Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (37)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = social return on investment (SROI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 26156 KB  
Article
Multi-Dimensional Benefit Evaluation of Urban Spaces Driven by Consumer Preferences
by Xin Zhang, Yi Yu and Lei Cao
Land 2025, 14(12), 2322; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122322 - 26 Nov 2025
Viewed by 241
Abstract
Against the backdrop of efforts to improve the quality of urban spatial stock, assessments of spatial benefits driven by consumption preferences integrate subjective decision-making and objective environmental factors to provide quantitative evidence for urban planning and public investment. This study constructed a “environment-perception–behavior” [...] Read more.
Against the backdrop of efforts to improve the quality of urban spatial stock, assessments of spatial benefits driven by consumption preferences integrate subjective decision-making and objective environmental factors to provide quantitative evidence for urban planning and public investment. This study constructed a “environment-perception–behavior” analytical framework grounded in SOR (stimulus–organism–response) theory. We combined structural equation modeling with the hedonic pricing method to identify causal pathways and quantify the marginal value of spatial elements. XGBoost was employed to uncover consumption-preference thresholds, Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) was used to identify spatial supply–demand relationships, and Social Return on Investment (SROI) was applied to evaluate multidimensional urban spatial benefits. The results showed that transportation accessibility, commercial diversity, green-space quality, and cultural ambiance significantly shaped distinct consumption preferences. Central urban areas approached supply saturation in commercial and daily consumption and exhibited diminishing marginal returns, whereas peripheral zones demonstrated greater potential for sports and cultural consumption. Based on these findings, we reveal the underlying logic of spatial benefit distribution and classify the study area into High-efficiency matching zones, transition matching zones, and potential zones. We further propose targeted optimization recommendations that can inform policy on urban spatial functional positioning and social investment and provide evaluation criteria for prioritizing interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 709 KB  
Article
Prevalence of Diabetes Among First-Time Ophthalmology Patients at a Nonprofit Hospital in Mexico
by Valeria Sánchez-Huerta, Mary Lady González Suriel, Héctor Randolph, María José Barragán Álvarez and Benjamin Aleman-Castilla
Diagnostics 2025, 15(22), 2922; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222922 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 347
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Diabetes is Mexico’s second-leading cause of death, primary cause of disability, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) associated with this disease is the leading cause of vision loss among the working population. Limited healthcare funding and inequitable access hinder diagnosis and treatment, leaving [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Diabetes is Mexico’s second-leading cause of death, primary cause of disability, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) associated with this disease is the leading cause of vision loss among the working population. Limited healthcare funding and inequitable access hinder diagnosis and treatment, leaving 32% undiagnosed and at risk of developing serious complications such as DR. With screening rates declining, nonprofits like the Association to Prevent Blindness in Mexico (APEC) play a crucial role in detecting diabetes and DR, reducing healthcare costs, and improving patient outcomes. Methods: This study analyzes data from over 25,000 first-time patients screened at APEC in 2023, providing a unique empirical resource on diabetes and DR in Mexico. Using the Social Return on Investment (SROI) approach, it evaluates program costs (medical resources, equipment, and personnel) against patient benefits. These benefits are quantified as the probability that newly diagnosed or uncontrolled diabetes patients begin treatment, thus preventing DR, weighted by the Value of Statistical Life (VSL). Results: Of the total screened patients, 17.2% had diabetes. Among them, 20.0% were unaware of their condition, while the remaining 80.0% knew their diagnosis. Notably, 25.8% of those who were aware of their diagnosis did not have diabetes under control. Considering all costs associated with the first-time ophthalmology patients screening program and assuming only a portion of patients would seek treatment, every peso invested by APEC has the potential to generate the equivalent to 542 pesos in patient well-being. When factoring in the subsequent costs of diabetes control treatment borne by the patients, the potential Benefit–Cost Ratio is estimated at 9:1. These results proved consistent to sensitivity analysis for key assumptions affecting the estimated benefits and costs. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that integrating routine diabetes screening into specialized ophthalmologic care can generate substantial social value through timely intervention, as early detection promotes better diabetes management and helps prevent complications beyond diabetic retinopathy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Eye Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1015 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Environmental Protection Plans in Quarrying Using the Social Return on Investment Framework
by Tochukwu A. Ngwu, Chinwe P. Oramah, Komsoon Somprasong and Chanapol Charoentanaworakun
Pollutants 2025, 5(4), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants5040042 - 4 Nov 2025
Viewed by 578
Abstract
Environmental Protection Plans (EPPs) are vital for mitigating the socio-ecological impacts of quarry operations, especially in emerging economies like Thailand, where rapid industrialization often intensifies air, water, noise, and land degradation. This study applies the social return on investment (SROI) framework to evaluate [...] Read more.
Environmental Protection Plans (EPPs) are vital for mitigating the socio-ecological impacts of quarry operations, especially in emerging economies like Thailand, where rapid industrialization often intensifies air, water, noise, and land degradation. This study applies the social return on investment (SROI) framework to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multi-domain EPPs implemented in a quarry. By applying compliance-based assessment and monetization of environmental and health co-benefits, annual economic outcomes were quantified for particulate matter (PM10), total dissolved solids (TDS), noise reduction, and carbon sequestration. The analysis revealed a high SROI ratio of 59.55:1, primarily driven by substantial health benefits from PM10 and noise abatement. This ratio also reflects consideration of investment from an annual operational cost, with a sensitivity analysis of incorporating an estimated capital expenditure, reducing the ratio to moderate value ranges of 5–10:1. A number of limitations, such as exclusion of capital costs, reliance on fixed proxies, and single-year scope, may overstate short-term returns, suggesting the application of stochastic methods for enhanced robustness. Overall, the findings demonstrate that EPPs deliver substantial economic and public health benefits, supporting their role in fostering community resilience and advancing sustainable operations in quarry sectors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1356 KB  
Article
A Holistic Sustainability Evaluation for Heritage Upcycling vs. Building Construction Projects
by Elena Fregonara, Chiara Senatore, Cristina Coscia and Francesca Pasquino
Real Estate 2025, 2(4), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate2040017 - 8 Oct 2025
Viewed by 699
Abstract
The paper contributes to the debate on the holistic sustainability assessment of real estate projects, integrating economic, financial, environmental, and social aspects. A methodological study is presented to support decision-making processes involving the preferability ranking of alternative investment scenarios: new building production vs. [...] Read more.
The paper contributes to the debate on the holistic sustainability assessment of real estate projects, integrating economic, financial, environmental, and social aspects. A methodological study is presented to support decision-making processes involving the preferability ranking of alternative investment scenarios: new building production vs. retrofitting the existing stock, in the context of urban transformation interventions. The study integrates life cycle approaches by introducing the social components besides the economic and environmental ones. Firstly, a composite unidimensional (monetary) indicator calculation is illustrated. The sustainability components are internalized in the NPV calculation through a Discounted Cash-Flow Analysis (DCFA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are suggested to assess the economic and environmental impacts, and the Social Return on Investment (SROI) to assess the intervention’s extra-financial value. Secondly, a methodology based on multicriteria techniques is proposed. The Hierarchical Analytical Process (AHP) model is suggested to harmonize various performance indicators. Focus is placed on the criticalities emerging in both the methodological approaches, while highlighting the relevance of multidimensional approaches in decision-making processes and for supporting urban policies and urban resilience. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2070 KB  
Article
The Social Return Ratio and Behavioral Success from Groundwater Development for Mitigating Against PM2.5 Pollution from Forest Fires in Ko, Li, Lamphun
by Chinnawat Katsakul and Charuk Singhapreecha
Sustainability 2025, 17(18), 8393; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188393 - 19 Sep 2025
Viewed by 953
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the Ban Ko Groundwater Development Project in Li District, Lamphun Province, which seeks to address PM2.5 pollution from forest fires through rural economic development. The Social Return on Investment (SROI) approach was applied to assess the project’s social [...] Read more.
This study aims to evaluate the Ban Ko Groundwater Development Project in Li District, Lamphun Province, which seeks to address PM2.5 pollution from forest fires through rural economic development. The Social Return on Investment (SROI) approach was applied to assess the project’s social return ratio (SRR), revealing that the intervention lacked cost-effectiveness and did not yield sufficient social or economic returns on investment. Decision Tree analysis indicated that economic benefits significantly influenced positive behavioral change toward environmental conservation; however, the magnitude of this change was insufficient to generate substantial environmental improvements. Furthermore, the application of the Collective Interest Model (CIM) revealed that several social factors including personal pro-environmental tendencies, perceived group efficacy, civic responsibility, economic incentives, education, and age contributed to individuals’ decisions to engage in environmental problem-solving. These findings suggest that future economic development efforts must be integrated with social dimensions to foster sustainable environmental solutions in rural contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 683 KB  
Article
Impact Assessment in the Wine Industry: Potential and Limitations of the Social Return on Investment (SROI)
by Paolo Landoni and Angelo Moratti
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(9), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15090346 - 3 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1146
Abstract
As sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility gained increasing importance in agriculture, several impact assessment methodologies have been proposed. Social Return on Investment (SROI), a methodology used for understanding, measuring, and reporting the social, economic, and environmental value created by an organization, emerged as [...] Read more.
As sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility gained increasing importance in agriculture, several impact assessment methodologies have been proposed. Social Return on Investment (SROI), a methodology used for understanding, measuring, and reporting the social, economic, and environmental value created by an organization, emerged as a promising approach to quantify and monetize social and environmental impacts. However, research on SROI application within the wine industry remains limited, despite the sector’s global relevance and unique economic, social, and cultural dimensions. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the potential and limitations of SROI in assessing the social impact of a wine cellar’s products, services, and activities on its stakeholders. Indeed, we find confirmation that, as in other sectors, this methodology can support sustainability reporting and strategic decision-making. Applying the SROI methodology, stakeholder outcomes were analyzed, and the results indicate that for every EUR 1 invested, approximately EUR 1.44 of social value is generated, demonstrating SROI’s effectiveness in capturing social contributions beyond financial metrics. This study highlights SROI’s advantages, while also acknowledging challenges. Findings suggest that, despite some limitations, SROI can enhance wineries’ sustainability strategies and offers a robust framework to guide wineries—and potentially other agricultural sectors—toward socially responsible and sustainable practices. Future research should focus on developing industry-specific proxies and integrating SROI with other sustainability assessment tools, particularly in support of ESG reporting. This study contributes to academic discourse on impact evaluation methodologies and provides practical implications that aim to balance economic performance with social responsibility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 944 KB  
Article
Health Economics-Informed Social Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis of a Nature-Based Social Prescribing Craft and Horticulture Programme for Mental Health and Well-Being
by Holly Whiteley, Mary Lynch, Ned Hartfiel, Andrew Cuthbert, William Beharrell and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081184 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1935
Abstract
Demand for mental health support has exerted unprecedented pressure on statutory services. Innovative solutions such as Green or Nature-Based Social Prescribing (NBSP) programmes may help address unmet need, improve access to personalised treatment, and support the sustainable delivery of primary services within a [...] Read more.
Demand for mental health support has exerted unprecedented pressure on statutory services. Innovative solutions such as Green or Nature-Based Social Prescribing (NBSP) programmes may help address unmet need, improve access to personalised treatment, and support the sustainable delivery of primary services within a prevention model of population health. We piloted an innovative health economics-informed Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis and forecast of a ‘Making Well’ therapeutic craft and horticulture programme for mental health between October 2021 and March 2022. Quantitative and qualitative outcome data were collected from participants with mild-to-moderate mental health conditions at baseline and nine-weeks follow-up using a range of validated measures, including the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and a bespoke Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). The acceptability and feasibility of these measures were explored. Results indicate that the Making Well programme generated well-being-related social value in the range of British Pound Sterling (GBP) GBP 3.30 to GBP 4.70 for every GBP 1 invested. Our initial pilot forecast suggests that the programme has the potential to generate GBP 5.40 to GBP 7.70 for every GBP 1 invested as the programme is developed and delivered over a 12-month period. Despite the small sample size and lack of a control group, our results contribute to the evidence-base for the effectiveness and social return on investment of NBSP as a therapeutic intervention for improving health and well-being and provides an example of the use of health economic well-being outcome measures such as ICECAP-A and CSRIs in social value analysis. Combining SROI evaluation and forecast methodologies with validated quantitative outcome measures used in the field of health economics can provide valuable social cost–benefit evidence to decision-makers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 901 KB  
Article
A New Integrated Framework to Assess the Impact of Social Farming on Sustainability and Rural Development: A Case Study in Lazio
by Francesco Basset, Francesca Giarè, Saverio Senni and Barbara Soriano
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1715; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041715 - 18 Feb 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1517
Abstract
The importance of social farming (SF) is known in the literature, yet there is a lack of suitable tools for evaluating and monitoring these practices. Moreover, there is also a lack of data and information about the outcomes of the experiences and the [...] Read more.
The importance of social farming (SF) is known in the literature, yet there is a lack of suitable tools for evaluating and monitoring these practices. Moreover, there is also a lack of data and information about the outcomes of the experiences and the impact they have on various stakeholders. Consequently, it is difficult to understand the extent to which SF can contribute to the achievement of sustainability and rural development goals. This study proposes an integrated framework to evaluate social farming practices, combining different methodologies such as SWOT analysis, Business Model Canvas (BMC), Social Return on Investment (SROI), and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The research evaluated a regional initiative in Lazio Region (Italy), aimed at the socio-occupational integration of disadvantaged individuals through SF networks. Data collection involved 127 stakeholders through interviews and focus groups. Through the integration of SWOT analysis and BMC, the strong influence of the local contexts and project leaders on the impacts of SF is shown. In addition, the integration of AHP with SROI highlights how to address the limitations in quantifying social, economic, and environmental benefits, thus improving the accuracy of impact assessments. Finally, the results underline the need for policies that ensure the continuity and scalability of SF projects, highlighting the central role of the farm in sustainable socio-occupational inclusion. The study contributes to the advancement of SF evaluation methodologies and informs future policy development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development of Agricultural Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 723 KB  
Article
Social Return on Investment (SROI) Evaluation of Citizens Advice on Prescription: A Whole-Systems Approach to Mitigating Poverty and Improving Wellbeing
by Rachel Granger, Ned Hartfiel, Victory Ezeofor, Katharine Abba, Rhiannon Corcoran, Rachel Anderson de Cuevas, Benjamin Barr, Aregawi Gebremedhin Gebremariam, Roberta Piroddi, Clare Mahoney, Mark Gabbay and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(2), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020301 - 17 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3322
Abstract
Citizens Advice on Prescription (CAP), a Liverpool (UK)-based service, provides welfare advice and link worker social prescription support to people experiencing and at risk of experiencing financial or social hardship. CAP, which receives referrals from healthcare and third-sector services, aims to improve service [...] Read more.
Citizens Advice on Prescription (CAP), a Liverpool (UK)-based service, provides welfare advice and link worker social prescription support to people experiencing and at risk of experiencing financial or social hardship. CAP, which receives referrals from healthcare and third-sector services, aims to improve service users’ financial security, health, and wellbeing. A mixed-methods social return on-investment (SROI) analysis was used to evaluate this service. Between May 2022 and November 2023, a subset of service users (n = 538) completed the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Survey (SWEMWBS) at baseline and a 2-month follow-up. Supporting quantitative and qualitative economic data were also collected (February 2023–February 2024) through semi-structured interviews (n = 16). Changes in social value were determined by comparing pre- and post-SWEMWBS scores. These scores were then mapped to monetary values using the Mental Health Social Value Bank (MHSVB). SROI ratios were then calculated by dividing the change in social value by the associated service provision costs. The mean social value change per person ranged from GBP 505.70 to GBP 697.52, and the mean service provision cost was GBP 148.66 per person. The overall study reported a positive SROI return range of GBP 1: GBP 3.40–GBP 4.69. The results indicate that non-clinical support services, like CAP, may be an effective intervention for addressing the wider determinants of health and wellbeing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3rd Edition: Social Determinants of Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 498 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Well-Being Benefits and Social Value of Volunteer Gardening: Health Economics Meets Behavioral Science
by Holly Whiteley, John Parkinson, Ned Hartfiel, Abraham Makanjuola, Huw Lloyd-Williams, Catherine Lawrence and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121233 - 21 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2617
Abstract
Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to strengthening the evidence base for multifaceted illness prevention interventions. We bring together health economics and behavioral science to explore the well-being benefits and social cost–benefit of volunteer gardening at an accredited botanic garden, Wales, UK. A health economics-informed [...] Read more.
Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to strengthening the evidence base for multifaceted illness prevention interventions. We bring together health economics and behavioral science to explore the well-being benefits and social cost–benefit of volunteer gardening at an accredited botanic garden, Wales, UK. A health economics-informed social return on investment (SROI) evaluation was combined with the assessment of volunteers’ basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness), connection to nature, and their interrelatedness in this innovative nature-based intervention study. Pre- and post-volunteering outcome data were collected using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS), the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A), the 12-item diary version of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSNF), the Nature Connection Index (NCI), and a bespoke Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). Results indicate that volunteer gardening can provide well-being benefits to participants and cost savings to the NHS. The well-being benefits observed were estimated to generate social value in the range of GBP 4.02 to GBP 5.43 for every GBP 1 invested. This study contributes to the evidence base that simple nature-based interventions such as volunteer gardening could offer low-cost supportive environments that deliver significant well-being benefits and associated social value to local communities, including a reduced burden on overstretched local healthcare services. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Psychology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5191 KB  
Article
Visionary Nature-Based Solutions Evaluated through Social Return on Investment: The Case Study of an Italian Urban Green Space
by Elisa-Elena Vasiliu, Sara Torabi Moghadam, Adriano Bisello and Patrizia Lombardi
Smart Cities 2024, 7(2), 946-972; https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020040 - 20 Apr 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4661
Abstract
Cities are facing challenges in adaptation to, and mitigation of climate change. Urban Green Spaces (UGS) have a pivotal role in this transformative process and are almost always coupled with digital tools. The deployment of digital solutions, encompassing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) [...] Read more.
Cities are facing challenges in adaptation to, and mitigation of climate change. Urban Green Spaces (UGS) have a pivotal role in this transformative process and are almost always coupled with digital tools. The deployment of digital solutions, encompassing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and the Internet of Things (IoT), seeks to increase awareness of UGS benefits across a wider range of users. This study is part of a Horizon 2020 project that aims to measure the social impact of Visionary Solutions (VS), i.e., combined Nature Based Solutions (NBSs) and Digital Solutions (DSs), in UGSs located in seven European cities. The project proposes a novel application of the Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to forecast the impact of VS implementation in the case of an Italian demonstration. The three main objectives are: (i) establishing a causal chain for transformation through the Theory of Change (ToC) tool; (ii) quantifying the expected change by developing two monetary alternatives; and (iii) comparing these alternatives to assess which is more influential in stakeholders’ decision-making. The authors reviewed a range of financial proxies of social outcomes from other SROI case studies. The result of the Italian demonstration is that, for each euro invested in project solutions, two euros of social return are generated. The analysis reveals these monetized intangible outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1824 KB  
Systematic Review
Social Impact Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions
by Leah Feor, Amelia Clarke and Ilona Dougherty
World 2023, 4(4), 816-837; https://doi.org/10.3390/world4040051 - 1 Dec 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 21699
Abstract
This paper explores the current state of the social impact measurement (SIM) field to better understand common practices in measuring the post-intervention social impact of a program or project and to identify strategies to improve measurement in practice. This study employed a systematic [...] Read more.
This paper explores the current state of the social impact measurement (SIM) field to better understand common practices in measuring the post-intervention social impact of a program or project and to identify strategies to improve measurement in practice. This study employed a systematic literature review. Articles were manually coded deductively and inductively in NVivo to complete a descriptive and thematic analysis of the literature. The thematic analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the SIM field. We found that similarities existed across the definitions of social impact (e.g., environmental impact is part of social impact). Additionally, social return on investment (SROI) is the most common measurement model and theory of change was identified as a core concept across SIM literature. Strategies are presented for practitioners to consider when measuring social impact, including: (i) engage stakeholders throughout the process, (ii) mobilize existing operational data, (iii) increase measurement capacity, and (iv) use both qualitative and quantitative data. This study reveals the nuances of SIM based on academic literature published across the globe over the span of a decade. It places emphasis on the post-intervention stage and identifies strategies to improve the application of measurement models in practice. Lastly, it outlines future research directions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 4020 KB  
Article
Estimating Benefits of Microtransit for Social Determinants of Health: A Social Return on Investment System Dynamics Model
by Mohammad Maleki and Janille Smith-Colin
Systems 2023, 11(11), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11110538 - 4 Nov 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4722
Abstract
Lack of transportation services in low-income communities greatly affects people’s health and well-being, creating barriers to social determinants of health (SDOH). One potential solution that has gained the attention of US decision-makers in recent years is microtransit, a transportation intervention aimed at addressing [...] Read more.
Lack of transportation services in low-income communities greatly affects people’s health and well-being, creating barriers to social determinants of health (SDOH). One potential solution that has gained the attention of US decision-makers in recent years is microtransit, a transportation intervention aimed at addressing this issue. Despite promising results from prior microtransit implementation, the extent to which these programs deliver social benefits remains uncertain. This study presents a novel model called Social Return on Investment System Dynamics (SROISD) to forecast the social benefits of a microtransit program in Holmes County, Mississippi. The SROISD model identifies the scope and key stakeholders, maps outcomes, and gives outcomes a value. A causal loop diagram is developed next based on mapped outcomes and a literature review, thereby conceptualizing the processes through which social benefits are gained from the microtransit program. Three stock and flow diagrams are then created from the causal loop diagram to formulate the system and produce results. Outcomes mapped relative to three SDOH areas (1) accessing healthcare, (2) accessing employment, and (3) social participation indicate an overall positive return from investing in microtransit within the low-income community of interest. Additionally, ridesharing demonstrates a significant positive correlation with the SROI ratio. These findings offer support for the advantages of investing in microtransit. Additionally, the SROISD methodology offers decisionmakers a dynamically responsive approach that integrates traditional return on investment methodologies with system dynamics to explore social benefits across a variety of impact categories. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Decision Making and Policy Analysis in Transportation Planning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 964 KB  
Article
Social Return on Investment of Nature-Based Activities for Adults with Mental Wellbeing Challenges
by Ned Hartfiel, Heli Gittins, Val Morrison, Sophie Wynne-Jones, Norman Dandy and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(15), 6500; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156500 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3352
Abstract
Increased time spent in nature can enhance physical health and mental wellbeing. The UK Government’s ‘25 Year Environment Plan’ recommends extending the health benefits of contact with nature to a wider group of people, including those with mental health challenges. This study investigated [...] Read more.
Increased time spent in nature can enhance physical health and mental wellbeing. The UK Government’s ‘25 Year Environment Plan’ recommends extending the health benefits of contact with nature to a wider group of people, including those with mental health challenges. This study investigated whether nature-based interventions (NBIs) for people with mild mental health challenges could generate a positive social return on investment (SROI). Between May 2017 and January 2019, 120 participants at six outdoor sites in Wales participated in a 6 to 12-week NBI, which consisted of a weekly 2- to 4-h session. Quantitative data were collected from baseline and follow-up questionnaires identifying participant demographics and measuring mental wellbeing, physical activity, self-efficacy, and social trust. Wellbeing valuation generated a range of social value ratios by applying the Housing Association Charitable Trust (HACT) Social Value Calculator (SVC 4.0) and HACT Mental Health Social Value Calculator (MHSVC 1.0). Seventy-four participants (62%) completed follow-up questionnaires at 6 months. SROI ratios were calculated using the SVC for physical activity, self-efficacy, and social trust. The MHSVC generated social value ratios for mental wellbeing. The base case results revealed a positive social value ratio for participants, ranging from British Pound Sterling (GBP) 2.57 to GBP 4.67 for every GBP 1 invested, indicating favourable outcomes in terms of value generated. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1377 KB  
Article
Emergency Animal Boarding: A Social Return on Investment
by Gemma C. Ma, Jioji Ravulo and Ursula McGeown
Animals 2023, 13(14), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142264 - 10 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4261
Abstract
Companion animals play a central role in many families and are especially valued by those who are socially isolated. Crisis situations such as acute hospitalizations, homelessness, and natural disasters can make it difficult to preserve the human–animal bond and can result in animals [...] Read more.
Companion animals play a central role in many families and are especially valued by those who are socially isolated. Crisis situations such as acute hospitalizations, homelessness, and natural disasters can make it difficult to preserve the human–animal bond and can result in animals being surrendered or euthanized. Social support programs like the RSPCA NSW Emergency Boarding and Homelessness program support people experiencing crisis situations with emergency pet boarding, access to veterinary treatment and individualized case management. This study aimed to estimate the social return on investment (SROI) for this program using the standard SROI methodology. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 program stakeholders and questionnaire responses were received from 29 program clients. Outcomes were quantified for four stakeholder groups: program clients, client’s animals, RSPCA Inspectors, animal pounds, and shelters. Clients and their animals experienced the bulk of the benefit from the program, estimated to have a combined value of over AUD 5 million for the 2020–2021 financial year. The estimated social return on investment was AUD 8.21 for each AUD 1 invested. The study demonstrates that keeping people together with their companion animals or ensuring they are reunited as soon as possible can reduce stressors and improve outcomes for people and animals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Companion Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop