Next Article in Journal
Harnessing the Potential of Halogenated Natural Product Biosynthesis by Mangrove-Derived Actinomycetes
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Metabolomics Uncovers Metabolic Alterations Associated to Severe Oxidative Stress in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells Exposed to Ascididemin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chlorella 11-Peptide Inhibits the Production of Macrophage-Induced Adhesion Molecules and Reduces Endothelin-1 Expression and Endothelial Permeability

1
Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy & Science, 60 Erh-Te Rd, Sec. 1, Tainan 71710, Taiwan
2
Department of Pharmacy, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei 10341, Taiwan
3
Food and Drug Division, Department of Health, Taipei City Government, Taipei 11008, Taiwan
4
Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Rd, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2013, 11(10), 3861-3874; https://doi.org/10.3390/md11103861
Submission received: 6 August 2013 / Revised: 13 September 2013 / Accepted: 17 September 2013 / Published: 14 October 2013

Abstract

:
The inflammation process in large vessels involves the up-regulation of vascular adhesion molecules such as endothelial cell selectin (E-selectin), intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) which are also known as the markers of atherosclerosis. We have reported that Chlorella 11-peptide exhibited effective anti-inflammatory effects. This peptide with an amino sequence Val-Glu-Cys-Tyr-Gly-Pro-Asn-Arg-Pro-Gln-Phe was further examined for its potential in preventing atherosclerosis in this study. In particular, the roles of Chlorella 11-peptide in lowering the production of vascular adhesion molecules, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) from endothelia (SVEC4-10 cells) were studied. The production of E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and MCP-1 in SVEC4-10 cells was measured with ELISA. The mRNA expression of ET-1 was analyzed by RT-PCR and agarose gel. Results showed that Chlorella 11-peptide significantly suppressed the levels of E-selectin, ICAM, VCAM, MCP-1 as well as ET-1 gene expression. The inhibition of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 production by Chlorella 11-peptide was reversed in the presence of protein kinase A inhibitor (H89) which suggests that the cAMP pathway was involved in the inhibitory cause of the peptide. In addition, this peptide was shown to reduce the extent of increased intercellular permeability induced by combination of 50% of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated RAW 264.7 cells medium and 50% normal SEVC cell culture medium (referred to as 50% RAW-conditioned medium). These data demonstrate that Chlorella 11-peptide is a promising biomolecule in preventing chronic inflammatory-related vascular diseases.

1. Introduction

Circulating adhesion molecules (CAMs) are proteins expressed by vascular endothelium that are believed to play a role in the initiation of the atherosclerotic process. There are several families of CAMs, including integrins, cadherins, selectins and immunoglobulin superfamily members [1]. However, the most important adhesion molecules involved in atherosclerosis appear to be intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), endothelial cell selectin (E-selectin), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). An elevated level of ICAM-1 has shown to correlate to an increased risk of cardiovascular events [2]. E-selectin levels correlate with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk [3] and have been used successfully to predict the severity of atherosclerosis in patients [4]. VCAM-1 is a specific marker for advanced atherosclerosis, since it is often expressed in atherosclerotic plaques [5]. A high level of VCAM-1 is usually associated with an increased risk of coronary events in persons with existing CVD [2]. Studies also indicate that reducing the circulating level of these adhesion molecules could lower the CVD risk [6]. Up-regulation of the adhesion molecules on endothelial cells is prominent after these cells are exposed to pro-inflammatory molecules such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [7]. Initiated by MCP-1, the recruitment and activation of monocytes/macrophages are followed and contribute to the initiation and pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease [8,9]. In addition, MCP-1 is believed to be involved in the development of atherosclerosis [10], coronary artery disease [11], postischemic myocardial remodeling [12], and heart failure [13]. Research on anti-MCP-1 gene therapy has successfully gained the attenuation of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice [14], suggesting MCP-1 as a potential therapeutic target in atherosclerosis.
Furthermore, endothelin-1 (ET-1) secreted by vascular endothelial cells acts as a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor and has an important role in the etiology of atherosclerotic vascular disease [15]. When endothelia are under inflammation, their increased intercellular permeability would also permit cholesterol uptake within the vessel wall [15]. Therefore, reducing the elevated ET-1 expression and remaining endothelial intercellular permeability to normal has been demonstrated to be an effective approach to block the development of circulatory disorders, including hypertension and atherosclerosis [16].
Green algae are able to prevent hyperlipidemia induced by a high fat diet [17] and atherosclerosis in laboratory animals [18]. Additionally, Chlorella 11-peptide derived from the green algae demonstrates various biological effects. The components of the Chlorella 11-peptide are (Val-Glu-Cys-Tyr-Gly-Pro-Asn-Arg-Pro-Gln-Phe). It has recently been shown to decrease inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and Nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-κB) activity and to possess antioxidant properties [19,20]. Since atherosclerosis is known to be associated with an elevated cholesterol and chronic inflammation [21], examination of the relations between adhesion molecules, MCP-1, ET-1, endothelium membrane integrity with Chlorella 11-peptide would help to explore their therapeutic potential on atherosclerosis. In this study, the supernatant of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 culture was added to endothelial cells (SVEC4-10) for stimulation of these cells. This is because activation of macrophage produces pro-inflammatory cytokines required for the development of atherosclerosis [22]. After the stimuli to SVEC4-10, responses of endothelia with and without Chlorella 11-peptide were then evaluated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Inhibitory Effects of Chlorella 11-Peptide on LPS-Induced MCP-1 Production in RAW264.7 Macrophages

The difference of MCP-1 production between LPS-treated and basal groups reached a maximum at 12 h after LPS stimulation [23]. Therefore, this time point was chosen for further study (p < 0.005, Figure 1). The LPS-induced MCP-1 production was significantly inhibited (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05) by Chlorella 11-peptide (38 µM and 9 µM, respectively). Indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, also showed an inhibition on LPS-induced MCP-1 production. The inhibitory effect of indomethacin (0.25 mM) on MCP-1 production was found to be similar to that of Chlorella 11-peptide in a low dose (9 µM) but less potent in comparison to a high dose (38 µM) of Chlorella 11-peptide.
Studies have shown that LPS induces production of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) which contribute to vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis [19] and the occurrence of atherosclerosis is initiated by adhesion of monocytes to activated endothelial cells [21]. In the present study, we found that LPS significantly induced MCP-1 production in macrophages at 12 h (Figure 1). Therefore, the supernatant of LPS-stimulated macrophage cells cultured at 12 h was applied to induce adhesion molecules in SVEC4-10 endothelial cells and these induced molecules in relation to Chlorella 11-peptide can then be evaluated.

2.2. Inhibitory Effects of Chlorella 11-Peptide on E-Selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 Production Induced by 50% RAW-Conditioned Medium

Recombined MCP-1 and other proinflammatory cytokines (recombined TNF-α and IL-6), as mentioned in the introduction of the manuscript, are capable of inducing adhesion molecules. These evidences were all well demonstrated by others’ work and have been tested in our preliminary experiments (data not shown). In addition, in our experiments we also found that Chlorella 11-peptide-treated RAW medium was not able to induce adhesion molecules production as a control (data not shown). E-selectin production in SVEC4-10 endothelial cells was significantly induced by 50% RAW conditioned medium (p < 0.005, Figure 2). Both the high (38 µM) and the low (9 µM) concentrations of Chlorella 11-peptide were able to significantly decrease the E-selectin production (p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, indomethacin did not affect the production of E-selectin induced by 50%RAW-conditioned medium. There was about a 5-fold increase in ICAM-1 production when SVEC4-10 endothelial cells were stimulated with 50%RAW-conditioned medium (Figure 3). The increased ICAM-1 production was significantly inhibited by Chlorella 11-peptide and indomethacin (p < 0.005, Figure 3). VCAM-1 production was also induced with 50% RAW-conditioned medium (Figure 4). Notably, neither the low concentration of Chlorella 11-peptide nor indomethacin exhibited any inhibition on VCAM-1 induction. However, the high concentration of Chlorella 11-peptide significantly suppressed the VCAM-1 production (p < 0.005).
Figure 1. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) production. RAW264.7 cells (n = 8) were treated with LPS (1 µg/mL) with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 6 h prior to MCP-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for LPS-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005 and 9 M of Chlorella 11-peptide and indomethacin * p < 0.05, compared to LPS-stimulated group.
Figure 1. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) production. RAW264.7 cells (n = 8) were treated with LPS (1 µg/mL) with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 6 h prior to MCP-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for LPS-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005 and 9 M of Chlorella 11-peptide and indomethacin * p < 0.05, compared to LPS-stimulated group.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g001
Normally E-selectin expressed by endothelial cells is low but cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and bacterial endotoxin can elicit its expression [24]. ICAM-1 is constitutively expressed on endothelial cells in most regional vascular beds, and its expression can be significantly increased with cytokines or bacterial endotoxin. In comparison with ICAM-1, VCAM-1 predominantly mediates the adhesion of lymphocytes and monocytes upon stimulation [25]. Amberger et al. reported a low VCAM-1 gene expression of human umbilical vein endothelial cells after TNF-α stimulation [26]. Importantly, all of these elevated adhesion molecules in positive relation to atherosclerosis were substantially reduced by the presence of Chlorella 11-peptide (38 µM). Indomethacin is a potent antiinflammatory agent. However, its inhibitory effects on proinflammatory cytokine-induced adhesion molecules (e.g., E-selectin, VCAM-1) were not as effective as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 4. Moreover, compared to indomethacin (Figure 4), Chlorella 11-peptide can effectively alleviate both the production of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 which are responsible for leukocyte transmigration (ICAM-1) and leukocyte-endothelium signal transduction (VCAM-1) [27,28].
Cyclic AMP is a ubiquitous regulator of inflammatory and immune reactions. Mediation of cell cross talk through adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1, E-selectin, VCAM-1) has been reported to be dependent on intracellular cAMP [29,30,31]. In this study, we used an inhibitor of protein kinase A, H89 [26], to study whether inhibitory effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 production were mediated via the cAMP pathway. We showed that addition of H89 can compromise the inhibitory effects of Chlorella 11-pepetide on the induced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 production (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This indicates that cAMP pathway was likely involved in the inhibitory actions of the peptide. The counteraction of H89 to indomethacin on the induced VCAM-1 production was not observed (Figure 4). The possible explanation is that Indomethacin requires much higher concentration (above 20 mM) to inhibit cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity [32], which is much higher than the concentration (0.25 mM) used in this study.
Figure 2. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced E-selectin production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to E-selectin concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005 and 9 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide ** p < 0.01, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Figure 2. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced E-selectin production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to E-selectin concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005 and 9 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide ** p < 0.01, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g002
Figure 3. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced ICAM-1 production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to ICAM-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 9 µM and 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide, and indomethacin ### p < 0.005 compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide+H89 and indomethacin+H89, *** p < 0.005, compared to 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide and indomethacin.
Figure 3. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced ICAM-1 production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to ICAM-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 9 µM and 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide, and indomethacin ### p < 0.005 compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide+H89 and indomethacin+H89, *** p < 0.005, compared to 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide and indomethacin.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g003
Figure 4. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced VCAM-1 production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 6 h prior to VCAM-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide, *** p < 0.005 compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide+H89, ### p < 0.005, compared to 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide.
Figure 4. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced VCAM-1 production. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 6 h prior to VCAM-1 concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide, *** p < 0.005 compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide+H89, ### p < 0.005, compared to 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g004

2.3. Inhibitory Effects of Chlorella 11-Peptide on Endothelin-1 Gene Expression

The addition of 50% RAW-conditioned medium strongly induced the endothelin-1 (ET-1) mRNA expression in SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (p < 0.005, Figure 5). This induction of ET-1 gene expression can be significantly inhibited by the high dose of Chlorella 11-peptide (p < 0.005) and indomethacin (p < 0.01).
ET-1 mRNA expression was reported to be elevated in the artery with atherosclerotic lesion [16]. Antagonism of the ET-1 receptors was able to reduce the atherosclerotic lesion formation [33]. Thus, blocking ET-1 has been considered to be a strategy for prevention of atherosclerosis [15]. In this study, data showed that Chlorella 11-peptide is able to significantly suppress the ET-1 mRNA expression and holds a great potential in anti-atherosclerosis uses.
Figure 5. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced endothelin-1 mRNA expression. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to total RNA extraction and PCR were performed. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005 compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** P < 0.005 and indomethacin ** p < 0.01, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Figure 5. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced endothelin-1 mRNA expression. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to total RNA extraction and PCR were performed. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005 compared to the basal; 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** P < 0.005 and indomethacin ** p < 0.01, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g005

2.4. Inhibitory Effects of Chlorella 11-Peptide on Intercellular Permeability of Endothelia

After stimuli of 50% RAW-conditioned medium, the SVEC4-10 endothelial intercellular permeability showed a great increase (p < 0.005, Figure 6). Both the high and the low doses of Chlorella 11-peptide inhibited the increased intercellular permeability (p < 0.005). Moreover, this inhibition on the intercellular permeability was not observed in the indomethacin-treated group.
Endothelial permeability is controlled in part by the dynamic opening and closing of endothelial cell-cell junctions which relates to the interactions between endothelial cells and the extracellular matrix [34,35]. Increased endothelial permeability to lipoproteins or immune cells is considered as an initiating step of atherosclerosis pathogenesis, and the accumulation of debris in the intima would result in atherosclerotic plaques [21]. Therefore, maintaining the endothelial permeability unaffected by proinflammatory cells would help to decrease the plaque formation [36]. Our permeability assay showed that Chlorella 11-peptide possesses a potent ability to inhibit the increased intercellular permeability of SVEC4-10 endothelia induced by 50% RAW-conditioned medium (Figure 6), which indicates the effectiveness of the peptide in preventing the development of atherosclerosis.
Figure 6. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced intercellular permeability. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to E-selectin concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 9 µM and 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Figure 6. Effects of Chlorella 11-peptide on 50% RAW-conditioned medium-induced intercellular permeability. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (n = 8) were treated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium with and without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 and 38 µM) or indomethacin (0.25 mM) for 24 h prior to E-selectin concentration being measured. Statistics are shown for 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated cells ### p < 0.005, compared to the basal; 9 µM and 38 µM of Chlorella 11-peptide *** p < 0.005, compared to 50% RAW-conditioned medium-treated group.
Marinedrugs 11 03861 g006

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Dulbecco’s modified eagles medium (DMEM), sodium pyruvate and non-essential amino acid were purchased from Gibco BRL (Taipei, Taiwan). Indomethacin (I17378), papain, pepsin, Bradford reagent (B6919), and H89 were purchased from Sigma (Taipei, Taiwan). Flavourzyme Type A and alcalase were purchased from Novo Nordisk (Taipei, Taiwan). A Total RNA Miniprep System (Viogene BioTek Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan) and Access RT-PCR (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) were used for RT-PCR. MCP-1, VCAM, ICAM and E-selectin ELISA assay kits were products from R&D systems (Taipei, Taiwan). All chemicals were dissolved in sterilized deionized H2O except for indomethacin in 95% aqueous ethanol and pepsin in cold 10 mM HCl (4 mg mL1).

3.2. Chlorella-11 Peptide Preparation

The Chlorella-11 peptide of Chlorella pyrenoidosa was prepared from algal protein waste essentially as described previously [19,20]. The algal protein waste was obtained from the insoluble material after hot water extraction of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Then, the algal protein waste (10%, w/v) was digested with commercial proteases (pepsin, flavourzyme, alcalase, and papain) at the concentration of 0.2% (w/v) for 15 h at the designate pH and temperature for each enzyme reaction, using the reaction conditions provided by the manufacturer. At the end of the reaction, the digestion was heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min in order to inactivate the enzyme. The resulted non-soluble material was subsequently spray-dried and was extracted with methanol (1:10 w/v) for three times. After being concentrated, the MeOH-extracted fraction was then extracted by distilled water again prior to freeze-drying.
The isolation and purification of Chlorella 11-peptide was as described previously with modification [19,20]. Briefly, ammonium sulfate was added to precipitate proteins and the precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation (10,000× g, 30 min) and dissolved in a small volume of distilled water. The solution was fractionated using a Sephacryl S-100 high HR column (ϕ 2.6 × 70 cm) to detect peptides at OD 210 nm. The fraction was collected and subsequently loaded onto a Q-sepharose Fast Flow column (ϕ 2.6 × 40 cm), which was pre-equilibrated with a 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH 7.8). The separation was performed with 1.0 M NaCl in the same buffer solution and fractions were collected, dialyzed in deionized water, and lyophilized. The peptide concentration was determined with Pierce micro BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The molecular weight of peptides was determined by using a Superdex peptide HR 10/30 column at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The standard curve was established with cytochrome c (MW 12327 Da), approtonin (MW 6500 Da), gastrin (MW 2098 Da) and Leu-Gly (MW 188 Da).
The peptide fraction was further separated successively by a reversed-phase HPLC column, and a purified peptide was attained. The purity and identity of the final preparation was confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis on an Agilent 6510 Q-TOF mass spectrometer (>95%) and Edman degradation (see Supplementary Information). The sequence of Chlorella 11-peptide was determined as Val-Glu-Cys-Tyr-Gly-Pro-Asn-Arg-Pro-Gln-Phe, with a molecular mass of 1309 Da. In later parts of our work, we used the synthetic peptide provided by Kelowna International Scientific Inc. (Taiwan).

3.3. RAW264.7 Macrophage Culture

Macrophage RAW264.7 (ATCC number: TIB-71) cells were obtained from Bioresource Collection & Research Center (Taiwan) and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Hyclone), 2 mM glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acid, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cells were cultured and maintained in 75T flasks (1 × 107 cells/dish) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

3.4. MCP-1 Assay

The RAW264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates. Subsequently, the cells were incubated in the presence of LPS (1 µg/mL) with/without Chlorella 11-peptide (9 µM and 38 µM) for 12 hours prior to the culture medium was collected for MCP-1 measurement. This culture supernatant (without peptide treatment) was also taken to prepare “50% RAW-conditioned medium” (see the next section). The concentration range of Chlorella 11-peptide was chosen based on our previous finding [19]. Indomethacin (0.25 mM) was used as a positive control. MCP-1 levels in culture media were determined with commercial ELISA assay kits.

3.5. Adhesion Molecules—E-Selectin, ICAM-1 & VCAM-1 Level Measurements in SVEC4-10 Endothelial cells

SVEC4-10 cells (ATCC number: CRL-2181), which are well differentiated, responding like normal endothelial cells to some interleukins and to extracellular matrix signals for tube-like differentiation. SVEC4-10 was demonstrated to retain morphological and functional characteristics of normal EC [37]. SVEC4-10 endothelial cells were obtained from Bioresource Collection & Research Center (Taiwan) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cells were maintained in 100 mm petri dishes at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The SVEC4-10 cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates overnight prior to treatments. For stimuli, the culture medium of SVEC4-10 cells was changed to “50% RAW-conditioned medium” (made of equal volume of SVEC4-10 medium and the supernatant of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 culture medium) with and without Chlorella 11-peptide. Indomethacin was dissolved in 95% ethanol and applied as a positive control and cells were incubated for further 24 h prior to E-selectin and ICAM-1 assays and 6 h prior to VCAM-1 assay. The concentration of these adhesion molecules were measured with commercial ELISA assay kits.

3.6. Endothelin-1 mRNA Analysis by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

SVEC4-10 endothelial cells (2 × 105 cells/mL) in a 100 mm dish were stimulated with 50% RAW-conditioned medium in the presence of Chlorella 11-peptide and incubated for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted by using a GENTRA RNA isolation kit (R-5000A, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The RNA was reverse transcribed using a first strand cDNA synthesis kit for RT-PCR (Access RT-PCR system, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Semi-quantitative PCR was performed using primers for mouse ET-1 (forward, 5′-AAGCGCTGTTCCTGTTCTTCA-3′; reverse, 5′-CTTGATGCTATTGCTGATGG-3′) and housekeeping gene β-actin (forward, 5′-GTGGGCCGCTCAGGCCA-3′; reverse, 5′-CTCAGCTGTGGTGGTGAAGC-3′). Reaction products were examined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. Densitometric analysis was performed using the Alpha Imager 2000 Documentation & Analysis System (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA, USA).

3.7. BSA Transwell Permeability Assay

SVEC4-10 cells were seeded (1 × 105 cells/insert) on gelatin-coated (1%) polystyrene filters (Costar Transwell, pore size = 0.4 mm, Corning Inc., Taiwan), allowed to grow to confluence on Transwell inserts and then replaced with FBS-free medium for additional 3 h [38]. An FBS-free medium containing 10 mg/mL BSA was placed into the upper compartment and an FBS-free medium without BSA was placed in the lower compartment of the Transwell. The transfer rate across the cell monolayer was assessed by measuring the increased amount of BSA in the lower compartment after 30 min. BSA was quantified using Bradford reagent.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Data of results (n ≥ 8) from different experimental days were statistically analyzed for MCP-1, E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and intercellular permeability assays using Prism software (GraphPAD Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A two-tailed Student’s unpaired test was applied to compare the mean values of two populations of continuous data. The normal distribution and variance of each group was the same. Electrophoresis gel data were performed (n ≥ 3) and a representative example is shown in the results.

4. Conclusions

The expression of various CAMs by activated endothelial cells is a rate-determining step in recruiting inflammatory cells and plays a pivotal role in the progress of CVD [6,24]. Our previous study clearly showed that peptides from Chlorella are a very effective inhibitor of TNF-α and IL-6 production in macrophages [19]. In this study, we further demonstrate that Chlorella 11-peptide could not only prevent LPS-induced MCP-1 production in RAW264.7 macrophages, but also effectively inhibit the production of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells. In addition, this peptide exhibited to alleviate ET-1 mRNA expression and maintain endothelial permeability unaffected under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines. By combining these results, Chlorella 11-peptide may become a potential biomolecule in ameliorating the development of atherosclerosis.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 101-2113-M-194-002) and Taipei City Hospital of Taiwan for providing the research funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kacimi, R.; Karliner, J.S.; Koudssi, F.; Long, C.S. Expression and regulation of adhesion molecules in cardiac cells by cytokines response to acute hypoxia. Circ. Res. 1998, 82, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Blankenberg, S.; Barbaux, S.; Tiret, L. Adhesion molecules and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2003, 170, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ridker, P.M.; Buring, J.E.; Rifai, N. Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation 2001, 103, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nasuno, A.; Matsubara, T.; Hori, T.; Higuchi, K.; Imai, S.; Nakagawa, I.; Tsuchida, K.; Ozaki, K.; Mezaki, T.; Tanaka, T.; et al. Levels of soluble E-selectin and ICAM-1 in the coronary circulation of patients with stable coronary artery disease: Association with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Jpn. Heart. J. 2002, 43, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blake, G.J.; Ridker, P.M. Inflammatory bio-markers and cardiovascular risk prediction. J. Int. Med. 2002, 252, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tardif, J.C.; Grégoire, J.; Lavoie, M.A.; L’Allier, P.L. Vascular protectants for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. 2003, 1, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wilcox, J.N.; Nelken, N.A.; Coughlin, S.R.; Gordon, D.; Schall, T.J. Local expression of inflammatory cytokines in human atherosclerotic plaques. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 1994, 1, S10–S13. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gown, A.M.; Tsukada, T.; Ross, R. Human atherosclerosis: II. Immunocytochemical analysis of the cellular composition of human atherosclerotic lesions. Am. J. Pathol. 1986, 125, 191–207. [Google Scholar]
  9. Deo, R.; Khera, A.; McGuire, D.K.; Murphy, S.A.; Meo Neto, J.P.; Morrow, D.A.; de Lemos, J.A. Association among plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and subclinical atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 44, 1792–1800. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sheikine, Y.; Hansson, G.K. Chemokines and atherosclerosis. Ann. Med. 2004, 36, 98–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hayashidani, S.; Tsutsui, H.; Shiomi, T.; Ikeuchi, M.; Matsusaka, H.; Suematsu, N.; Wen, J.; Egashira, K.; Takeshita, A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates left ventricular remodeling and failure after experimental myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003, 108, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dewald, O.; Zymek, P.; Winkelmann, K.; Koerting, A.; Ren, G.; Abou-Khamis, T.; Michael, L.H.; Rollins, B.J.; Entman, M.L.; Frangogiannis, N.G. CCL2/Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulates inflammatory responses critical to healing myocardial infarcts. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Martinovic, I.; Abegunewardene, N.; Seul, M.; Vosseler, M.; Horstick, G.; Buerke, M.; Darius, H.; Lindemann, S. Elevated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 serum levels in patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Circ. J. 2005, 69, 1484–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Inoue, S.; Egashira, K.; Ni, W.; Kitamoto, S.; Usui, M.; Otani, K.; Ishibashi, M.; Hiasa, K.; Nishida, K.; Takeshita, A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy limits progression and destabilization of established atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Circulation 2002, 106, 2700–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Little, P.J.; Ivey, M.E.; Osman, N. Endothelin-1 actions on vascular smooth muscle cell functions as a target for the prevention of atherosclerosis. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2008, 6, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Winkles, J.A.; Alberts, G.F.; Brogi, E.; Libby, P. Endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor mRNA expression in normal and atherosclerotic human arteries. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 191, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cherng, J.-Y.; Shih, M.-F. Preventing dyslipidemia by Chlorella pyrenoidosa in rats and hamsters after chronic high fat diet treatment. Life Sci. 2005, 76, 3001–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sano, T.; Tanaka, Y. Effects of dried powdered Chlorella vulgaris on experimental atherosclerosis and alimentary hypercholesterolemia in cholesterol-fed rabbit. Artery 1987, 14, 76–84. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cherng, J.Y.; Liu, C.C.; Shen, C.R.; Lin, H.H.; Shih, M.-F. Beneficial effects of Chlorella-11 peptide on blocking the LPS-induced macrophage activation and alleviating the thermal injury induced inflammation in rats. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2010, 24, 817–826. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sheih, I.C.; Fang, T.J.; Wu, T.K.; Lin, P.H. Anticancer and antioxidant activities of the peptide fraction from algae protein waste. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 1202–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ross, R. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am. Heart. J. 1999, 138, S419–S420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rus, H.G.; Vlaicu, R.; Niculescu, F. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 protein and gene expression in human arterial atherosclerotic wall. Atherosclerosis 1996, 127, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Harama, D.; Koyama, K.; Mukai, M.; Shimokawa, N.; Miyata, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Ohnuma, Y.; Ogawa, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Paton, A.W.; et al. A subcytotoxic dose of subtilase cytotoxin prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses, depending on its capacity to induce the unfolded protein response. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krieglstein, C.F.; Granger, D.N. Adhesion molecules and their role in vascular disease. Am. J. Hypertens. 2001, 14, S44–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Granger, D.N.; Vowinkel, T.; Petnehazy, T. Modulation of the inflammatory response in cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 2004, 43, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Amberger, A.; Hala, M.; Saurwein-Teissl, M.; Metzler, B.; Grubeck-Loebenstein, B.; Xu, Q.; Wick, G. Suppressive effects of anti-inflammatory agents on human endothelial cell activation and induction of heat shock proteins. Mol. Med. 1999, 5, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fotis, L.; Giannakopoulos, D.; Stamogiannou, L.; Xatzipsalti, M. Intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in children. Do they play a role in the progression of atherosclerosis? Hormones (Athens) 2012, 11, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
  28. Poston, R.N.; Johnson-Tidey, R.R. Localized adhesion of monocytes to human atherosclerotic plaques demonstrated in vitro: Implications for atherogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 149, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ghersa, P.; Hooft van Huijs duijnen, R.; Whelan, J.; Cambet, Y.; Pescini, R.; DeLamarter, J.F. Inhibition of E-selectin gene transcription through a cAMP-dependent protein kinase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 29129–29137. [Google Scholar]
  30. Balyasnikova, I.V.; Pelligrino, D.A.; Greenwood, J.; Adamson, P.; Dragon, S.; Raza, H.; Galea, E. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate regulates the expression of the intercellular adhesion molecule and the inducible nitric oxide synthase in brain endothelial cells. J. Cereb. Blood. Flow. Metab. 2000, 20, 688–699. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ono, H.; Ichiki, T.; Ohtsubo, H.; Fukuyama, K.; Imayama, I.; Iino, N.; Masuda, S.; Hashiguchi, Y.; Takeshita, A.; Sunagawa, K. cAMP-Response element-binding protein mediates tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells. Hypertens. Res. 2006, 29, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goueli, S.A.; Ahmed, K. Indomethacin and inhibition of protein kinase reactions. Nature 1980, 287, 171–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Babaei, S.; Picard, P.; Ravandi, A.; Monge, J.C.; Lee, T.C.; Cernacek, P.; Stewart, D.J. Blockade of endothelin receptors markedly reduces atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice: Role of endothelin in macrophage foam cell formation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2000, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dejana, E.; Orsenigo, F.; Lampugnani, M.G. The role of adherens junctions and VE-cadherin in the control of vascular permeability. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mehta, D.; Malik, A.B. Signaling mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 279–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, C.; Wu, M.H.; Yuan, S.Y. Nonmuscle myosin light-chain kinase deficiency attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice via reduced endothelial barrier dysfunction and monocyte migration. Circulation 2011, 124, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. O’Connell, K.A.; Edidin, M. A mouse lymphoid endothelial cell line immortalized by simian virus 40 binds lymphocytes and retains functional. J. Immunol. 1990, 144, 521–525. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bian, C.; Wu, Y.; Chen, P. Telmisartan increases the permeability of endothelial cells through zonula occludens-1. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Supplementary Files

  • Supplementary File 1:

    Supplementary Materials (PDF, 27 KB)

  • Share and Cite

    MDPI and ACS Style

    Shih, M.F.; Chen, L.C.; Cherng, J.Y. Chlorella 11-Peptide Inhibits the Production of Macrophage-Induced Adhesion Molecules and Reduces Endothelin-1 Expression and Endothelial Permeability. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 3861-3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11103861

    AMA Style

    Shih MF, Chen LC, Cherng JY. Chlorella 11-Peptide Inhibits the Production of Macrophage-Induced Adhesion Molecules and Reduces Endothelin-1 Expression and Endothelial Permeability. Marine Drugs. 2013; 11(10):3861-3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11103861

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Shih, Mei Fen, Lih Chi Chen, and Jong Yuh Cherng. 2013. "Chlorella 11-Peptide Inhibits the Production of Macrophage-Induced Adhesion Molecules and Reduces Endothelin-1 Expression and Endothelial Permeability" Marine Drugs 11, no. 10: 3861-3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11103861

    Article Metrics

    Back to TopTop