*Proceeding Paper* **Experimental Investigation of Battery Thermal Management System of Lithium-Ion Cells Using PCM †**

**Sarmad Ali \* and Muhammad Mahabat Khan**

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; drmahabat@cust.edu.pk


**Abstract:** Experimental analysis of the effect of a lithium-ion battery thermal management system using natural convection and phase change material (PCM) at 3 C discharge rate. The cells are placed in a 2 × 2 square configuration in an acrylic housing with the capability to contain PCM. The experimental setup simulates lithium-ion batteries using ceramic heaters, producing the heat energy per unit volume as produced in a lithium-ion cell. The system placed in natural convection instantly heats up to 45 ◦C in 305 s. On the other hand, the system, when placed in phase change material, shows that a temperature of 45 ◦C is achieved in 1490 s.

**Keywords:** lithium-ion battery; thermal storage; phase change material; battery thermal management mystem; passive cooling

### **1. Introduction**

Lithium-ion batteries have been replacing non-renewable energy sources over the past decade in order to have a clean and green environment with fewer carbon emissions. The internal combustion engines used in vehicles play a major role in the carbon emissions causing global warming [1]. A uniform temperature within the safe limits for lithium-ion batteries should be maintained for optimal operation during the charging and discharging cycle of the cell. There are a number of methods to control these temperatures, some of which are liquid cooling [2], air cooling [3], and phase change materials passive cooling. The phase change material-based BTMS was first proposed by Al-Hallaj and Selman [4]. Their study conducted a performance evaluation of the thermal management system for lithiumion batteries using both air and PCM. The findings showed that the battery's discharge rate and ambient temperature have a significant impact on the air-cooling management system's performance, with high ambient temperatures and moderate discharge rates making it impossible to maintain a safe battery temperature [2]. Wang et al. conducted an experimental investigation into the impact of utilizing fins on enhancing battery TMS performance. In their technique, paraffin with a melting temperature of 44 ◦C was used. The average battery temperature was reduced by 8 ◦C [5].

PCMs with high latent heat storage are a very effective passive cooling method for lithium-ion cells. Battery thermal management systems (TMSs) have been rigorously tested numerically by previous research; however, the numerical analysis of battery TMSs has many simplifications to obtain favorable results. Real-time ambient environment effects with an increase and decrease in ambient temperature cannot be studied numerically. This leads us to the development of an experimental model to simulate the batteries for analysis and investigation of cell temperatures in natural convection, as well as when placed in PCM at a high discharge rate.

**Citation:** Ali, S.; Khan, M.M. Experimental Investigation of Battery Thermal Management System of Lithium-Ion Cells Using PCM. *Eng. Proc.* **2023**, *45*, 52. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/engproc2023045052

Academic Editors: Mohammad Javed Hyder, Muhammad Irfan and Manzar Masud

Published: 19 September 2023

#### **2. Methodology**

The experimental setup is designed to simulate the heat generation rates of an 18,650 lithium-ion cell using ceramic heaters placed inside an aluminum housing. The aluminum housing and the heater combined have the same dimensions as the 18,650 lithium-ion cell, which is 18 mm in diameter and 65 mm in height. A circuit using a combination of microcontrollers and ICs was designed for pulse wave modulation (PWM), producing similar discharging/charging waves as conducted by the lithium-ion cell controlled by the amount of power supplied in Watts to the ceramic heaters. The circuit has the capability of producing 0.05 W to 6 W with increments of 0.05 W. The circuit, with its current capability, has the ability to simulate 1C, 2C, and 3C discharge rates in a 2 × 2 square configuration of cells. The circuit connected to the cells is shown in Figure 1. The acrylic housing containing the whole system is 72 mm × 72 mm in length and width and has a height of 85 mm.

**Figure 1.** Schematic of the cells in PCM with the data acquisition system.

The data acquisition system includes thermocouples paired with Arduinos for temperature measurement both for the cell and PCM.

The C rating is a crucial performance parameter that describes the discharge and charge capabilities of the battery. It indicates the rate at which a battery can be discharged or charged in relation to its capacity. The C rating is expressed as a multiple of the battery's capacity, typically in units of "C". The general formula to calculate the maximum discharge or charge current (I) based on the C rating [6] is as follows:

$$I \ (mA) = \mathbb{C} - \text{rating} \times \text{Capacity of the battery } (mAh) \tag{1}$$

The heat generation rates or the wattage ratings for different discharge rates are taken from Choudhari et al. [7]. The heat generation rates are shown in Table 1.

**Table 1.** Heat generation rates corresponding to C ratings. Adapted with permission from Ref. [7]. 2020, Elsevier Ltd.


The cells are placed with 250 g of RT-42 fully submersed into the PCM. The system is given the heat generation rates of 3C to study the change in the heating curve for the cell. The PCM temperature is measured using 6 K type thermocouples placed at different heights and spacing uniformly, which will average out the PCM temperature, giving the melt fraction. The K-type thermocouple has an accuracy of ±2.2 ◦C. The experiment time is set to be 6000 s; however, the experiment would be truncated if the cell temperature increases the threshold of 50 ◦C.

#### **3. Results**

In the case of cells placed in natural convection, the rate of change of cell temperature was very high, and it crossed the benchmark temperature of 45 ◦C at 306 s. The naturally cooled experiment was truncated at 411 s when the temperature exceeded 50 ◦C. In the case of cells placed in RT-42, the comparison in Figure 2a shows that the benchmark temperature of 45 ◦C was achieved in 1495 s and the maximum temperature achieved in 6000 s was 56.365 ◦C; however, the cell in an actual scenario would discharge much sooner, and the temperatures would remain under 50 ◦C.

**Figure 2.** (**a**) Temperature–time curve for cells placed in natural convection vs. PCM. (**b**) Temperature– time curve for cell and PCM temperature.

The comparison of PCM and cell temperature is shown in Figure 2b which illustrates that although the PCM prolongs the time to reach the upper limit of the optimal temperature 45 ◦C, it does not throttle the cell temperature very effectively. The rate of change of cell temperature is more than the rate of change of PCM temperature, which results in a rise in overall cell temperature.

Figure 3 shows the melting fraction between the solidus temperature of 38 ◦C and the liquidus temperature of 43 ◦C, as provided by the datasheet from OEM for RT-42. The trends show that the melting slowed down due to the low thermal conductivity of PCM, and the heat started to accumulate. The corresponding cell temperature when melting starts at 1180 s is 43.43 ◦C, and the melt fraction is 4%. At 2500 s, when the melt fraction is 49.167%, the cell temperature is 47.095 ◦C, which is above the maximum optimal temperature of 45 ◦C. This means that due to heat accumulation, although the PCM is melting due to a weak thermal network and no external enhancement for heat transfer from cell to PCM, the cell temperature keeps rising, and the effectiveness of the systems reduces. Finally, a melting fraction of 100% is achieved at 3280 s, where the cell temperature is 48.07 ◦C.

**Figure 3.** Liquid fraction trends for cells placed in PCM.

#### **4. Discussion**

The analysis performed showed that a 79.53% increase in the operating time was observed staying under the maximum optimal temperature for the cells, which was 45 ◦C. The time range from 1490 s to 6000 s in the case of cells placed in PCM showed that the temperature rise slowed down but crossed 50 ◦C at 4270 s. The effectiveness of the cooling through PCM dropped when the melting region moved away from the surface of the cell, and the heat started to accumulate around the cell. This is due to the 0.2 W/m-K thermal conductivity value of the PCM. So, beyond a certain point, the rate of change in temperature increased. The solution to this problem is the addition of fins and their optimization while keeping the mass of PCM constant. Another way the thermal conductivity of the PCM can be enhanced is through ongoing research for experimentation.

**Author Contributions:** Methodology, Experimental Analysis, and Writing—Original Draft: S.A. Editing, Review, and Investigation: M.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** The research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **References**

