Search Results (37)

Background/Objectives: Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) hold significant clinical value for the management of hypertension, diabetes and other chronic diseases. However, since the complexity of formulations, generic compounds require both in vitro pharmaceutical equivalence and in vivo bioequivalence (BE) for each active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) not only bridges in vitro drug properties to in vivo pharmacokinetics but effectively assesses the impact of formulations on systemic exposure. This study was aimed at developing a PBBM for metformin–glyburide FDC and investigating its clinically relevant quality specifications. Methods: PK-Sim^® software (Version 11.3) was used to establish a PBBM for a metformin–glyburide FDC. Sensitivity analysis identified critical parameters and guided design of virtual populations. Subsequently, virtual bioequivalence (VBE) was assessed between both reference and test formulations, and BE-ensuring dissolution space was explored by the change in dissolution characteristics. Results: The in vivo behavior of products was successfully captured by the developed model. Sensitivity analysis indicated that systemic exposure was primarily sensitive to gastrointestinal (GI) pH and transit times. VBE analysis confirmed BE between the reference and test formulations. The dissolution safe space for the FDC was defined as the concurrent achievement of ≥ 50% dissolution within 25 min for metformin and between 35 and 170 min for glyburide, which constituted equivalent specification. Conclusions: The PBBM developed in this study systematically evaluated the VBE of metformin–glyburide FDC, optimized the acceptance criteria for traditional in vitro dissolution testing, and thereby explored its clinically relevant quality specification. Full article

Background: Fixed-dose combination medications (FDCs) are recognized methods of increasing adherence to polytherapy in chronic diseases. However, the role of FDCs in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) remains uncertain. We designed this study to assess persistence, adherence, and patient satisfaction with FDCs recently introduced to the Polish pharmaceutical market, which contain tamsulosin (an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) in combination with solifenacin (a muscarinic receptor antagonist) or dutasteride (a 5-α reductase inhibitor). Methods: The analysis included 50,435 men (67.8 ± 8.8 years old) managed by urologists for BPH-associated LUTS, who had been on combination therapies for at least 3 months. Two study visits, with an interval of 2.1 ± 1.4 months, were conducted between February and December 2024. Results: Single-component drugs (83.1%) were more common forms of therapy compared to FDCs (16.9%). ARAs (α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists) with 5-α reductase inhibitors comprised 70.2%, while ARAs with muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenergic agonists comprised 29.5%. Persistence with therapy across two visits was 82.0% for single-component drugs and 93.6% for FDCs (p < 0.001); OR = 1.31 (95% CI: 1.02–1.63). Similarly, adherence was better in patients treated with FDCs (96.6% vs. 91.0% at visit 1, p < 0.001; 99.3% vs. 97.9% at visit 2, p < 0.05). Patients prescribed FDCs were satisfied with therapy more often than those prescribed single-component drugs (62.6% and 76.8% vs. 50.6% and 67.5% at visits 1 and 2, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: 1. Combination therapies are still more commonly administered as separate tablets than FDCs in patients with BPH-associated LUTS. 2. The use of FDCs increases short-term satisfaction and persistence with therapy, with a mild effect on adherence. Full article

Background: Drug combinations with complementary mechanisms of action are able to achieve effective analgesia at lower doses, thereby reducing the risk of adverse effects (AEs). This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of ibuprofen/tramadol (IBU/TRA) compared with tramadol and a placebo. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-finding, pilot clinical trial compared IBU/TRA (400/37.5 mg and 400/75 mg) with 100 mg of tramadol and a placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe pain following dental surgery. The primary endpoints were pain intensity at 6 h (PI_6h) and the pain intensity difference from baseline to 6 h (PID_6h). PID_7h, the sum of pain intensity differences from baseline to 7 h (SPID_0–7h), pain relief (PAR_7h), total pain relief (TOTPAR_7h), the use of rescue medication and AEs were also assessed. Results: Seventy-two patients were randomized and evaluated. Both FDCs showed superiority over the placebo for PI_6h and PID_6h (p < 0.05) but were not significantly different from 100 mg of tramadol. The statistical superiority of FDCs over the placebo was observed for PID_7h, SPID_0–7h, PAR_7h and TOTPAR_7h. The percentage of patients receiving rescue medication was higher in the placebo (94.1%) and tramadol (52.6%) groups than the FDC groups (35.3% and 36.8% for 400/37.5 mg and 400/75 mg, respectively). A post hoc analysis showed that the FDCs had a superior analgesic efficacy to 100 mg of tramadol in the SPID_0–4h (p < 0.005). The incidence of AEs was comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions: Both FDCs of IBU/TRA provided superior analgesic efficacy compared to the placebo. We propose using SPID_0–4h as the preferred variable for evaluating the efficacy of this type of drug combination. Full article

Background/Objectives: Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medications containing olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate, and hydrochlorothiazide are widely used for the treatment of essential hypertension. Although effective, the use of racemic amlodipine, which contains both active S(−)-amlodipine and inactive R(+)-amlodipine, has been associated with dose-dependent adverse effects, such as peripheral edema. S-amlodipine, a pharmacologically active enantiomer, provides comparable antihypertensive efficacy at half the dose with a lower incidence of side effects. Methods: In this study, a modified FDC formulation was developed by replacing racemic amlodipine with S-amlodipine to enhance tolerability while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Results: A bilayer tablet design was employed to minimize the formation of impurities and ensure formulation stability, which was confirmed under stress and accelerated conditions. In vitro dissolution testing demonstrated pharmaceutical equivalence with the marketed reference FDC, and an in vivo pharmacokinetic study confirmed bioequivalence. Conclusions: These results suggest that the newly developed S-amlodipine besylate-containing FDC tablet is a viable alternative to existing olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combinations, offering comparable efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties with the potential for improved safety and patient adherence in the management of hypertension. Full article

Background/Objectives: Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) offer significant advantages for patients and healthcare systems by improving adherence and reducing pill burden. However, developing multi-drug formulations remains challenging due to complexities in drug compatibility, stability, and dissolution behavior. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated innovative therapeutic approaches. This study aims to develop and evaluate an FDC containing FR (an antiviral drug) and RT (a PDE4 inhibitor) for potential COVID-19 treatment. Methods: The proposed dual-layer FDC was formulated to achieve immediate release of RT using Klucel EXF and controlled release of FR using a combination of Klucel HXF and Compritol ATO888. Critical quality attributes, including drug–excipient compatibility, solid-state properties, tablet uniformity, and dissolution kinetics, were assessed. RT and FR quantification methods were developed and validated per international guidelines. Compatibility studies were conducted by combining excipients in fixed ratios with APIs, followed by stability testing. Results: No degradation or adverse interactions were observed between APIs and excipients. RT exhibited rapid dissolution within 30 min, while FR release was effectively controlled through a gel-forming matrix and lipid barrier. Bulk powder and tablet physical parameters met pharmacopeial standards, and content uniformity between layers was maintained. The formulation demonstrated a stable dissolution profile for both drugs, ensuring consistent drug release. Conclusions: The novel FDC of RT and FR exhibits favorable physicochemical properties, a stable dissolution profile, and potential for improved treatment efficacy in COVID-19 patients. By optimizing drug release mechanisms and ensuring formulation stability, this FDC could serve as a pharmaco-economically viable alternative to existing therapies, enhancing patient compliance and treatment outcomes. Full article

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease with high global prevalence and significant social and economic burden. The pandemic affected patients’ diagnostics and medicines dispensing. Diabetes was among the most-affected conditions during lockdown due to the limited resources and unaffordable medicines. The impact of the pandemic on utilisation and cost has not been thoroughly studied, which inspired us to conduct the current study. Objectives: The study explored cost dynamics, changes in antidiabetic medicines utilisation, and public expenditure of pharmacotherapy in three periods: pre-pandemic (2018–2019), during the pandemic (2020–2021), and post-pandemic (2022–2023). Methods: It is a retrospective, observational, macroeconomic analysis. Reimbursed cost and utilisation were analysed as a crude sum and as indexes of the average value. Results: The result shows that five new INNs have been included in the Positive Medicines List (PML), two of these being fixed dose combinations (FDCs). During the pandemic, a slow tendency of increase of the crude sum of public expenditure was observed, followed by a sharp increase in the post-pandemic period. The public spending increased more than twice, and we found a 30,018,982 Euro growth. The highest public spending is found for dapagliflozine in post-pandemic vs. pandemic period (index = 1.67), as well as empagliflozin/metformin and dapagliflozine in pandemic vs. pre-pandemic period (index = 0.21). Total utilisation increases from 58.16 to 71.78 DDD/1000 inh/day during 2018–2023. The most significant rise of utilisation is found for canagliflozin (index = 0.68) pandemic vs. pre-pandemic and dapagliflozin (index = 3.66) post-pandemic vs. pandemic. Conclusions: Analysis of the antidiabetic medicines market reveals the rising of reimbursed cost and utilisation in pre-, post-, and during the pandemic. In conclusion, organisation of the supply and financing of antidiabetic medicines was not affected during the pandemic. Full article

Background/Objectives: The importance of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for the treatment of hypertension is well established. However, from a stability perspective, FDCs present a challenge since the degradation of one active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) can be affected by the presence of another API. The aim of this study was to compare the degradation behaviors and evaluate the degradation kinetics of three antihypertensive drugs, perindopril tert-butylamine (PER), amlodipine besylate (AML), and indapamide (IND). Methods: The degradation processes were studied using the previously developed reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method after exposing each drug individually, as well as the combinations of two/three drugs, to different stress factors, such as light, oxidation, acidic, basic, or neutral pH values at different temperatures. Results: The results show that PER is most unstable under basic conditions and that AML displays a negative, while IND displays a positive effect, on PER stability when combined. AML is most affected by basic conditions and oxidation, and its stability is affected by both drugs positively; IND undergoes extreme photolysis, which is positively affected by AML but negatively by PER. Conclusions: Great care must be taken when formulating FDCs with these three drugs, as well as solutions or oral suspensions adjusted for geriatric or pediatric populations, since the stability of all three drugs is greatly affected by pH conditions, as well as light or oxidation factors and their interactions. Full article

The present study aims to characterise the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin (RIF) in tuberculosis (TB) patients with and without HIV co-infection, considering the formation of 25-O-desacetyl-rifampicin (desRIF). It is hypothesised that the metabolite formation, HIV co-infection and drug formulation may further explain the interindividual variation in the exposure to RIF. Pharmacokinetic, clinical, and demographic data from TB patients with (TB-HIV+ group; n = 18) or without HIV (TB-HIV− group; n = 15) who were receiving RIF as part of a four-drug fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimen (RIF, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) were analysed, along with the published literature data on the relative bioavailability of different formulations. A population pharmacokinetic model, including the formation of desRIF, was developed and compared to a model based solely on the parent drug. HIV co-infection does not alter the plasma exposure to RIF and the desRIF formation does not contribute to the observed variability in the RIF disposition. The relative bioavailability and RIF plasma exposure were significantly lower than previously reported for the standard regimen with FDC tablets. Furthermore, participants weighting less than 50 kg do not reach the same RIF plasma exposure as compared to those weighting >50 kg. In conclusion, as no covariate was identified other than body weight on CL/F and Vd/F, low systemic exposure to RIF is likely to be caused by the low bioavailability of the formulation. Full article

The purpose of this study was to enhance the stability of montelukast and levocetirizine for the development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) monolayer tablet. To evaluate the compatibility of montelukast and levocetirizine, a mixture of the two drugs was prepared, and changes in the appearance characteristics and impurity content were observed in a dry oven at 60 °C. Excipients that contributed minimally to impurity increases were selected to minimize drug interactions. Mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, hypromellose, and sodium citrate were chosen as excipients, and montelukast–levocetirizine FDC monolayer tablets were prepared by wet granulating the two drugs separately. A separate granulation of montelukast and levocetirizine, along with the addition of sodium citrate as a pH stabilizer, minimized the changes in tablet appearance and impurity levels. The prepared tablets demonstrated release profiles equivalent to those of commercial products in comparative dissolution tests. Subsequent stability testing at 40 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 5% RH for 6 months confirmed that the drug content, dissolution rate, and impurity content met the specified acceptance criteria. In conclusion, the montelukast–levocetirizine FDC monolayer tablet developed in this study offers a potential alternative to commercial products. Full article

Despite the availability of affordable pharmaceuticals treating cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), many of the risk factors remain poorly controlled. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), a form of incremental innovation, have already demonstrated improvements over combinations of single medicines in adherence and hard clinical endpoints. Nevertheless, there are many barriers related to the wider use of FDCs in CVDs. Our aim was to identify these barriers and explore system-level facilitators from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Identified barriers include (i) hurdles in evidence generation for manufacturers, (ii) limited acceptance of adherence as an endpoint by clinical guideline developers and policymakers, (iii) limited options for a price premium for incremental innovation for healthcare payers, (iv) limited availability of real-world evidence, and (v) methodological issues to measure improved adherence. Initiatives to standardize and link healthcare databases in European countries, movements towards improved patient centricity in healthcare, and extended value assessment provide opportunities to capture the benefits of FDCs. Still, there is an emerging need to facilitate the generalizability of sporadic clinical evidence across different FDCs and to improve adherence measures. Finally, healthcare payers need to be convinced to pay a fair premium price for the added value of FDCs to incentivize incremental innovation in CVD treatment. Full article

Whilst monotherapy is traditionally the preferred treatment starting point for chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes, other diseases require the use of multiple drugs (polytherapy) from the onset of treatment (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, tuberculosis, and malaria). Successful treatment of these chronic conditions is sometimes hampered by patient non-adherence to polytherapy. The options available for polytherapy are either the sequential addition of individual drug products to deliver an effective multi-drug regimen or the use of a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy product. This article intends to critically review the use of FDC drug therapy and provide an insight into FDC products which are already commercially available. Shortcomings of FDC formulations are discussed from multiple perspectives and research gaps are identified. Moreover, an overview of fundamental formulation considerations is provided to aid formulation scientists in the design and development of new FDC products. Full article

Background: Different drugs have been approved to reduce the intraocular pressure. However, most of them contain preservatives to maintain sterility and these can be toxic to the ocular surface. The aim was to determine the patterns of use of antiglaucoma agents and ophthalmic preservatives in a group of patients from Colombia. Methods: A cross-sectional study that identified ophthalmic antiglaucoma agents from a population database of 9.2 million. Sociodemographic and pharmacological variables were considered. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 38,262 patients were identified, with a mean age of 69.2 ± 13.3 years, and 58.6% were women. A total of 98.8% were prescribed antiglaucoma drugs in multidose containers. The most widely used were prostaglandin analogs (59.9%), especially latanoprost (51.6%) and β-blockers (59.2%). A total of 54.7% of patients received combined management, especially with fixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs (41.3%). A total of 94.1% used antiglaucoma drugs with preservatives (benzalkonium chloride, 68.4%). Conclusions: The pharmacological treatment of glaucoma was very heterogeneous, but the most commonly used therapeutic groups were in accordance with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines but with differences by sex and age. Most of the patients were exposed to preservatives, especially benzalkonium chloride, but the wide use of FDC drugs can minimize toxicity on the ocular surface. Full article

The purpose of this study is to derive an optimal drug release formulation with human clinical bioequivalence in developing a sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate-dapagliflozin propanediol hydrate fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. As a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, the combined prescription of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors is common. Therefore, this study simplified the number of individual drugs taken and improved drug compliance by developing FDC tablets containing sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate as a DPP-4 inhibitor and dapagliflozin propanediol hydrate as an SGLT-2 inhibitor. To derive the optimal dosage form, we prepared single-layer tablets, double-layer tablets, and dry-coated tablets and evaluated the drug control release ability, tableting manufacturability, quality, and stability. Single-layer tablets caused problems with stability and drug dissolution patterns. When the dissolution test was performed on the dry-coated tablets, a corning effect occurred, and the core tablet did not completely disintegrate. However, in the quality evaluation of the double-layer tablets, the hardness was 12–14 kilopond, the friability was 0.2%, and the disintegration was within 3 min. In addition, the stability test revealed that the double-layer tablet was stable for 9 months under room temperature storage conditions and 6 months under accelerated storage conditions. In the drug release test, only the FDC double-layer tablet showed the optimal drug release pattern that satisfied each drug release rate. In addition, the FDC double-layer tablet showed a high dissolution rate of over 80% in the form of immediate-release tablets within 30 min in a pH 6.8 dissolution solution. In the human clinical trial, we co-administered a single dose of a sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate-dapagliflozin propanediol hydrate FDC double-layered tablet and the reference drug (Forxiga^®, Januvia^®) in healthy adult volunteers. This study showed clinically equivalent results in the stability and pharmacodynamic characteristics between the two groups. Full article

(1) Background: There is a high burden of poor glycemic control in the Indian population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Currently, the use of metformin sustained-release (SR)–vildagliptin fixed-dose combination (FDC) is very low as compared to metformin immediate-release (IR)–vildagliptin FDC which is associated with higher adverse events (AEs). Here, we present real-world effectiveness of metformin SR–vildagliptin FDC treatment in patients with T2DM; (2) Methods: This retrospective analysis was carried out from the medical records of adult T2DM patients visiting a single study center in India (December 2020–February 2021). A total of 10 patients (aged ≥20 years) were treated with vildagliptin 50 mg and metformin SR 500 mg FDC for 15 days. The treatment response was assessed by the percentage of time spent in the target glucose range (TIR at baseline and 15 days after treatment); (3) Results: The glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at baseline varied between 6.5% to 12%. The glycemic control improved in 70% of patients (mean increase in TIR: 18.9%). Treatment adherence was 100%. No gastrointestinal symptoms or AEs were reported; (4) Conclusions: Early intervention with metformin SR–vildagliptin FDC in patients with T2DM can ensure therapy compliance in terms of superior efficacy along with safety and tolerability. Key summary points: Early initiation of combination therapy helps in early achievement of glycemic goals; Early initiation of metformin and vildagliptin FDC results in significant glycemic control with good tolerability and compliance; Metformin SR–vildagliptin FDC has lower adverse events, compared to metformin IR–vildagliptin FDC; A case series of ten patients with T2DM treated with metformin SR–vildagliptin FDC is presented to assess the real-world effectiveness of this combination. Full article

Background: The introduction of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) is expected to improve treatment compliance. Methods: There were 181 subjects who were randomized to three groups: ezetimibe–rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg, ezetimibe–rosuvastatin 10/20 mg, and telmisartan 80 mg. The primary outcomes were change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) and percentage change in low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to baseline at week 8. Results: The least-square mean (SE) in MSSBP changes between the ezetimibe–rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg group and the ezetimibe–rosuvastatin 10/20 mg group were −25.81 (2.34) mmHg and −7.66 (2.45) mmHg. There was a significant difference between the two groups (−18.15 (2.83) mmHg, 95% CI −23.75 to −12.56, p < 0.0001). Changes in least-square mean (SE) in LDL-C between the ezetimibe–rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg group and the telmisartan 80 mg group were −63.82 (2.87)% and −2.48 (3.12)%. A significant difference was observed between the two groups (−61.34 (3.33)%, 95% CI −67.91 to −54.78, p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Ezetimibe–rosuvastatin plus telmisartan treatment is effective and safe when compared to either ezetimibe–rosuvastatin or telmisartan. Full article