Testimonials
What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
“It was indeed a pleasant experience to publish our review article with this journal. Instructions were very clear and timely processing of publication made this experience the enjoyable one.”
[...] Read more.
“It was indeed a pleasant experience to publish our review article with this journal. Instructions were very clear and timely processing of publication made this experience the enjoyable one.”
Article in Molecules:
Recent Developments in Chemical Synthesis with Biocatalysts in Ionic Liquids
Less
“I have published several times in Molecules and once in Marine Drugs and my impression as author is that the peer-review process has been very fast and helpful of the
[...] Read more.
“I have published several times in Molecules and once in Marine Drugs and my impression as author is that the peer-review process has been very fast and helpful of the referee comments. I definitively recommend these journals for the publication of quality papers.”
Article in Molecules:
Enantioselective Synthesis of cis-Decalins Using Organocatalysis and Sulfonyl Nazarov Reagents
Less
“I always enjoy the competent help and helpful attitude of the editorial office.”
[...] Read more.
“After 20 years of intense activity, Molecules (MDPI) gained a leading position among Open Access Journals in chemical science with an outstanding worldwide visibility. My previous positive experiences have been
[...] Read more.
“After 20 years of intense activity, Molecules (MDPI) gained a leading position among Open Access Journals in chemical science with an outstanding worldwide visibility. My previous positive experiences have been recently confirmed by a qualified peer-reviewed process and fast on-line publication.”
Article in Molecules:
Solvent-Free Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition under Mechanochemical Activation
Less
"I was positively impressed by the entire management of our article. The peer review process was very fast and reviewers' comments were fair and helpful. Also the printing process was
[...] Read more.
"I was positively impressed by the entire management of our article. The peer review process was very fast and reviewers' comments were fair and helpful. Also the printing process was very fast. The website to submit and handle manuscripts is efficient and easy to use. Communication with the Editorial Staff was excellent. I definitely recommend the journal for publication of high quality papers."
Article in Molecules:
Inorganic Mercury Sequestration by a Poly(ethylene imine) Dendrimer in Aqueous Solution
Less
"Hello, It was a pleasure to cooperate with MDPI and editorial stuff from journal Molecules. Conditions were clearly set, enough time was given to write the manuscript. Reviewing was straightforward
[...] Read more.
"Hello, It was a pleasure to cooperate with MDPI and editorial stuff from journal Molecules. Conditions were clearly set, enough time was given to write the manuscript. Reviewing was straightforward and (reasonably) fast, without prolongation. The price for publication was acceptable. Proofs were well done. Certainly good experience and base for next publication.”
Article in Molecules:
Normal Mode Analysis as a Routine Part of a Structural Investigation
Less
"I consider it an excellent experience to publish with MDPI. The process is well planned from the beginning. You just need to have a good manuscript. The evaluators and the
[...] Read more.
"I consider it an excellent experience to publish with MDPI. The process is well planned from the beginning. You just need to have a good manuscript. The evaluators and the editors make a great contribution to improve the work. The communication with the editor is fluid, friendly and very professional. The times are incredible. I congratulate your entire organization.”
Article in Molecules:
Carbon Nanotubes Having Haeckelite Defects as Potential Drug Carriers. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Less
"I am very happy to publish our research work on Molecules. The publication process is very fast and the editor is very kind. I got a number of reasonable suggestions
[...] Read more.
"I am very happy to publish our research work on Molecules. The publication process is very fast and the editor is very kind. I got a number of reasonable suggestions during the whole process. "
Article in Molecules:
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Rana chensinensis Oviduct
Less
“The reviews of my manuscript were highly informed and constructive, and I was very pleased with the quality of the production for publication.”
[...] Read more.
“The invitation to contribute to the special Life issue on ‘The Origins and Early Evolution of RNA’ came at a very opportune time for me. Recent results from my lab
[...] Read more.
“The invitation to contribute to the special Life issue on ‘The Origins and Early Evolution of RNA’ came at a very opportune time for me. Recent results from my lab in several areas had pointed to a new synthesis of interests I had developed over forty years. Writing the manuscript thus came naturally and allowed me to consider my research in a broader context. It was therefore an exciting experience to produce the manuscript. The Editors were most helpful and the peer review was pleasantly timely, thorough, and constructive. The reviewers’ suggestions allowed me to clarify, correct omissions I had made, and opened new directions that were consistent with what I hoped to accomplish with the manuscript.”
Article in Life:
What RNA World? Why a Peptide/RNA Partnership Merits Renewed Experimental Attention
Less
“I enjoyed the peer review process at Life. The review of our manuscript was fast and fair. I was impressed by the reviewer comments, which were constructive and helpful in
[...] Read more.
“I enjoyed the peer review process at Life. The review of our manuscript was fast and fair. I was impressed by the reviewer comments, which were constructive and helpful in improving our manuscript. Based on the comments, I could tell that all three reviewers of our manuscript are experts in the relevant fields of research. The editorial staff also responded to my emails and requests promptly.”
Article in Life:
Synthetic Biology: A Bridge between Artificial and Natural Cells
Less
“I very much am of the same opinion regarding the “prompt and positive peer review process” of the journal Life, as is reflected in most of the other comments here.
[...] Read more.
“I very much am of the same opinion regarding the “prompt and positive peer review process” of the journal Life, as is reflected in most of the other comments here. The review process was efficient and, I must insist, positive. The overall comments for our article were good. One reviewer, however, had a disagreement with the way our story was pitched. After one round of revision, when the disagreement persisted, the reviewer took the time to explain where he was coming from rather than treating our disagreement with negativity (we did get admonished a bit in the process)! This was refreshing, to say the least, and led to a revision in the ‘pitch of the story’ which, I must say, made our article more complete. We look forward to having a long and fruitful relationship with the journal! We appreciate the prompt responses from the editorial office. Finally, thanks to the EiC and Guest Editor for the opportunity that eventually led us to be a part of this special issue.”
Article in Life:
Characterization of RNA-Like Oligomers from Lipid-Assisted Nonenzymatic Synthesis: Implications for Origin of Informational Molecules on Early Earth
Less
Displaying testimonial 1061-1080 on page 54 of 65.