**Appendix B**

**Table A2.** People willingness to stop or reduce meat consumption because of its environmental impact.






*Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health* **2019**, *16*, 1220

**Table A2.** *Cont*.







*Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health* **2019**, *16*, 1220


Schösler et al., 2015 [36] \*

Face-to-face interview; 2013

Netherlands; quota samples of second- generation migrants: Turkish/Kurdish

Gender differences

As an individual, you can make a big difference to nature and climate protection by choosing one (or more) meals without meat every week.

Willingness to reduce meat consumption (including 'yes', 'maybe')

Willingness to reduce: 17% Turks (monoculture), 53% Chinese (monoculture), 40%

Turkish men followed by Turkish women reported lowest willingness to reduce meat consumption; no gender differences for Native Dutch and Chinese.

Native Dutch

in meat consumption and reduction across ethnic group

*N*

Dutch *N*

= 357; 47–49% men

 = 350, Chinese/Hong Kongese *N* = 350, Native

rather conscious, 53% agree with meat reduction.




