. for C46H48Cl2CuN8O<sup>6</sup> (*M*<sup>r</sup> = 943.395): C 59.56, H 5.07, N 11.93 %. Found: C 58.56, H 5.13, N 11.88 %. IR (ATR, cm–1): 3275 (w), 3186 (w), 3114 (w), 3066 (w), 2980 (w), 2937 (w), 1629 (s), 1602 (s), 1585 (s), 1519 (s), 1456 (s), 1434 (ms), 1380 (m), 1358 (s), 1315 (vs), 1256 (ms), 1189 (m), 1101 (m), 1015 (m), 924 (m), 880 (w), 823 (m), 766 (vs), 702 (s), 653 (m), 536 (m), 414 (m). UV-Vis: λ/nm (ε/M−<sup>1</sup> cm−<sup>1</sup> ) as nujol mulls (nm): 224 (sh), 298, 340 (sh), 419 (sh), 529 (br), 629 (sh); in DMSO/H2O: 262 (54960), 268 (55100), 281 (51900), 320 (18170, sh), 794 (116).
