Search Results (521)

Objective: Skeletal mandibular asymmetry (MA) is a pathological condition characterised by asymmetric mandibular growth, resulting in chin deviation and, in some cases, non-coincident dental midlines. Because it is a skeletal condition, some clinicians choose to treat it with functional appliances. The present study therefore evaluated whether functional appliances with asymmetric activation can promote more symmetrical growth of the mandibular condyles and rami. Methods: Eighty-five patients with MA were retrospectively selected based on cervical skeletal maturation stage 2 or 3, the presence of skeletal and dental Class II malocclusion, and the availability of good-quality orthopantomograms taken before and after treatment. Among the enrolled patients, 40 were treated with functional appliances to protrude and re-centre the mandible (study group), while 45 were treated only with a rapid maxillary expander (positive and treated control group). This control group was chosen because it has no direct effects on the mandible and avoided the ethical concerns associated with postponing time-sensitive treatment to recruit a negative control group. Ramus and condyle asymmetry were evaluated pre- and post-treatment using Habets’ method. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare pre- and post-treatment asymmetry indices between the two groups. Results: Although both groups showed a post-treatment symmetry improvement, no statistically significant between-group differences were observed (p = 0.712, effect size r = 0.14 for ramal symmetry; p = 0.663, effect size r = −0.01 for condylar symmetry). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, functional appliances did not demonstrate greater skeletal effects than the positive control treatment. Full article

Background and Objectives: Conventional stainless-steel orthodontic molar bands may exhibit limited anatomical adaptation, favoring plaque retention and periodontal inflammation. This study aimed to compare the periodontal outcomes of standard bands and CAD/CAM-customized molar bands in adolescents. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in 180 adolescents (mean age: 11.9 years) undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy. Participants were allocated to CAD/CAM-customized bands (n = 90) or standard stainless-steel bands (n = 90). Periodontal parameters—Plaque Control Record (PCR), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), and Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD)—were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Results: Baseline values were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). During follow-up, the CAD/CAM group showed significantly lower PCR, BOP, and PPD values. At 6 months, PCR was 21 ± 8% vs. 42 ± 12%, BOP was 17 ± 6% vs. 40 ± 10%, and PPD was 2.5 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.1 ± 0.6 mm (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: CAD/CAM-customized molar bands demonstrated superior periodontal performance compared with conventional bands. Improved anatomical adaptation may reduce plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation during orthodontic treatment. Full article

Background: Effective pain management is crucial during orthodontic treatments with fixed appliances, to ensure adequate patient compliance and to avoid treatment discontinuation. Photobiomodulation approaches, including Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) has received substantial attention, due to its potential as an effective, non-pharmacological analgesic modality, however, evidence pertaining to its efficacy is controversial. Our present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of LLLT vs. placebo, following placement of orthodontic elastic separators (ESs) in adult patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study was carried out, where n = 31 volunteers (18 male and 13 female; aged between 19 and 32 years) were enrolled. ESs were placed at the mesial and distal surfaces of the first permanent molars in both quadrants of lower, as well as upper jaws. Based on the assigned intervention, the four quadrants were divided as follows: three quadrants received LLLT treatment—using a 980 nm wavelength GaAlAs diode laser, with 0.1–0.2 W—according to three treatment regimes, i.e., regime 1 (R1): 6 J, continuous mode, R2: 12 J, continuous mode, and R3: 6 J, pulsed mode; while placebo treatment (P) was applied in the fourth quadrant. A questionnaire with a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100) was used for pain assessment (spontaneous pain and pain on mastication), scored directly after separation and after 6, 24, 48 and 72 h of both laser and placebo treatment application. Results: After the 24 h mark, significant differences were detected between the pain readings of LLLT-treated and placebo quadrants, both in resting position and during mastication (p < 0.05); pain readings were highest for R2, P, while lowest for R3 quadrants in resting position, and at R1 during mastication, respectively. Conclusions: Although findings of our study are exploratory in nature, they suggest that a single application of LLLT might be effective in reducing pain caused by ES placement, especially in the vulnerable 24 h following separation. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT07456709 (date of registration: 2 March 2026, retrospectively registered). Full article

Background/Objectives: Multiple impacted teeth are defined as the sequential impaction of more than two teeth in the alveolar bone, whether unilateral or multilateral. Multiple impactions are an uncommon and rare phenomenon demanding thorough treatment planning and careful execution, but data on the prevalence of multiple impactions is scarce in the literature. In cases of multiple impactions, clinicians generally perform a 3D assessment using CBCT to determine tooth positions, establish a sequence of surgical exposures, implement suitable traction, and utilise appropriate biomechanics. A multidisciplinary approach between orthodontists and oral surgeons is essential to achieve optimal results. Methods: This case report presents non-syndromic multiple impactions of three upper left permanent anterior teeth—21, 22, and 23—along with a retained supernumerary tooth preventing their eruption and a fused primary tooth. The primary teeth and the impacted supernumerary tooth were surgically removed. A digitally designed transpalatal arch was used to preserve the space and to act as anchorage for the orthodontic traction. After an 8-month observational period without spontaneous eruption, surgical exposure was carried out using the closed exposure technique. Subsequently, elastic traction was performed, guiding the impacted teeth into the dental arch. Results: The multiple impacted teeth were successfully aligned in the dental arch, achieving symmetry in the frontal segment while preserving periodontal health. In order to ensure stability during the retention period, thermoformed retainers were used. Conclusions: Each complex and rare clinical case poses a challenge to orthodontists and is important for the scientific literature as it provides valuable clinical experience. Full article

Background/Objectives: Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a biologically plausible adjunct for modulating orthodontic tissue response, but its role in conventional clear aligner therapy remains uncertain. This narrative review summarises the mechanistic rationale and clinical evidence on PBM used with clear aligners, focusing on treatment efficiency, predictability, patient-centred outcomes, and biological safety. Methods: Scopus was searched using PBM/low-level laser terms combined with orthodontics and clear aligners. Titles and abstracts were screened for human studies evaluating PBM as an adjunct to conventional staged clear aligner therapy and reporting treatment duration or alignment efficiency, tracking/predictability (for example, additional aligners, refinements, or fit-related outcomes), pain, or biological safety. Eight aligner-based clinical studies formed the core set. Results: The included studies comprised case reports, retrospective cohorts, pilot investigations, and one historical prospective nonrandomized comparison. Most evaluated short daily sessions of home-use near-infrared LED PBM, while some used external laser-based or combined adjunct protocols. Some studies reported shorter treatment duration, faster alignment, or fewer finishing aligners in PBM users, but these findings were difficult to attribute to PBM alone because altered tray-change intervals and close monitoring were common co-interventions. Aligner-specific pain outcomes were inconsistently reported. Limited safety data, based mainly on one retrospective pilot cohort assessing anterior teeth, found no statistically significant difference in root-volume change between PBM users and controls. Conclusions: PBM has been investigated as a potential adjunct in clear aligner orthodontics, but the available evidence remains preliminary, heterogeneous, and largely non-randomised. No high-quality randomized clinical evidence currently supports the clinical effectiveness or routine use of PBM in clear aligner orthodontics. At present, PBM should be regarded as an investigational adjunct rather than an established clinical recommendation, pending larger and better-designed trials with standardised device-specific protocols, objective adherence measures, movement-specific analyses, and longer follow-up for safety and patient benefit. Full article

Background: Orthodontic camouflage in Class III patients is a widely used treatment approach. However, its application is subject to specific clinical indications. This narrative review aims to synthesize the current scientific evidence and provide an overview of the available methods, their advantages and limitations, in order to guide the appropriate management of Class III camouflage cases. Methods: A literature search was carried out using five main scientific databases without restrictions. Inclusion criteria were all types of articles published on various orthodontic camouflage techniques for Class III malocclusion in adult patients. The string searches included “camouflage” and “Class III malocclusion”. In addition, a manual search was performed to identify further relevant articles. The methodological quality was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) classification. Results: This narrative review synthesizes 128 studies on orthodontic camouflage in adult Class III malocclusion. Among the 128 articles included, 110 (86%) were case reports or small case series, corresponding to level 4–5 evidence. The remaining studies were observational in design, most of them retrospective, corresponding to level 2–3 evidence. Extractive or non-extractive treatment can be used for non-surgical treatment of a Class III in adults. In recent years, aesthetic techniques, such as clear aligners or lingual fixed appliances, have been efficiently performed. Carriere Motion III is a fast and efficient method to mask a Class III occlusal relationship. Moreover, the use of temporary anchored devices (TADs) has proven to be an effective and minimally invasive method for managing mandibular distalization and a retraction of the lower incisors. Conclusions: Although most reports are case-based, recent advances such as TADs and clear aligners offer effective non-surgical alternatives for selected mild-to-moderate cases. Careful patient selection remains critical. The evidence was low-quality, and further prospective studies are needed. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Cotinus coggygria (Smoke Tree) Flower Water mouthwash in reducing halitosis and improving oral hygiene parameters among adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted with 30 individuals undergoing treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Participants were allocated (1:1) into two groups: Group A received the Cotinus coggygria mouthwash, while Group B received the placebo mouthwash. Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) concentration in breath, measured by the OralChroma^TM II device, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included dimethyl sulfide [(CH₃)₂S] and methyl mercaptan (CH₃SH) levels, assessed with the same device, and oral hygiene status evaluated using the Modified Silness & Löe Plaque (PI-M) as well as the Silness & Löe Gingival (GI) indices. Normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test and Student’s t-test. Results: A statistically significant reduction in H₂S levels was observed in the C. coggygria group compared to placebo (p = 0.014). Median H₂S levels decreased from 147.00 ppb at baseline (T0) to 35.00 ppb at follow-up (T1) after 2 weeks. A statistically significant reduction in total VSC levels was also observed in the C. coggygria group compared to placebo (p < 0.001). Median total VSC levels decreased from 254.00 ppb at baseline (T0) to 105.00 ppb at follow-up (T1) after 2 weeks. No significant differences were found between groups for the other volatile sulfur compounds. A Significant improvements were noted in periodontal parameters in favor of the C. coggygria group. The Gingival Index decreased from 2.0 to 1.3 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: −0.7 to −0.2), and the Plaque Index (PI-M) decreased from 1.6 to 1.0 (p = 0.001; 95% CI: −0.7 to −0.3). Conclusions: Cotinus coggygria mouthwash appeared to be an effective adjunct for managing halitosis and improving oral hygiene parameters in adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. No adverse effects were reported. Full article

Objectives: To evaluate the role of treatment timing in the management of Class II malocclusions with mandibular retrusion using Twin Block (TB) followed by fixed appliances (FAs). Methods: Forty-one Caucasian patients (22 females and 19 males) with Class II malocclusion treated consecutively with TB and FA were selected from the Orthodontic Clinic of the Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy and from a sample treated by a private practitioner in Auckland, New Zealand. According to the Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method, the subjects were divided into two groups: an early treated group (ETG) including 21 patients (mean age 10.8 ± 2.1 years) who began treatment before the pubertal growth peak (CS1–CS2), and a late treated group (LTG) including 20 patients (mean age 12.4 ± 1.1 years) treated at the growth peak (CS3–CS4). Cephalometric skeletal, dento-alveolar and soft tissue parameters were evaluated before treatment with TB (T0) and at the mid-term observation (at a postpubertal stage CS4–CS6) after FA (T1). Independent samples t-tests were performed to compare intergroup differences at T0 and T1 while Fisher’s exact test was used to assess differences for gender. Results: At T0, the groups showed statistically significant differences in mandibular dimensions, in accordance with the different age distribution. At T1, significant differences between ETG and LTG were observed in Co-Gn (5.0 mm, p = 0.048, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) −9.8 mm; −0.1 mm), Co-Go (3.7, p = 0.009, 95%CI −6.3 mm; −0.9 mm), and Pg′-TVL SN10 (2.7 mm, p = 0.039, 95%CI −5.2 mm; −0.1 mm). Conclusions: Class II treatment with TB and FA confirmed that including the pubertal phase in the functional-orthopedic treatment led to more favorable mandibular growth and chin projection when evaluated at a postpubertal observation. Full article

Background: This retrospective case series evaluated the descriptive clinical observations of the bio-activator AMCOP^® TC in the treatment of growing patients with Class III dento-skeletal malocclusion. In recent years, elastodontic appliances have been introduced as an evolution of conventional functional appliances. Elastodontic therapy could be an excellent therapeutic alternative in the early treatment of patients with Class III dento-skeletal malocclusion. Aim: This retrospective experimental study evaluated the descriptive clinical observations of the bio-activator AMCOP^® TC in the treatment of patients with Class III dento-skeletal malocclusion and described four clinical cases. Materials and methods: The study included 11 subjects (5 males and 6 females, aged between 3 and 12 years) treated with the AMCOP^® TC bio-activator for Class III dento-skeletal malocclusion. Patients used the AMCOP^® TC device for two hours in the afternoon and all night for 6–8 months and then only at night. For each patient, cephalometric analyses were performed on latero-lateral teleradiographs both at the beginning of treatment (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1). Analyses were performed using DeltaDent^® software. Conclusions: Cephalometric observations between T0 and T1 showed changes in sagittal relationship parameters, including ANB values; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Elastodontic therapy with an AMCOP^® TC appliance improved the correction of a Class III dento-skeletal malocclusion and postural restoration of the first cervical vertebrae. Although further studies are needed, AMCOP^® TC bio-activators may be considered a possible interceptive treatment approach in selected growing patients; however, the present findings should be interpreted with caution. Findings should be considered preliminary and interpreted with caution. Full article

This research presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven 3D scanning and printing system for the fabrication of personalized dental prosthetics, implants, and orthodontic appliances. The proposed system integrates high-resolution intraoral scanning, AI-based data analysis, and additive manufacturing to enhance precision, customization, and treatment efficiency. Patient-specific anatomical data and medical history are incorporated to optimize implant design, material selection, and functional performance. Nano-enhanced biocompatible materials are utilized to improve mechanical strength, durability, and antibacterial properties. Specifically, these materials demonstrate a 30% increase in overall precision and a 50% improvement in durability compared to traditional dental materials. In addition, the system adopts a zero-waste manufacturing strategy by recycling excess materials, supporting sustainable dental practices. The results demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy, patient comfort, and environmental responsibility in modern digital dentistry. Full article

Background: Functional appliance therapy is widely employed for the management of skeletal Class II malocclusion in growing patients. However, treatment outcomes are influenced by multiple biological and behavioural variables, including genetic background, craniofacial growth pattern, neuromuscular adaptability, orofacial resting postures, and patient adherence. These factors often limit direct comparison of different appliance systems. Monozygotic twin studies provide a unique biological model by minimizing genetic and environmental variability, allowing more accurate evaluation of appliance-specific effects. Methods: This case report presents a comparative evaluation of a clear functional jaw corrector and a conventional twin block appliance in two 11-year-old female monozygotic twins at cervical vertebral maturation index stage 3. Both patients exhibited similar skeletal Class II patterns, vertical growth tendencies, proclined maxillary incisors, and convex soft tissue profiles. Twin A was treated with a removable clear functional jaw corrector fabricated using mandibular advancement blocks incorporated into a 1.5-mm Essix retainer sheet, while Twin B received a conventional twin block appliance. Treatment objectives, wear protocol, and duration were identical. Neither patient received orofacial myofunctional therapy. Results: Post-treatment clinical and cephalometric evaluation demonstrated improvement in sagittal jaw relationships, facial profile, and occlusal relationships in both patients. However, differences were observed in the magnitude of skeletal correction, dentoalveolar effects, vertical control, and the extent of molar and canine relationship correction. Conclusions: Both appliance designs were effective in improving sagittal relationships under similar biological conditions, with minor differences favoring the clear functional jaw corrector. However, the findings also highlight that orthodontic appliance therapy alone does not address underlying orofacial myofunctional factors, emphasizing the importance of incorporating functional assessment and adjunctive myofunctional therapy for optimal and stable outcomes. Full article

Background: Orthodontic treatment is increasingly recognised as a complex, patient-centred intervention whose impact extends beyond occlusal correction to include physical comfort, psychosocial well-being, and self-perceived esthetics. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has therefore become a key outcome for evaluating orthodontic care across all treatment stages. Aim: This narrative review of 140 studies synthesises current evidence on OHRQoL changes in orthodontic patients before treatment, during active therapy, and after treatment completion, with particular emphasis on temporal patterns and appliance-related differences. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of 140 studies was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (search period: inception to December 2025). Studies assessing OHRQoL or patient-reported outcomes in orthodontic patients of any age were included. Only studies employing validated instruments, such as OHIP, CPQ, OIDP, and PIDAQ, were considered. Dual-reviewer agreement was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ = 0.82). Formal risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Sensitivity analyses were performed comparing high-quality studies (low risk of bias, n = 52) versus all included studies. Results: The reviewed evidence consistently demonstrates that malocclusion is associated with impaired baseline OHRQoL, particularly affecting psychosocial and esthetic domains. The early phase of orthodontic treatment is marked by a transient deterioration in OHRQoL due to pain, discomfort, speech disturbances, and functional limitations (87% of studies report pain peaks within 24–48 h; 79% report resolution by 4–7 days). These effects typically diminish as patients adapt to the appliance. Progressive improvement is observed during mid-treatment, while treatment completion is associated with substantial long-term gains in self-esteem, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Appliance type influences short-term outcomes, with clear aligners generally associated with better early OHRQoL than fixed and lingual systems (65–75% of studies favour aligners for early comfort; 78% favour lingual systems for esthetic satisfaction). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment follows a dynamic, time-dependent OHRQoL trajectory characterised by short-term impairment and significant long-term psychosocial benefits. Systematic integration of validated OHRQoL measures into orthodontic care may enhance patient-centred decision-making and optimise clinical outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of a 2-hinged expander activated with the alternate rapid maxillary expansion–constriction (Alt-RAMEC) protocol on craniofacial structures and the soft tissue periodontium in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion characterized by maxillary retrusion. Methods: Lateral cephalograms obtained at baseline (T0) and immediately after treatment (T1) from 15 adolescents (6 females, 9 males; mean ages 12.6–13.1 years) treated with a 2-hinged expander using a 9-week Alt-RAMEC protocol were analyzed. A control group consisted of 27 untreated Class III individuals (7 females, 20 males; mean ages 12.5–12.6 years). Sagittal and vertical skeletal, dental, and soft tissue measurements were assessed using a Cartesian coordinate system. Periodontal parameters of supporting teeth were evaluated at T0 and T1. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). Results: Significant anterior maxillary displacement was observed in the treatment group compared with controls (p < 0.01), accompanied by increases in overjet and Wits appraisal (p < 0.05), while mandibular position remained unchanged. The upper lip advanced in accordance with skeletal changes (p < 0.05). Gingival index, bleeding index, and probing pocket depth increased significantly in supporting teeth (p < 0.05), whereas plaque index remained stable (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The 2-hinged expander combined with a 9-week Alt-RAMEC protocol induces immediate skeletal maxillary advancement in growing Class III patients with minimal dental compensation. Short-term periodontal changes suggest a transient inflammatory response associated with appliance therapy. Full article

Background and Objectives: Halitosis can impair psychosocial well-being, and orthodontic appliances may modify plaque retention and oral ecology. We compared patient-perceived halitosis burden, clinician-rated malodor, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among clear aligner users, fixed-brace patients, and untreated controls, and explored oral and salivary correlates of worse malodor severity. Methods: This cross-sectional study (March 2024–November 2025) enrolled 184 participants aged 15–35 years (aligners n = 62; fixed braces n = 64; controls n = 58). Outcomes were HALT (0–100), organoleptic score (0–5), and OHIP-14 (0–56). Plaque index, gingival inflammation, tongue coating, and unstimulated salivary flow were recorded; low flow was defined as <0.25 mL/min. Organoleptic score ≥ 2 was used descriptively for clinically relevant malodor prevalence, whereas organoleptic score ≥3 defined a moderate-to-severe malodor phenotype for secondary exploratory internal modeling. Multivariable robust linear models (HALT) and proportional-odds ordinal logistic regression (organoleptic severity) were used. Results: Fixed braces showed higher HALT (53.7 ± 6.2) than controls (46.3 ± 6.4) and aligners (41.7 ± 7.4) (p < 0.001), higher organoleptic scores (2.9 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6; p < 0.001), and worse OHIP-14 (18.6 ± 4.7 vs. 15.9 ± 4.3 vs. 13.8 ± 4.8; p < 0.001). Clinically relevant malodor prevalence (organoleptic ≥ 2) was 96.9% in fixed braces, 79.3% in controls, and 66.1% in aligners (p < 0.001); because ≥2 was used as a broad descriptive threshold, these values should be interpreted as descriptive rather than diagnostic prevalence estimates. In adjusted models, greater tongue coating, higher plaque, and low salivary flow were associated with worse organoleptic severity, whereas appliance category did not remain independently associated with HALT once concurrent clinical correlates were included. Conclusions: Fixed braces showed higher unadjusted malodor burden and worse OHRQoL than aligners and untreated controls, but appliance category should be interpreted as a contextual exposure linked to plaque-retentive conditions rather than as a standalone causal determinant. Plaque accumulation, tongue coating, and lower salivary flow showed the strongest associations with worse malodor severity. These findings should be interpreted in light of the cross-sectional design, possible observer and selection bias, and residual confounding. Full article

Objectives: Class II malocclusion is a frequent orthodontic problem in growing patients, and understanding the dentoskeletal effects of different treatment approaches is essential for selecting the most appropriate therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) and the Rapid Maxillary Expander II (RME II) system in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, using an untreated control group. Methods: This study included 86 growing patients with skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion, divided into three groups: RME II (n = 28), CMA (n = 28), and untreated controls (n = 30). Lateral cephalograms were obtained at baseline (T0) and after Class II correction (T1). Skeletal and dentoalveolar variables were assessed, and intergroup differences in treatment changes were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Both treatment groups showed significantly greater reductions in overjet than the control group, with no significant difference between the two appliances. The CMA group showed a greater reduction in overbite, whereas the RME II group showed greater reductions in the A point–Nasion–B point (ANB) angle and greater increases in mandibular length (Condylion–Gnathion; Co-Gn) compared with both the control and CMA groups. Conclusions: Both appliances were effective in correcting Class II malocclusion during growth. However, the CMA was mainly associated with dentoalveolar correction and vertical changes, whereas the RME II system induced more evident skeletal modifications. Full article