**4. Discussion**

Obviously, the identical managemen<sup>t</sup> tool, all of the other things being equal, will work with different efficiency in different cities at different development levels, and will affect the urban infrastructure sustainability in different ways. Therefore, for the optimal effective implementation of the proposed initiatives ("road map"), the task of developing a methodology for the assessment of the level of urban development, including the construction of an indicator system that allows one to draw practical conclusions in terms of the adjustment of state and municipal policies, becomes relevant.

The effectiveness indicators for the implementation of the proposed "road map" can be considered absolutely achieved if, at the same time, we use a city or urban agglomeration, characterized, for example, by the list of parameters proposed in [115,116] (see Table 2).

An important condition in the formation of such a parameter list is to consider the effect of using the proposed tools for various stakeholder's groups. The most popular approach involves the assessment of the effect obtained in four directions: the economic effect, the social effect, the technological effect, and the environmental effect [31]. The authors' vision of these effects for the main stakeholder groups is shown in Table 3.


**Table 2.** Parameters of the investment attractiveness of the municipality [115].

**Table 3.** The effects from the proposed initiatives for different stakeholder groups (compiled by the authors).


In order to clarify the processes of introducing digital technologies (hereinafter referred to as DT) into the activities of the housing and communal service managing organizations in the Russian Federation, it is necessary to systematize them. Therefore, the prospects for the development of this study are associated with a large-scale analysis of digital technologies used in world practice for the managemen<sup>t</sup> of capital construction projects in the housing and communal service sector. The systematization of DT is supposed to be carried out according to the following criteria:

	- • cheap/expensive
	- • free access/limited access
	- • secure for the storage of private data/vulnerable for the storage of private data
	- • easy to implement/difficult to implement
	- •easy to use/difficult to use
	- • cheap/expensive
	- • free access/limited access
	- • secure for the storage of private data/vulnerable for the storage of private data
	- • easy to implement/difficult to implement
	- • easy to use/difficult to use.

Carrying out the systematization of DT will allow the most correct determination of the periods and the sequence of their implementation, and will assess the effect of their use for the main stakeholders of this process.
