*3.2. A Glimpse of the Quality of Life among Workers with Disabilities*

In this study, the quality of life of employees with impairments was evaluated using the WHOQoL-BREF as the standard of measurement. An evaluation of the quality of life involved the domain of physical health, psychological, social bound, and environment, respectively, in this research. This research found that when compared to other dimensions of quality of life, the social bound domain had the greatest mean value. However, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, the average value of all categories of quality of life for RTW participants was greater than for those who did not engage in the RTW program.

**Figure 1.** The comparative value of the domains of the disabled employees' QoL in relation to WAI among the RTW and those who did not participate in the RTW. (**a**) Physical health, (**b**) social bound, (**c**) psychological, and (**d**) environmental health.

The data suggest that there may be a noticeable difference in the quality of life for disabled workers, as evidenced by the measurements of QOL and WAI. Moreover, according to Figure 1, which provides a look into the quality of life among workers with disabilities in Indonesia during the COVID-19 outbreak, individuals who participated in RTW program

showed a higher level of quality of life in all domains than workers who did not participate in the RTW program. As shown in Figure 1, the horizontal axis represents the domain of QOL of the participants in the study. The vertical axis represents the work ability index (WAI) of the participants in the study. Figure 1a shows that the workers who participated in RTW programs tended to have better physical health) outcomes (OR (0.988), mean S.D. (72.94 ± 11.94)) and WAI score compared to those who did not participate. Additionally, the same pattern of outcomes was seen in other domains including social bound (Figure 1b, OR (1.029), mean S.D. (76.14 + 14.45)), psychological health (Figure 1c, OR (0.956), mean S.D. (74.35 ± 10.13)), and environmental health (Figure 1d, OR (1.062), mean S.D. (69.89 ± 8.78)).

The results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 1, indicating that the working period, workability index, and the domain of environmental health in the quality of life had a *p*-value of less than 0.05, showing a statistically significant relationship between participation in the RTW program and the variables. In this case, the *p*-value of 0.023 suggests that there is a statistically significant relationship between participation in the RTW program and the environmental health domain of quality of life.
