Search Results (77)

The current known data on the involvement of the peptidergic systems in breast cancer progression is overwhelmingly vast. Peptidergic systems are useful tools for imaging, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of breast cancer. These systems play a crucial role in both basic and clinical breast cancer research by enabling the exploration of novel molecular mechanisms, signaling pathways, and the development of effective drug design strategies. Breast cancer cells overexpress peptide receptors; at the same time they are known to interact with peptides that (a) exert an oncogenic action (adrenomedullin 2, endothelin, gastrin-releasing peptide, neurokinin A, neuromedin, neuropeptide Y, neurotensin, substance P, vasoactive intestinal peptide), (b) exert an anticancer action (angiotensin (1–7), ghrelin, peptide YY) or (c) exert dual oncogenic and anticancer effects (adrenomedullin, angiotensin II, bradykinin, corticotropin-releasing factor, β-endorphin, glucagon-like peptide 1, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, kisspeptin, methionine-enkephalin, oxytocin). This indicates that peptides, as well as peptide receptor agonists and antagonists, may serve as antitumor agents due to their diverse actions against breast cancer development, including the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and invasion, induction of apoptosis, and anti-angiogenesis. Multiple strategies have been developed to combat breast cancer, including peptide receptor silencing; antibodies conjugated to specific signaling proteins; antibodies targeting specific peptide receptors or oncogenic peptides; and the use of peptides or peptide receptor agonists/antagonists loaded with antitumor cargo. Future lines of research are suggested in breast cancer using promising anti-breast-cancer peptide receptor antagonists (HOE-140, exendin (9–39), bosentan, macitentan, PD168,368, CGP71,683A, SR48,692, aprepitant) or agonists (FR190,997, semaglutide, exendin 4, goserelin) mentioned in this review. Peptidergic systems have tremendous anti-breast-cancer clinical potential which must be exploited and developed. Taken together, the available data highlight the enormous promise of translational research into breast cancer and peptidergic systems for the development of effective treatments. A full understanding of the roles played by the peptidergic systems in breast cancer will serve to improve diagnosis and treatment. Full article

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, with incidence projected to rise, particularly among younger patients. In premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive disease, ovarian suppression is an established component of systemic therapy, most often achieved pharmacologically with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas). Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) represents a surgical alternative that ensures definitive suppression, eliminates compliance issues, and is more cost-effective in the long term. Despite these advantages, BSO induces irreversible menopause, associated with vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular morbidity, bone loss, cognitive decline, and reduced quality of life. Evidence suggests that BSO is most appropriate in selected cases, including women unable to tolerate or adhere to medical suppression, those with inadequate estradiol suppression, patients approaching natural menopause, individuals with metastatic hormone receptor-positive disease, and carriers of BRCA1 mutations, especially with triple-negative tumors. Conversely, data on its benefit in BRCA2 carriers remain limited. Overall, BSO provides oncologic outcomes comparable to medical suppression but at the cost of permanent systemic effects. The decision between surgical and medical ovarian suppression should be individualized, balancing oncologic efficacy, comorbidities, genetic background, and patient preference. Further studies are needed to define the optimal duration of medical suppression and clarify the role of BSO in hereditary breast cancer. Full article

Importance: Understanding trends in the use of hormonal therapy (HT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial to optimize treatment strategies, particularly for older men with locally advanced and metastatic disease. Objective: To evaluate changes in the patterns of adjuvant and primary HT use over time in older U.S. men diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study utilized SEER-Medicare data, which covers approximately 48% of the U.S. population and links cancer registry data with Medicare claims, including 149,515 men aged ≥66 years diagnosed with PCa between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed trends in the use of adjuvant HT for higher-risk and primary HT for lower-risk PCa. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for clinical and demographic factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of men receiving any form of HT within 6 months of PCa diagnosis. HT included injectable Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, orchiectomy, and anti-androgens agents. Results: The rate of adjuvant HT in higher-risk PCa patients increased significantly from 53.6% in 2010 to 68.1% in 2019 (p < 0.0001), with a steady rise in the last four years. In contrast, the rate of men with lower-risk disease receiving primary HT declined from 25% in 2010 to 16.9% in 2013, then peaked at 28.2% in 2015, and stabilized between 25% and 27.3% from 2017 to 2019. The overall HT usage increased from 33.5% in 2010 to 45.2% in 2019, showing a consistent increase over the years. These patterns persisted after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. Conclusions and Relevance: The increasing use of adjuvant HT in higher-risk PCa patients aligns with evolving treatment guidelines, while the stable rate of primary HT in lower-risk patients represents persistent inappropriate use and highlights the need for further efforts to optimize treatment choices. While previous studies focused on men with intermediate-risk PCa receiving radiation therapy, our study broadens the scope to include men who did not undergo radiation therapy, providing a more inclusive view of HT trends. Future research should focus on refining strategies to reduce inappropriate primary HT use and improve adjuvant HT administration. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) and oncological outcomes in premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who are receiving either bilateral oophorectomy (BO) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH) therapy. Both methods serve to inhibit ovarian function, which is essential for the management of estrogen-dependent tumors; however, their effects on QoL have yet to be fully clarified. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry, focusing on women under 55 diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who received either BO or GnRH within one year of diagnosis. QoL was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) at baseline and annually for five years. Results: A total of 181 patients were enrolled in the study; 40 into the BO group and 141 to the GnRH group. Both groups exhibited similar levels of sexual dysfunction after a one-year period; however, the BO group stated a higher frequency of hot flashes. PROMIS-10 scores improved in both mental and physical health over time, with no significant differences between the groups. Within the BO group, one recurrence was observed, in contrast to the GnRH group, which had six events. Nonetheless, the difference in recurrence rates did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The long-term QoL and oncologic outcomes for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were similar for BO and GnRH therapy. These findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions, considering patient preferences and side effects. Full article

Objectives: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols are preferred in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) as they provide the best combination of flexibility, acceptable outcomes, and safety. Numerous studies have compared outcomes between GnRH agonist long protocol and standard flexible antagonist protocol. However, there are scant studies investigating the effectiveness of antagonist administration from day 1 of ovarian stimulation in PCOS patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare laboratory and clinical outcomes in IVF between standard flexible day 5/day 6 versus day 1 GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients. Results: Our data indicates significantly superior oocyte yield and top-quality embryo proportion in patients with antagonists from day 1. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rates also tended to be superior in this group. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that administration of GnRH antagonists from day 1 of stimulation in PCOS patients undergoing IVF may lead to superior results. Full article

Background/Objectives: GnRH agonists may offer potential benefits when used for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluates the effect of a single-dose administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist on the day of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in artificial cycles, in terms of reproductive outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies. The outcomes assessed were live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, positive pregnancy test, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate. Three randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Results: The clinical pregnancy rate (56.5% vs. 47.4%; OR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01–1.60; p = 0.0426) and live birth rate (34.3% vs. 23.9%; OR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.00–2.91; p = 0.0483) were significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of positive pregnancy test, implantation rate, or miscarriage rate, although the analysis revealed a trend toward improved outcomes in the intervention group. Conclusions: In summary, although our meta-analysis indicates that a single dose of GnRH agonist in artificial FET cycles may be associated with improved clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, these findings are based on a limited number of available trials. Larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urgently needed before any changes to clinical recommendations can be justified. Full article

Background/Objectives: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay of prostate cancer treatment, especially in advanced disease. In particular, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (aGnRH) reduce the production of gonadotropin and, therefore, of testosterone. In about 10% of patients, the non-pulsatile stimulation of GnRH receptor initially causes a surge in LH and testosterone, defined as the “flare-up phenomenon”, leading to increased bone pain, spinal cord compression, bladder outlet obstruction and cardiovascular issues. To mitigate this effect, combining a first-generation antiandrogen agent (FGA) with aGnRH is recommended. However, second-generation anti-androgens, such as apalutamide, bind selectively and irreversibly to the androgen receptor (AR), exhibiting a more efficient inhibition of the AR pathway. Methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study of 27 patients (pts) with mHSPC, treated at a single center (“Santa Maria delle Grazie” Hospital in Pozzuoli, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Italy) between June 2022 and April 2024. Patients received apalutamide monotherapy for 14 days followed by continuous combination with aGnRH plus apalutamide. Serum PSA and testosterone levels were measured at baseline, at day 14 (after 13 days of apalutamide monotherapy), at day 28 (after an additional 15 days of apalutamide plus a aGnRH), and at day 60. Results: PSA levels decreased from a mean of 45.2 (±63.1) ng/mL at baseline to a mean of 12.6 (±23.4) ng/mL at day 14 and to 3.3 ng/mL (±6.0) at day 28 of treatment. After 14 days of apalutamide monotherapy, 21 patients (77.8%) achieved a >50% PSA reduction and 4 (14.8%) a >90% PSA reduction. The number of patients with undetectable PSA was one (3.7%) at day 14, two (7.4%) at day 28, and nine (33.3%) at day 60. The mean serum testosterone levels were 6.56 (±4.46) ng/mL at baseline, 6.58 (±4.42) ng/mL at day 14, and 2.40 (± 3.38) ng/mL at day 28. No significant difference in PSA and testosterone level reduction during treatment emerged between subgroups of patients with low- vs. high-volume disease. Conclusions: Apalutamide alone is a viable option for mitigating the flare-up phenomenon, avoiding first generation anti-androgen therapy, and it can achieve rapid and deep biochemical control. Full article

Objectives: Our aim is to report an uncommon pituitary activation occurring during the desensitization phase of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) long protocol, a cornerstone of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) therapy, in a young woman. Results: We present a case of a 33-year-old female patient with secondary infertility, who exhibited a prolonged and asynchronous follicular development during ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol. Therefore, during a repeat attempt, the long GnRH agonist protocol was employed. Surprisingly, rather than achieving suppression with the agonist, ultrasound detected many large follicles in both ovaries, accompanied by extremely elevated estrogen levels, indicating imminent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). This unusual phenomenon was also observed during a subsequent attempt using the long protocol in another reproductive center. As part of the work-up to identify the underlying etiology, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sella turcica was performed, which revealed an 11 × 13 × 10 mm pituitary macroadenoma without evidence of pathological hormone secretion. The luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulation test showed a normal luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone response. Other abnormalities of the hypothalamo–hypophyseal–target-organ axis were not found. Neurosurgical intervention was deemed unnecessary; radiological follow-up of the lesion was recommended. Conclusions: In this case, the clinical presentation was markedly different from the expected suppressive effects of GnRH agonist therapy, with profoundly elevated estrogen levels and clinical signs of imminent OHSS. Notably, hypersensitivity of the adenohypophysis was not demonstrated following a single physiological LHRH stimulation test. However, the presence of a pituitary adenoma identified on MRI raises the possibility that gonadotropin receptor function was altered by the lesion—an effect revealed only after repeated GnRH agonist exposure, resulting in a paradoxical stimulatory response. Full article

Introductions: Precocious puberty initiated at a very young age causes a severe loss in height potential and should be treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa). Controversial findings exist regarding the efficacy of GnRHa treatment in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) onset around the age of 8. This research assessed the impact of GnRHa treatment on the final height (FAH) of 117 girls diagnosed with CPP within this age group. Methods: This retrospective study included 117 CPP girls diagnosed at around age 8 (7–9 years old). Girls who started treatment between the ages of 8 and 9 (n = 71) and 7 and 8 (n = 46) were divided into groups 1 and 2, respectively. Predicted height (PAH), target height (TH), and FAH were calculated from medical records. Girls’ PAH, TH, and FAH were also compared between groups. Results: At beginning of treatment, the girls’ average ages were 8.59 ± 0.27 in group 1 and 7.50 ± 0.47 in group 2. In groups 1 and 2, GnRHa therapy durations were 1.97 ± 0.54 and 2.91 ± 0.61, respectively. There were no significant differences in TH (160.53 ± 5.49 vs. 160.57 ± 4.94), PAH (158.72 ± 5.23 vs. 158.35 ± 5.57), and FAH (162.42 ± 5.32 vs. 162.14 ± 5.70) between groups. FAH improved 4 cm from PAH in both (p = 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that baseline height SDS was the main FAH predictor (Beta: 0.572, p = 0.001). Conclusions: GnRHa may improve FAH even if the treatment is delayed after age 8. However, as this improvement is limited for this age group, the therapy option should be individualized and should not be considered for all children. Full article

Endometrial cancer (EC) affects 3–14% of women under 40 who wish to preserve their fertility. The standard treatment for EC is a hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy. However, for those desiring fertility preservation, oral progestogens such as medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) or megestrol acetate (MA) are the most common therapies in Fertility-Sparing Treatment (FST). Other treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and metformin plus progestin. This comprehensive review evaluates the best FST options for women with reproductive potential. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched in June 2023 using specific keywords. Studies included in the review focused on patients with EC undergoing FST, with outcomes such as complete response rate (CRR), recurrence rate (RR), pregnancy rate (PR), and live birth rate. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 23,976 patients. In only-oral progestin trials, CRR ranged from 18% to 100%; RR ranged from 0% to 81.8%; Death Rate ranged from 0% to 3.6%. In studies combining oral progestin with LNG-IUS, CRR ranged from 55% to 87.5%; RR ranged from 0% to 41.7%; Death Rate was 0%. Most patients with Stage IA EC received MPA or MA. Fertility-related outcomes were reported in 15 studies. PR ranged from 4 to 44 patients in trials involving only oral progestins. When combining oral progestin with LNG-IUS, PR ranged from 1 to 46 patients. Progestin therapy, including oral MPA and MA, is considered safe and effective, with limited evidence supporting the use of LNG-IUS. Full article

Hormonal factors play an essential role as an underlying causative factor of oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT), and these patients can benefit from hormonal medications that modulate the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis. This review aims to outline the various medications used as hormonal therapy in treating infertile men with OAT. This manuscript focuses on essential hormonal evaluation, identifying men who would benefit from treatment, selecting the appropriate medication, determining the duration of therapy, and evaluating hormonal treatment outcomes. Additionally, novel markers that can broaden the horizon of hormonal treatment in infertile men with OAT are discussed. Hormonal-based therapy options in men with OAT include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs), dopamine agonists, and injections such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs and gonadotropins. Treatment duration and the expected success will dictate the final treatment type for couples. In conclusion, hormonal therapy may improve spermatogenesis in infertile men with low serum testosterone. Gonadotropins and SERMs may increase sperm parameters in men with infertility and normal serum gonadotropin levels. AIs might help improve spermatogenesis in infertile men with a total testosterone (ng/mL)/estradiol (pg/mL) ratio < 0.10. In addition, dopamine agonists may play a role in enhancing spermatogenesis in infertile men with hyperprolactinemia. Full article

Overexpression of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) plays a vital role in the advancement of reproductive malignancies such as ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancer. Peptidomimetic GnRH antagonists are a substantial therapeutic development, providing fast and reversible suppression of gonadotropins by directly blocking GnRH-R. Unlike typical GnRH agonists, these antagonists prevent the early hormonal flare, have a faster onset of action, and have a lower risk of cardiovascular problems. These characteristics qualify GnRH antagonists as revolutionary therapy for diseases such as advanced prostate cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and in vitro fertilization procedures. Key GnRH peptide antagonists authorized by the regulatory agencies include Cetrorelix, Ganirelix, Abarelix, Degarelix, and Teverelix. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are dominated by Cetrorelix and Ganirelix, while Degarelix and Abarelix have shown significant promise in treating advanced prostate cancer. Teverelix appears as a next-generation GnRH antagonist with an ideal mix of efficacy and safety, showing promise in a variety of reproductive and hormone-dependent illnesses. This review investigates the pharmacological role of GnRH in reproductive physiology and its consequences in disease, emphasizing structural advances in third- and fourth-generation GnRH antagonists. All GnRH peptide-based antagonists were analyzed in detail for formulation strategy, pharmacokinetics, effectiveness, and safety. This review also emphasizes GnRH antagonists’ clinical promise, providing insights into their evolution and the possibility for future research in developing safer, more effective treatments for complicated hormonal diseases. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease imposes an increasing burden on aging Western societies. The disorder most frequently appears in its sporadic form, which can be caused by environmental and polygenic factors or monogenic conditions of incomplete penetrance. According to the authors, in the majority of cases, Alzheimer’s disease represents an aggravated form of the natural aging of the central nervous system. It can be characterized by the decreased elimination of amyloid β_1–42 and the concomitant accumulation of degradation-resistant amyloid plaques. In the present paper, the dysfunction of neuropeptide regulators, which contributes to the pathophysiologic acceleration of senile dementia, is reviewed. However, in the present review, exclusively those neuropeptides or neuropeptide families are scrutinized, and the authors’ investigations into their physiologic and pathophysiologic activities have made significant contributions to the literature. Therefore, the pathophysiologic role of orexins, neuromedins, RFamides, corticotrope-releasing hormone family, growth hormone-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, ghrelin, apelin, and natriuretic peptides are discussed in detail. Finally, the therapeutic potential of neuropeptide antagonists and agonists in the inhibition of disease progression is discussed here. Full article

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6–10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0–100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0–100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0–100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0–3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results. Full article

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, improving progression-free survival. ADT suppresses the production of testosterone and reduces circulating levels of the hormone. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists are the most commonly used ADT modality. They can be given alone or in combination with androgen synthesis inhibitors or androgen receptor antagonists. An estimated 40% of prostate cancer patients will receive ADT as part of their therapy during their lifetime. However, ADT has numerous adverse effects, including an increased cardiovascular risk that impacts quality of life. Relugolix is an alternative form of ADT. It is the only oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, circumventing injection site reactions, making it easier for patients to take, and thus increasing compliance. Testosterone suppression with relugolix is excellent and testosterone recovery after discontinuation is rapid. This paper reviews the ADT and anti-androgen treatment options for men with prostate cancer and the cardiovascular effects of these therapies. There is accumulating evidence that cardiovascular risk with relugolix is lower than with other ADT medications and also lower than with androgen synthesis inhibitors and androgen receptor antagonists. This paper provides insight into the use of different ADT regimens based on the cardiovascular status and circumstances. It explores strategies to mitigate negative cardiovascular consequences and highlights the need for further study. Full article