*2.2. Construction of Experiment*

This study evaluated 10 light recipes from the literature, as can be seen in Figure 2. After that, the LED artificial radiation system was configured for continuous and pulsed emission to generate the first dataset (see table at the top of figure) to be analyzed. The intensities parameters were 50, 65, 80, 95, 110, 125, 140, 155, 170, and 185 μmol m−<sup>2</sup> s−1, as

determined by a quantum sensor, and the frequency was set to 100, 500, and 1000 Hz with 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% duty cycles for different treatments.

**Figure 2.** Flow diagram for collection of CPPS measurements for the dataset.

In the generation of the second dataset, four different light recipes were set at intensities of 60, 70, 85, 90, 90, 100, 120, 130, 150, 160, and 180 μmol m−<sup>2</sup> s−1, the frequency was set at 100, 500, and 1000 Hz, and duty cycles were randomly selected at 60%, 70%, and 80%, depending on the treatment (see table at the bottom of Figure 2).

The artificial illumination system included 14 light recipes (see tables in Figure 2) with all combinations of parameters. After 60 min of radiation, we registered the measurements for the energy demand with a hook-on AC ammeter (Peak Teach, Salerno, Italy) in watts × hours (Wh). Then, the artificial radiation system was turned off for 15 min to cool down.
