*Review* **A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes**

**Muhamed Rasit Atelge 1,\*, Halil Senol 2, Mohammed Djaafri 3, Tulin Avci Hansu 4, David Krisa 5, Abdulaziz Atabani 6,\*, Cigdem Eskicioglu 5, Hamdi Muratçobano ˘glu 7, Sebahattin Unalan 6, Slimane Kalloum 8, Nuri Azbar <sup>9</sup> and Hilal Demir Kıvrak <sup>10</sup>**


**Abstract:** Biogas is one of the most attractive renewable resources due to its ability to convert waste into energy. Biogas is produced during an anaerobic digestion process from different organic waste resources with a combination of mainly CH4 (~50 mol/mol), CO2 (~15 mol/mol), and some trace gasses. The percentage of these trace gases is related to operating conditions and feedstocks. Due to the impurities of the trace gases, raw biogas has to be cleaned before use for many applications. Therefore, the cleaning, upgrading, and utilization of biogas has become an important topic that has been widely studied in recent years. In this review, raw biogas components are investigated in relation to feedstock resources. Then, using recent developments, it describes the cleaning methods that have been used to eliminate unwanted components in biogas. Additionally, the upgrading processes are systematically reviewed according to their technology, recovery range, and state of the art methods in this area, regarding obtaining biomethane from biogas. Furthermore, these upgrading methods have been comprehensively reviewed and compared with each other in terms of electricity consumption and methane losses. This comparison revealed that amine scrubbing is one the most promising methods in terms of methane losses and the energy demand of the system. In the section on biogas utilization, raw biogas and biomethane have been assessed with recently available data from the literature according to their usage areas and methods. It seems that biogas can be used as a biofuel to produce energy via CHP and fuel cells with high efficiency. Moreover, it is able to be utilized in an internal combustion engine which reduces exhaust emissions by using biofuels. Lastly, chemical production such as biomethanol, bioethanol, and higher alcohols are in the development stage for utilization of biogas and are discussed in depth. This review reveals that most biogas utilization approaches are in their early stages. The gaps that require further investigations in the field have been identified and highlighted for future research.

**Keywords:** biofuels; biogas components; purification; utilization of biogas

**Citation:** Atelge, M.R.; Senol, H.; Djaafri, M.; Hansu, T.A.; Krisa, D.; Atabani, A.; Eskicioglu, C.; Muratçobano ˘glu, H.; Unalan, S.; Kalloum, S.; et al. A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes. *Sustainability* **2021**, *13*, 11515. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su132011515

Academic Editor: Idiano D'Adamo

Received: 10 September 2021 Accepted: 11 October 2021 Published: 18 October 2021

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Copyright:** © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

#### **1. Introduction**

The bioeconomy is a new approach economy model that produces energy, food, and materials from renewable biological resources [1]. Bioenergy, which is produced from biomass, may be used in any energy industry, such as electricity and transport. The circular bioeconomy has become more competitive with conventional production pathways every day. The productivity of resources, especially bioenergy, has been shown to affect economic growth [2]. As a result, it is clear that the expansion of the bioenergy business aids the reduction in pollution and unemployment [3]. Several authors have concluded that bioenergy has a significant role to play in the decarbonization of society. In this context, it is critical to widen and deepen investigations of bioenergy materials that could be employed to aid in the attainment of sustainability objectives [4]. D'Adamo et al. [1] has explained and highlighted very well the future trend of renewable energy resources and especially their sustainability aspect with new concepts definitions. Renewable energies are critical components of the energy revolution, which aims to replace fossil fuel production with renewable energy [1]. Biomasses, when compared to other green sources such as wind, photovoltaic, and hydropower, can have the greatest influence in this context. Biomasses are suitable for use in local energy supply and consumption systems. This means that energy production from locally sourced biomass is far more sustainable than energy production from biomass sourced from other areas, sometimes even across national borders [1]. This practice must be closely monitored, and it must be accompanied by sustainability evaluations that justify its use. The goal is to promote the use of renewable energy sources in order to achieve circularity while maintaining an appropriate tradeoff between food production and biobased energy resource generation [1]. It is important to remember that the existing transportation industry generates a substantial amount of global emissions, and the percentage of renewable energy in this sector has not yet reached acceptable levels [1]. Among the renewable energy production pathways, biogas produced through the anaerobic digestion process is under the spotlight due to being able to answer those concerns mentioned above.

Anaerobic digestion is a series of successive biochemical reactions, namely hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis, performed under strict anaerobic conditions [5–7]. These reactions lead to a gas mixture production known as digestion gas or biogas. The primary gas of economic value among these components is methane. For this reason, the term "biogas" is an inaccurate and imprecise term, because the carbon dioxide (CO2) gas produced by aerobic decomposition is also "biogas" in a sense—just like other biogasses, it is the result of the biodegradation. However, the term "biogas" is specifically used to refer to the CH4–CO2 combustible mixture produced by the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter [8]. This biogas is made up of 45–75% methane (CH4), the remainder being mainly CO2 between 20–55%, with traces of other gaseous compounds (impurities) such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), nitrogen (N2), hydrogen (H2), oxygen (O2), and others, which are explained further in detail below. This biogas becomes flammable at methane levels greater than 45% [9–11].

Impurities appear for various reasons in raw biogas. Among them, it was found that the feedstock that is introduced into the reactor contains some impurities; these were later found in the generated biogas after the evaporation of impurities in the digester. Siloxanes are an example of such compounds. Similarly, during anaerobic digestion, impurities can likewise be formed. Ammonia and hydrogen are an example of such impurities. Additionally, the temperature inside the reactor and the volatility of the compound influence the quantity that evaporates. In raw biogas, water is also found [12,13]. A good number of these impurities are malodorous, among them, there are H2S, HCl, HF, H2, CO, O2, N2, NH3, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). They are divided into organic and inorganic compounds. Organic compounds, in addition to containing methane, also include VOCs like siloxanes, iodomethane, toluene, xylenes, ethers, benzene, ketones, naphthalene, alcohols, esters, furans, and undecane. These VOCs also contain nitrogen compounds (due to degradation of protein waste), volatile fatty acids (VFAs), and volatile

sulfur compounds (VSC). Inorganic gases produced in the anaerobic digester by anoxic respiration (denitrification) are nitrous oxide (N2O) and molecular nitrogen (N2). It is also possible to produce these inorganic gases by adding some compounds to increase the alkalinity of digestion, which contain nitrates such as sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or by nonoxidative respiration during the transfer of sludge to the digester with the transfer of nitrate ions (NO3 −). Among the inorganic and the most undesirable gases, which may lead to damage to the digester equipment and are produced during anaerobic digestion, include hydrogen sulfide (H2S) along with dichlorine monoxide (Cl2O), chlorine (Cl2), chloric acid (HClO3), and hypochlorous acid (HClO). The production of H2S is due to the proteinaceous compounds containing sulfur that are transferred to the digester with the organic waste feed [6,14,15].

Depending on the subsequent use of the biogas, these impurities linked to the trace compounds must be removed. For example, some applications do not need high-quality energy, such as cooking and lighting and biofuel as biomethane for transportation. In such cases, carbon dioxide removal from biogas (upgrading) becomes unnecessary [16]. However, carbon dioxide removal when using biogas as a vehicle fuel is very necessary. Conversely, the presence of the other impurities in small quantities in the biogas damages equipment, engines, metal parts, etc., as is the case with H2S and water vapor which generate highly corrosive compounds such as H2SO4, and their presence reduces the equipment's lifespan. Therefore, these impurity types require a deep elimination from biogas before any use [17,18].

Biogas treatment usually aims to be a purifying and upgrading process. The biogas cleaning process (purification) includes firstly drying it by dewatering, then removing hydrogen sulfide, and finally removing other impurities. The upgrading process is precisely the separation of methane from carbon dioxide in the biogas to obtain higher purity methane as a biomethane. [19–21]. There are several methods for purifying and upgrading biogas. Despite its high requirements of energy and chemicals, biological, physical, and chemical methods are the most commonly used. Among these methods, there is chemical or physical adsorption with a high surface area, gas absorption, condensation, washing or scrubbing with specific liquid solvents, catalytic conversion, and membrane separation. Due to the growing demand for energy and chemicals from these technologies, biogas upgrading by biotechnological processes has experienced rapid development in recent years. The biological techniques are considered a promising alternative because of their economic competitiveness and superior environmental sustainability. This technology is based on the use of microbial consortia capable of efficient application even on a small scale. Biofiltration is one of the most important methods used in this field [22,23]. The final product is biomethane typically containing 95–99% of CH4, 1–5% of CO2, and a significantly low level of H2S [24].

After biogas cleaning and upgrading, natural gas can be replaced by the final biomethane obtained and become a direct alternative when CH4 > 96%, which is the same percentage as natural gas [25]. However, this methane level standard varies from one country to another in the European Union since it is technically a mandatory requirement according to some countries. To illustrate, if the methane content of biogas is higher than 85%, it can be injected into the natural gas grids in the Netherlands, while this percentage must reach 96% and 97% in Switzerland and Sweden, respectively [25]. It can be compressed to be used as compressed renewable natural gas (CNG), or else liquefied to be used as liquefied renewable natural gas (LNG) [26]. Biomethane can also be used in a wide range of applications including as fuel for engines and gas turbines to generate electricity, as a conditioner for the storage and preservation of fruits and vegetables, as fuel for fuel cells, as raw materials for modern industry, for disinfection and storage of seeds, and many other uses [27–29].

The global biogas industry market has seen an accelerated increase over the last decade (2009–2019) estimated at more than 126% as reported by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Where the overall potential of the industry has increased from 46 terawatt hours (TWh) in 2009 to 91.8 TWh in 2019 [30,31]. The European Union produces 69% of this amount with 63.3 TWh. Germany produces approximately half of the biogas in the entire EU with more than 32.9 TWh followed by Italy and UK with more than 8.2 and 7.5 TWh, respectively. Moreover, there are currently 93 agricultural biogas plants in Poland and their energy production potential is 131 PJ/year [32]. Outside of the European Union, the United States produces 12.6 TWh, China produces 3.8 TWh, Thailand produces 2.6 TWh, and Turkey produces more than 2.5 TWh. The remaining countries outside of the European Union produce less than 2 TWh. The above statistics are for 2019 and were published by IRENA in 2021 [31]. In recent years, the motivation for the choice of biogasupgrading technologies is determined by local markets based on the number of existing biomethane projects [33]. The biomethane sector is mostly developed in the European Union, with Germany holding a strong position due to its decision to utilize biomethane in combined heat and power plants. Sweden, on the other hand, employs biomethane as a biofuel for public transportation [34]. Moreover, a study for biomethane feasibility reveals that when the capacity of biomethane production plants is higher than 500 m3/h, the plants show significant economic improvements in comparison to small scale plants. Additionally, the economic losses may be between EUR 370,000 and EUR 2.9 million for each year the construction or conversion of biomethane plants is postponed [34]. In the EU, there are 367 operational biomethane plants, and 178 of them which produce 8.5 TWh of biomethane annually, are located in Germany [35]. Moreover, 25 operational biomethane plants are located in the United States, six in Japan, and five in South Korea [35].

The aim of this review is to study biogas in depth, starting with the properties and components of biogas. Moreover, the study investigates impurities in biogas and the possible reasons why they exist in biogas. Afterward, the next section is focused on the elimination of these impurities as a cleaning process with recent developments. In addition, to obtain biomethane from biogas, the upgrading procedures are systematically assessed according to their state of the art technology and recovery range of methane in this area. Furthermore, various upgrading methods have been thoroughly examined and compared in terms of electricity usage of methods and their methane losses. For methane losses and system energy demand, the most promising strategy of the upgrading process was determined. Moreover, raw biogas and biomethane have been assessed with recently available data in the literature in the utilization of the biogas section. Biogas utilization pathways were investigated regarding their electrical production efficiency. Furthermore, the review reveals that biogas can be used as a biofuel for vehicles in an internal combustion engine. The usage of biogas in vehicles as a biofuel was discussed with its advantages and disadvantages. Finally, gaps in the field that needs to be investigated further have been highlighted for future research in this field.

#### **2. Biogas Properties and Components**

Biogas is produced by organic matter degradation through the anaerobic digestion process using anaerobic digesters or directly from landfills and ponds. The main biogas components are CH4 and CO2. Biogas burns easily due to the presence of methane, while the second noncombustible compound, CO2, lowers the biogas calorific value [16]. However, the biogas becomes flammable as soon as the CH4 content is greater than 45%, and a mixture of 60% CH4 and 40% CO2 is capable of keeping a steady flame with a calorific value of approximately 5340 kcal/m3 at 15 ◦C, compared to 9000 kcal/m<sup>3</sup> for pure CH4 [36]. The typical biogas properties are presented in Table 1.

Adding to its two main components (CH4 and CO2), raw biogas also contains some impurities in small amounts. These impurities appear because the production and raw biogas composition are affected by several factors including fermentation technology, operating conditions (such as pH, temperature, organic loading rate), substrate type and its organic matter concentration, collection method, etc. [29,37]. Among these impurities there is H2S (0.005–2%), NH3 (<1%), N2 (0–2%), H2 (0–4%), H2O (5–10%), VOCs (< 0.6%), CO (<0.6%), siloxanes (0–0.02%), and O2 (0–1%) [12,19,21,38,39].


**Table 1.** The properties of typical biogas from an anaerobic digestion process [40–43].

The proportion of these impurities in raw biogas is governed by several parameters. Therefore, the percentages differ from one substrate to another and differ within the same substrate if the anaerobic digestion conditions differ. For example, the percentage of H2S in raw biogas varies depending on the percentage of the proteinaceous and other sulfur compounds in the substrate [13]. Additionally, the percentage of O2 and N2 in the raw biogas varies according to the percentage of air introduced into the digester to remove the hydrogen sulfide by oxidation in certain cases, or the air entering the landfill by reducing the gas pressure in order to extract the gas in other cases. There are also other reasons for certain impurities in the the substrate, which can evaporate during the anaerobic digestion process in the reactor due to the process temperature and the component's volatile nature, such as siloxanes and H2O found in raw biogas compounds [12,15]. The typical composition of biogas generated from different origins versus natural gas is summarized in Table 2. Hereinafter, each of these impurities will be discussed separately and in depth.

#### *2.1. Carbon Dioxide*

CO2 is the second main component of biogas. During the complex degradation processes of organic materials, different types of bacteria are involved to produce biogas. CO2 is produced during some of these steps and acts as an electron acceptor for methanogenic microorganisms [13]. The percentage of this component in the biogas is influenced by temperature, pressure, and the liquid content in the digester [42]. The concentration of CO2 dissolved in water decreases with increasing temperature during the fermentation process which causes an increase in the CO2 level in the produced biogas. Unlike the other two parameters (the pressure and the liquid content in the digester), when they are higher, they lead to an increase in the concentration of CO2 dissolved in the water, which causes a decrease in the CO2 level in the produced biogas. This is considered to be beneficial for biogas [42].


**Table 2.** Composition of biogas generated from different origins versus standard biogas (EBA) and natural gas [12,44–46].

\* EBA: European biomass association.

The volumetric energy content of biogas decreases with increasing CO2 percentage. When biogas is used as fuel for vehicles, CO2 is considered an impurity; therefore, it should be removed from raw biogas. However, it can be tolerated for power and heat generation. When CO2 is mixed with water, CO2 will be transformed into carbonic acid. This formation will cause some damage to the equipment [20].

#### *2.2. Water Vapor*

The anaerobic digestion process is categorized based on humidity in the digester content, which is linked to the moisture content of the feedstock. There are two main anaerobic digestion types: wet (liquid) anaerobic digestion with a moisture content from 85% to 99.5% and dry (high solids) anaerobic digestion with humidity from 60% to 85% [47]. Accordingly, during the anaerobic digestion process, a small amount of this water evaporates to become one of the biogas components. Its proportion in the biogas is dependent on the internal digester temperature and pressure [20].

The water in raw biogas can create some problems such as corrosion of equipment and reaction with other components like CO2, NH3, and H2S to produce an acidic solution. Further, it can cause blockage of pipelines, flow meters, valves, compressors, etc., during subsequent cooling. The two phases coexist; liquid and gas cause flow oscillations which can interfere with the operations control. Moreover, water decreases the energy content and affects biogas heat value [6,13,48,49]. Briefly, water creates a negative impact on biogas utilization, so it is necessary to dry biogas before use.

#### *2.3. Hydrogen Sulfide*

Hydrogen sulfide is considered one of the most highly toxic gases as it can lead to serious risks to human health and can kill quickly (from 30 minutes to one hour) if its concentration reaches 0.05% of inhaled air [50]. It can also be used as a powerful nerve poison. When this gas combines with alkaline substances in tissues, it can form sodium sulfide and cause damage to the respiratory system and eyes. When it arrives in the bloodstream, it associates with hemoglobin which leads to nonreducible hemoglobin formation that causes toxic symptoms. Similarly, it excites human mucous in a strong way. It is quickly taken by the lungs and stomach and can cause conjunctivitis [20,50].

This gas occurs in small amounts (ppm levels) during the protein's degradation throughout the anaerobic digestion process from organically bound sulfur (S-bearing proteins). This gas production rate differs with the protein rate in the substrate entering the digester. Low rates are recorded with vegetable waste. While the highest rate comes

from protein-rich materials like molasses, which produce more than 3% by volume of H2S. However, the average rates are produced by animal waste such as poultry droppings and cattle and pig manure, with an H2S level of 0.5% and 0.3%, respectively. Usually, this gas in biogas from wastewater treatment plants is higher compared with biogas from landfills. Another source of H2S gas comes from the biochemical transformation of mineral sulfur (sulfates) to sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Sulfides are inhibitory to methanogens and can decrease methane production. Another source of H2S gas comes from the biochemical transformation. During the AD process, when the degradation of sulfur (S) compounds and the desulfurization of sulfates (SO4 <sup>2</sup>−) occur, H2S is produced. Microorganisms need SO4 2− because it is not only converted into cellular materials with enzymes but also behaves like an electron acceptor while organic matter is oxidized. If SO4 <sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup> exists inside the AD reactor, H2S is produced from H2 and SO4 <sup>2</sup>−. Sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogens compete with each other to obtain H2 in the AD reactor. In this circumstance, sulfate-reducing bacteria can dominate over methanogens due to their higher microbial growth rate, higher demand of H2, and higher energy yield during reduction [50–53]. Therefore, if sulfate is present during anaerobic digestion, the sulfate-reducing bacteria always produce H2S.

H2S is the most problematic and common impurity in raw biogas as shown in Table 3. It is a colorless gas with a strong rotten-egg smell that appears even at very low concentrations (0.05 to 500 ppm). It is inflammable. When mixed with oxygen, it forms an explosive mixture. On combustion, when it reacts with water it forms sulfur dioxide (SO2) which is a toxic material and causes the flue gas to appear corrosive due to the formation of sulfuric acid. The latter causes acid rain to precipitate which is harmful to the environment. The airborne emissions from SO2 are limited in several countries. H2S also produces weak acids when dissolved in water. At room temperature, it can produce metal sulfides by reaction with certain metal oxides such as zinc oxide and ferric oxide. It can also produce hydrosulfide or metal sulfide by reaction with alkalis. Similarly, it can produce low solubility sulfides by reaction with metal ions in liquid form except for alkali metals and ammonium. For copper compounds, this gas type is caustic. Moreover, it also damages many engines components [13,20,49,50].


**Table 3.** Impurities in biogas and their negatives impacts [13,21,22,24,25,42,53–58].

**Table 3.** *Cont.*


#### *2.4. Siloxanes*

Siloxanes are organic compounds based on a combination and repitition of silicon and oxygen atoms encircled by methyl groups. Usually they are classified as VOCs because they are degraded into volatile methyl siloxanes (VMS). The latter have a linear or cyclic structure and their degradation makes them a low molecular-weight species [42,59,60].

Siloxanes are mostly added to health care consumer products to improve lubricity. They are used in a wide range of products including cosmetics, shampoos, soaps, detergents, in industrial uses as precursors in polymeric silicone products, paints, etc. [59–61]. Most of these compounds are drained to wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) after rinsing, where they are absorbed by sludge. Since these siloxanes are resistant to biological and chemical degradation and have low solubility, they accumulate inside the sludge, making it a reservoir of siloxanes. Another reservoir for siloxanes is landfill, where most of the residues of the product containing siloxanes are disposed of [57,59,61].

While treating sludge by an anaerobic digestion process or waste in landfills, the siloxanes are present in the raw biogas as impurities. Therefore, it is expected that the amount of the siloxanes in the biogas produced from digesters that use food waste, agricultural product residues, or animal manure are much less than those produced by landfills or digesters treating sludge. Previous studies showed that the maximum amount of siloxanes expected to be found in biogas produced from landfills is from 4 to 9 ppm, while this percentage exceeds 41 ppm in biogas from digesters treating sludge [27,53].

As mentioned above, the siloxanes present in raw biogas are problematic impurities. As this affects the biogas performance as an energy source, it also affects the equipment used during energy production. Whereas during the biogas combustion process, oxygen reacts with the VMS under high temperature and pressure, the white SiO2 deposits are formed in different morphological forms (white, glassy, crystal, microcrystalline, and amorphous deposits) [62,63]. In some cases, these deposits are associated with other components like calcium or sulfur [64]. These deposits can generate abrasive and thermal insulating properties, that can cause damage to turbines, reduce engine life and efficiency, and cause damage to their accessories such as valves, engine heads, and spark plugs. Additionally, these deposits may cause explosions in the combustion chambers, poisoning of catalysts, and may blocks pipes. For that, in raw biogas, the recommended siloxanes limit is 0.2 mg m<sup>−</sup>3, and in some industries, the strict rule is <0.1 mg/m3 [42,57,59,65].

#### *2.5. Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, and Oxygen*

Nitrogen and oxygen are generally absent in the reactor because of anaerobic conditions. If nitrogen is detected in raw biogas, it is a strong sign of denitrification or air leakage in the reactor. Additionally, among the existing causes of nitrogen compounds in biogas, the main cause is the release of nitrogen compounds after the bacterial reduction of proteins in the reducing medium which are subsequently transformed into ammonia [20,49]. Biogas produced from organic or agricultural waste digesters generally contains a low nitrogen proportion (usually 0.1%) compared to that produced from landfills (mostly from 5% to

15%) [66]. On the contrary, aqueous ammonia could be used for biogas purification and upgrading by absorbing H2S and CO2 [67]. A recent study demonstrates a significant positive effect of ammonia nitrogen on biogas upgrading. With 5500 mg/L of ammonia nitrogen, the CH4 content in biogas reached 94.1% [68].

A small amount of oxygen is found in raw biogas produced from anaerobic digestion, because oxygen will react with H2S or be consumed by facultative anaerobic bacteria at the start of the anaerobic digestion process, and oxygen itself will not be detected. Similarly, landfill gas extraction leads to low internal pressure, which causes some air absorption [20,42,69]. The oxygen could cause an explosion if the CH4 content is 60% in biogas and the air reaches a range between 8.5% and 20.7% at 25 ◦C [42]. Additionally, oxygen can lead to flammable mixture formation [20]. Therefore, the ratio of air should be carefully adjusted. An oxygen amount of 1% to 2% is cited as ideal [70]. Likewise, a 4:1 nitrogen to oxygen ratio in raw biogas is mentioned as ideal [8].

#### *2.6. Volatile Organic Compounds*

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) exist in trace amounts in biogas. They are divided into different chemical families such as aromatics, alkanes, alcohols, halogens, sulfur compounds (excluding hydrogen sulfide), carbonyls, and siloxanes [9,53]. These compounds' type and concentrations in biogas depend on the substrate's origin. For example, a very low concentration of these compounds was recorded in farm digester biogas. On the contrary, this concentration increased in the gases produced by wastewater, household waste, and landfills [71]. Materials that produce these components include cleaning compounds, cosmetic products, silicon compounds, lacquers, foaming agents, pharmaceuticals, aggregates, adhesives, solvents, pesticides, synthetic plastics, propellants, textiles, coatings, etc. [66,72]. The concentration increase of these compounds in biogas is attributed to direct emission from the substrate or to the volatilization after the compounds' degradation (complex molecules) and their transformation into low molecular mass. Consequently, the VOCs measured in biogas at the start of digestion come essentially from direct volatilization, while the concentration of those measured after a certain duration of digestion in biogas are dictated by the substrate biodegradation rate [9].

Despite their low concentration in raw biogas (usually 1% by volume), just like hydrogen sulfide, VOCs lead to equipment problems and negative environmental effects such as greenhouse gases, groundwater contaminants, and disagreeable odor, and they can affect human health [9,73]. For example, acids can be formed during halogenated hydrocarbons combustion (in the presence of water) such as hydrofluoric acid (HF) or hydrochloric acid (HCl) which can cause acidification, premature equipment degradation, and corrosion of materials and catalytic surfaces [20,72]. Similarly, organochloride in biogas can lead to combustion-engine corrosion, and silicon and chloride compounds make landfill gas as vehicle fuel much more expensive and often too complicated [52,66]. Generally, VOC accumulation affects the proper functioning of systems for converting biogas into energy; for this reason, their contents in biogas must be carefully controlled.

#### *2.7. Particulates*

Several researchers have reported the presence of particulates (dust) in raw biogas produced from digestion or landfills. This can lead to mechanical damage to gas turbines and gas engines due to their abrasive properties, or cause blockages when they deposit in the gas storage tank and compressor. They can also form condensation nuclei of water droplets [6,20,45,74,75]. For these reasons, the total content of particles and aerosols in the biogas must be maintained under 0.01 mg/m<sup>3</sup> [56,69].

#### **3. Current Biogas Purification Technologies**

In this section, the latest technologies for the improvement and upgrade of biogas and the resulting biological methanation processes are summarized. This paper examines the main principles of various upgrade methods, the technical and scientific features/consequences for biomethanation efficiency, the challenges that need to be addressed for further improvement, and the applicability of upgrade concepts.

As mentioned in the previous section, the ratio of CH4 and CO2 in the biogas is mostly in the range of 50–70% and 30–50%, respectively, depending partly on the organic content and pH of the substrate. [19]. In addition to CH4 and CO2 gases, biogas may contain N2 gas in the concentration range of 0–3% depending on the volume of the head space at the start of gas production in the reactors [76]. The most important minor components are carbon monoxide (CO), O2, hydrogen sulfide, H2, and NH3 [29]. Depending on the substrate source in the reactors, biogas may contain other contaminants such as siloxanes (0–41 mg Si/m3), volatile hydrocarbons (alcohols, fatty acids, terpenes) or fluorinated hydrocarbons, chlorinated, heavy metal vapors, and aromates [77].

All gases except CH4 contained in biogas are undesirable gases and are known as biogas pollutants. For the biogas purification process, the first step is biogas cleaning and the second step is biogas upgrading. Biogas cleaning is performed to remove harmful or toxic components such as H2S, Si, CO, siloxanes, VOCs, and NH3 [19]. The second step, biogas upgrading, aims to increase the calorific value of biogas and convert it to a fuel standard. In addition, biogas upgrading is a multistage gas-separation process that involves the separation of CO2 gas, drying the gas to remove moisture content, and extracting and compressing other small components [77]. In order for biogas to be used in different applications, its methane content must be at least 90% (*v*/*v*) [17]. Upgraded biogas that has a 95% (*v*/*v*) methane content is called biomethane [78].

#### *3.1. Carbon Dioxide Removal*

Almost all of the noncombustible portion of biogas is CO2 gas, and this reduces the calorific value per unit volume of biogas. This limits biogas for uses such as biofuel for transportation, cooking, and lighting, etc., where direct combustion technology is needed. CO2 creates disadvantages such as the extra space occupied in the biogas storage area and the use of extra energy in the compression of the biogas. Dry ice is formed as a result of the compression of biogas with CO2 and this creates the problems of lump formation and freezing in valves or measurement points. This makes it difficult to store biogas in containers for transportation and limits its use. For such reasons, the removal of CO2 in biogas gains importance in terms of its use in larger scales [17].

Various commercial technologies are available to separate CO2 from biogas. The higher solubility of CO2 in water than CH4 gas enables them to be separated from each other by taking advantage of the difference in their solubility in water. At 25 ◦C, the solubility of CO2 in water is 26 times higher than the water solubility of CH4. Biomethane containing 95–99% (*v*/*v*) CH4 can be obtained as a result of the separation process in this way [21]. Water scrubbing is one of the most common methods used for biogas cleaning [19]. Figure 1 shows a schematic of a process flow diagram of a recirculating water scrubber. Biogas is sent to the absorption column by pressurizing from the bottom (6–10 bar) and water is supplied from the top of the column at the same time. The absorption column used is filled with random packaging material in order to work more effectively [21]. The saturated water is transferred to the flash tank where the pressure is dropped to around three bars to minimalize methane loss. The water leaves the flash tank and goes to the desorption column. Air is taken into the desorption tank due to increasing the driving force for CO2 desorption by decreasing its partial pressure. A 1000 Nm3/h raw biogas water scrubber upgrading system needs to circulate 200 m3/h water at 8 bars of pressure at 20 ◦C [79]. The benefit of the water scrubber is that H2S can be eliminated with the removal of CO2 because the solubility of H2S in water is higher than CO2. If the H2S is removed with CO2 at the same time, the water quality can decrease rapidly, therefore, using fresh water is recommended. The upgrading system has some advantages such as being economical, having high efficiency, not requiring additional chemicals, and gaining a high level of methane recovery above 97% [75]. However, the high initial investment and high energy demand during water regeneration are the primary drawbacks of the system.

**Figure 1.** The schematic flow chart of a recirculating water scrubber (adapted from [79]).

By choosing a washing liquid that is more effective than water in the separation of CO2 and CH4 in biogas, further improvement of absorption can be achieved. In this context, the most commonly used chemicals are aqueous solutions of amines such as diethanolamine, methyldiethanolamine, monoethanolamine, and diglycolamine [21]. Such biogas-boosting methods are also called amine scrubbing. Figure 2 shows a schematic of biogas upgrading by amine scrubbing of CO2. The raw biogas enters the absorption tank from the bottom, and amine solvent enters through the top of the tank. During the counter-current flow, CO2 reacts with the amine solvent. During the reaction, the temperature increases from between 20–40 ◦C to between 45–65 ◦C due to an exothermic reaction [80]. Generally, an increase in the temperature decreases the solubility of materials but the solubility of CO2 in amine solvent increases with an increase in temperature [75]. After the reaction, the liquid goes to the heat exchanger to increase its temperature and is boiled at 120–150 ◦C. This is the regeneration step of amine solvent, as CO2 is released from the amine solution. Recovery of CH4 is higher than 99% due to the sensitivity of the reaction with CO2 but methane loss may increase up to 4% because of dissolution in amine [81]. While the system has high sensitivity and low operational costs, the high initial investment and significant energy demand for regeneration of amine are some of its drawbacks [75]. By using these chemicals as solvents in the liquid phase, an extremely low CH4 adsorption is provided and CH4 recovery is achieved at a rate of approximately 99.95% [77]. In addition, the need for a lower operating pressure in the absorption processes with these chemicals compared to all other biogasupgrading technologies makes these technologies advantageous. In many amine washing plants, only one blower is used instead of a compressor, and this significantly reduces the electrical energy requirement. However, a disadvantage of amine scrubbing is the possible oxidative or thermal degradation of amine solutions. This increases the chemical consumption, corrosion potential, and emission potential of hazardous decomposition products [82].

Another method of separation of CO2 and CH4 is the adsorption of gas molecules to a solid surface. The adsorbent solid surfaces used for this process are porous materials with highly specific surface areas. The other name of this technique is pressure swing adsorption (PSA). This technique enables the selective separation of biogas by using different adsorption equilibria that adsorb larger amounts of CO2 or different adsorption

kinetics that adsorb CH4 faster than CO2. The adsorbent materials used for this technique are titanosilicates, zeolites, silica gels, activated carbon, and carbon molecular sieves [24,83]. In the adsorption process to the solid surface, the water vapour in the biogas must be preseparated in order to prevent potential poisoning of the adsorbent material [29]. In addition, the pressure of the biogas fed must be 10 bar in order to provide sufficient driving force in this adsorption process. This method is able to adsorb N2 and O2 simultaneously with CO2. The technology is well developed and commercially available in the market with various range capacities between 10 and 10,000 m3/h [75]. The flow chart is shown in Figure 3. In this process, there are four vertical columns that are used for adsorption, depressurization, desorption, and pressurization sequences. CH4 recovery can be around 98–99% as a result of solid surface adsorption processes. The biggest advantage of this technology is that it enables N2, O2 and CO2 to be separated from raw biogas at the same time [29]. However, it is a disadvantage that the active sites on the adsorbent material used in adsorption separation technologies are blocked by NH3 and H2S gases [58]. Additionally, the process efficiency can be influenced by impurities of raw biogas. Additionally, 2–4% of CH4 is lost during the process and reduction in this loss should recirculate the output of gases into the PSA system [24].

**Figure 2.** The schematic flow chart of chemical amine scrubbing (adapted from [24]).

Electrical swing adsorption (ESA) [84] and temperature swing adsorption (TSA) [85] are other swing adsorption methods. Temperature increases at constant pressure in the TSA process; therefore, thermal energy is required for the regeneration of the adsorbent material [86]. In an ESA process, the current passes through the saturated adsorbents for regeneration, so that CO2 is released from adsorbents as a result of heat generation by the Joule-heating phenomena. Even though the operating cost of ESA is lower than TSA and PSA, conductive adsorbent is needed. Activated carbon is a promising adsorbent due to its semiconductor properties with large surface area and porous structure [87].

**Figure 3.** The schematic flow chart of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) (adapted from [24]).

Another biogas-upgrading technique is membrane-based gas permeability, and this technology has gained increasing importance in recent years [88]. This technique is based on different solubilities of gas types in particular membrane materials [89]. Figure 4 shows a schematic of process design for a membrane upgrading process. Biogas is fed into the membrane module at pressures of 5–30 bar [90]. Gas types with higher permeability in biogas preferably pass the membrane to the low-pressure permeable side, while gas types with lower permeability accumulate on the high-pressure side and leave the membrane module as a retentate. One of the challenges at membrane systems is energy demand to maintain pressure for separation, further studies should be conducted to reduce pressure demand. The most commonly used membrane materials in this technique are polysulphone, polyimide, and cellulose acetate [88]. It is a cheap membrane because of its cellulose-based material with good CO2–CH4 sensitivity. However, a cellulose acetate (CA) membrane has low plasticization pressure around 8 bars because CO2 can be dissolved in the matrix of the membrane due to its OH−-rich structure [91]. The membrane separation technique provides up to 99.5% CH4 recovery and provides biomethane quality containing at least 99% CH4, especially when membrane modules are used sequentially [92]. As a result, polymeric material-based membranes are heavily used in raw biogas separation. This method is advantageous in terms of its robustness, ease of use, lack of need for chemicals, flexibility of scaling up, low operating costs, low initial investment costs, low energy demand, and compact design [58]. Moreover, it should be considered that while CH4 is separated from biogas by membrane systems, another valuable and biologically produced product, CO2, is also separated from biogas for further usage. The main challenge is the relationship between permeability and selectivity. Therefore, a low permeable membrane is used together with a low selectivity one [75].

Inorganic membranes have excellent thermal stability, mechanical strength, and resistance against chemicals compared to organic membranes. The membranes are made from different materials such as zeolite, silica, activated carbon, metal-organic framework, and carbon nanotubes [75]. The most difficult part is to produce a defect-free structure for an inorganic membrane because the fabrication process requires continuous monitoring and a small mistake can create a defect due to their very fragile structure [93]. The defects in the structure are closely related to the sensitivity of membranes.

Considering that biogas components liquefy or sublimate at different temperatures, they can be used to remove impurities from biogas by the cryogenic separation method. Cryogenic separation is a technique that relies on the liquefaction of gases under different temperatures and pressures. Biogas is cooled down to −55 ◦C, and moisture, NH3, and H2S are removed and CO2 is separated as a liquid in the last step [21]. CO2 can be removed

in solid form through sublimation when the temperature is decreased at −85 ◦C. With this technique, the CH4 content of the gas phase at equilibrium is higher than 97% (*v*/*v*). Since cooling for purification is synergistic with cooling for liquefaction, this technique is particularly valuable in the case of producing liquefied biomethane. The process is run at a temperature of −170 ◦C and under a pressure of 80 bars, which requires several compressors and heat exchangers [75]. In addition, other gasses such as N2, O2 and siloxanes in raw biogas can be separated. After this process, the final product is liquid biomethane which is free of N2 and O2 and is equivalent to liquid natural gas. The cryogenic separation method can produce not only over 97% pure biomethane in liquid form, but also the marketable liquid form of CO2 [76,94]. The schematic flow chart of the cryogenic separation of biogas is shown in Figure 5.

**Figure 4.** The schematic flow chart of a membrane separation process (adapted from [79]).

**Figure 5.** The schematic flow chart of the cryogenic separation of biogas (adapted from [24]).

Although the cryogenic separation method has promising results, it is still in development and operates on a commercial scale for only a few facilities. High investment and operating costs, and CH4 losses and blockage due to solid CO2 are a few of the problems that limit the use of this technique [19].

#### *3.2. Biological Techniques for CO2 Removal*

Biological upgrade techniques can be classified as photosynthetic and chemoautotrophic. Most of these techniques have proven themselves in the experimental stage for being the early stage of full-scale applications. These technologies contribute to sustainable cyclic energy recovery by converting CO2 into other energy-containing products (i.e., CH4, H2, etc.). CO2 in biogas is converted to CH4 using H2, according to the chemoautotrophic upgrade method (Reaction (1)).

$$\text{4H}\_2 + \text{CO}\_2 \rightarrow \text{CH}\_4 + \text{H}\_2\text{O} \quad \Delta \text{G}^0 = -130.7 \text{ K/mol} \tag{1}$$

H2 gas should be obtained from renewable energy sources. For this, water is hydrolyzed and the remaining electrical energy can be provided by windmills or solar panels for this hydrolysis [95]. With the electrolysis of water made using this energy, water is divided into O2 and H2. However, the low volumetric energy density is a disadvantage that makes it difficult to store the H2 gas produced by this method [95]. The low initial investment costs are due to the fact that CH4 has an energy of 36 MJ/m3, H2 has an energy greater than 10.88 MJ/m3, and the existing possibilities of the biogas plant are used in the improvement processes which make this technology advantageous [96].

H2 gas-assisted biogas upgrade methods exist in three different forms: ex situ, in situ, and hybrid design techniques (Figure 6).

In the in situ concept, H2, externally added to anaerobic digester is converted to CH4 by combining with CO2 in the digester and by the action of autochthonous methanogenic archaea [97]. The biggest disadvantage of this technology is that it reduces the activity of the methanogenesis stage by increasing the pH value to above 8.5 in the biogas process. CO2 gas is decomposed into H<sup>+</sup> and HCO3 − as shown in Reaction (2). Thus, the use of CO2 causes a reduction in H<sup>+</sup> gas and causes an increase in the pH of the environment.

$$\rm H\_2O + CO\_2 \rightarrow H^+ + HCO\_3^- \tag{2}$$

In order to overcome this difficulty, it has been proposed that codigestion with acidic wastes can stop the pH increase [98]. Luo and Angelida [98] used hollow fiber membranes to inject H2 into an anaerobic reactor that processes cattle manure and whey in a continuously fed reactor and obtained methane gas containing 96% CH4. In another study, a hollow fiber membrane in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor was placed in an external degassing unit, and biomethane containing 94% CH4 was obtained from the in situ biogas upgrade process [99].

The ex situ biogas upgrade method is the process of transforming products into CH4 by supplying H2 and CO2 externally to a secondary vessel containing hydrogenotrophic culture outside the main anaerobic digester, as shown in Figure 6 [97]. This method has some advantages over in situ methods. These advantages include the benefit of the secondary vessel which makes the biochemical process simpler due to the absence of organic substrate degradation and makes the process independent of biomass. With this method, biomethane efficiency can be between 79–98%. This yield may vary according to digester types. For example, 98–99% purity biomethane can be obtained due to the formation of a biofilm of a mixed anaerobic consortium, which acts as a good biocatalyst of a trickle bed reactor [100]. As a result, ex situ and in situ processes have taken their place among the hydrogen gas-assisted biogas upgrade techniques in the literature with their experimental results, but the hybrid design technique is currently in the developmental stage and the results of this technology will soon begin to emerge.

**Figure 6.** Hybrid, in situ, and ex situ biological upgrading technologies (adapted from [19]).

Another alternative method of CO2 separation is the photosynthetic biogas uptake technique. In addition to CO2, H2S is also removed with this method and >54% CO2 is removed. The biomethane production efficiency of photoautotrophic techniques can increase up to 97%, depending on the digester type and substrate. Closed systems are advantageous due to their low land and water requirements and high photosynthetic performance. However, open photobioreactors differ from closed systems in that they require fewer resources for construction and processing, have low photosynthetic CO2 removal, and have high natural-resource requirements. In the biogas-upgrading process, biogas is directly injected into photobioreactors, and then photoautotrophic microorganisms can efficiently take up O2 and CO2 to generate heat. Thus, up to 2–6% CO2 can be found in the upgraded biogas and the CH4 ratio increases [101].

Various microalgae or cyanobacteria with high photosynthetic activity have been used to raise biogas quality. The most common of these are *Spirulina, Chlorella, and Arthrospira* [76]. Using microalgae to reduce the CO2 component in raw biogas has taken place successfully and achieved up to 97.07% of CO2 removal [102]. Another approach is indirectly upgrading biogas with microalgae as claimed by Chi et al. [103], which is a novel technique and was suggested as a two-step process to upgrade biogas while avoiding the risk of explosion. In the first step, biogas was passed through a carbonate solution to capture CO2 as a bicarbonate form. The second step is the regeneration of the carbonate solution. Figure 7 demonstrates direct and indirect biogas upgrading with microalgae.

#### *3.3. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide*

H2S is another common component of raw biogas. Its quantity is between 100 and 10,000 ppm and the variation depends on the substrate combination [24]. If the substrate is rich in protein content, H2S production will be high. Due to its negative effects such as causing the corrosion of pipes, pumps, and engines, it has to be cleaned before upgrading to biomethane or any other use of biogas. H2S can be transformed into SO2 and sulphuric acid (H2SO4) which increase environmental concerns and corrosion risk.

**Figure 7.** The schematic flow chart of (**a**) direct and (**b**) indirect upgrading biogas using microalgae (adapted from [104]).

The simplest desulphurisation methods are accomplished by introducing pure oxygen or air into the gas phase or adding iron hydroxides or chlorides to the liquid phase [21]. The addition of iron hydroxides or chlorides to the liquid phase causes ferrous sulfide formation and precipitation and can significantly reduce the concentration of H2S in the gas phase. O2 added to the gas phase is consumed by *Thiobacillus* bacteria along with the oxidation of H2S to elemental sulphur deposited on surfaces or absorbed by the slurry [105]. These techniques create minimum additional operating and investment costs but can provide removal of 80–99% H2S concentrations. However, it is known to be less efficient in obtaining stable and low sulphur contents required for biomethane production. The disadvantages of the method are that oxygen can affect the anaerobic digestion process negatively if too much air is injected. Additionally, the remaining nitrogen could be a problem for future processes. For example, it is difficult to upgrade by separating nitrogen and methane [106]. Application to filter reactors is commonly used on the output of the biogas pipe. With this method, combinations of H2S in raw biogas can achieve a range of 50–100 ppm [107].

The oldest technique used in the removal of H2S from biogas is scrubbing with chemically active liquids. The most used scrubbing chemicals are sodium hydroxide (NaOH), calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), iron (II) chloride, iron (III) hydroxide, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and monoethanolamine [108–110]. Ca(OH)2 and NaOH allow for the formation of sulphurous salts. It has been reported that with these techniques, 90–100% cleansing is normally achieved. The biggest disadvantages of chemical upgrading techniques are the necessity and high costs of using chemicals [108]. In this method, Fe3+/EDTA catalyst is used where the reaction product is elemental sulphur. During the reaction, Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ as shown in Reaction (3). The regeneration process is represented in Reactions (4) and (5) [24]. During the H2S cleaning process, a small amount of Fe3+/EDTA solution is used for the regeneration step. H2S removal of 90-100% is achieved when raw biogas and solution flow rates are 1 dm3/min and 83.6 cm3/min, respectively [21].

$$2\text{S}^{2-} + 2\text{F}^{3+} \rightarrow \text{S} + 2\text{Fe}^{2+} \tag{3}$$

$$\text{O}\_2 + 2\text{H}\_2\text{O} \to \text{O}\_2\tag{4}$$

$$0.5\text{O}\_2 + 2\text{Fe}^{2+} \rightarrow 2\text{Fe}^{3+} + 2\text{OH}^- \tag{5}$$

H2S can be separated from biogas by adsorption in hydroxides or metal oxides, and the most commonly used chemicals are iron, zinc and copper oxides [21]. At the end of this process, sulphur binds as metal sulphur and is released into the gas thanks to a mild endothermic reaction.

The membrane separation technique can also be applied to separate H2S from biogas [111]. However, it should be noted that the efficiency of H2S removal will be limited when glassy polymeric material is used only for bulk CO2 removal. High CH4/H2S separation can be achieved by selecting a special, rubbery, polymeric membrane material. This technique is very attractive for biogas with H2S content higher than 2% [112].

High-pressure water washing (HPWS) is a biogas-boosting technology that is frequently used industrially [113]. Water is used for single-pass absorption; however, without a regeneration step, the process has high water consumption [24]. Therefore, it prefers a small absorption tank volume. This method is more efficient for smaller concentrations of H2S or combinations of CO2 removal. As shown in Figure 8, the adsorption process occurs in a high pressure (6–10 bar) column in which the biogas is washed with an HPWS and biomethane exiting the top of the column is obtained. A disadvantage of this technique is that it is affected by higher water consumption than other adsorbing techniques [114].

**Figure 8.** The schematic flow chart of water scrubbing of H2S (adopted from [24]).

H2S removal from biogas can be achieved using adsorption to activated carbons impregnated with potassium iodide or H2SO4 or not impregnated (untreated) [24]. For this, 4–6% O2 must be added to the biogas to reduce H2S to elemental sulphur (Reaction 6) [21].

$$2\text{H}\_2\text{S} + \text{O}\_2 \rightarrow 2\text{S} + 2\text{H}\_2\text{O} \tag{6}$$

The temperature required for this reaction to occur is 50–70 ◦C and the required pressure is 7–8 bar. As seen in Figure 9, the elemental sulphur obtained is adsorbed by activated carbon. To improve the reaction rate, adsorption is done by impregnating the activated carbon with an oxide or alkali such as sodium potassium iodine, potassium hydroxide and potassium permanganate. This process can increase the H2S removal from 10–20 kg H2S/m3 to 120–140 kg H2S/m3 [115].

While this technology has advantages such as high H2S cleaning efficiency and high purity, it has disadvantages such as the need for replacing activated carbon instead of regeneration when the solid is saturated with sulphur, increasing environmental concerns about proper disposal methods (such as creating waste oxygen), and removing dust and water prior to activated carbon treatment [76].

**Figure 9.** PSA technique flow chart for H2S removal (adapted from [24]).

#### *3.4. Biological Techniques for Removal of H2S*

Biological oxidation can be performed ex situ in a distinct apparatus with packed bed scrubbers or trickling beds [21]. H2S is absorbed in a liquid film and bio-oxidized to sulfur or sulfate. Washing liquid is drained and replaced if the pH falls below the threshold level. O2 should be dosed as pure air or as pure O2 (Reactions 7 and 8). Although the separation performance of this technique is effective, the fact that H2S levels of less than 100 ppm cannot be reached continuously for the remaining O2 content prevents the continuous application of this technique in biomethane production [109].

$$\text{H}\_2\text{S} + 0.5\text{O}\_2 \rightarrow \text{S} + \text{H}\_2\text{O} \tag{7}$$

$$\text{H}\_2\text{S} + 2\text{O}\_2 \rightarrow \text{SO}\_4^{2-} + 2\text{H}^+ \tag{8}$$

In addition to this technique, it has been reported in the literature that NO3 can be used as an electron acceptor instead of O2 for H2S oxidation in the biofiltration unit (Reactions 9 and 10) [116].

$$\rm 3H\_2S + NO\_3^- \rightarrow 3S + 0.5N\_2 + 3H\_2O \tag{9}$$

$$\rm 3H\_2S + 4NO\_3^- \rightarrow 3SO\_4^{2-} + 2N\_2 + 6H^+ \tag{10}$$

The sulphur-oxidizing microorganisms used here belong to the *Thiomonas*, *Thiobacillus*, *Acidithiobacillus*, *Paracoccus*, *Halothiobacillus* or *Sulfurimonas* genera [117]. This technique has been mainly applied in a biotrickling filter due to its low cost and nutrient requirement.

With this technology, the H2S concentration can be reduced from 3000–5000 ppm to 50–100 ppm, and at the same time, NH3 is removed. In the biotic filter, HD-QPAC, pall rings or polyurethane foam are used as filled bed column materials for H2S removal [24,76].

#### *3.5. Removal of Other Compounds*

#### 3.5.1. Removal of Siloxanes

SiO2 deposits in the spark plug, cylinder head, and combustion chamber which can cause damage to the engine. Maximum siloxane concentrations in biogas should be between 0.03 and 28 mg/m<sup>3</sup> according to engine manufactures [21]. A study showed that while most siloxanes can be eliminated with long carbon-chain organic solvents, they can be completely removed with chemical absorption [118]. Removal of 95% of the siloxane concentration at 60 ◦C was achieved using a combination of sulphuric acid and nitric acid at 480 and 650 L/m3, respectively [118]. In addition, selexol can be used to remove at least 98% of siloxane in biogas plants [119].

Using silica gel is another method and experimental reports show that its removal capacity is higher than activated carbon; however, using silica gel may only be effective in large-scale uses [21].

The activated carbon adsorption method can be used for siloxane removal from biogas. The siloxane adsorption efficiency of this method depends on the adsorption capacity, physicochemical properties, and microporous volumes of the activated carbon [120]. Schweigkofler and Niessner [118] have reported on using different types of adsorbents such as activated carbon, polymer beads, silica gel, and molecular sieves for siloxane removal, and found that they exhibit good adsorption capacity. The cryogenic separation method is another advantageous technology. With the cryogenic separation method, siloxane concentrations can be removed from raw biogas at 12%, 25.9%, 90%, and 99.3% at temperatures of 5 ◦C, −25 ◦C, −30 ◦C, and −70 ◦C, respectively. The initial investment and operating costs of any technique involving cryogenation are higher than other adsorption methods such as activated carbon [121].

The membrane separation technique can alternatively be used to remove siloxanes from biogas. For this purpose, membranes with high methane/siloxane content can be used [122]. Although membrane separation techniques are very well established for mostly CO2 removal from biogas in industrial applications, there are only a few published results applying the membrane technique for more than 80% siloxane removal. Recently, a new method has been developed to remove siloxanes using a cryogenic temperature condensation system by Piechota [62]. In the study, the temperature of the system ranged between +40 to −50 °C with different biogas flow rates, and 99.87% of siloxane removal was achieved; moreover, the obtained biogas met biomethane requirements from the European Union [62]. The same author has published another method for the removal of siloxanes and the improvement of biogas quality [123]. A specially designed adsorptive packed column system was developed, and the remarkable results obtained show that siloxanes were removed entirely and nonsilica impurities were eliminated by 99.76% in comparison to the intake biogas [123].

#### 3.5.2. Removal of Water

Biogas is mostly saturated with water vapour after leaving the digesters operating at mesophilic temperatures. Water in the form of vapour in biogas can condense in gas pipelines or cause corrosion with sulphur compounds. Raw biogas, which has 5% water at 35 ◦C as saturated water vapour, can be removed by changing the pressure and temperature. When the pressure is increased or the temperature is decreased, water vapour will condense as a physical separation method. Additionally, absorption and adsorption methods can be applied to remove the water as a chemical drying method. Adsorption separation techniques include activated charcoal, molecular sieves, or silica. Other impurities such as siloxanes and particles can dissolve in water [106]. When removing water vapour in raw biogas, these impurities will be simultaneously removed.

Physical separation methods can be divided into three main groups which are namely cyclone separators which use centrifugal force for separation of water droplets, moisture traps which use a pressure differential to create a low temperature and condense water, and water traps which use a design of pipes to collect water [24,76,107]. These methods have a chronic operating problem where water freezes on the surface of a heat exchanger [76]. The dew point of biogas can be decreased to −40 ◦C using water adsorption under 6–10 bar pressure in the columns. Silica, alumina, magnesium oxide, or activated carbon is placed inside the pressurized columns. For continuous operation, two columns are needed. When one of them runs until saturation, the other regenerates at low pressure simultaneously. A benefit is that this system has a low operating cost. However, high initial investment costs and the required precleaning of dust and oil particles are drawbacks of the system [76]. When using the water absorption method with glycols, the biogas dew point can be decreased to −15 ◦C. One of the benefits of this system is that precleaning of dust and oil particles is not necessary. However, the solvent regenerates at 200 ◦C which causes high

operating costs. Ryckebosch et al. [21] reported that the biogas flow rate should be at least 500 m3/h for the economic benefits of the glycol-based system.

#### 3.5.3. Removal of Ammonia

Ammonia is another common impurity. If the substrate contains proteins, ammonia is produced during hydrolysis. NH3 is removed during the recovery or primary drying of the biogas and during the adsorption process.

Guo et al. [124] designed a packed bed N-TRAP system impregnated with H2SO4 for NH3 removal from biogas. The adsorbent in the N-TRAP system was prepared with waste wood-shaving sand and anaerobic digestion biowaste which had a higher adsorption capacity than activated carbon when under the same conditions. In addition, this system is advantageous in that it can be applied in the presence of water, unlike activated carbon, and the adsorbent saturated with NH3 can be used as fertilizer.

Co-removal processes involving biological techniques for the removal of H2S and NH3 as a mixture have also been reported. Jiang et al. [125] suggested a horizontal biotrickling filter packed with exhausted activated carbon for the co-removal of H2S and NH3 from biogas. The biofilter used was inoculated with nitrifying bacteria that oxidize sulphur. The removal efficiency for H2S was 95% for a 20–100 ppm operating range and 8 s gas residence time. For gas residence time longer than 4 s, NH3 removal efficiency reached 98%. However, NH3 degradation resulting from high H2S concentration has been observed [126]. These effects may be due to the accumulation of ammonium sulfate ((NH4)SO4) in the system.

Alternatively, NH3 can be extracted from the biogas along with other unwanted components. For example, as mentioned in the previous sections, sulphur compounds and halogenated compounds in biogas can be removed in addition to ammonia by using a water-scrubbing method [75]. In addition, NH3 and water vapour can also be removed together using a PSA system.

#### 3.5.4. Removal of Oxygen and Nitrogen

N2 and O2 are generally absent in the reactor because of anaerobic conditions. If N2 is detected in raw biogas, it is a strong sign of air leakage in the reactor because O2 will react with H2S and oxygen itself will not be detected. Its presence in biogas is undesirable due to the diluent effect that may cause a decrease in methane content. O2 can be tolerated up to some amount in biogas, but high amounts are undesirable as the risk of biogas explosion increases.

O2 and N2 can be removed from biogas by the adsorption method using a molecular sieve or activated carbon. PSA or membranes used for sulphur and CO2 removal can remove some of the O2 and N2. As a result, both components are difficult and expensive to extract from biogas [109]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and apply new biogasboosting technologies to remove N2 and O2.

#### 3.5.5. Comparison of Different Technologies to Upgrade Biogas

The most common upgrade technologies today are PSA, amine wash, and water scrubbing. PSA can actually be improved with newer and better-performing adsorbents [79]. Organic solvent washing is a highly effective upgrade technique, but there is no clear trend for this technology to increase or decrease within the biogas upgrade market. The development of this technology mostly depends on studies such as the optimization of pressure and temperature adsorption amounts. Additionally, organic solvent washing technology requires annual compensation of solvent lost to the atmosphere, which will increase the cost [79].

New process cycles are being developed to optimize methane yields, removal of unwanted gases from biogas, and energy demand [89]. The least-mature technology among these is membrane separation technology, but it has recently begun to develop rapidly in industrial applications [19]. The membrane separation technologies are attractive in terms of lower investment and operating costs compared to other techniques. Membrane separation technologies have proven to be suitable to replace other upgrading technologies. Polymeric membranes used in membrane separation technologies are preferred because of their low cost and flexibility [127]. However, the high cost of this technique and the impermeability of membranes to foreign matter limit the use of this technique. It was also stated that the membrane separation technique is relatively more expensive than the PSA technique [128].

If biogas-upgrading technologies are evaluated in terms of biomethane purity, the most important parameter is to remove CO2. Many upgrade technologies can obtain biomethane with 97% methane content, but high energy demand and increased costs occur for biomethane higher than 97%. For example, in the case of substantial N2 in biogas, a complex adsorbent bed configuration can be used to remove this gas. This will result in both little refinement and a relatively high cost.

Table 4 compares the effects of different biogas uptake techniques in terms of methane recovery, biomethane purity, and electrical energy demands. Among the biogas-boosting techniques, the amine-scrubbing method appears to have relatively less electricity consumption, CH4 losses, and purer biomethane compared to other methods. However, amine scrubbers may need antifoaming agents. Additionally, since the amine washing technique is chemical adsorption, it should not be forgotten that the efficiency and effects of this technique will vary depending on the chemical used.


**Table 4.** Comparison of the effects of some biogas-upgrading technologies.


**Table 4.** *Cont.*

Another parameter effective in comparing the upgrade techniques is the size of the plant. For example, although the water-scrubbing technique in small plants is relatively less costly compared to other techniques, it has shown a higher cost compared to the PSA technique. Considering the external costs, the choice of upgrade technologies for each system is not affected much by the other. Considering this situation, chemical adsorption technology is preferred as it causes less CH4 loss compared to other techniques [114]. Waterscrubbing and PSA techniques suffer from higher methane loss and lower biomethane yield than other technologies. However, these techniques are quite suitable for small installations [128].

Converting biogas to biomethane is a strategic goal in many countries. Nonbiological (physicochemical) upgrade techniques have taken place in the literature with many applications and are at the level of high technology preparation. Biological techniques, on the other hand, are quite new technologies compared to other techniques and are advantageous in terms of feasibility and technological facilities. The development of biological upgrade technologies will be rapid and advantageous as the identified challenges are overcome.

#### **4. Utilization of Biogas**

As a renewable energy resource, biogas has gained enormous attention and the use of biogas is expected to increase considerably in the near future. According to estimations, the utilization of biogas will be 29.5 GW globally in 2022 while it was only 14.5 GW in 2012 [137]. Biogas can be used in a raw or upgraded form with different applications such as in a boiler to produce heat, combined heat and power (CHP) to produce heat and power, fuel cells to produce electricity, production of chemicals, production of vehicle fuels, and injection to the gas grid [26,138]. In the EU, electricity generated from biogas was 22 TW h/year in 2020 [139]. Moreover, the expectation is that it will reach 640 TW h/year, a 30-fold increase [140]. After 2017, greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 60% due to

biogas utilization [75]. Additionally, the estimation of biogas utilization for vehicle fuel shows that it may increase from 2% in 2017 to 27% in 2050 [75]. In the US, there were 283 manure-based biogas production plants in 2021 and Figure 10 represents the end-used biogas utilization systems according to their technologies between 2000 and 2021 [141]. As of 2017, there was a divergent increasing trend in numbers of pipeline and CNG biogas projects in the US. This may be due to legal regulations in 2016 and the widespread use of biogas as a fuel for agricultural purposes.

**Figure 10.** The end-used biogas utilization system according to their technologies in the US from 2000 to 2021 [141].

When producing electricity from biogas, different methods have different impacts on emission rates due to their combustion processes. For example, gas engines produce low emissions, while diesel engines which use ignition oil have high gas emissions in their exhaust fumes. Electricity production in engines of less than 100 kW has lower efficiency and a higher rate of exhaust gas emissions when compared with electricity production at higher than 300 kW [142]. It is clearly implied in the literature that biogas utilization for the production of electricity is much more environmentally friendly compared to electricity generation from fossil fuels.

Biogas can also be used as a hybrid with other renewable energy sources to stabilize energy systems such as alongside wind and solar [143]. Additionally, it has been utilized for cooking and lighting purposes for a long time in developing countries. In this section, the utilization of biogas and associated technologies will be reviewed. Biogas utilization pathways are represented in Figure 11.

#### *4.1. Boilers, Gas Engines and Gas Turbines*

Boilers are the most common way to produce heat from biogas, and internal combustion engines are the most commercialized process for power production from biogas at biogas power plants. Boiler efficiencies are between 75 and 85% [144] for heat production from biogas. Typical boilers can be made suitable for biogas utilization with small modifications such as gas-airflow rates. The advantage of these boilers is that they are able to burn low-quality biogas [145]. Internal combustion engines, which are developed for natural gas, can be used for biogas without any modification. The four-stroke engines' capacities are between a few kW and 10 MW and their lifetime is approximately 60,000 hours; however, their electrical efficiency is low, between 35 and 40% [42]. Their efficiency and antiknock properties are increased with a reduction in CO2 concentration in biogas [145]. The most common system for the production of power and heat simultaneously is known as com-

bined heat and power (CHP) plants. In the EU, half of the biogas plants have CHP units, which are run with four-stroke engines, and half of these engines are diesel engines [42]. A modern CHP plant's heat and power efficiency is 85–90% [145]; however, the electrical efficiency is under 40% and only 2.4 kWh of electricity can be produced when 1 m<sup>3</sup> biogas is combusted [42]. In addition, gas turbines are used to produce electricity from biogas. Various capacities of gas turbines are available in the market, from 500 kW to 250 MW, and single-cycle gas turbine efficiencies are between 20–45% and their efficiency increases with the size [145]. The distinguishing feature of a gas turbine is low NOx emissions, which are less than 25 ppm when the cleaned biogas is used [42].

**Figure 11.** The schematic representation of biogas utilization pathways (adopted from [58]).

Using small-sized engines for the utilization of biogas is still problematic due to low efficiency [146]. Currently, the homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) method has been heavily researched and has shown to be a promising technique. Saxane et al. [147] and Reitx et al. [148] made comprehensive reviews about HCCI technology and compared it with spark-ignited and diesel engines. HCCI uses low-temperature combustion which produces low NOx emissions. A study tested the HCCI thermal efficiency and found it to be around 50%, which is close to diesel engine performance when diesel and biogas mixtures were used [149]. In fact, additional biogas in the fuel decreases thermal efficiency due to its low calorific value. Bedoya et al.'s [150] experimental study clearly showed that HCCI is a promising method to reach high thermal efficiencies of 44% and low NOx emissions of 0.11 g/kWh. Additionally, Blizman et al. [151] reported that NOx emissions were at the same level for landfill gases with the HCCI method. Another method for using biogas is flameless combustion. This method is able to increase biogas efficiency and also decreases particles and NOx emissions. The study investigated biogas utilization using flameless

combustion, and the results revealed that electrical efficiency was 53% and CHP efficiency could reach 82% using exhausted gases for energy recovery with low NOx emissions which was around 2% of the volume of exhausted gases [152].

Innovative methods for the utilization of biogas include dual-fuel engines, stirling engines, and micro gas turbines. Dual-fuel engines use biogas by cofiring with very small amounts of biodiesel, bioethanol, or diesel [153]. Stirling engines convert thermal energy into mechanical energy; thus, they are theoretically perfect for producing electricity from waste thermal energy. The initial investment cost is still very high and their electrical efficiency is around 20% [154]. Micro gas turbines are compact, operate at high speed, are low noise, and are vibration-free where gas turbines and their power range is between 25 and 500 kW. If the methane content in biogas is higher than 30%, the biogas can be used with a micro gas turbine [145]. Their electrical efficiency is higher than 45% [143].

In the literature, biogas and diesel in the dual-fuel mode in combustion ignition (CI) have been studied since 1980. Mathur et al. [155] used biogas as a biofuel in CI and Prakash et al. [156] improved a mathematical equation to predict the ignition delay of dual-fuel mode CI. Mustafi et al. [157] investigated dual-fuel mode CI with different CH4 and CO2 ratios of biogas and diesel. The results revealed that 70% of particulate matter (PM) emissions and 37% of NOx emissions were reduced compared with diesel fuel when the biogas contained 70% of CH4 [157]. Cacue et al. [158] investigated the effect of enriched oxygen in the air and dual-fuel mode in CI. They reported that increased O2 concentration in the air gave a positive impact on biogas and diesel dual-fuel mode for emission and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) according to the control group. BTE increased by 28% when the O2 concentration in the air reached 27% [158]. Another comprehensive study focused on combustion characteristics and emissions in dual-fuel mode with different feeding ratios of biogas [159]. They used diesel and four different biogas feeding rates of 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 kg/h. The results represented that 14.8, 26.6, 36.9, and 43.9% of energy could be met from biogas in dual-fuel mode at the full load when biogas flow rates were 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 kg/h, respectively. Moreover, with a 1.2 kg/h biogas feeding rate, the exhaust temperature and NOx were decreased by 14.2 and 42.8%, respectively when compared with control fuel at full load [159]. Another study was focused on the exergy analysis of biogas and diesel fuel under the dual-fuel mode and the result revealed that exergy efficiency does not drop as energy efficiency does when biogas was used as a primary fuel [160]. Recently, Wang et al. [161] studied a reactivity-controlled compression ignition mode based on dualfuel combustion. In their report, the BTE could reach 40% in the optimal condition. Another promising development has occurred in fuel in recent years. This development is known as modified fuel, in which liquid fuels are mixed with nanoparticles. The nanoparticles act as combustion catalysts, especially with CI engines [162]. Diesel or biodiesel have been mixed with different nanoparticles, which are classified as metal, metal oxide, nanofluid, and carbon nanotubes [163]. However, additive nanoparticles give several advantages to fuels, and researchers have been generally focused on diesel and blending diesel and biodiesel fuels. In the literature, there is a huge gap to be filled regarding other biofuel resources such as modified fuels. Modified fuels can be used with biogas in dual-fuel mode. To the authors' best knowledge, only one group has been working on this topic. Feroskhan et al. [164] investigated a dual-fuel CI engine with fueled biogas and modified diesel. They modified diesel with 15, 25, and 35 ppm CeO2 as an additive material and they used this fuel with different biogas feeding rates in dual-fuel CI [164]. In their first study, modified diesel with 15 and 25 ppm CeO2 and 4 L/min biogas feeding rate showed higher BTE than both diesel and modified diesel [165]. In their second study, they worked on the optimization of CeO2 concentration in dual-fuel mode CI. Their results revealed that biogas and modified fuel with 25 ppm CeO2 reduced all emissions and increased BTE [164]. Table 5 shows the current studies with their key results.


**Table 5.** Biogas utilization in the compression ignition engine with dual-fuel mode.

\* was calculated from the paper data. ↑ was increase, ↓ was decrease.

Biogas can be easily used in spark ignition (SI) engines due to mixing with gasoline, after which it can be fed into the cylinder, while dual-fuel mode has to be used for compression ignition with mixing air. A study reported that when the biogas was used with a spark engine with a compression ratio of 10 and a BSFC increased by 66% while BTE, CO and NOx, emissions were reduced by 12%, 40%, and 81.5%, respectively, compared to fueling with gasoline [173]. Another study investigated the compression ratios of SI in the range of 6 to 9 [174]. The results revealed that the power obtained from the test engine fueled with biogas was increased by 13.4% and BSFC was decreased by 18.18% when the compression ratio was 8 [174]. A similar study reported the same finding for the compression ratio of SI. When ethanol and biogas were used, HC, CO, and NOx emissions were decreased while BTE was increased [175]. Table 6 represents the findings of the recent studies when biogas was used as a fuel in an SI engine.

**Table 6.** Biogas utilization in the spark ignition engine.


\* was calculated from the paper data. ↑ was increase, ↓ was decrease.

#### *4.2. Fuel Cells*

One of the most efficient ways to generate electricity using biogas is through a fuel cell. The method uses an electrochemical reaction where oxygen and hydrogen atoms react to produce energy and water. The fuel cell has an anode and cathode that are separated from each other with a nonconductive solid or liquid electrolyte. Fuel flows through the anode and oxygen goes through the cathode. The ions, which are produced at the anode, are able to pass through the electrolyte; however, the electrons pass through an external circuit and generate electricity [145]. Fuel cells are a relatively new technology with high efficiency and low emissions as reviewed by Alves et al. [182] and Bocci et al. [183]. Biogas utilization with fuel cells requires fuel purification and a cleaning process depending on fuel cell types. Therefore, biogas is more challenging than natural gas to use as a fuel. Additionally, another drawback of the fuel cells is their relatively high operating temperature, which depends on the type of fuel cell used. There are generally three different fuel cell types which utilize biogas.

#### 4.2.1. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs) are made of solid oxide or ceramic materials. This method has recently gained much attention. Ni-based material is generally used as an anode without deterioration of the fuel cell because it is cheap [184]. However, the fuel cell performance has a close relationship with impurities in biogas, especially H2S. Directly feeding biogas to SOFC is a heavily studied subject both experimentally [184–189], and with modeling [190,191]. Shiratori et al. [189] reported that Ni–ScSZ cermet was used as an anode material at 1000 ◦C operating temperature, and they achieved a cell voltage above 0.9V after cleaning the H2S in biogas. Moreover, they demonstrated that SOFC can tolerate H2S impurity up to 1 ppm. Another study claimed that there is not any significant degradation after H2S removal and the biogas can be used as a fuel for electricity generation with SOFC [188]. To decrease impurities in biogas, air can be added into biogas with no significant changes in the output voltage [143].

The system can work under either intermediate (600–800 ◦C) [184,187] or high (800–1000 ◦C) [189] temperature conditions. The temperature is a significant parameter for SOFC because electrochemical reactions are fast above 600 ◦C [46]. In addition, Ma et al. [187] reported that biogas is more suitable than H2 due to carbon degradation.

SOFC-based power-plant efficiency was estimated to be 74% when the method of partial oxidation reforming of the biogas was used [192]. Additionally, the efficiency can reach 80.5% with a heat recovery system. SOFC thermoeconomic analysis showed that pressurized SOFC can be more economical and can have a 25% lower electricity cost at 20 bars of pressure [193].

#### 4.2.2. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) run at a relatively low temperature and pressure compared to SOFCs. Their temperature and pressure range is between 50 and 100 ◦C, and 1 and 2 bars, respectively [194]. This fuel cell requires clean, hydrogen-rich fuel; therefore, it is not suitable for biogas utilization. Gual et al. [195] modeled biogas utilization with PEMFC. According to their results, electrical efficiency was 40% and the whole system efficiency reached 82% when the fuel cell was combined with CHP. Schmersahl et al. [194] studied PEMPC experimentally. They claimed that its performance was lower with biogas rather than natural gas. However, its efficiency was still higher than internal combustion engines. Another study confirmed their result with their model [196]. This study calculated that the electrical efficiency of PEMFC is around 40%.

#### 4.2.3. Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC) are made of porous nickel electrodes and molten carbonate salt. This fuel cell has several advantages such as using different fuel sources, high efficiency, and low environmental impacts. The operating temperature is 600–700 ◦C

and CO can be used as a fuel; however, H2S has to be cleaned [197]. The first MCFC plant was built in the US in 1996 and was running with natural gas. It produced 2 MW of electricity with 43.6% efficiency [198].

Trogisch et al. [199] studied MCFC with different biogas sources and they achieved 50% electrical efficiency. Another study focused on the H2S toleration level of MCFC [200]. They suggested that sulphur-tolerant materials should be used in MCFC. Lanzini et al. [201] reviewed SOFC and MCFC plants and the effects of biogas containing significant impurities. All in all, MCFC needs further investigation to be commercialized.

#### *4.3. Biomethane*

Biomethane is almost equivalent to natural gas; therefore, it could be used for the transportation sector and for direct injection to gas grids. As mentioned in the previous section, raw biogas can be upgraded to biomethane by separating out CO2 and other impurities. If raw biogas is upgraded to higher than ~95% CH4, it can be directly injected into the gas grid and used as a vehicle fuel. In comparison to other countries, Sweden has best-utilized biogas as vehicle fuel. They have more than 36,000 vehicles on the road in 2011 that are running on biogas which can be refueled at 500 filling stations all over the country [202,203]. Another efficient way to use biomethane is to directly inject it into gas grids, because utilization of biogas at or near to production facilities is not feasible. Biomethane can be transferred through a large energy-demanding area with gas grids. Additionally, the separation of CO2 and CH4 can convert biogas into hydrogen-rich biogas via synthesis technology from Fischer-Tropsch [58]. Additionally, CO2 can be transformed into CH4, known as methanation through the Sabatier pathway [46]. Methanol production is able to pressurize CO2 with hydrogen under 20 bars of pressure. In the literature, hydrogen is obtained from water through electrolysis using renewable energy resources such as wind or solar power for obtaining CH4-rich biogas [95,204].

#### *4.4. Biosyngas and Biohydrogen*

Biogas can be used for the production of biosyngas with a reforming process. Catalytic reforming including partial oxidation reforming with a metal catalyst such as platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and iron (Fe) has been studied [205,206]. Although the catalytic reforming process is possible, biogas is not well suitable for this process because of the poisoning of the catalysts and a significantly increased production price. A gliding arc reactor was used to produce biosyngas. Tu et al.'s [207] experimental study showed that CH4 and CO2 were reformed into 31% H2-rich gases, and they claimed that a lower feeding gas flow allowed more hydrogen and carbon monoxide production and less hydrocarbon production. In addition, a tri-reforming process was studied for biogas utilization and their results showed high hydrogen yields, which were between 59.5% and 73.5% [208].

#### *4.5. Biomethanol, Bioethanol and Higher Alcohols*

Methanol can be used as a vehicle fuel. It can be converted to gasoline via a methanolto-gasoline process by catalytic conversion of syngas to methanol. Methanol has recently been produced from biomass using a biomass gasification process. In 2012, 200,000 tons of biomethanol was produced from biomass [209]. Biogas is also able to convert into methanol through processes such as oxidation of methane, photocatalytic conversion, biological conversion, and an indirect pathway, which reforms biogas and then methanol synthesis occurs. Methanol production has been reviewed by Park et al. [210]. Partial oxidation of methane is a well-established and the most widely used pathway to convert biogas to methanol. The process requires high pressure, which is between 0.5–15 MPa, or high temperature, which is between 700 and 750 ◦C, to reach high yield [58]. Hydroxyl radicals are used to produce methanol with a photocatalytic conversion pathway. Hydroxyl radicals react to CH4, and methyl radicals are produced. When these radicals and water molecules react, methanol and hydrogen are produced as a final product [211]. With a biological pathway, the bacteria use methane and ammonia to produce methanol [211]. Recently, Su et al. [212] achieved 0.33 g/L of methanol production with a biological methanol production pathway and a methanol conversion ratio of 0.47 mol methanol/mol methane.

Bioethanol and higher alcohols produced from biogas is a relatively new topic and has gained attention due to its energy density and low carbon and particulate matter emissions. Ethanol blend fuels have been used in the US; however, direct bioethanol and higher alcohols produced from biogas are still under research and development. With the catalytic approach patented by Exxon, CH4 is able to convert into ethanol and methanol directly [58]. For this method, Fe2(SO4)3 or Fe(ClO4)3 were used to produce ethanol and methanol and different noble materials have been investigated for this method [58]. However, an availability date is not contained in the literature.

Another method to produce ethanol and higher alcohols is a two-step approach. The first one is to reform biogas to syngas, and the next step is to convert syngas into ethanol and higher alcohols. The second step can take place in biological or catalytic conversion. With biological conversion, bacteria use the acetyl-CoA path. The reaction depends on the H2 to CH4 ratio. This method is a promising way to produce ethanol and higher alcohols in an ambient environment with no potential metal poisoning [58]. The yield of ethanol production from syngas was reported at 48 g/L [213]. With the catalytic conversion method, the reaction is an alternative way to produce ethanol and higher alcohols. The operating conditions require pressure and temperature of around 20 MPa and 300–400 ◦C, respectively [58].

#### **5. Conclusion and Future Trend of Biogas**

Biogas production from anaerobic digestion processes has gained great attention during the last two decades because of its many positive benefits, which include it being a low energy-demand process, it generating relatively low sludge production for disposal, and it being a form of renewable energy. Additionally, this process is key to make the best use of wastes and to obtain energy. The production of biogas with a well-optimized system is not the only difficulty, but upgrading the biogas quality is also necessary for it to meet certain requirements so it can be used instead of fossil fuels. Cleaning and upgrading technologies are currently being heavily studied. However, there is a lack of information available such as for commercial-scale applications including economic and environmental information. The cleaning and upgrading processes require high energy use and the input of additional chemicals. According to the results of this survey, the amine-scrubbing method appears to be more beneficial than other methods because of lower methane losses, lower energy demand, and higher final methane content.

Additionally, the removal of CO2, which is the second main product of biogas, and the removal of H2S, has been investigated with a novel approach using microalgae. Although it has some issues that need to be overcome such as O2 concentration during upgrading, it could be commonly used soon in commercial applications. However, biological methods are relatively new compared to other techniques but appear to be advantageous in terms of overall feasibility and advantages. The development of biological upgrade technologies may occur quickly once the identified challenges are overcome.

Another promising upgrading method is the membrane technique, due to economic and environmental concerns. In the literature, researchers have generally focused on reducing methane losses; however, the membrane material compatibility and improvement of resistance with different impurities in raw biogas should be be investigated in future research. New membrane materials and theories are still under development and are being tested in labs. The pilot systems should be applied and would fill the gap between lab-scale and large-scale systems. Additionally, in situ production and upgrading reactor design should be studied more to gain additional information and to be able to apply them to large-scale systems.

Biogas can be used as an energy source in different kinds of applications such as heat, vehicle fuels, gas-grid injection, biochemical production, and higher alcohols; however,

the cleaning and upgrading process is necessary for methane purification. The maximum energy could be obtained from biogas using a combined heat and power system. Moreover, there is a notable finding for internal combustion engines when adding nanoparticles which both reduces the harmful exhaust emissions and improves the engine performance when the engine is fueled with biogas under dual-fuel mode. Researchers should focus on this area to reveal the benefits and drawbacks.

Overall, biogas production and utilization are a great and promising pathway to reduce mankind's negative impacts on the environment and may reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Policymakers have to think about the underutilized significant potential of biogas production and increase their support for biogas utilization. With their support and researchers' efforts, biogas can be a significant solution towards a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, the production of renewable energy, and the management of waste disposal.

**Author Contributions:** Writing—original draft preparation, M.R.A., H.S., M.D., T.A.H. and D.K.; writing—review and editing A.A., M.R.A., C.E., H.M., S.U., S.K., N.A., H.D.K.; supervision A.A., C.E., N.A., H.D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Conflicts of Interest:** All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **Nomenclature**


#### **References**

