Next Article in Journal
Anti-Parasitic Compounds from Streptomyces sp. Strains Isolated from Mediterranean Sponges
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Natural Meroterpenes: Synthesis and Antiproliferative Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/md8020359
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Lobane and Cembrane Diterpenes from Two Comorian Soft Corals

by
Isabelle Bonnard
1,*,
Sabina B. Jhaumeer-Laulloo
2,
Nataly Bontemps
1,
Bernard Banaigs
1 and
Maurice Aknin
3
1
Laboratoire de Chimie des Biomolécules et de l'Environnement, Centre de Phytopharmacie, Université de Perpignan, 52 avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius
3
Laboratoire de Chimie des Substances Naturelles et des Sciences des Aliments, 15, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, Université de La Réunion, avenue René Cassin-BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis, Messag., Cedex 9, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2010, 8(2), 359-372; https://doi.org/10.3390/md8020359
Submission received: 25 January 2010 / Revised: 8 February 2010 / Accepted: 20 February 2010 / Published: 23 February 2010
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preliminary biological investigation of a collection of Comorian soft corals resulted in the selection of two specimens, one of Sarcophyton and the other of Lobophytum, on the basis of their toxicity on larvae of the brine shrimp (Artemia salina) and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, respectively. Bioassay-guided fractionations provided a known antitumor promoter cembrane diterpenoid, (+)-sarcophytol-A (1), along with a new lobane diterpenoid, carbomethoxyfuscol (2), from Sarcophyton sp., and a new cembranoid, crassumolide E (3), from Lobophytum sp. The structures of compounds 1–3 were determined by spectroscopic analysis and by comparison of the spectral data with previously reported values. The cembranoid 3 was found to exhibit a moderate inhibitory effect on acetylcholinesterase.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alcyonarians are rich sources of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes with unique structural diversity and pronounced biological activities [1]. Among these, lobane and cembrane diterpenoids are typical of coelenterates of the orders Alcyonacea and Gorgonacea, which have been recognized as the most prolific sources of these classes of diterpenes. Lobanes, which have been isolated from the Gorgonian species Eunicea fusca [2] and from soft corals of the genera Lobophytum [3–6] and Sinularia [7–9], are known for their antibacterial, fungicidal and cytotoxic properties. Cembranes, found in several genera of soft corals, in particular Lobophytum [10], Sinularia [11] and Sarcophyton [12], are believed to play a role in the protection of soft corals from predators [13]. They have been reported to have antitumor, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, calcium antagonistic effects and neuroprotective activities.
In our search for bioactive substances from marine organisms, a biological screen of a collection of Comorian soft corals was initiated on toxic activity using brine shrimp Artemia salina assay [14] and on acetylcholinesterase inhibition using a TLC assay [15]. These two biological assays were chosen specifically because they are simple and rapid. The TLC bioassay gives quick access to the activity and its localization in complex matrices. The latter was also chosen because of the implication of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors in the therapeutic approach to the fight against Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system that is characterized by an alteration of the cholinergic system and other neurotransmitter systems. One of the current therapeutic approaches to treating AD is aimed at restoring the native levels of acetylcholine in the central nervous system by using AChE inhibitors. Based on this strategy, AChE inhibitors are the most widely developed class of drugs approved for the symptomatic treatment of the disease. These include synthetic donepezil (Aticept®), rivastigmine (Exelon®) and the naturally occurring alkaloid galanthamine (Razadyne®) [16,17]. Some AChE inhibitors are known to have short half-time or strong side-effects. Even treatments with galanthamine, which is a potent long-acting drug with low toxicity, have shown a decline in clinical efficacy with time. The need for new potent selective and low side-effects AChE inhibitors is still enormous. After exploration of the terrestrial domain, marine organisms are being investigated.
Two specimens of soft corals were selected for their significant bioactivity against larvae of Artemia salina and acetylcholinesterase. Bioassays-guided separation resulted in the isolation of a known antitumor cembrane, (+)-sarcophytol-A (1), along with a new lobane, carbomethoxyfuscol (2) from a Sarcophyton sp. (family Alcyoniidae), and the isolation of a new cembranoid, crassumolide E (3), inhibitor of the acetylcholinesterase, from a Lobophytum sp. (family Alcyoniidae) (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

Specimens of the soft corals Lobophytum sp. and Sarcophyton sp. were collected by scuba diving at the lagoon of Southern Mayotte, Comoros Island, northwest of Madagascar. All specimens were treated following the same procedure: the freeze-dried biological material was extracted with a mixture of methanol–dichloromethane 1:1 to give a crude extract. The latter was partitioned between ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and water, and the organic phase was subjected to a silica gel column eluted sequentially with hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and methanol. The EtOAc fractions of both soft corals were selected on the basis of their bioactivity, i.e., the Sarcophyton EtOAc fraction showed toxicity against larvae of Artemia salina, and the Lobophytum EtOAc extract inhibited acetylcholinesterase. Fractions exhibiting activities were further chromatographied on silica gel column using different pentane–EtOAc mixtures. Final purifications were achieved by normal-phase HPLC to afford diterpenes 1–2 from Sarcophyton and 3 from Lobophytum.

2.1. Sarcophyton

Compound 1 was identified as (+)-sarcophytol-A by comparison of its spectral data with previously reported values [18]. The toxic activity against Artemia salina was mainly provided by this compound. Sarcophytol A has been reported to show antitumor activity [19] as well as potent inhibitory activities against several kinds of tumor promoters [20].
Compound 2 was isolated as a white solid, [α]20 D +3.0° (c 0.86, CHCl3). Its molecular formula was established as C21H32O3 by HRESIMS analysis (m/z 355.2240 [M + Na]+, calculated for 355.2244). Its UV absorption (224 and 254 nm) indicated conjugation, and its IR spectrum revealed the presence of a hydroxyl group at 3400 cm−1 and an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group at 1690 cm−1 besides further unsaturations and a terminal vinyl group (1630, 1450 and 895 cm−1).
The 1H and 13C NMR data were consistent with a lobane derivative (Table 1). In particular, the 1H spectrum revealed the presence of vinyl and isoprenyl systems of a lobane skeleton. In addition, three olefinic protons were observed in the downfield region at δH 6.05 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-17), 6.33 (1H, d, J = 14.0 Hz, H-15), and 6.97 (1H, dd, J = 14.0 and 15.0 Hz, H-16), which suggested, according to COSY correlations between H-15/H-16 and H-16/H-17, the presence of a conjugated diene system. The large coupling constants (14.0 and 15.0 Hz) between H-15/H-16 and H-16/H-17 indicated the 13(Z),16(E) configuration of the diene system. The occurrence of two overlapping methyl signals at δH 1.36 (6H, s, H-19 and H-20) connected to one oxygenated carbon (δC 71.0, C-18) suggested that a hydroxyl group is located at C-18. Confirmation of this site was achieved by an HMBC experiment that unambiguously established the atom connectivities in 2 (Figure 2), i.e., long-range correlations were found between the olefinic proton at δH 6.05 (H-17) and the quaternary carbon at δC 71.0 (C-18), and the methyl carbons at δC 29.6 (C-19 and C-20). Besides, long-range correlations were found between the methyl protons at δH 1.36 and C-17 and C-18. The sp2 quaternary carbon C-13 could be connected to a carbomethoxy group (δC 167.8, C-14; 51.6, C-21; δH 3.79, 3H, s, H-21) according to long-range correlation from H-15 to C-14. And a long-range correlation from H-15 to C-4 indicated that this quaternary carbon C-13 could be linked to the cyclic moiety. The presence of a carbomethoxy moiety was confirmed by the presence of the fragment ions at m/z 273 [M–COOCH3]+ and m/z 255 [M–COOCH3–H2O]+ in the mass spectrum. The conjugation of the diene with the ester function explained the significant differences in the chemical shifts of C-13, C-15, C-16 and C-17, as well as H-15, H-16 and H-17, compared to the 1H and 13C NMR data of fuscol (4), a lobane congener isolated from the gorgonian species Eunicea fusca [21] and from the soft coral Lobophytum microlobulatum [22], which present a methyl group instead of the carboxylate function.
The relative configuration of the various assymetric centers was deduced from the comparison with NMR data of diverse lobane congeners (the lobanes have all been described with the same stereochemistry as 1R, 2R, 4S); the similarity in the 13C chemical shifts of C-1 to C-12 in all compounds indicated the same relative configuration of the cyclohexane system. Thus, 2 was deduced to be methyl (1R*, 2R*, 4S*)-18-hydroxyloba-8, 10, 13(Z), 16(E)-tetraen-13-carboxylate.
Only one other publication mentions the coexistence of lobane and cembrane diterpenoids in a soft coral: fuscol and isofuscol were isolated with 11, 12-epoxycembra-1, 3, 7-triene, decaryol and 3, 4-epoxycembra-7, 11-dien-15-ol from Lobophytum microlobulatum [22]. The co-occurrence of lobane with sesquiterpenes (Δ9(15)-africanene [5, 23], 15-nor-13-keto-β-elemene [5, 21, 24]) or with steroids [5, 6, 21, 25, 26] has also been reported. Until now, lobanes have been exclusively isolated from the Gorgonian species Eunicea fusca [2] and from the soft corals of the genera Lobophytum [3–6] and Sinularia [7–9, 27]. It is the first time that a lobane derivative has been isolated from the Sarcophyton genus.

2.2. Lobophytum

Compound 3 was isolated as a white solid, [α]20D +4.2° (c 2.12, MeOH). HRESIMS established the molecular formula as C20H26O4 (m/z 353.1727 [M+Na]+, calculated for 353.1724). The IR spectrum supported the presence of a γ-butyrolactone moiety (ν 1766 cm−1), and an α, β-unsatured carboxyl group (ν3500–2700 and 1683 cm−1), which was corroborated by an UV absorption maximum at 231 nm. 1H and 13C spectral data (Table 2) showed that 3 contained an α-methylene-γ-lactone [δH 2.97 (1H, ddd, J = 2.3, 4.3, 11.2 Hz, H-1), 4.11 (1H, ddd, J = 2.3, 5.1, 9.6 Hz, H-14), 5.67 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-17a), 6.29 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-17b) in the 1H NMR spectrum and δC 43.7 (d, C-1), 80.8 (d, C-14), 138.7 (s, C-15), 170.3 (s, C-16), 123.2 (t, C-17) in the 13C NMR spectrum], two methyl-bearing trisubstituted double bonds [δH 1.53 (3H, s, H-18), 4.84 (1H, dd, J = 4.0, 10.0 Hz, H-3), 1.58 (3H, s, H-19), 4.95 (1H, dd, J = 7.0, 8.0 Hz, H-7), and δC 15.5 (q, C-18), 122.0 (d, C-3), 137.6 (s, C-4), 17.0 (q, C-19), 124.0 (d, C-7), 133.9 (s, C-8)], and a conjugated olefinic system [δH 7.03 (1H, dd, J = 4.0, 9.0 Hz, H-11), δC 151.5 (d, C-11), 125.5 (s, C-12)]. The 13C NMR spectrum also disclosed six methylene carbons [δC 33.6, 39.1, 24.1, 37.5, 27.6, 31.7] and a carboxylic carbon at δC 172.4. The presence of a carboxylic acid was supported by the appearance of an additional signal at δH 12.3, characteristic of a carboxylic proton, in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 recorded in DMSO-d6. Moreover, the presence of a conjugated carboxylic acid explained the low-field signal of H-11 at δH 7.03 assignable to the β-proton on the α, β-unsaturated carboxyl group.
After assignment of each direct C-H bonding based on HSQC data, the partial structures a, b, and c (Figure 3) were established by 1H-1H COSY analysis and supported by long-range HMBC correlations. The partial structures were reasonably connected to each other following HMBC correlations (Figure 4). The link between segments a and b via C-4 and C-5 was deduced from longrange correlations between H-5 to C-18. The connection between b and c via C-8 and C-10 was revealed by correlations between H-7, H-19, H-10a and H-10b to C-9. Finally, the connection between c and a via C-12 and C-13 was determined by correlations between H-13a and H-13b to C-11, C-12, C-20.
The E-configuration of the two methyl-substituted olefins was deduced from the 13C NMR data [δC 15.5 (q, C-18), 17.0 (q, C-19)] [28]. The E-configuration of the carboxylic-substituted olefin was suggested by the large downfield shifts of the vinylic proton (H-11) and carbon C-11 [δH 7.03 (H-11) and δC 151.5 (C-11)] [29]. In order to deduce the stereochemistry of the lactone ring junction, NOESY experiments have been recorded in different solvent conditions but no dipolar coupling could be observed between H-1 and H-14. According to literature [30–33], the coupling constant between the lactone methine protons (3J1,14) did not permit univocal stereochemical assignments due to the flexibility of the cembrane ring. However, previous studies tended to show that small coupling constants (ranging from 2.9 to 7.5 Hz) indicate a trans-fused γ-lactone ring while large coupling constants (from 6.5 to 9.3 Hz) suggest a cis-fused γ-lactone ring [33–36]. These propositions were done in agreement with several X-ray studies [29, 33, 37]. The 3J1,14 coupling constant of the lactone methine protons for 3 being 2.3 Hz, this suggests a trans-fused γ-lactone as in crassumolide A (5) [38], a cembrane isolated from Lobophytum crassum, whose structure is very similar. Thus, 3 was proposed as (1R*,14S*)-cembra-3(E),7(E),11(Z),15(17)-tetraen-14, 16-olide-12-carboxylic acid.
Although cembranes are the most commonly encountered class of secondary metabolites from Lobophytum soft corals, this new compound possesses an original functionality: an α, β-unsatured carboxyl group. This functionality is only present in four other marine cembranes: lobohedleolide and 7Z-lobohedleolide (isolated from Lobophytum hedleyi [27] and from Lobophytum crassum [34]), 2-epi-11Z-lobohedleolide (Lobophytum sp. [39]), and 17-dimethylaminolobohedleolide (Lobophytum sp. [10]). Its position in the cembane ring on C12 is unprecedented and the geometry of the C-11/C-12 double bond is unusual.
Moreover, this compound was found to exhibit inhibitory effects on AChE. A TLC bioautographic method for detection of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors was used for the screening of soft coral extracts. The active fraction of Lobophytum sp. was directly detected on the TLC. After purification on HPLC, the active fraction afforded compound 3, that was further tested in order to establish the detection limit for its activity (Figure 5). 3 showed weak activity (1 μg at least) as AChE inhibitor, compared to galanthamine, an alkaloid isolated from plants of the Amaryllidaceae family (the smallest amount required 0.01 μg, cf. lit. [15]).
Only few AChE inhibitors have been isolated from marine organisms. One other terpene from the Alcyonacea family has been found to exhibit a modest AChE inhibition activity: cladidiol isolated from a Cladiella species [40]. Other examples are: a series of natural pigments with tetrazacyclopentazulene skeleton found in the zoanthid coral Parazoanthus axinellae (pseudozoanthoxanthins and zoanthoxanthins) [41], an irreversible inhibitor from the mollusk Onchidella binneyi (onchial) [42], a lipoidal metabolite isolated from the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium breve (BTX-B) [43], a nemertine alkaloid toxin (anabaseine) [44], a large 3-alkylpyridinium polymer isolated from the sponge Reniera sarai (poly-APS) [45, 46], a bromotyrosine-derived metabolite of an unidentified verongid sponge (aplysamine-4) [47] and spirocompounds isolated from the mediterranean sponge Aplysina cavernicola (aerothionin, homoaerothionin, 11, 19-dideoxyfistularin) [48], a diiodotyramine derivative from the Japanese gastropod Turbo marmorata (turbotoxin A) [49] and a pyridoacridine alkaloid from a Thai marine sponge Petrosia n. sp. (petrosamine) [50].
The biological interest of the newly isolated cembrane lies not only in its inhibitory effect on AChE, but also in the possibility of using this compound as a tool in the regulation of acetylcholine receptors. Over recent years, new results have emerged demonstrating that AChE inhibitors have additional pharmacological properties, i.e., protection against neurotoxic agents, such as glutamate, and up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Neuroprotection against toxic insults and use of nAChR modulators appears to be a promising new strategy against neurodegenerative diseases. Several tobacco and marine cembranoids have been found to interact with nAChRs in complex ways: as irreversible inhibitors at the agonist sites, as non competitive inhibitors, or as positive modulators. Studies of neuroprotection by a tobacco cembranoid and by the marine cembranoid sarcophytolide, isolated from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum, revealed apparent similarities between the two compounds, and allowed one to conclude that neuroprotection is based on a nicotinic mechanism [51]. It remains to be determined whether the AChR-mediated neuroprotection by those two cembranoids is the exception or a general property of most cembranoids. The isolation of new marine cembranoids with acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effects will give the opportunity to explore the specific action of cembranoids on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

TLC were performed on pre-coated TLC plates with Sigel 60 F 254 (Marchey–Nagel, Düren, Germany). HPLC was conducted with a MerckLiChrospher Si 60 (250 × 4 mm, 5 μm) column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), using different cyclohexane–EtOAc mixtures as eluent, and a refractometric detection. Optical rotations were measured at 20 °C on a Jasco P-1010 polarimeter. Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded in methanol on a Perkin Elmer 551 spectrometer and Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained in chloroform on a Perkin Elmer 1600 FTIR spectrometer. 1H and 13C spectra, and 2D-NMR experiments were recorded on Brücker Avance DPX-250 NMR and Jeol EX 400 NMR spectrometers. Chemical shifts are given on a δ (ppm) scale with CHCl3 (1H, 7.26 ppm; 13C, 77.0 ppm) as internal standard. EI and HRESI mass spectra were acquired on an ATI UNICAM and a micromass LCT (ES) mass spectrometer, respectively.

3.2. Biological Material

Specimens of the soft corals Lobophytum sp. and Sarcophyton sp. were collected at the lagoon of Southern Mayotte, Comoros Islands, northwest of Madagascar, by scuba diving at a depth of 10 meters. Samples were identified by G. Williams (California Academy of Sciences). A positive identification could not be done, but the Lobophytum specimen showed similarities to Lobophytum crassum (Marenzeller, 1886), and the Sarcophyton specimen appeared close to Sarcophyton infundibuliforme (Tixier-Durivault, 1956). Voucher fragments are maintained at the California Academy of Sciences.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The freeze-dried samples of Lobophytum (780 g) and Sarcophyton (630 g) were extracted with CH2Cl2–MeOH 1:1 (500 mL × 4). The total extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure and partitioned between EtOAc and H2O. The organic fractions were taken to dryness (to provide 12.8 g for Lobophytum and 5.4 g for Sarcophyton) and subjected to chromatography on a methanol-desactivated silica gel column with hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and methanol. The EtOAc fractions of both soft corals were selected on the basis of their bioactivity, i.e., the Sarcophyton EtOAc fraction showed toxicity against larvae of Artemia salina (at a concentration of 100 μg. mL−1), and the Lobophytum fraction inhibited acetylcholinesterase (at 100 μg. mL−1). Fractions exhibiting activities were further subjected to silica gel column (63–200 μm) eluted with different pentane–EtOAc mixtures. The Sarcophyton fraction, eluted with pentane–EtOAc 90:10 and active on Artemia salina, was purified by normal-phase HPLC using cyclohexane–EtOAc 95:5 as eluent, to afford 5.3 mg of 1. The Sarcophyton fraction, eluted with pentane–EtOAc 70:30, was purified on silica-gel column (40–63 μm) with isochratic elution (pentane–EtOAc 80:20) then by HPLC (cyclohexane–EtOAc 95:5 as eluent), to obtain 5.0 mg of 2. The Lobophytum fraction, eluted with pentane–EtOAc 60:40 and active on acetylcholinesterase, was purified by HPLC (cyclohexane–EtOAc 70:30 as eluent), to afford 240.0 mg of 3.
(+)-Sarcophytol-A (1) was obtained as a colorless oil: [α]20D +122.0° (c 0.38, CHCl3) (lit. +141.0°); 1H and 13C NMR data were in agreement with previously reported values [18].
Methyl (1R*,2R*,4S*)-18-hydroxyloba-8, 10, 13(E),16(E)-tetraen-13-carboxylate (2) was obtained as a white amorphous powder: [α]20D +3.0° (c 0.85, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ɛ) 224 (3.24), 254 (3.14); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3400 br, 1690, 1630, 1450, 895 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table 1; EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 289 (4.3), 273 [M–COOCH3]+ (16.0), 255 [M–COOCH3–H2O]+ (5.3), 197 (3.0), 173 (5.3), 161 (13.8), 147 (26.4), 135 (45.0), 121 (100.0), 109 (85.6), 95 (78.8), 91 (71.3); HRESIMS m/z 355.2240 [M+Na]+ (calculated for C21H32O3Na, 355.2244).
(1R*,14S*)-cembra-3(E),7(E),11(E),15(17)-tetraen-14, 16-olide-12-carboxylic acid (3) was obtained as a white amorphous powder: [α]20D +4.2° (c 2.12, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ɛ) 230 (3.12); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3500–2700, 1766, 1683 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table 2; EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 312 [M–OH]+ (1.3), 285 [M–COO]+ (7.9), 256 (3.6), 239 (11.0), 149 (18.7), 141 (27.0), 135 (65.0), 121 (59.0), 107 (100.0), 95 (47.6), 91 (52.0); HRESIMS m/z 353.1727 [M+Na]+ (calculated for C20H26O4Na, 353.1724).

3.4. Brine Shrimp Lethality Test

Eggs of Artemia salina (Dohse, Aquaristik GmbH, Bonn, Germany) were hatched in a small tank filled with natural sea water at 25 °C under continuous light regime. After 48 h, the phototropic nauplii were collected; 10 shrimps were transferred to each sample vial using a pipette, and seawater was added to a final volume of 180 μL. 20 μL of each sample (solution of 1 mg. mL−1 in water and 10% EtOH) were added in the 96-well plate. The toxicity was determined after 24 and 48 h of exposure. The experiments were done twice in duplicate.

3.5. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Test

Acetylcholinesterase (Sigma, St Louis, USA; 1000 U) was dissolved in 150 mL of 0.05 M Tris-hydrochloric acid buffer at pH 7.8, with 150 mg of bovine serum albumin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). After deposition of the samples on TLC (100 μg) and migration in a suitable solvent, the TLC plate was dried to remove the solvent, sprayed with the enzyme solution and dried again. The plate was placed in an incubator at 90% humidity and 37 °C for 20 min. For detection of the enzyme, 10 mL of a 1-naphtylacetate solution (250 mg in 100 mL of ethanol) and 40 mL of a Fast Blue Salt solution (400 mg in 160 mL of distilled water) were mixed and sprayed onto the plate to give a purple coloration after 1–2 min. Inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase appear as white spots.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Gary Williams (Academy of Sciences of California) for identification of the soft corals. This project was supported by a grant of AUF (Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie) to S. B. Jhaumeer-Laulloo.
  • Samples Availability: Available from the authors.

References and Notes

  1. Blunt, JW; Copp, BR; Hu, W.-P; Munro, MHG; Northcote, PT; Princep, MR. Marine Natural products. Nat Prod Rep 2009, 26, 170–244, and earlier references in this series cited therein. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shin, J; Fenical, W. Fuscosides A-D: Antiinflammatory diterpenoid glycosides of new structural classes from the Caribbean gorgonian Eunicea fusca. J Org Chem 1991, 56, 3153–3158. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dunlop, RW; Wells, RJ. Isolation of some novel diterpenes from a soft coral of the genus Lobophytum. Aust J Chem 1979, 32, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar]
  4. Edrada, RA; Proksch, P; Wray, V; Witte, L; van Ofwegen, L. Four new bioactive lobane diterpenes of the soft coral Lobophytum pauciflorum from Mindoro, Philippines. J Nat Prod 1998, 61, 358–361. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anjaneyulu, ASR; Raju, KVS. A new lobane diterpene acid from the soft coral Lobophytum microlobulatum of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian J Chem 1996, 35B, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anjaneyulu, ASR; Kameswara Rao, NS. Four new lobane diterpenoids from the soft coral Lobophytum microlobulatum of the Havellock island of the Andaman and Nicobar group of Islands. Indian J Chem 1996, 35B, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamada, T; Kusumi, T; Ishitsuka, MO; Kakisawa, H. Structures and absolute configurations of the new lobane diterpenoids from the Okinawan soft coral Sinularia flexibilis. Chem Lett 1992, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kusumi, T; Hamada, T; Ishitsuka, MO; Ohtani, I; Kakisawa, H. Elucidation of the relative and absolute stereochemistry of lobatriene, a marine diterpene, by a modified Mosher method. J Org Chem 1992, 57, 1033–1035. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chai, M.-C; Wang, S.-K; Dai, C.-F; Duh, C.-Y. A cytotoxic lobane diterpene from the Formosan soft coral Sinularia inelegans. J Nat Prod 2000, 63, 843–844. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rashid, MA; Gustafson, KR; Boyd, MR. HIV-inhibitory cembrane derivatives from a Philippines collection of the soft coral Lobophytum species. J Nat Prod 2000, 63, 531–533. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahmed, AF; Shiue, R.-T; Wang, G.-H; Dai, C.-F; Kuo, Y.-H; Sheu, J.-H. Five novel norcembranoids from Sinularia leptoclados and S parva. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7337–7344. [Google Scholar]
  12. Anjaneyulu, ASR; Venkateswara Rao, GJ. Chemical Constituents of the Soft Coral Species of Sarcophyton Genus: A Review. J Indian Chem Soc 1997, 74, 272–278. [Google Scholar]
  13. Coll, JC. The chemistry and the chemical ecology of octocorals (Coelenterata, Anthozoa, Octocorallia). Chem Rev 1992, 92, 613–631. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer, BN; Ferrigni, NR; Putnam, JE. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Medica 1982, 45, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  15. Marston, A; Kissling, J; Hostettmann, K. A rapid TLC bioautographic method for the detection of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors in plants. Phytochem Anal 2002, 13, 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  16. Blennow, K; de Leon, MJ; Zetterberg, H. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2006, 368, 387–403. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shah, RS; Lee, HG; Xiongwei, Z; Perry, G; Smith, MA; Castellani, RJ. Current approaches in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2008, 62, 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kobayashi, M; Nakagawa, T; Mitsuhashi, H. Marine terpene and terpenoids. I. Structures of four cembrane-type diterpenes; sarcophytol-A, sarcophytol-A acetate, sarcophytol-B, and sarcophytonin-A, from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum. Chem Pharm Bull 1979, 27, 2382–2387. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yokomatsu, H; Satake, K; Hiura, A; Tsutsumi, M; Suganuma, M. Sarcophytol A: A new chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agent for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 1994, 9, 526–530. [Google Scholar]
  20. Suganuma, M; Okabe, S; Sueoka, E; Iida, N; Komori, A; Kim, S-J; Fujiki, H. A new process of cancer prevention mediated through inhibition of tumor necrosis factor a expression. Cancer Res 1996, 56, 3711–3715. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gopichand, Y; Schmitz, FJ. Marine natural products: Fuscol, a new elemene-type diterpene alcohol from the gorgonian Eunicea fusca. Tetrahedron Lett 1978, 19, 3641–3644. [Google Scholar]
  22. Coll, JC; Bowden, BF; König, GM; Braslau, R; Price, IR. Studies of Australian soft corals. XXXX. The natural products chemistry of Alcyonacean soft corals with special reference to the genus Lobophytum. Bull Soc Chim Belg 1986, 95, 815–834. [Google Scholar]
  23. Anjaneyulu, ASR; Venkateswara Rao, G; Raju, KVS; Krishna Murthy, MVR. Two new lobane derivatives from the soft coral Lobophytum pauciflorum of the Havelock Island of the Indian Ocean. Indian J Chem 1995, 34B, 1074–1079. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakshmana Raju, B; Subbaraju, GV; Bheemasankara Rao, C; Trimurtulu, G. Two new oxygenated lobanes from a soft coral of Lobophytum species of the Andaman and Nicobar coasts. J Nat Prod 1993, 56, 961–966. [Google Scholar]
  25. Anjaneyulu, V; Nageswara Rao, K; Appa Rao, KMC. Isolation of loba-8,10,15-triene-13,17,18- triol-17,18-diacetate from a soft coral of Lobophytum species of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian J Chem 1995, 34B, 1071–1073. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakshmana Raju, B; Subbaraju, GV; Vasavi Reddy, K; Bheemasankara Rao, C. Alcyonacean metabolites : part 5. Further metabolites from a soft coral of Lobophytum genus of the Andaman and Nicobar coasts. Indian J Chem 1994, 33B, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar]
  27. A lobane has been reported isolated from Sclerophytum sp. but the coral was subsequently reidentified as part of a variable Lobophytum pauciflorum complex (cf. reference 23).
  28. Stothers, JB. Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1972; Volume Chapter 11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Uchio, Y; Toyota, J; Nozaki, H; Nakayama, M; Nishizono, Y; Hase, T. Lobohedleolide and (7Z)-lobohedleolide, new cembranolides from the soft coral Lobophytum hedleyi Whitelegge. Tetrahedron Lett 1981, 22, 4089–4092. [Google Scholar]
  30. Coll, JC; Mitchell, SJ; Stokie, GJ. Studies of Australian soft corals. II. A novel cembranoid diterpene from Lobophytum michaelae. Aust J Chem 1977, 30, 1859–1863. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bowden, BF; Brittle, JA; Coll, JC; Liyanage, N; Mitchell, SJ; Stokie, GJ. Studies of Australian soft corals. VI. A new cembranolide diterpene from the soft coral Lobophytum crassum. Tetrahedron Lett 1977, 41, 3661–3662. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahond, A; Bowden, BF; Coll, JC; Fourneron, J-D; Mitchell, SJ. Studies of Australian soft corals. XII. Further cembranolide diterpenes from Lobophytum crassospiculatum and a correction of a previous stereochemical assignment. Aust J Chem 1979, 32, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, W; Krohn, K; Ding, J; Miao, Z.-H; Zhou, X.-H; Chen, S.-H; Pescitelli, G; Salvadori, P; Kurtan, T; Guo, Y.-W. Structural and stereochemical studies of a α-methylene-γ-lactonebearing cembrane diterpenoids from a south China Sea soft coral Lobophytum crassum. J Nat Prod 2008, 71, 961–966. [Google Scholar]
  34. Duh, C.-Y; Wang, S.-K; Huang, B.-K; Dai, C.-F. Cytotoxic cembrenolide diterpenes from the Formosan soft coral Lobophytum crassum. J Nat Prod 2000, 63, 884–885. [Google Scholar]
  35. Duh, C.-Y; Wang, S.-K; Chung, S.-G; Chou, G.-C; Dai, C.-F. Cytotoxic cembrenolides and steroids from the Formosan soft coral Sarcophyton crassaule. J Nat Prod 2000, 63, 1634–1637. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kinamoni, Z; Grosweiss, A; Carmely, S; Kashman, Y; Loya, Y. Several new cembranoid diterpenes from three soft corals of the Red Sea. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 1643–1648. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, S.-K; Duh, C.-Y; Wu, Y.-C; Wang, Y; Cheng, M.-C; Soong, K; Fang, L.-S. Studies on Formosan soft corals, II. Cytotoxic cembranolides from the soft coral Lobophytum michaelae. J Nat Prod 1992, 55, 1430–1435. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chao, C.-H; Wen, Z.-H; Wu, Y.-C; Yeh, H.-C; Sheu, J.-H. Cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory cembranoids from the soft coral Lobophytum crassum. J Nat Prod 2008, 71, 1819–1824. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bheemasankara Rao, C; Ramanan, KV; Kalidindi Raju, SHSN; Sreenivasa Rao, D; Venkata Rao, D; Trimurtulu, G; Faulkner, DJ. Cembrane diterpenes from a new species of the genus Lobophytum of the Indian Ocean. Indian J Chem 1994, 33B, 1004–1005. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ata, A; Ackerman, J; Bayoud, A; Radhika, P. Bioactive Chemical Constituents of Cladiella Species. Helv Chim Acta 2004, 87, 592–597. [Google Scholar]
  41. Turk, T; Macek, P; Suput, D. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by a pseudozoanthoxanthin-like compound isolated from the zoanthid Parazoanthus axinellae (O. Schmidt). Toxicon 1995, 33, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  42. Abramson, SN; Radic, Z; Manker, D; Faulkner, DJ; Taylor, P. Onchidal: A naturally occurring irreversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase with a novel mechanism of action. Mol Pharmacol 1989, 36, 349–354. [Google Scholar]
  43. Husain, K; Singh, R; Kaushik, MP; Gupta, AK. Acute toxicity of synthetic Gymnodinium brevetoxin metabolite and its analogues in mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1996, 35, 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kem, WR. Alzheimer’s drug design based upon an invertebrate toxin (anabaseine) which is a potent nicotinic receptor agonist. Invert Neurosci 1997, 3, 251–259. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sepcic, K; Marcel, V; Klaebe, A; Turk, T; Suput, D; Fournier, D. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by an alkylpyridinium polymer from the marine sponge Reniera sarai. Biochemica Biophysica Acta 1998, 1387, 217–225. [Google Scholar]
  46. Turk, T; Frangez, R; Sepcic, K. Mechanisms of toxicity of 3-alkylpyridinium polymers from marine sponge Raniera sarai. Mar Drugs 2007, 5, 157–167. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sepcic, K; Mancini, I; Vidic, I; Jovan, U; Frassanito, R; Pietra, F; Macek, P; Turk, T. Antibacterial and anticholinesterase activities of aplysamine-4, a bromotyrosine-derived metabolite of a Red Sea marine sponge. J Nat Toxins 2001, 10, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  48. Martinez, GA; Alonso, GD; Dorronsoro, DI; Garcia, PE; Austria, LC; Usan, EP; Del, MMM; Median, PM. Marine compounds with calcium channel blocking properties for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. European Patent 2005, EP 1609783. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kigoshi, H; Kanematsu, K; Yokota, K; Uemura, D. Turbotoxins A and B, novel diiodotyramine derivatives from the Japanese gastropod Turbo marmorata. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9063–9070. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nukoolkarn, VS; Saen-oon, S; Rungrotmongkol, T; Hannongbua, S; Ingkaninan, K; Suwanborirux, K. Petrosamine, a potent anticholinesterase pyridoacridine alkaloid from a Thai marine sponge Petrosia n. sp. Bioorg Med Chem 2008, 16, 6560–6567. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ferchmin, PA; Pagan, OR; Ulrich, H; Szeto, AC; Hann, RM; Eterovic, VA. Actions of octocoral and tobacco cembranoids on nicotinic receptors. Toxicon 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marinedrugs 08 00359f1 1024
Figure 1. Structures of compounds 1–3, fuscol (4) and crassumolide A (5).
Figure 1. Structures of compounds 1–3, fuscol (4) and crassumolide A (5).
Marinedrugs 08 00359f1
Marinedrugs 08 00359f2 1024
Figure 2. Key HMBC correlations in 2.
Figure 2. Key HMBC correlations in 2.
Marinedrugs 08 00359f2
Marinedrugs 08 00359f3 1024
Figure 3. Partial structures for 3 based on 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC experiments.
Figure 3. Partial structures for 3 based on 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC experiments.
Marinedrugs 08 00359f3
Marinedrugs 08 00359f4 1024
Figure 4. Key HMBC correlations connecting the three fragments in 3.
Figure 4. Key HMBC correlations connecting the three fragments in 3.
Marinedrugs 08 00359f4
Marinedrugs 08 00359f5 1024
Figure 5. TLC plate showing the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by 3 (100–0.001 μg applied). The assay was carried out using a Sigel 60 F 254 plate that had been eluted with hexane–ethyl acetate (70:30).
Figure 5. TLC plate showing the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by 3 (100–0.001 μg applied). The assay was carried out using a Sigel 60 F 254 plate that had been eluted with hexane–ethyl acetate (70:30).
Marinedrugs 08 00359f5
Table
Table 1. 1H and 13C-NMR dataa of compound 2 in CDCl3
Table 1. 1H and 13C-NMR dataa of compound 2 in CDCl3
Atom n°1H NMR13C NMRcCOSYHMBC
139.8Cq
22,20 m52.7CH3
31,56 m33.4CH22, 4
42,02 m41.5CH3
51,60–1,57 mb27.2CH2
61,50–1,45 mb39.7CH2
71.08 s16.6CH38
85.82 dd (11.0, 18.0)150.0CH9a, 9b7
9a4.91 d (18.0)110.0CH281, 8
9b4.90 d (11.0)81, 8
10147.4Cq
11a4.82 br s112.3CH22, 12
11b4.58 br s2, 12
121.70 s24.8CH311a, 11b10, 11
13136.8Cq
14168.7Cq
156.33 d (14.0)134.3CH164, 14, 17
166.97 dd (14.0, 15.0)123.6CH15, 17
176.05 d (15.0)146.7CH1615, 18, 19/20
1871.0Cq
191.36 s29.6CH317, 18
201.36 s29.6CH317, 18
213.79 s51.6CH314
a1H NMR, 400 MHz; 13C NMR, 100 MHz; chemical shifts are given in δ values relative to CHCl3 as internal standard and coupling constants in Hz are in parentheses.
bThese protons appears as very broad multiplets in the proton spectrum. H2-5 and H2-6 data may be interchanged.
cCarbon atom multiplicity was deduced by DEPT.
Table
Table 2. 1H and 13C-NMR dataa of compound 3 in CDCl3
Table 2. 1H and 13C-NMR dataa of compound 3 in CDCl3
Atom n°1H NMR13C NMRbCOSYHMBC
12.97 ddd (2.3, 4.3, 11.2)43.7CH2a, 2b, 17a, 17b
2a2.18 m33.6CH21, 2b, 31
2b2.25 m1, 2a, 3
34.84 dd (4.0, 10.0)122.0CH2a, 2b, 1818
4137.6Cq
51.95 m39.1CH266, 18
62.15 m24.1CH25, 75
74.95 dd (7.0, 8.0)124.0CH6, 199, 19
8133.9Cq
92.22 m37.5CH2
10a2.30 m27.3CH2119
10b2.50 m119
117.03 dd (4.8, 9.0)151.5CH10a, 10b13, 20
12125.5Cq
13a2.57 m31.7CH213b, 141, 11, 12, 14, 20
13b2.68 m13a, 141, 11, 12, 14, 20
144.11 ddd (2.3, 5.1, 9.6)80.8CH2, 16
15138.7Cq
16170.3Cq
17a5.67 d (1.9)123.3CH21, 16
17b6.29 d (1.9)1, 15, 16
181.53 s15.5CH333, 4, 5
191.58 s17.0CH377, 8, 9
20172.4Cq
a1H NMR, 400 MHz; 13C NMR, 100 MHz; chemical shifts are given in δ values relative to CHCl3 as internal standard and coupling constants in Hz are in parentheses.
bCarbon atom multiplicity was deduced by DEPT.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bonnard, I.; Jhaumeer-Laulloo, S.B.; Bontemps, N.; Banaigs, B.; Aknin, M. New Lobane and Cembrane Diterpenes from Two Comorian Soft Corals. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 359-372. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8020359

AMA Style

Bonnard I, Jhaumeer-Laulloo SB, Bontemps N, Banaigs B, Aknin M. New Lobane and Cembrane Diterpenes from Two Comorian Soft Corals. Marine Drugs. 2010; 8(2):359-372. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8020359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bonnard, Isabelle, Sabina B. Jhaumeer-Laulloo, Nataly Bontemps, Bernard Banaigs, and Maurice Aknin. 2010. "New Lobane and Cembrane Diterpenes from Two Comorian Soft Corals" Marine Drugs 8, no. 2: 359-372. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8020359

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop