Biomarkers in Prostate Cancers

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biomarkers".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 June 2024 | Viewed by 3102

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
Interests: prostate cancer; robotic surgery; genetics; digital therapeutics; testosterone
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Prostate cancer represents a prevalent malignancy among men. The prominent prostate cancer biomarkers encompass prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its derivatives, which are proteins produced by prostate cells, as well as various genetic markers. These biomarkers play a pivotal role in facilitating the early detection, risk assessment, and monitoring of treatment responses. Recent research endeavors have primarily concentrated on innovative biomarkers capable of distinguishing between aggressive and indolent forms of prostate cancer, thus aiding in treatment decision making. Furthermore, liquid biopsies designed to detect circulating tumor cells or cell-free DNA exhibit a substantial potential for monitoring disease progression and assessing the responses to therapy. Biomarkers, such as the microbiome, miRNA, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), exosomes, and testosterone, may forecasting responses to anticancer treatments, which make them significance in enhancing treatments’ effectiveness and prostate cancer patients’ survival. As our comprehension of the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer advances, the exploration of novel biomarkers has the potential to revolutionize diagnostic and management approaches, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

This Special Issue serves to spotlight the present state of research pertaining to biomarkers in prostate cancer and the future prospects for enhancing diagnosis and treatment.

Prof. Dr. Shigeo Horie
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • PSA
  • androgen receptor
  • testosterone
  • DNA damage response
  • polygenic risk score
  • chromosomal aberration
  • telomere
  • MDSC

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 904 KiB  
Article
snRNAs from Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Have the Potential to Serve as Prognostic Factors for Clinical Recurrence after Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer
by Hikaru Mikami, Syunya Noguchi, Jun Akatsuka, Hiroya Hasegawa, Kotaro Obayashi, Hayato Takeda, Yuki Endo, Yuka Toyama, Hiroyuki Takei, Go Kimura, Yukihiro Kondo and Toshihiro Takizawa
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1757; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091757 - 1 May 2024
Viewed by 693
Abstract
In patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) after radical prostatectomy (RP), biochemical recurrence (BCR) increases the risk of distant metastasis. Accordingly, additional prognostic biomarkers are required to identify the subpopulation of patients with HRPC who develop clinical recurrence (CR) after BCR. The objective [...] Read more.
In patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) after radical prostatectomy (RP), biochemical recurrence (BCR) increases the risk of distant metastasis. Accordingly, additional prognostic biomarkers are required to identify the subpopulation of patients with HRPC who develop clinical recurrence (CR) after BCR. The objective of this study was to identify biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) RP samples that are prognostic for CR in patients with HRPC who experience BCR after RP (post-RP BCR). First, we performed a preliminary RNA sequencing analysis to comprehensively profile RNA expression in FFPE RP samples obtained from patients with HRPC who developed CR after post-RP BCR and found that many snRNAs were very abundant in preserved FFPE samples. Subsequently, we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to compare the expression levels of highly abundant snRNAs in FFPE RP samples from patients with HRPC with and without CR after post-RP BCR (21 CR patients and 46 non-CR patients who had more than 5 years of follow-up after BCR). The qPCR analysis revealed that the expression levels of snRNA RNU1-1/1-2 and RNU4-1 were significantly higher in patients with CR than in patients without CR. These snRNAs were significantly correlated with clinical recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HRPC who experienced post-RP BCR. Furthermore, snRNA RNU1-1/1-2 could serve as an independent prognostic factor for clinical RFS in post-RP BCR of HRPC cases where known prognostic factors (e.g., Gleason score) cannot distinguish between CR and non-CR patients. Our findings provide new insights into the involvement of snRNAs in prostate cancer progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Prostate Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1185 KiB  
Article
The Detection and Negative Reversion of Circulating Tumor Cells as Prognostic Biomarkers for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastases Treated by Enzalutamide
by So Nakamura, Masayoshi Nagata, Naoya Nagaya, Takeshi Ashizawa, Hisashi Hirano, Yan Lu, Hisamitsu Ide and Shigeo Horie
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040772 - 13 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 957
Abstract
Enzalutamide is a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor that increases overall survival (OS) rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study evaluates the efficacy of circulating tumor cell (CTC) status as a prognostic biomarker following enzalutamide administration. A retrospective subgroup analysis [...] Read more.
Enzalutamide is a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor that increases overall survival (OS) rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study evaluates the efficacy of circulating tumor cell (CTC) status as a prognostic biomarker following enzalutamide administration. A retrospective subgroup analysis and prognostic survey were conducted on 43 patients with mCRPC and bone metastases treated in Juntendo University-affiliated hospitals from 2015 to 2022. Patients were treated with 160 mg enzalutamide daily. CTC analyses on blood samples were performed regularly before and every three months after treatment. The relationship between the patients’ clinical factors and the OS rate was analyzed using the log-rank test; the median OS was 37 months. Patients with no detected CTCs at baseline showed significantly longer OS than those with detectable CTCs at baseline. Furthermore, patients demonstrating negative reversion of CTCs during enzalutamide treatment had significantly longer OS than patients with CTC-positivity. Two biomarkers—higher hemoglobin at baseline and achieving negative reversion of CTCs—were significantly associated with prolonged OS. This study suggests that patients achieving CTC-negative reversion during treatment for mCRPC with bone metastases exhibit improved long-term OS. Chronological measurement of CTC status might be clinically useful in the treatment of mCRPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Prostate Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 841 KiB  
Systematic Review
Biomarkers for Pre-Treatment Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
by José Pedro Sequeira, Sofia Salta, Rui Freitas, Rafael López-López, Ángel Díaz-Lagares, Rui Henrique and Carmen Jerónimo
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1363; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071363 - 30 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1114
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently occurring malignancies. Although most cases are not life-threatening, approximately 20% endure an unfavorable outcome. PSA-based screening reduced mortality but at the cost of an increased overdiagnosis/overtreatment of low-risk (lrPCa) and favorable intermediate-risk (firPCa) [...] Read more.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently occurring malignancies. Although most cases are not life-threatening, approximately 20% endure an unfavorable outcome. PSA-based screening reduced mortality but at the cost of an increased overdiagnosis/overtreatment of low-risk (lrPCa) and favorable intermediate-risk (firPCa) PCa. PCa risk-groups are usually identified based on serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), the Gleason score, and clinical T stage, which have consistent although variable specificity or subjectivity. Thus, more effective and specific tools for risk assessment are needed, ideally making use of minimally invasive methods such as liquid biopsies. In this systematic review we assessed the clinical potential and analytical performance of liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for pre-treatment risk stratification of PCa patients. Methods: Studies that assessed PCa pre-treatment risk were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and MedLine. PCa risk biomarkers were analyzed, and the studies’ quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: The final analysis comprised 24 full-text articles, in which case-control studies predominated, mostly reporting urine-based biomarkers (54.2%) and biomarker quantification by qPCR (41.7%). Categorization into risk groups was heterogeneous, predominantly making use of the Gleason score. Conclusion: This systematic review unveils the substantial clinical promise of using circulating biomarkers in assessing the risk for prostate cancer patients. However, the standardization of groups, categories, and biomarker validation are mandatory before this technique can be implemented. Circulating biomarkers might represent a viable alternative to currently available tools, obviating the need for tissue biopsies, and allowing for faster and more cost-effective testing, with superior analytical performance, specificity, and reproducibility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Prostate Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop