Next Article in Journal
Genomic Evidence for Bacterial Determinants Influencing Obesity Development
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Accumulation of Toxic and Essential Ultra-Trace Elements in Fruits of Sorbus domestica L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph14040344
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geographical Correlations between Indoor Radon Concentration and Risks of Lung Cancer, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, and Leukemia during 1999–2008 in Korea

by
Mina Ha
1,*,
Seung-sik Hwang
2,
Sungchan Kang
2,
No-Wook Park
3,
Byung-Uck Chang
4 and
Yongjae Kim
4
1
Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, Korea
2
Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
3
Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea
4
Department of Natural Radiation Safety, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 62 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34142, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(4), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040344
Submission received: 29 January 2017 / Revised: 19 March 2017 / Accepted: 22 March 2017 / Published: 24 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Indoor radon is the second most important risk factor for lung cancer and may also be a risk factor for hematopoietic cancers, particularly in children and adolescents. The present study measured indoor radon concentration nationwide at 5553 points during 1989–2009 and spatially interpolated using lognormal kriging. The incidences of lung cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), and leukemia, stratified by sex and five-year age groups in each of the 234 administrative regions in the country during 1999–2008, were obtained from the National Cancer Registry and used to calculate the standardized incidence ratios. After considering regional deprivation index values and smoking rates by sex in each region as confounding variables, the cancer risks were estimated based on Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We found that a 10 Bq/m3 increase in indoor radon concentration was associated with a 1% increase in the incidence of lung cancer in male and a 7% increase in NHL in female children and adolescents in Korea aged less than 20 years. Leukemia was not associated with indoor radon concentration. The increase in NHL risk among young women requires confirmation in future studies, and the radon control program should consider children and adolescents.

1. Introduction

Indoor radon is a major natural source of ionizing radiation exposure. Radon is a decay product of uranium, a naturally occurring element in granitic and metamorphic rocks [1]. Although humans can be exposed to radon via skin contact with radon or drinking water containing radon, the major exposure pathway is via the inhalation of radon gases in indoor air.
Kim et al. [2] first reported an annual arithmetic mean indoor radon level of 53 Bq/m3 in Korea, which is higher than the world average of 39 Bq/m3 and the highest level among East Asian countries [3]. About 8% of the surveyed households in Korea showed levels above the 300 Bq/m3 recommended by the International Commission for Radiation Protection. The average radon exposure was an estimated 1.65 mSv/year [4], which contributed to approximately 36% of the average annual ionizing exposure dose in the Korean population in 2007 [5]. Since 2011, the reported concentrations of measured indoor radon ranged from 102 to 124 Bq/m3 [6], suggesting the need for the implementation of effective residential radon control measures.
Radon is the second most important carcinogen for lung cancer and should be controlled to a level as low as reasonably achievable because of the lack of threshold [3]. Indoor radon exposure is associated with a 16% increase in lung cancer risk (95% confidence intervals: 5%–32%) per 100 Bq/m3 [7,8,9], and exposure may also be associated with an increased risk of cancers in children, particularly malignancies of the hematopoietic system [10]. Because the potential radon exposure pathways include respiration, ingestion, and skin contact, the potential effect includes cancers of the lung including the trachea and bronchus, brain tumors via the olfactory nerve route, and the gastrointestinal tract including oral cancers.
Although the Republic of Korea has reported indoor radon concentrations since 1989 [4], few studies have assessed its health effects in Korea [11]. Here, we examined the incidence and gender differences in malignant tumors—i.e., lung cancer, leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), in association with indoor radon exposure—using a geographical correlational method based on a Bayesian approach.
We selected lung cancer in order to replicate the effect size in Korea compared to those in previous studies of other countries. Lung cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Korea [12]. We also examined the incidences of leukemia and NHL. Leukemia is the most common cancer in children, which is one of the most susceptible populations for ionizing radiation. The incidence of NHL has been rapidly increasing worldwide in recent years, including Korea [13,14], but few environmental risk factors have been identified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Indoor Radon Concentration

We obtained data from a national radon survey conducted four times by the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety from 1989 to 2009, which performed a total of 5553 measurement points nationwide (Figure 1A). A detailed description has been reported elsewhere [4]. Table 1 presents a summary of the survey.
The annual average indoor radon concentrations were used as inputs for the geostatistical interpolation. Exploratory data analysis revealed that the indoor radon concentration data sets showed a highly positively skewed distribution with a skewness value of 7.84, which means that, while most of the data values were very low, extremely large values were observed in a small number of sampling sites. Therefore, lognormal kriging was used to reduce the effects of these extreme values during spatial interpolation [15]. Ordinary lognormal kriging was implemented at 1 km grid spacing using the Geostatistical Software Library (GSLIB) [16], and an unbiased back-transform [17] was performed in Fortran in order to estimate the original indoor radon concentrations (Figure 1B). The interpolated indoor radon concentrations were finally aggregated to county-level averages for each of the 234 administrative regions using ArcGIS (ArcMap version 10.0, ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA, USA) (Figure 1C).

2.2. Incidences of Lung Cancer, NHL, and Leukemia

We obtained the overall incidence rates of lung cancer (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, ICD-10 coded C33-C34) as well as the incidence rates of NHL (ICD-10 coded C82-C85, C96) and leukemia (ICD-10 coded C90-95) overall and in children and adolescents aged 19 years or less, stratified by sex and five-year age groups in each of the 234 administrative regions (Si/Gun/Gu: the second highest level of region) from 1999 to 2008 from the National Cancer Registry [18].
We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of cancers [19] by using the information on population count in 2009 from registered residents for each age group, sex, year, and administrative region as the denominator [20]. The age and sex standardized cancer incidence ratio in each administrative region was used for the correlation analysis with regional radon concentration.

2.3. Confounding Factors

We considered the regional deprivation index (DI) [21] as a potential confounding factor reflecting socioeconomic status on the relationship between radon exposure and lung cancers. The DI was developed based on the modified Carstairs deprivation score and the Townsend index [22]. The DI was constructed by scoring five factors—household overcrowdedness, male unemployment rate, head of the family in lower social class, home ownership, and substandard living resources—and z-standardizing the summed scores. The DI was calculated for all administrative regions using data from the 2005 National Census [20] and was used for analysis after quintile grouping.
Smoking rate by sex in each region was also considered as a confounding variable in the analysis. Information on the smoking rates in each region was obtained from the 2009 Community Health Survey [23], which is supplementary to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and whose purpose is to provide health indices at the community level. The unit of community is the same as the administrative region in the present study.

2.4. Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Radon Exposure and Cancers

The present study utilized a hierarchical Bayesian model to examine the relationship between indoor radon concentration and SIR for cancer [24]. This method utilizes the local and neighboring observations and partition variation in complex statistical models of spatiotemporal association into simpler components [24,25]. Here, the conditional autoregressive model, first proposed by Besag et al. [26], was applied to model the spatial dependency between radon concentration and cancer incidence, a method which has been widely used in disease mapping [24,25]. Because there was no historical information on covariates, non-informative priors with zero means and extremely large variances were used [25].
Using WinBUGS version 1.4.3 (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, and Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK) with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, we generated five parallel chains, each with 20,000 samples, removed the initial 5000 iterations as the burn-in period, and systematically sampled during each of the five iterations to reduce autocorrelation in the sample [27]. In addition, the convergence of the chain was assessed by the Gelman–Rubin statistic [28]. Finally, we estimated the coefficients and calculated the relative risk and its 95% credible intervals as the post probability distribution for each cancer.

3. Results

Table 2 presents the characteristics of the 234 community regions. The study regions showed an average population of 172,857 individuals (range: 10,325–1,073,149). The median aggregated indoor radon concentration was 57 Bq/m3 with a maximum of 231 Bq/m3. Approximately 5.3% of the mean values of the 5553 measurement points were above the 148 Bq/m3 level recommended by the Korean Ministry of Environment (Ministry of Environment, Act of Indoor Air Quality Control). The average smoking rates were 50.4% and 6.4% in men and women, respectively, in 2009. During the 10-year study period, there were 115,534 and 43,178 reported cases of lung cancers, 2843 and 2051 NHL, and 15,805 and 11,696 leukemia in men and women in Korea, respectively. Among children and adolescents less than 20 years of age, there were 2843 and 2051 NHL, and 1044 and 523 leukemia cases, respectively. The maximum SIRs for cancers ranged from 1.67 to 4.99.
In male subjects, the relative risk of lung cancer per 10 Bq/m3 increase was 1.01, a statistically significant difference; however, the risk of NHL did not increase. In contrast, the risk of lung cancer did not show a significant increase, while a 10 Bq/m3 increase in indoor radon significantly increased the risk of NHL in female subject by 4%, mainly due to the high risk in children and adolescents (relative risk: 1.07, 95% credible interval: 1.01, 1.13). However, the risk of leukemia was not associated with indoor radon concentration overall or in those subjects of both sexes less than 20 years of age (Table 3).

4. Discussion

We found that a 10 Bq/m3 increase in indoor radon concentration was associated with a 1% increase in lung cancer in male and a 7% increase in NHL in female children and adolescents less than 20 years of age. However, the incidence of leukemia was not significantly associated with indoor radon concentration in all or those less than 20 years of age in Korea.
Indoor radon exposure has been associated with increased lung cancer incidence and mortality. The findings of the present study are consistent with those of previous reports. While the 1% increase in lung cancer risk was observed in both male and female subjects in the present study, the difference was significant only in males. Because smoking has a modifying effect on the association between radon exposure and lung cancer [29], this gender difference may be explained in part by the gender differences in smoking rates (50.4% and 6.0% in males and females, respectively). While smoking does not seem to be an important confounding factor for the estimation of lung cancer risk from radon exposure [30], the synergistic effect of smoke and radon on lung cancer might influence the overall estimate of lung cancer risk.
Besides the lungs, radon can also deliver a dose of alpha radiation to the bone marrow, with further impacts on the hematopoietic and lymphatic systems [10].
The risk of leukemia has been weakly associated with indoor radon exposure in children and adolescents and these results remain controversial; i.e., positive associations have been reported in most ecological studies, while null associations have been reported in most case-control studies [31,32]. We did not observe a significant association between indoor radon level and leukemia incidence in both genders among children and adolescents in the present study, which was consistent with a recent prospective analysis that showed a null association [33].
The incidence of NHL, which comprises 95.4% of lymphoma cases in Korea [34], has dramatically increased worldwide [13] and in Korea [14]. This increase cannot be explained only by increased detection rates due to advances in medical technologies. Very little is known about the environmental risk factors of NHL in early life [35,36]. Increased NHL risk in children has been associated with exposure to high levels of ionizing radiation [37], but studies in mine workers did not show a significant association between NHL and radon exposure [38,39]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show a significant NHL risk in female children and adolescents in association with indoor radon exposure. The increased risk of NHL in females was likely due to the risk in children and adolescents in the present study, which is not consistent with the previous reports that showed no clear association with NHL in children and adolescents [32,40]. However, these previous studies did not stratify their analysis by gender.
The present finding of increased risk of NHL in female subjects is supported by those of a recent study, which showed a significant increase in the incidence of lymphoid malignancies in women living in a county with a higher radon level than in those living in a county with a lower radon level [41]. Furthermore, the study showed a comparable risk estimate of 40%/100 Bq/m3 [41] compared to the 4%/10 Bq/m3 observed in the present study. Although the gender difference should be investigated further, one possible explanation is that more women stay at home for longer periods of time compared to men [42]; thus, the measured radon level might be less misclassified in women than in men [41]. A higher baseline rate of NHL in men might be exposed to various hazardous factors due to behavioral patterns and occupational settings, which leads to the higher contribution of indoor radon to cancer risk in women [41], and this may also be true in the Korean population in the present study, in which men had a higher baseline rate of NHL [14].
In the present study, indoor radon measurements were performed over a long period of time (1989 to 2009); while most of the measurements were made in dwellings, some were also collected in public buildings. Presumably, the natural release of radon and its progeny does not vary over time because its source is soil granite [4]. However, the strengths of this study include the measurements over a long time period, including those in public buildings as well as in dwellings, particularly in schools, measurements across all seasons, and in various housing types and from representatively sampled sites, which combined may better represent the indoor exposure level.
In addition, the present study used Bayesian methods for small area analysis and disease mapping, which might have improved the estimation precision by utilizing both local and neighboring observations [25].
This study has several limitations. First, the ecological correlational study design does not guarantee a causal association between indoor radon exposure and the risk of cancer because of the “ecological fallacy” at an individual level. Particularly for the yet unconfirmed associations of leukemia and NHL with radon exposure, the results should be interpreted carefully. However, this design can provide a community-level risk factor [43]. The ecological study results are more valuable for direct inference at the community level with respect to environmental public health interventions [44], particularly in terms of an established causal relationship, such as indoor radon and lung cancer.
Second, we could not fully adjust for the potential confounding factors in the regions. For example, there is evidence of an inverse association between NHL and ultraviolet radiation exposure [45]. However, if the unadjusted factor does not have a stronger association with the outcome than the factor of interest, the percent interpretation of the potential confounding factor for the association is not that high and the estimates will be minimally biased [46].
Third, NHL is a collective term including heterogeneous subtypes of disease and some chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can be classified as NHL. However, the incidence of CLL in Asia is far lower than that in Western countries: less than 5% versus about 30% of all leukemia, respectively [47]. Furthermore, a small portion of NHL cases (1.3%) was identified as CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma in a Korean nationwide survey based on pathological findings in 2005 and 2006 [34]. Therefore, the degree of misclassification between NHL and leukemia might not be significant in the present study.
Finally, we could not consider the migration of people from region to region during the study period, which may contribute to the misclassification of radon exposure at the individual level. The Korean migration rate based on the unit of the study region was about 10% in 2009, which is higher than that in the US (3.7%) or in Japan (2%) at similar regional levels in 2009 [48]. If the migration is not related to radon exposure level, then it can be reasonably assumed that misclassification is not differential between different exposure groups. Under certain conditions, the non-differential exposure misclassification can skew the results toward the null [49] and lead to the underestimation of the effect size in the present study.

5. Conclusions

We observed an increased risk of lung cancer in men and an increased risk of NHL in women, particularly in young women, in association with indoor radon exposure in South Korea. The significantly increased risk of NHL in women requires confirmation in future prospective cohort studies.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Nuclear Technology R&D program of the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) in Korea.

Author Contributions

Mina Ha, Seung-sik Hwang, Byung-Uck Chang, and Yongjae Kim were responsible for the conception and design of the study. Sungchan Kang and No-Wook Park carried out all of the analyses. Mina Ha wrote the manuscript. Mina Ha, Seung-sik Hwang, Byung-Uck Chang, Sungchan Kang, and No-Wook Park interpreted the findings. Mina Ha and Yongjae Kim are the study guarantors and take responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors reviewed the draft of paper and contributed to the final draft of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gillmore, G.K.; Phillips, P.S.; Denman, A.R. The effects of geology and the impact of seasonal correction factors on indoor radon levels: A case study approach. J. Environ. Radioact. 2005, 84, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, C.K.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, D.M.; Chang, B.U.; Rho, B.H.; Kang, H.D. Nationwide survey of radon levels in Korea. Health Phys. 2003, 84, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. In WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, Y.; Chang, B.U.; Park, H.M.; Kim, C.K.; Tokonami, S. National radon survey in Korea. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 2011, 146, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. National Library of Korea, Sejong. Available online: http://sejong.nl.go.kr/search/searchDetail.do?rec_key=SH1_KMO201437741&upperMenuId=&menuId (accessed on 24 March 2017).
  6. Yoon, J.Y.; Lee, J.D.; Joo, S.W.; Kang, D.R. Indoor radon exposure and lung cancer: A review of ecological studies. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 25, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Darby, S.; Hill, D.; Auvinen, A.; Barros-Dios, J.M.; Baysson, H.; Bochicchio, F.; Deo, H.; Falk, R.; Forastiere, F.; Hakama, M.; et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2005, 330, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Darby, S.; Hill, D.; Deo, H.; Auvinen, A.; Barros-Dios, J.M.; Baysson, H.; Bochicchio, F.; Falk, R.; Farchi, S.; Figueiras, A.; et al. Residential radon and lung cancer—Detailed results of a collaborative analysis of individual data on 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14,208 persons without lung cancer from 13 epidemiologic studies in Europe. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2006, 32, 1–83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Lecomte, J.F.; Solomon, S.; Takala, J.; Jung, T.; Strand, P.; Murith, C.; Kiselev, S.; Zhuo, W.; Shannoun, F.; Janssens, A. ICRP Publication 126: Radiological Protection against Radon Exposure. Ann. ICRP 2014, 43, 5–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kendall, G.M.; Fell, T.P. Doses to the red bone marrow of young people and adults from radiation of natural origin. J. Radiol. Prot. Off. J. Soc. Radiol. Prot. 2011, 31, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lee, H.A.; Lee, W.K.; Lim, D.; Park, S.H.; Baik, S.J.; Kong, K.A.; Jung-Choi, K.; Park, H. Risks of Lung Cancer due to Radon Exposure among the Regions of Korea. J. Korean Med. Assoc. 2015, 30, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. National Cancer Information Center. Available online: http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040102000000 (accessed on 13 March 2017).
  13. Alexander, D.D.; Mink, P.J.; Adami, H.O.; Chang, E.T.; Cole, P.; Mandel, J.S.; Trichopoulos, D. The non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A review of the epidemiologic literature. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 120 (Suppl. S12), 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lim, D.; Ha, M.; Song, I. Trends in major cancer mortality in Korea, 1983–2012, with a joinpoint analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015, 39, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saito, H.; Goovaerts, P. Geostatistical interpolation of positively skewed and censored data in a dioxin-contaminated site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4228–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deutsch, C.V.; Journel, A.G. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  17. Webster, R.; Oliver, M.A. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. National Cancer Center. Available online: http://ncc.re.kr/cancerStatsList.ncc?sea (accessed on 24 March 2017).
  19. Armitage, P.; Berry, G.; Matthews, J.N.S. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Available online: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parentId=A (accessed on 24 March 2017).
  21. Son, M. The relationships of occupational class, educational level and deprivation with mortality in Korea. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2002, 35, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Townsend, P.; Phillimore, P.; Beattie, A. Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  23. Community Health Survey. Available online: https://chs.cdc.go.kr/chs/index.do;jsessionid=Q2lc5BDm1npaX7hPnkfAYdAtxtwqiJRnq6RGHVCUp0j6GY4ngSwHzT4KwGya0uMx.KCDCWAS02_servlet_PUB2 (accessed on 24 March 2017).
  24. Lawson, A.B. Bayesian Disease Mapping: Hierarchical Modeling in Spatial Epidemiology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhu, L.; Gorman, D.M.; Horel, S. Hierarchical Bayesian spatial models for alcohol availability, drug “hot spots” and violent crime. Int. J. Health Geograph. 2006, 5, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Besag, J.; York, J.; Mollie, A. Bayesian Image-Restoration, with 2 Applications in Spatial Statistics. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 1991, 43, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Spiegelhalter, D.; Andrew, T.; Best, N.; Lunn, D. WinBUGS User Manual Version 1.4.1; Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit: Cambridge, UK, 2003; Available online: https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/manual14.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2017).
  28. Brooks, S.P.; Gelman, A. General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1997, 7, 434–455. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chahine, T.; Schultz, B.D.; Zartarian, V.G.; Xue, J.; Subramanian, S.V.; Levy, J.I. Modeling joint exposures and health outcomes for cumulative risk assessment: The case of radon and smoking. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 3688–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schnelzer, M.; Hammer, G.P.; Kreuzer, M.; Tschense, A.; Grosche, B. Accounting for smoking in the radon-related lung cancer risk among German uranium miners: Results of a nested case-control study. Health Phys. 2010, 98, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tong, J.; Qin, L.; Cao, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Nie, J.; An, Y. Environmental radon exposure and childhood leukemia. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B Crit. Rev. 2012, 15, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Raaschou-Nielsen, O. Indoor radon and childhood leukaemia. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2008, 132, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hauri, D.; Spycher, B.; Huss, A.; Zimmermann, F.; Grotzer, M.; von der Weid, N.; Weber, D.; Spoerri, A.; Kuehni, C.E.; Roosli, M. Domestic radon exposure and risk of childhood cancer: A prospective census-based cohort study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 1239–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, J.M.; Ko, Y.H.; Lee, S.S.; Huh, J.; Kang, C.S.; Kim, C.W.; Kang, Y.K.; Go, J.H.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, W.S.; et al. WHO Classification of Malignant Lymphomas in Korea: Report of the Third Nationwide Study. Korean J. Pathol. 2011, 45, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Crump, C.; Sundquist, K.; Sieh, W.; Winkleby, M.A.; Sundquist, J. Perinatal and family risk factors for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in early life: A Swedish national cohort study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012, 104, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Miligi, L.; Benvenuti, A.; Mattioli, S.; Salvan, A.; Tozzi, G.A.; Ranucci, A.; Legittimo, P.; Rondelli, R.; Bisanti, L.; Zambon, P.; et al. Risk of childhood leukaemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after parental occupational exposure to solvents and other agents: The SETIL Study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 70, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. McNally, R.J.; Parker, L. Environmental factors and childhood acute leukemias and lymphomas. Leukemia Lymphoma 2006, 47, 583–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zablotska, L.B.; Lane, R.S.; Frost, S.E.; Thompson, P.A. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma mortality (1950–1999) and incidence (1969–1999) in the Eldorado uranium workers cohort. Environ. Res. 2014, 130, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rericha, V.; Kulich, M.; Rericha, R.; Shore, D.L.; Sandler, D.P. Incidence of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma in Czech uranium miners: A case-cohort study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Peckham, E.C.; Scheurer, M.E.; Danysh, H.E.; Lubega, J.; Langlois, P.H.; Lupo, P.J. Residential Radon Exposure and Incidence of Childhood Lymphoma in Texas, 1995–2011. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 12110–12126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Teras, L.R.; Diver, W.R.; Turner, M.C.; Krewski, D.; Sahar, L.; Ward, E.; Gapstur, S.M. Residential radon exposure and risk of incident hematologic malignancies in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort. Environ. Res. 2016, 148, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Krewski, D.; Lubin, J.H.; Zielinski, J.M.; Alavanja, M.; Catalan, V.S.; Field, R.W.; Klotz, J.B.; Letourneau, E.G.; Lynch, C.F.; Lyon, J.I.; et al. Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: A combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies. Epidemiology 2005, 16, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bradford, P.; Smith, D. Large Animal Internal Medicine, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Munich, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  44. Berkman, I.K.; Maria Glymour, M. Social Epidemiology, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cahoon, E.K.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Wheeler, D.C.; Arhancet, J.; Lin, S.W.; Alexander, B.H.; Linet, M.S.; Freedman, D.M. Relationship between ambient ultraviolet radiation and non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: A U.S. population-based study of racial and ethnic groups. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E432–E441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Szklo, M. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics, 3rd ed.; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwartz, G.G.; Klug, M.G. Incidence rates of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in US states are associated with residential radon levels. Future Oncol. 2016, 12, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Statistics Korea. National Index System. Available online: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1013 (accessed on 3 December 2017).
  49. Weinberg, C.R.; Umbach, D.M.; Greenland, S. When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend? Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994, 140, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 14 00344 g001 550
Figure 1. Estimated indoor radon concentrations using kriging of national radon survey data in Korea, 1989 to 2009. (A) Indoor radon measurement points in the national radon survey [4]; (B) Lognormal kriging results; (C) Aggregated radon concentrations in each region.
Figure 1. Estimated indoor radon concentrations using kriging of national radon survey data in Korea, 1989 to 2009. (A) Indoor radon measurement points in the national radon survey [4]; (B) Lognormal kriging results; (C) Aggregated radon concentrations in each region.
Ijerph 14 00344 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of the national radon survey from 1989 to 2009, Korea.
Table 1. Summary of the national radon survey from 1989 to 2009, Korea.
Site (No. of Measurement Point)DeviceCommentsAnnual Radon Concentration (Bq/m3)
Arithmetic MeanGeometric MeanMax.
1st Survey (1989)
Dwellings (530)RadTrack- indoor measurements only during the winter 103.992.2496
2nd Survey (1999–2000)
Dwellings for three months (2953)RadTrak- calculation of annual average indoor concentration
- distribution by season, house type, building age
- focused on urban areas 		52.542.11350
3rd Survey (2002–2005)
Dwellings for three months (Rn 970, Tn 450)RadTrak, Radpot, thoron progeny monitor- indoor Rn distribution map
- distribution by season, house type, building age
- more rural areas		66.355.71186
4th Survey (2008–2009)
Public buildings (1100)Raduet- 63% schools, 36.3% local governmental offices
- measured on the first floor of the buildings		79.360.51004
Total (5553) 62.149.01350
This information was abstracted from a previous report by Kim et al. [4].
Table
Table 2. Distribution of characteristics among 234 administrative regions in Korea.
Table 2. Distribution of characteristics among 234 administrative regions in Korea.
Characteristics of the 234 RegionsMeanMin.Max.
Population (no. 2009) a172,85710,3251,073,149
  Male88,090.55393539,655
  Female 85,348.54935533,494
Median age (years, 2009) a42.832.859.2
  Male40.831.556.1
  Female44.833.162.6
Aggregated indoor radon concentration (Bq/m3)5724231
Deprivation index (z-score, 2005)0.06−7.827.28
Smoking rate (%, 2009) b26.716.433.4
  Male50.431.962.4
  Female6.00.412.5
Age-standardized incidence ratio c
Lung cancer
  Male (no. of cases) e1.05 (494)0.51 (26)1.53 (1617)
  Female (no. of cases) e1.00 (185)0.48 (11)1.42 (736)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, all
  Male (no. of cases) e1.01 (55)0.44 (3)1.70 (256)
  Female (no. of cases) e0.99 (43)0.46 (3)2.00 (211)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, children and adolescents d
  Male (no. of cases) e1.00 (12)0.00 (0)3.93 (69)
  Female (no. of cases) e0.98 (9)0.00 (0)3.42 (51)
Leukemia, all
  Male (no. of cases) e0.98 (68)0.46 (4)1.48 (283)
  Female (no. of cases) e0.98 (50)0.32 (0)1.65 (232)
Leukemia, children and adolescents d
  Male (no. of cases) e0.94 (4)0.00 (0)4.99 (25)
  Female (no. of cases) e0.99 (2)0.00 (0)6.13 (14)
a: data from the 2009 Resident Registered Population of Korea (Korean Statistical Information System); b: age-standardized smoking rate obtained from 2009 Community Health Survey data (Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention); c: standardized by five-year age group and using Central Cancer Registry data for the number of cancers from 1999 to 2008; d: leukemia among people less than 20 years of age; e: total number of cancer cases, 1999–2008.
Table
Table 3. Relative risk and 95% credible intervals for lung cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and leukemia in relation to regional indoor radon concentrations in 234 regions of Korea, 1999 to 2013.
Table 3. Relative risk and 95% credible intervals for lung cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and leukemia in relation to regional indoor radon concentrations in 234 regions of Korea, 1999 to 2013.
Per 10 Bq/m3 Increase in Radon ConcentrationCrudeAdjusted a
Cancer TypeRelative Risk95% Credible IntervalsRelative Risk95% Credible Intervals
MaleLung cancer1.03(1.02, 1.05)1.01(1.00, 1.02)
NHL, all1.01(0.99, 1.03)1.00(0.98, 1.02)
NHL in children and adolescents b0.98(0.94, 1.02)0.97(0.93, 1.02)
Leukemia, all 0.98(0.96, 1.00)0.98(0.96, 1.00)
Leukemia in children and adolescents b0.96(0.89, 1.03)1.00(0.92, 1.08)
FemaleLung cancer1.01(0.99, 1.02)1.01(0.99, 1.02)
NHL, all1.03(1.01, 1.06)1.04(1.02, 1.07)
NHL in children and adolescents b1.04(0.99, 1.10)1.07(1.01, 1.13)
Leukemia, all 0.98(0.96, 1.01)0.98(0.95, 1.00)
Leukemia in children and adolescents b1.00(0.91, 1.10)0.98(0.88, 1.08)
Relative risk and 95% credible intervals estimated using the hierarchical Bayesian model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods; a: adjusted for smoking rate and regional deprivation index; b: less than 20 years of age; NHL: non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ha, M.; Hwang, S.-s.; Kang, S.; Park, N.-W.; Chang, B.-U.; Kim, Y. Geographical Correlations between Indoor Radon Concentration and Risks of Lung Cancer, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, and Leukemia during 1999–2008 in Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040344

AMA Style

Ha M, Hwang S-s, Kang S, Park N-W, Chang B-U, Kim Y. Geographical Correlations between Indoor Radon Concentration and Risks of Lung Cancer, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, and Leukemia during 1999–2008 in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(4):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ha, Mina, Seung-sik Hwang, Sungchan Kang, No-Wook Park, Byung-Uck Chang, and Yongjae Kim. 2017. "Geographical Correlations between Indoor Radon Concentration and Risks of Lung Cancer, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, and Leukemia during 1999–2008 in Korea" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 4: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop